Google
This is a digital copy of a book that was preserved for generations on library shelves before it was carefully scanned by Google as part of a project
to make the world's books discoverable online.
It has survived long enough for the copyright to expire and the book to enter the public domain. A public domain book is one that was never subject
to copyright or whose legal copyright term has expired. Whether a book is in the public domain may vary country to country. Public domain books
are our gateways to the past, representing a wealth of history, culture and knowledge that's often difficult to discover.
Marks, notations and other maiginalia present in the original volume will appear in this file - a reminder of this book's long journey from the
publisher to a library and finally to you.
Usage guidelines
Google is proud to partner with libraries to digitize public domain materials and make them widely accessible. Public domain books belong to the
public and we are merely their custodians. Nevertheless, this work is expensive, so in order to keep providing tliis resource, we liave taken steps to
prevent abuse by commercial parties, including placing technical restrictions on automated querying.
We also ask that you:
+ Make non-commercial use of the files We designed Google Book Search for use by individuals, and we request that you use these files for
personal, non-commercial purposes.
+ Refrain fivm automated querying Do not send automated queries of any sort to Google's system: If you are conducting research on machine
translation, optical character recognition or other areas where access to a large amount of text is helpful, please contact us. We encourage the
use of public domain materials for these purposes and may be able to help.
+ Maintain attributionTht GoogXt "watermark" you see on each file is essential for in forming people about this project and helping them find
additional materials through Google Book Search. Please do not remove it.
+ Keep it legal Whatever your use, remember that you are responsible for ensuring that what you are doing is legal. Do not assume that just
because we believe a book is in the public domain for users in the United States, that the work is also in the public domain for users in other
countries. Whether a book is still in copyright varies from country to country, and we can't offer guidance on whether any specific use of
any specific book is allowed. Please do not assume that a book's appearance in Google Book Search means it can be used in any manner
anywhere in the world. Copyright infringement liabili^ can be quite severe.
About Google Book Search
Google's mission is to organize the world's information and to make it universally accessible and useful. Google Book Search helps readers
discover the world's books while helping authors and publishers reach new audiences. You can search through the full text of this book on the web
at|http: //books .google .com/I
^31
THE
HISTORY OF EOME.
VOL. II.
LONDON: PBIMTBD BT
sronzsirooDK and co^ mbw-stbbr bqctabb
▲V9 fkUhUUMWX BTBBBT
THE
HISTOEY OF EOME.
BT
WILHELM IHNE.
ENGLISH EDITION.
VOL. n.
LONDON:
I^ONGMANS, GREEN, AND CO.
1871.
CONTENTS
OF
THE SECOND VOLUME.
FOUETH BOOK.
STRUGGLE FOR THE ASCENDANCY
IN THE WEST.
CHAPTBK I.
CABTHAGE.
FAOB
Differences of soil and climate between Europe and Africa • 3
Migrations of the Semitic and Aryan tribes .... 3
Phoenician colonisation in Aj&ica 4
Points of difference between the Phoenician and Soman
colonies 5
Rapid growth and power of Carthage 5
Nature of the Carthaginian empire 6
Elements of weakness in the Carthaginian state ... 6
Geographical dangers - . 7
Agriculture and trade of Carthage 8
Dependents and tributaries of Carthage .... 9
The Liby-Phoenicians 10
The Carthaginian state 10
Acknowledgment of Carthaginian supremacy . . .10
Phoenician cities of northern Africa II
The Numidians 12
Foreign possessions of Carthage 12
Sardinia 13
Gades and other settlements in Spain 14
Constitution of Carthage 14
O
84266
VI
CONTENTS OF
Points of likeness between the Carthaginian and other oon
stitutions • • • .
Municipal goyemment of Carthage
The Suffetes
The command of the army
Carthaginian timocracj
The Carthaginian senate
The people .
Criminal jurisdiction .
Carthaginian aristocracy
PAGX
15
15
16
18
18
19
19
20
CHAPTER II.
SICILY.
Historical geography of Sicily
Greek and Carthaginian power in Sicily
Defeat of the Carthaginians at Himera
Preponderance of Syracuse .
Destruction of Agrigentum .
Tyranny of the elder Dionysius
Victories of Dionysius .
Siege of Syracuse
Piraticiil expeditions of Dionysius
The younger Dionysius and Timoleon
Barren victories of Timoleon
Tyranny of Agathokles
Later expeditions of Agathokles .
22
23
23
24
25
25
26
26
27
28
29
29
30
- CHAPTER in.
THE FIRST PUNIC WAR, 264-241 B.C.
First Period. To the capture of Agi-igentuniy 262 B.C.
Fortunes of Zankle or Messana 32
Capture of Rhegium by Roman mutineers .... S3
Hiero, tyrant of Syracuse 34
Relations of Carthage to Rome 35
Jealousy of Rome for Carthage 36
Resolution of the Romans to aid the Mamertincs of Messana . 37
Change in the character of Roman history .... 38
Relative strength of Rome and Carthago .... 38
THE SECOND VOLUMK
VU
Occupation of Messana by tbe Romans .
Landing of the Romans in Sicily . •
Ineffectual league of Hiero with the Carthaginians
Second campaign in Sicily, 263 b.g.
Alliance of Hiero with Rome
Decline of the Carthaginian power in Sicily .
Probable causes of the success of the Romans
Renewed efforts of the Carthaginians, 262 te.a
The Romans besiege Agrigentum • •
Defeat of Hanno
Escape of the Carthaginian garrison under Hannibal
Historical value of the narrative .
Extended designs of the Romans .
PAOB
89
40
40
42
42
43
44
45
46
47
47
48
49
Second Period, 261-255 b.c. The first Boman fleet. MylcB,
Ecnomus, Regulus in Africa.
Maritime supremacy of Carthage 49
Determination of the Romans to cope with Carthage by sea . 50
Late development of the Roman navy 51
The building of the fleet 52
Improbabilities of the story 53
Composition of the Roman navy 54
Capture of the fleet of Cn. Cornelius Scipio .... 55
Battle of Mylse 55
Roman naval tactics . . • . . . .57
Defeat of the Carthaginians 57
Relief of Segesta 58
Operations of Hamilcar 59
Destruction of Eryx by Ilamilcar 60
Victory of Hamilcar at Thermae 60
Renewed successes of the Romans . "^^ . . .61
Expedition of Scipio to Corsica 62
Battle of Tyndaris 64
Movements of the fleet under Regulus and Manlius V ulso . 65
Battle of Ecnomus 65
Landing of the Romans on Carthaginian territory ... 66
Ravages of the Roman army in Africa 67
Exorbitant demands of Regulus as conditions of peace . 69
Defeat of Regulus 70
Victory of the Romans at the Hermiean promontory . '. 71
Destruction of the Roman fleet off the coast of Sicily . . 72
viii CONTENTS OF
Third Period, 254-250 B.a The victory at Panprmus.
PAO«
Capture of Panormus by On. Cornelius Scipio ... 73
Failure of the second Roman expedition to Africa ... 73
Exhaustion of both sides 75
Capture of Lipara by the Romans « « • . .76
Victory of the Romans at Panormus 76
Alleged mission of Carthaginian envoys to Rome ... 78
The story of Regulus •..««... 78
The silence of Polybius . 80
Probable origin of the story • . • « . \ .80
Fourth Period, 250-249 b.c. Lilyhcmm and Drepana.
Effects of the victory of Panormus 81
Attack on Lilybaeum by the Romans 82
Number of the besieging force 88
Duration of the siege 83
Modes of si^e in ancient war&re 84
Obstinacy of the dege of Lily baBum 85
Movements of Adherbal and the Carthaginian fleet . . 86
Relief of Lilybasum by Hannibal 86
Unsuccessful attempt of Himilco to destroy the Roman works 87
Departure of Hannibal with his fleet 88
Capture of the Rhodian Hannibal ..... 88
Distress of the garrison of. Lily bseum ..... 89
Destruction of the Roman siege- works . . • . .89
Perseverance of the Romans 89
Their special difliculties 90
The winter blockade ........ 90
Defeat of Claudius Pulcher at Drepana . . . . '91
Dictatorship of A. Atilius Calatinus ..... 92
Alleged profanity of Claudius 93
Energy of the Carthaginians 94
Destruction of the Roman fleet and transport ships under
L. Junius 95
Seizure of the temple of the Erycinian Venus by the consul
Junius 96
Capture of Junius by the Carthaginians .... 97
Fifth Period, 248-241 b.c. Hamilcar Barcaa. Battle at the
^gatian Islands. Peace.
Ravages of the Carthaginian fleet 97
lienewal of the alliance witli Iliero 99
THE SECOND VOLUME. ix
PAOB
Exchange of prisoners with Carthage 99
Arrival of Hamilcar Barcas 99
His treatment of the Gallic mercenaries . . . .100
Operations of Hamilcar .100
Occupation of Eryx by Hamilcar 101
Sufferings of the Roman allies 102
General impoverishment of the Boman state . . . .103
Tedious prolongation of the war 104
Dispatch of Gains Lutatius Catulus with a fleet to Sicily . 105
Defeat of the Carthaginians at the uEgatian Islands . .106
Negotiations for peace 106
Position of the Romans at the close of the war . .107
Embassies to Rome from foreign states . . . .107
Changes in the military institutions of Rome . . .108
Constitution of the Roman army . . . . . .110
Evil of annually elected genends 110
The Roman navy 112
Constitution of the Carthaginian armies . . . .112
The Carthaginian generals 114
Carthaginian inferiority at sea . . . . . .114
Effect of the peace on the power of Carthage . . . .115
CHAPTER IV.
THE WAR OF THE MERCENARIES, 241-238 B.C.
Revolt of the Carthaginian allies 116
Cause of the mutiny . 116
Suppression of the mutiny .118
Conduct of the Romans « . . . . . .118
Revolt of the Carthaginian mercenaries in Sardinia . .120
Interference of the Romans in Sardinia 121
Surrender of Sardinia to the Romans 121
CHAPTER V.
THE WAR WITH THE GAULS, 225-222 B.C.
Destruction of Falerii . .123
Gallic and Illyrian wars 123
Causes of the long inaction of the Gauls in Italy . . .123
The position of the Gallic tribes 124
X CONTENTS OF
PAGB
Attack on the colony of Ariminum 124
Proposed extenfdon of the colony 125
Agrarian law of Caius Flaminius 126
Conduct of the patricians to Flaminius 127
The great road of Flaminius 127
Movements among the Gallic tribes 127
Fears of the Romans 128
March of the Gauls 129
Retreat of the Gauls from Clusium and battle of Telamon . 129
Annihilation of the Gallic army 131
Devastation of the Boian territory by the consid jEmilius . 132
Results of the battle of Telamon 133
Subjugation of the Insubrians 134
CHAPTER VI.
THE FIRST ILLYRIAN WAR, 229-228 B.C.
Roman colonies on the Adriatic ...... 136
The pirates of Illyricum 136
Roman embassy to Illyricum 138
Successful Roman campaigns in Illyricum . . . .139
CHAPTER Vn.
THE SECOND ILLYRIAN WAR, 219 B.C.
Alliance of Demetrius of Pharos with Antigonus, king of
Macedonia 141
Capture of Pharos by -ffimilius Paullus . . . .141
Position of Rome after the Gallic and Ulyrian wars . 142
CHAPTER Vin.
THE SECOND PUNIC OR HANNIBALIAN WAR, 218-201 B.C.
First Period. From the beginning of the war to the battle of
Cannce^ 218-216 b.c.
Resultsof the first Punic war 143
Effects of the war on the internal constitution of Carthage . 143
Policy of Hamilcar Barcas 145
Phoenician settlements in Spain 145
Rapid growth of Carthaginian power in Spain . .14(5
THE SECOND VOLUME. xi
PAQB
Attitude of the Roman Htate 146
Death of Hasdrubal 147
Hannibal, son of Hamilcar Barcas 147
Hatred of the Romans for Hannibal 149
Real position of HannibiJ as a Carthaginian general . .150
Resources of Carthage 152
Policy of the Romans in delaying the renewal of the war . 153
Alliance of Sagnntum with Rome 154
Preparations of Hannibal .154
Importance of Saguntum . 155
Roman embassy to Hannibal . . ' . 156
Siege of Saguntum by Hannibal 156
Second embassy of the Romans to the Carthaginians .157
Character of the second Punic war 158
Growth of an Italo-Roman nation 159
Grain to the conquered tribes 159
Burdens of the Roman allies . . . . .160
Population of Italy 160
Naval power of the Romans and Carthaginians . . .161
Alliance of the Carthaginians with the Gauls . . .162
Expected revolt of the Italian allies 163
Attitude of the Macedonian government . . . .164
Provisions of Hannibal for the defence of Spain and Africa . 164
March of Hannibal from New Carthage, 218 b.c. . . .165
Landing of a Roman army at Massilia . . .166
Inadequate preparations of the Romans . . .166
Rising of the Boian Gauls . 167
Additional Roman levies . . . . . . .167
Voyage and march of Scipio 168
Boldness and wisdom of HannibaFs plan . . .170
Hannibal and the AUobrogians . . . . • .171
Passage of the Alps 171
Geographical controversies 173
March to the Little St. Bernard . .... 173
Hostility of the mountaineers . . . .175
Treacheiy of the Gauls 176
Descent of the Alps 176
Condition of Hannibal's army . . . . .177
Hannibal and the Taurinians 179
Alleged device of Hannibal for the encouragement of his
soldiers 180
March and defeat of Scipio 180
Passage of the Trebia 181
Attitude of the Gallic tribes 182
xii CONTENTS OF
PAGS
Movement of the Roman army to the left bank of the Trebia . 182
Operations of Sempronius in Sicily 183
Zeal of King Hiero 184
Junction of Sempronius with Scipio 185
Preparations for the battle of the Trebia «... 187
Tactics of Hannibal 187
Defeat of the Bomans 188
Retreat of Scipio to Placentia 189
Success and ability of Hannibal 190
Effects of Hannibal's victory 190
Hannibal's treatment of his prisoners 191
Winter operations of Hannibal 191
Unsuccessful attempt of Hannibal to cross the Apennines . 192
Operations in Spain 193
Defeat of Hanno by Scipio 194
Alarm in the city of Rome on the tidings of Hannibal's victory
at the Trebia 194
Opposition to Flaminius 197
Efforts to prevent the re-election of Flaminius . . . 198
Flaminius elected consul 198
Marches of the two consuls 200
Miscalculation of the Romans 202
March of the Carthaginians 202
Movements of Hannibal towards Rome 203
Movements of Flaminius 204
Reasons for the censures passed upon Flaminius . . . 205
Charges brought against Flaminius 205
Disposition of Hannibal's forces 207
The battle of the Thrasymene lake 207
Dismay in the city of Rome on the tidings of the battle . .210
Defeat of Centenius 210
Firmness of the Roman senate 211
Prodictatorship of Q. Fabius Maximus 212
Military measures of Fabius 213
Greatness of the emergency .213
Plans of Hannibal 214
The Carthaginians in Picenum . . . . . .215
Adoption of the Roman arms 216
Exultation at Carthage 216
The fidelity of the Roman allies 217
Roman firmness . 218
Roman levies 219
Tactics of Fabius in Apulia 219
Events in Campania 220
THE SECOND VOLUME. llii
PAGB
Disaatisiaction of the Romans with Fabius .... 222
The military power shared equally between the dictator and
the master of the horse 223
Defeat of Minucius 224
Effects ofthe policy of Fabius 224
Spiritof the Roman senate 225
Operations of Cn. Scipio in Spain 226
Dispatch of reinforcements for Spain 227
Civil dissensions at Rome 228
Enrolment of a new Roman army 229
Question of supplies 230
Position of the Roman army 231
Defectsof Roman military usage 231
Movements of the consul ^milius 232
State of feeling in Rome 233
The battle-field of Cannffi 234
Disposition of the Carthaginian army 235
Defeat of the Roman cavalry 236
Destruction of the Roman in&ntry 236
Capture of the Roman camps 237
Effects of the battle of Cannffi 238
Causes assigned by popular writers for the Roman defeat . 239
The Roman allies 240
Disposition of Hannibal towards the Romans . . 240
Danger of the Roman city 241
Precautions of the senate 241
Military measures for carrying on the war .... 242
Second Period, From the battle of Cannce to the Revolution
in Syracuse^ 216-215 B.C.
Position of Hannibal in Italy 244
The histories of Polybius 244
Religious ceremonies at Rome 246
Drain of the war on the population of Italy .... 247
New levies of the dictator M. Junius Pera .... 249
Refusal of the Romans to ransom the prisoners taken at Canns 249
Roman slanders against Hannibal 251
Position of Hannibal after the battle of Cannae . . . 253
Reasons for Hannibal's hesitation to march upon Rome . . 254
Policy of Hannibal 254
Overtures of Hannibal to the Roman aUies .... 255
Fidelity of the allies to Rome 255
Revolts in Bruttium and Campania 256
Change in the character of the war 257
xiv CONTENTS OF
PAGE
Resolution of the GarthaginianB to reinforce Hannibal . . 257
The war in Spain 258
Further revolts among the Roman allies .... 258
Condition of Capua 258
Disposition of the plebeians of Capua towards Hannibal . 259
Revolt of Capua, Atella, and Calatia 260
The resistance of Dec ius Magius to Hannibal . . .261
Story of PacuviuB Calavius 262
Occupation of Nola by the praetor Marcellus 263
Occupation of Nuceria and Acerrse by Hannibal . . 264
Siege of Casilinum 265
Prospects of the war 267
Hannibal's Italian allies 267
Defeat of Hasdrubal at Ibera in Spain . ... . . 268
State of Corsica, Sardinia, and Sicily 269
Defeat of Postumius Albinus in Cisalpine Graul . .271
Further revolts of Roman allies in Bruttium . . .271
Sojourn of Hannibal in Capua 272
Operations in Campania, 215 B.C. 273
Defeat of the Carthaginians at Illiturgi and Intibili in Spain,
215 B.C 275
Success of the Romans in Sardinia 276
Alliance of Philip of Macedonia with Hannibal . . . 276
Mistaken policy of Philip 278
Third Period, The War in Sicily, 215-212 b.c.
Death of Hiero, king of Syracuse 280
Character of Hiero's reign .281
Relations of Hiero with Rome and Carthage . .282
Effects of Roman supremacy in Sicily 284
Re-constitution of the Roman senate 285
Financial difficulties 288
Financial measures 289
Commission of the year 216 B.c 289
Sumptuary laws 290
Amount of the Roman levies 290
Recovery of Casilinum, and repulse of Hannibal at Nola . 291
Revolution in Sicily '. . 292
Negotiations between Hannibal and Hieronymus . . .293
Republican reaction in Syracuse 294
Death of Hieronymus 294
Surrender of Ortygia by Andranodoros 295
Massacre of the &mily of Hiero ...... 296
THE SECOND VOLUME. xv
PAOB
Counter revolution in Syracuse 297
Triumph of the Carthaginian party at Syracuee . . . 298
March of Marcellus to Syracuse 299
Military resources of Syracuse 300
Failure of the attempts of Marcellus to storm Syracuse . . dOl
Carthaginian operations in Sicily 302
Massacre of the inhabitants of Enna by L. Pinarius • . 303
Results of the massacre 304
Siege of Syracuse by Marcellus 305
Anarchy in Sp*acu8e 309
Treachery of Mericus 310
FaU and sack of Sjrracuse 310
Fourth Period, From the taking of Syracuse to the
capture of Capua, 212-211 b.c.
Surrenderof Agrigentum by Mutines, and complete subjugation
of Sicily 313
Eyents in Spain and Africa 314
Employment of mercenaries in Spain 316
Defeat and death of the Scipios 316
Operations of Hannibal in southern Italy . . . .318
Dishonesty of Roman contractors 319
Trial of M. Postmnius Pyrgensis 319
Condenmation of Postumius and his accomplices . . 320
Roman civic morality 321
Growth of superstition in Rome 321
Levying of new legions 322
Surrender of Tarentum to Hannibal 323
Proclamation of Hannibal to the Tarentines . . . 324
Siege of the citadel of Tarentum 325
Alliance of other Greek cities with Hannibal . . . 326
Roman designs against Capua 326
Condition of Capua 327
Request of the Capuans to Hannibal for supplies . . 328
Capture of the convoys for Capua by the Romans . . 328
Defeat and death of Sempronius Gracchus «... 329
Total defeat of Fulvius in Apulia 330
Relative position of Hannibal and the Romans . 330
Resolution of the Roman people 331
Siege of Capua 331
Resistance of the Capuans 332
Internal condition of Capua 333
Attempts of Hannibal to relieve Capua .... 333
March of Hannibal towards Rome . . • • - 335
CONTENTS OF
Dismay of the Romans 336
Measures of the senate 337
Retreat of Hannibal from Rome 338
Fall of Capua 340
Treatment of Capua by the Romans 841
Execution of Capuans at Rome 343
Explanation of Roman policy 346
Fifth Period. From the fall of Capua to the battle on the
Metaurus, 211-207 b.c.
Change in the character of the war 346
Dispatch of Roman reinforcements to Spain .... 346
Early life of Publius Cornelius Scipio 347
Family influence of the Scipios in Rome .... 348
Character of Scipio 350
Departure of Scipio for Spain 351
Plans of Scipio 351
Siege and capture of New Carthage 352
Roman regulations for the sack of towns . . . . 354
Disposal of the booty 354
Plunder of New Carthage 354
Personal anecdotes of Scipio 356
Effects of the fell of New Carthage 357
Disposition of the Italian towns 358
Difliculties of HannibaFs position 358
Betrayal of Salapia to Marcellus 358
Defeat of Cn. Fulvius Centumalus at Herdonea . . . 359
Destruction of Herdonea by Hannibal 360
Operations of Marcellus 360
Defeat of the Roman fleet by the Tarentines .• . . . 361
Pressure of the war on the Romans 362
Refusal of twelve Latin colonies to contribute men and money
for the war 363
Seriousness of the crisis 363
Fidelity of the remaining eighteen Latin colonies . . . 364
Roman preparations for the re-conquest of Tarentum . . 866
Operations of Fabius and Marcellus 367
Capture of the Roman army before Caulonia by Hannibal . 367
Betrayal of Tarentum to the Romans 368
Position of Hannibal after the fall of Tarentum . . . 369
Fifth consulship of Marcellus 370
Death of Marcellus 371
Character and ability of Marcellus 371
Source of the exaggerations in the story of Marcellus . 374
THE SECOND VOLUME. Xvii
PAQB
Haimng of the aiege of Locri 375
Prospects of the Romans 375
Discontent in Etruria 376
Eyents in Spain 378
Battle of Bcecula and march of Hasdrubal . .379
Anxiety in Rome 381
MUitaiy measures of the Romans 383
Consnlship of C. Claudius Nero and M. Livius Sallnator . 383
Haadmbal's march through Gaul 385
MoTements of Hannibal 386
Capture of the messengers of Hasdrubal . • . . 387
March of Nero 388
Battle of the Metaurus 389
Effect of the victory on the Romans 391
Plans of Hannibal 393
Triumph of the consuls . . . . . . . 398
Sixth Period. From the battle on the Metaurus to the taking
ofLocri^ 207-205 b.c.
Character of Carthaginian and Roman conquests in Spain . 394
Allied exploits of Scipio in Spain 396
Populari^ of Scipio in Spain 397
Magnificence and power of Scipio 399
Capture of Oringis by the Romans 400
Second battle of Becula 401
OTertures- of Masinissa to Scipio 401
Relations of Scipio with Sjrphax 402
Alleged meeting of Scipio with Syphax .... 403
Story of the funeral games at New Carthage . . . 404
Storming of niiturgi 405
Destruction of Astapa 406
Illness of Scipio and mutiny of troops 406
Defeat of Mandonius and Indibilis 407
FallofGades 407
Significance of the battle of the liletaurus .... 409
Policy of Philip of Macedon 409
Condition of the Greek states 410
League between the ^tolians and the Romans . . .411
Effects of the league with the .£tolians . . . .412
War between the ^tolians and Philip of Macedonia . .412
Betom of Scipio to Rome 414
Debates on the expedition to Africa 415
Poaiticm of Hannibal 417
Compromise between Scipio and the senate . . • .417
yoito ii« a
xvili CONTENTS OF
PAGE
Voluntary contributions for the fleet and army of Scipio . 418
State of the Roman troops 419
Surprise and capture of Locri 420
Atrocities of the Roman soldiers after the capture of Locri . 421
Measures of the Roman senate and people on the complaints
of the Locrians ... .... 422
. 424
. 426
. 427
. 428
Preparations of Scipio for the descent on Africa
Expedition of Mago from Minorca
Embarkation of Scipio at Lilybaeum
Landing of Scipio in Africa
Seventh Period, The War in Africa to the Conclusion of
Peace, 204-201 B.C.
Character of the war in Africa . . • • . ,429
Plans of Scipio 430
Siege of Utica 430
Vigorous resistance of the Uticans . . . . .431
Alliance of Masinissa with Scipio 433
Destruction of the African camps 434
Defeat of Hasdrubal and Syphax 435
Capture of Syphax by Masinissa 436
Defeat of Scipio' s fleet by the Carthaginians . ' . . . 436
Negotiations for peace ... . . . . . . 438
Conditions of the armistice 439
Reception of the Carthaginian ambassadors at Rome . . 439
Recall and death of Mago 440
Relations of Hannibal with the king of Macedonia . .441
The bronze tablets of Hannibal ...... 442
Slanderous charges against Hannibal 443
Recall of Hannibal from Italy .... . . 444
Landing of Hannibal at Leptis 445
Failure of the peace negotiations 445
Shipwreck of a Roman convoy in the bay of Carthage . . 446
Operations of Hannibal against Masinissa .... 448
The so-called battle of Zama 449
Disposition of the opposing forces , 450
The order of the Roman legions . . . . . .451
Complete defeat of the Carthaginians 452
Return of Hannibal to Carthage 453
Policy of Scipio 453
State of parties in Carthage 454
Terms of peace ......... 455
Truce for three months 455
Joy in Rome on the tidings of Scipio's victor}' . . . 456
THE SECOND VOLUME. XlX
PAOB
Destruction of the Carthaginian fleet 456
Eewards bestowed on Masinissa 457
Triumph of Scipio 457
CHAPTER K.
Real significance of the second Punic war .... 459
The narratives of Livy and Poljbius and other historians . 460
Real causes of Roman superiority 461
The Italian fortresses 462
Reasons for the Carthaginian invasions of Italy from the
north 463
Naval inactivity of the Carthaginians 464
Probable reasons for the decay of the Carthaginian navy . 465
Roman military organisation 466
Lengthened term of military service 466
Recognition of plunder as a supplement for inadequate pay-
ment of soldiers 467
Ferocity consequent on the licence of pillage . . • 468
Influence of mercenaries on the regular armies of Rome . 469
Character of the Roman military officers .... 469
The usurers and speculators 470
Influence of war on the distribution of property . . .471
General devastation of Italy 471
Multiplication of Roman festivals 473
Character of Roman amusements 473
Character of Roman art and literatiue 474
Livius Andronicus and his successors 475
Greek influence on the religion of the Romans . . . 476
Increasing poverty of the lower classes of Roman citizens . 478
Lawless enrichment of the Roman nobility . . . .479
Preponderance of the senate 479
Modes of courting popularity 481
Growing preponderance of die nobility 482
Rapid growth of Roman power 483
APPENDIX.
On the poptdation of Italy in the third century b.c. . . 485
I
FOURTH BOOK.
STEUGGLE FOE THE
ASCENDANCY IN THE WEST.
TOL. II. B
CHAPTEE I.
OABTHAGE.
Opposite to the far-spreading peninsulas and deep indented CHAP.
shores of Europe and her numerous islands, stretches in a r — ^
long and uniform line the stony coast of Africa, the most Differences
compact part of the old as well as of the new world. No °f. *°^J ^^^
* * , , climate
more marked contrast can be found, in such immediate between
proximity, upon the surface of the globe, than the two and^frica
continents which form the abodes of the black and white
races of man. The solid mass of land in the sultry south,
the primeval seat of unmitigated barbarism, has remained
closed to the present day against the refinement of a
higher civilisation, whilst Europe early received the seed
of culture and unfolded the richest and most varied forms
of intellectual, social, and political life. On the east of
Africa the narrow valley formed by the NUe is. indeed
separated from the heart of the African continent, and
on the north the cheerless wastes of the interior bound a
belt of land of varying breadth along the coast which is
capable of much cultivation. These regions diflfer, how-
ever, essentially from the sea-girt islands and peninsulas
of Europe, where a milder sun and a greater variety of
climate have brought about gentler manners and richer
forms of social and political life.
The Mediterranean Sea, on whose shores the stream of Migrations
migration from east to west was arrested and divided, g^mifio
turned the Semitic races to the north coast of Africa and a»^<i Ary..n
the Indo-Europeans or Aryans to the countries of Europe ;
and although its waters could not prevent the hostile
encounters and alternating invasions of these two radically
B 2
4 EOMAN mSTOEY.
BOOK different peoples, still it has formed, during the lapse of
^ \ • ^ centuries, an immovable barrier between them, dividing
the civilised lands of Christian Europe from those of the
^ Mohammedan Barbaresks who have ai^ain sunk almost
mto savagery,
PhoBniraan We have but uncertain information with respect to the
tion^in*" Original population of the countries which extend from
Africa, Egypt to the Atlantic Ocean and from the desert to the
shores of the Mediterranean Sea. One single race of
people, the Libyans, divided into various branches, of
which the Numidians, the Mauritanians, and the Gsetulians
are the most import-ant, have had possession of these
regions from the earliest times ; and in spite of migrations
and mixing of races, the present Berbers may be considered
the direct descendants of the original population. The
nature of the soil caused considerable difference in the
mode of life and in the character of the population. In
the fruitful border-lands of the sea-coast, the Libyans led
an industrious agricultural life; the shepherd hordes of
the Numidians and Mauritanians ranged through the
steppes and deserts ; and in the recesses of the Atlas, the
Gsetulians dragged on a miserable existence. None of these
tribes possessed in themselves the elements of a higher
cultivation. This cultivation came to them from without.
During a period of many centuries, the Phoenicians, a
people distinguished by ingenuity and enterprise, made
the north coast of Africa the object of their voyages, and
there they planted numerous colonies. It would appear
that the course of these earliest explorers and founders of
cities was at first directed more to the north of the Medi-
terranean; but encountering the Greeks on the shores
and islands of the MgesLU Sea, they retired before the
greater energy of that people, in order to find on the
coast of Africa and the western part of the Mediterranean
an undisturbed territory for the development of their
commercial and colonial policy. Thus numerous Phoeni-
cian settlements were formed on the coast of Africa, in
Spain, and in many of the western islands.
CAETHAGE. 6
The Pheenician colonies did not essentially differ from CHAP.
the Greek. Unlike the Boman colonies, they were not . — ^ ^
established by the mother country, in order to further her pomts of
political aims, to extend and strengthen her dominion, and difference
to be kept in dependence upon her. On the contrary, thePhce-
their foundation was the result of a spirit of enterprise in ^0^°^*^^
the emigrants, of internal quarrels at home, or of com- colonies,
mercial projects; and only a weak bond of affection or
interest united them with each other and with the
mother country. Nevertheless the isolated and at first
independent Phoenician cities in the west gradually grew
into one powerfdl united state; and this small Semitic
people succeeded by their concentrated and well-regulated
force in ruling for centuries over numerous populations
composed of differing races, and in stamping upon them
an impression which was recognisable ages after the fall
of the Phcenician dominion.
This union of the widely-spread Phoenician communities Bapid
into one state was the work of Carthage. No domestic ^^power
or foreign historian has explained to us by what happy o^ Caiv
circumstances, by what poUtical or military superiority *^-
on the part of the Cartha^nians, or by what states-
men or generals, this union of scattered elements was
brought about. The ancient history of Carthage has dis-
appeared even more completely than that of her great rival
Bome, and in its place we find only idle stories and fables.
Dido or Elissa, the Tyrian princess, who is said to have
emigrated fit,m her itiTe country in the ninth century
before our era, at the head of a portion of the discontented
nobility, and to have founded Byrsa, the citadel of Car-
thage, appears in the light of historical investigation to be
a goddess. The stories of the purchase of a site for the
new city, of the ox-hide cut into strips, and of the rent
which for many years had to be paid for the land to native
princes, are legends of as much worth as those of the
Boman asylum, or the rape of the Sabines. Carthage was
afc first, like Bome, an unimportant city, whose foundation
and early history could not have aroused the attention of
ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK
IV.
NatTire of
the Car-
thaginian
empire.
Elements
of weak-
ness in the
Cnrthagi-
nian state.
I
contemporary writers. She was but one among the many
Phcenician colonies, and not even the oldest Phoenician
settlement on the African coast. But the happy situation
of Carthage appears to have promoted the early and rapid
growth of the city ; which, asserting her supremacy over
her sister cities, placed herself at the head of all the settle-
ments belonging to the Phoenician race. She made con-
quests and founded colonies, and gained dominion over the
western seas and coasts by her commercial influence and
by the strength of her forces in war.
The Carthaginian empire was in its constitution not
unlike that of Rome. Both had grown out of one city as
their centre; both ruled over allies of alien and of
kindred race ; both had sent out numerous colonies, and
through them had spread their nationality. But with all
this resemblance there were causes existing which im-
pressed upon the two states widely different characteristics
and determined their several destinies.
We dare not decide whether Rome was richer than
Carthage in political wisdom and warlike spirit. Both
these qualities distinguished the two peoples in the
highest degree, developed their national strength, and made
the struggle between them the longest and most chequered
that is known in ancient history. Even we, who draw our
knowledge of the Carthaginians only from the questionable
statements of Greek and Roman writers, can arrive at a
full conviction that they were at least worthy rivals of
the Romans. The decision in the great contest did not
depend upon superiority of mind or courage. No Roman
army ever fought more bravely than that under Hamilcar
Barcas on Mount Eryx, or than the garrison of Lilybseum,
or than the Carthaginians in their last desperate conflict
with Scipio the Destroyer. The wisdom of the Roman
senate, which we cannot rate too highly, did not accom-
plish more than the senate of Carthage, which for 600
years governed the greatest commercial state in the old
world without a single fdndamental revolution. What,
then, was the decisive force which, after the long trembling
CARTHAGB.
of the balance between Bome and Carthage, turned the chap.
scale? It was the homogeneousness of the material out ^
of which the Boman state was constructed, as compared
with the varied elements wliich formed the Cartha-
ginian.^ The Eomans were Latins, of the same blood as
the Sabines, the Samnites, the Lucanians, and the Cam-
pauians, and all the other races which formed the prin-
cipal stock of the population of Italy. They were related
in blood even with their Grecian allies, and they harmonised
in a great measure with the Etruscans in their mode of
life, in political thought and religious rites. But the
Carthaginians were strangers in Africa, and they remained
so to the end. The hard soil of Africa produced an un-
impressible race, and the Semitic Phoenicians were exclu-
sive in their intercourse with strangers. Though the
Carthaginians and Libyans lived together in Africa for
many centuries, the diflference between them never dis-
appeared. With the Bomans it was different. They could
not help growing into one people with their subjects.
Difference of race rendered this impossible to the Cartha-
ginians. If they had been numerous enough to absorb the
Libyans, this fact would have been less prejudicial. But
their mother country, Phcenicia, was too small to send out
ever-fresh supplies of emigrants. The roots of their power
had not therefore struck deep enough into the soil of their
new home, and the fearfril storm which broke upon them
in the Boman wars tore them up.
To this element of national weakness was added a Geogra-
second. Italy is a compact, well-defined land. Large ™^^^°"
enough to hold a numerous population, it is not broken up
by mountains nor deeply indented by arms of the sea, like
Greece. It is surrounded on almost all sides by water,
and consequently not much exposed to the danger of
foreign encroachments. If we compare this with the
Carthaginian territory, we shall find that the long stretch
> Polybius (i. 65, § 7) points out this contrast by comparing the fjdri
cififUKTa KoX fidpfiapa of the Carthaginians with those of the Bomans, it^
8
ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK
IV.
Agricul-
ture and
trade of
Carthage.
of coast from Kyrfend to the ocean, her uncertain frontier
towards the interior of the African continent,Cher scattered
possessions beyond the sea, in Sicily, Sardinia, Malta, the
Balearic Isles and in Spain, formed a yery unsafe basis for
the formation of a powerful and durable state.
These were the weaJb: parts of Cartha&re. It has indeed
been eaid tixat the Car^ginians were merely a nation of
traders, bent on gain, animated by ne warlike spirit, and
that therefore they were doomed to succumb in the struggle
with Bome.^ But this assertion is untrue, and the in-
ference is unjust. The Carthaginians were by no means
exclusively a commercial and trading people. They prac-
tised agriculture no less than the Somans. Their system
of tillage was even more rational and more advanced than
the Roman. They had writings on husbandry which the
Boman senate caused to be translated expressly for the
instruction of the Boman people. If, therefore, peasants
possess more than the people of towns the requisite quali-
ties of good Qoldiers, (which may, however, be doubted),
still this fact would be no argument for denying that the
Carthaginians excelled in war. And indeed how could a
people have been wanting in warlike spirit who braved
the storms and rocks of every sea, who established them-
selves on every coast, and subdued the wildest and boldest
races 9 If the Carthaginians formed their armies out of
hired foreign troops and not out of citizens, the cause
is not to be found in their want of courage or deficient
patriotism. The men, and even the women, of Carthage
were ever ready to sacrifice their lives for the defence of their
homes ; but for their foreign wars they counted the blood
of citizens too dear. A mercenary army cost the state less
than an army of citizens, who were much too valuable as
artizans or merchants, as officials or overseers, to serve as
' Compare the just remarka of Yiacke {Dsr rwdU puniwAe Krieg, 1841,
p. 94) on the warlike qualities of commercial states : ' The merchants of
Carthage were no more mere shopkeepers than those merchants on the Znjdersee
and the Thames who seized the government of India.' Vineke ought to hare
added : ' and who fought yictoriously with the greatest military powers of
Europe— with Spain under Philip H., and with France under Napoleon.'
CAETHAGE. 9
common soldiers. Military service is sought only by rude CHAP.
and poor nations as a means of subsistence. The Sam- ; _ ^
nites, the Iberians, the Gktuls, and the Ligurians, and,
among the Greeks especially, the Arcadians and the rest
of the Peloponnesians, served for hire, because they were
needy or uncultivated. Love of the military service as a
profession and occupation of life is never found in the mass ,
of an advanced people where the value of labour ranks high.
We must not on this account reproach such a nation with
cowardice. The English are surpassed by no people of
Europe in bravery ; and yet in England, except the officers,
none but the lowest classes adopt a soldier's life, because
it is the worst paid. Of course in times of national enthu-
siasm or danger it is different. Then every member of a
healthy state willingly takes up arms. So it was among
the Carthaginians, and therefore we are not justified in
crediting them vdth less capacity for war than the bravest
nations of the old world.
In speaking of the Carthaginian people we must strictly Depen-
include only the Punians, that is to say, the population of trib^t^es
pure Phoenician descent. These were to be found only of Car-
in the city of Carthage and in the other Phcenician '^-
colonies, and were very few in proportion to the mass of
the remaining population. The aboriginal African race
of the Libyans inhabited the fruitful region south of
Carthage to the lake Tritonis ; these the Phoenician
settlers had reduced to complete dependence and made
tributary.' They were now the subjects of Carthage, and
their lot was not enviable. It is true that they were
personally free ; but they formed no part of the Carthagi-
nian people, and they had no rights but those which the
' It ii very improbable that, as Justin Htattta (xiz. 2), the Carthaginians,
down to the time of Darius Hystaspis, paid a ground-rent to the Libyans for
the land on which their town was built. (Compare Heeren, Ideen, ii. 1-34.)
But granted even that this statement were true, it woald not follow that (as
Hommsen says, Bom, Gesch. i. 493) they were deficient in political capacity.
No one will xenture to accuse the English people of such a defect. Yet
the East India Company continued up to the year 1827 to acknowledge the
Great Mogul as the nominal sovereign of India, and allowed him to keep a
mock court at Delhi until 1857.
10
ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK
IV.
The Libv-
«
Phojni-
cians.
The Car-
thaginian
state.
Acknow-
ledgment
of Cartha-
^nian su-
premacy.
generosity or policy of the Carthaginianfl granted theuj.
The amount of the services which they had to render to
the state was not fixed and determined by mutual agree-
ment, by stipulation or law, but depended on the neces-
sities of Carthage ; and on this account they were always
ready to join with foreign enemies whenever the soil of
Africa became the theatre of war.
During the 600 years of Carthaginian supremacy, a
certain mingling of the races of the Libyans and Cartha-
ginians naturally took place. A number of Carthaginians,
citizens of pure Phoenician blood, settled among the
Libyans, and thus arose the mixed race of the Liby-
Phoenicians, who probably spread Carthaginian customs
and the Phoenician language in Africa in the same way
as the Latin colonies carried the Latin language and
Koman customs over Italy. From these Liby-Phcenicians
were principally taken the colonists who were sent out by
Carthage to form settlements, not only in Africa, but also
in Spain, Sicily, Sardinia, and the other islands. We have
no very accurate information about the Liby-Phoenicians.
Whether they were more animated by the Phoenician
spirit, or whether the Libyan nationality prevailed, must
remain undecided. It is, however, probable that, in course
of time, they assumed more and more of the Phoenician
character.
The Carthaginian citizens, the native Libyans, and the
mixed population of the Liby-Phcenicians constituted
therefore, in strictness of speech, the republic of Carthage,
in the same way as Kome, the Boman colonies, and the
subject Italian population formed the body of the Eoman
state. But the wider Carthaginian empire included three
other, elements ; the confederate Punic cities, the depen-
dent African nomadic races, and the foreign possessions.
It is a sure sign of the political ability of the Cartha-
ginians that, so far as we know, no wars arising from
jealousy and rivalry took place between the different
Phoenician colonies, like those which ruined the once
flourishing Greek settlements in Italy and Sicily. It is
CARTHAGE. 11
true that the Phoenicians were careful to exclude other CHAP,
nations from the regions where they had founded their ^ / _^
trading establishments, and Carthage may also have en-
deavoured to concentrate the trade of her African posses-
sions in Carthage itself.* But there were no wars of
extermination between diflferent cities and the Phcenician
race. All the Tyrian and Sidonian colonies in Africa,
on the islands of the western Mediterranean Sea, and in
Spain, which had in part been formed before Carthage,
gradually joined themselves to her, and acknowledged her
as the head of their nation. How this union was effected
is hidden in the darkness of the early Carthaginian history.
We may perhaps assume that the common national and
mercantile interests prompted the isolated settlements of
the far-sighted Phoenicians to a peaceful union and sub-
ordination to the most powerful state.* Thus it was
possible for a handful of men of a foreign race ' to establish
in a distant part of the world an extensive dominion over
scattered tracts of land and wild barbarian populations.
The most important city of these Phoenician confederates phcsnician
was Utica, situated at no great distance north of Carthage cities ^^
at the mouth of the river Bagradas. In the public Africa.
treaties which Carthage concluded, Utica was generally
mentioned as one of the contracting parties.^ It was
therefore rather an ally than a subject of Carthage, holding
to her the same relationship which Prseneste and some
other Italian cities bore to Eome. We have very little
information about the remaining Phoenician cities on the
' Movers, Thonizier^ ii. 2, 488. Yet it is not probable that the Cartha-
ginians, as Movers suspects, destroyed the port of Great Leptis. If they had
done so, the export of goods from Great Leptis to Carthage would hare been
confined to the long and tedious road by land, which of course would hare
resulted in a loss to the Carthaginian traders. Many of the famous ports of
antiquity were silted up in the course of ages, and among them, no doubt, that
of Great Leptis, without the interference of man.
' At least nothing is known of a forcible subjection of the smaller Phcenician
settlements to Carthage.
' The English dominion in India is to some extent analogous; but the
Anglo-Indians have the whole power of the mother country to back them.
* Folybius, iii. 24.
12
ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK
IV.
The Nu-
midiana.
Foreign
r
north coast of Africa. None of them were of such im-
portance as to be placed in the same rank with Carthage
and Utica. They were bound to pay a fixed tribute and
to famish contingents of troops, but they enjoyed self-
government and they retained their own laws.
On the south and west of the immediate territory of the
Carthaginian repubUc lived various races of native Libyans,
who are commonly known by the name of Numidians.
But these were in no way, as their Greek name (* Nomads ')
would seem to imply, exclusively pastoral races. Several
districts in their possession, especially in the modem
Algeria, were admirably suited for agriculture. Hence
they had not only fixed and permanent abodes, but a
number of not unimportant cities, of which Hippo and
Cirta, the residences of the chief Numidian princes, were
the most considerable. Their own interest, far more than
the superior force of the Carthaginians, bound the chiefs of
several Numidian races as allies to the rich commercial
city. They assisted in great paxt in caxrying on the com-
merce of Carthage with the interior parts of Africa, and
derived a profit from this forwarding trade. The military
service in the Carthaginian armies had great attractions
for the needy sons of the desert, who delighted above all
things in robbery and plunder ; and the light cavalry of
the Numidians was equalled neither by the Bomans nor by
the Greeks. A wise policy on the part of Carthage kept
the princes of Numidia in good humour. Presents, marks
of honour, and intermarriage with noble Carthaginian
ladies, united them with the city, which thus disposed of
them without their suspecting that they were in a state of
dependence. That, however, such an uncertain, fluctuating
alliance was not without danger for Carthage — that the
excitable Numidians, caring only for their own immediate
advantage, would join the enemies of Carthage without
scruple in the hour of need, Carthage was doomed to
experience to her sorrow in her wars with Eome.
Besides her own immediate territory in Africa, the
CAETHAGE. 13
allied Phcenician cities, and the Numidian confederates, CHAP.
Carthage had also a number of foreign possessions and ^ A^^
colonies, extending her name and influence throughout posses-
the western parts of the Mediterranean Sea. A line of S^Jfu^^
colonies had been founded on the north coast of Africa as
far as the Straits of Gibraltar, and even on the western
shore of the continent, i.e. on the coasts of Numidia and
Mauritania ; but these were intended to further the com-
merce of Carthage, not in any way to assist her in her
conquests. In like manner, the earliest settlements in
Spain and the islands of the Mediterranean, in Malta, the
Balearic and Lipari Isles, in Sardinia, and especially in
Sicily, were originally trading factories, and not colonies in
the Boman sense. But where commerce required the
protection of arms, these establishments were soon changed
into military posts, like those of the English in the East
Indies ; and the conquest of larger or smaller tracts of land
and of entire islands was the consequence. It is evident
that for several centuries the Carthaginians in Sicily were
not bent on conquest. They avoided encountering the
Greeks, they gave up the whole south and east coast,
where at first there had been numerous Phoenician colo-
nies,* and they confined themselves to a few small strong-
holds in the extreme west of the island, which they
required as trading and shipping stations. They appear
only in the fifth century to have made an attempt to get
military possession of the greater part of Sicily. But
after the failure of this attempt by the defeat at Himera-
(480 B.C.) we hear of no further similar undertakings till
the time of the Peloponnesian war.
Sardinia, on the other hand, seems early to have come Saidioia.
into the power of the Carthaginians, after the attempt of
the Greeks of Phokaia to make a settlement there had
been thwarted by the Carthaginian fleet. Sardinia was
not, like Sicily, a land that attracted many strangers. It
was not the eternal apple of discord of contending neigh-
> Movers, Phbniner, ii. 2, Z2i ff. Thocjdides, vi. 2.
14
R024AN fflSTORY.
Gades and
other
settlements
in Spain.
Constitu-
tion of
Carthage.
Points of
likeness
between
the
bonrs, like the richer sister island, and so it seems that, as
the Carthaginians found no rival there, it was acquired
without much eflPort on their part.
Gades, the earliest Phoenician colony in Spain, and the
other kindred settlements in the valley of the Bsetis, the
old land of Tartessus,^ appear to have stood in friendly
relations to Carthage. The African and Spanish Phoeni-
cians carried on an active intercourse with each other
without jealousy or mutual injury, and in war they aided
each other. At a later period, when Carthage was ex-
tending her conquests in Spain, Gades and the other
Punic places seem to have stood to her in the same re-
lationship as Utica.
Thus the Carthaginian state was formed out of elements
diflPering widely from one another in origin and geogra-
phical position. The constitution and organisation of the
state were admirably fitted for times of peace, and for
commercial and industrial development. By the activity
of the Carthaginian merchants, the varied productions of
the several districts found their markets. The different
peoples mutually supplied their wants, and could not fail
to recognise their common interest in this intercourse
with one another, and in the services rendered by Carthage.
But for the strain of a great war such a state was too
slightly framed. From the nature of things it was hardly
to be expected that it could undertake any war with suc-
cess, or survive a great reverse. But Carthage, notwith-
standing, came out victoriously from many a struggle ; and
for centuries she maintained herself as the first state in
the western sea, before she sunk under the hard blows of
the Boman legions. This result was brought about by a
wise political organisation of the state, which bound the
heterogeneous elements into one solid body.
Our information about the constitution of Carthage
comes to us indirectly through Greek and Boman authors,
and many points with respect to it remain obscure and
> Morers, Phonhier, ii. 2, 694 ff. *
CARTHAGE. 15
unintelligible in consequence, more especially its origin CHAP,
and progressive development; but its general character
is tolerably clear, and we cannot hesitate to rank it, on the Carthagi-
authority of Aristotle and Polybius, among the best of ^^^^ ^^^
•^ . . . . other con-
ancient constitutions. A striking phenomenon may here stltutions.
be noted. In spite of the radically diflPerent national charac-
ter of the Semitic Carthaginians, their political institutions,
far from presenting a decided contrast to the Greek
and Italian forms of government, resembled them strongly,
not only in general outline but even in detail. This simi-
larity led Aristotle ' to compare the constitution of Car-
thage with that of Sparta and Crete, while Polybius ^ thinks
that it resembled the Boman. This likeness may be partly
explained bj" the fact that these foreign observers .were
inclined to discover analogies in Carthage to their own
native institutions, and that they were strengthened in this
view by the employment of Greek and Roman names, just
as they were constantly recognising the Hellenic deities in
the gods of the barbarians. But without a correspondence
of outline in the constitution of these states, such a com-
parison would not have been possible, and so we are
compelled to infer that in political life the Carthaginians
were not Asiatics but Occidentals, or else had become so
through the force of circumstances.
Carthage had from the very commencement this feature Municipal
in common with the Greek and Eoman republics, that the ^Jq^ of
state had grown out of a city and preserved the municipal Carthage.
form of government. In consequence a republican adminis-
tration became necessary, that is to say, there took place
a periodical change of elected and responsible magistrates,
the people being acknowledged as the source of all political
power.
The first officers of state, who were called Kings or TheSuf-
Suffetes (a term identical with the Hebrew Shofetim, ^ ^'
judges), were chosen by the people out of the most dis-
tinguished families. If we had more particulars about
> Aristotle, Polit, ii. 8, 1. • Polybius, vi. 61.
16
ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK
IV.
The com-
mand of
the army.
the gradual growth of the constitution of Carthage, we
should probably find that these officers were at first invested
with comprehensive powers, but that in the course of time,
like the corresponding authorities in Athens, Sparta, Borne,
and other places, they became more and more restricted,
and had to resign to other functionaries a part of their
original authority. At a later period, the suffetes appear
to have discharged only religious and other honorary
functions, such as the presidency in the senate ; and per-
haps they also took some part in the administration of
justice- It is remarkable that we cannot state with cer-
tainty whether one or two sujBFetes held office at the same
time; but it would seem probable that there were always
two, as they were compared to the Spartan kings and the
Boman consuls. Still more uncertain is the duration of
their term of office. It may perhaps be taken for granted
that, if the dignity was originally conferred for life, it was
afterwards Umited to the period of a year.
The most important office, though perhaps not the
highest in rank, was that of the military commander.
This was not limited to a fixed time, and seems generally
to have been endowed with extensive, in fact almost
dictatorial power, though subject to the gravest responsi-
bility. In the organisation and employment of this im-
portant dignity, the Carthaginians proved their political
wisdom, and chiefly to this they owed their great successes
and the spread of their power. While the Romans con-
tinued year after year to place new consuls with divided
powers at the head of their brave legions, even when
fighting against such foes as Hannibal, the Carthaginians
had early arrived at the conviction that vast and distant
wars could be brought to a successful issue only by men
who had uncontrolled and permanent authority in their
own array. No petty jealousy, no republican fear of tyranny,
kept them from intrusting the whole power of the state to
the most approved generals, even if they belonged, as
repeatedly happened, to an eminent family, and succeeded
to the command as if by hereditary right. For a whole
CAKTHAGE. 17
centmy members of the Mago family were at the head of chap.
the CarthagiBian armies, and Carthage owed to their . \' .
prudence and courage the establishment of her dominion
in Sicily and Sardinia. This feature of the constitution of
Carthage stands out in boldest relief in the war of Hanni-
bal, when, according to the common view, the most
flourishing age of the state was already over. Hamilcar
Barcas, the heroic father, was followed by his heroic son-
in-law, Hasdrubal ; and Hamilcar's fame was only sur-
passed by that of his more glorious sons. None of these
men ever attempted to destroy the freedom of the republic,
while in Greece and Sicily republican institutions were
always in danger of being overthrown by successful
generals, a fate which Eome herself suffered at a later
period. The Carthaginian commanders-in-chief, like the
generals of modern history, were uncontrolled masters
in the field, but always subject to the civil authority of
the state. The statesmen of Carthage sought to obtain
their end by a strict subordination of the military to
the civil power, and by the severe punishment of
offenders; not by splitting up the chief command, or
limiting its duration. They instituted a civil commission,
consisting of members of the select council, who accom-
panied the generals to the field, and superintended any
political measures, such as the conclusion of treaties.*
Thus every Carthaginian army represented in a certain
degree the state in miniature ; the generals were the
executive, the committee of senators were the senate, and
the Carthaginians serving in the army were the people.
How far such a control of the generals was unwise or
the punishments unjust, we have no means of deciding
with our scanty means of information. But the fact
that the best citizens were always ready to devote their
energies and their lives to the service of their country
speaks well for the wisdom of tlie control and the justice
of the sentences.
' Poly bins, vii. 9.
VOL. n. 0
18
EOMAN HISTORY.
BOOK
IV.
Cartha-
ginian
timocracj.
The Car-
thaginian
senate.
In addition to the suffetes and generals, other Cartha-
ginian officers are occasionally mentioned, and these are
designated bj corresponding Latin names, such as praetors
and qnsestors. In a powerfnl, well-ordered, and compli-
cated political organism, like the Carthaginian republic,
there were of course many officials and many branches of
the administration. To hold an office without salary
was an honour, and consequently the administration
was in the hands of families distinguished by birth and
riches.
These families were represented, everywhere among the
ancients, in the senate, which in truth was the soul of the
Carthaginian state, as it was of the Boman, and which really
conducted the whole foreign and domestic policy. In
spite of this conspicuous position, which must always have
attracted the attention of other nations, we have no satis-
factory information about the organisation of the Cartha-
ginian senate. It would seem that it was numerous,
containing one or two special committees, which in the
course of time became established as special boards of
administration and justice. The criminal and political
jurisdiction was intrusted to a body of 100 or 104 members,
who probably formed a special division of the senate,
though we are by no means certain of it. According to
Aristotle,* they were chosen from the * Pentarchies,' by
which we are perhaps to understand divisions of the senate
into committees of five members each. At least it is im-
possible that the Carthaginian senate could have remained
at the head of the administration if the judicial office had
passed into other hands. But if the Hundred (or Hundred-
and-four) were a portion of the senate, and were periodically
renewed from among the greater body, they could act as
their commissioners. Through these the senate controlled
the entire political life, keeping especially the generals in
dependence on the civil authority.* The Corporation of
' Aristotle, PolU, ii. 8, § 4.
« This constitutes the similarity of the Body of One Hundred with the
Spartan Ephors, mentioned by Aristotle (Polit. ii, 8, { 2).
CARTHAGE. 19
the Hundred, which had at first been renewed by the CHAP,
yearly choice of new members, assumed gradually a more - _ / -
permanent character by the re-election of the same
men, and this may have led to their separating themselves
as a distinct branch of the government from the rest of
the senate. — ^A second division of the great council is men-
tioned, under the name of select council.' This numbered
thirty members, and seems to have been a supreme board
of administration. No information has come down to us
with respect to the choice of members, the duration of
their office, or their special ftinctions. Our knowledge,
therefore, of the organisation of the Carthaginian senate
taken altogether is very imperfect, though there can be
little doubt about its general character and its power in
the state.
The influence of the people seems to have been of little The
moment. It is reported that they had only to give their ^^^ ^'
votes where a difference of opioion arose between the
senate and the suffetes.' The assembly of the people had
the right of electing the magistrates. But that was a
privilege of small importance in a state where birth and
wealth decided the election. The highest offices of state
were, if not exactly purchasable, as Aristotle declares,'
still easily attained by the rich and influential, as in all
countries where public offices conferring interest and profit
are obtained by popular election.
In the Greek republics the people exercised their sove- Criminal
reigniy in the popular tribunals still more than in the tbn. ^^
election of magistrates. The choice of the magistrates
could, in a fully developed democracy, be effected by lot,
but only the well-considered verdict of the citizens could
give a decision affecting the life and freedom of a fellow-
citizen. These popular tribunals, which, as being guided
and influenced by caprice, prejudice, and political passions,
caused unspeakable mischief among the Greek states.
> SamctKM eoncUmm, — lArj, xzz. 16. The ytpo^ia as distinct from the
ir&yKXiiros, — ^Polybins, x. 18, ! 1. ' Aristotle, PolU. ii. 8, { 8.
• I\)lit, ii. 8, ! 6.
c2
20 ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK were unknown in Carthage.* The firmness and steadiness
^_ . ' - of the Carthaginian constitution was no doubt in a great
measure owing to the circimistance that the judicial
Board of the Hundred (or Hundred-and-four) had in their
own hands the administration of criminal justice.
Cartha- The Carthaginian state had in truth, as Polybius states,
tocracy. ^ mixed constitution like Some. In other words, it was
neither a pure monarchy nor an exclusive aristocracy nor
yet a perfect democracy ; but all three elements were com-
bined in it. Yet it is clear that one of these elements,
the aristocracy, greatly preponderated. The nobility of
Carthage were not a nobility of blood, like the Eoman
patricians ; but this honour appears, like the later nobility
in Eome, to have been open to merit and riches, as was to
be expected in a commercial city. The tendency towards
plutocracy draws down the greatest censure which Aristotle
passes upon Carthage. Some families were conspicuous
by their hereditary and almost regal influence. But, in
spite of this, monarchy was never established in Carthage,
though the attempt is said to have been made twice. No
complete revolution ever took place, and there was no
breach with the past. Political life there was in all its
fulness, and consequently also there were political con-
flicts; but these never resulted in revolutions stained
with blood and atrocities, such as took place in most of
the Greek cities, and in none more often than in the
unhappy city of Syracuse. In this respect, therefore,
Carthage may be compared with Eome ; in both alike the
internal development of the state advanced slowly with-
out any violent reaction, and on this account Aristotle
bestows on her deserved praise.* This steadiness of her
constitution, which lasted for more than 600 years, was
due, according to Aristotle,* to the extent of the Cartha-
» AristoUe, Polit. iii. 1, § 7.
« Polit. ii. 8, § 1 : tnifitToy 8i woXire/or avvrtrayfidyjis rh rhv drj/xov l^x^veoM
9tafi4y€iy iwrf rd^tt rris mMrdas koJ fi^€ ardari¥ 8 Tf ico) &{ioy c(Vc?y, yryevriireat
» Polit. ii. 8, § 9.
w^r^^r^' ' "m'M^r^m^w. ^m. ' ■ -m «. l ' -.- "L ■' .L _^ -
CAETHA0E. Si
ginian dominion over snbject territories, whereby the CHAP.
state was enabled to get rid of malcontent citizens and to . ; ,
send them as colonists elsewhere.' But it is mainly due,
after all, to the firm and wise government of the Cartha-
ginian aristocracy.
' The same advantage is enjojed at the present time by the United States,
Bod the Puritan emigrations from England had the same tendency of remoTing
the elements of discontent away from home.
22 ROMAN mSTORY.
CHAPTER IL
BIOILT.
BOOK The island of Sicily seems destined by its position to
^7' ^ form the connecting link between Europe and Africa.
Historical ^^^^st almost touching Italy in the north-east, it stretches
geography itself westwards towards the great Afirican continent,
which appears to approach it from the south with an out-
stretched arm. Thus this large island divides the whole
basin of the Mediterranean sea into an eastern and a
western, a Greek and a barbarian half. Few Greek settlers
ventured westward beyond the narrow straits between
Italy and Sicily. Etruscans and Carthaginians were the
exclusive masters of the western sea, and in those parts
where their power was supreme they allowed no Greek
settlement or Greek commerce. The triangular island
had one of her sides turned towards the country of the
Greeks in the east ; while the other two coasts, converging
in a western direction, extended into the sea of the
barbarians, and almost reached the very centre of Cartha-
ginian power. Thus it happened that the east coast of
the island and the nearest portions of the other two coasts
were filled with Greek colonies ; while the western part^
with the adjacent islands, remained in possession of the
Phoenicians, who, it seems, before the time of the Greek
immigration, had settlements all round the coast. The
greater energy of the Greeks seemed destined to Hellenise
the whole island. No native people could obstruct their
progress. The aborigines of Sicily, the Sikeli or Sikani,* no
^ The supposed difference between Sikeli and Sikani, assumed by Thucydides
(vi. 2)f Strabo (yi. 2, 4), and Dionysius (i. 22), is not real They are clearly
SICILY. 23
doubt a people of the same race as the oldest population of CHAP.
Italy, were cut off by the sea from their natural allies in a
struggle with foreign intruders, and, being confined to
their own strength alone, they could never become dan-
gerous, as the Lucanian and Bruttian barbarians were to
the Greeks in Italy. Only once there arose among them
a native leader, called Duketius, who had the ambition,
but not the ability, to found a national kingdom of Sicily.
On the whole, Sicily was destined, from the beginning of
history to modem times, to be the battle-field and the
prize of victory for foreign nations.
The origin and the development of the Greek towns in Greek and
Sicily belong, properly speaking, to the history of Greece. £*^^n*
Their wars also with Carthage, for the possession of the power in
island, have only an indirect relation with the history of ^^* ^'
Itome. We cast on them, therefore, only a passing glance.
It wiU suffice for us to see how, in consequence of the un-
steady policy of the quarrelsome Greeks and the aimless,
fitful exertions of the Carthaginians, neither the one nor
the other attained a complete and undisputed sovereignty
over the island, and how each successively had to succumb
to the judicious policy and the persevering energy of the
Bomans.
In the west of the island the Carthaginians had ancient Defeat of
Phoenician colonies in their possession, of which Motye, Lnians at "
Panormus, and Solus were the most important. The Himera.
Greeks had ventured on the south side as far as Selinus,
and on the north as far as Himera, and it seemed that, in
course of time, the last remaining Punic fortresses must
fall into their hands. Carthage desired a peaceful pos-
session for the purposes of trade and commerce, and until
the fifth century before our era had not entered upon any
great warlike enterprise. At the time of the Persian war,
however, a great change took place in the policy of Car-
thage. Taking advantage of the internal dissensions of
either one people, or branches of one people, as Sabini and Sabelli, and the
difference in the names is dialectic or accidental. See Forbiger in Fauly's Real-
EncyclopadiBt yi. 1159. Lewis, CredibilUy of Early Rojnan ^siary, i. 273.
24 ROMAN HISTOKY.
BOOK the Greeks,^ they sent for the first time a considerable
^^ — r^ — ' army into Sicily, as if they contemplated the conquest of
the whole island. This attack on the Greeks in the west
happened at the time when there was every prospect of
their mother country falling a .victim to the Persians.
But at the very time when Greek freedom came out vic-
torious from the unequal struggle at Salamis, the Sicilian
Greeks, under the command of Gelon, the ruler of Gela
and Syracuse, defeated the great Carthaginian army before
Himera, and thus put an end for a considerable time to the
Carthaginian plans of conquest.^
Preponder- Syracuse from this time became more and more the
Syracuse, l^^ad of the Greek cities. The rulers Gelon and Hiero,
distinguished not less by their military abilities than by
their wise policy, understood how to curb the excitable,
active, and restless Greeks in Sicily, and to govern them
with that kind of stedfast rule which alone seemed salutary
for them. As soon, however, as the firm government of
the tyrants gave place to what was called freedom, all
wild passions broke loose within every town in the con-
federacy of the Sicilian Greeks. The empire of SjTacuse,
which under princes as vigorous as Gelon and Hiero
might probably have been extended over the whole of
> Himera, Selinus, Mcssana, and Rhegium sided with the Carthaginians.
• Gelon's victory at Himera was a favourite topic for the vainglorious Greeks.
The Sicilian colonists naturally wished to rival the great exploits of the
mother country, and they found in the attack of the western barbarians upon
Sicily a welcome pendant to that of the Persians upon Greece proper.
(Diodorus, xi. 20.) If Mardonius led 300,000 men into battle at Platsea, the
Carthaginian army at Himera could not amount to less. For the same purpose
the fiction was invented that the battle at Himera took place on the same day
with that of Thermopylae or of Salamis. In later times it was even alleged
that the Persians and Punians made a combined attack in the east and in the
west, for the extinction of the Greek nation. The king of Persia, it was said,
embraced in his schemes of conquest Sicily as well as Greece, and as sovereign
of Phoenicia ordered the Carthaginians, the Phoenician colonists in Africa, to
attack the Sicilian Greeks. Herodotus (vii. 165) says nothing of such plans.
According to him, the war between Greeks and Carthaginians in Sicily arose
from local causes. Moreover, Carthage was far too independent, by her
geographical position and by her power, to be determined in her policy by the
wishes of her mother country, or by the dictates of the Persian monarch.
Compare Dahlmann, Forschungen su Rerodot^ 186.
SICILY. 25
Sicily, was broken up. Every town again became inde- CHAP.
pendent. The arbitrary measures of the Syracusan princes — / .
were upset, democracy re-established, the expelled citizens
brought back, and the friends of the tyrants banished. In
spite of these revolutions, involving confiscation of pro-
perty and confusion of all kinds, Sicily enjoyed great
prosperity* for half a century, and the Carthaginians made
no attempt to extend the bounds of their dominion in the
island. It was only after the unhappy termination of the
Athenian expedition against Syracuse, when this town,
victorious but exhausted, and distracted by internal dis-
sensions, continued the war against Athens in the ^gean
Sea, that the Carthaginians, seventy years after their great
defeat at Himera, again made a vigorous attack on the
Greek cities of Sicily.
Segesta, which was only partially Greek, and had already Destnic-
caused the interference of the Athenians in the internal Agrigen-
affairs of the island, invoked Carthaginian aid in a dispute ^^™-
with the neighbouring town Selinus. Hamilcar, the grand-
son of the Hannibal who had fallen at Himera, landed in
Sicily with a large army, and conquered in quick succes-
sion Selinus and Himera, destroying them with all the
horrors of barbarian warfare. But the greatest blow for
the Sicilian Greeks was the fall of Akragas or Agrigentum,
the second town of the island, whose glorious temples and
strong walls were overthrown, and whose rich works of
art were carried away to Carthage. Since the taking of
Miletus by the Persians, such a dreadful misfortune had
happened to no Hellenic town. The Punic conquerors
pushed on irresistibly along the southern coast of the
island towards the east.
The Syracusans had tried in vain to arrest them at Tyranny of
Agrigentum. The failure of their undertaking caused an iJi^™}^
internal revolution, which overthrew the republic and
gave monarchical power to the elder Dionysius. But
even Dionysius was not capable of stemming the further
* Cortius, Griech, Geach, ii. 487 ff.
26
ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK
IV.
Victories of
Bionysiiu.
Siege of
Syracuse.
progress of the Carthaginians. Gela fell into their hands
and Camarina was forsaken bj its inhabitants. The whole
of the south coast of the island was now in their power,
and it seemed that Syracuse would experience the same
fate. At length Dionjsius succeeded in concluding a
treaty, whereby he gave over to them all the conquered
towns, being himself recognised by them as governor of
Syracuse. The Carthaginians now permitted the exiled
inhabitants and other Greeks to return to the towns that
had been destroyed. It seems never to have occurred to
them that it was desirable to garrison the fortified places
which they had taken, or to colonise them in the manner
of the Bomans. Probably they fancied that, having en-
tirely broken and humbled their enemies in the field, they
would be able, from their maritime stronghold of Motye,
to overawe the conquered districts and to keep them in
subjection.
But they had estimated the energy of the Greeks too
low. Dionysius, established in his dominion over Syracuse,
prepared himself for a new war against Carthage, and in
397 B.O. suddenly invaded the Carthaginian territory.
His attack was irresistible. Even the island town of
Motye, in the extreme west of Sicily, the chief stronghold
of Carthaginian power, was besieged and finally taken by
means of an artificial dam which coimected it with the
mainland.
The conquests of the Greeks, as those of the Carthagi-
nians, in Sicily, were but of short duration. Dionysius
retaliated for the destruction of Greek towns by laying
waste Motye and severely punishing the surviving inhabi-
tants ; but when he had done this he withdrew, to occupy
himself with other schemes, as if Carthage had been
thoroughly humbled and expelled from Sicily. In the
following year, however (396 b.c.), the Carthaginians again,
with very little trouble, retook Motye,^ and advanced with
* The dams by which Bionysius had joined the island town with the main-
land of sadly had probably destroyed the advantages of its inaukr position.
Consequently the Carthaginians did not restore Hotye. They made Lilybsnm
SICILY. 27
a large armj and fleet towards the east of the island, CHAP.
where they conquered Messana, and, after driving Diony- ,_ / _>
sins back, besieged him in Syraxsuse.
So changeable was the fortune of war in Sicily, and so Piratical
dependent on accidental circumstances, that the question ofDionj-"*
whether the island was to be Greek or Carthaginian was s^^*
almost within the space of one year decided in two
opposite ways, and the hopes of each of the two rivals,
after having risen to the highest point, were finally
dashed to the ground. The victorious career of Carthage
was arrested by the walls of Syracuse, just as, twenty
years before, the flower of the Athenian citizens had
perished in the same spot. A malignant distemper broke
out in the army of the besiegers, compelling Himilco, the
Carthaginian general, to a speedy flight and to the dis-
graceful sacrifice of the greater part of his army, which
consisted of foreign mercenaries. Dionysius was now
again, as with one blow, undisputed master of the whole of
Sicily, and he had leisure to plan the subjection of all the
Greek towns to the west of the Ionian Sea. He under-
took now his piratical expeditions against Caulonia, Hip-
ponium, Croton, and Bhegium, which brought unspeak-
able misery on these once-flourishing cities at the very
time when they were being pressed by the Italian nations,
the Lucanians and the Bruttians. The bloody defeat
which the Thurians suffered from the Lucanians, and
the conquest of Bhegiam by Dionysius,* accompanied with
the most atrocious cruelty, were the saddest events of this
period, so disastrous to the Greek nation. If Dionysius
had pursued a national policy, and, instead of allying him-
self with the Lucanians to attack the Greek cities, had
marshalled the Greeks against Carthage, he would most
probably have become master of aU Sicily. But the faint-
hearted manner in which he carried on the war against
their chief stronghold, and changed it from an open and insignificant place
into a fortress of the first magnitude. See Schubring uber Motye-Lilybseum
in PMlaloffus, 1866.
' At the time of the burning of Kome by the Gauls.
28 ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK the enemies of the Greek race stood oat in strong contrast
IV.
, with the perseverance which he exhibited in enslaving
his own countrymen. After short hostilities (383 B.C.), he
concluded a peace with Carthage, in which he ceded to her
the western part of Sicily as far as the river Halycus.
Then, after a long pause, he attempted, for the last time,
an attack on the Carthaginian towns, conquering Selinus,
Entella, and Eryx, and laying siege to Lilybseum, which,
after the destruction of Motye, had been strongly fortified
by the Carthaginians and waa now their principal strong-
hold in Sicily. After he had been driven back from
Lilybffium, the war ceased, without any treaty of peace.
Dionysius died shortly afterwards.
The The Carthaginians took no advantage either of the in-
bionysius Capacity of his son, the younger Dionysius, or of the
fwn ^*™°" feebleness of Syracuse in the Dionian revolution, to extend
their dominion further. It was only when Timoleon of
Corinth ventured on the bold scheme of restoring the
freedom of Syracuse that we find a Carthaginian army
and fleet before the town, with the intention of anticipat-
ing Timoleon and of conquering Syracuse for Carthage
after the overthrow of the tyrant Dionysius. Never did
they seem so near the accomplishment of their long-
cherished hope. Being joined with Hiketas, the ruler of
Leontini, they had already made themselves masters of the
town of Syracuse. Their ships had taken possession of the
harbour. Only the small fortified island Ortygia, the key
of Syracuse, was still in the hands of Dionysius, who,
when he could no longer maintain his ground, had the
choice to which of his enemies he would surrender, to
Timoleon or to the Carthaginians and Hiketas. The good
fortune ^ or the wisdom of Timoleon carried the day. He
obtained by agreement the possession of Ortygia and he
sent Dionysius, with his treasures, as exile to Corinth.
Again the Carthaginians saw the prize of all their efforts
snatched from their hands. They feared treason on the
* The expedition of Timoleon is remarkable for the unusual number of
supernatural events. Plutarch's biography is a continuous story of miracles.
SICILY. 29
part of Hiketas, their Greek ally ; and their general Mago CHAP.
II.
sailed back to Africa. There he escaped by a voluntary >,
death the punishment which the Carthaginian senate in-
flicted only too often on unfortunate generals. His body
was nailed to the cross.
Timoleon crowned his glorious work of the deliverance Barren
of Syracuse and the expulsion of all the tyrants of Sicily Thno?a)n.
by a brilliant victory over a superior Carthaginian army
on the river Krimesus. This defeat was disastrous to
Carthage because they lost in it a select body consisting
of citizens from the first families. Yet the result of this
much lauded victory was by no means the expulsion of
the Punians from Sicily. It seems not even to have
produced a change in the respective strength of the two
beUigerents or an alteration of boundary between the
Greek and Carthaginian territory.
Between the overthrow of the second Dionysius and TyranDyof
the dominion of Agathokles, the most noxious and most 2ies.
hateful of her tyrants, Syracuse enjoyed, for twenty-two
years, democratic government and comparative rest, as well
as peaceful intercourse with the Carthaginians and with
the other Sicilian Greeks. But the worthless Agathokles
had hardly seized the monarchical power which seemed
to have been put down for ever in Syracuse by the noble
Timoleon, than the national war between Greeks and
Punians again broke out, and was carried on with a
violence and animosity hitherto unknown. After one de-
cisive victory over Agathokles, the Carthaginians for the
third time besieged Syracuse with an army and fleet,
and for the third time they seemed on the point of gain-
ing the last stronghold of Greek independence in Sicily.
Agathokles then, with true Greek ingenuity and with
the recklessness of despair, ventured upon an enterprise
which thwarted all the calculations of the Carthaginians.
He burst forth with his ships out of the blockaded har-
bour of Syracuse, and landed an army on the coast of
Africa. Attacked in their own country, the Carthaginians
were compelled to relinquish all thoughts of conquering
80
ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK
IV.
Later ez-
peditiona
of Aga-
thokles.
Syracuse. For four years AgathoUes conducted the war in
Africa with extraordinary success. He not only conquered
many of the country towns of the Carthaginians, and lived
in luxury from the rich spoils of that fruitful and flourish-
ing land, but he took possession also of the most impor-
tant Phoenician towns under the dominion of Carthage,
such as Thapsus, Hadrumetum, and even Utica and Tunis,
in the immediate neighbourhood of Carthage. Internal
foes joined themselves to the foreign enemy, who attacked
the state in its most vulnerable part. The treachery of the
general Bomilcar, and the revolt of subjects and allies,
reduced the proud Punian town almost to ruin. There
was now no longer any trust in the power of money or
their foreign mercenaiies. The citizens of the town them-
selves, and the men of the noblest blood, were called out
and courageously sacrificed. The perseverance of Carthage
prevailed. Agathokles escaped with difficulty to Sicily,
and two of his sons, with his whole army, fell as victims to
a recklessness which had not sufficient power to back it.
Thus failed an undertaking on which Begulus ventured
in the first Punic war with a similar result, and which
succeeded only in the second war with Bome after the
strength of Carthage was so completely exhausted that
even a Hannibal could not restore it.
The expedition of Agathokles had no influence on the
relative position of the Carthaginians and Greeks in Sicily.
Affcer many fruitless struggles the treaty of peace left the
Carthaginians in possession of the western portion with
the dominion over Selinus and Himera. Agathokles, like
his predecessors Hiero and Dionysius, now formed other
schemes than that of the conquest of all Sicily. He made
several expeditions into Italy and into the Adriatic .Sea,
conquered even the island of Corcyra, causing destruction
and ruin wherever he appeared, without gaining a single
permanent conquest. When at length, at a great age, he
was murdered by his grandson, new dissensions broke out,
as was usually the case after the fall of a tyrant. Sicily,
now thoroughly exhausted, and retaining less and less of
SICILY. 81
her Greek nationality, sought a protector from Pyrrhus, CHAP,
king of the semi-barbarous Epirots. How this last
attempt to unite the Sicilian Greeks and to free the island
from Carthaginians failed has been already related.'
The freedom of the Greeks in the mother country had
already perished. In Sicily, too, its days were numbered.
Bat the prize for which the Carthaginians had contended
so long was not to be gained by them. A new competitor
appeared. The conquerors of Pyrrhus followed in his
footsteps with more energy and success, and, affcer a long
and changeful struggle, gave to the afflicted Sicilians peace
and order, in exchange for their lost independence.
' See Yol. i. ch. zri.
32
BOMAN HISTOKY.
CHAPTER ni.
THE FIRST PUNIO WAR, 264-241 B.O.
BOOK
IV.
Fortunes
of Zankle
or Mes-
sana.
First Period. — To the captv/re of Agrigentum, 262 B.C.
In no country inhabited by Greeks had the national
prosperity suffered more than in Sicily by violent and de-
structive revolutions, by a succession of arbitrary rulers and
atrocious tyrants, by the destruction of towns, and by the
transplantation or butchery of their inhabitants. Even
the older and milder rulers of Syracuse, Gelon and his
brother Hiero, practised, with the greatest recklessness, the
Asiatic custom of transporting whole nations into new
settlements, and the confiscation and new division of
land. Their successors — especially the first Dionysius and
the infamous Agathokles — ^vied with the Punic barbarians
in cruelties of the most revolting kind. All towns in the
island experienced, one after another, the horrors of con-
quest, plunder, devastation, and the murder or slavery of
their inhabitants. The noble temples and works of art
of a former age sank in ruins, the walls were repeatedly
pulled down and built up again, and the fruitful fields laid
Tmste. We can scarcely imagine how it was that Greek
civilisation and even a remnant of prosperity could survive
these endless calamities ; and we should welcome any
evidence which might tend to prove that historians
depicted in too glaring colours the troubles which were
experienced in their own time. But the gradual decline of
Greek power in all parts of the island, the growth of bar-
barism, and the helplessness of the people, are too clearly
to be discerned to leave any doubt of the truthfulness of
the picture as a whole.
THE FIRST PUNIC WAR.
83
CHAP.
III.
First
Pkriod.
264-262
B.C.
• There was no town in the island which during three cen-
turies had been visited by greater calamities than Messana.*
Messana had been originally a Chalcidian colony, but was
seized by a band of Samians and Milesians, who, being
expelled from their homes by the Persians, went to Sicily
and drove away or enslaved the old inhabitants of the
town. Shortly after this the town fell into the hands of
Anaxilaos, the tyrant of Ehegium, who introduced new
colonists, especially exiled Messanians, and changed the
original name of Zankle into Messana. In that devas-
tating war which the Carthaginians carried on with the
elder Dionj-sius, and in which Selinus,Himera, Agrigentum,
Gela, and Camarina were destroyed, Messana suflFered the
same fate, and its inhabitants were scattered in all direc-
tions. Rebuilt soon after (396 B.C.), and peopled with new
inhabitants by Dionysius, the town seemed in some measure
to have recovered, when it fell (312 b.o.) into the power of
Agathokles. It shared with all the other towns of the
island the fate which this tyrant brought on Sicily ; yet in
spite of the many blows it suffered, it appears to have
reached a certain degree of importance and prosperity,
which must be attributed in part at least to its unrivalled
position in the Sicilian straits. After the fall of Agatho-
kles a new misfortune befell it, and Messana ceased for
ever to be a Greek colony. A band of Campanian mer-
cenaries, who called themselves Mamertines, that is, the
sons of Mars, and who had fought in the service of the
Syracusan tyrants, entered the town, on their way back
to Italy, and were hospitably entertained by the inhabi-
tants. But, instead of crossing over to Ehegium, they fell
upon and murdered the citizens, and took possession of
the place.*
Messana was now an independent barbarian town in Capture of
Sicily. Shortly after, a Roman legion, consisting of ^*^^8'*^"^
* HermAnn, Griech, Siaatsalterthiimfrf § 83.
• A similar act of infamous barbarity had been perpetrated before by the
tyrant Dionysius the elder. Having ttiken Cataua by treason, and having
plundered and de8troye<l it, he sold the inhabitants as slaves, and handed over
the place to a band of Campanian mercenaries. — Diodorus, xir. 15.
VOL. II. D
84 ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK Campanians, fellow-countiymen of the Messanian free-
booters, imitated their example, and by a similar act of
by Roman 8'trocity took possession of Ehegium on the Italian side of
mutineers, the straits." United by relationship and common interests,
the pirate states of Messana and Bhegium mutually
defended themselves against their common enemies, and
were for a time the terror of all surrounding countries, and
especially of the Greek towns.
Hiero, After Ehegium had been conquered by the Bomans,' the
Syracuse, day of punishmeut seemed to be approaching also' for the
Mamertines of Messana. Apart from the consideration
that the possession of Messana would be a great acquisition
to the state of SjTacuse, that city, as the foremost Greek
community in Sicily, was called upon to avenge the fate
of the murdered Messanians, and to exterminate that band
of robbers, which made the whole island unsafe. Hiero,
the leader of the Syracusan army, was sent against them.
He began by ridding himself of a number of his mer-
cenaries who were troublesome or whom he suspected of
treason. He placed them in a position where they were
exposed to a hostile attack &om the enemy, and left them
without support, so that they were all cut down.' He then
enlisted new mercenaries, equipped the militia of Syracuse,
and gained a decisive victory over the Mamertines in the
field, after which they gave up their predatory excursions
and retired within the walls of Messana. The success of
Hiero made him master of Syracuse, whose citizens had no
means of keeping a victorious general in subjection to the
laws of the state. Fortunately, Hiero was not a tyrant
like Agathokles. On the whole, he governed as a mild
and sagacious politician, and succeeded, under the most
difficult circumstances, when placed between the two great
belligerent powers of Bome and Carthage, in maintaining
> Vol. i. p. 618. • Vol. i. p. 640.
* It was not the first time that mercenary troops were exposed to snch treason
at the hands of Syracusan generals. During the siege of Syracuse by the
Carthaginians, the first Dionysius had acted in the same manner (Diodoms,
ziv. 72). Afterwards, the Carthaginians, and cvon the Ilomans, did the same.
^Plutarch, Fab, Max. 22.
THB FIEST PimiC WAB.
85
CHAP.
lU.
FiBST
PBBIOD,
264-262
B.C.
the independence of Syracuse, and in securing for his
native town during his reign of fifty years a period of
reviving prosperity. First of all, he aimed at expelling the
Italian barbarians from Sicily, and at establishing his
power in the east of the island by the conquest of Messana.
The Mamertines had taken the part of the Carthaginians
during the invasion of Pyrrhus in Sicily, and with then-
assistance had successfully defended Messana. The attack
of Hiero, who in some measure was at the head of the
Greeks, as the successor of Pyrrhus, forced the Mamertines
to seek aid from a foreign power, after their most faithful
confederates, the mutineers of Bhegium, had perished by
the sword of the Romans or the axe of the executioner.
They had only the choice between Carthage and Bome.
Each of these states had its party in Messana. The Bomaus
were further off than the Carthaginians, and perhaps the
Mamertines were a&aid to ask for protection from those
who had so severely punished the Campanian freebooters
of Ehegium. A troop of Carthaginians under Hanno^was
therefore admitted into the citadel of Messana, and thus
the long-cherished wish of Carthage for the dominion over
the whole of Sicily seemed near its fulfilment.
Of the three strongest and most important places in ReiationB
Sicily, they had now Lilybseum and Messana in their pos- t^age to
session, and thus their communication with Africa and Kon^e-
Italy was secured. Syracuse, the third town of importance,
was very much reduced and weakened, and seemed inca-
pable of any protracted resistance. Carthage had long been
in friendly relations with Bome, and these relations had
during the war of Pyrrhus taken the form of a complete
military alliance. Carthage and Bome had, apparently, the
9ame interests, the same friends, and the same enemies. On
the continent of Italy, Bome had subjected to herself all
the Greek settlements. What could be more natural or
more fair than that the fruits of the victory over Pyrrhus
in Sicily should be reaped by Carthage ? The straits of
Messana were the natural boundary between the commer-
cial city, the mistress of the seas and islands, and the
D 2
86
KOMAN HISTORY.
UOOH
IV.
Jealousy
of Rome
for Car-
thage.
continental empire of the Eomans, whose dominion seemed
to have found its legitimate termination in Tarentum and
Bhegium.
But the friendship between Eome and Carthage, which
had arisen out of their common danger, was weakened
after their common victory and was shaken after the
defeat of Pyrrhus at Beneventum. It was by no means
clear that Cartfiage was free from all desire of gaining
possessions in Italy. The Romans at least were jealous
of their allies, and had stipulated in the treaty with Car-
thage, in the year 348 B.C.,' that the Carthaginians should
not found or hold any fortresses in Latium or indeed
in any part of the Soman dominions. They showed
the same jealousy when in the war with Pyrrhus a Car-
thaginian fleet entered the Tiber, ostensibly for the assist-
ance of Rome, by declining the proffered aid. When a
Carthaginian fleet showed itself before Tarentum in 272 B.C.,
and seemed about to anticipate the Romans in the occupa-
tion of this town, they complained formally of a hostile
intention on the part of the Carthaginians.^ The Cartha-
ginians denied having this intention, but the Romans
nevertheless had good reason to be on their guard, and to
entertain fear of Carthaginian interference in the affairs of
Italy as well as jealousy of their powerful neighbour, who
had now got a firm footing in Spain and governed all the
islands of the Sardinian and Tyrrhenian seas.' While this
feeling was prevalent in Rome, an embassy came from the
Mamertines, commissioned to deliver over to Rome Messana
and the territory belonging to it,* a present which indeed
involved the necessity of first clearing the town of the
* This oldest commercial treaty between Rome and Carthage is erroneously
placed by Poly bins (iii. 22) in the year 609 b.c. See Momm sen's Chronologir,
320 f. The treaty was a kind of international navigation act, intended to
keep down foreign competition. The second treaty shows this intention still
more clearly.
' It seems that the Romans looked upon or pretended to look upon ihis
interference of the Carthaginian fleet as a breach of the treaty of friendship
between the two nations, and that they made use of it to justify their war
against Carthage. Liry (xxi. 10) makes Hanno say, in the Carthaginian senate :
' Taiento, id est> Italia non abstinueramuA ex foedere.'
• Polybius, i. 10, § 8. * Poly bins, i. 10, § 2.
THE FIRST PUNIC WAR. 87
Carthaginians and then of defending it against them.* CHAP.
The Carthaginians, it appears, had made themselves ob- . ,_' ,
noxious since they had had possession of the citadel of _^^^t
Messana, and the Roman party felt itself strong enough 264-262
to take the bold step of invoking the aid of the fiomans. ^'^'
But for Borne the decision v^as a difficult one. There Resolution
could hardly be any doubt that to grant the request of Romans to
the Mamertines would be to declare war against Car- ^^^^
° Mamer-
thage and Syracuse, and that such a war would tax the tines of
resources of the nation to the utmost. In addition to '^®®**'^*"
this the proposal of the Mamertines was by no means
honourable to Rome. A band of robbers offered dominion
over a town which they had seized by the most outrageous
act of violence ; and this offer was made to the Romans,
who so recently had put to death the accomplices of the
Mamertines for a similar treachery towards Rhegium.
Moreover, the assistance of the Romans was called in
against Hiero of Syracuse, to whom^ they were indebted
for aid in the siege of Rhegium, and at the same time
against the Carthaginians, their allies in the scarcely ter-
minated war with Pyrrhus. Long and earnest were the
deliberations in the Roman senate ; and when at length
the prospect of extension of power outweighed all moral
considerations, the people also voted for an undertaking
which seemed to promise abundant spoils and gain.*
' According to Zonaras (viii. 0), the Mamertines had first apph'ed to the
Boraans for aid, and had not received the CartliaginiiinH into their town until
they despaired of a-ssistance being sent from Kome. There are great dis-
crepancies in the accounts of Polyhius and Zonaras, from which it is evident
that they followed different authorities. Zonaras, or rather Dio Cassius, whom
he copied, perhaps followed Philinus, whilst Polybius made use of this writer
chiefly for the purpose of testing the diverging statements of Fabius Pictor. The
two hietoriane, Philinus and Fabius, had written the history of the First Punic
War respectively from the Carthaginian and the Roman point of view, and had
thereby become one-sided and partial. Polybius was more independeut in his
judgment; still we may reasonably doubt that he always succeeded in dis-
oDtangling the truth from the conflicting evidence which was accessible
to him.
' Polybius (i. 11) reports that the senate did not finally resolve upon war
but left the decision to the people. This statement is unintelligible, for
Bccording to the constitutional law and practice the final decision always rested
&8
ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK
IV.
Change
in the
character
of Roman
histoTj.
Relative
strength of
However, if the decision was not exactly honourable, neither
could it, from the Eoman point of view, be condemned.
The surprise of Messana by the Mamertines was, as far as
Eome was concerned, different from the act of the Cam-
panian legion in Bhegium ; the latter, being in the service
of the Bomans, had broken their military oath, and had
been guilty of mutiny and open rebellion. On the other
hand, the Mamertines in Sicily were, a« regarded the
Eomans, an independent foreign people. They had wronged
neither Bome nor Eoman allies or subjects. However
atrocious their act had been, the Eomans were not entitled
to take them to account for it, nor called upon to forego
any political advantages merely because they disap-
proved of the deed. The unblushing desire for extension
and conquest needed no excuse or justification in antiquity ;
and Eome in particular, by reason of her former history
and organisation, could not stop short in her career of
conquest, and pause, for moral scruples at the Sicilian
straits.
A new era begins in the history of Eome with the first
crossing of the legions into Sicily. The obscurity which
rested on the wars of Eome with Sabellians and Greeks
disappears not gradually but suddenly. The Arcadian
Polybius, one of the most trustworthy of ancient writers,
and at the same time an experienced politician, has left
us a history of the First Punic War drawn from contempo-
rary sources, especially Philinus and Fabius Pictor, written
with so much fulness that now, for the first time, we feel a
confidence in the details of Eoman history which imparts
true interest to the events related and a real worth to the
narrative.
The first war with Carthage lasted twenty-three years,
with the people. In no case could the senate resolve upon war without the
consent of the people. Polybius does not say that the majority of the senate
was against the war. He wished only to convey the impression that the
discredit, inseparable from the Boman policy, was attributable not to the
senate, but to the people. It is the old story over again. The dirty work is
to be done by the lower class of people, not by the nobility. Comparo
vd. i. p. 229.
THE FERST PUNIC WAR. 39
jfrom 264 to 241 B.C. The long duration of the struggle CHAP,
showed that the combatants were not unequally matched. _ , ' _^
The strength of Eome lay in the warlike qualities of her p^^^^
citizens and subjects. Carthage was immeasurably superior 964-262
in wealth. If money were the most important thing in war, ^'^'
Bome would have succumbed. But in the long war, which ?°'?^"^
dried up the most abundant resources, the diflFerence be-
tween rich and poor gradually disappeared, and Carthage
was sooner exhausted than Eome, which had never been
wealthy. The diflference in the financial position of the
two states was the more important, as the war was
carried on not only by land but also by sea, and the equip-
ment of fleets was more expensive than that of land
armies, especially for a state like Eome, which now for
the first time appeared as a maritime power. It must
not, however, be forgotten that the naval and financial
strength of all the Greek towns in Italy, and also of Syra-
cuse, was at the disposal of the Eomans. If they are less
frequently mentioned in the course of the war than might
be expected, it is due to the usual custom of historians,
who, out of national pride, pass over in silence the assist*
ance rendered by subordinate allies. The prize of the
war, the beautiful island of Sicily, was gained by the vic-
torious Eomans. But this was not the only result. The
superiority of Eome over Carthage was shown, and the
war in Sicily, great and important as it was, was only
the prelude to the greater and more important struggle
which established the dominion of Eome on the ruins of
Carthage.
The carrying out of the decree to give the Mamertines occupa-
the desired assistance was intrusted to the consul Appius ^1?^ ^^
/>. ^ , Mesf ana
Claudius Caudex, while the second consul was still in by the
Etruria, bringing to an end the war with Volsinii.* Romans.
Appius proved himself equal to the task in the council
as well as in the field. Although the war with Carthage
and Syracuse was, by the decision of the Eoman people,
' See vol. i. p. 479.
40 ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK practically begun, no formal declaration was made.' Appius
w , '-^ dispatched to Ehegium his legate C. Claudius, who crossed
over to Messana, with the ostensible object of settling the
diflBculty that had arisen, and invited the commander
of the Carthaginian garrison in the citadel to a conference
with the assembled Mamertines. On this occasion, the
Roman honour did not appear in a very advantageous
light by the side of the much abused Punic faithlessness.
The Carthaginian general, who had come down from tho
citadel without a guard, was taken prisoner, and was
weak enough to give orders to his men for evacuating the
fortress. The Boman party had clearly gained the upper
hand in Messana, since they felt assured of the assistance
of Rome.
Landing of Thus Rome obtained possession of Messana, even before
trllff
Romans in ^^^® consul and the two legions had crossed the straits.
Sicily. It -vvas now the duty of the Carthaginian admiral, who
was in the neighbourhood with a fleet, to prevent their
landing in Sicily. But Appius Claudius crossed during
the night without loss or difficulty, and thus, at the very
beginning of the war, the sea, on which hitherto Carthage
had exercised uncontrolled dominion, favoured the Romans.
The experience of the war throughout was to the same
eflfect. On the whole, Rome, though a continental power,
showed itself equal to the maritime power of Carthage,
and was in the end enabled by a great na.val victory to
dictate peace.
Ineffectual In possession of Messana, and at the head of two legions,
HiSTwith -A-ppius followed up his advantage with ability and bold-
the Car- ness. Hiero and the Carthaginians had been obliged, by
' the decisive act of the Romans, to make common cause
together. For the first time after 200 years of hostility,
Syracuse ent^ered into a league with her hereditary
enemies the Greeks. But the friendship was not to be of
* When this was done, we do not know. According to the old sacred law
and international practice, it was necessary to declare war in due form. Tho.
lioman fetialis, however, was not obliged to travel all the way to Carthage to
do this. lie could throw his spear over the hostile frontier in the immediate
vicinity of Home. See vol. i^ 556.
B.C.
THE FIItST PUNIC WAE. 41
long duration, thanks to the rapid success of Eome, No
sooner had Appius landed than he attacked Hiero, and
80 terrified him that he immediately* lost courage, and ^^^^
hurried back to Sj^racuse. Thus the league was practi- 264-262
cally dissolved. Appius then attacked the Carthaginians,
and the result was, that they gave up the siege. After
Messana was in this manner placed out of danger,
Appius assumed the offensive. With one blow the whole
of Sicily seemed to have fallen into his power. On the
' Polybius (i. 11, 12) minutely examines the contradictions in the reports of
Fabius Pictor and Pliilinus. Ac ording to the latter, Appius Claudius vas
worated in his encounter with Hiero and also in that with the Carthaginians.
Polybius rejects this statement, because he ciinnot on this supposition under-
stand the retreat of the allies. Accowling to Zonaras (viii. 9), who perhaps
indirectly reproduces the account of Philinus, the advantage was upon the
whole on the side of the Romans, but their two victories were by no means
decisive or unattended with loss, a fact which is apparent even from Polybius
(i. 16, § 9). The Roman cavalry was routed by that of the Syracusans, but as
their infantry was victorious, Hiero broke up and returned to S}Tacuse. In
their attack upon the Carthaginians, the Romans made an attempt to storm
their camp. On their repulse, the Carthaginians made a sally, and fol-
lowed up their advantage, but were driven back into their camp. Such
battles, in which gain and loss are divided on both sides, are most naturally
claimed as victories by both parties. The conclusion arrived at by Polybius,
that the Romans must have been decidedly victorious, because both the
Carthaginians and the Syracusans retreated, does not seem altogether cer-
tain. We know what happens in the military operations of allies, ^specially
when they have not full confidence in one another. The Carthaginians and
the Greeks had always been hereditary enemies, and were now for the first
time making common cause to repel a common enemy. Iliero could not per-
suade himself that the Romans had crossed the straits without the connivjince
or assistance of the Carthaginians (Diodorus, xxiii. ff. 4) ; and when he found
himself unexjxjctcdly attacked by them on the very morning after their landing,
and left without assistance by his allies, he lost courage, though for the moment
he had maintained his position. The Carthaginians, on the other hand, could
see no cause for Hiero's precipitate retreat but treason or cowardice ; and they
were not far wrong in such a supposition, for soon after they found Hiero
changed into an ally of the Romans. They did not therefore venture to take
the offensive, but remained in their camp in the neighbourhood of Messana,
without however being further molested by Claudius after his first attack had
failed. If Claudius could have boasted of any decided victory during this
campaign, he would no doubt have been rewarded with a triumph. Rut his
mud advance against Syracuse ended in discomfiture and loss, and the Romans
found it necessary to double the strength of their army in Sicily for the ensuing
campaign. All these considerations tend to show that, though Polybius is on
the whole a trustworthy snd conscientious guide, we are still far removed from
the historical certainty which can be obtained only from contemporary witnesses.
42
EOMAN HISTORY.
Second
campaign
in Sicily,
263 B.a
BOOK one side he penetrated as far as Syracuse, and on the
other to the Carthaginian frontier. The Eoman soldiers
were doubtless rewarded with rich spoils ; and this seemed
to justify the decision of the people, who had consented
to the war partly in the hope of such gain. But Syra-
cuse, which had gloriously resisted so many enemies,
was not to be taken at a run. Appius Claudius was
obliged to return to Messana, after experiencing great
dangers, which he could escape only by perfidy and cun-
ning. The conquest of this town, therefore, was the only
lasting success of the first campaign which Some had
undertaken beyond the sea.
In the following year, the war in Sicily was carried on
with two consula.r armies, that is, four legions, a force of
at least 36,000 men, consisting in equal parts of Romans
and allies. This army seems small when we compare the
numbers which are reported to have been engaged in the
former wars of Carthaginians and Greeks in Sicily.* It
is said that at Himera (480 B.C.) 800,000 Carthaginians
were engaged ; Dionysius repeatedly led armies of 100,000
men into the field, and now there was a force of only four
legions against the combined army of Carthaginians and
Greeks. We shall do well to test the huge exaggerations
of the earlier traditions by the more credible account
given by Polybius of the Eoman military force. The
Greeks were, it is true, in the third century much reduced,
and their force was probably only a shadow of their early
armies ; but the Carthaginians were now at the very
zenith of their power, and had certainly reason to pursue
the war in Sicily in good earnest.
On the appearance of the Soman army, the Sicilian
^^ ^^^ cities, one after another, deserted the cause of Hiero and
the Carthaginians, and joined the Romans, so that the
latter, without a struggle, obtained possession of the
greater part of the island,^ and now turned against Syra-
cuse. Then Hiero saw that, in concluding an alliance
with Carthage, he had made a great mistake, and that
Alliance of
Hiero
Borne.
* See aboYe, p. 24, note 2. ' Polybius, i. 16, g 3 f Zosaias, Tiii 9.
THE FIRST PUNIC WAR.
43
it was high time to alter his policy. His subjects shared
his desire for peace with Borne, and therefore it could not
be a difficult task to arrive at an agreement, especiallj as
it was in the interest of the Bomans to break up the
alliance between Carthage and Syracuse, and, by friend-
ship with Hiero, to have the chief resources of the island
at their disposal. Hiero accordingly concluded a peace
with Bome for fifteen years,* engaged to deliver up the
prisoners of war, to pay the sum of a hundred talents,
and to place himself completely in the position of a de-
pendent ally. The Bomans owed a considerable part of
their success to the faithful services rendered by Hiero
during the whole course of the war. He was never tired
of furnishing supplies of all kinds,^ and thus he relieved
them of part of their anxiety for the maintenance of their
troops. Nor was the Boman alliance less useful to Hiero.
It is true he reigned over Syracuse only by the per-
mission and protection of Bome, and the city suffered
grievously from the long continuation of the war. Never-
theless, it recovered from its declining state ; and Hiero,
emulating his predecessors Gelo, Hiero, and Dionysius,
could display before his countrymen all the magnificence
of a Greek prince, and appear as a candidate for the prizes
in the Greek national games.'
The Carthaginians could not maintain their advanced
position in the nei^bourhood of Messana, in fr^nt of the
two Boman consular armies, although no engagement
seems to have taken place.^ The towns also, which had
' Biodorns, zziii. ff. 5. ' Biodoros, xsiii. ff. 9.
' Foljrbius, i. 16, <pikoarcipw&v Kcd ^iAo8o|«i^ els to6s "EXXriPos.
* Neither Polybius nor Zonaras mention a battle in which the Koman con-
eu\s engaged the united forces of the Carthaginians and Sjracusans. Accord-
ing to the narrative of these historians, the Sicilian towns fell one after another
into the hands of the Romans without a struggle. On the other hand, Pliny
reports {Hisi. Nat. Tii. 60), that in the year 263 B.C. Marcus Valerius Messala
caused a picture to be put up in the Curia Hostilia, which represented his
yictory over Hiero and the Carthaginians. We have here an example of the
barefaced and boundless falsification of history of which the noble families of
Bome were guilty. Belying on the evidence of Polybius, we can affirm without
hesitation that the alleged victory of M. Valerius Messala is a fiction. Butt
even the boldest family panegyrists could not venture to misrepresent events
outright before contemporary witnesses. It was necessary to wait awhile, until
CHAP.
III.
Ftbst
Pbbiod,
264-262
B.C.
Decline of
the Car-
thaginian
power in
Sicily.
44 ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK hitherto been on their side, joined the Eomans. Even
"w — ^ * Segesta, the old and faithful ally of Carthage in Sicily,
made use of its alleged Trojan origin, to ask favourable
conditions from Rome, and killed the Carthaginian gar-
rison as a proof of its attachment to its new ally. Thus,
in a short time, and without much exertion, the Eomans
gained a position in Sicily which the Carthaginians had
for centuries aimed at in vaiii.
Probable Compared with the rapid and successful action of the
CAUSt^S OI
the success Romans in the beginning of the war, the movements
S^^^® of the Carthaginians appear to have been singularly
slow and weak. Before the breaking out of hostilities,
the advantage had been decidedly on their side. They
had military possession of Messana; with their fleet they
so completely commanded the straits that in the conscious
pride of their superiority their admiral declared that the
Romans should not without his permission even wash their
hands in the sea.* The resources of almost the whole of
Sicily were at their disposal, and the communication with
Africa was at all times secure. Whether the important
city of Messana was lost by the incapacity or timidity of
Hanno, who paid with his life for his evacuation of the
citadel, or through an exaggerated fear of a breach with
Rome, or by confidence in Roman moderation, it is not
possible to decide. Nor do we know how the Romans
the memory of events had faded away, and until fiction had gradually acquired
credence enough, by dint of frequent repetition in the family circle, to venture
into publicity. There cannot be any doubt, therefore, that the date given by
Pliny f >r the public exhibition of the picture is false. Pliny thought he could
not go wrong in naming the year of the consulship of Valerius as that in which the
picture was painted, and put up in the senate-house ; and he showed here, as
on many other occasions, his want of judgment. His statement is of no value
whatever for the history of art. Like the lying epitaph of Scipio Barbatus
(see vol. i. p. 459), this alleged historical painting originated many years after
th« death of the man whose glory it was intended to perpetuate. It is one of
the proofs of the worthlessness of the Capitoline fasti, that they record a
triumph of Valerius over the Punians and Hicro, king of the Siculi. After
this proof of the unscrupulous vanity of the Valerii it is no matter of surprise
that they ascribe the first application of the name Meesala to the consul of the
year 263, though he neither took the place nor (as Seneca says : De Brevitate
Vita, 13) had the honour of defending it.
> Zonaras, viii. 9.
THE FIRST PUNIC WAE.
45
were able, in the face of a hostile fleet, to cross the straits
•with an army of 10,000 men, and in the year after with
double that number. It seems that this could not have been
easy even with the assistance of the ships of Rhegium,
Tarentum, NeapoKs, Locri, and other Greek towns in Italy,
for even the assembling of these ships in the straits might
have been prevented. The small strip of water which
separates Sicily from Italy was sufficient in modem times
to limit the French power to the continent, and, under"
the protection of the English fleet, to save Sicily for the
Bourbons. How was it that the same straits, even at the
first trial, caused the Romans no greater difficulties than
any broad river P Was the Carthaginian fleet too small
to prevent their crossing by force? Was it the result
simply of negligence, or of one of the innumerable cir-
cumstances which place warlike operations by sea so far
beyond all calculation? Apparently, Carthage did not
expect a war with Rome, and was wholly unprepared for
it. This may be inferred with tolerable certainty, not only
from the result of their first encounter with the Romans
in Messana, but also from the fact that in the second year
of the war they left Hiero unsupported, and thus com*
pelled him to throw himself into the arms of the Romans.^
The gravity of their position was now apparent, and
induced them to make preparations for the third campaign
on a more extensive scale.* For the basis of their opera-
tions they chose Agrigentum. This town, which since its
conquest and destruction by the Carthaginians in the
year 405, had alternately been imder Carthaginian and
Syracusan dominion, had by the aid of Timoleon acquired
a precarious independence, but had never recovered its
' One cause of their weakness we learn accidentally from Zonaras (viii. 0).
On the breaking oat of hostilities, the Carthaginians ciused the Italian merce-
naries who served in their army to be massacred. We are not informed of the
strength of this body of troops. If the Punic garrison of Measana consisted
of such men, who, as countrymen of the Mamertines, were favourably dis-
posed towards them, the loss of Messana is easily explained. At any rate, the
position of the Carthaginian generals was very precarious if they had recourse
to such a desperate measure as the massacre of their own troops.
» Polybius, i. 17, § 3.
CHAP,
ni.
- _i _ n g^
FlHST
Period,
264-262
B.C.
Kenewed
eflTort of
the Car-
thaginians,
262 B.C.
46
BOMAN HISTORY.
BOOK
IV,
Th6
Bomans
Agrigen-
tum.
former splendour. Situated on a rockj platean surrounded
by steep precipices at the confluence of the brooks Hjpsos
and Akragas, it was naturally so strong as to appear
impregnable at a time when the art of besieging cities
was so little advanced ; but as it was not immediately on
the coast ^ and had no harbour, it was impossible to supply
it with provisions by sea. It is therefore strange that the
Carthaginians should choose just this town for their basis,
instead of their strongest fortress, Lilybeeum. Probably,
the choice was determined by the closer vicinity of Syra-
cuse and Messana, the conquest of which they had by no
means ceased to hope for.
The consuls for the year 262, L. Postumius Megellus and
Q. Mamilius Vitulus, marched with all their forces' against
Agrigentum, where Hannibal was stationed for the protec-
tion of the magazines with an army of mercenaries so in-
ferior in numbers that he could not hazard a battle. They
set to work in the slow and tedious mode of attack which
they had learnt in Latium and Samnium, and which, when
they had superior numbers at their command, could not
fail eventually to lead to success.' Outside the town they
established two fortified camps in the east and the west,
and united these by a double line of trenches, so that they
were secured against sallies from the besieged as well as
from any attacks of an army that might come to relieve
the town. After they had cut off all communications.
1 See Haltans, Rom, Gesch. i. 160. Siefert, Akragas und sein Gebiet,
1845.
• The army must have consisted of two consular armies or four legions,
although after the conclusion of the peace with Hiero in the preceding year
the Romans had hoped that two legions would suffice for carrying on the war
in Sicily (Polybius, i. 17, § 1). Moreover, we may presume that all their allies,
especially the Synicusans and Mamertines, sent auxiliaries. To blockade so
large a town aa Agrigentum a much larger force was necessary than four
legions. According to the Agrigentine historian Philinus (quoted by Dio-
dorus, xziii. ff. 7), the army of the Bomans and their allies consisted of 100,000
men.
■ Fours years later, at the siege of Camarina, the Romans tried their own
national mode of attack, and when this failed, they employed Greek engines of
siege, supplied by Hiero, and thus succeeded in taking Camarina.— Diodorus,
xziii. ff. 9.
THE FIRST PUNIC WAR. 47
they qnietly awaited the effects of hunger, which could
not jGEbil soon to show themselves. Bj the prompt assist-
ance of their Sicilian allies, especially of Hiero, they were t£^^^
amply supplied with provisions, which were collected by 264-262
them in the neighbouring town of Erbessus. ^'^'
But when, after five months' siege, a Carthaginian army Defeat of
under Hanno marched from Heraclea to relieve the town, ^*"°®-
the situation of the Eomans began to be serious, especially
after Hanno had succeeded in taking the town of Erbessus
with all the stores in it. The besiegers now experienced
almost as much distress as the besieged. They began
to suffer want and privation, although Hiero did all that
was possible to send them new supplies. An attack on
the town promised as little success as one on the army of
Hanno, who had taken up a strong position on a hill in
the immediate neighbourhood of the Romans. The consuls
already thought of raising the siege, which had lasted
almost seven months, when fire signals from the town,
giving notice of the increasing distress of the besieged,
induced Hanno to offer battle. With the courage of
despair, the Eomans accepted it, and obtained a decisive
and brilliant victory. The Carthaginians, it appears, now
for the first time made use of elephants, which they had
learnt to apply to the purposes of war during either the
invasion of Agathokles in Africa or of Pyrrhus in Sicily.
But these animals seem on this occasion, as on many others,
to have done more harm than good. Almost all fell into
the hands of the Romans. The fragments of the Cartha-
ginian army fled to Heraclea, leaving their camp, with
rich spoils, to the victorious army.
In the night following this victory, Hannibal took Escape of
advantage of the exhaustion and confusion in the Roman [^® 9*^^^
army secretly to leave Agrigentum and to slip away un- garrison
noticed over the Roman lines. In this manner, he saved Hannibfti.
at least a part of his army, after it had been materially
weakened by hunger and desertion. But the miserable
inhabitants of the town, who doubtless had unwillingly
shared in the struggle and in the horrors of a seven
48
RO:VIAN HISTORY.
BOOK
IV.
Historical
value of
the narra-
tive.
months' siege, were doomed to pay the penalty for the
escape of the Carthaginians. They were all * sold as slaves,
and so for the second time the splendid city of Akragas
perished, after it had nearly recovered from the devasta-
tion caused by the Carthaginians. But new settlers soon
gathered again on this favoured spot. Even in the course
of the same war, Agrigentum became again the theatre of
some hardly-contested struggles between Carthaginians
and flomans ; and not until it had been conquered and laid
waste in the wars with Hannibal for the third time did it
cease to exist as a Greek town. With such persistent
energy did the Greeks cling to the spots where they had
set up their household hearths and their temples, and
where they had intrusted to the mother earth the ashes
of their dead.
The siege of Agrigentum is the first event in the
military history of Rome which is historically authenti-
cated not only in its final result but to some extent also in
the details of its progress.^ The earlier descriptions of
* According to Diodorus (xxiii. ff. 9), 25,000 in number.
' Nevertheless, much remains obscure, and the numbers especially are by
no means to be trusted. That the Komans employed not one but two consular
armies is certain beyond dispute, as it is admitted that both consuls took part
in the siege. Yet Polybius does not distinctly state this, and even suggests
the contrary by saying (i. 17) that the senate had resolved to carry on the
"War in Sicily with only one consular army. He omitted to relate that this re-
solution was subsequently modified. He also neglects altogether to mention the
Sicilian auxiliaries of the Romans, who, according to Diodorus (xxi^i. ff. 7),
swelled the whole army to 100,000 men. Moreover, we cannot ascertain the
strength of the Carthaginian garrison of Agrigentum under Hannibal. Poly-
bius (i. 18), speaking of the sufferings caused by famine, says that not less
than 50,000 men were shut up in the town. Did he include in this number
the inhabitants of Agrigentum, or only the men capable of bearing arms ? or did
he estimate the Carthaginian garrison alone at this figure ? The army of Hanno,
which came to the relief of the town, numbered, accoixiing to Philinus (quoted
by Diodorus, xxiii. ff. 8), 50,000 foot and 6,000 horse ; according to Orosius
(iv. 7), only 30,000 foot and 1,500 horse. Polybius says that but few escaped
of this army, while according to Diodorus its loss amounted only to 7,200 men.
These discrepancies, which betray their origin in the writings of Philinus and
Fabius Pictor respectively, cannot now be reconciled. We should like also to
be authentically informed of the extent of the Roman losses, which Diodorus
(xxiii. ff. 9) no doubt exaggerates by making them amount to 30,000 foot and
540 horse.
THE FIEST PUNIC WAE. 49
battles are altogether fancy pictures. Even of the battle CHAP,
of Heraclea, the first in the war with Pjrrrhus which is ^_ / _^
related intelligibly, we cannot tell for certain how far the ^'^^
narrators made nse of the notes of Pyrrhus or of other con- 264-262
temporaries and how much they actually invented. Hence ^'^'
we may measure the amount of benefit to be obtained from
studying the details of Soman military operations in the
Samnite or Volscian wars, and the innumerable descrip-
tions of sieges and battles given by Livy.
The Itomans had sat down before Agrigentum in the Extended
early part of summer. At the end of the year the consuls f^'P*®
returned to Messana. Their losses in the battles, and Romims.
from privations and sickness during a tedious siege, had
been very great ; but a glorious success had been gained.
Sicily, with the exception of only a few fortresses, was
entirely subdued ; and the Bomans, . it would seem, now
began for the first time to aim at a higher object than that
which they had had in view at the beginning of the war.*
Their ambition was now no longer restrained to keeping
the Carthaginians out of Messana. The prospect was
opening before them of acquiring the whole of Sicily; and
the prize which after centuries of bloody wars was not
attained by their haughty rival, which the rulers of
Syracuse and lastly the King of Epirus had vainly aimed
at, appeared after a short conflict about to fall into the
hands of the Boman legions as the reward of their courage
and perseverance.
Second Period, 261-255 B.C.
THE FIBST BOMAN FLEET. MYIuE. E0N0MX7S.
BEGULUS IN AFBIOA.
The war in Sicily wm, in the following year, pursued Maritime
with aU possible vigour. The two consuls of 261, L. '^P^™*^
Valerius Flaccus and T. Otacilius Crassus (cousin and thage.
brother of the consuls of 273), conquered many places in
» Polybius, i. 20, { 1.
VOL. II. E
50 EOMAN HISTORY.
BOOK the island. Bnt the incidents of this campaign proved more
and more that the Bomans without a large fleet conld not
defend such an island as Sicily, with its vast extent of
coast, against the Carthaginians who were undisputed
masters of the sea. If the towns in the interior of the
country were at the mercy of the Romans, those on the
coasts, which were far more important, were continually
exposed to the unexpected attacks of the Carthaginians
by sea. In addition to this, the Carthaginians made
use of their naval strength to send ships from Sardinia
and other of their possessions, for the purpose of harass-
ing the coast of Italy. It was easy for them, in this way,
to keep large portions of Soman territory in continual
excitement and serious danger. They would suddenly
land on the undefended coast, plunder the open country,
destroy farm-houses and plantations, carry off the in-
habitants into slavery, and retire to their ships before
a force could be collected to march against them.' The
maritime power of the Bomans and their Greek allies
was not able to put an end to such proceedings. It
seemed that the war so boldly undertaken, far from lead-
ing to a permanent acquisition of new territory, was
beginning to endanger their old possessions,
j>etemina- xJnder these circumstances, the Eomans boldly resolved
the to meet the enemy on his own element ; and indeed, there
cope with ° was no other alternative, if they did not intend to retire
^*^»go from the contest with disgrace. Eome was obliged to
encounter Carthage at sea, not merely if she wished to
overthrow and humiliate her rival, but if she meant to hold
her own ground.
The success which attended the first gpreat naval en-
gagement of the Eomans, and which surpassed all expec-
tations, inspired them with an enthusiasm which im-
parted fresh strength to their national pride. New honours
' See vol. i. p. 421. To ward off srch attacks upon the coast the Komans had
established their maritime colonies, which generally consisted of Roman citizens.
These are the forts (<f>povpal), mentioned by Zonaras (viii. 10), as lining and
protecting the coasts of Italy.
by sea.
THE FIRST PUNIC WAR.
51
and a permanent monument commemorated the victory
which restored the wavering fortunes of war even on that
element on which the Bomans had never before ventured
to meet their enemies nor to hope for success. For this
reason the resolution of the Bomans to build a large fleet,
and their first naval victory, were favourite topics for the
patriotic historians, and exaggerated accounts were the
consequence. To make the effort of the nation sfcill more
conspicuous, it was asserted that the Eomans had never
ventured on the sea before,* that they had not possessed a
single ship of war, and were wholly and entirely ignorant
of the art of building ships, or of fitting them out and
using them for military purposes. That this is a great
error it is hardly necessary to say. Though Eome ori-
ginally had no fleet worth menxioning, and left to the
Etruscans the trade as well as the dominion at sea, still,
by the conquest of Antium she acquired ships and
a serviceable harbour. Since the treaty with Naples,* in
the second Samnite war, she had Greek seamen and
Greek ship-builders at her disposal. At the same time she
sent out ships to make hostile invasions in Campania.^
In the year 311 two Boman admirals are mentioned,^ and,
as we have seen, the war with Tarentum had been caused
by the appearance of a Boman fleet before the harbour of
that town. The assertion that the Bomans were utterly
ignorant of maritime affairs becomes thus unintelligible.*
The error is quite evident, and warns us against accepting
without examination the other accounts of the building
and the manning of the first Boman fleet.
The truth which lies at the root of the narrative is this, Late
' Polybius,i. 20, { 9 : 'Then the Romans first undertook to build ships, . . .
and, vi^ont having any appliances for ship-bnilding or having ever thought
of the sea, they conceived the plan then for the first time, and went to work
wich such spirit that, without a previous trial, they ventured to attack the Car-
thaginians at sea, who were of old the first naval power, without a rival,' &c.
■ Compare Livy, xxxv. 16 : * Neapolitani ... a quibus (vos Romani) naves
ex fcedere exigitis.' Livy, zxn. 39 : ' Postremo ipse a sociis Rheginisque et a
Velia et a Pfeesto debitas ex foedere exigendo (sc. naves) classem viginti navium
eflfecit.* • See vol. i. p. 421. * See vol. i. p. 412.
* Even PolybiuB is here guilty of exaggeration.
B 2
CHAP.
111.
ShXX)ND
Period,
261-256
B.C.
52 ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK that the Bomans in the besrinmnff of the war in Sicily
had neglected their navy. They were never fond of the sea.
develop- While the mariners of other nations challenged the dan-
mentoithe ggj-g q{ ^j^g high seas with enthusiasm, the Romans never
uary. trusted themselves without trembling t^o that inconstant
element, on which their firm courage did not supply the
want of skill and natural aptitude. They had therefore
failed to take advantage of the opportunity which the
possession of the harbour of Antium offered to them of
keeping up a moderately respectable fleet. They probably
laid the burden of the naval wars as much as they could
on their Greek and Etruscan allies, and they may have
hoped at the beginning of the Punic war that they would
never need a fleet for any other object than for crossing
over to Sicily. The impossibility of entertaining such an
idea any longer was now proved, and they were obliged
to make up their minds to meet the masters of the sea on
their own element.
The build- The narrative of the building of the flrst Boman fleet is
fle^t! ^ hardly less a story of wonder than those of the regal
period ; and had the incident been recorded a few gene-
rations earlier, benevolent gods would have appeared, to
build ships for the Bomans and to guide them on the roll-
ing waves. But Polybius was a rationalist. He believed
in no divine interference, and he relates the wonderful
in a manner that excites astonishment, but does not con-
tradict the laws of nature. The decision of the Boman
senate to build a fleet was not carried out, it is said, with-
out the greatest difficulty.' The Bomans were utterly
unacquainted with the art of building the quinqueremes —
large ships of war vdth five benches for rowers, one above
the other, which formed the strength of the Carthaginian
fleets. They knew only triremes — smaller ships with three
benches for rowers, such as formerly had been used among
the Greeks. They would, therefore, have been obliged to
give up the idea of building a fleet, if a stranded Cartha-
ginian quinquereme had not fallen into their hands, which
> Polybius, i. 20, 21.
THE FIEST PUNIC WAR. 53
they used as a model.* They set to work with such zeal CHAP.
that, within two months' after the felling of the wood, a , ^ .
fleet of one hundred quinqueremes and thirty triremes was p^^
ready to be launched. They were manned by Roman 26i-26a
citizens and Italian allies who had never before handled an ^'^'
oar, and in order to gain time these men were exercised on
the land to make the movements necessary in rowing, to
keep time, and to understand the word of command. After
a little practice on board the ships, these crews were able
to go out to sea., and to challenge the boldest, the most
experienced, and most dreaded seamen of their time.
We cannot help receiving this description with some Improba-
hesitation and doubt. That it was utterly impossible to ^|j gj^^
build within the short space of sixty days a ship capable of
holding three hundred rowers and one hundred and twenty
soldiers,^ we will not exactly maintain, as we know too
little of the structure of those ships, and as old historians
who did know it thought that the feat was wonderful, and
even hardly credible,* but not positively impossible. It is,
however, surely a different thing when the story asserts
that an entire fleet of one hundred and twenty ships
* Polybius, i. 20, § 15. The same anecdote is repeated with little yariation
in the narrative of the siege of Lilybseum in the year 249, the fifteenth year of
the war. Zonaras, viii . 1 6 : KAa^tos rpt^pci $ itKrip^as (rw4\afit 9i* canwy "hyvwa
rhv KapxH^^i'tov imcKdovra ircKr^pcc ical ^apaJitiyfia to7s *PwfuUois riis irofKuriccv^s
r&p y€&p ^hrro. Polybius, in a later passage (i. 59, § 8), tells a similar story
again, referring to the yery lust year of the war. It is difficult to see how such
a fable could be invented, or find credence, for it is well known that the building
of quinqueremes had been understood and practised in Syracuse for at least a
century and a half (Biodorus, xiv. 41, 42). Supposing therefore, what is not
at all probable, that none of the Greek towns in Italy, not even Tarenturo, had
become acquainted with the build of these vessels, yet the Romans, if they
wanted a model, could surely get it easily from their allies, the Syracusans,
without waiting for the chance of a stranded Carthaginian vessel.
« Pliny, HisL Nat. xvi. 39. Florus, ii. 6.
" This was the number on board the Boman vessels in the battle of
£cnomus.
* Polybius (i. 38, § 6), speaking of the construction of a Roman fleet in three
months, in 254 b.c., says * that it is not easy to believe it.' Yet the Romans
by this time had considerable experience in shipbuilding, and the time they
took was longer by one-half. We may therefore, a fortiori^ apply the expres-
sion of Polybius to the first feat of the Romans, and say < that it is not easy
to believe it.'
64 EOMAN HISTORY.
BOOK was built in so short a time. Extensive dockyards, and
" ^ . the necessary number of skilled ship-carpenters, might
perhaps be found in a town like Carthage, where ship-
building was practised and carried on on a large scale all
the year round. These conditions did not exist in Borne ;
and we may therefore well ask whether it is probable that
all the ships of the new fleet were now newly built and
built in Bome, and, farther, whether in the Etruscan
towns, in Naples, Elea, Bhegium, Tarentum, Locri, and,
above all, in Syracuse and Messana, there were no ships
ready for use, or whether it was impossible to build any
in these places. Surely this would be in the highest
degree surprising. We know that the Bomans availed
themselves without scruple of the resources of their allies,'
and we see no reason why they should have done so less
now than at the breaking out of the wai', when they made
use of the Greek ships for crossing over to Sicily.
Conposj- ^j^Q believe, therefore, in spite of the account of Poly-
tion of tha- , , •
Roman. bius, that the greater portion of the ships of the Boman
°*^- fleet came from Greek and Etruscan towns, and were
manned by Greeks and Etruscans. The latter supposition
is even more forced upon us than the former. A few
rowers may have been drilled in the way indicated, and
mixed up with old, experienced seamen ; but how anyone
can possibly imagine that the ships were entirely manned by
crews who had learnt rowing on land is incomprehensible.
We should have to consider the art of navigation of the
ancients as in the highest degree contemptible ; we should
not be able to understand how the historians could speak
of naval powers and of a dominion of the sea ; how her
' Next to the naval sendee, the cavalry service was least congenial to the
Romans, and of this, therefore, they threw by far the greater burden on their
allies. The name for the crews was ' socii narales,' a term which shows that
the allies principally had to furnish them. The Greek towns were not obliged
to send contingents to the laud army, but they had to furnish ships and sailors
instead (Livy xxvi. 39, xxxvi. 42). As we have previously observed (vol. i.
p. 275), the Roman historians systematically omitted to mention the assistance
of their allies; yet Zonaras (viii. 14) reports that Hiero of Syracuse supplied
the consul C. Aurelius Cotta (252 b.c.) with ships. Compare also Diodorus,
xxiii. £r. 9, above, p. 51, note 2.
THE FIRST PUNIC WAB. 65
fleet could be said to constitute the glory, security, and CHAP.
greatness of Carthage, if it had been possible for a conti- , — .
nental power like Borne, without any preparation or assist- p'^^^
ance, in two months to find ships, captains, and sailors 261-255
who on their first encounter were more than a match for ^^'
the oldest naval empire. If we bear in mind that it was a
common practice among the Eoman historians to appro-
priate to themselyes the merits of their allies,^ we shall
with the less hesitation doubt the boastful stories which
teU us how the first fleet was buUt, and we shall in the end
venture to suspect that a greater, and perhaps much the
greater, part of the credit belongs to the Etruscans and to
the Italian and Sicilian Greeks.
The first undertaking of the Eoman fleet was a failure. Capture of
The consul Cn. Cornelius Scipio sailed iVith a detachment on. Corne-
consisting of seventeen ships to Sicily, and was incautious ^^ Sdpio.
enough to enter the harbour of the small island of Lipara,
which had been represented to him as ready to revolt from
Carthage. But a Carthii.ginian squadron which lay in the
neighbourhood, and blocked up the harbour in the night,
took the consul's ships and their crews, and, instead of
the expected glory, Scipio obtained only the nickname of
Asina.'
This loss was soon after repaired. The Carthaginian Battle of
admiral, Hannibal, the defender of Agrigentum, embol- ^
dened by this easy success, sailed with a squadron of fifty
ships towards the Roman fleet, which was advancing along
the coast of Italy from the north. But he was suddenly
surprised by it, attacked^ and put to flight, with the loss of
> Vol. i. p. 276.
' Poly bi us, i. 21. Macrobius, Sat i. 5. See Niebuhr, Rom. Gesch. iii.
677 ; English translation, iii. 579. Some Roman writers so represented
this incident as to make the Carthaginians appear guilty of treachery and
peijury (see Zton&T&s, viii. 10). They related that Boodes, the Carthaginian
admiral, fearing to drive the Romans to despair, iuYited Scipio and his
officers to come on board his ship for the purpose of negotiating, and then
seized them all, whereupon the Roman crews lost courage and surrendered. It
is needless to say that tliis attempt to clear Scipio of the charge of rashness
and to accuse the Carthaginians of treachery is futile and childish. Polybius
.says nothing even of a stratagem of the Carthaginians.
56 ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK the greater part of his ships. After this preliminary trial
, . ' .. of strength, the Boman fleet arrived in the harbour of
Messana; and as the consul Scipio, who was to have
taken the command of the fleet, was made prisoner, his
colleague, Cains Doilius, gave the command of the land
army to his subordinate ofScer, and without delay led the
Bopian against the Carthaginian fleet, which was de-
vastating the coast in the neighbourhood of Pelorus, the
north-eastern promontory of Sicily. The enemies met off
Myl£B, and here was fought the first battle at sea, which
was to decide whether the Boman state should be confined
to Italy, or whether it should gradually extend itself to all
the islands and coasts of the Mediterranean — a sea which
they were now to prove themselves entitled to speak of as
emphatically * their own.' ^ It is said that the Carthaginian
fleet, under the command of Hannibal, consisted of one
hundred and thirty ships. It had therefore ten more ships
than the Boman. Each of these was without doubt far
superior to the Boman ships in the manner of sailing, in
agility and speed, but more especially in the skill of the
captains and sailors, even though, as we suppose, a great
number of the Boman vessels were built and manned by
Greeks. The tactics of ancient naval warfare consisted
chiefly in running the ships against the broadside of the
hostile ships, and either sinking them by the force of the
collision, or brushing away the mass of bristling oars. For
this purpose the prows had under the water-line sharp iron
prongs called beaks {ro8tra)y which penetrated the timbers
of the enemy's ships. It was, therefore, of the greatest
importance for each captain to have his ship so completely
under his control as to be able to turn about, to advance,
or retreat with the greatest rapidity, and to watch and
seize the favourable moment for the decisive rush. To
fight from the deck with arrows and other missiles could,
in this species of tactics, be only of subordinate importance,
and therefore there was only a small number of soldiers
on board the ships by the side of the rowers.
> ' Hare nostrum.*
THE FIRST PUNIC WAR. 57
The Eomans were well aware of the superiority of the CHAP.
Carthaginians in maritime tactics. They could not hope s_ — .J— /
to vie with them in this respect. They therefore hit upon p^^^^
a plan for supplying their want of skill at sea, by a mode of 261-265
fighting which should place not ship against ship, but man
asfaiiist man, and which in a certain way should make the ^^^^
& 7 J ^ naval tac-
sea-fight very much like a battle on land. They invented tics.
the boarding-bridges.^ On the fore part of the ship, against
a mast twenty- four feet high, a ladder thirty-six feet
long was fixed, twelve feet above the deck, in such a
manner that it could be moved up and down as well as
sideways. This drawing up and down was eflPected by
means of a rope which passed from the end of the ladder
through a ring at the top of the mast on to the deck.
How the horizontal movements were produced does not
appear from the account of Polybius, who fails also to
explain how the lower end of the ladder, which was fixed
to the mast twelve feet above the deck, could be reached.
Perhaps there was a second part to the ladder fixed to it
with hinges, leading from the deck up towards the mast,
and serving at the same time to move the ladder all round
the mast. The ladder was so broad that two soldiers
could stand abreast on it. Bailings right and lefb served
as a protection against missiles and against the danger of
falling. At the end of the ladder was a strong pointed
hook bent downwards. If the enemy approached near
enoagh, they had only to let go the rope which held the
ladder upright. If it fell on the deck of the hostile ship,
the hook penetrated the timbers and held the two ships
together. Then the soldiers ran from the deck along the
ladder to board, and the sea-fight became a hand-to-hand
engagement.'
When the Carthaginians under Hannibal perceived the Defeat of
> It 18 not stated who web the real inventor. We should like to know whether
it was a Boman or a Greek.
' The description which Polybius (i. 22) gives of the bo€irdiDg-bridges is the
only one which we have, and it is not sufficiently clear and complete, so that
doubts remain concerning some parts of the apparatus. See Haltaus, Gtsch. der
Bomer, Beilage, pp. 607-628.
68 BOMAN HISTORY.
BOOK Boman fleet, they bore down upon it and began the battle,
confident of an easy victory. But they were sadly dis-
tbeCar- appointed. The boarding-bridges answered perfectly.
thaginiAM. Fifty Carthaginian vessels were taken or destroyed, and a
great number of prisoners were made. Hannibal himself
escaped with difficulty and had to abandon his flag-ship,
a huge vessel of seven rows of oars, taken in the late war
from King Pyrrhus. The remainder of the Carthaginian
vessels took to flight. If the joy at this first glorious
victory was great, it was fully justified. The honour of a
triumph^ was awarded to Duilius; and the story goes
that he was permitted to prolong this triumph throughout
his whole life by causing himself to be accompanied by a
flute-player and a torch-bearer whenever he returned
home of an evening from a banquet.' A column, deco-
rated with the beaks of conquered ships and with an in-
scription celebrating the victory,* was erected on the
Forum as a memorial of the battle.
J«lie^o^ This decisive victory of the Eomans happened just in
time to restore the fortune of war, which had seriously
gone against them in Sicily. Most of the towns on the
coast and many in the interior had fallen, as we have
seen, during the preceding year, into the hands of the
enemy. The Carthaginians were now besieging Segesta,
to revenge themselves for the treachery of the Segestans,
who had murdered the Carthaginian garrison and given
the town over to the Romans.^ During the consul's
absence from the army the military tribune C. CsBciUus
had attempted to assist the town, but was surprised and
suffered much loss.^ The greater part of the Eoman army
in Sicily lay in Segesta. It was, therefore, very fortunate
that Duilius was able, after his victory at Mylse, to take
* lAyjt epit. 17. This was the first triumphus navalis.
' Cicero, De Senectute, 13. Valerius Jdozimus, iii. 6, 4.
* The fragments of this inscription which are still extant appear to he parts
of the column restored hy Tiberius, and not of the original monument. See
Flatner and Urlich's Som, p. 234.
* See above, p. 44.
' Zonaras, viii. 11. Of this defeat no mention is made by Poly bins, i. 14.
THE FERST PUNIC WAR. 59
the soldiers from the ships and relieve this town. With CHAP.
Ill
the army thns set free, he was able to conqner some ^.^ — ^ —
towns, as for instance Macella, and to put other friendly p^^
cities in a state of defence. 261-266
Since the fall of Agrigentnm, the command of the ^^
Carthaginian troops in Sicily had been in the hands of Operations
Hamilcar — not the celebrated Hamilcar the father of car,
Hannibal,^ but a man not unlike his namesake in enter-
prising spirit and ability. It was probably owing to him
that during these years the Carthaginians did not lose
Sicily. He succeeded in so far counteracting the effect
of the Boman victories at Agrigentum and Mylse as to
make it doubtftil to which side the fortune of war waa
turning. These exploits of Hamilcar cannot be given in
detail, as the report of Philinus, who wrote the history of
the war from the Carthaginian point of view, has been lost,*
and as the order of time in which the events succeeded
each other is also doubtftd.' Still, the grand form of
Hamilcar stands out in such bold relief that we recognise
in him one of the greatest generals of that period. In
the outset he sacrificed a part of his mutinous mercenaries
after the manner which we have already seen applied by
Dionysius and Hiero. He sent them to attack the town
of Entella, afber having first warned the Eoman garrison
of their approach, and thus attained a double advantage,
inasmuch as he got rid of the inconvenient mercenaries,
and, as despair made them fight bravely, he inflicted con-
siderable injury on the Bomans. This faithless proceeding,
which, as we have seen, was by no means unheard of or
exceptional, shows how dangerous for both sides was the
relation between mercenaries and their commanders. On
the one side, instead of patriotism, faithftilness, and devo-
tion, we find among the soldiers a spirit of rapacity,
> Zonaras (viii. 10) erroneously supposes him to be the father of the great
Hannibal.
' We derive our infonnation chiefly from the confused fragments of Diodorus
(xxiii. fr. 9). Polybius passes over a good deal in silence, either for the
sake of brevity, or from partiality for the Romans.
* Diodorus {loo. cit.) seems to refer everything to the year after the conquest
of Agrigentum, -which is certainly a mistake.
60
ROMAN mSTORY.
BOOK
IV.
Destruc-
tion of
Eryx by
Hamilcar.
Victory of
Hamilcar
at Thermae.
hardly restrained by military discipline ; on the other we
observe cold calculation and heartlessness, which saw in a
soldier no kinsman, citizen, or brother, but an instrument
of war purchasable for a certain sum, and worthy of no
considerations bub those which called for the preservation
of valuable property.
With quite as much harshness, though with less cruelty,
Hamilcar treated the inhabitants of the old town of
Eryx. This town of the Elymi, at first friendly to the
Punians and then subject to them, appears to have been
exposed to the attacks of the Romans because it was not
situated immediately on the coast. Hamilcar razed it to
the ground, and sent the inhabitants away to the neigh-
bouring promontory, Drepana, where he built a new
fortified town, which, with the neighbouring town of
Lilybseum, formed as it were a common system of defence,
and subsequently proved its strength by a long-continued
resistance to the persevering attacks of the Bomans. Of
the venerable town of Eryx there remained only the
temple of Yenus, the building of which was attributed to
^neas, the son of the goddess.
After Hamilcar had thus covered his retreat, he proceeded
to the attack. We have already heard of the siege of
Begesta. The victory of the Romans at Mylse saved
Segesta, after it had been driven to the utmost distress.
But in the neighbourhood of Thermse,^ Hamilcar succeeded
in inflicting a great blow. He surprised a portion of the
Roman army, and killed 4,000 men.* The consequences
of the victory at My lee appear to have been confined to
the raising of the siege of Segesta. The Romans did not
succeed in taking the little fortress of Myttiatratum (now
* ThprmsB was a town built by the Carthaginians near the site of the ancient
city of Himera, which they had destroyed (Diodonis, xiii. 69 ff. 79).
« According to Diodorus, (xxiii. fr. 9), 6,000 men. Polybius (i. 24, §§ 3, 4)
excuses and extenuates the defeat of the Homans. He says that the allies
suffered the loss, not the Roman legions ; for a dispute had broken out between
these two classes of troops concerning the place of honour, and the allies had
taken up a separate position, where they were surprised and cut to pieces by
the Carthaginians.
1
THE FIBST PUNIC WAR. 61
called Mistrella) on the northern coa^t of Sicily. In spite
of the greatest possible exertions, they had to retreat, at
the end of a seven months' siege, with heavy losses.^ Pe^od
They lost, further, a number of Sicilian towns, the greater 261-256
part of which, it appears, went over voluntarily to the ^'^'
Carthaginians. Among these is mentioned the important
town of Camarina in the immediate neighbourhood of
Syracuse, and even Enna, in the middle of the island, the
town sacred to Ceres and Proserpina (Demeter and
Persephone) the protecting goddesses of Sicily. The hill
Camicus, where the citadel of Agrigentum stood, fell also
again into the power of the Carthaginians, who would
indeed, according to the report of Zonaras, have again
subdued the whole of Sicily if the consul of 259, C. Aquillius
Florus, had not wintered in the island, instead of returning
to Bome with his legions, according to the usual custom
after the end of the summer campaign.
In the following year fortune began once more to smile Renewed
on the Eomans. Both consuls, A. Atilius Calatinus and ^f ^^e^®^
C. Sulpicius Paterculus, went to Sicily. They succeeded Romang.
in retaking the most important of the places which had
revolted, especially Camarina * and Enna, together with
Myttistratum,' which had just been so obstinately defended.
* Poljbius (i. 24, § 11) mentions only the final conquest of Myttistratum
two years later, after it had, as he says, stood a protracted siege. Diodorus
alone (zxiii. fr. 9) states that a prmous siege ended with the retreat of the
Romans from the place. Polybiua betrays here as elsewhere a partiality for
the Romans, which is no doubt due, at least in part, to the authorities whom he
consulted.
* At the siege of Camarina the Roman army ran great risk of being annihi-
lated or captured. It was saTed by the self-devotion of a militazy tribune and
400 mfin (Livy, epit. 17 ; Zonaras, viii. 12; Gellius, iii. 7). Cato, who, in his
historical work Origines, compares the exploit of this tribune to that of
Tjeonidas at Thermopylae, laments that the Roman hero earned but scanty
praise, while the deed of Leonidas was celebrated all over Greece by historians,
poets, sculptors, and the whole nation. The brave tribune has indeed been
hardly treated, for we do not even know his name. Whilst Cato calls him Q.
Csedicius, the annalist Claudius Quadrigarius calls him Laberius, and Livy
Marcus Calpumius. Camarina resisted all the attacks of the Romans until at
length Hiero supplied his allies with engines for the siege (Diodorus, he, cit).
It is noteworthy that Polybius says nothing of all this.
" Polybius, i. 24, §§ 9-12. Littana (Diodorus, zxiii. f^. 9.) — ^probably identical
62 ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK At the conquest of this town, which had cost them so much,
^ — r-I — ' the resentment among the Boman soldiers was such thnt,
after the secret retreat of the Carthaginian garrison, they
fell on the helpless inhabitants, and murdered them without
mercy, until the consul put an end to their ferocity by
promising them, as part of their spoil, all the men whose
lives they would spare. The inhabitants of Camarina
were sold as slaves. We do not read that this was the
fate of Enna ; but this town could not expect an easier lot,
unless it redeemed its former treason by now betraying
the Carthaginian garrison into the hands of the Romans.
From these scanty details we can form some idea of the
indescribable misery which this bloody war brought upon
Sicily.
Erpedition The succcsscs of Hamilcar in Sicily, in the year 259,
ComImI.^ ^ ■'^ere, it appears, to be attributed in part to the circumstance
that the Romans after the battle of MylsB had sent
L. Cornelius Scipio, one of the consuls of the year 269, to
Corsica, in the hope of driving the Carthaginians quite out
of the Tyrrhenian sea. On this island the Carthaginians
had, as £bt as we know, no settlements or possessions. Still
they must have had in the town of Aleria a station for their
fleet, whence they could constantly alarm and threaten
Italy. Aleria fell into the hands of the Bomans, and thus
the whole island was cleared of the Carthaginians. From
thence Scipio sailed to Sardinia ; but here nothing was
done. Both Carthaginians and Bomans avoided an en-
counter, and Scipio returned home.* This expedition to
Corsica and Sardinia, which Polybius, probably on account
of its insignificance and its fiiilure, does not even mention,
was for the Cornelian house a sufficient occasion to celebrate
Scipio as a conqueror and hero. They were justified in
with Hippana, mentioned by Polybius, (i. 24, § 10) — was likewise taken, as
also the hill Camicns near Agrigentum, and the town of Erbessns. An attempt
of the consul Atilius to seize the island of Lipara failed. How little the
later compilers of historical compendiaries are to be trusted mAy be seen from
the statements of Aurelius Victor (39) and Florus (ii. 2), that Drepana and
Lilybsum were taken by the Romans.
' Zonaras, Tiii. 1 1.
B.a
THE HBST PUNIC WAR 63
saying that lie took Aleria ; and as the expulsion of the CHAP.
Carthaginians from C!orsica followed, he might be regarded ^ r^ — ^
as the conqueror of Corsica, though in truth Corsica was p^^od
not occupied by the Eomans till after the peace with .261-256
Carthage. Accordingly these exploits are noticed on the
second grave-stone in the series of monuments belonging
to the family of the Scipios, with the first of which we have
already become acquainted.^ From this modesty, which con-
fined itself to the real facts, we cannot help inferring that
the inscription was composed shortly after the death of
Scipio, when the memory of his deeds was fresh, and a great
exaggeration could hardly be ventured upon. If it had
not been so, and if the inscription had had a later origin,
there is nothing more certain than that in this, as in that
of the father, great untruths would have been introduced.
This becomes quite evident from the additions which we
find in later authors, and which can have originated only
in the family traditions of the Scipios. Valerius Maximus,
Orosius, and Silius Italicus^ mention a second campaign of
Scipio in Sardinia, in which he besieged and conquered
Olbia, defeated Hanno, the Carthaginian general, and
displayed his magnanimity by causing his body to be in-
terred with all honours.^ He then gained possession with-
out difficulty of a number of hostile towns by a peculiar
stratagem, and finally, as the Capitoline £etsti testify,
' See Tol. i. p. 469. The following is the epitaph (Orelli, Inteript Latin*
Selfcl. n. 662) :—
Hone oino ploirume consentiont B(oiaae}
Duonoro optumo ftiise Tiro
Luciom Scipione. Filios Barbati
CoDSol censor aidilis hie fuet a(pnd tos)
Hec cepit Corsica Aleriamqtie iirbe
Dedet tempestatibns aide merito.
Compare Bitschl, Rheinisches Mumim^ 1864.
' Valerius Maxinms, t. 1, 2. Orosius, iy. T, Silius Italicas, vi. 671.
* Traits of generosity and a chivalrous disposition seldom met with among ths
Eomans we shall frequently find in the histoiy of the Scipios. They are quite
characteristic of this particular family, and their insertion into the history of
Borne seems to be owing to a writer of poetic imagination. Perhaps we can
here trace the band of the poet Ennius, who was a client of the Scipios.
64
ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK
IV.
Battle of
Tyndaris.
celebrated a magnificent triumph.' These additions, of
which neither the epitaph of Scipio, nor Zonaras, nor
Poljbius know anything, are nothing more than empty
inventions. Moreover, we see from Polybius and Zonaras,
that, in the year before Scipio's consulate, Hannibal, not
Hamno, had the command in Sardinia. When the former,
in the year following (268), had been blocked up in a
harbour in Sardinia by the consul Sulpicius, and, after
losing many of his ships, had been murdered by his own
mutinous soldiers, Eanno received the command of the
Carthaginians in Sardinia, and could not therefore have
been conquered, slain, and buried by Scipio the year
before.^
The year 268 had restored the superiority of the Somans
in Sicily. They had conquered Camarina, Enna, Myttis-
tratum, and many other towns, and driven back Hamilcar
to the west side of the island. The expeditions which
they had undeirtaken against Corsica and Sardinia had
also been on the whole successful. The power of Carthage
in the Tyrrhenian sea was weakened, and Italy for the
present secure against any hostile fleet. To these suc-
cesses was added in the following year a glorious battle
by sea (267 B.C.) at Tyndaris, on the northern coast of
Sicily. It was no decisive victory, for both parties
claimed an advantage. Still it inspired the Bomans with
new confidence in their navy. It induced them to enlarge
their fleet, and to prosecute the naval war on a larger scale.
It prompted the bold idea of removing the seat of war into
the enemy's country, and of attacking Africa instead of
protecting Italy against the Carthaginian invasions.
Whether their hopes went further, whether they had
1 We have often had occasion to notice the worthlessneas of the Capitoline
fasti as historical documents. Circnmstantial lies engrayed on marble slabs are
very imposing; nevertheless the following document must be rejected as entirely
fictitious :
Cornelius L. f. On. n. Scipio Cos. An. cdxcit.
De Foenis et Sardinia Corsica V. id. Mart,
* PolybiuSi i. 24, § 6. Zonaras, riii. 12. Livy, epit 17.
THE HEST PUNIC WAR. 65
already conceived the scheme which Scipio succeeded in CHAP,
carrying ont at the end of the second war with Carthage, >>. ,J — .
viz. that of aiming a deadly blow at the very centre of 1^^^
Carthaginian power, and so bringing the struggle to a 261-266
B C
conclusion, would be difficult to prove. In that case they
would have estimated the strength of Carthage much too
low, and their own powers too high ?
Efforts were now made in Bome to fit out an armament. Movements
A fleet of 330 ships of war sailed to Sicily, took on board ^nder
an army of about 40,000 men, consisting of two consular Reeulus
armies, and sailed along the south coast of Sicily west- Manlius
wards, under the command of the two consuls, M. Atilius ^'^^^°*
Regulus and L. Manlius Vulso. Between the promontory
of Ecnomus and the town of Heraclea the Bomans met a
Carthaginian fleet still stronger than their ovm, under the
command of Hamilcar and Hanno, whose object was to
obstruct their way to Africa. If we may rely on the
accounts of Polybius, there was here an army of 140,000
Bomans, opposed to 150,000 Carthaginians. But it is
hardly credible that the Carthaginian ships should have
had an army on board equal to that of the Bomans, as the
latter intended a descent on Africa, and had their whole
land force, i.e, four double legions, with them. The
Carthaginians would have had no object in encumber-
ing their ships to that extent, especially as their tactics
did not consist so much in boarding as in disabling
iheir enemies' ships, and as they endeavoured in every
way to avoid the Boman boarding-ladders. We have no
Carthaginian authority to test the report of Boman
witnesses that the fleet of Hamilcar consisted of 350
ships. There is, then, no choice left but to follow Polybius,
who has described the battle at Ecnomus with such clear-
ness and accuracy of detail that nothing more can be
desired.^
The Carthaginian fleet advanced from the west in a Battle of
single long extended front, which stretched from the coast Ecnomus.
> Poljbiofi,!. 26-28.
VOL. II. F
66 BOMAN HISTORY.
BOOK far oat into the sea, and only on the left wing fonned an
IV.
, angle, by one detachment being placed rather in advance.
The Boman fleet, consisting of four divisions, formed with
three of them a hollow triangle, the point of which, headed
by the consuls in person, was directed against the
Carthaginian line. The quinqueremes, which formed the
base of the triangle, had the ships of burden in tow, while
the fourth division formed the rear in one line of war-
ships, which carried the veteran troops, the triarians of
the legions. If this wedge-like form of the Eoman fleet
was suited to breaking through the Carthaginian line, the
long line of the latter was on the other hand calculated to
surround the Romans. This disposition determined the
issue of the battle. The consuls broke through the
line of Carthaginian vessels without trouble. By their
advance the two lines of Boman ships which formed the
sides of the triangle were separated from the base. Against
this remainder were now directed the attacks of both the
Carthaginian wings. The great naval battle resolved
itself into three distinct parts, each of which was sufficiently
important to rank as a battle by itself. The Eoman ships
with the transports were hard pressed and obliged to slip
their cables, to sacrifice the transports, and to retreat. The
reserve, with the triarians, was in the same distress. At
length, when the consuls, giving up the pursuit of the
Carthaginian centre, came to the assistance of their
own main body, the victory turned to the side of the
Bomans. The boarding-ladders seem again to have
rendered important service. Thirty Carthaginian ships
were destroyed, sixty-four were taken. The loss of the
Bomans was at the outside twenty-four ships.
lAnding of After such a decided victory the way to Carthage was
Komans on opcu to the Bomans. But to our astonishment we read
Cartha<?i- ^^ ^j^^y returned to Messana for the purpose of takiner in
man teen- •' , , x- x- &
tLty. supplies, and repairmg their damaged vessels.^ From this
■ Zonaias, Tiii. 12. There is also a report of negotiations of peace, by which
Hamilcar wished to gain time. On this occasion a silly story is related, which
exhibits the barefiiced mendacity and childish vanity of the later collectors of
THE FIBST PUNIC WAR. 67
we may conclude that the losses of the Romans were also chap.
considerable, and must haye Mien heavily especially on ^- , ' ,..
the transport ships, which carried the provisions, a cir- p^^^^
cnmstance of which oar narrator makes no mention. 261-256
After a short time the fleet again set sail, and without any ^^'
opposition reached the African coast near the Hermsean
promontory (Cape Bon) east of Carthage. The Bomans
then sailed eastwards along the coast as far as Clypea,
which they took and fortified.
From this point they made expeditions into the most Ravages of
fertile part of the Carthaginian dominions, which in the ^ytn "*
fifty yeat^ since the devastating invasion of Agathokles Africa,
had recovered themselves, and presented to the eyes of the
Italians a picture of unimagined riches and luxurious fer-
tility.^ The industry and skill of the inhabitants had
converted the whole of those districts into a garden.
anecdotes. When Hanno, we are told, appeared as negotiator in the Roman
camp, the consuls vere advised to seize him, in retaliation for the treacherons
imprisonment of Scipio off the island of Lipara (pee ahove, p. 55). Hanno was
in imminent danger, but saved himself by the remark that ' if the Romans
acted in this manner, they would be as bad as the Carthaginians.' The consuls
thereupon felt too proud to retain as a prisoner a hostile general who had come
on a message of peace, trusting to the protection of the law of nations. It
seems strange that any Roman writer could (like Valerius Mazimus, vi. 6, 2)
find in this ptoceeding an occasion for glorifying Roman integrity and honour,
even if it were true that Cornelius Scipio was treacherously seized by the Car-
thaginians five years before. But it is too bad to make a Carthaginian general
flatter the Roman people at the cost of his *own and his country's abasement.
Of such indirect self-laudation of the Romans we have frequent instances.
We have noticed it on the occasion of the war with Fyrrhus (vol i. pp. 496, 524).
Polybius says nothing of the whole incident.
> This fertility indireetly contradicts the absurd stoty of the monstrous serpent
which (ac appears from Livy, epit 18, and Valerius Maximus, i. 8, 19) occupied
a prominent place in the later narratives of the war, but which is not referred
to by PolybiuB. Near the river Bagradas, it is said, the Roman army encoun-
tered a gigantic serpent, which devoured the soldiers that approached incau-
tiously and which kept the whole army at a distance from the river. No missile
could pierce its skin. A detachment was sent against it, and it was at last
crushed by huge stones which were dischaiged by ballistse. Its putrefying body
infected the air, and forced the Romans to leave the neighbourhood. We have
a meamire of the credulity and the credibility of Roman historians in their
references to alleged evidence in the assurance that the skin of this serpent,
measuring one hundred and twenty feet in length, was brought to Rome and
exhibited there down to the time of the Numantine war, t.e. 133 b.c. (Pliny,
Hist. Nat. viu. H).
f2
68 KOMAN HISTORY.
BOOK Agriculture flourished among the Carthaginians in the
/ ,/ highest degree ; more especiallj theyunderstood how to ren-
der that rich but hot and dry soil productive, by conduct-
ing over it, in innumerable canals, an ample supply of water,
the most needful of all requisites. The country, which still
in the time of the emperors was the granary of the Eomans,
was under the Carthaginians in the most flourishing state.
It was covered with numberless villages and open towns,
and with the magnificent country residences of the Punic
nobility. Carthage, as mistress of the sea, feared no hos-
tile invasions, and most of the towns were unfortified. Ko
chain of fortresses, like those of the Boman colonies on the
coast or in the interior of the country, offered places of
refuge to the distressed inhabitants, or contained a popu-
lation able and ready to fight, like the Eoman colonists,
who could oppose the predatory marches of the enemy.
The horror and distress therefore of the African population
were great when, all of a sudden, 40,000 rapacious foes
overran their country, exercising the fearful rights of war
which delivered into the hands of the conquerors the life,
possessions, and freedom of every inhabitant. The Cartha-
ginians had in the course of the war disturbed the coast of
Italy, burnt houses, destroyed harvests, cut down fruit-
trees, carried away spoil and prisoners. They now suffered
in Africa an ample retribution, and the Boman soldier
indemnified himself thoroughly for the dangers he had
undergone, and the terrors with which his imagination
had filled the unknown bounds of the African continent.
We read of 20,000 men torn from their homes and sold as
slaves. The spoils were all sent to the fortress of Clypea.
Thither some time afterwards orders were sent from Borne
that one of the two consuls with his army and with most
of the ships and spoils should return to Italy, while the
other consul with two legions and forty ships should i^main
in Africa to carry on the war. This resolution of the
Boman senate would be unintelligible if the expedition to
Africa had been intended to answer any purpose other than
that of a vigorous diversion. It could not have been sup-
THE FIRST PUNIC WAE. 69
posed in Borne that two legions, which were not sufficient CHAP,
in Sicily to keep the Carthaginians in check, could carry ^. ^ __^
on the war effectually in Africa and overthrow the power Sbcond
of the Carthaginians in their own country. If Begulus 261-255
had confined himself to enterprises on a small scale, the "'^*
success would haye been adequate to the sacrifice. But
elated, ifc seems, by his unexpected good fortune, he raised
his hopes higher and aspired to the glory of terminating
the war by a signal victory.*
The battle at Ecnomus and the landing of the hostile Exorbitant
army on their coast had entirely disconcerted the Cartha- Reguius^as
ginians. At first they were afiraid of an attack on their conditions
capital, and a portion of the fleet 'had sailed back from
Sicily to protect it. There were clearly no great forces in
Africa, as a hostile invasion was not apprehended. Now
the Romans had effected a landing, thanks to their victory
at Ecnomus ; and the Carthaginians were not in a position
to defend the open country against them* In their
anxiety for the safety of the capital they at first concen-
trated their troops near it ; and in this fact we find an
explanation of the great successes of Begulus. He was
enabled not only to march through the length and breadth
of the country without danger, but to maintain his advan-
tage when the Carthaginians ventured to attack him*
He is said to have won a decided victory because the
Carthaginians, out of fear, would not venture on the level
ground, but kept on the heights, where their elephants
and horse, their most powerful arms, were almost useless.
Mention is also made of a revolt of Numidian allies or
subjects, which caused to the Carthaginians a greater loss
than that of signal defeat. They were therefore disposed
to peace, and tried to negotiate vrith Begulus, who on his
side wished to end the war before he was superseded in
the command by a successor. But the conditions which
he offered were such as could be accepted only after a
complete overthrow. He insisted that they should resign
» PolybiuB, i. 31, § 4.
70
BOMAN HISTORY.
BOOK
IV.
Defeat of
BeguluB.
Sicily, pay a contribution of war, restore the prisoners and
deserters, deliver up the fleet and content themselves
with a single ship, and, finally, make their foreign policy
dependent on the pleasure of Borne.
The negotiations were therefore broken off, and the war
was carried on with redoubled energy.
In the meantime the year of the consulship of Begulus
had expired. He remained, however, as proconsul in Africa,
and his army seems to have been strengthened by Numi-
dians and other Africans.' The Carthaginians also increased
their forces. Among the Greek mercenaries whom they now
got together was a Spartan officer of the name of Xanthip-
pus, of whose antecedents we know nothing, but who, if all
that is related of his exploits in the African war be true,
must have been a man of great military ability. It is
said that he directed the attention of the Carthaginians to
the fact that their generals were worsted in the war with
Begulus because they did not understand how to select a
proper ground for their elephants and their powerful
cavalry,* By his advice, it is said, the Carthaginians now
lefb the hills and challenged the Bomans to fight on the
level ground. Begulus, with too much boldness, had
' This is evident from the circumstance that in the next battle, so fatal to
the Roman arms, Regulus had a force of 30,000 (according to Appian,
viii. 3) or 32,000 men (according to Eutropius, ii. 21, and Orosius, iv. 9).
'It seems rery strange, as Mommsen justly remarks {Ram. Gesch, i. 529,
Anm. ; English translation, ii. 44), that the Carthaginian generals should hare
had to learn this from a stranger. Is it possible that the jealousy of the Roman
historians grudged the Carthaginians the credit of having gained the victory
by their o'wn ingenuity and strength ? Perhaps the chief merit of Xanthippus
consisted in the proper use of the elephants. The employment of these animals
in war originated in Asia, and had passed into the tactics of the Greeks by the
successors of Alexander the Great. From them the Carthaginians had learnt
it, either in their war with Pyrrhus, or even before, from Greek mercenaries.
But they appear not to have been thorough masters of this new engine of war.
In the battle of Agrigentum the elephants had been of no use and had even
contributed to the deft'at of the Carthaginians (see above, p. 47). But at
Tunes, where Begulus was routed, they decided the victory. If, as is most
likely, Xanthippus was an officer from the school of Alexander the Great, it
was perhaps due to him that the elephants were this time handled properly.
This conjecture receives an indirect confirmation by the issue of the battle of
Panormus (see below, p. 77)> where the Carthaginian army was defeated chiefly
owing to the unskilfulness of Hasdrubal in the use of the elephants.
THE FIEST PUNIC WAR. 71
advanced from Clypea, the basis of bis operations, and bad CHAP.
lU.
penetrated into the neigbbourbood of Cartbage, wbere be .
bad taken possession of Tunes. Here be could not pos- f?^^^"*
siblj maintain bimself. He was obliged to accept a battle 261-255
on tbe plain, and suffered a signal defeat, wbicb, owing to ^'^'
tbe great superiority of tbe Cartbaginian cavalry, ended
in tbe almost complete annihilation of tbe Bomans. Only
about 2,000 escaped witb difficulty to Clypea; 500 were
taken prisoners, and among tbese Begulus bimself. Tbe
Eoman expedition to Africa, so boldly undertaken and at
first so gloriously carried out, met witb a more miserable
fate tban tbat of Agatbokles, and seemed indisputably to
confirm tbe opinion tbat tbe Cartbaginians were invincible
in their own conntry.'
It was necessary now, if possible, to save tbe remainder Victory of
of tbe Eoman army, and to bring tbem uninjured back to it^nrnns at
Italy. A still larger Eoman fleet tban tbat wbicb bad theHer-
msean pro-
conquered at Ecnomus was accordingly sent to Africa, and montoiy.
obtained over tbe Cartbaginians at tbe Hermsean promon-
tory a victory wbicb, judging by tbe number of Cartba-
ginian vessels taken, must bave been more brilliant tban
tbe last.' If tbe Eomans bad intended to continue tbe
' We cannot credit the reports according to which, the Carthaginians treated
Xanthippns with ingratitude and caused him to be murdered on his return to
his own country, in order to expunge the humiliating memory of their great ob-
ligations to him (Valerius MaximuR, ix. 6, 1; Zonaras, viii. 13; Appian, viii. 4).
Polybius had heard of these or similar charges, but he rejected them, and related
(i. 36, § 2) that Xanthippus left Carthage shortly after his victory, from the fear
of exposing himself to jealousy and calumny.
' According to Polybius (i. 86, §11) not less than 114 Carthaginian vessels
were taken with their crews. But the statements concerning this victory are
veiy conflicting. Instead of 114 captured vessels, Diodorus (xxiii, fr. 14)
mentions only 24, not to speak of the numbers given by Eutropius and Orosius.
Haltaus {Gesch. der Bomer, i. 308, Anm.) proposes to change the number kKorhv
9€KaT4cffapa$ of Polybius into f£ico<n koL r4fftrapa%f and thus to make the statements
of Polybius and Diodorus agree with one another. This ingenious conjecture is
highly commendable. If we adopt it, we shall no longer see anything strange
in the narrative of Polybius, who tells us that the Romans drove back the Car-
thaginians with ease and at the first onset (^| k^i6Jiov koX ^f8(»s rpcifM^^cyoi), an
expression which would hardly be appropriate, if 114 vessels had been
taken. Such a number of captured vessels would make the victory near the
Hermsran promontory a more brilliant one than that of Ecnomus ; and it would,
72 ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK war in Africa till they had utterly overthrown Carthage,
-_ / - they would have been able now to carry their plan into
execution, though not under such favourable circumstances
as before the defeat of Begulus. The fact, however, that
they did not do this, and that they sent no new army to
Africa,* strengthens the inference suggested by the with-
drawal of half of the invading army after the landing
of Begulus, viz., that the expedition to Africa was under-
taken only for the sake of plundering and injuring the
land, and for dividing the Carthaginian forces. The only
use made of the victory at the Hermeean promontory was to
take into their ships the remnant of the legions of Segidus
and the spoils which had been collected in Clypea.
Destnic- The Soman fleet sailed back to Sicily heavily laden.
Roman But now, after so much well-merited success, a misfortune
fleet off the overtook them on the southern coast of Sicily frx)m which
Sicily. no bravery could protect them. A fearfril hurricane
destroyed the greater number of the ships, and strewed
the entire shore, from Camarina to the promontory
Pachynus, with wrecks and corpses. Only eighty vessels
escaped destruction, a miserable remnant of the fleet which,
after twice conquering the Carthaginians, seemed able
fr*om this time forward to exercise undisputed dominion
over the sea.
to Bay the leAst, be surprising that Polybins should dispose of it in three lines,
whilst he devotes as many chapters to the battle of £cnomu8. Zonaras (riii.
14), in his description of the battle near the Hermnan promontory, differs
widely from Folybius. Dion Cassius, whom Zonaras abridged, had evidently
drawn his information from another source, possibly from Philtnus. Accord*
ing to this account tlie battle was long doubtful, and was at last decided in
favour of the Romans when those Roman vessels which had wintered in Clypea
advanced and attcuiked the Carthaginians in the rear. This is another instance
which shows that the detail of descriptions of battles deserves as yet little
credit.
* Polybius says nothing of a landing of Roman troops in Clypea, and of &
battle with the Carthaginians, reported by Zonaras (viii. 14), in which (accord-
ing to Orosius, iv. 9) 9,000 of them were killed. This alleged victory was
probably gained only on paper by some patriotic Roman annalist, as a set-off
against the defeat of Regulus.
THE FIKST PUNIC WAR. 78
Third Period, 254-250.
THE VICTOET AT PANOEMUS.
It was among sach reverses as these tliat Borne showed
her greatness. In three months a new fleet of 220 ships
joined the remnant of the disabled fleet in Messana, and Third
sailed towards the western part of the island^ to attack the 264-260
fortresses of the Carthaginians, who, little expecting such ^'^'
a result, were fully enga&red in Africa in subduing: and Capture of
' •' ° ° ° PaDormus
punishing their revolted subjects. Thus it happened that by Cn.
the Bomans made a signal and important conquest. Next to g^^i^ ^^
LilybsBum and Drepana, Panormus was the most consider-
able Carthaginian stronghold in Sicily. Its situation on the
north coast, in connexion with the Punic stations on the
LiparsBan Islands, made it easy for an enemy to attack and
ravage the Italian coast. The place, which, under Punic
dominion, had reached a high state of prosperity, consisted
in a strongly fortified old town and a suburb or new town,
which had its own walls and towers. This new town was now
attacked by the Bomans with great force both by land and
sea, and after a vigorous resistance it fell into their hands.
The defenders took refuge in the old town, which was more
strongly fortified ; and here, after a long blockade, they
were forced by hunger to surrender. They were allowed
to buy themselves off each for two minse. By this means
10,000 of the inhabitants obtained their freedom. The
remainder, 13,000 in number, who had not the means to
pay the sum required, were sold as slaves.* This brilliant
success was gained by Cn. Cornelius Scipio, who six years
before had been taken prisoner in Lipara, and had since
then gained his freedom either by ransom or exchange.
The undisturbed blockade of the important town of Failure of
Panormus, in the neighbourhood of Drepana and Lilybeeum, ^® second
' The mnsom must have been paid either by the Carthaginian state, or by
fHends or relatires of the captives, not living in Panormas, for according to
the laws of war all the money and valuables contained in Panormus fell into
the hands of the Romans.
74 ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK shows that at that time the Carthaginians had not a suf-
— / ,^ ficient army in Sicily, as otherwise they would certainly
Roman ex- have tried to deliver Panormus.' They were folly engaged
pwiition to i^ Africa. The Eomans accordingly ventured in the same
year to attack Drepana, and though their enterprise
failed, they attempted in the following year to take even
Lilybseum, and then made a second expedition into Africa,
most probably in order to take advantage of the difficulties
of the Carthaginians in their own country. This under-
taking, which, like the former invasion, was intended to be
only a raid on a large scale, utterly failed, producing
not even the glory which crowned the first acts of Regu-
lus. The great Roman fleet, with two consular armies
on board, sailed towards the same coast on which Regu-
lus had landed, east of the Hermsean promontory, where
lay the most flourishing part of the Carthaginian territory.
The Romans succeeded in landing in different places, and
collecting spoil ; but nowhere, as formerly in Clypea, could
they obtain a firm footing. At last the ships were cast on the
sand banks in the shallow waters of the lesser Syrtis (Gulf of
Cabes), and could only be got afloat again with the greatest
trouble, on the return of the tide, and after every thing had
been thrown overboard that could be dispensed with. The
return voyage resembled a flight, and near the Palinurian
promontory on the coast of Lucania (west of Policastro)
the ships were overtaken by a terrible storm, in which a hun-
dred and fifty of them were lost. The repetition of such
a dreadful misfortune in so short a time, the loss of two
magnificent fleets within three years, quite disgusted the
Romans with the sea. They resolved to relinquish for the
future all naval expeditions, and, devoting all their energies
to their land army, to keep equipped only as many ships as
might be needed to supply the army in Sicily with pro-
' It IB Stated that in this year the Carthaginians retook Agrigentum, and
that they would hare reconquered the whole of Sicily if they had not been
informed of the arrival of both consuls (Zonaras, viii. 14). The latter asser-
tion is an unmeaning phrase, and as to Agrigentum, it is hardly probable that
after its repeated captures that town can have been a place of much impor-
tance or militaiy strength.
THE FIBST PUNIC WAR. 75
visions, and to afford all necessary protection to the coast CHAP.
of Italy. We may fairly feel surprised at finding in the w J- ^
Capitoline fasti the record of a victory of the consul C. ^"^
Sempronius Bleesus over the Punians.' If such a triumph 264-250
really was celebrated after such an utter failure, it would
follow that under certain circumstances the honour was
easily obtained.
The two years of the war which now followed were years Exhaus-
of exhaustion and comparative rest on both sides. The ^^^
war, which had now lasted twelve years, had caused
innumerable losses, and still the end was far off. The
Bomans had, it is true, according to our reports, been
conquerors in almost every engagement, not only by land,
bnt, what was prized far higher and gave them far greater
satisfaction, by sea also. The defeat of Begulus was the
only reverse of any importance which their army by land
had experienced. In consequence of that reverse they had
to leave Africa ; but in Sicily they had gradually advanced
further westward. The towns which at the beginning of
the war had been only doubtful possessions, inclining first
to one side and then to the other, were all either in the
iron grip of the Bomans, or were destroyed and had lost
all importance as military stations. In the west the
limits of the territory where the Carthaginians were still
able to offer a vigorous resistance were more and more
contracted. From Agrigentum and Panormus they had
fallen back upon Lilybaeum and Drepana, and even towards
these the Eomans had already stretched out their hands.
Still more, Bome had contended for the mastery over the
sea with the greatest maritime power in the world, and
had been victorious in each of the three great naval
engagements. But they were not at home on that
element, and in the two tremendous storms of the years
255 and 2-33 they lost, with the fruits of their heroic
* That the Capitoline fasti are utterly unworthy of credit we have already seen
(i. 280 €t geq. ; 528, note 2). In the present instance the alleged triumph of C.
Sempronius Ti. f. Ti. n. Blsesns Cos de Poenis is no doubt a forgery, imported
into the public annals through the mendacity of the Sempronian family.
76 ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK perseverance, even their confidence and their courage.
The greatest burden of the war fell on the unfortunate
island of Sicily, but Italy suffered also by her sacrifices of
men and materials of war, by the predatory incursions of
the enemy, and by the interruption of her trade. It may
therefore easily be explained how both belligerents were
satisfied to pause awhile from any greater enterprise, and
thus gain time to recover their strength.
U^hj ^^^ *^® ^^ ^^^ ^^* ^^^® entirely. In the year 252 the
tho Ro- Romans succeeded in taking Lipara, with the aid of a fleet
™*°*' which their faithful ally Hiero, of Syracuse, sent to their
assistance,^ and Thermae (or Himera), the only place on
the north coast of Sicily which was left to the Carthagi-
nians after the loss of Panormus. That the Carthaginians
should quietly allow this, without making any attempt to
ward off the attack, is very surprising. In the annals which
have come down to us, the history of the war is unfortu-
nately written so decidedly from a Boman point of view that
we know nothing at all of the internal affairs of the Car-
thaginians, and of what they were doing when not engaged
against the Romans. We may suppose they had still
enough to do in quelling the insurrection of their subjects,
and so were compelled to leave the Romans in Sicily to
act unopposed.
7h^. "^^ -^^ length, in the year 251, they sent a fleet of 200 ships
mans at under Hasdrubal, and a strong army of 30,000 men into
Sicily, with a detachment of 140 elephants.^ These
acimals, known to the Romans since the time of Fyrrhus,
had again become objects of fresh terror after the defeat of
Regulus, of which they had been the principal cause, and
the greatest timidity reigned in the army of the proconsul.*
Caecilius Metellus shut himself up in Panormus with only
a consular army, and evaded the engagement. In the
meantime Hasdrubal laid waste the open country and
drew near to the town, where, between the walls and the
* Zonaras, viii. 14. Diodonu, xziiL fr. 14. Trontin. Strateg. ir. 12.
« Orosiufl, iv. 9. ■ Polybiug, i. 39, § 11.
Panormus.
B.C.
THE FIEST PUNIC WAR 77
river Orethus,* lie had no room either for drawing np his CHAP.
TTT
forces — especially the elephants and the horse — or for re- v., / ,..
treating in case of a reverse. Confident of success, and in- ^^^
tent only on drawing the enemy out of the town and getting 264-260
them to accept a battle, he failed to take the common pre-
caution of covering himself with mounds and trenches.* On
the other side, Metellus, who could at any time retreat,
formed his column inside the gates, and sent a number of
light-armed troops to harass the Carthaginians and draw
them nearer to the town. When the elephants had driven
back the Boman skirmishers as far as the town trench, and
were now exposed to their missiles and unable to do any-
thing further, they fell into great disorder, became un-
manageable, turned round on the Carthaginian infantry,
and caused the utmost confusion. Metellus availed himself
of this moment to burst forth out of the town, and to attack
the enemy in flank. The mercenaries, unable to keep
their ground, rushed in wild flight towards the sea, where
they hoped to be taken in by the Carthaginian vessels,
but the greater part perished miserably. Metellus gained
a brilliant and decided victory. The charm was broken,
the Bomans were themselves again,' Fanormus was saved,
and the Carthaginians were compelled henceforth to give
up all thoughts of an aggressive war, and to confine them-
selves to the defence of the few fortresses which they still
possessed in Sicily. Having lost ThermsB in 252,* and
still earlier Solus or Soluntum, Kephalsedion and Tyndaris,
they now abandoned Selinus, transplanting the inhabitants
to Lilybseum. The incompetent Hasdrubal on his return
paid for his defeat the penalty of crucifixion. The cap-
tured elephants, the number of which, according to some
writers, was about 120,^ were led in triumph to Borne and
* This small river flowed into the sea not far from the town on the south
side. See Schubring, Topo^apkie von Panormus. Liibeck, 1870, p. 24.
« Diodoras, xxiii. fr. 14. ■ Polybius, i. 40, § 16.
* Polybius, i. 89, § 18 ; Diodoms, xziii. fr. 14 ; Zonaras, viii. 14.
* Liyy, epit. 19; Zonaras, viii. 14. The number varies, however, and is
given by different writers as 60, 100, 104, 120, and 142. According to
Polybius (i. 40, § 15), only ten were taken during the battle ; the rest fell into
the hands of the Homans when the battle was over. Their number is not
stated by Polybius.
78
KOMAN HISTORY.
BOOK
IV.
Alleged
mission of
Carthagi-
nian
envoys to
Rome.
The story
of Regu-
lus.
there hunted to death in the circus. Never had a Boman
general merited or celebrated a more splendid triumph
than Metellus,' who, with two legions, had defeated and
annihilated an army of double the strength of his own.'
The elephants on the coins of the Csecilian family pre-
served, until late times, the memory of this glorious victory.
The battle of Fanormus marks the turning-point in the
war, which had now lasted thirteen years. The courage
of the Carthaginians seemed at length to be quite broken.
They decided to enter into negotiations for peace, or to
propose at least an exchange of prisoners. The embassy
dispatched to Eome for this purpose has become famous
in history, especially because, as it is related, the cap-
tive Begulus was sent with it in order to support the
proposals of the Carthaginians with his influence. The
conduct of Begulus became the subject of poetical effu-
sions, the echo of which we find in Horace • and Silius
Italicus.^ Closely connected with this is the tradition of
the violent death of Begulus, which is so characteristic of
the Boman historians that we cannot pass it over in
silence.
Five years had passed since the unhappy battle in the
neighbourhood of Tunes, which consigned Begulus and 500
» Polyhius, i. 40. § 10.
* Metellus was alive many years after this yictory ; he was made once more
eonsnl, then master of the horse and dictator, and lastly pontifex maximns.
As such he sarf^d, from the burning temple of Testa, the sacred Palladium,
the statue of the tutelary deity of Rome, at the risk of his life, and with the
loss of his eyesight, and for this exploit he obtained leave to use a chariot
when he wished to attend the meetings of the senate. Fliny {Hist. Nat,
yii. 45) mentions the laudatory speech which the son of Metellus delivered at
the funeral of his father and committed to writing, and in which he said * that
he had accomplished the ten best and greatest things which wise men spend
their lives to obtain : that he had wished to be a first-rate warrior, a good
orator, a brave general ; that he wished to conduct the highest state affairs, to
enjoy the greatest honour, to possess great wisdom, to be esteemed the first
among the senators, to acquire great wealth honestly, to leave behind
many children, and to be the most distinguished man in the community.'
From this specimen we may form an opinion of the nature and quality of the
family documents which were the chief source from which the earliest Roman
annalists composed their so-called history of Rome.
' Horace, Od.^ iii. 5. * Silius Italicus, Punic, vi. 346-386.
B.C.
THE FIRST PUNIC WAR. 79
of his fellow-soldiers to captivity. Now when the Cartha- CHAP.
ginians decided, after their defeat at Panormus, to make an .„ ^ '
exchange of prisoners, and, if possible, to conclude peace y^^
with Borne, they sent Begulus with the embassy, for they 264-260
considered him a fit person to advocate their proposals.
But in this expectation they were signally disappointed.
Begulus gave his advice not only against the peace,
but also against the exchange of prisoners, because he
thought it would result only in the advantage of Carthage.
He resisted all the entreaties of his own family and friends,
who wished him to stay in Borne ; and when they urged
him, and the senate seemed disposed to make the ex-
change, he declared that he could no longer be of any
service to his country, and that, moreover, he was doomed
to an early death, the Carthaginians having given hini a
slow poison. He refused even to go into the town to see
his wife and children, and, time to his oath, returned to
Carthage, although he knew that a cruel punishment
awaited him. The Carthaginians, exasperated at this
disappointment of their hopes, invented the most horrible
tortures to kill him by slow degrees. They shut him up with
an elephant, to keep him in constant fear ; thoy prevented
his sleeping, caused him to feel the pangs of hunger, cut
off his eyelids and exposed him to the burning rays of the
sun, against which he was no longer able to close his eyes.
At last they shut him up in a box stuck all over with nails,
and thus killed him outright. When this became known
in Borne, the senate delivered up two noble Carthaginian
prisoners, Bostar and Hamilcar, to the vddow and the sons
of Begulus. These unhappy creatures were then shut up
in a narrow cage which pressed their limbs together, and
they were kept for many days without food. When
Bostar died of hunger, the cruel Bom an matron left the
putrefying corpse in the narrow cage by the side of his
surviving companion, whose life she prolonged by spare
and meagre diet in order to lengthen out his sufferings.
At last this horrible treatment became known,' and the
* This treatment was the more atrocious as the captive Hamilcar had
80 ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK heartless torturers, escaping with difficulty the severest
-_ . • ^ punishment, were compelled to bury the body of Bostar,
and to treat Hamilcar with humanity.
The silence This is the story as it is found related by a host of
bius^^^" Greek and Boman authors.^ Among these, however, the
most important is wanting. Polybius mentions neither
the embassy of the Carthaginians, nor the tortures of
Eegulus, nor those of Bostar and Hamilcar; and he
observes, as we have seen, the same significant silence with
regard to the alleged ingratitude and treachery of the Car-
thaginians towards Xanthippus.* Moreover, Zonaras, who
copied Dion Cassius, refers to the martyrdom of Regulus
as a rumour.' Besides, there are contradictions in the
various reports. According to Seneca and Florus the
unhappy Begulus wad crucified ; ^ according to Zonaras,
Begulus only pretended he had taken poison, whilst other
authorities say that the Carthaginians really gave it him.
Apart from these contradictions the facts reported are in
themselves suspicious. That the Bomans should not have
agreed willingly to an exchange of prisoners is hardly
credible ; they did it two years later,* and it is highly
probable that Cn. Scipio was thus released from his cap-
tivity.* And can we imagine that the Carthaginians
tortured Begulus in so useless and foolish a manner, at
the same time challenging the Bomans to retaliation?
Were they really such monsters as the Boman historians
liked to picture them?
Probable Such questions and considerations have for a long time
Se^story. ^^>^^ Called forth by the traditional story of the Carthagi-
nian embassy and the death of Begulus. The account of
befriended Regalus in Cftrthage, 88 appears to be intimated by Diodorns
(xxiv. fr. 90, Tauchn.)
' Cicero, Livy, Valerius Maximns, Gellius, Seneca, Florus, Eutropius,
Anrelius Victor, Dion Cassius, Appian, Diodorns, Zonaras.
* See above, p. 71, note 1. * Zonaras, viii. 15.
* Hence poison, hunger, depriration of sleep, and other tortures "were not
sufficient to put an end to the life of R^gulus ; he must also undergo the
ignominious punishment of slares.
* Zonaras, viii. 16. ' See abore, p. 73.
THE FIKST PUNIC WAR. 81
the martyrdom of Begulas has been almost universally CHAP,
regarded as a malicious invention, and the suspicion has s« — ^J.^
arisen that it originated within the family of Eegulus ^^^
itself.* This view is recommended by its internal credi- 254-260
bility. The noble Carthaginian prisoners were given up
probably to the family of the Atilii, as a security for the
exchange of Begulus. But Begulus died in imprisonment
before the exchange could be made. Thinking that cruel
treatment had hastened his death, the widow of Eegulus
took her revenge in the horrible tortures of the two Car-
thaginians, and, to justify this, the story of the martyrdom
of Begulus was invented. But the government and the
Koman people as such took no part in the tortures of
innocent captives ; on the contrary they put an ei^d to the
private revenge as soon as the fact became known. The
senate was not capable of defiling the Boman name by
unheard-of cruelties towards prisoners, and of thus giving
the Carthaginians an excuse for retaliation.' Only to the
revengeful passion of a woman, not to the whole Boman
people, may be attributed such utter contempt of all human
find divine law as is represented in the cruelties practised
towards the Carthaginian prisoners. If we take this view
of the story we shall find it improbable that Begulus
took a part in the embassy of the Carthaginians,' what-
ever we may think of the authenticity of the embassy
itself.
Fourth Period, 250-249 B.C.
LILTB^UM AND DBEPANA.
The brilliant victory at Panormus had inspired the EflTecteof
Bomans with new hopes, and had perhaps raised their of p]^-^
demands. They determined to complete the conquest of ^^«
Sicily,^ and to attack the last and greatest strongholds of
> This was surmised as early as the sixteenth century by Palmer (Exeroit
in Auctor. Grae. p. 151). See Niebuhr, Bom, Gesch, iii. 705; English
translation, iii. 599. ' Diodorus, xziy. p. 91 (Tauchn.)
' Polybius' silence seems to be almost condnsiTe.
« Polybins, i. 41, § 2.
VOL. II. O
82
ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK
IV.
^ . '
Attack on
lilybflemn
by the
Romans.
the Carthaginians in that island, namely Liljbsenm and
Drepana.
Liljbaeum (the modem Marsala), situated on a small
strip of land, terminated by the promontory of the same
name, 'was founded after the destruction of the island
town of Motye, and had been since that event the chief
fortress of the Carthaginians.' Besieged by Dionysius in
the year 368 B.C., and by Pyrrhus in 276 B.o., it had
proved its strength, and had remained unconquered. Nature
and art had joined hands in making this fortress in-
vincible, if defended with Punic fanaticism.* Two sides
of the town were washed by the sea, and were protected,
not only by strong walls, but more especially by shallows
and sunken rocks, which made it impossible for any but the
most skilful pilots or the most daring sailors to reach the
harbour. On the land side the town was covered by strong
walls and towers, and a moat one hundred and twenty feet
deep and eighty feet broad. The harbour was on the
north side, and was inclosed with the town in one line of
fortifications.' The garrison consisted of the citizens
and 10,000 infantry, mostly mercenaries, not to be relied
on, and a strong division of horse.* It was impos-
sible to take such a maritime fortress without the co-
operation of a fleet. The Romans y^ere obliged to make
up their minds to build a new fleet, in spite of their
* See above, p. 26, note 1.
* See Schubring on * Motye-Lilybseum ' in the PhUologus of 1866. The site
of the ancient Lilybseum is partially covered by the modern Marsala.
' This port is now silted up and useless, and where the Carthaginian galleys
rode there are now saltworks. But during the whole of antiquity the port of
Lilybseum was highly esteemed. It was here that in the first year of the
Hannibalian war, the consul Sempronius collected a fleet for his intended
expedition to Africa ; from this port Scipio sailed, and in later times it was a
station for part of the Homan fleet. The Arabs called it Mars Alia, the
haven of God, whence the modem name of Marsala. The total destruction of
the port was probably eflTected by Bon Juan of Austria, who wished to make it
useless for the Barbaresk pirates. The modern port of Marsala is on the
south side of the town, and formed by an artificial mole.
* According to Diodorus (xziv. fr. 1) Uie cavalry amounted to 7,000, and
the infantry, including the inhabitants capable of bearing arms, to 60,000 men.
Both statements seem vastly exaggerated.
THE FIRST PUNIC WAR. 88
resolution three years before.' The two consuls of the year
250, C. Atilius Regulas and L. Maulius Yulso, of whom
one was a kinsman, the other the colleague, of M. Begulus p^^"
of the year 256, sailed towards Sicily with two hundred 250-249
ships, and anchored before the harbour of Lilybeeum, partly ^'^'
to cut off the town from supplies, and partly also to prevent
the Carthaginian fleet from interrupting the landing of
necessaries for the large besieging army.^
The Boman land army consisted of four legions, which. Number of
with the Italian aUies, made together about 40,000 men. In ^^ )^'
addition to these, there were the Sicilian allies, and the
crews of the fleet, so that the report of Diodorus does not
seem improbable, that the besieging army amounted
altogether to about 110,000 men. To supply such an
immense number of men with provisions, at the furthest
comer of Sicily, and to bring together all the implements
and materials for the siege, was no small labour ; and as
the task extended over many months, this undertaking
alone was calculated to strain the resources of the republic
to the very utmost.
The siege of Lilybseum lasted almost as long as the Ihiration
fabulous siege of Troy, and the hardly less fabulous one l[^
of Yeii, with this difference ouly, that Lilybseum resisted
successfully to the end of the war, and was delivered up
to the Romans only in accordance with the terms of peace.
We have no detailed account of this protracted struggle,
but it is on the whole pretty clearly narrated in the
masterly sketch of Polybius, which possesses a greater
interest for us than any part of the military history of
» Polybius, i. 39.
' It is not probable, dot attested by any ancient; writer^ that, as Mommsen
supposes {Rom. Gesch. i. 533 ; English translation, ii. 49) the Roman fleet
sailed right into the harbour of Lilybeeum. On this supposition it would be
unintelligible why the Romans three times endeavoured to block up the
entrance to the harbour. Fiobably the anchoring-grouud in the harbour was
so near to the walls that ships stationed there were exposed to be attacked or
even fired from the walls. Again in the last year of the war, when the
Roman ships occupied the harbour of Brepana, they did not venture into that
of Lilybeeum (Polybius, i. 59, § 9), but remained in the neighbouring bays
and roadsteads.
o 2
84
EOMAN HISTORY.
BOOK
IV.
Modes of
siege in
ancient
warfare.
Borne of the preceding periods. We see here exemplified
not only the art of siege, in it€ most important features,
as practised by the ancients, but we discern in it clearly
the character of the two belligerent nations, the bearing of
their strong and their weak points on the prosecution of
the war ; and we shall feel ourselves rewarded therefore by
bestowing a little more attention on this memorable con-
test than we have given to any previous events in the
military history of Borne.
In the art of besieging towns the Bomans were but
little advanced before their acquaintance with the Greeks,
and even among the Greeks it was long before the art
reached the highest point of perfection that it was
capable of attaining in antiquity. Trenches and walls
were the material difficulties with which besiegers had to
contend. Before the walls could be attacked, the trenches
must be filled up, and this was done with fascines and
earth. As soon as the trenches were so far filled up as
to allow a passage, wooden besieging towers and rams
were pushed forward. These towers consisted of several
stories, and were higher than the walls of the town. On
the different stories soldiers were placed, armed with
missiles, for the purpose of clearing the walls, or of reach-
ing them by means of drawbridges. The rams were long
beams, with iron heads, suspended under a covering roof,
and were swung backwards and forwards by soldiers
to make breaches in the walls. These two operations
were the most important. They were supported by the
artillery of the ancients— the large wooden catapults and
ballistse, a kind of gigantic crossbows, which shot off
heavy darts, balls, or stones against the besieged. Where
the nature of the ground permitted, mines were dug
under the enemy's fortifications, and supported by beams.
If these beams were burnt, the walls above immediately
gave way. Against such mines the besieged dug counter-
mines, partly to keep off the advance of the underground
attack, and partly to undermine the dam and to over-
throw the besieging towers that were standing on it.
ww^fmv^^^vmi^^ " "niu^
THE FIRST PUNIC WAR. 8o
All these different kinds of attack and defence were CHAP.
resorted to at Liljbeeum. The Bomans employed the ^ , ' ^
crews of their ships for the works of the siege,' and by p^^^
the aid of so many hands they soon succeeded in filling 250-249
up part of the town trench, while by their wooden towers, "'*''
battering-rams, protecting roofs, and projectiles, they ^^^'^
approached the wall, destroying seven towers at the point the siege
where it joined the sea on the south, and thereby opening ^^i^^'
a wide breach. Through this breach the Bomans made
an attack, and penetrated into the interior of the place.
But here they found that the Carthaginians had built up
another wall behind the one which had been destroyed.
This fact, and the violent resistance opposed to them in
the streets, compelled them to retreat. Similar attempts
were often made. Day after day there were bloody
combats, in which more lives were lost than in open
battle.^ In one of these, it is said, the Bomans lost 10,000
men.* The losses on the Carthaginian side were probably
not less. Under such circumstances, the ability of the
besieged to resist had diminished considerably. En-
thusiasm and patriotism alone can inspire courage in a
reduced and exhausted garrison. But enthusiasm and
patriotism were just the qualities least known in the
Carthaginian mercenaries. Above all others the Gallic
soldiers were the most vacillating and untrustworthy.*
They were inclined to mutiny ; * some of their leaders
secretly went over to the Bomans and promised them to
induce their countrymen to revolt. All would have been
lost, if Himilco had not been informed of the treachery by
a faithful Greek, the Achaean Alexon. Not venturing to
act with severity, be determined by entreaties, by pre-
sents, and by promises to keep the mercenaries up to
their duty. This scheme succeeded with the venal bar-
barians. When the deserters approached the walls and
« Polybius, i. 49, { 1. « Polybins, i. 42, § 13.
' Biodoms, xxiv. fr. 1. This eyidently exaggerated statement seems
traceable to Philiniis.
* Polybius, ii. 7, § 5. * Polybins, i. 43. Zouaras, Tiii. 15.
86
ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK
IV.
f
Move-
meota of
Adherbal
and the
Cartha-
ginian
fleet.
Relief of
LiljrbfBum
by
Hannibal.
invited their former comrades to mutiny, they were driven
back by stones and arrows.
Many months had passed since the beginning of the
blockade. While the Boman army had inclosed the town
on the land side by a continuous circumvallation and
trenches which extended in a half circle from the northern
to the southern shore, the fleet had blockaded the har-
bour and endeavoured to obstruct all entrance by sinking
stones.^ Lilybseum was thus shut off from all communica-
tion with Carthage, and was left to itself and the courage of
its garrison. But it was neither forgotten nor neglected.
It might be supposed in Carthage that a town like Lily-
bceum would be able to hold out for some months yrithout
needing aid, and it had been well supplied with provisions
before the siege began. It was well known also that if it
were necessary to break through the blockade, the Boman
ships would not be able to hinder it. Probably the
greater part of their ships were drawn up on shore, while
the rowers were employed in filling up the moat. Some
few ships might be out at sea, or might be lying at
anchor, ready to sail, in well-protected roadsteads ; but
the violent storms, and the still more dangerous shallows
of that coast, rendered it impossible for the Boman
captains to make the blockade of Lilybseum effective.
The Carthaginian fleet which was stationed at Di^epana,
under the command of Adherbal, instead of attacking the
Boman fleet before Lilybseum, made use of the time to
scour the coasts of Italy and Sicily, and to hinder the
conveyance of provisions for the supply of the immense
besieging army.
Meanwhile an expedition was fitted out in Carthage for
reinforcing and victualling the garrison of Lilybseum,
An enterprising admiral called Hannibal, a man not rxa-
worthy of this great name, sailed with fifty ships and
10,000 men from Africa* to the ^gatian Islands, west of
Lilybseum. Here he lay, quietly hoping for a favourable
' Diodorus, xziv. fr. 1. Fifteen ships laden with stonce were snnk.
' Polybius, i. 44, J 2. According to Diodorus (xxiv. ft. 1), t)ie foic«
THE FIRST PUNIO WAK.
87
wind.* At last it blew strong from the west; Hannibal
now unfurled all sail, and without paying attention to
the Soman ships, but still fully equipped for an en-
counter, steered through the difficult channels between
cliffs and sandbanks towards the entrance of the harbour,
where the stones which the Eomans had sunk had long
since been washed away by the storms. The Eomans,
seized with astonishment and admiration, dared not ob-
struct the way of the Carthaginian vessels, which shot
past them heavily laden, and with their decks crowded
with soldiers, ready for battle.^ The walls and towers of
Lilybseum were lined with its valiant defenders, who,
with mingled fear and hope, looked on at the grand spec-
tacle. The harbour was gained without loss. The com-
plete success of this undertaking inspired the besieged
with fresh hope and courage, and gave the Bomans warn-
ing that Lilybseum was not likely soon to be in their
power.
Himilco determined to avail himself of the enthusiasm
which Hannibal's arrival had stirred up. Sallying out on
the following morning, he made an attempt to destroy
the machines for the siege. But the Bomans had antici-
pated this, and offered obstinate resistance. The battle
was long undecided, especially near the Eoman works,
which the Carthaginians tried in vain to set on fire. At
length Himilco saw the futility of his attempt, and com-
manded a retreat. In this manner the Eoman soldiers
were compensated for the vexation which the superiority
of their enemies at sea had caused them on the previous
day.
ftmounted to 40,000 men. He relates some interesting details, but on the
whole his narrative is confused and inaccurate.
* It has been asked (Haltaus, Gesch, der Somer^ i. 384) why the Bomans did
not attack him. The reply to this question is contained in what has been stated
in the text. Most of the Boman ships were drawn ashore, the crews were
employed at the siege-works, and a great number of the men had already
perished.
* According to Folybius (i. 44, { 4)^ the Romans feared to be drifted into
the harbour. This shows clearly that the harbour was untenable for Boman
ahips. See abo?e, p. 83, note 2.
CHAP.
in.
^ 1 '
FOUBTH
Pkbiod,
250-249
B.C.
TJnBQCcess-
ful
attempt of
Himilco to
destroy the
Boman
works.
88
ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK
IV.
^ »
DepArture
of Hanni-
bal with
his fleet.
Captore
of the
Rhodian
Hannibal.
The nighfc following, Hannibal sailed away again witli
his fleet. He went to Drepana, taking with him the horse-
men, who till now had lain in Liljbsenm, and were of
no use there, while in the rear of the Boman army they
could do excellent service, partly in harassing the enemy,
and partly in obstructing the arrival of provisions by
land.^
The bold exploit of Hannibal had proved that the port
of Lily bfieum was open to a Carthaginian fleet. From this
time even isolated vessels ventured in and out, and defied
the slow Boman cruisers, who gave themselves useless
trouble to intercept them. A Carthaginian captain, called
the Bhodian Hannibal, made himself specially conspicuous
by eluding the Romans in his fast-sailing trireme, slipping
in between them and purposely allowing them almost to
reach him, that he might make them the more keenly
feel his superiority. The Romans, in their vexation, now
sought again to block up the mouth of the harbour. But
the storms and the floods mocked their endeavours. The
stones, even in the act of sinking, Polybius says, were
thrown on one side of the current ; ^ but in one place
the passage was narrowed, at least for a time, and, luckily
for the Romans, a quick-sailing Carthaginian galley' ran
agpx>und there, and fell into their hands. Manning it
with their best rowers, they waited for the Ehodian, who,
coming out of the harbour with his usual confidence, was
now overtaken. Seeing that he could not escape by dint
of speed, Hannibal turned round and attacked his pur-
1 Diodonu (xxiv. fr. 1) relates that 7.000 horse, which in the beginning of
the siege formed part of the garrison, were afterwards sent to Drepana because
they were of no use in Lilybenm. He does not state the time when this was
done. The inference contained in the text seems obvious. The caralry could
not leave Lilybieum by land, as the Romans, in the very beginning of the
siege, had drawn a ditch and mound all along the land side of Lilybieum from
sea to sea. The first opportunity for diHpatching the caraliy by sea to
Drepana presented itself when Hannibal left the port of Lilybeum, and could
as easily take the men and horses as ballast.
« Polybius, i. 47, { 4.
■ This fast galley was a rtrpifpfis (quadriremis), ix, a vessel with four rows
of oars. — ^Polybius, i. 47) f 5.
THE FIRST PUNIC WAR. 89
sners ; but he was unequally matched in strength, and was CHAP.
taken prisoner with his ship. >, , ' *
Trifling encounters like these could have but little fl^^™
influence on the progress of the siege. Slowly, but securely, 250-249
the Eoman works proceeded. The dam which levelled the ^'^'
filled-up moat became broader and broader ; the artillery ^*e »^-*^
and batterin&f-rams were directed against the towers Bon of
T '1 T\
which still remained standing ; mines were dug under the ^ ^ "^"
second inner wall, and the besieged were too weak to keep
pace with the works of the Romans by counter-mines.
It appeared that the loss of Lilybfieum was unavoid-
able unless the besieged should receive some unlooked-for
aid.
In this desperate situation Himilco determined to repeat, Destruc-
under more favourable circumstances, the attempt which R^man
had once so signally failed.* One night, when a gale si^g©-
works
of wind was blowing from the west, which overthrew
towers and made the buildings in the town tremble and
shake, he made a sally, and this time he succeeded in
setting fire to the Soman siege-works. The dry wood
was at once kindled, and the violent wind fanned the flame
into ungovernable fury, blowing the sparks and smoke
into the eyes of the Romans, who in vain called up all
their courage and perseverance in the hopeless contest
with their enemies and the elements. One wooden struc-
ture after another was caught by the flames, and burnt to
the ground. When the day dawned, the spot was covered
with charred beams. The labour of months was destroyed
in a few hours, and for the present all hope was lost of
taking Lilybeeum by storm.
The consuls now changed the siege into a blockade, a Persever-
plan which could not hold out any prospect of success so ^^^m ^*
long as the port was open. But it was not in the nature
of the Romans easily to give up what they had once
undertaken. Their character in some measure resembled
that of the bull-dog, which when it bites will not let
» Polybiug, i. 48.
90 EOMAN HISTORY.
BOOK go. The circumyallations of the town were strengthened,'
— , ' ,^ the two Kotnan camps on the north and south ends of this
line were well fortified; and, thus protected against all
possible attacks, the besiegers looked forward to the time
when they might resume more vigorous operations.
Their For the present this was not possible. The Boman
m^ultiee, a,rmy had suffered great losses, not only in battle, but in
the labours and privations of so prolonged a siege. The
greatest difficulty was to provide an army of 100,000 men
with all necessaries at such a distance from Bome.^ Sicily
was quite drained and impoverished. Hiero of Syracuse,
it is true, made every effort in his power, but his power
soon reached its limit. Italy alone could supply what was
necessary, but even Italy sorely felt the pressure of the
war. The Punic fleet of Drepana commanded the sea^
and the dreaded Numidian horsemen, the ^ Cossacks of
antiquity,' overran Sicily, levied heavy contributions from
the friends of the Eomans, and seized the provisions which
were sent by land to the camp of Lilybseum.
The winter The winter had come, with its heavy rains, its storms,
and all its usual discomforts. One of the two consuls, with
two legions, returned home ; the rest of the army remained
in the fortified camp before Lilybseum. The Boman
soldiers were not accustomed to pass the bad season of the
year in tents, exposed to wet, cold, and all kinds of priva-
tions. They were in want of indispensable necessaries.
The consuls had hoped to be able in the course of the
summer to take Lilybeeum by storm,' and therefore the
troops were probably not prepared for a winter campaign.
Added to all this came hunger, the worst of all evils at
this juncture, bearing in its train ravaging sickness.
Ten thousand men succumbed to these sufferings,^ and the
survivors wei*e in such pitiable case that they were like a
besieged garrison in the last stage of exhaustion.
' Thns is explained the fact that Poljbius speaks twice of the construc-
tion of lines of circumvallation— i. 42, { 8, and i. 48, §10.
' The siege of Sebastopol, 1854-d5, affords a parallel case and an illus-
tration. ' Pulybius, i. 41, § 4. * Diodorus, loc* cit. p. 86.
THE FIKST PUNIC WAR. 91
In Rome it was felt that the Eoman fleet, which lay CHAP,
useless on the shore, must be once more equipped. The — L, — ^
following year therefore (249) the consul P. Claudius ll^™
Pulcher, the son of Appius Claudius the Blind, was sent to 250-249
Sicily with a new consular army, and a division of 10,000
recruits as rowers, to fill up the gaps which fatigue, priva- cjau?iiw
tions, and sickness had caused in the crews of the fleet. Pulcher at
The object of this reinforcement could only be that of "P*^**
attacking the Carthaginian fleet under Adherbal in Dre-
pana, for this fleet was the chief cause of all the misery
which had befallen the besieging army. Claudius had
without doubt received an express order to hazard a battle
by sea. It was nothing but the ill- success of this under-
taking that made him afterwards an object of the accusa-
tion and reproaches which all unsuccessful generals have
to expect. He began by re-establishing strict discipline
in the army, and thus he made many enemies. He then
vainly sought once more to block up the entrance to the
harbour of Lilybaeum, and thus to cut oflf the supply of
provisions to the town, which during the winter had been
effected without any difficulty. His next step was to equip
his fleet, mixing the new rowers with those still left of the
old ones, and manning the ships with the picked men of
the legion, especially volunteers, who expected certain
victory and rich spoil ; and, after holding a council of war,
in which his scheme was approved, he sailed away from
Lilybseum in the stillness of midnight, to surprise the
Carthaginian fleet in the harbour of Drepana, which he
reached the following morning. Keeping his ships on the
right close to shore, he entered the harbour, which, on the
south of a crescent-shaped peninsula, opens out towards
the west in the form of a trumpet. Adherbal, though un-
prepared and surprised, formed his plans without delay, and
his arrangements for the battle were made as soon as the
ships of the enemy came in sight. His fleet was promptly
manned and ready for the engagement; and while the
Romans sailed slowly in at one side of the harbour, he left
it on the other and stood out to sea. Claudius, to avoid
92
ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK being shut up in the haxbour, gave the order to return.
. ' - WhUe the Soman ships were one after another obeying
this order, they got entangled, broke their oars, hampered
each other in their movements, and fell into helpless
confusion. Adherbal seized the opportunity for making
the attack. The Eomans, close to the shore and in the
greatest disorder and dismay, were unable to retreat,
manoeuvre, or assist each other. Almost without resist-
ance they fell into the hands of the Carthaginians, or
were wrecked in the shallows near the neighbouring coast.
Only thirty ships out of two hundred and ten escaped.
Ninety-three were taken with all their crews; the others
were sunk or run ashore. Twenty thousand men,' the
flower of the Soman army, were taken prisoners. Eight
thousand were killed in battle, and many of those who
saved themselves from the wrecks fell into the hands of
the Carthaginians when they reached the land. It was a
day of terror, such as Rome had not experienced since the
Allia — the first great decisive defeat by sea during the
whole war, disastrous by the multiplied miseries which it
occasioned, but still more disastrous as causing the pro-
longation of the war for eight years more.*
Dictator- The consul Claudius escaped, but an evil reception
AtUius awaited him in Eome. It was not customary, it is true,
Cdlatinus. f^j. ^jj^g Romans to nail their unsuccessful generals to the
cross, as the Carthaginians often did ; on the contrary,
like Sulpicius after the Allia, and like Yarro, at a later
period, after Cann», they were treated mostly with
^ Polybius (i. 51) does not state the total of the Roman fleet, but mentions
only the number of the ships that escaped (30), and of those that were taken
with their crews (93). This makes 123 in all. Orosius (iv. 10) gives in
round numbers 120 ships as the strength of the Roman fleet, reckoning 90 as
taken and 30 as saved. But Diodonis (xziv. fr. 1) states the numberof Roman
▼easels as 210, and Eutropius (ii. 26) even at 220. The latter writer agrees
with FolybiuM and Orosius in giving 90 and 30 as the numbers of the captured
and saved vessels respectively. The rest, he says, were sunk. According to
his calculation they amounted to 100. It is strange that Polybius does not
refer to these, and it is not likely that he includes them among the 93 vessels
taken. He also omits all mention of the number of killed and of the prisoners
taken, which we borrow from Orosius.
« Polybius, i. 49-61.
THE FIRST PUNIC WAR.
93
indulgence, and sometimes with honom*. But Claudius
belonged to a house which, although one of the most dis-
tinguished among the Boman nobility, had many enemies,
and his pride could not stoop to humility and conciliation.
With haughty mien and lofty bearing he returned to
Bome; and when he was requested to nominate a dictator,
as the necessities of the republic were urgent, he named,
in utter contempt of the public feeling, his servant and
client Glicia.* This was too much for the Eoman senate.
Glicia was compelled to lay down the dictatorship, and
the senate, setting aside the old constitutional pra<^tice,
and dispensing with the nomination by the consul, ap-
pointed A. Atilius Calatinus, who made Metellus, the hero
of Panormus, his master of the horse. After the ex-
piration of his year of office, Claudius was accused before
the people on a capital charge, and only escaped con-
demnation by the timely outburst of a thunderstorm,
which interrupted the proceedings.' It seems, however,
that he was afterwards condemned to pay a fine.' Hence-
forth he disappears from the page of history. It is un-
certain whether he went into exile, or whether he soon
died. At any rate he was not alive three years later, for
it is reported that at that time, his sister, a Claudian as
proud as himself, said once, when annoyed by a crowd in
the street, she wished her brother were alive to lose
another battle, that some of the useless people might be
got rid of.*
The hypocritical piety of a time in which the whole of
religion was nothing but an empty form, attributed the
defeat at Drepana to the godlessness of Claudius. On
the morning of the battle, when he was informed that
the sacred fowls would not eat, he ordered them, it is said,
to be cast into the sea, that at least they might drink.
It is a pity that anecdotes such as these are so related by
^CHAP.
IIL
FOUBTH
Period,
250-249
B.C.
Alleged
profanity
of
Claudinfl.
' Livy, epit. 19 ; Saetonius, Tib. 2. ' Valerius Mazimus, viii. 1, 4.
* PolybiuB, i. 62, J 3.— Scholia Bobiensia ad Cicer. De Natura Deorvm^
ii. 3, 7.
* Gelliufl, z. 6 ; Suetoniu*, Tib. 2.
94 BOMAN HISTORY.
BOOK Cicero as to leave the impression that he himself recog-
_i^ Bised the wrath of the avenging gods in the fate of
ClandiuB. Perhaps the story is not true, but like so many
similar tales it was inspired by pious terror' after the day
of the misfortune.* If it could, however, be proved to be
true, it would show that the national faith had dis-
appeared among the higher classes of the Eoman people
in the first Punic war. For a single individual would
never venture on such ridicule of the popular super-
stitions if he were not sure of the approval of those on
whose opinion he lays great weight. That the ' sacred
fowls and the whole apparatus of auspices had not the
smallest share in determining the result of the battle, the
Bomans knew, in the time of Claudius and of Cicero, as
well as we do. The reason of the defeat lay in the
superiority of the Carthaginian admiral and seamen, and
the inexperience of the Boman consul and crews. The
Iloman nation ought to have accused itself for having
placed such a man as Claudius at the head of the fleet,
and for having manned the vessels with men who for the
most part could work with the plough and the spade, but
who knew nothing of handling an oar. The misfortune
of Eome is attributable to the cumbersome Eoman ships,
and to the 10,000 newly levied rowers, who were sent by
land to Shegium, and from Messana to Lilybseum, and
who probably knew nothing of the sea.'
Energy of The Carthaginians made the best use of their success,
thaginians. Immediately after their victory at Drepana, a division
of their fleet sailed to Panormus, where Roman transport
' It was a consolation to feel, as Floras (ii. 2) says, 'that Claudius was
overthrown, not by the enemy, but by the gods themselves, whose auspices he
had despised/
• The first who reports it is Cicero, De Natvra Deorum^ ii. 3, 7.
' This confirms our hypothesis that in the first Roman fleet the great
majority of the crews coosisted, not of landsmen, but of veteran seamen.
These also manned the Roman fleet that was victorious at Ecnomus. The
los^j of thrse men in war and shipwrecks explains the failure of the second
expedition in the African Syrtis, and the great disasters on the coast of Sicily
and Italy (255 and 253 b.c.)i whilst tlie aseiduous practice of the rowers in
241 B.C. accounts for the victoiy at the iEgatian Islands. — ^Polybius, i. 59, ] 12.
THE FIRST PUNIC WAR. 96
ships lay with provisions for the army before Lilybseum. CHAP.
These now fell into the hands of the Carthaginians, and , — , ' ^^
served to supply the garrison of Lilybseum abundantly, p^^^
while the Romans before the walls were in want of the 250-249
merest necessaries. The remainder of the Boman fleet
was now attacked at Lilybeeum. Many ships were burnt,
others were drawn from the shore into the sea, and
carried away; at the same time Himilco made a sally
and attacked the Boman camp, but had to retreat without
accomplishing his purpose.
The disaster of Drepana was soon after almost equalled Dostruc-
by another calamity. Whilst the consul P. Claudius p^man
attacked the Carthaginian fleet with such bad success, his fleet and
colleague L. Junius PuUus, having loaded eight hundred shlps^°
transports in Italy and in Sicily with provisions for the "°^?^ ^•
army, had sailed to Syracuse. With a fleet of a hundred ' "
and twenty ships of war, he wished to convoy this great
number of vessels along the south coast of Sicily to Lily-
beeum. But the provisions had not yet all arrived in
Syracuse when the necessities of the army compelled him
to send off at least a part of the fleet under the protection
of a proportionate number of war ships. These now sailed
round the promontory of Pachynus (Cape Passaro), and had
advanced as far as the neighbourhood of Ecnomus, where
the Bomans seven years before had gained their most
brilliant naval victory over the Punians, when they sud-
denly found themselves face to face with a powerful hostile
fleet consisting of a hundred and twenty ships. There was
nothing left for them but to shelter their vessels as well
as they could along the shore. But this could not be
effected without much loss. Seventeen of their war ships
were sunk, and thirteen were rendered useless ; of their
ships of burden, fifty went down. The others kept close to
the shore, under the protection of the troops and of some
catapults from the small neighbouring town of Phintias.
After this partial success the Carthaginian admiral
Carthalo waited for the arrival of the consul, hoping that
he, with his ships of war, would accept battle. But when
96
ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK
IV.
Seizure of
the temple
of the
Eiycinian
VenuB by
the consul
Junius.
Junius became aware of the state of things, he immediately
turned back, to seek shelter in the harbour of Syracuse
for himself and his great transport fleet. Himilco fol-
lowed him and overtook him near Camarina. Just at this
time signs were seen of a storm gathering from the south,
which on this exposed coast involves the greatest danger.
The Carthaginians, therefore, gave up the idea of atta-cking,
and sailed in great haste in the direction of the promontory
Pachynus, behind which they cast anchor in a place of
safety. The Boman fleet, on the other hand, was overtaken
by the storm, and suffered so terribly that of the trans-
port ships not one was saved, and of the hundred and
five war ships, only two. Many of the crew may have
saved themselves by swimming to land, but the provisions
were certainly all lost.*
The destruction of this fleet crowned the series of mis-
fortunes which befell the Eomans in the year 249 b.o., the
most dismal time of the whole war. It seemed impossible
to fight against such adverse fate, and voices were heard
in the senate urging the termination of this ruinous war.'
But pusillanimity in trouble had no place in the Eoman
character. A defeat only acted as a spur to new exertions
and more determined perseverance. Immediately after
the great losses at Drepana and Camarina, the consul
Junius resumed the attack, as though he would not allow
the Carthaginians time to be aware of having gained
any advantage. A large portion of his crew had been
saved. He was able therefore to bring reinforcements into
' The report of Diodorus (xxiv. fr. 1) is more full, and sf^ems more accurate
than that of Polybius (i. 52-54), who betrays the wish to attribute the losses
of the Romans more to the action of the elements than to the courage of the
Carthaginians. Moreover, Folybius is here guilty of an error, in calling the
consul Junius the successor of Claudius, instead of his colleague, and there-
fore placing the destruction of the Roman fleet at Camarina in the year 248
instead of 249.
' Zonaras (viii. 1 5) reports that a senator who spoke in favour of peace was
immediately killed in the senate-house. It is hardly necessary to say that
this is an invention. Perhaps it came from a Carthaginian source, for no one
acquainted with the dignity and sobriety of the Boman senate could have
thought such an act possible.
THE FIRST PUNIC WAR. 9t
the camp before Lilybseum, and he succeeded in establish- CHAP,
ing himself at the foot of Mount Eryx, not far from Drepana, s.^^ — ,-1^^
which town he partially blockaded in the hope that he p^^™
might thus prevent the Carthaginians sallying thence 260-249
and overrunning the country. Hamilcar had destroyed ^'^' _
the old town of Eryx some years before,^ and had settled
the inhabitants in Drepana. On the summit of the moun-
tain, looking over a vast extent of sea, stood the temple of
the Erycinian Venus, which, according to a Eoman legend,
was founded by ^neas, and was one of the richest and
most celeb;rated of ancient temples. This was a strong
position, easily defended; and, after the destruction of the
town of Eryx by the Carthaginians, it had remained in
their possession and was used as a watch tower. Junius,
by a surprise, seized this temple, thus securing a point
which, during the subsequent years of the war, was of
great importance to the Romans.
Another undertaking of Junius was less successAil in its Captnre of
result. He endeavoured to establish himself on the coast f^Q^r^^
between Drepana and Lilybseum on a promontory stretch- thaginians.
ing out into the sea, called ^githallus. Here he was
surrounded by the Carthaginians in the night, and taken
prisoner, with part of his troops.*
Fifth Period, 248-241 B.C.
HAMILCAR BARCAS. BATTLE AT THE iBGATIAN IBLANBS.
PEACE.
Prom this time the character of the war changes. The Ravages of
great enterprises of the previous years were succeeded by ^Linkin
hostilities on a small scale, which could not lead to a final fleet,
decision. The Bomans again gave up the naval war,
and determined to confine themselves to the blockade of
Lilybseum and Drepana. These were the only two places
* See above, p. 60.
' Zonaras, yiii. 15. If it be true, as Cicero reports {De Divin, ii. 33, 21),
that Jonins destroyed himself, this statement may still be reconciled witJi
that of 2iOnara9.
VOL. II. H
98 ItOMAN HISTOBY.
BOOK remaining in Sicily for ihem to conquer. If they could
- ^7' ^ only succeed in blocking up the Carthaginians in these
places, Sicily might be regarded as a Boman possession,
and the object of the war would be attained. This blockade
demanded, it is true, continued sacrifices and exertions.
But during the whole of the war the Carthaginians had
hardly made any attempt to issue from their strongholds
and to overrun Sicily, as in former times. A comparatively
small force, therefore, was sufiScient to observe and to
restrain them. The Carthaginian fleet, which had had
undisputed rule of the sea, could not be warded off in the
same way. It could not be confined and watched in one
place.' The whole extent of the Italian and Sicilian coast
was at all times exposed to its attacks. To meet these
numerous attacks colonies of Boman citizens had been
established in several sea towns. The number of these
was now augmented by the colonies Alsium and Fregellse
— a sign that even the immediate neighbourhood of Bome
was not safe from Carthaginian cruisers. The coast towns
were, however, not entirely helpless, even without the assist-
ance of Boman colonists. As the instance of the small
town Fhintias, on the south coast of Italy, shows,^ they had
catapults and ballistee, which they used as strand batteries
to keep off the enemy's ships. The larger, especially the
Greek towns, were protected by walls, and the peasants in
the open country found in them a temporary refuge, with
their goods and chattels, until the enemy had retreated.
In time the Bomans, Greeks, and Etruscans also practised
this kind of privateering, which, like the piracy of antiquity
in general, and of the middle ages, occupied itself not so
much with the taking of vessels on the high seas as with
pillaging the coasts. War began now to be an occupation
on the Boman side, which enriched a few citizens, whilst
the community at large was impoverished. To what
extent this privateering was gradually carried we learn
> Orosius, IT. 10.
* Here the Bomans drew their ships on shore and defended them vith
aitillezy from Phintias. See above, p. 95.
THE FIRST PTJNIO WAB. 99'
from the story of an attack on the African town Hippo.* chap.
TTT
The Boman adventurers sailed into the harbour, plundered . ' _ -■
fmd destroyed a great part of the town, and escaped at la«t, ^^
though with some trouble, over the chain vdth which the 248-241
Carthaginians had in the meantime attempted to close ^'^*
the harbour.
Two events belonging to the years 248 and 247 may en* Renewal of
able us to form an idea of the situation of the Boman * nce^Tth
republic at this time. These are' the reneYra.1 of the alliance Hiero.
with Hiero, and the exchange of Boman and Carthaginian
prisoners. In the year 263, Borne had granted to Hiero
only a truce and an alliance for fifteen years. During^ this
lon^ and trying period HieK> proved hLelf a faithf^ and
indispensable ally. More than once circumstances had
occurred in which, not merely enmity, but even neutrality
on the part of Hiero would have been fatal to Bome. The
Bomans could not afford to dispense with such a friend.
They therefore now renewed the alliance for an indefinite
period, and Hiero was released from all compulsory
service for the future.
The second event, the exchange of the Boman and Exchange
Carthaginian prisoners,* would not be surprising if it were prisoners
not for the tradition that such a measure had been proposed with
by Carthage three years before (250 B.C.), and rejected by " '^^
Bome on the advice of Begulus. Be this as it may, the
exchange of prisoners in the year 247 cannot be denied,
and it follows that the losses of the Bomans, especially in
the battle of Drepana, were sensibly felt. The consul
Junius was probably among the prisoners now set free.'
In Sicily the war was now locally confined to the ex- Arrival of
treme west. The chief command over the Carthaginians Jamiicar
was given in the year 247 to Hamucar, surnamed Barcas,
that is ^ Lightning,' the great £a.ther of a still greater son —
' Zonaias, viii. 16.
* Zonaraa, viii. 16, Livy, epitr. W.
' It looks reiy much like an empty boast, if the Boman historians reported
that the number of the Carthaginian prisoners was much laiger than that of
the Romans. It seems unlikely that the Carthaginians ever ransomed their
mercenaries. It was probably easier, cheaper, and safer to engage new ones.
e2
100
ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK
IV.
His treat-
ment of
the Gallic
merce-
naries.
Operations
of Hamil-
car.
of Hannibal, wlio made this name above all others a terror
to the Eomans, and crowned it with glory for all time.
Hamilcar, though still a young man, showed at once that
he was possessed of more brilliant military tnlent than
any oflScer whom Carthage had hitheiix) placed in com-
mand of her troops. He was not only a brave soldier but
an accomplished politician.' With the small means
which his exhausted country placed at his disposal, he
was able so to carry on the war for six years longer that
when at last the defeat of the Carthaginian fleet, oc-
casioned by no fault of his, compelled Carthage to make
peace, this peace was made on conditions which left
Carthage an independent and powerful state.
When Hamilcar arrived in Sicily, he found the Gallic
mercenaries in a stat« of mutiny. The prayers, promises,
and donatives by which three years before Himilco had
purchased the fidelity of his mercenaries in Lilybseum,
were more likely to encourage them in their insubordina-
tion than to keep them in strict discipline. DiflFerent
and more efficient means were now applied to coerce
them. The mutineers were punished without mercy. Some
were sent to Carthage or exposed on desert islands, others
thrown overboard, and the remainder surprised and mas-
sacred by night.
In a war carried on with such soldiers, even the best
general had hardly any prospect of success against a
national army like the Boman. So much the more
brilliant appears the genius of the Carthaginian leader,
who made his own personal influence among the troops
supply the place of patriotic enthusiasm. He could
not carry on the war on a grand scale. Neither the
numbers nor the fidelity and skill of his troops were such
that he could venture to attack the Boman armies, which
from their fortified oamps were threatening Lilybseum
and Drepana. Compelled to conduct the war differently,
.
> Biodorus (zxir. 1), following, probably, Fhilinns, applies to bim the
Homeric Terse —
ofjL^tpov /Soo'tAc^s T* it.yct$hs Kpartpds i^ cuxfi'hrfis.
■^ ■■■ r"
^.-i-W-r'-^
- 1^"
«.l w
■J«i
■^ I"
THE FTRST FUNIC WAB.
101
lie took possession of Mount Heircte (now Monte Pelle-
grino), near Panormns, whose precipitous sides made it
a natural fortress, while on its level summit some ground
was left for cultivation, and its nearness to the sea secured
immediate communication with the fleet. While, there-
fore, the Bomaus lay before the two Carthaginian for-
tresses, Hamilcar threatened Panormus, now the most
important possession of the Romans in the whole of Sicily ;
for not only had the reinforcements and supplies of their
army to be forwarded from it, but it was the only place
through which direct communication with Italy by sea
was kept up. By the Carthaginian garrison at Heircte,
not only was the importance of Panormus neutralised, but
its safety was endangered, and Rome was compelled to
keep a large garrison in it.
For three years this state of things continued. From
his impregnable rocky citadel, Hamilcar, as irresistible
as the lightning whose name he bore, attacked the Romans
whenever he chose, by sea or by land, in Italy or in Sicily.
He laid waste the coasts of Bruttium and Lucania, and
penetrated northwards as far as Cumse. No part of Sicily
was secure from his attacks. His adventurous raids extended
as far as Mount ^tna. When he returned from such expe-
ditions he made the Romans feel his presence. The task
of describing the almost iminterrupted fighting between
the Romans and the Carthaginians before Panormus
seemed to Polybius almost as impossible as to follow every
blow, every parry, and every turn of two pugilists.^ The
detail of such encounters escapes observation. It is only
the bearing of the combatants in general and the result
of which we become aware. Hamilcar, with his mercenaries,
supported gloriously and successfully the unequal struggle
with the Roman legions. The war thus waged by him
was a prelude to the battles which his illustrious son was
to fight on Italian soil. At length in the year 244 he left
Heircte unconquered, and chose a new battle-field in a
CHAP.
III.
— — « — — '
Fifth
Period,
248-241
B.C.
Occupa-
tion of
Eryxby
Hamilcar.
" Polybius, i. 67, 1 1.
102
ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK
IV.
Sufferings
of the
Roman
allies.
much more difficult situation on Mount Eryx, in the
immediate neighbourhood of Drepana.* The reason for
this change is not reported. Perhaps it may haye been
the precarious position of Drepana, which the Romans
continued to besiege with increasing vigour. Close by
Drepana, at the foot of the mountain, the Somans had
an intrenched camp. On the summit they held the
temple of Venus. Half way up the hiU, on the slope to-
wards Drepana, lay the ancient town of Eryx, demolished
by the Carthaginians in the fifth year of the war,* but
now partly restored and converted into a Itoman fortifica-
tion. This post Hamilcar surprised and stormed in a
night attack, and then took up a strong position between
the Romans at the foot and those at the top of the moun-
tain. He kept open his communication both with the
sea and with the garrison ut Drepana, though on difficult
roads. It is easy to conceive how dangerous such a
position was in the midst of the enemy. Predatory excur-
sions could hardly be undertaken from this point. Instead
of gain and spoil the soldiers encountered dangers and
privations ; the fidelity of the mercenaries again wavered,
and they were on the point of betraying their position and
surrendering to the Bomans, when the watchfulness of
Hamilcar anticipated their intentions and compelled them
to fiy to the Boman camp to escape his revenge. The
Bomans did what they had never done before. They took
these Grallic troops as mercenaries into their pay.' We
need no other evidence to prove the extremity to which
Bome was now reduced.
The war now really began to undermine the Boman
state. It is impossible to ascertain the weight of the
burdens which fell upon the allies. Of their contri-
butions and their services, their contingents for the
army and the fleet, the Boman historians purposely tell
» Polybius, i. 68, S 2.
• DiodoruB, xxiii. fr. 9. See above, p. 60.
' After the war they got rid of this band,
sent them out of Italy. — Poly bins, ii. 7» § 10.
They disarmed the men and
THE FIRST PUNIC WAR. 108
US nothing. But we know, without any such record, that CHAP,
they furnished at least one-half of the land army, and ™'
almost all the crews of the fleet. The thousands who _f^^^™
Pbbiod,
perished in the battles at sea and in the wrecks were, 248-241
for the most part, maritime allies {socii navales) who had ^'^'
been pressed into the Soman service. Nothing is more
natural than that the extreme misery and horror of the
hated and dreaded service should have excited them to
resistance, which could only be quelled with great diffi-
culty. What Italy sufiFered by the predatory incursions of
the Carthaginians is beyond our calculation. But an
idea of the losses which this war caused to Italy is given
by the census of this time. While in the year 252 b.o.
the number of Eoman citizens was 297,797, it fell to
251,222 in the year 247 B.C., being reduced in five years
by one-sixth.
The prosperity of the people suffered in proportion. General
The trade of Eome and of the maritime towns of Italy J^ment of
was annihilated. The union of so many formerly in- the Roman
dependent political communities into one large state,
which, by putting down all internal wars seemed so likely
to promote peaceful development and progress, involved
them all in the long war with Carthage, and exposed
them all alike to the same distress. One sign of this
distress is the debasement of the coin. Before the war
the old Boman As was stamped, or rather cast, fiill weight.
But by degrees it sank down to one-half, one-third, a
quarter, and in the end to one-sixth of the original
weight, so that a coin of two ounces in weight was sub-
stituted, at least in name, for the original As of twelve
ounces,' by which, of course, a proportionate reduction of
* Asses of the full weight of twelve ounces hare not been preserved. It
is supposed that they were never struck of the faU nominal value, to keep
them from being melted .down for other purposes, and to cover the cose of
minting (Mommsen, Horn, Muneweaeny p. 261). It seems, however, that a
very slight reduction from the full weight would have answered these purposes.
If, therefore, Asses of eleven and even of nine ounces are called heavy or full
Asses, the term is applicable only fh>m the contrast of the later Asses, which
ranged between five and a half and two ounces. It would seem that, in reaUty,
104
ROMAN mSTOEY.
BOOK debts — in otlier words, a general bankruptcy — was caused.
IV' It was natural that in this gradually increasing poverty
of the state, some individuals should become rich. War
has always the effect of injuring general prosperity for
the benefit of a few ; just as diseases, which waste the
body, often swell the growth of one particular part. In
war, certain branches of industry and trade flourish. Ad-
venturers, contractors, capitalists make their most success-
Ail speculations. In antiquity, the booty of war constituted .
a source of great profit for a few, particularly because the
prisoners were made slaves. The armies, accordingly,
w^e followed by a great number of traders who under-
stood how to turn the ignorance and recklessness of the
soldiers to their own advantage, in buying their spoils
and purchasing slaves and articles of value at the
auctions which were held from time to time. Another
mode of acquiring wealth called forth by the war after
the destruction of peaceful industry and trade was pri-
vateering, a speculation involving risks,^ like the slave
trade and the blockade-running of modern times. This
kind of private enterprise had the further advantage
of injuring the enemy, and formed a naval reserve, de-
stined at no distant period to be of the most important
.service.
Tedious The war in Sicily made no progress. The siege of
tionofthe XilybfleTun, which had now continued for nine years, was
^"'* carried on with considerably less energy since the failure
of the first attack, and its object was plainly to keep the
Caxthagimans in tiie town. The lingering siege of Dre-
pana was equally ineffectual. The sea was free, and the
garrisons of both towns were thus furnished with all
necessaries. It was not possible to dislodge Hamilcar from
Mount Eryx. The Boman consuls, who during the last
six years of the war had successively commanded in
.eren the older Assen of eleran or nine onncee were minted in consequence of
an intentional reduction of the standard equivalent to a reduction of debts.
i Old PolyphemuB says of pirates (Homers Odysuy, iz. 255) —
THE FIRST PUNIC WAK. 105
Sicily, could boast of no success whicli might warrant CHAP.
ITT
them in claiming a triumph, in spite of the easy con-
ditions on which this distinction might be obtained. ^^^^
^^ , Period,
At length the Boman government determined to try 248-241
the only^ means by which the war could be brought to ^'^'
an end, and once more to attack the Carthaginians ^*^*^^
by sea. The finances of the state were not in a condition Lutatius
to furnish means for building and equipping a new fleet, ^^j^ ^^
. The Romans therefore followed the example of Athens, and fleet to
Sicily
caUed up the richest citizens, in the ratio of their property,
either to supply ships or to unite with others in doing so.
The Boman historians were pleased to extol this manner
of raising a new fleet as a sign of devotion and patriotism.
It was, however, in reality only a compulsory loan, which
the state imposed upon those who had suffered least from
the war, and had probably enjoyed great gains. The
owners of privateers had the obligation and the means of
supporting the state in the manner just described. A new
fleet of two hundred ships was thus fitted out and sent to
Sicily under the consul C. Lutatius Catulus in the year 242.
The Carthaginians had not thought it necessary to main-
tain a fleet in the Sicilian waters since the defeat of the
Boman navy in the year 249. Their ships were otherwise
engaged in the very lucrative piratical war on the coasts
of Italy and Sicily. Lutatius therefore found the harbour
of Drepana unoccupied. He made some attacks on the
town from the sea and the land side, but his chief
energies were directed to the training and practising of
his crews, thus avoiding the mistake by which the battle
of Drepana was lost. He exercised his men during the
whole of the summer, autumn, and winter in rowing, and
took care that his pilots should be minutely acquainted
with the nature of a coast singularly dangerous from its
many shallows. Thus he anticipated with confidence a
struggle which could no longer be delayed if Carthage did
not wish to sacrifice her two fortresses on the coast.^
' Poljbitts, i. 59. Zonaras, yiii. 17.
106
ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK
IV.
Defeat of
the Car-
thaginians
at the
.^atian
Islands.
Negotia-
tions for
peace.
The die was cast in March the following year (241). A
Carthaginian fleet, heavily laden with provisions for the
troops in Sicily, appeared near the ^gatian Islands. The
object of the. commander was to land the provisions, to
take Hamilcar, with a body of soldiers, on board, and then
to give battle to the Bomans. This object was frustrated
by the promptness of Catnlus, who, although wounded,
took part in the battle after having handed over the com-
mand to the prsetor Q. Valerius Paltx). When the Cartha-
ginians approached with full sail, favoured by a strong
west wind, the Roman ships advanced, and compelled them
to give battle. It was soon decided. A complete and
brilliant yictory crowned the last heroic exertions of the
Eomans. Tifty ships of the enemy were sunk, seventy were
taken with their crews, amounting to 10,000 men ; the rest,
favoured by a sudden change of wind, escaped to Carthage.
The defeat of the Carthaginians was not so great as that
of the Bomans had been at Drepana. But Carthage was
exhausted and discouraged. Perhaps she was alarmed by
the premonitory signs of the terrible war vdth the mer-
cenaries which soon after brought her to the very brink of
ruin. Sicily had now been for several years as good as
lost to the Carthaginians. The continuation of the war held
out to them no prospect of winning back their former pos-
sessions in that island. Carthage therefore decided on pro-
posing terms of peace, and she might entertain the hope
that Borne would be not less ready to bring the war to a
close. The negotiations were carried on by Hamilcar Barcas
and the consul Lutatius as plenipotentiaries. At first
the Bomans insisted on dishonourable conditions. They
demanded that the Carthaginians should lay down their
arms, deliver up the deserters, and pass under the yoke.
But Hamilcar indignatly refused these terms, and declared
he would rather die in battle than deliver up to the enemy
the arms with which he was intrusted for the defence of
his country. Lutatius therefore waived this claim, the
more readily as he wished to bring the negotiations
speedily to an end, in order to secure for himself the credit
THE FIBST PUNIC WAR. 107
of having brought the long war to a close. The prelimi- CHAP.
naries of peace were thus settled. Carthage engaged to > — r^ ^
evacuate Sicily ; not to make war upon Hiero of Syracuse ; ;|^^^^
to give up aH Soman prisoners without ransom, and to pay 248-241
a sum of 2,200 talents in twenty years. On the whole
the Soman senate and people approved of these terms.
The formal conditions of the treaty involved the abandon-
ment by Carthage of the smaller islands between Sicily
and Italy (which was a matter of course), as well as the
mutual obligation that each should refrain from attacking
and injuring the allies of the other, or entering into
an alliance with them ; but the war indemnity imposed
on Carthage was raised by 1,000 talents, to be paid at
once.
Thus ended at length the war for the possession of Position of
Sicily, which had lasted uninterruptedly for three-and- mans at
twenty years, — the greatest struggle known to the genera- the dose
tion then living. The most beautiful island of the
Mediterranean, the possession of which had been contested
for centuries by Greeks and Punians, was wrested from
them both by a people who till quite lately had lain beyond
the horizon of the civilised nations of the ancient world,
which had exercised no influence on their political system
and international dealings, and had never been even taken
into account. Before the war with Pyrrhus, Rome was
among the Mediterranean states of antiquity what Russia
was in Europe before Peter the Great and the war with
Charles XII. By her heroic and successful opposition to
the interference of Pyrrhus in the affairs of Italy, Borne
emerged from obscurity, and made herself known to the
rulers of Egypt, Macedonia, and Syria as a power with
which they might soon have to deal.
After the departure of Pyrrhus (273 b.o.) an Egyptian Embawics
embassy was sent to Some, to offer, in the name of from
King Ptolemy Philadelphus, a treaty of amity, which the ^^^^
Roman senate willingly accepted.' About the same time
I Zonaras, yiii. 6 : Kal Hro\€fuuos 9k 6 ^lAiiScX^or r6tf rt Hhppov Ktut&t
108 ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK messengers came to Eome from Apollonia, a flourishing
IV.
. Greek town on the Adriatic, perhaps for the same purpose.
This was the time when the Greek world was opening to
the flomans, when Greek art, language, and literature made
their first entry into Italy — an event which sixteen centuries
afterwards was to be followed by a second invasion of
Greek learning. The Sicilian war was to a great extent a
Greek war. For the first time all the western Greeks
united in one great league against an ancient foe of the
Hellenic name ; and Rome, which was at the head of this
league, appeared to the Greeks in the mother country, in
Asia and Egypt, more and more as a new leading power
whose friendship it was worth while to secure. No wonder
that the history of this people began now to have the
greatest possible interest for the Greeks, and that the first
attempts of the Romans in writing history were made in
the Greek language, and were intended for the Greek
people.
Changes in While Rome, by the conquest of Sicily, gained, with
taV^nsti- regard to other powers, a position of importance and in-
tutions of fluence, it became unmistakeably clear for the first time
that old institutions, suited for a town community and
for the simplicity of ancient life, were insuflScient for a
more extended field of political and military operations.
The Roman military system was organised for the defence
of narrow boundaries, and not for aggressive warfare in
distant parts. The universal duty of military service and
the periodical formation of new armies, which was a con-
sequence of it, had not appeared prejudicial in the wars
with the Italian nations, who had the same institutions,
and as long as the theatre of war was the immediate
neighbourhood of Rome. When, however, it became no
longer possible to dismiss every legion after the summer
campaign, it was at once seen that a citizen army on the
old plan had great military and economical disadvantages.
The peasants, who were taken from their homesteads, grew
SfutXaylaif hrotfuraro, Valerius Mazimus, iy. 3, 10; Liyy, epit. 14; Dion
Cassius, fr. 121.
B.C.
THE FIEST PUNIC WAB. 109
impatient of prolonged service, or if they were ordered into CHAP.
distant countries like Africa.* It was necessary to steer ^
a middle course, and to let at least one consular army ^ifth
' , •' Period,
return annually from Sicily to Rome.* Only two legions 248-241
wintered regularly at the seat of war, to the great injury
of military operations. Thus the time of service of the
Soman soldiers was lengthened out to a year and a half.
Even this for a continuance caused great difficulty. It
was necessary to offer the soldiers some compensation for
their long absence &om home. This was effected in two
ways, first by allowing them the spoils taken in war, and,
secondly, by offering them a reward after the expiration of
their time of service. The prospect of booty operated on
them much as their pay influenced the mercenaries. It
was a means for making the universal military service less
onerous, for it could not fail to draw volunteers into the
army.' The granting of lands to veterans also served to
render service in the legions less obnoxious. These military
colonies, the traces of which are even now apparent,* are not
' The same causes are in operation even now, and make it impossible in a
oonntry like England to introduce the conscription for military service.
Englishmen will never submit to be forced into military semce abroad,
especially in the colonies. They acknowledge only the general obligation of
defending their own country. For the same reason the French law of con-
scription admits of substitutes. Even in France, the sons of the first fiimilies
would not go to serve on compulsion as common soldiers in Algiers or
Cochin China. During the Crimean war, one-third of the men liable to be
draughted paid for substitutes. In Q«rmany, the universal obligation of serving
in the army can be carried out only because Germany has no colonies and
carries on no wars in distant parts. But even in Germany, the system, if tested
by a long war, would probably break down ; and it is modified to a considerable
extent by the law which enables young men of higher education to go through
their military duties in a single year instead of three.
' This appears to have been the rule, and it was applied even to the corps
which was sent to Africa under Regulus.
' This had always been the practice. But it depended on the decision of
the general whether the booty was to be given to the troops or to be reserved
for the exigencies of the state.
* According to Pliny [Hist Nat. vii. 45), L. Metellns, the victor of Panormus,
was once a member of a commission of fifteen men for the division of land
(quindecimviri agris dandis). We do not know when this commission waa
appointed ; perhaps it was during the last years of the war. An extensive
assignation of land to veteran soldiers took place after the end of the
Hannibalian war. — lavy, zxxi. 41, 49.
110
ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK
IV.
Constitu-
tion of the
Roman
army.
Evil of
annually
elected
generals.
therefore to be regarded as a symptom of tlie disorders of
the state consequent upon the civil wars. They were a
necessary result of the Eoman military system ; * and as
long as there was unoccupied unculfcivated land at the
disposal of the state, such a measure, far from being
hurtful, might even possess great advantages for the well-
being of the state, as well as for the veterans.^
Considering the military training of the Soman soldiers,
and the simplicity of the old tactics, the frequent change
of the men in the legions was of less consequence than
we might suppose, especially as the officers did not, as a
matter of course, leave the service vdth the disbanded
troops. When the rank and file were released from their
military duty, the staflF of the legion, it is true, did not
remain ; but it was in the nature of things that the cen-
turions and military tribunes of a disbanded legion should
be for the most part chosen again to form a new one.
The military service is for the common soldiers only a
temporary duty, but it constitutes a profession for the
officers. The Eoman centurion was the principal nerve of
the legions, and for the most part repaired what the in-
experience of the recruits and the want of skill in the
commanders had spoilt. Begular promotion, according to
merit, secured the continuance of the centurions in the
army, and placed the most experienced of them at the
head of the legion, as military tribunes. They were to
the army what the paid clerks were to the civil magistrates
— the embodiment of professional experience and the
guardians of discipline.
Such men were the more necessary as the Bomans con-
tinued the practice of annually changing their commanders-
1 In a similar manner, in Prussia, and other countries .where the Prussian
military system is adopted, the need is felt of proriding civil employments for
those soldiers who voluntarily serve in the army beyond the term fixed by law.
These men form the staff of non-commissioned officers. They are eminently
qualified for the lower grades of the civil service'.
' After the Crimean war the attempt was made by the Brjliish government to
establish the Oerman Leg;ion as colonists in South Africa. The failure of this
attempt does not prove the system to be vrong.
B.C.
THE FIEST PUNIC WAR. Ill
in-chief. There was no greater obstacle to the military CHAP,
successes of the Sonians than this system.* It suited — , — '
only the old time when the dimensions of the state were ^^^
small. In the annual campaigns against the ^quians 248-241
and the Volscians, which often lasted only a few weeks,
a commander needed no especial military education. But
in the Samnite wars, a perceptible lack of experience, and
more particularly of strategic skill, on the part of the
consuls, delayed the victory for a long time. These
defects were far more deeply felt in Sicily. Before a new
commander had had time to become acquainted with
the conditions of the task before him, even before he
was on an intimate footing with his own troops, or knew
what sort of enemy he had to oppose, the greatest part of
his time of office had probably expired, and his successor
might perhaps be on his way to relieve him. If, urged
by a natural ambition, he sought to mark his consul-
ship by some brilliant action, he was apt to plunge into de-
sperate undertakings, and reaped disgrace and loss instead
of the hoped-for victory. This was the inevitable result,
even if the consuls elected were good generals and brave
soldiers. But the issue of the elections was dependent on
other conditions than the military qualities of the can-
didates, and the frequent election of incapable ofiScers was
the inevitable result. Only when there was an urgent
cause, the people of necessity elected experienced generals.
Under ordinary circumstances, the struggle of parties, or
the influence of this or that family, decided the election
of consuls. The power of the nobility was fuUy established
in the first Punic vrar. We find the same families re-
peatedly in possession of the highest magistracies; and
the fact that military ability was not always required of a
candidate is proved above aU by the election of P. Claudius
Pnlcher, who, like most of the Claudians, seems to have
been a man unworthy of high command.
* Zonaras, yiii. 16 : fi(yurro» ^hp ol *P«/Mubi icipdXXoPTOf tri Kon^ ivuunhp
$X\ovf fW Mpovs tipxovras hrtfitroyf Jkprt 8^ r^v irrpaniyieiy luufBdjfovras t^j
hpxht Ihrcuiov, &ffwtp tit UtrKTifftp <r^as &aV o^k th XP^^f alpo^fitpou
112
ROMAN HISTOIty.
BOOK
IV.
TheEo-
n^ nary
If, in spite of these deficiencies, the result of the war was
favourable to the Bomans, it must be ascribed to their
indomitable perseverance and the keen miUtary instinct
which enabled them always to accommodate themselves to
new circumstances. Of this we have the clearest evidence
in the quickness and facility with which they turned their
attention to the naval war and to siege operations. The
successes of the Bomans at sea may, it is true, be attributed
chiefly to the Greek shipbuilders, and to the Greek
sailors and captains who served on their ships. The
Greeks were also their instructors in the art of be-
sieging towns with the newly invented machines, but the
merit of having applied the new means with courage and
skill belonged nevertheless to the Eomans. The extrava-
gant praise which has been lavished on them on account
of their naval victories, it is scarcely necessary to repeat,
they did not deserve; and it is a disgrace to them,
heightened by the contrast of former times, that they never
afterwards equipped fleets like those which fought at Mylaa
and Ecnomus, and that, at a later period, when their power
was supreme, they allowed the pirates to gain the upper*
hand, until the supplies of the capital were cut off, and the
nobility were no longer safe in Campania, in their own
country seats. This weakness, which became conspicuous
at a later period, confirms our hypothesis of the prominent
share which the Italian and Sicilian Greeks had in the
first organisation of the Boman navy. It is at least a
significant fact that the Hellenic nationaliiy in Italy and
Sicily declined with the decay of the maritime power of
Some.
The merits and defects of the Carthaginian manner of
HarthL?^ conducting the war were very different. The Carthaginians
had standing armies, and they allowed their generals to
keep the command as long as they possessed their confi-
dence. In both these respects they were superior to the
Bomans. But the materials of their armies were not to be
compared to those of their antagonists. • Their soldiers
were mercenaries, and mercenaries of the very worst kind;
Constitn-
tion of t
Caithdgi
nian
armies.
THE FIBST PUNIC WAR. 118
not native but foreign, a motley mixture of Greeks, Gauls, CHAP.
Libyans, Iberians, and other nations, of men without >^
B.C,
either enthusiasm or patriotism, urged only by a desire of ^^^^^
high pay and booty. In the fickleness of these mercena- 248-241
ries, amongst whom the Gauls seem to have been the most
numerous and the least to be trusted, lay the greatest
weakness of the Carfchagmian militaay system. The very
best of their generals did not succeed in educating these
foreign bands to be faithful and steady.^ From the
beginning of the war to its close, examples abound of
insubordination, mutiny, and treachery on the part of the
mercenaries; and of ingratitude, faithlessness, and the
most reckless severity and cruelty on the part of the
Carthaginians. If the mercenaries entered into negotia-
tions with the enemy, betrayed the posts confided to them,
deUvered up or crucified their ofiacers, the Carthaginian
generals intentionally exposed them to be cut to pieces by
the enemy, left them on desert islands to die of hunger,
jthrew them overboard into the sea, or massacred them in
cold blood. The relation of commander and soldier,
which calls on both sides for the greatest devotion and
fidelity, was with the Carthaginians the cause of continued
conspiracy and internal war. The weapon which Carthage
wielded in the war against Bome threatened either to
break with every blow or to wound her own breast. We
know probably only a small part of the disasters which
befell Carthage, owing to the fickleness of her troops. How
many undertakings failed, even in the design, owing to
want of confidence in the mercenary troops, how many failed
in the execution, we cannot pretend to ascertain. So
much, however, is proved to our satisfaction, £rom isolated
statements preserved to us, that the bad faith of the
Carthaginian mercenaries was their chief weakness, and
' Not even Hamilcar Barcas did tliis, though he is especially extolled for
his great influence over the minds of his soldiers, and is said to have
succeeded in inspiring them with deyotion to his own person, as a snhstitnte
for the patriotism which they lacked (Mommsen, Bdm, Geseh., i. 537).
The mercenaries uuder his command mutinied (Zonaras, riii. 16; Polybius,
i- 77* S ^)> '^^^ ^® ^^ ^^^ possess their confidence (^PolybiuSi i. 68, § 12).
VOL. II. I
114
KOMAN mSTOEY.
BOOK
IV.
TheCar-
thafinian
genlrals.
Carthagi*
nian
inferiority
at sea.
spoiled all that by their experience and their skill as
veteran soldiers they might hare accomplished.
We know little of the Carthaginian generals. But
it is clear that on the whole they were superior to the
Boman consuls. Among the latter, not one appears to be
distinguished for military genius. They could lead their
troops against the enemy and then fight bravely; but they
could do nothing more. Metellus, who gained the great
victory at Panormus, was perhaps the only exception; but
even he owed his victory more to the faults of his opponent
and his want of skill in managing the elephants than by
the display of any military talent on his own part ; and
when he commanded the second time as consul, he accom-
plished nothing. On the other hand, it cannot be denied
that Hannibal, the defender of Agrigentum, Himilco, who
had the command for nine years in LUybseum, Adherbal,
the victor at Drepana, and Carthalo, who attacked the
Soman fleet at Camarina and caused its destruction, and
above all HamUcar Barcas, were great generals, who under-
stood not only the art of fighting, but also the conduct
of a war, and by their personal superiority over their
opponents outweighed the disadvantages involved in the
quality of their troops. Among the Carthaginian generals
some, of course, were incapable ; as, for instance, those who
lost the battles of Panormus and the ^gatian Islands.
K the Carthaginians punished these men severely, we may
perhaps be entitled to accuse them of harshness, but not
of injustice ; for we find that other unfortunate generals,
Hannibal, for instance, after his defeat at Mylee, retained
the confidence of the Carthaginian government ; and thus
they punished, it would seem, not the misfortune of the
generals, but some special fault or offence.
The defeats of the Carthaginians at sea are most sur-
prising. The Roman boarding-bridges cannot be re-
garded as the single, or even as the chief, cause of this.
The only explanation which we can offer has been already
given — ^that the Boman fleet was probably for the most part
THE FIBST PUNIC WAR. 115
built and manned hj Greeks ; * and even then it is still
astonishing that the Carthaginians were only once deci-
dedly victorious at sea in the course of the whole war. ^^fth
Fbbiod
Nor can we understand why they did not fit out larger 24S-241
and more numerous fleets, to shut out the Bomans from ''^-
the sea altogether at the very beginning, as England did
with regard to Prance in the revolutionary war. That
they sent no second fleet after the defeat of Ecnomus to
oppose the Bomans, and to prevent their landing in Africa,
and that after their last defeat they broke down all at
once, must, from our imperfect acquaintance with the
internal affairs of Carthage, remain incomprehensible.
Perhaps the financial resources of this state were not so
inexhaustible as we are accustomed to believe.
The peace which handed over Sicily to the Bomans Effect of
affected the power of Carthage but little. Her possessions ^^^^
in Sicily had never been secure, and could scarcely have power of
yielded a profit equal to the cost of their defence. The "^'
value of these possessions lay chiefly in the commerce
with Sicily ; and this commerce could be carried on with
equal ease under Boman rule. Spain offered a rich and
complete compensation for Sicily, and in Spain Carthage
had a much fairer prospect of being able to found a last-
ing dominion, as there she had not to encounter the
obstinate resistance of the Greeks, and as Spain was so
distant from Italy that the Boman interests were not
immediately concerned by what took place in that
coimtry.
> In saying this we of course do not pretend to affirm that no Romans and
other Italians were employed on board the fleet. On the contrary, we know
not only that the socii navales were numerous, but that the naval service was
utterly detested by the Italian allies, and drove them to mutiny and desertion
in large numbers (Livy, xxiv. 23, 10). But as the Romans required thousands
of sailors for their transports, it is probable that they first employed the
untrained landsmen in this department of the service, and thus gradually
trained them to be fit for manning war vessels. As for practising rowing on
land, it may be as feasible as learning to swim without going into the water.
z a
116
ROMAN HISTORY-
CHAPTER IV.
THE WAR OF THE MEBGENARIES, 241-238 B.C.
BOOK
IV.
Rerolt of
tbe Car-
thaginian
allicsw
Cause of
As sometimes the strongest men, when they hare strained
every nerve and have kept np bravely in fighting against
some threatening danger, succumb suddenly at last when
calm and quiet are re-established, and seem doomed to
perish from some internal suffering, so Carthage at the
end of the long war with Home was threatened by a
much more serious evil than that which she had just gone
through. The bad humours in the body of the state,
no longer absorbed by exertion and activity, attacked the
inner parts, and threatened sudden death. A mutiny of the
mercenaries of Carthage, in connection with a revolt of
all the allies and subjects, followed close on the Sicilian
war. Tor more than three years there raged a fearful
strife, accompanied by horrors which show that man can
sink lower than the beasts. The cause of this war was
the great weakness of the Carthaginian state, which,
as we have seen, consisted in the want of a uniform popu-
lation animated by the same sentiments. The mixture of
races, over which Carthage ruled, felt only the increased
burdens of the war with Borne, and not the patriotic en-
thusiasm which lightens every sacrifice. A decisive victory
on the side of Carthage might have inspired her subjects
with the respect and fear which with them had to take the
place of devoted attachment. But Carthage was conquered.
She had, in the eyes of her subjects, lost the right to govern.
It required but a slight cause ^ make the whole proud
edifice of Carthaginian power totter to its foundation.
This cause was the exhaustion of the Carthaginian
241-238
B.C.
the
THE WAR OF THE MERCENARIES. 117
finances. When the mercenaries returned from Sicily, CHAP,
and vainly looked for their overdue pay and the presents
which had been promised to them, discontent and defiance
arose among them, and they made higher and more ex-»
travagant demands when they saw that Carthage was mutiny.
not in a position to oppose them by force. It was now
as difficult to pacifj' them as to bring them back to obe-
dience. Open rebellion broke out, the mutineers and the
allies' made common cause together, and in a short time
all the towns of Libya were in revolt. TJtica and Hippo
Zaritas alone remained faithful. Tunes was in the hands
of the mutineers, who were commanded by the Libyan
Matho, by the Campanian Spendius, and by the Gkkul
Autaritus. The general Hanno, who as their favourite
had been selected by the mercenaries as umpire to decide
the quarrel, was taken prisoner and detained as hostage.
Carthage was surrounded by her numerous enemies, and
seemed hopelessly lost. But the spirit of the Carthagi-
nian population now rose. An army was formed from the
citizens and those mercenaries who had remained faithful,
and Hamilear Barcas took the command. The superiority
of a true general over such chiefs as Matho and Spendius
soon became apparent. The mutineers, although rein-
forced, according to report, by 70,000 Libyans and Numi-
dians, were surprised and defeated again and again.
Hamilear tried demency. He only demLded a promise
from the prisoners not to make war upon Carthage, and
then set them free. But-ihe leaders of the mutineers,
fearing a universal rebellion among their accomplices,
decided on rendering peace with Carthage impossible by
* It is not at all likely that the towns subject to Carthage were in an
enviable position. It was the general practice in antiquity, and even in modem
times down to a recent period, for a governing country to treat dependencies
and colonies as inferiors, and to aim chiefly at deriving from them the largest
possible profit. If the Carthaginians, as is reported (Appian, v. 3), caused
3,000 of their subjects, who had joined Regulus, to be crucified, it seems
natural that the Libyans should now make common cause with the mutinous
soldiers. There seems to be, however, no sufficient ground for charging the
Carthaginians with unusual and exceptional cruelty (Mommsen, S&m,
Gesch,, i. 547).
118 ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK an act of barbarous treachery. They caused the im*
IV.
' prisoned Hanno and seven hundred Carthaginians to die
a cruel death, and even refused to give up the bodies for
burial. The war had now assumed its real character,^
and only the complete overthrow of the one or of the other
party could put an end to it.
Suppres- Carthage was indebted for its deliverance out of all
mutiny. this trouble to Hamilcar Barcas. Inspired by his per-
sonal quaUties and the renown of his name, a Numidian
chief called Naravas, with some thousands of horse-
men, went over to his side. The enemy was beaten
many times, thousands of prisoners were thrown under
the elephants and trodden to death; and their leaders,
Spendius and Autaritus, were nailed to the cross. Al-
though the war was not uniformly successful ; although
Hippo, and even Utica, the oldest and most faithful
ally of Carthage, revolted ; although a fleet with pro-
visions was destroyed by a storm, while on the way from
the coast of the Emporisd to Carthage; although, in
consequence of a dispnte l)etween Hamilcar and Hanno
the second in command, the enemies recovered them-
selves, and in a sally from Tunes defeated Hannibal, a
lieutenant of Hamilcar, took him prisoner, and naUed
him to the same cross on which Spendius had ended his
Ufe ; yet the whole rebellion gradually collapsed, and after a
reconciliation had taken place between Hamilcar and
Hanno at the instance of the senate, Carthage soon
{^ined the ascendancy, and stifled all further revolt in the
blood of the mutineers. The Libyan towns submitted
again, and Carthage was perhaps wise enough' not to
punish the misguided masses for the crimes of the ring-
leaders. Even Hippo and Utica, which had marked their
revolt by the massacre of the Carthaginian garrison, seem
to have received mild conditions. Carthage was once
again ruler in Africa.
Conduct of The conduct of the Bomans in this war is one of the
* It became, in the terms of Polybiua (i. 65, § 6), a 96Xtfios &tfiror8os.
* Polybiua does not state how the revolted towns were treated.
THE WAB OF THE MERCENAETES. 119
greatest stains on their history. The conditions of peace CHAP,
which had terminated the Sicilian war had not been > — ' — -
241-238
B.C.
the
equal to their expectations. They had tried to get more
out of the Carthaginians, but were obliged to content them-
selves with raising the contribution of war by 1,000 talents. Romans.
There was now an opportunity of repairing their neglect,
and Borne was not slow in making use of this opportunity.
The Eoman senate seems to have thought it unnecessary
to interfere and to take part in the war of the mercenaries.
It was enough to assist the rebels with the requisites of war.
This was done by mercantile adventurers. Perhaps the
Boman officials, even if they had wished it, would have
found it difficult to prevent the sailing of ships which had
provisions on board for the enemies of Carthage. But
what view the senate took of such private speculations we
shall soon see. A great number of blockade-runners ^
were captured by the Carthaginians. Bome had no plea
or justification for interceding on behalf of these people.
Nevertheless she did so, and there was nothing lefb for
Carthage to do in her difficulty but to set the prisoners free.
In acknowledgment of this the Boman senate gave up
all the Carthaginian prisoners who were still in Italy,*
and allowed its subjects in future to send the necessaries
of war only to the Carthaginians, not to their enemies — a
concession which one would suppose was a matter of course.
It was expected that if Carthage had opposed the de-
mands of Bome for the release of the blockade-breakers,
the Bomans would at once have declared war. Carthage
yielded, and the Bomans were thus debarred from fol-
lowing up their hostile policy ; they were even obliged to
permit their friend and ally King Hiero of Syracuse to
come forward of his own accord to the assistance of the
Carthaginians. This wise statesman * saw plainly that the
Carthaginians, after their expulsion from Sicily, were no
longer his natural enemies — that they were on the contrary
> PolybioB, i. 83, % 7* states that there were 500.
» Polybius, i. 88, % 8.
' Polybius, i. 83, § 3 : irdbv ^poviftms kcU rovyfX^i Kayi(j&iit»Qt,
120
ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK
IV.
Revolt of
the Car-
thaginian
mercen-
aries in
Sardinia.
able to render him the most valuable services by keeping
in check to some extent the excessive power of Eome. He
therefore supported them with necessaries at a time when
the mutineers blockaded Carthage by land and all sup-
plies were cut off. Perhaps he also sent troops or allowed
the Carthaginians to enlist mercenaries in his kingdom,'
and his aid doubtless contributed materially to .the final
overthrow of the rebels.
But while the insurrection was still raging in Africa,
the Carthaginian mercenaries in Sardinia had imitated
the example of their comrades, had murdered their officers,
and had taken possession of the island. Unable to keep
their position among the natives, they sought aid from
Bome. At first, as it is said, the Bomans resisted this
temptation ; they disdained to unite themselves with the
mutinous troops, and to make use of the momentary dis-
tress of Carthage for violating the conditions of peace
which they had just sworn to observe. But when Car-
thage came out victorious from the doubtful struggle, the
old jealousy of the Bomans revived, and they decided to
take the mutinous mercenaries of Sardinia under their
protection. Boman politicians justified themselves pro-
bably with the sophistry that Sardinia no longer belonged
to Carthage, since Carthaginian authority in the island
had come to an end, and there was no longer a Carthaginian
garrison in it. War therefore was not carried on against
Carthage, when the island was taken, but against the
Sardinian natives, who were now an independent nation.
But Carthage protested against this view of the case, and
made preparations for the reduction of the revolted island.
The Bomans now openly declared their intentions. They
interpreted the Carthaginian armaments as a menace of
' This is probably the extent of the concession reported by Appian, v. 3 : iral
^troKoylay iK t^j *lra\la5 h fi6yotf r6p9€ rhv wSKtfjLoy Mrp^t^v. — Appian, Tiii. 6.
No more than this is implied by Zonaras, yiii. 17 : koI fAioBoipopovi in r^t
olKtias ffvfifMxi^os abrois hroryayiirOcu hcirpe^ay. The Romans could never
have allowed any foreign power, least of all the Carthaginians, to raise troops
in their own immediate dominions in Italy, and this was expressly stipulated
in the treaty of peace. — ^Folybius, iii. 27, i^; Appian, viii. 6.
241-238
Interfep-
THE WAB OF THE MERCENARIES. 121
war and complained of the intermption of Italian com- CHAP,
merce by Carthaginian cmisers.
These complaints probably show that smuggling and
the blockade-mnning of Italian traders had not been
discontinned, in spite of the promise of Borne. ^ For Car- ence of the
thage there was left no choice, but either to engage in a ^^f^^^^
war with Bome, or to agree to such conditions as Bome,
in contempt of aU justice and relying on her superior
power, thought fit to propose. Carthage was too much
exhausted to take the former alternative. She was obliged
to purchase peace by resigning Sardinia, and by the pay-
ment of twelve hundred talents. Thus did the Bomans of
the old time show, as Sallust remarks in tones of praise,
* that they understood how to restrain their passions, and
listened to the demands of right and justice ; that especi-
ally in the Punic wars, in spite of the repeated treachery of
the Carthaginians, they never allowed themselves to act in
a similar way, and were alone guided in their actions by
a sense of what was worthy of them.' *
The revolting treatment of her humbled rival was an Surrender
evil seed destined to spring up soon in a luxuriant crop, ^ ^^ ^*
and to bear as its fatal fruit the devastation of Italy in the Romans.
Hannibalian war. The bitterness of soul with which the
noble Hamilcar submitted indignantly to unjustifiable
wrong explains the inextinguishable hatred of Bome
which he cherished as long as he lived, and bequeathed as
a sacred trust to his great son Hannibal.^ For the present
' According to Appian (yiii. 6)i the Carthaginians took Roman merchant
vessels and drowned the crews to escape detection. If there is any truth in
this statement, the merchant vessels so treated must have carried supplies to
the rebels or attempted to run the blockade. But in their present helpless
condition, the Carthaginians, unless they were demented, could not have
committed acta so foolish and so calculated to give the Bomans provocation
for war.
« Sallust, CaiU., 61. Very different is the opinion of Poly bins (iii. 28),
who says that f< r the proceedings of the Komans, oirr§ wpd^aaiy oth^ cdrlcv
§tipot Tit tty tHKoyoy &AA* 6f»a\oyovfi4yus rohs Kapxn^oylovs iiyayKoafUyovs xapii
irdyra rk Bixaia iik rhy Kcuphy iKx^fffjcat yi^w lapZ6yo5f i^weyKuy ih rh
vpo€i(nifi4yop v\ri$os r&y xpfUfAdmy,
* Compare Folybios, iii. 9, § 6; and 10, {{ 4, 5.
122 ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK might trinmplied over right. The island of Sardiaia
• — ,-1—^ became a Roman province. But it was a long time before
the wild inhabitants of the mountains were subdued and
in some measure became accustomed to an orderly govern-
ment. For many years Sardinia was the scene of the most
savage wars^ and the most temble civil strife, in which
the descendants of the Boman nobility obtained inglorious
triumphs, and slaves for their ever-increasing estates. The
neighbouring island of Corsica had never been permanently
in the possession of the Carthaginians. The Bomans now
established themselves there, and united it to the province
of Sardinia. But here, as in Sardinia, the natives with-
drew into the impenetrable mountains of the interior,
beyond the rea^h of Roman dominion, and resisted Roman
customs and political order. The resources of the two
islands remained undeveloped. It was only in the small
coast towns and near the sea that the original barbarism
gave way to civilisation and the dominion of Boman law.
The interior remained barbarous ; and among the many
islands of the Mediterranean, Sardinia and Corsica alone,
up to almost the present time, have never been the seats
of political order and prosperity.
* Even bloodhoundB were employed to host down the nativoB. — Zonaras,
viii. 18.
THE WAB WITH THE GAULS. 123
225-222
B.C.
CHAPTER V.
THE WAB WITH THE GAULS, 226-222 B.C.
The twenty-four jeaxs of war with the great power of CHAP.
Carthage were followed by a six days' war with Falerii, if
the collision between the colossal power of Borne and the
pnny town of Falerii can really be termed a war. How it
happened that the Faliscans provoked the Romans, how tion of
they could venture to think of opposition, we cannot ^*^«"*-
understand. The town, which, even at the time of Camillus,
was constrained to submit to the superior strength of Rome,
was without difficulty taken and destroyed. The Roman
consuls were not ashamed to make this event the subject
of a triumph, which is chronicled in the Roman Fasti by
the side of the triumphs of Catulus and the Scipios.
Putting aside this incident, the period between the first Gallic and
and the second Punic wars (from 241 till 218 B.C.) was ^^^"^
occupied with wars of a more serious character — one in Italy
with the Gauls, and two on the opposite side of the
Adriatic with the Illyrians. In the order of time the first
Ulyrian war preceded the war with the Gauls ; but for the
sake of greater clearness we will follow in our narrative a
geographical rather than a chronological order, and speak
first of the war waged in Italy against the Gauls, and then
of the two Ulyrian wars conjointly.
After the defeat of the Senonian Gauls in the year 283 Causes for
B.O., and after the establishment of the colony of Sena in luaction of
their desolated territory, the Gallic races in Northern the Gauls
Italy remained quiet for forty-five years. This long pause, ^*
which was most advantageous to the Romans during the
wars with Pyrrhus and the Carthaginians, may in part be
124 ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK ascribed to the impression made among the Ganls by the
>. — rl — ' defeat on the Yadimonian Lake and by the destruction of
the Senonians.^ It seems, however, that besides the ex-
haustion of the Ganls and their fear, another circumstance
contributed to keep them thus long quiet ; and this was
probably the fact that during that long period they found
occupation as mercenaries in the Carthaginian armies.
The ending of the war in Sicily, while it stopped the
employment of Gallic adventurers, was, therefore, a cause
of renewed attacks on Italy. Bome accordingly could not
fail soon to meet on another battle-field those Gallic
warriors whom she had so long encountered in Sicily.
^^® P?®^ The greater part of Italy, north of the chain of the
Gallic Apennines, at that time justly called Cisalpine Gktul, had
^^' been for a course of years in the possession of several Gallic
tribes. In the modern district of Emilia were the Boians,
the neighbours and allies of the conquered Senonians, and
the smaller tribes of the Lingonians and Anarians ; north
of the Po, in the country about Milan, dwelt the great
people of the Insubrians, while to the east of these on the
Mincio and the Adige lay the Cenomanians ; but these tribes,
little inclined, seemingly, to make common cause with
their countrvmen, remained neutral in all the hostilities
against Eome. Besides these Gallic races, there were in
the north of Italy two totally different nations : in the east
and about the Adriatic Sea, the Veneti, while in the west,
where the Alps and the Apennines join, the Ligurians
were scattered about on both sides of the Apennines
almost as far as the valley of the Arno, and towards the
north in Piedmont along the upper course of the Po and
its tributary streams.
Attack on Four years before the outbreak of the war with Carthage
of^iiSm?-^ (268 B.C.) the Romans founded the colony Ariminum
num. (Rimini), on the Adriatic Sea, as the most northern bul-
wark of the Italy of that time. This town was exposed
to the first attacks of the enemy whom it was intended
< Folybios, il. 21, f 2.
THE WAE WITH THE GAULS. 125
to control. In the year 238 (in the third year, therefore, CHAP,
after the conclusion of peace with Carthage), a Gallic > _ /
army, which we are told had been called by the chiefs 225-222
B.C.
of the Boians from Transalpine Gaul, encamped before
Ariminum. However, before hostilities began, a dis-
pute arose between the Boians and their troublesome and
unwelcome guests, whose rapacity, it may be presumed,
made but little distinction between friends and foes.
The Boian chiefs were murdered by their own people,
the strangers were attacked, conquered in open war, and
compelled to return to their homes.
Thus, for this time, the danger passed away.' Still, the Proposed
attention of the Romans had been drawn to their north- of the
east boundary, where new means of defence against their ^^^^7-
unruly neighbours seemed necessary. The colonists of
Ariminum were clearly unable by themselves to resist the
Gauls. Nothing was more suited to the needs of the case
than an increase of the Boman population in those partes.
This could easily be effected, and was desirable also on
many other accounts. The whole country of the Seno-
nians round about Ariminum, and south in Picenum, was
depopulated and laid waste since the war of extirpation of
288, and was probably left for the use of the large Soman
families only as pasture land. A better opportunity
could not present itself for rewarding Boman veterans for
their military service, for making impoverished peasants
landowners of small estates, for peopling again a country
which had become desolate, for bringing together on the
endangered frontier a warlike and faithful population,
and by the extension of the Latin race and the Latin
tongue to Romanise the land conquered by force of arms.
The only thing which was opposed to so wholesome a
measure was the private interest of the Boman nobles
who had taken possession of and used the land in
' At least according to the report of PolybioB, ii. 21. Other writers related
serious battles with the Gatds and their allies the Ligurians (Zonaras, riii. 18 ;
Orositts, iy. 12), in one of which 14,000 Gaols were killed and 2,000 taken by
P. Valerius Falto, consul of the year 238, and brother of the praetor Q. Valerius
Falto. See p. 106. Can this be an extract from the Valerian family chronicle?
126 ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK question as if it were their own. They had no legal right
IV.
. to the land. They were only possessors on sufferance
until the state should think fit to make a different arrange-
ment. They could lay no claim even to compensation if
the land should be taken from them. But this tsCct only
added virulence to the opposition with which the Roman
nobility resisted any measure for dividing the state lands in
the interests of the whole community rather than their
own.
Agrarian We have unfortunately only very imperfect accounts of
CaiuB tl^6 disputes which arose in Bome between the nobles and
Flaminius. the popular party relating to the allotment of the land
in Picenum. Even Polybius gives us no help here, and
appears to have judged the measures from a narrow and
aristocratic point of view. The champion of the popular
party and of the public interest was the tribune C.
Flaminius. In spite of all opposition on the part of the
senate, he obtained the sanction of the people for his
proposal (232 b.c.).^ The nobility, blind and obstinate m
their selfishness, carried their opposition to the utmost
limits, and thus forced their opponents to take their stand
on the formal constitutional law, to set aside the usual
practice, and to cause the agrarian law to be passed by a
vote of the assembly of tribes, without a previous reso-
lution or the subsequent approbation of the senate. It
was very much to be regretted that the co-operation of
the senate was set aside, and that the popular leaders
were enabled to become conscious of their power. But
the senate could only attribute the loss of its influence to
itself. It had taken up a position which it could not
maintain, and hazarded the strength of its moral weight,
which, till now, had been unimpaired ; although, legally,
since the Hortensian law in 287 B.C., a resolution of the
tribes needed no confirmation from the senate. It is
therefore not without a good reason that from the
acceptance of the agrarian law of Flaminius by the
^ Polybius, ii. 21. Cicero {De Senect 4) difiezs from Polybius in placing
the law four years later.
THE WAR WITH THE GAULS. 127
assembly of tribes against the opposition of the senate CHAP.
Poljbius dates a change for the worse in the Eoman ^ ^'
constitution.^ 220-222
B.C.
If the nobles were not able to prevent the useful
measure of Plaminius, they knew at least how to avenge the patri-
themselves. The hatred of his enemies pursued him to S?"^**^
* xlazninius.
his death on the bloody battle-field of Thrasymenus ; nay,
it even survived him, and endeavoured, by venomous and
false representations in the Boman annals, to blacken the
name of the popular leader.'
The agrarian law of Flaminius did not remain a dead The great
letter, but was fully carried out. The country along the piamhiius.
Adriatic Sea, through which formerly the barbarous
Senonians had roamed, was filled with Soman settlers.'
This extreme outpost of Boman civilisation was connected
with the centre of the empire by the Flaminian road (Via
Flaminia), which crossed the Apennines in TJmbria, and
owed its name as well as its origin to the founder of the
settlement in the land of the Senonians. It was the second
great highway through Italy, connecting Bome with the
eastern coast, its terminus being at Ariminum on the
Adriatic, as that of the Appian way was Brundusium.
These two roads opened the mountainous interior of
the country to commerce, and united the seas on the
east and on the west.
Before these works could be completed, the neighbour- Move-
ing Gauls showed great uneasiness about the further ^oMthe
advance of the Bomans.^ The extension of civilisation is f^^ic
always an attack on surrounding barbarism ; and as it was
at that time in Italy, so is it now at the present day in
North America. The Boians looked forward to the time
when their country, like that of the Senonians, would
be seized by Boman settlers; they saw that they
were doomed to extermination, and they determined to
> PolybiuB, ii. 21. • PolybiuB, ii. 81 ff.
' Unfortunately we have receired no information regarding the number of
the settlers, and the extent of the portions of land allotted to them.
• Polybius, ii. 21, §§ 8, 9.
tribes.
128
ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK
IV.
Feare of
the Ro-
mans.
try and avert the threatened danger by an attack on
Borne. They organised a military alliance of all the.
various Cisalpine Gallic tribes with the single exception of
the Cenomanians, and they drew swarms of adventurers
across the Alps by the prospect of rich spoils. The latter,
called Gsesatians, were not a peculiar Gallic tribe,^ but
volunteers from all parts of the country, such as for many
years had been accustomed to enter into foreign, and
mostly into the Carthaginian, service. They united to-
gether to form voluntary companies under separate leaders,
a custom which prevailed for centuries among the Gauls
and their neighbours the Germans.
The bringing together of these forces, with the mani-
fest preparations for a war with Bome, roused again,
not in Rome alone, but in the whole of Italy, that fear of
the Gauls which had never quite disappeared since the
battle on the Allia. The Romans had certainly overcome
their rude enemies in many engagements, but not without
having suflFered many reverses on their own part. The brave
Roman soldiers trembled at the thought of the Gauls, and
shook with terror at the sight of the huge, half-naked,
defiant forms. Their minds were alarmed by supernatural
appearances of all kinds. A three-fold moon, or a sudden
bright light in the midnight sky, flowing blood, and
similar threatening signs were reported on all sides, and
seemed to show that the gods were exasperated and must
be solemnly appeased.* Superstition is always apt to do
violence to human feelings; and although the Romans
had long since given up ascribing to their deities a Satanic
thirst for human blood,* fear so troubled their thoughts
that, to avert the impending evil, human beings were sacri-
ficed on the public market in Rome.^ A male and a
m
" Plutarch, Marcdl, 3.
< Zonaras (viii. 20) and Plutarch (MarcelL 4) place these 'prodigia' in
the year 223 b.c.
• They were, according to Plutarch (Mareell., 8), irpifus UtoKtifityoi Tphs
T& 9c7a.
* The Forum Boariuxn, OrosiuB, it. 18. Plutarch, MarceU, 3.
THE WAH WITH THE GAULS. 129
female Gaul, and a male an^ a female Greek, wQre buried CHAP,
alive, in order that thus, without injury to the Boman ^ , , _-
people, a prophecy might be fulfilled which promised the 226-222
possession of Boman soil to the Gauls and Greeks*^
At length, iji the year 225, the storm burst* An army oi March of
Gauls, consisting of 50,000 fcot, and 20,000 mounted on ^^^ ^*^*-
horses or war chariots, marched towards the south. The
(Consul L. iSmilius Papus cominaoded ^> consular army of
two legions and the proportionate number of allies — from
^/IfiOO to 23,000 men in all — and was posted in Arimjgaum,
from which side the attack wa^ e^xpected* A res^ry^
corps of 50,000 TJmbrians and Sabines^ with 4»000 horse,
was destined to protect Etruria under a pmtor, and w.a9
probably stationed in the north-eastern part, somewhere in
the neighbourhood of Arretium or Fsesulee. The second
consul, Atilius Begulus, was engaged in Sardinia in the
int^minable petty wars with the natives. On the i^fcelli-
gence of the advance of the GqiuIs, he was, it appears,
immediately recalled ; a^d th^ rapid and glorious is^ue of
the campaign ^ay pnbgicipaUy be attributed to his timely
appearance on the scene of action.
The Gauls deceived all the calculations of the Boman Betreat of
generals. They took neither the road through Picenum, ^ ^*^®
nor the road through north-eastern Etruria by Fsesulse, ciusium,
but, marching close to the western coast, had arrived already ^^ ^^-^^^
in the neighbourhood of Clusium, only three days' mpjrch mon.
from Some, bef<»e the Bomans really knew where they
were. When the preetor followed them with the reserve
corps^ they turned suddenly round, enticed their enemy
into an ambuEdi, and completely defeated theuu^ Six
1 ZoDazas, viii. 19. Aceovding to Platarch (MarwU, 3), this piophecy was
eontaiiwd in the SibyllixiA books. It is more probable that it vas found in thjQ
' libri fatales ' of Etruscan origin. The Etruscans were from old the enemies
of the Gauls and the Greeks. The genuine Sibylline books/ which weria
Greek, would not haye demanded the immoUtion of Greeks. But the con-
fusion between the native or Etruscan prophecies and those of the so-called
Sibylline books was general in Bome. — See vol. i. p. 80.
' This defeat must havp taken place in the neighbonrhood of Clusium.
Polybius (.IL 25) does not name the place. He merely says that the Gauls
marched from Clusium in the direction of Fsesulse {its M it6\uf ^uff6\M^),
VOL. n, K
130 ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK thousand men were cut down. The remainder took refuffe
IV • .
/ ._- in a strong position on a hill, where they were surrounded
by the Gauls, and would have been compelled to surrender
if the consul ^milius had not, in the meantime, come to
their assistance from Picenum. The Gauls, heavily laden
with spoil, and encumbered by the task of watching
thousands of prisoners, gave up the idea of a further
advance towards Rome. They endeavoured also to avoid
meeting with the consulai' army. Their object was, first,
to place their spoils in safety, to collect new forces, and
then to renew the profitable raid. They marched, there-
fore, northwards * along the coast on the same road by
which they had come. The Eoman army followed close
upon their heels, but ventured on no serious attack. By
a happy coincidence, the consul C. Atilius Begulus, who
had brought back his legions from Sardinia, and had
landed in Pisa,^ marched southwards on the same road
which the Guuls were following on their retreat north-
wards. Thus it happened that the enemies found them-
selves in the midst of the two Roman armies in the
neighbourhood of Telamon. It was now no longer
possible for them to evade a battle. They prepared to
encounter both Roman armies at once. One front they
whereupon they were followed and overtaken by the Romans, who defeated them.
As Fsesulse lies in the neighbourhood of one of the well-known passes over
the Apennines, the expression ' in the direction of Fsesulse ' is appropriate even
if Fsesulse was still a long way off. The Gauls broke up in the night and marched
probably round the Roman army, which had followed them from north to
Routh. Their cavalry did not start till the following morning, and was
intended to draw the Romans after them. It is not at all probable that (as
Rospatt surmises in Feldzuge des Hannibal^ p. 115), Polybius confounded
Fsesulae with Clunium.
* But they did not follow the straight road. When they were met by the
two Roman armies they were at Telamon, to the south-west of Clusium.
How they got there we do not know. Perhaps they were driven back so far
by the consul Atilius, whom they met on their northward march ; perhaps
they were induced by the prospect of more plunder to move in that direction.
■ The consul's return from Sardinia was probably not fortuitous, but ordered
by the senate. Moreover, the consul, in landing so far north as Pisa, may
have intended to block up the neighbouring passes over the Apennines, and to
act in co-operation with the other Roman armies, which he expected to find
'there.
THE WAR WITH THE GAUI^. 131
directed northwards against the army of Begulus, the CHAP,
other southwards towards ^milius. Thus they stood ..., / ,.
back to back, each flank covered by a barricade, the 226-222
carnages, baggage, booty, and prisoners being separated
from the combatants, and strongly guarded on a hill. In
the front, which faced ^Shnilius, the place of honour was
taken by the Transalpine Gsesatians, in comparison with
whose ferocious bearing the appearance of the Grauls who
were settled in Italy had a colouring of polish and civili-
sation. The Insubrians and Boians wore coats and
trowsers. The Gaesatians, on the other hand, cast aside all
dress as an encumbrance and fought naked, retaining only
their ornaments. Heavy collars and bracelets made of
twisted gold wire distinguished the most valiant warriors,
who stood in the foremost ranks challenging their foes to
the fight. They presented a strange sight to the Eoman
soldiers, and by their savage manners and gestures, by
their insu£Scient arms for offence and defence, and by the
richness of their ornaments, inspired awe, confidence, and
cupidiiy at the same time. At the beginning of the
battle the hosts of Gauls uttered a tremendous war cry,
mingled with the sound of horns and trumpets. A mo-
mentous hour had arrived, which might well fill the breast
of many a brave Soman with not unmanly anxiety. A
victory for the enemy would renew terrors that followed
the day of the Allia, a day which was registered in the
Roman calendar as a never-to-be-forgotten day of
mourning.
The first encounter was between the horse. The consul Annihiia-
Begulus led the Roman cavalry in person, but fell at the q^^-° ®
very onset, and his head was a fit trophy, though fortu- army-
nately the only one, which the barbarians could boast of.
Their horse drew back, and the fight between the infantry
began. The superiority of Roman discipline and of
Roman arms became immediately apparent. The shields
of the Gauls were too small to protect them from the
missiles with which the Romans assailed them from a safe
distance. Their only weapon for attack was a sword,
K 2
132
KOMAN HISTOBY.
BOOK
IV,
Devasta-
tion of the
Boinn
territory
by the
consul
^miliui.
suitable for a blow but not for a stab, and of snob bad
steel tbat it bent at the first blow. Driven to despair they
rashed madly against the Roman ranks, as if seeking a
voluntary death, or cast themselves in wild flight on their
hindmost ranks, thus throwing them into' confusion.
The legions now closed in on both sides, pressing the army
of the Gkuls nearer and nearer together, and then cut
them down almost to the last num. Forty thousand were
killed ; ten thousand were taken prisoners ; only the horse-
men escaped. Of the two kings of the Gauls, Ooncolitanus
fell alive into the hands of ilie conquerors ; the other,
Aneroestus, fell by his own hand. The whole of the booty,
the herds of cattle, the prisoners which the Qauls had
dragged with them, all came into the possession of the
victors, who, as far as it was possible, restored the booty
to the plundered.*
After this glorious victory ^milius invaded the country
of the Boians, and marched through it, plundering and
laying it waste in all directions. Then he led his troops
to Borne laden with rich booly, and ascended in a well-
deserved triumph the Capitol, to offer due thanks to the
gods for their deliverance of Bome. This triumphal pro-
cession was made memorable by the captured arms,*
military ensigns, and golden chains of the Oauls, but above
ail by the line of captive chiefii who preceded the victor
arrayed in complete armour. They had taken an oath
not to lay down their arms till they had ascended the
Capitol. This oath was now fulfilled amid the derisive
shouts of the Beman people.'
* The description which Folybins (ii. 28-81) gives of this battle has quite
the stamp of truth. Zonanis (yiii. SO) relates tbat JEtegaltiB was not only
killed, bnt also defeated before the ekaet battle was fought This seems an
error, arising from the preceding deiaai of the Boman reserve annj, wkiefa he
confounded with that of Begulus.
* These arms were partly hung up in Boman temples, partly giren to Hiero
of Syracuse, as his irham of the spoils. After the «uider of Hieraoymus, the
grandson of Hiero, the people of Syracuse armed themselTes with thesa
Gallic weapons. — Livy, xziy. 21. It is on this occasion that we hear in-
cidentaUy of the part which Hiero had in repelling the Gallic invasion.
■ Zonaras, viii. 20.
of Tela-
mon.
THE WAK WITH THE GAXTLS. 183
The victory at Telamon was one of the most important CHAP.
which the Bomans had thns &r gained. It put an end ._ / «
to the fiercest of all the attacks of the (Jauls,* and restored ^^t'^^^
to the Boman soldiers that confidence in their own ^ ,^ ^
BesuiU of
strength which they had almost lost when they faced these the battlo
barharons enemies. The ultimate results' of this victory
we can appreciate only when we bear in mind that but
seven years later Hannibal with his Funic army stood in
Cisalpine Gaid to organise the whole of the Grallic race
for a war of extermination against Rome. With how
much more brilliant success would this great general
have borne down the Boman armies if the strength and
courage of the Gauls had not first been broken I Apart
from its influence on the progress of events, the battle
of Telamon has for us an especial and peculiar interest,
because we discern in the description of Folybius the
impressions of an eye-witness and a combatant, who
was no other than the venerable Fabius Fictor, the oldest
Boman historian.' The entire Boman forces, both the
consular armies and the reserve army, were engaged in
the battle of Telamon. We may therefore safely conclude
that Fabius, who served in this war, was present, and that
the impression which the Gh.llic warriors made on the
Bomans was drawn in so g^phic a manner because he
himself received it on the spot.
After the victory at Telamon, the Bomans resolved to
' Pol^bins, ii. 31, §7:4 f^*^ ^^^ fiapurdrii r&v KtXrw f^o8or otirus Ktd
roir^ rfrp^w^ 9tul»$dpri' Tatriiji^p 'IreAiiirair, fiiKurra 8) *P«/Aaro<i, fiiyay Ka\
pofitphw 4vucp§fiiaaira kMvvow,
' That Folybius (ii. 28, § 11, and 29, J 2) had before him the report of a
man who had retUIy taken part in the battle, we eee from the lively description
of the engagement, but still more clearly from the words with which he
refers to the personal impreeeions and of^nions of an eye-witness. He says,
' When the combatants were near each other, it was a strange and wonderful
sight for those who were present at the moment, and it remained in the
imagination of those who heard the narrative afterwards.* He continues,
' Even now one may well doabt not less than the combatants did themseWes
whether the battle array of the Gaols was safe or unsafe for them.' This
doubt of a combatant at the time can only have been expressed in the work
of Fabins. We know thus much, that Fabius served in that war with the
Gauls.
134 EOMAN HISTORY.
BOOK prevent any further invasions of the Gauls by the con-
^.^ — r^ — ' quest of the whole region of the Po valley. In the year
SubjTiea- immediately following the Boians were without any diffi-
tion of the culty reduced to complete subjection. In the next year
brians. (^^^ B.C.) the consuls crossed the Po, and attacked the
most powerful Cisalpine people, the Insubrians, in their
own country. One of these two consuls was C. Flaminius,
the recognised leader of the popular party, who as tribune
had effected the allotment of the territory of Picenum to
Itoman settlers, and who was now raised to the consulship
and intrusted with the conduct of the war, to the great
vexation of the nobility. Although he was not wanting in
courage and ability, it appears that he wa« greater as a
statesman than as a general. His first military under-
takings were failures. In crossing the Po he suffered
a defeat, and when he had, either by an armistice or by
the offer of peace, extricated himself from his difficulty, he
was obliged to seek refuge in the country of the Ceno-
manians. But from this region he very soon advanced
again to the attack. The Insubrians, seeing that peace
and friendship with Rome were an impossibility, sum-
moned together all the fighting men of their country, and
marched towards the enemy with an army of 50,000
warriors. Acquainted as they were with the peculiarities
of the country, they had a great advantage over the Ro-
mans, to whom Cisalpine Gaul at that time was as un-
known as Germany was to the legions at the time of
Tiberius. Flaminius soon found himself in a very critical
position. In his Gallic allies he had no ^confidence, and
he separated himself from them by breaking down the
bridges across a river which flowed between his army and
their auxiliary force. In front of this river, which in case
of defeat shut off all hopes of retreat, he was compelled to
accept a battle ; but the bravery of the Roman soldiers
made good the faults of the general. Obliged to conquer
or to perish, they gained a signal victory, and with this
victory the war was practically at an end. The obsti-
nate Insubrians, it is true, still refused to submit to the
B.C.
THE WAR WITH THE GAULS. 135
authority of Rome. They made one last eflEbrt, with the
help of 30,000 mercenaries from Transalpine Gaul, But
in the following year their capital, Mediolanum, was taken, ^^^^^^
and their subjection thus completed. Rome was now the
mistress of the whole country from the Apennines to the
Alps, and two new colonies, Placentia and Cremona, were
destined permanently to secure the newly-conquered lands.
The Cenomanians retained their nominal freedom and the
friendship of the Roman people. The Veneti did the same.
The Ligurians, with whom the Romans had since 238
almost year after year carried on petty warfare, remained,
at least on their mountains, unconquered.* But whatever
measure of independence these tribes might still retain, it
was certain that they could not retain it long. The thinly
peopled country, once subdued by the Roman sword, was
in the act of being made the seat of order and civilisation
by the Roman plough when the war with Hannibal sud-
denly broke out, and threw back for many years the
development of Northern Italy.
' liyy, Epit. 20 ; Eatropius, iii. 2; Zonaras, yiii. 18, 19.
186 EOMAN HlSTOltY.
CHAPTER VI.
TfiE FIBSl* ILLTBIAK WAlb, 229-228 H^O*
BOOK After the Boman dominion had penetrated as far as the
_ .' - Adriatic Sea, aild was there fortified by the foundation of
Roman ^^ colonies of Hatria, Gastrum Novnm, Pirmum, Sena,
colonies on anc[ Ariminum, to which was added before the end of the
the
Adriatic. Sicilian war (244 B.C.) the important town of Bnindnsinm,
Borne came for the first time into immediate contact with
the countries and the peoples of the opposite coast.
The war with Pyrrhus would no doubt have led to
the immediate interference of the Bomans in the politics
of Greece, if Carthage had not for many years engrossed
their attention. After the victorious conclusion of the
war in Sicily, it was to be expected that Bome would seek
to exercise in the East the influence which her recent
accession of power had given her.
The But the weight of her arm was to fall in the first in-
fiiyiiCTim. staJ^ce, not ou the Greeks proper, nor even on half Greeks
like the Epirots of Pyrrhus, but on the Illyrian pirates, the
primeval inhabitants of the mountainous coast lands on
the Adriatic Sea, which seem destined by nature to be
the seat of inextinguishable barbarism. The lUyrians of
that time, like their present successors on the mountains
of Dalmatia and Montenegro, were peculiarly fitted for a
life of robbery. The much indented coast, with its nume-
rous islands and headlands, surrounded by steep and
wild mountains, was highly favourable for piratical enter-
prise. As long, however, as the Greek colonies in the
Ionian Sea, especially Corcyra and Epidamnus, flourished,
the Illyrian pirates had not ventured far out of their
B.C.
THE FIRST ILLYRIAN WAR. 137
retreats ; at least theyhacl not ventured into Greek waters CHAP.
in large nnmbers and with open violence. It was only - . -
when the Greek states had become so weakened by ever- 229-228
lasting wars and revolutions as to be scarcely able to pro-
tect themselves, that the piracy of the lUyrians assumed
larger proportions. They acted now like the Scandinavian
sea-kings of the middle ages. With their small, quick*
sailing Libumian ships, they intercepted not only the
merchant vessels which traded in those seas, but, sailing
in fleets, sometimes of a hundred ships, along the coast
of the Adriatic and Ionian Seas as far as Messenia in
Peloponnesus, landed where they pleased, took possession
of towns and villages, carried away spoils and prisoners,
and before it was possible to bring any force against them
they were on board again and gone. These piratical ex-
peditions gradually assumed the character of regular wars.
Thus a band of Ulyrians attacked the flourishing Epirotic
town Phoenice, which had a garrison of eight hundred Gallic
mercenaries,' made common cause with the Gauls, sacked
the town, fought a regular battle with the people of the
country who rushed to the defence of their city, and at
length returned unhurt to their own land with all the
spoils. No wonder that Epirus and Acamania found it
advisable to come to an understanding with the Ulyrians
by which they secured for themselves the protection of
the robber state. The Ulyrians now extended their raids
> Polybins (ii. 7) gives a detailed and interestiDg aceovmt of this band, from
which we can form an opinion of the adventures and the character of the
Gallic mercenaries of the time. They had been expelled ^m their own
country on account of their treachery, and 3,000 of them had taken service
under the Carthaginians in Sicily. Quarrelling with their employers about the
amount of pay, they formed the plan of plundering the town of Agrigentum,
of which they formed the garrison ; but this plan was discovered and pre-
rented. At a later period of the war they entered into a plot for delivering
over the town of Eryz into the hands of the Romans (see above, p. 102);
but they were foiled by the vigilance and vigour of Hamilcar Barcas. They
then deserted in a body and took service under the Bomans, who employed
them till the end of the war. But the Bomans would have nothing to do with
them after the conclusion of peace. They were disarmed and sent out of
Italy. Thereupon they crossed over to Epiros, and continued their lawless
practices in that country.
138 ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK to other parts. The towns and islands of those parts —
s- — r^ — ' Issa, Pharos, Apollonia, and Epidamnus — were in constant
terror. Epidamnus was treacherously attacked by a
number of men who had asked permission to fetch drink-
ing water for their ships, and when they were hos-
pitably admitted drew forth hidden knives, and cutting
down the guards, took possession of the gate till the re-
mainder of the band came from the ships and pressed into
the town. The inhabitants succeeded only with the
greatest difficulty in overcoming the robbers, and in driving
them back to their ships.* The CorcyrsBans were less fortu-
nate. The niyrians, in league with the Acamanians, fought
a regular battle with them and their countrymen the Achse-
ans, and compelled them to give over the island to them.
Corcyra seemed destined to be thrown like a ball from the
hand of one conqueror to that of another. The lUyrians
gave over the government to a Greek from the island of
Pharos, called Demetrius, who, judging by the little we
know of him, appears to have been a reckless and unprin-
cipled adventurer. By such successful undertakings the
robber state of the Illyrians gradually became a consider-
able power. Their king felt himself to be a potentate not
unlike the successors of Alexander the Great ; and indeed
he seemed fully entitled to consider himself the equal of
Pyrrhus or the king of Macedonia, who was obliged to
ask his assistance against the Achseans.^
Roman The commerce of the Italian towns had long suffered
Uiyricum. Under the scourge of the lUyrian pirates. At length the
Koman senate sent two brothers, Caius and Lucius Corun-
canius, to Scodra (Scutari), the seat of the lUyrian kings,
complaining of their doings and asking for redress. At
that time a queen called Teuta was governing in the place
of her young son Pinnes. She promised that she, as queen
of the Illyrians, would avoid all hostility against Rome in
political matters, but she declared at the same time that she
was not in a position to oppose the private undertakings
» Polybius, ii. 9. « Polybius, ii. 2.
THE FIRST rLLYRIAN WAR. 139
of her subjects. According to Ulyrian law she said that CHAP,
every man was free to carry on war with another on his own
229-228
B.C.
account. Upon this the younger Coruncanius answered
that it was customary among the Bomans for the state to
punish the transgressions of individuals. They would
take good care to make the Illyrians also observe this
custom. The queen made no answer to this ill-timed
reply, but on the return of the brothers she caused them
to be waylaid, and the younger one was killed.
War was now unavoidable. In the year 229 a fleet Successful
of two hundred ships sailed across the Adriatic Sea under campaigns
the command of the consul Cn. Fulvius Centumalus, while S, .
\ lUyncum.
a land army of 20,000 men and 2,000 horse marched to
take ship at Brundusium under the second consul, L.
Postumius Albinus. It was high time that a strong arm
should interfere. The recently completed conquest of
Corcyra had made the Illyrians so confident and daring
that they contemplated nothing less than the reduction
of all the independent Greek states of that neighbourhood.
They besieged at the same time Epidamnus and Issa, and
threatened Apollonia. But one summer campaign sufficed
to put an end to their encroachments. When the Soman
fleet appeared before Corcyra, the shrewd Demetrius saw
at once with what sort of people he had to deal. To
sacrifice himself in a hopeless contest for the Queen Teuta
was not to his mind. He delivered the island over to the
consul Fulvius, and offered his services in the prosecution
of the war against the Illyrians. The fleet now sailed
northwards under his guidance. Epidamnus and Issa
were delivered without difficulty. The legions had in the
meantime crossed from Italy. The strongholds and hiding-
places of the Illyrians fell one after another into the power
of the Romans. Now and then there was a serious struggle,
but on the whole the Soman arms were irresistible. The
Atintanians and Parthinians, two nations subjected by the
Illyrians, joined the Bomans. The Queen Teuta took
refuge in the citadel of Bhizon, where for the time she was
safe.
140 ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK In the autumn Fulvius was able to return with, the
IV
...^ ^l . greater part of the army and the fleet. His colleague
Postumius remained in Illyria with forty ships and a few
troops, formed an army out of the native people, and thus
kept the Illyrians in check during the winter. In the fol-
lowing spring (228 b.g.) the lUyrian queen gave up further
resistance and accepted the conditions of peace which Borne
prescribed. All the conquests of the Illyrians were re-
stored, and the nations which had been subjected again
became independent. The Illyrians pledged themselves
to sail no armed vessels further south than Lissus (Alessio),
and even to pay a yearly tribute. After the enemy
had been thoroughly humbled, the relations of the east
coast of the Adriatic Sea were regulated according to the
interests of Borne. Demetrius of Pharos, who had shown
himself a valuable ally, received, under Boman supremacy,
one part of Illyria and the guardianship of the youth-
ful king Pinnes. The Greek towns retained their inde-
pendence. All the peoples and towns which were freed
from the Illyrians entered into an alliance with Bome,
which, after the Boman custom, was a sort of mild subjec-
tion. It was announced to the Greeks in Hellas proper
that the Bomans had crossed the sea to release them from
their foes.* There was unbounded joy at the receipt of
this news. The Athenians determined to make the Bomans
honorary citizens and to admit them to the mysteries of
Eleusis.^ The Corinthians invited them to take part in
the Isthmian games. Perhaps the just gratitude felt by
the degenerate successors of the conquerors of Salamis
stifled their feelings of shame, and caused them to for-
get the difiTerence between the former times, when the
Greeks defied the whole power of the Persian empire, and
the present, when they suffered foreign barbarians to pro-
tect them from despicable robber hordes.
* Folybius, ii. 12. * Zonaras, viii. 19.
THE SKCOND ILLYKIAN WAK. 141
CHAPTER VII.
THE SECOND ILLTBIAN WAB, 219 B.O.
Shobtly after the settlement of affairs in Hljria, the war CHAP,
with the Gauls broke out in Italy, which occupied Borne
for a few years. The restless Demetrius of Pharos
thought this a favourable time to free himself from a Alliance of
troublesome subjection to Borne. He was already before of Pharos
this time in close friendship with Antigonus, king of ^^ ^^^'
Macedonia, who was the first of all liie Greek princes to king of
find the neighbourhood of Bome an inconyenience, and ^^^^^
to feel the duty of resisting Boman encroachments on the
Greek continent. Belying on this connexion, and hoping
that Bome would soon be engaged in a new war with
Carthage, he began to attack the Boman allies, and to
treat the conditions of peace of 228 generally with
contempt. He sailed with fifty ships so far even as
the ^gean Sea, plundering and laying waste the
islands. Bome could not tolerate these acts, if she
cared to retain the gratitude or respect of the Greeks.
Nor was it the dignity of Bome alone, but her interests
also, which demanded the prompt chastisement of Deme-
trius. A new war with Carthage had by this time
become inevitable. If, before its outbreak, the quarrel
with lUyria was not settled, the east coast of Italy would
be threatened, not merely by Demetrius, but also by his
friend and ally, the king of Macedonia, whose interest
peremptorily demanded a union with Hannibal and a
common war with Bome.
Under these circumstances the Bomans hastened to Capture of
settle the Ulyrian difficulty as speedily as possible, that ^^ ^^
142 ROMAN mSTOBY.
BOOK they miglit the sooner oppose Hannibal in Spain. In the
- ^^' ^ spring of the year 219 B.C. they sent the consul L,
JEmilius -^niilius PauUufl to lUyria. He discharged his duty with
Paullus. ability and success, took in a short time the fortress of
Dimalon, which had been considered impregnable, and by
combining stratagem and bravery made himself master of
the town and island of Pharos. Demetrius, flying to the
king of Macedonia, sought to prcYail on him to declare
war against Eome, and fell some years later in an attack
on the fortress of Ithome, in Peloponnesus.
Position of Thus the danger of a greater war in the East was
theGalli/ happily averted. The town of Pharos was destroyed, that
^°^ . it might no longer serve as a refuge for pirates. The
wars. former state of things was restored, and Bome, now free
from all care, could, afber the conclusion of the wars with
Gaul and Ulyria, look forward with confidence to the
struggle which Hannibal for some years paat hail pre-
pared, and which was now on the point of breaking out.
THE SECOND PUNIC WAK.
US
CILkPTER Vni.
THE SECOND PUNIC OE HANNIBALIAN WAB, 218-201 B.C.
First Period, from the beginning of the war to the battle of
CanncBy 218-216 B.C.
The treaty of peace which had put an end to the first
Punic war in 241 B.C. was the inevitable result of the
exhaustion of both the belligerent nations. It was satis-
factory to neither. After the immense efforts and sacri-
fices which Rome had made in the twenty-three years of
war, she found that the eracuation by the Carthaginians
of a few fortresses in Sicily, and the payment of a sum of
money, was a result not in accordance with the high
hopes which seemed justified after the landing of Eegulus
in Africa, and after his first brilliant and unexpected
victories. Yet the senate and the Boman people were
not able to alter the terms of peace materially. By re-
fusing to ratify the negotiations of the generals they
succeeded in extorting from the Carthaginians a few
thousand talents more, but nothing else. A further
demand might have roused the spirit of the Carthaginians
and have continued the war to an indefinite period. Ac-
cordingly, Borne contented herself with what she could get,
and what was after all a great gain. When the war of the
mercenaries broke out in Africa, she availed herself of
the distress of Carthage to extort the cession of Sardinia,
and an additional payment of 1,200 talents.
The disastrous termination of the Sicilian war could
not fail to produce a great effect on the internal affairs of the
Carthaginian republic. Unfortunately we have but a very
imperfect knowledge of the public institutions of Carthage,
CHAP.
VIU.
. , ^
First
Period,
218-216
B.C.
Besults of
the first
Punic war.
Effects of
the war on
the inter-
nal consti-
tution of
Carthage.
144
ROMAN HISTORY.
B(K)K and we can only guess wliat must have taken place on the
— ^ — ' occasion in question. But thus much seems certain, that
the war with Eome, and still more the mutiny of the
mercenaries, shook the power of the aristocracy.* A war
is, under all circumstances, a severe test for the constitu-
tion of a state. Whatever is unsound in the administra-
tion and governmeut comes to light, and an unsuccessful
war is frequently the cause of reforms, provided a people
has still vital energy enough left to discover and to apply
the remedies which it needs.* This was the case in
Carthage. In the war with the mercenaries, when the
state could only be saved by the arms of its own citizens
when the people of Carthage were obliged to fight their
own battles, they were justified in claiming for themselves
a greater share in the government. A democratic move*
ment took place, at the head of which we find Hamilcar
Barcas, the most eminent statesman and soldier that
Carthage possessed at that time. It is perfectly clear,
even from the scanty reports preserved in the extant
writers, that at the end of the Sicilian war Hq^milcar
found himself in opposition to the party which was then
in possession of the government. He ceased to be eom^
mander-in-chief. In the perils of the war with the mer-
cenaries, he again entered the service of the state. It was
he to whom Carthage owed her deliverance from a ruin
that seemed inevitable. BKs triumph in the field gave him
the ascendancy over the aristocratic party and its leader
Hanno, sumamed the Great. It appears that from this
time forward Hamilcar practically directed the government
of Carthage, somewhat ux the way in which Pericles had
> Polybius, vi. 51. The policj of the house of Barcas is called a ^iifiowria
and a irtupi/av&if rotn^pordrw MpAwmp. (Appian, vi. 6 ; Diodoros, xxv. p. 96,
TauchnitE.) Such a misrepresentation is not surprising ; it is similar to the
account of the revolution in Volsinii (see vol. 1. p. 479), which exhibits the
spite and mendacity of suristocratic historians.
■ It will not be necessary to ^ve many instances. The regeneration of
Prussia after the disustrous war with Napoleon in 1806; the abolition of
slavery in Kussia after the Crimean war ; the establishment of parliamentary
government in Austria after Sadowa, are among the most striking iilustiutions
of the historical law referred to in the te;(t.
THE SECOND PUNIC WAR. 145
governed Athens, without interfering materiallj with the CHAP,
forms of the republican constitution. His accession to
N^^
power was not unlike a change of ministry in a modem ^^^^
Prbiod, I
state. The party which had governed the state before, now 218-216
formed the Opposition ; as a matter of course, it became ^'^'
the party of peace when Hamilcar and his sons looked
upon the renewal of the war with Rome as an inevitable
necessity, and as the only chance for the preservation of
liberty and independence. It is a proof no less of the
high political qualities of the Carthaginians than of the
magnanimity of Barcas and his house, that, under such
circumstances, Carthage preserved her republican liberties,
and was not overwhelmed by a military despotism.
The mutiny of the mercenaries was scarcely suppressed. Policy of
and the revolted African subjects brought back to obe- ^^^'
dience, when Hamilcar directed his attention to a country
where he could hope to find compensation for the loss of
Sicily and Sardinia. This country was Spain, to which,
from the remotest antiquity, Phoenician traders and
settlers had been attracted, but which had hitherto
not been conquered by the Carthaginian arms, or made
subject, to any considerable extent, to Carthaginian
authority.
The island town of Gades, situated beyond the pillars Phcenician
of Hercules in the outer sea, was older perhaps than ^ennjin
Carthage herself. Its national sanctuary of the Phoe- Spain,
nician Melkarth (Hercules) vied in importance and
dignity with the temples of the mother country. The
fertile plain of Andalusia, the old land of Tartessus, was
celebrated for its wealth, and enriched at an early period
the merchants of Tyre and Sidon. The abundance of
precious metals in Spain attracted the skilful Phoenician
miners, who knew how to work the mines with profit.
No doubt Spain had been for ages of the greatest impor-
tance for the trade of Carthage ; but as long as her posses-
sions in Sicily and Sardinia absorbed her attention and
her energies, it seems that Spain was not so much the
object of the public as of the private enterprise of the
VOL. n. li
146
ROMAN mSTOEY.
BOOK
IV,
*- — . '
Hapid
growth of
Carthagi-
nian power
in Spain.
Attitnde
of the
Roman
state.
Carthaginian citizens, and that conquests in that country
were not contemplated.
This was changed now after the war with Eome. Car-
thage began to extend her power and dominion in Spain,
as Enghind did in India after the loss of the American
plantations. With an astounding rapidity she spread
her possessions from a few isolated places on the coast
oyer the southern half of the peninsula, and she appeared
destined to establish the ascendancy of the Semitic race,
and of Semitic culture, in a country where, nearly a thou-
sand years later, the Arabs, a kindred Semitic people, suc-
ceeded in gaining a footing, and in reaching a high degree
of civilisation. At the time of the Carthaginian conquest
it seemed that Spain was about to be for ever separated
politically from Europe, and to be united with North
Africa, with which it has much in common through its
geographical situation and its climate. Yet, owing to the
events which we are now about to relate, the Punic con-
quest of Spain was of short duration, and left no traces
behind except a few geographical names, like Cadiz and
Carthagena ; but the Moorish dominion, which lasted for
more than seven hundred years, has Teft a stamp on the
Spanish people which can even now be recognised, and not
least in the religious fanaticism of which it was the
principal cause.
For nine years Hamilcar worked with great success for
the realisation of his plan, and a considerable portion of
Spain was already subjected to the dominion of Carthage
when he lost his life in battle. His son-in-law, Hasdrubal,
raised to the command of the army by the voice of the
soldiers and by the approval of the people of Carthage,*
' We do not Icnow in what manner the preliminaty election of the general
by the rotes of the army waa condncted. It could not have been an illegal
usurpation of authority by the soldiers, nor'a Tiolation of discipline. Perhaps
the committee of Carthaginian senators, which, as we know, accompanied the
army, selected the most popular and able officer, conferred on him the pre-
liminary command, and reported to Carthage, to obtain the consent of the
home authorities. Some such arrangement must have bceu necessary, unless
a general was named from the first as second in command, and as successor in
case of the death of the commander-in-chief. At any rate, it ia not likely
THE SECOND PUNIC WAR. 147 '
prOTed himself a worthy successor of Hamilcar, though he CIIAP.
extended and secured the dominion of Carthage less by force ^^^^' ^
of arms than by persuasion and peaceful negotiations with ^^^
the native races. He founded New Carthage (Carthagena), 218-216
which he destined to be the capital of the new empire, as **^'
it was more favourably situated than Gades, and well
suited to be a depot of arms and munitions of war for
military undertakings in the central and eastern parts of
Spain. The power and the influence of Carthage ex-
tended more and more northwards, and excited at last the
attention and jealousy of Borne, which had for a time
been apparently indifferent to the proceedings of the
Carthaginians in the Pyrensean peninsula. Hasdrubal was
obliged to declare that Carthage would not extend her
conquests beyond the river Ebro. At the same time the
Romans entered into friendly relations with several
Spanish tribes, and concluded a formal alliance with the
important town of Saguntum,^ which, though situated a
good way to the south of the Ebro, was intended to oppose,
under Boman protection, a barrier to the further progress
of the Carthaginians.
This was the state of affairs in Spain when in 221 B.C. Death of
Hasdrubal was cut off prematurely by the hand of an ^*®^™ * •
assassin. The universal voice of the Spanish army ap-
pointed as his successor Hannibal, the eldest son of
Hamilcar Barcas, then only twenty-eight years old.
The Carthaginian people confirmed this choice, and by Hannibal
doing so placed their fate in the hands of an untried iiamiicar
Barcas.
that the foreign mercenaries had any influence in the election. If the Cartha-
ginian citizens serving in the army expressed their wishes as to the choice of
a successor, and even if they possessed a formal right of election, it would hare
been a proceeding differing not very widely from the election of a Eoman consul
by the comitia centuriata, and it could be justified more easily than civil
legislation by an army in the field, such as is reported of Bome (Livy, vii. 16).
That the Carthaginians intentionally left to their armies a voice in the election
of generals Ir clear from a proceeding in the war with the mercenaries, when the
army is allowed to decide whether Hamilcar or Hanno is to command it —
See Polybius, i. 82.
^ The site of Saguntum, on the coast north of Valencia, is now known as
Hoiviedio, or the Old Walls.
l2
148
ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK
IV.
/
young man, of whom they might hope, but could not
know, that he had the spirit of his father. But of one
thing the Carthaginians might well be assured, that the
son had inherited his father's glowing hatred of Bome,
and that with his ardent spirit he held as his sacred duty
the task of avenging past wrongs, and of establishing
the security and power of his native country on the ruins
of the rival city. There can be no doubt that the people
of Carthage shared the sentiments of Hamilcar's family —
that the loss of Sicily and Sardinia, whilst prompting
feelings of revenge, convinced them that a lasting peace
with Eome was impossible. They saw that even the
twenty-four years of war in Sicily had not sufficed to fight
out their quarrel, and that, sooner or later, the contest
must be renewed. Every danger in which Carthage might
possibly be involved, every war with foreign enemies, and
every civil disturbance, might, to the faithless and un-
generous enemy, offer an opportunity for coming forward
with new demands, and for extorting humiliating con-
cessions. If this was the conviction of the Carthaginian
people (and we have no reason to doubt it), they could not
make a happier choice than in appointing Hannibal to the
command in Spain. Never has a nation found a more fit
and worthy representative. Never has the national wiU
and spirit been embodied so completely and so nobly in
one person, as in Hannibal was embodied the spirit and the
will of Carthage. Even the low passion of hate seemed
ennobled in a man who, in a lifelong, almost superhuman
struggle with an overwhelming force, was animated and
fired by it to persevere in a hopeless cause. No Eoman
ever gathered up and concentrated in himself so fully the
great qualities of his nation as Hannibal did those of
Carthage. We should only insult him if we were to com-
pare him with Scipio, or any other of his contemporaries.^
Bome has produced but one man who can compare with
Hannibal. And this Hannibal, so great and powerful,
so nearly fatal to the greatness and the very existence of
* See Arnold, History of Bome^ iii. 64.
THE SECOND PUNIC WAR. 149
Eome, is, though a stranger, the first person we meet with \ CHAP,
in the history of Borne who inspires us with the feeling of v, , '..
personal interest, and with whose doings and sufferings / r^^^"^
we can sympathise. Before Hannibal appears on the/ 218-216
historic stage, the shadowy figures of the Valerii, the] "'°'
Claudii, the Pabii, and hosts of other much-bepraised
Eoman heroes of the good old time, leave us cold and
indifferent. They have too little reality and too little in-
dividuality about them. They are eclipsed by the foreigner
Pyrrhus. But the adventures of Pyrrhus belong only in
part to the history of Eome. Hannibal's whole life, on the
contrary, was absorbed by his contest with the Boman
people. He knew no other aim and aspiration than to lay
Bome in the dust. Hence even the ancients have justly
called the war, of which he was the life and soul,* th^
^ Hannibalian war,' and almost reluctantly have extolled
his name, and inscribed it in imperishable letters on the
tablets of history.
A more dangerous antagonist than Hannibal the Bomans^ Hatred of
never encountered. A high-minded people, able to appre- tohus for
ciate true greatness, would, at least after his fall, have HannibaL
been generous or just to such an enemy, and, by acknow-
ledging his greatness, would have honoured itself. The
Bomans acted otherwise. Bitterly as they hated, reviled,
and persecuted Carthage, the most deadly poison of their
hatred they poured upon Hannibal ; they did not hesitate
to blacken his memory by the most revolting accusations,
and they went so far as to hold him alone personally
responsible for the calamities which the long war brought
over Italy. This feeling of hostility to Hannibal suggested
or confirmed the account which Fabius Pictor, the oldest
Boman historian, gave of the origin of the war.* Hannibal,
It was said, began the war on his own responsibility, with-
out the consent, nay, even against the wish of the govem-
' Polybius, ix. 22 : rmv iKordpoiSf 'Vwfiolots ^tffii Kot Kapxn^ovlotSf 'npoffirijrr6rrmr
Hal <rvfA0tUi^6yrwy cfs ^y &>^p dCrtos Koi fila ^vx^t ^^•^ ^^ ^V *Awlfiov,
* Poljbius, iii. 8.
150 EOJrUN HISTORY.
BOOK ment of Carthage. ^ He began it for merely selfish purposes,
.. ^_L^ to put an end to impeachments which his political oppo-
nents were at that time bringing forward against the
friends of his father and his brother-in-law.* The war
was therefore not a war of the Carthaginian people with
Bome, but a war of Hannibal and his party, undertaken
in the interest of this party and of the family of Hamilcar
Barcas. Even the expedition to Spain had, according to
this yiew, been undertaken by Hamilcar, without the
approbation and authority of the goyemment, for the
purpose of avoiding and baffling the impending inquiry
into his conduct in Sicily.' Hasdrubal showed the same
contempt of the constituted authorities. He founded for
himself an empire in Spain, independent of Carthage, and
he entertained the design of overthrowing the republic,
and of making himself king.* The government was not
strong enough to curb and control the men of the house
of Barcas. It was dragged into the war with Rome
against its will, and in spite of its conviction that the war
would be pernicious to the state ; but, though unable to
prevent the war, the government of Carthage punished
Hannibal by refusing or stinting the supplies or reinforce-
ments which he wanted to carry his Italian campaign to a
victorious end.
Heal Poly bins * has, in a few words, exposed the utter absurdity
position of
* This is perhaps the echo of the excuses by which, after the disastrous
termination of the war, the Carthaginians endeavoured to cast the blame on
Hannibal. Livy (xxx. 22) puts the following words into the mouth of the
Carthaginian ambassadors : ' £um iniussu Senatus non Alpes modo sed Iberum
quoque transgressum, nee Romanis solum, sed ante etiam Saguntinis privato
eonsUio bellum intulisse/ (Conf. ibid. s. 16, c. 42.) Yet this speech itself is
perhaps based upon the erroneous supposition of HannibaVs guilt, and is not
a true report of the words used by the Carthaginian ambassadors. For we
shall see that, when peace was concluded, Hannibal was still at the head of
affairs in Carthage, and he would hardly hare tolerated such arguments as
those reported by Livy. Napoleon I., after his fall, was in a similar manner
made responsible for the wars in which he had involved France ; but with
more justice, for he was an absolute sovereign, and his will was law in France.
Carthage was a republic, and no individual could force the majority of the
senate and the people to adopt a policy which they condemned.
■ Appian, vi. 9, vii. 3. • Appian, vii. 2.
* Polybius, iii. 8, § 2. • Polybius, iii. 8.
THE SECOND PUNIC WAK. 151
of a view like this. * If/ he says, * Hannibal had been a CHAP,
mutinous general, and determined, for his own personal ^^
interests, to involve his country in a war which the govern- p^R^n
ment was anxious to avoid, how did it happen that the 218--216
latter did not seize the opportunity of getting rid of such
a dangerous citizen, when, after the fall of Saguntum, the ^^^ Car-
Eomans demanded that he should be given up to them ? thaginian
But the Carthaginian senate, far from sacrificing or even ^^^^
disowning him, approved his actions as with one voice, ac-
<;epted and returned with enthusiasm the Koman declara-
tion of war, and carried on this war for seventeen years, until
the state was exhausted and compelled to sue for peace.**
When, after the war with the mercenaries, Carthage
was enfeebled and crippled, and Rome, in utter defiance of
' It is a matter of some surprise that, after such a confutation, Mommsen,
in his History of Borne (vol. i. chap, iv.), should return to the false representa-
tion of Fabius Pictor. He dwells with a censorial pleasure on the alleged
hostility between the house of Hamilcar Barcas and ihe Carthaginian govern-
ment. He speaks of a predilection (' Hinneigung ') of the Carthagiuiaa
oligarchy {i.e. Hannibal's political opponents) for Rome, of an 'understanding
between them and the Eomans which bordered upon treason/ of a *pro-
Koman government' in Carthage. When Hannibal succeeded to the command
of the army, ' the peace party was in power at Carthage,' and * they had no
intention to allow the young man to indulge in freaks of youthful patriotism
at the public cost ; ' but Hannibal paid no attention to their wishes or com-
mands ; ' he reported that he was obliged to punish Saguntum for some act of
hostility to Carthaginian subjects, and, without waiting for an answer, began
the siege, i.e. the war with Rome. The Carthaginian senate were more afraid
of their own army and the populace than of Rome, or they saw that it was
too late to undo what had been done, or else they lacked energy for decisive
action and resolved at last to resolve upoti nothingy andy without waging the war,
to suffer it to be waged* This view is sufficiently condemned by its intrinsio
improbability, and has therefore been rejected in antiquity by Polybiua
(iii. 8 ; iii. 13, §§ 1, 2), and in modem times by Heeren (Ideen, ii. 1, 8), Vlncke
(Der £weite punische Krieg, 1841, pp. 142-170), and C.Peter (Studien eur
rim, Gesch. pp. 19-27). It assumes a political situation in Carthage such
as can only be brought about by a total wreck of order, by anarchy and
confusion. It describes the government as venal, timid, listless, without
decision, trembling before its own army, split into factions, opposed to the
noblest patriots, partial to the enemies of the country, drifting hopelessly into
a tremendous war, which it condemned and vainly tried to avoid. How such
a government was able to carry on the war for seventeen years, and almost ta
overthrow the most warlike and powerful state of the ancient world, is a
miracle which defies our understanding, and which can be believed only by a
blind unreasoning faith.
152
ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK
IV.
Resources
of
Carthage.
justice, had availed herself of the distress of her old rival to
deprive her of Sardinia, then it was that Hamilcar Barcas
devoted himself and his house to the service of the avenging
goddess, and planned the war with Borne J He lefb his
native town to lay in Spain the foundation of a new colonial
empire of Carthage, and when he was offering up sacrifice
at the altar of the tutelary god of the Carthaginian people
and was praying for his divine protection, he bade his son
Hannibal, then a boy of nine years, lay his hands on
the altar and swear that he would always be the enemy
of Bome. He took him to Spain ; he brought him up in
his camp, to prepare him for the task for which he had
destined him, and he sacrificed his life to save that
of his son.^ Tor eight years Hannibal served under his
brother-in-law Hasdrubal. His military bearing made
him the idol of the army. Then, in the full vigour of life,
and still in all the freshness of youth, he was summoned,
by the confidence of his comrades, and by the unanimous
voice of the Carthaginian people,* to take the command of
the army and to carry out the policy of his father.
Twenty years had elapsed since the peace of 241 B.C.
With wonderful energy and success Carthage had recovered
jfrom her misfortunes. The government was no longer in
the hands of the oligarchy ; the popular party was at the
head of affairs, and was led by the men of the house of
Barcas. An extensive territory had been conquered in
Sp.;.. The Iberia trib«, s.b^ ij force o? a™, or
conciliated by peaceful negotiations and readily submitting
to Carthaginian authority, fiirniahed for the armj an abnn-
dant supply of volunteers or compulsory recruits* in place
of the inconstant Gallic mercenaries, of whom the Cartha-
ginian army was mainly composed in the first war. The
Libyan subjects were reduced to obedience, and famished
excellent foot soldiers. The Numidians, more closely
united with Carthage than ever before, by the military
genius and the policy of Hamilcar and Hasdrubal, sup*
' Polybius, iii, 10. $§ 3 and 4 ; iii. 13, § 1. « Diodoms, xxv. fir. 2.
• Polybius, iii. 18, § 4. * Livy, xxl 11, 21.
THE SECOND PUNIC WAR, 153
plied a light cavalry that could not be matched by the CHAP.
Romans. The finances had to some extent recovered, .. . '.^
in spite of the heavy contributions of war exacted by p^^
Borne, amounting to 4,400 talents.^ The time was come 2ia-2i6
when Carthage might hope to renew the contest with ^'^'
a fair hope of final victory. The Romans, like the poiicyof
Carthaginians, looked upon the peace of 241 B.C. as ^®
only an armistice, but they very much underrated the delaying
strength of their conquered rival. They regarded Car- ^^^^^^ ^r
thage as so thoroughly broken and exhausted that they the war.
might at pleasure resume the war at any time most con«
venient for them. They were prepared to do so after the
termination of the war with the mercenaries; but the
readiness with which Carthage in that time of depression
submitted to the humiliating conditions imposed as the
price of peace averted an open rupture, while the resig-
nation of the Carthaginians being interpreted as an un-
mistakeable sign of weakness strengthened the conviction
that for the future also Carthage would be unable to
offer a long or determined resistance. The Romans
had, probably, but an imperfect knowledge of the great
advance which the Carthaginian power had made by its
conquests in Spain, still less were they informed of the
invigoration of the political system of Carthage by the
triumph of the democracy and the ascendancy of the
family of Barcas. Jtome was therefore in no hurry to
follow up the policy struck out in the first Punic war.
She was the more inclined to delay as this war had dealt
severe blows to Italy, and had caused losses which time
had not yet repaired. Moreover, the acquisition of
Sardinia was followed by almost uninterrupted hostilities
with the stubborn inhabitants of that island, and by
similar petty wars in Corsica and Liguria — wars which,
though unimportant in themselves, were yet sufficient to
withdraw the attention of the Romans from other quarters.
The Illyrian war (229 B.C.) was a far more serious affair,
• Upwards of 1,100,000/.
154
ROMAN mSTORY.
BOOK
IV.
Alliance
of Sagun-
tum with
Home.
Prepara-
tions of
Hannibal.
especiallj as it engaged the whole Boman fleet. But it
was more especially the long threatened war with the
Gauls (225 B.C.) which procured for Carthage a temporary
respite and a continuance of the peace with Borne. This
war lasted for four years. It came to an end just before
the death of Hasdrubal, and even then it was ended only
in appearance. The resistance of the Gauls in the valley
of the Po was broken in 221 B.C., and the Romans
set about securing the possession of the land by esta-
blishing the two colonies of Placentia and Cremona on the
Po. Now, at last, the time seemed to have arrived when
Bome could devote herself to the settlement of her old
dispute with her rival for supremacy in the western
Mediterranean.
During the last few years the attention of the Bomans had
been drawn to the progress of the Carthaginians in Spain.
Spanish tribes and towns which dreaded annexation to
the Carthaginian province applied for assistance to Bome.
The result of this application was the treaty by which
Hasdrubal had pledged himself to confine his conquests
within the Ebro. Another result was the alliance between
Bome and Saguntum. According to the conditions of the
peace of 241 b.o. the allies of either of the two contracting
states were not to be molested by the other. It is true
that Saguntum * was not the ally of Bome at the time when
that peace was concluded. But, nevertheless, it was evi-
dent that Bome could not be debarred from concluding
new alliances, and it appeared a matter of course that she
must and would afiPbrd her protection no less to her new
allies than to the old. If the Carthaginians questioned
or disregarded this claim of Bome, the peace was broken,
and no appeal was left but to arms. No doubt could exist
on this subject either at Bome or at Carthage.
Immediately upon his appointment to the command of
the army, Hannibal was anxious to begin the war with
Bome, and the time would have been extremely favourable,
as in the year 221 B.C. Bome was still sufficiently occupied
with the Gauls. But he was obliged to make ample pre-
1 See p. 147.
THE SECOND PUNIC WAR. 155
parations before undertaking so serious an enterprise, and CHAP.
moreover the Carthaginian possessions in Spain had to be > ^— L-^
enlarged and secured, so as to serve as a proper basis j^™^
for his operations. He also wished, no doubt, to feel and 218-216
B.C.
try the extent of his power over the army and of his autho-
rity at home ; to familiarize himself with the troops who
were destined to carry out his bold conceptions — ^to seat
himself firmly in the saddle and to try the mettle of his
steed. He therefore devoted the years 221 and 220 to the
task of subduing some tribes south of the Ebro, training
his army, inspiring his men with confidence in his com-
mand, enriching them with booty and thus heightening
their zeal, and finally of providing for the security of
Spain and Africa during his absence.
All these preparations were made by the beginning of the impor-
year 219 b.o. The first object of his attack was Saguntum, Saguntum.
the rich, powerful, and weU-fortified town to the south
of the Ebro, which had lately sought and obtained the
Soman alliance. The Saguntines boasted of Greek origin,
and called themselves descendants of colonists from the
island of Zakyuthos — an assertion for which, in all pro-
bability, they had no authority beyond the similarity of the
two names. They appear to have been genuine Iberians,
like the other nations in Spain, and to have had no more
af&nity with the Greeks than could be claimed by the
Romans. At that time, when the Eomans acted as pro-
tectors and liberators of the Greeks in the Adriatic and
Ionian Seas, and when they began to pride themselves
on their assumed descent from Homeric heroes, the Grecian
name was a welcome pretext and a means for obtaining
political advantages. But even without this pretext the
alliance of Saguntum was of sufficient importance to Rome.
It was admirably situated and adapted for a base of
operations against the Carthaginian possessions in Spain,
and could answer the purpose which Messana had served in
Sicily. At any rate it might be made a barrier against
the further advance of the Carthaginians, and with this
view it had been received into Roman protection while
Hasdrubal commanded in Spain.
156
KOMAN HISTORY.
BOOK
IV.
Roman
embassy
tx>
Hannibal.
Siege* of
SnguDtum
by
Hannibal.
The Boman senate felt convinced that a warning would
at once be followed by an abandonment of the Cartha-
ginian designs on Sagnntum, which of late had become
more manifest, and of which the Saguntines had repeatedly
informed the senate.* It accordingly dispatched an em-
bassy to Hannibal (in 219 B.C.) to point out the conse-
quences if he persisted in hostilities against the friends
and clients of the Boman people. But Hannibal made no
secret of his intentions. He told the ambassadors that
the alliance between Saguntum and Bome was no reason
why he should not treat the former as an independent
state ; that he had as much right as the Bomans to inter-
fere in the internal affairs of Saguntum, and in case of
necessity to defend that town from the usurped protec-
torate of Bome.* A similar answer was given to the
ambassadors by the senate of Carthage, whither they had
proceeded from Hannibal's camp.'
The Bomans knew now that they had no longer to deal
with the peace-loving, yielding Hasdrubal, nor with a
broken-spirited people who recoiled with terror from even
the threat of war. Now was the time, if they meant
seriously to stand up for their new allies, to send forth-
with a fleet and an army to Spain, and this was demanded
by their own interest as well as by that of the Saguntines.
But they did not stir during the whole of this year, and
left the despairing Saguntines to their fate. Hannibal,
at no loss for a pretext to declare war against Saguntum,
laid regular siege to the town in the spring of the year
> Polybins, iii. 16. § 1. Livy, xxi. 6.
' Polybius, iii. 14, 15. The Romans had put an end to a civil var in
Sa^ntum, and had killed the leaders of the party opposed to them. There
can be no doubt that this party was a Carthaginian party. The situation in
Saguntum was therefore similar to that which had existed in Messana at
the commencement of the first Punic war, when a Roman and a Carthaginian
party divided the town. Perhaps Hannibal hoped by means of his adherents to
get possession of Saguntum, without employing force. If he had l)een successful
in this, he might have begun his campaign a whole year earlier, whilst the
Romans were still occupied in lUyria, and whilst the situation in the north of
Italy was far more favourable for Carthage than afterwards.
* Livy, zzi. 11. Folybius, iii. 16, § 12.
THE SECOND PUNIC WAS. 157
219 B.C. But the Saguntines resisted with, the obstinacy C&ap.
and determination which have at all times characterised ^ ^^^'_-
Spanish towns. For eight months all the eflPorts of the ^^^^
besiegers were in vain. Hannibal's military genius was 218-216
of little avail in the slow operations of a regular siege, ^'^*
where success depends not so much on rapid resolutions
and bold combinations as on stubborn perseverance in a
methodical plan. The eight months of tedious, harassing,
and bloody fighting for the possession of Saguntum were
calculated to disgust Hannibal with aU siege operations,
and we find that during all his campaigns in Italy he
undertook them unwillingly, and persevered only in one
with any degree of firmness. It is probable that the hope
of Boman succour braced the courage of the Saguntines
and protracted their defence. But as this hope in the
end proved vain, the resistance of the brave defenders of
the doomed town was borne down. Saguntum was taken
by storm, and suffered the fate of the conquered. The
surviving inhabitants were distributed as slaves among the
soldiers of the victorious army, the articles of value were
sent to Carthage, the ready money was applied to the
preparations for the impending campaign.*
Now that the war had in fact begun, the Romans sent Second
another embassy to Carthage, as if they still thought it o^^f^*^^
possible to preserve peace. But their demands were Romans to
such that they might safely have dispatched an army at thaginians.
the same time, for they could not expect that the Cartha-
ginians would listen to them. The Roman ambassadors re-
quired that Hannibal and the committee of senators which
accompanied the army should be given up to them as a
sign that the Carthaginian commonwealth had taken no
part in, and did not approve of, the violence done to the
allies of Rome. But the authorities at Carthage were far
from ignominiously sacrificing their general, and submit-
ting themselves to Roman mercy and generosity. They
endeavoured to show that the attack on Saguntum did not
involve a rupture of the peace with Rome, because, when
' Polybiufl, iii. 17, § 10. Livy, m. 16.
158 EOMAN HISTORY.
BOOK that peace was concluded by Hamilcar and Catulus in 241
- _ ^^' B.O., Saguntum was not yet numbered among the allies of
Borne, and could not therefore be included among those
whom Carthage had undertaken to leave unmolested.
The Boman ambassadors declined to discuss the question
of right or wrong, and insisted on the simple acceptance
of their demands. At last, after a long altercation, the
chief of the embassy, Quintus Fabius Maximus, gathering
up the folds of his toga, exclaimed : * Here I carry
peace and war; say, ye men of Carthage, which you
choose.' * We accept whatever you give us,' was the
answer. * Then we give you war,' replied Fabius, spreading
out his toga ; and without another word he lefb the senate-
house, amid the boisterous exclamations of the assembly
that they welcomed war, and would wage it with the spirit
which animated them in accepting it.^
Character Thus the war was resolved upon and declared on both
second sidcs — a war which stands forth in the annals of the
Punic war. ancient world without a parallel. It was not a war about
a disputed boundary, about the possession of a province,
or some partial advantage ; it was a struggle for existence,'
for supremacy or destruction. It was to decide whether
the Greco-Roman civilisation of the West or the Semitic
civilisation of the East was to be established in Europe,
and to determine its history for all future time. The
war was one of those in which Asia struggled with Europe,
like the war of the Greeks and Persians, the conquests
of Alexander the Great, the wars of the Arabs, the Huns,
and the Tartars. Whatever may be our admiration of
Hannibal, and our sympathy with heroic and yet defeated
Carthage, we shall nevertheless be obliged to acknowledge
that the victory of Rome — the issue of this trial by battle
— ^was the most essential condition for the healthy develop-
ment of the human race.
» Polybius, iii. 20, 33. Livy, xxi. 18.
* Polybius, ii. 14: 'Aw(/Baj hrtfid\9T0 KoraXimiv tV *P»/ta(«r Zwaffr^iw,
K.r,K Appian (vi. 4) erroneously calls the second Punic war a war for the
possession of Spain. See Vincke, Der ztoeite punische Krieg, pp. 16, 124.
THE SECOND PUNIC WAR. 169
Since the first war with Carthage, the strength of Rome CHAP,
had materially increased. At the time when the war > , '^^
broke out in Sicily, ten years had scarcely passed since ^^^
the completion of the conquest of Italy. In Samnium, 21 8-21 6
Lucania, and Apulia the generation still lived which had ^'^'
measured its strength with Eome in the long struggle ^^^{j^^^
for supremacy and independence. The memory of all the Roman
sufferings during the war, the humiliation of defeat, the °* ^^^'
old animosity and hatred were yet alive in their hearts.
Now, however, after the lapse of sixty years, a new genera-
tion had grown up in Italy, which was a living part of
the body of the Roman people, and had given up all idea
of carrying on a separate existence. In a hundred battles
the conquered nations of Italy had fought and bled by the
side of the Eomans. An Italo-Eoman national feeling
had grown up in the wars in which Bomans and Italians
had confronted Libyans, Gauls, and Illyrians. Where
could the peoples of Italy find the enjoyments, hopes, and
blessings of national life, except in their union with
Borne?
In an economical point of view, the supremacy of Borne Gain tx)
was, for the Italians, a compensation for the loss of their '^l^^,^
independence. It had put a stop to an intolerable evil — tribes.
the endless disputes and wars, which appear to be insepar-
able from small communities of imperfect civilisation. The
calamities of a great war^ like that in Sicily between Bome
and Carthage, strike the imagination by the great battles,
the sacrifices, and losses on a large scale which charac-
terise them ; but the everlasting paltry feuds of neighbours,
accompanied by pillage, burning, devastation, and murder
in every direction, cause a much larger amount of human
suffering, especially where, as in Italy at that time, every
man is a warrior, every stranger an enemy, every enemy a
robber, and all look upon war as a source of profit. This
deplorable state of things had ceased in Italy after the
supremacy of Bome was established. Henceforth, it was
alone the Boman people that waged war, and the theatre
of war had mostly been beyond the confines of Italy.
160
EOMAN HISTORY.
BOOK
IV.
BnrdenB
of the
Eoman
allies.
Population
of Italy.
When the nations of Italy had furnished their contin-
gents and contributed their share to the expenses of the
war, they could till their fields in peace, without fearing
that a hostile band would suddenly break in upon them,
set fire to the standing com, cut down the fruit trees,
drive away the cattle, and carry off their wives and
children into slavery. Only the districts near the coast
had been alarmed by the Carthaginians during the first
war; but the interior regions had been quite exempt
from hostile attacks ; and, even on the coast, the numerous
Boman colonies had offered protection from the worst evils
of war.
The public burthens which the allies of Rome had to
bear were moderate. They paid no direct taxes. The
military service was no hardship for a warlike population,
especially as there was always a chance of gaining booty.
The Greek cities were principally charged with furnishing
ships. The other allies sent contingents to the Boman
army, which, in the aggregate, seldom amounted to a
greater number of men than were furnished by Bome
itself. In the field these troops were victualled by the
Boman state, and were therefore no source of expense to
the allies. If we bear in mind that the different Italian
communities enjoyed, for the most part, perfect freedom
and self-government in the management of their own
affairs, and that everywhere the leading men found their
authority increased by their intimate connexion with the
Boman nobility, we can easily understand that, in the
beginning of the Hannibalian war, the whole of Italy was
firmly united, and formed a striking contrast to the
Carthaginian state with its discontented subjects and
inconstant allies.
Of the state of the population of Italy in the period
before the second Punic war, we are tolerably well in-
formed. Polybius relates * that at the time when the
Gauls threatened to invade Etruria (in 225 e.g.) a general
* Polybius, ii. 24.
THE SECOND PUNIO WAE. 161
census was taken of the military forces of wliicli Borne CHAP.
VIII
might dispose in case of war, and that the number of >^ — »-^
men capable of bearing arms amounted to 770,000. If pg^^
this statement is, on the whole, to be trusted, not only for 218-216
the accuracy of the information originally obtained by the
officers employed in the census, but for the faithful pre-
servation of the official numbers by the historians,' we
can infer from it that at the time in question, i.e, shortly
before the appearance of Hannibal in Italy, the population
of the peninsula was nearly as great as it is at the
present day, and that it amounted to about 9,000,000 in
those parts which then were included in the name of
Italy, '1.6. the peninsula south of Liguria and Transalpine
Guul, and exclusive of the islands.^
The Carthaginian statesmen had a just appreciation Naval
of the dangers involved in a war with Home. The Eoman ^J®' ^^
armies were composed of citizens accustomed to the use Bomans
of arms, and of faithful allies equally warlike and equally ^^^gixJianB.
brave. Forces like these they could not match, either in
quantity or quality. The citizens of Carthage were neither
so numerous as those of Bome, nor available for service
beyond Africa. The subjects and allies were not very
trustworthy. The Libyans and Ifumidians had only just
been reduced again to submission, after a sanguinary war ;
the Spaniards were hardly broken to the yoke, and served
rather the generals than the commonwealth of Carthage.
The ancient undoubted superiority of the Carthaginian
navy was gone. Bome was now mistress of the western
Mediterranean, as well by her fleets as through the posses-
sion of all the harbours in Italy, Sicily, Sardinia, Corsica,
' A few variations occur, indeed, but they are not material. Eutropius
(iii. 5), on the authority of Fabius Pictor, gives 800,000 as the right num-
ber; Pliny (Hist. Nat. iii. 24) gives 780,000. Livy's statement (epit. 20),
giving the number as 300,000, must arise from an error in transcribing the
text.
' The population, in 1865, of the former kingdom of Naples, of the States then
belonging to the Church, the Marches, Umbria, and Tuscany, was 10,694,252
(according to Kolb's Staiutik), Compare Zumpt, Udier den Stand der Bevolk-
erung im Alterthum {Ahhandlungen der Berliner JJsademie, 1812, p. 19), and
the Appendix at the end of the present volume.
VOL. n. M
162
BOMAN HISTORY.
BOOK
IV.
Alliance
of the Car-
thaginians
with the
Gauls.
and even on the coast of Ulyria. In the basin of the
Tyrrhenian Sea, in the Adriatic and Ionian Seas, maritime
operations on a large scale were veiy hazardous for
Carthage, as nowhere was a single port open to them.
They could interrupt the Boman communications, capture
transports and trading vessels, harass and alarm the coasts
of Italy ; but this kind of piratical warfare could not lead
to great results. In her finances Carthage was no longer
what she had been. Her resources had been drained in
the long wars in Sicily and Africa, and the war indemni-
ties exacted by Bome were felt even by the wealthy state
of the Punic merchants to be a heavy burden. The new
conquests in Spain, it is true, had brought some relief.
But the loss of Sicily and the hostility of Bome had, to a
great extent, paralysed trade. Even before the end of the
Sicilian war, it is clear that the financial resources of
Carthage had begun to fail. The equipment of the fleet,
which was routed at the iBgatian Islands, had absorbed
all the means left at the disposal of the state. When this
great and supreme effort had failed, peace had become
absolutely necessary. The war with the mercenaries was
provoked by the unseasonable but necessary illiberality
with which the claims of the soldiers for overdue pay and
promised compensations were met. If Spain had not
yielded a rich return beyond paying for the military
enterprises of Hamilcar and Hasdrubal, it would have been
hard for Carthage to recover strength for a new contest.
As it was, her financial weakness must have been the
principal cause of the slowness and inefficiency which she
displayed in sending reinforcements to Hannibal.
Thus, with her own strength alone, Carthage could
scarcely hope to meet her hated and dreaded antagonist
on equal terms. It was necessary to secure allies, and
the events of the last few years seemed in the highest
degree favourable for organising in different quarters a
combined action against Bome. Above all Hannibal
reckoned upon the co-operation of the Gauls in the north
of Italy. In spite of their defeats in Etruria and on the
THE SECOND PUNIC WAR.
163
Po, they were far from being broken, dispirited, or re-
conciled. On the contrary, the attempt of the Bomans
to establish colonies in their country provoked their
renewed hostility. If these Grauls, with their rude un-
disciplined, ill-armed hordes alone, were able to jeopardize
the Boman supremacy and to shake the foundations of
the Boman empire, what might not Hannibal expect to
accomplish with their aid, if he regulated their impetuous
bravery, and ranged them among his highly disciplined
Libyan and Spanish soldiers P The Gauls had not yet
ceased to be the terror of southern Europe. Even as
mercenaries they excelled in many military qualities.
Fighting in their own cause, defending their own homes,
they might, in a good military school, become invincible.
These hopes hastened the resolution of Carthage to
renew the war, and determined the plan of the campaign.
The land of the Gauls in the north of Italy was to be the
basis of Hannibal's operations, and the Gaulish warriors
were to fight under his standards. The spoliation and
plunder of Italy was to pay for the expenses of the war.
It was this consideration which determined Hannibal to
march across the Pyrenees and the Alps into the country
of the Insubrians and Boians, on the Po, where he was
expected with impatience. He had for some time past
been in negotiation with these peoples. They had sup-
plied him with information regarding the Alpine passes, and
had promised guides ; and he reckoned on their strenuous
assistance when he undertook that enterprise which filled
the whole world with astonishment and admiration.
The Gauls were not the only allies that Hannibal hoped
to find in Italy. He knew that a hostile army was sure to
be welcomed in Africa by the discontented subjects of
Carthage. At the time of Agathokles, during the invasion
of Begulus, and during the mutiny of the mercenaries, the
Libyans and Numidians — nay, on one occasion, even the
kindred citizens of TJtica — had made common cause with
the enemies of Carthage. Hannibal hoped in like manner
to gain the adhesion of the Marsians, the Samnites,
M 2
CHAP.
VIII.
— — » — —
First
Period,
218-216
B.C.
Expected
revolt of
the Italian
allies.
164 ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK Campanians, Lncanians, and Bruttians, perhaps even of the
_ . ' - LatinSy if he should be able, by brilliant victories, to banish
their fear of the power and vengeance of Borne. He did
not know how firmly these peoples were united with Borne,
and perhaps he forgot that his alliance with the Gauls,
the common enemies of all Italy, was calculated to make
his friendship suspected.
Attitude of Not in Italy alone, but also beyond the confines of Italy,
doniwtt^^' *^® Carthaginians hoped to find allies for an attack upon
govern- Bome. Antigonus, the king of Macedonia, watched with
™®° ' uneasiness the aggressive policy of the Bomans, and their
interference in the affairs of the Greek states. A Boman
party in these states could not but be hostile to Macedonia.
It was natural, therefore, that he should be ready to op-
pose the Bomans. He had already instigated Demetrius
of Pharos to the war with Bome, and after his expulsion
from niyria he had received him at his court, and refiised
to surrender him to the Bomans. Messengers went back-
wards and forwards between Macedonia and Carthage,
and Hannibal was justified in hoping that the first great
victory would secure his active co-operation in a war with
Bome.
ProTisioiiB These plans, negotiations, and preparations occupied
^ii»rf r Hannibal during the period from the winter of 219 to
the defence 218 B.C. He had, moreover, to provide for the military
and Africa, defence of Spain and Africa during his absence. He sent
a body of 15,000 Spaniards to Carthage, and an equal
force of Libyans from Africa to Spain, making the troops
serve at the same time as hostages to guarantee the
fidelity of their countrymen. On the approach of winter
he had allowed his Spanish troops to go home on furlough,
feeling sure that they would be the more ready to join
him again for the following campaign in spring. The
plunder of Saguntum had stimulated their eagerness to
serve under the Carthaginian general, and they were
ready to try again the fortune of war under such a
victorious and liberal leader.
THE SECOND PUNIC WAR. 165
When in the spring ^ of 218 B.C., Hannibal had again CHAP,
collected his army and made all the necessary prepara-
tions, he set out on his march from New Carthage, rather p^^^
later, it may be supposed, than he had originally intended 218-216
— ^in the beginning of summer.* His force consisted of ^'^'
ninety thousand foot, twelve thousand horse, and thirty- ^^^u^i
seven elephants.' Until he reached the Ebro, his road from New
passed through the territory of tribes that had already 2irB^®*
submitted to Carthage. But the land between the Ebro
and the Pyrenees was inhabited by independent and
hostile peoples, who resisted the advance of the Carthagi-
nian army. Hannibal, who had no time to lose, sacrificed
a considerable portion of his army for the purpose of
quickly forcing his way through this country, and he
succeeded in his plan, at the cost of losing twenty
thousand men. Having reached the Pyrenees, he left his
brother Hasdrubal and ten thousand men to defend the
newly conquered territory. An equal number of Spanish
soldiers he dismissed to their homes, finding that they
were reluctant to accompany him, and preferring to take
with him a smaller army of chosen and devoted warriors
than a large discontented host. Thus his forces were re-
duced to fifty thousand foot and nine thousand horse with
the elephants, when he crossed the Pyrenees by some pass
near the Mediterranean, apparently without encountering
any serious diflBiculty. The Gaulish tribes living between
the Pyrenees and the Rhone did not oppose the march.
It was only when Hannibal arrived at the Ehone that he
encountered any resistance. The Grauls in that part of
the country had assembled a force on the left, or eastern,
bank of the river, and endeavoured to prevent the passage.
Hannibal was obliged to halt a few days before he could
cross. He sent a detachment under Hanno higher up
the river to an undefended place, where they crossed
without difficulty on rapidly constructed rafts ; meanwhile
he collected all the vessels that could be procured, caused
» Polybius, iii. 34, § 6.
* PolybiuB, V. 1, § 3 : ipx'^f^*^' ^' O^p^tas. * Polybiua, iii. 35.
166 ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK trees to be felled and hollowed out for canoes, and when,
> r^ ' on the third day, the fire signals of Hanno annoonced that
he had arrived in the rear of the Ganls, he forced the
passage. The Grauls, attacked in front and rear, made no
long resistance. On the fifth day after his arrival on the
Bhone, Hannibal had gained the left bank, and caused the
elephants and heavy baggage to be ferried over on rafts,
landing of The passage of the Rhone was not yet quite accom-
army at plished when intelligence arrived which showed that the
Mii88ilia. utmost dispatch was necessary, unless the whole plan for
the ensuing campaign was to be upset at the very begin-
ning. A Roman army had landed at Massilia, and was
now only four days' march from the mouths of the Rhone.
A collision with the Romans in Gaul, even if it had led to
the most brilliant victory, would have detained Hannibal
so long that the passage of the Alps would have been
impossible before the winter had set in. It was already
the beginning of October, and in a short time the moun-
tains would be impassable ; and if the Alps were not
crossed before the winter, the Romans would probably
block up the passes, and Africa, instead of Italy, would
become the theatre of war.
Inade- The Roman embassy which had demanded satisfaction
prepam- in Carthage for the attack on Saguntum, and had formally
tions of declared war, had not been dispatched from Rome, as
Romans, might have been expected, immediately after the fall of
Saguntum in the course of the year 219, but in the follow-
ing spring. The same slowness which the Romans had
exhibited in their diplomatic action they showed in the
actual preparations for war. They had evidently no con-
ception of Hannibal's plan for the ensuing campaign, nor
of the rapidity with which his ardent spirit worked. The
Romans flattered themselves with the idea that they
would be able to choose their own time to begin hostilities,
and to select the theatre of war. They waited quietly for
the return of the ambassadors from Spain, whither they
had proceeded from Carthage, for the purpose of making
themselves acquainted with the state of afPairs and of
THE SECOND PUNIC WAR. 167
encouraging the friends of Eome to persevere in their CHAP,
fidelity. Then the two customary consular armies were ' -
levied in the usual manner ; the one destined, under the p^^^
command ofTiberius Sempronius Longus, to be sent to 2i8-i2i6
Sicily, and from thence to cross over into Afirica to attack **^'
the Carthaginians in their own country ; the other, under
Publius Cornelius Scipio, to act against Hannibal in Spain.
The Bomans hoped to carry on the war with four legions,
little thinking that twenty would not suffice.
Meanwhile they were busily engaged in completing the Rimng of
conquest of Northern Italy.^ Two new strongholds, the o-aulH.*^
colonies of Placentia and Cremona, had been established
there for the purpose of keeping the country in subjection.
Each of them had received a garrison of six thousand
colonists. Three commissioners, among them the con-
sular Lutatius, who had gained the decisive victory at the
iBgatian Islands (in 241 B.C.), were engaged in assigning
the land to the colonists, and in making the necessary
arrangements for the administration of the new communi-
ties, when they were suddenly surprised, in the spring of
218 B.C., by a new rising of the Boians.* These people,
who saw their land distributed to Roman colonists, felt in
the highest degree alarmed and exasperated, and could
not restrain their impatience nor wait for the arrival of
Hannibal. They fell upon the colonists in different parts
of the country, forced them to take refuge in the fortified
town of Mutina,' and laid siege to the town. Under the
pretext of wishing to negotiate, they succeeded in inducing
the three commissioners to come out of the town for a
conference, seized them treacherously, and held them as a
security for the safety of the hostages which they had
been obliged to give to the Bomans on the conclusion of
peace.
Upon the news of these events, the prsetor Lucius Additional
Roman
> We prefer calling Gallia Cisalpina bj the name used in the text, though, levies.
properly speaking, it was not yet included in the term Italy.
• Poly bins. iii. 40.
' Polybius (iii. 40, { 8) calls Mutina a Koman colony. This is a mistake,
for it was not till 183 b.c. that Mutina was made a colony in due form.
168
ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK
IV.
Voyage
and march
of Scipio.
Manlins, who commanded a legion at Ariminum, marched
in all haste towards Mntina; but he was surprised in the
midst of the dense forests which, at that time, covered
those plains/ was repulsed with great loss, and block-
aded in a Tillage called Tanetum, on the Po, where he
threw up earthworks for his defence. Thus the whole- of
Northern Italj was again in a state of insurrection. The
Somans had not succeeded in extinguishing the fire in
their own house before the enemy attacked it from with-
out. The danger within was even more alarming than
the foreign war, which might possibly be delayed. It was
therefore resolved at Eome to send the two recently levied
legions, which Scipio was to have led into Spain, imme-
diately to the Po, and to raise, in their place, two new
legions for the service in Spain against Hannibal.' This
measure tended, of course, to delay the departure of Scipio
considerably, and it enabled Hannibal to gain a start, and
to carry out his original plan of avoiding a collision with
the Romans until he should have reached Italy.
When at length, probably late in the summer of 218 b.o.,'
' Livy, xxi. 25: 'Silyse tunc circa viam erant, plerisque incultis.'
• Polybius, iii. 40, § 14. According to Livy (xxi. 26), only one of the
two legions of Scipio, with 5,000 allies, was sent to reinforce the praetor
C. Manlius in Cisalpine Gaul.
' Polybius (iii. 41, § 2) says : ol 9h ffrpannrfoX r&y 'Pw/udw^ ^roifuurdntyot rh,
This statement, vague as it is with regard to time, cannot be intended to
mean that both consuls left Home precisely at the same time. Nothing
prevented the departure of Sempronius for Sicily as soon as his two legions
were formed. But Scipio, whose legions were dispatched to the Po, was
obliged to wait until new legions were raised, a process that could hardly take
less than one or two months. It is not likely that during all this time
Sempronius remained idle at Rome, merely for the purpose of starting
simultaneously with his colleague in the opposite direction. His task was
quite different from that of Scipio, and quite independent of it. He intended
to cross from Sicily into Africa, and made extensive operations to carry out
this enterprise in the course of the year 218 b.c. (Polybius, ibid. § 3). The
expression of Polybius, irwh t^v itpaUvj is therefore no sufficient evidence to
show that Scipio, as Mommsen says {Rom. Hist. i. 585), started early enough
from Home to reach Massilia by the end of June. If, as appears from a
comparison of dates, Scipio arrived at the Rhone about the middle of September,
he must have left Rome in August ; Sempronius had left in the beginning of
«ummer for Sicily. The expression dir^ r^v &ptdav may therefore be vaguely
applied to both events.
B.C.
THE SECOND PUNIC WAR. 169
Scipio's legions were formed, he embarked and sailed along chap.
the coast of Etruria and Liguria to the mouths of the v.. , '-.
Bhone, on his way to Spain. Bnt on reaching Massilia p^^
he was surprised by the news that Hannibal, whom he 218-216
expected to encounter in Spain, had crossed the Ebro and
the Pyrenees, and was on his march towards the Bhone.
This was the first intimation which the Bomaus had of
Hannibal's plan. But even yet Scipio was in doubt. If
Hannibal intended to attack Italy from the north, the
coast road to G^noa, and through the country of the
Ligurians, was the nearest. Scipio knew not for certain
that Hannibal intended to cross the Alps, nor which pass
he would choose. To make sure about this he sent a
squadron of horse along the left bank of the Bhone to look
out for Hannibal. If he had arrived in Gaul only a few
days earlier, so as to be able to dispute the passage of the
Bhone, he might have baffled Hannibal's plan. As it was,
his horsemen soon met a party of Ifumidian cavalry
coming down the river to reconnoitre. A skirmish took
place, and the Bomans, on their return, boasted that they
had had the better against superior numbers. The news
they brought sufficed to show that Scipio had come too
late, and that Hannibal had already gained the left bank
of the river. Nevertheless, Scipio marched northwards
with his whole force, hoping perhaps that Hannibal would
turn southwards to meet him. But when he had reached
the spot where Hannibal had crossed the Bhone, and
heard that the Carthaginian army had marched towards
the interior of Gaul, he saw that it was useless to advance
farther, and was no longer doubtful about the plan of his
opponent to penetrate across the Alps into Northern Italy.'
He therefore returned forthwith to Massilia, ordered his
brother Cneius to continue with the legions the voyage to
Spain, and returned himself with a small detachment to
' Polybius, iii. 19, } 1 : i^tfUrBji fi^y &s Mix^ioL fjJXta-TOf xcircur/i^yof
M4ir<yr^ t» abrobt reXfi^ffcu r^8« iroiiia-atrBat i^v eis *lra\Uuf woptiay ....
BntpAp tk rvroXiutiKiraty Mis M ras povs iiwtlyrro k.t A. Compare Polybius,
iii. 61, { 5.
170 EOMAN HISTORY.
BOOK Genoa, whence he hastened to the Po to take the command
IV.
. of the troops assembled there, and to attack Hannibal
immediately after his descent from the mountains.
Boldness Nothing proves more the boldness and grandeur of
domT/' Hannibal's enterprise than the fact that the Bomans did
Hannibal's not suspect it Until he had all but reached the foot of the
^ Alps. In spite of the repeated warnings and the varied
information which they had received from their friends in
Spain, from the Massaliots and the neighbouring Gauls,
it had never occurred to them that Hannibal might
possibly venture upon such a plan. It was, indeed, well
known to them that the Alps were not absolutely im-
passable. The numerous swarms of Gauls that had in-
vaded Italy had found their way across the mountains.
But the Gauls dwelt on both sides of the Alps ; they were
at home among the precipitous rocks and the snow moun-
tains ; and if irregular troops, unencumbered with heavy
baggage, might find their way through these wild regions,
it by no means followed that an amy of Spaniards,
Libyans, Numidian horse, and even elephants would
attempt to scale those mountain walls, where they would
have to encounter the terrors of nature and of hostile
tribes at the same time. When Hannibal, nevertheless,
undertook the enterprise, and carried it to a successful
end, the impression he produced was deep and lasting,
and the exploit was looked upon as hardly short of mira-
culous. Historians delighted in painting and exaggerating
the obstacles with which Hannibal had to contend, the
savage character of the mountaineers no less than the
terrors of nature. Polybius* censures these descriptions,
which, as he remarks, tend to represent Hannibal, not as
a wise and cautious general, but as a reckless adventurer.
Before carrying out his plan, says Polybius, he made
earefiil inquiries respecting the nature of the country
through which he had to march, the sentiments of the
inhabitants, and the length and condition of the road.
* PolybiuB, iii. 47.
THE SECOND PUNIC WAR. 171
Hifl conviction that the enterprise would be difficult and CHAP.
dangerous, bat not impossible, was justified by the event. . ^^' ^
But it seems certain that if Hannibal, as no doubt he _^'*"
Period
expected, had been able to commence his march a month 21 8-21 6
earlier, his loss in crossing the Alps would have been ^•^•
considerably less.
As soon as Hannibal had the whole of his army, in* Hannibal
elusive of the elephants and the baggage, on the left bank ^jiobro-
of the Bhone, he marched northwards, and reached in gi&ns.
four days the confluence of the Ehone and the Isere.' The
country lying between these two rivers was called the
^ Island,' and was inhabited by the Allobrogians, one of
the largest and bravest Gallic tribes.* On his arrival
Hannibal found the natives engaged in a dispute between
two brothers for the chieftainship. He favoured the
claims of the elder brother, and by his interference quickly
settled the dispute, gaining thereby the fiiendship and
support of the new chief. His army was amply supplied
with food, shoes, warm clothing, and new arms, and was
accompanied by the friendly tribe until it reached the
foot of the Alps.
It is, even to the present day, an unsolved question by Passage of
which road Hannibal marched to and across the Alps, ^ ^ ^"*
although Folybius describes it at full length, and was
well qualified to do so, having, only fifty years after
Hannibal, travelled over the same ground, with a view of
* It appears from this that Hannibal must have crossed the Khone about
half way between the sea and the Isere. But it has not been possible to
identify the exact spot. It appears that the most likely place is the neigh-
bourhood of Roquemaure. — See Qttarterli/ Review, vol. cxxiii. p. 198.
' It is perhaps doubtful if in Hannibars time the AUobroges dwelt in the
more level part of the country between the Bhone and Isere, to the west of
the higher mountains. Polybius does not mention the name of the in-
habitants of the * Island ; ' but he opposes them to the AUobroges who
molested Hannibal*B march as soon as he reached the Alps. We might never-
th«>les8 assume that the lowlanders belonged to the same race as the AUobroges
of the mountains, and that the latter formed independent communities. But
the narrative of Polybius (especially iii. 49, § 13) tallies far better with the
assumption that Hannibal's friends in the western part of the ' Island ' were
not AUobroges.
172
ROMAN msTony.
BOOK
IV.
giving a description of it in his great historical work.^
But the descriptions which the ancient writers give of
localities are, for the most part, exceedingly defective and
obscure. Even from Caesar's own narrative we cannot
make out with certainty where he crossed the Bhine and
the Thames, and where he landed on the coast of Britain*
The imperfect geographical knowledge possessed by the
ancients, their erroneous notions of the form and extent
of countries, of the direction of rivers and mountain-
ranges with regard to the four cardinal points,^ in some
measure account for these inaccuracies. Not being accus-
tomed, from their youth upwards, to have accurate maps
before their eyes, they grew up with indistinct conceptions,
and were almost accustomed to a loose and incorrect
mode of expression when speaking of such matters.'
But it seems that, apart from this imperfect knowledge
of geography, they lacked the keen observation of nature
which distinguishes the modems. As they seem all but
insensible to the beauties of landscapes, they were careless
in the examination and study of nature ; and their de-
scriptions of scenery are seldom such that we can draw an
accurate map or picture after them, or identify the
localities at the present time. Moreover, the permanent
features of landscapes — ^the mountains, rivers, glens,
' According to Appian (rii. 4), the pass hj which Hannibal crossed was
afterwards called the Pass of Hannibal (koI Kokweu ilo^os *Ayytj3ov). If this
statement is true, the designation most have been invented at a very late
period, and was based on mere conjectures. Neither Polybius nor even Livy
knew anything of it. In Livy's time the question was already controversial,
and he would no doubt have referred to the designation as an argument, if he
had known it.
' Thus (iii. 47. § 2) Polybius fiincies the source of the Khone to be due
north of the Adriatic, and its course from east to west Livy*8 account of
Hannibal*s marches in Italy is frequently confused and at variance with
geographical facts (Livy, xxii. 3). Appian (vi. 6) makes the Ebro flow into
the Atlantic, and places Saguntum between the Ebro and the Pyrenees.
' What can be more vague than such expressions as 9v<rx»piai and etficaipoc
r^roi, which Polybius uses (iii. 50, § 3). Again, when he describes a locality
as situated fji^ra^h rov HciSotf irot rod Tptfila iroroftoi), he loaves it undecided
whetlier it is on the right or the left bank of the Trebia, and thus he has
given rise to the controversy about the situation of the battle-field in question.
See below, p. 189, note 2.
TUE SEeONB PUNIC WAE. 178
lakes, and plains — had seldom names universally known CHAP,
and generally eurren V as is the case at present ; nor were , _ -
there accurate measurements of distances, heights of j£™*J,
mountains, the width of passes, and the like. Where, in 218-216
addition to these defects, there were even wanting human ^^'
habitations, towns or villages with well-known and re<-
cognisable names, it became impossible to describe a
route like that of Hannibal across the Alps with an
accuracy that excludes all doubts.
Thus it has happened that every Alpine pass, from that G«og^plii-
of Mont Genevre to the Simplon, has in turn been declared ^y^jes
to have been the one by which Hannibal crossed into Italy .^
Nobody can settle this question satisfactorily who has not
travelled over every pass himself. We must leave this inves-
tigation to an Alpine traveller with sufficient leisure and en-
thusiasm, and meanwhile confine ourselves, under the guid-
ance of Poly bins, the oldest and most trustworthy witness,
to find a road which has possibility and probability in its
favour, though, perhaps, absolute certainty is unattainable.
The distances given by Polybius leave, in reality, only a March to
doubt whether Hannibal crossed by the Little St. Bernard g^*^^^®
or by the Mont Cenis.' It is becoming now more and narcL
* PolybiTis, iii. 36, § 2 : *'?trriQw V chK abrhs rits irofuurlas r&¥ rSrwv Koi
wvn/A&y Koi v6\H»y Sircp tvioi iroiowrt rHy (rvyypap4vy ^oKofifidvoym kv irtwrl
vphs yv&viv Kol trcb^v^uuf odnortX\s cfvcu rovro rh fx^pos, OJfuu 8* M fiky
yrvpiCofi4tfwr r6Tmv oh fUKpd, fitydKa 8) W^t«c wphs h^dfun/itriif ^ r&y iroftdrwp
vapiB^civ M S) rSiv kytfooufidww us t4Xos 6ntUa9 lx<' ''^'^ S^rafur ^ r&0
ht^ofidrtty i^iiy^ffis rms ^topo^ots Ktd KpovafioTiKais A^(c<rty.
' Eren Liry (xxi. 38) notices the contradictory opinions and donbts of the
historians, and expresses his astonishment at them, as, in his opinion, the
question should be decided by the testimony of L. Cincius Alimentus, who
professed to have heard from Hannibal himself that, on descending from the
Alps, he came into the country of the Taun'ni — a statement in which all
historians agreed. But, in spite of Livy's confidence. Polybius makes a dififerent
statement. Moreover, the authority of Cincius is very questionable, as, in
giving the strength of Hannibal's army with which he crossed the Alps, he
includes the Gauls and Ligurians that joined him near the river Po.
' Hence the route by the Great St. Bernard and that by tbe Simplon are
altogether out of the question. The Great St. Bernard, it seems, would never
have been thought of if the Alps in that neighbourhood had not been called
the Pennine range. This name was supposed to be derived from the Pceni or
Carthaginians. By a similar etymological ingenuity, the Graian Alps were
said to be the locality where the Greek (Grains) Hercules crossed.
174 ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK more the universal opinion that Hannibal made use of the
.- / _. former of these two routes. This was the usual road by
which the Gallic tribes in the valley of the Po communi-
cated with their countrymen in Transalpine Graul. By
this pass alone they could obtain auxiliaries, as they often
did from beyond the Alps ; for the territory of the Salas-
sians, their friends and allies, extended to the foot of this
pass on the Italian side, whilst the Mont Cenis pass led
into the country of their enemies, the Ligurian tribe of
the Taurini.^ The guides whom the Insubrians had sent
to Hannibal, and who had promised to conduct him by a
safe road, could not possibly advise him to take the road
of Mont Cenis. It seems therefore highly probable that
Hannibal marched over the pass of the Little St. Bernard.
But now another difficulty arises, viz., that of determining
by which road he reached this pass from the * Island ' of
the Allobrogians. The shortest and easiest way seems to
be that along the river Isere, which leads almost to the
foot of the pass. But the distances given by Polybius are
at variance with this route ;* and, moreover, when he says
that Hannibal marched ^ along the river,* he can only
have meant the Rhone,' and not the Isere. It seems
therefore the most probable view, that Hannibal followed
the course of the Ehone, avoiding, however, the sharp
' Polybius, iii. 44, § 7.
• Polybius, iii. 61, § 1. The 800 stadia to the ascent of the Alps, it
appears, must be computed from the point where, after a four days' march
along the Khone (iii. 49, § 5), Hannibal reached the ' Island ; ' and this agrees
with the statement (iii. 39, § 9) which makes the distance between the place
of crossing the Bhone to the ascent of the Alps to be 1,400 stadia. If
Hannibal had marched along the Isere, the 800 stadia would have taken him
considerably beyond Grenoble ; and yet this is the only place where he could
find the ^wrx^picu mentioned by Polybius as favouring the attacks of the
mountaineers.
■ This expression iraph rhv T0Tafi6v must, however, not be taken literally,
as the Rhone makes a sharp angle at Lyons, which Hannibal no doubt cut off;
but it is, on the whole, not inappropriate — at least, not more so than the com-
parison of the * Island ' with a triangle similar to the Egyptian Delta. If
Polybius had only taken the trouble to designate the spot where Hannibal
left the valley of the Rhone, almost all doubts would have been removed. But
he says not a wozd about it. Compare above, p. 172, note 3.
THE SECOND PUNIC WAR. 175
bondings, until lie reached the spot where the mountains CHAP,
of Savoy (the Mont du Chat) approach the river — that he .^ , '_.
crossed this chain of mountainsy and marched past the pre- xZ^f^
sent town of Chambery in a southern direction until he 218-216
reached the Isere again at Montmelian, and followed its ^'^'
course to the foot of the Little St. Bernard.^
For ten days the army marched over level ground Hostility
without encountering any difficulty. The AUobrogian xnoim-
chiefs, who, as it seems, were not averse to plunder, dreaded taineers.
the cavalry of Hannibal and his Gaulish escort. But
when the latter had returned home, and Hannibal entered
the defiles of the mountains, he found the road blocked up
by the mountaineers in a place where force could avail
nothing.^ He was informed by his guides that the enemy
were accustomed to keep the heights guarded only by day,
and to retire in the night to their neighbouring town. He
therefore caused his light-armed troops to occupy the pass
in the night. The attacks of the barbarians, who returned
on the following day and harassed the slowly advancing
long line of march, were repulsed without much difficulty.
Yet Hannibal lost a number of beasts of burden and a good
deal of his baggage, the latter being no doubt the principal
object of the barbarians. Fortunately many of the animals
and some prisoners were recovered in the town which lay
near the pass, and which contained also provisions for a
few days.'
> This Tiew is supported by Cramer and Wickbam {Dissertation on the
Passage of Hannibal over the AlpSt 1820), and lately again confirmed by
W. J. Law {Quarterly Review^ vol. czxiii. art. 8). The only doubt suggested
by this theory is the crossing by Hannibal of the Mont dn Chat near Cheyeln.
On this road Hannibal would have passed by the Lake of Bourget. Is it
likely that Polybius would not have mentioned this lake? This difiSculty
would be lemoved if we might suppose that Hannibal reached the mountains
and the first hwrxj^picu at the town of Les Echelles. But I am not aware
whether in that locality there is a road practicable for horses and elephants.
* This locality was, according to Cramer and Wickham, in the Chevelu Pass
over the Mont du Chat.
' Polybius does not mention its name ; and, if he had been able or willing
to do so, it would have been to his readers one of the hliw6ni\joi kcX KpowyMn-
icol Xi^M (iii. 36, % 3), i.«. gibberish ; they would not have been any the
wiser. If Hannibal's march went over the Mont du Chat, the town was the
176 EOMAN HISTORY.
BOOK Having given his troops one day of rest, Hannibal con-
. • - tinned his marcli. On the fourth day the natives met him
Treachery ^^^ branches of trees in their hands as a sign of friend-
of the liness, and requested him to march through their land
without doing them any injury. They brought cattle, and
offered hostages as proofs of their sincerity. Hannibal
suspected that all these signs of devotion were insincere,
and intended to lull him into security. Therefore, though
he accepted their offers, he provided against treachery,
sent his baggage and cavalry in advance, and covered the
march with his infantry. Thus the cumbersome portion
of the army passed through the most difficult places, and
was in tolerable security, when, on the third day, the faith-
less barbarians rushed to the attack, rolled and threw
stones from both sides of the narrow pass, and killed a
great number of men and animals. Hannibal was com-
pelled to spend a night away from his baggage and
cavalrv.^ But this was the last time that the mountaineers
seriously attempted to obstruct his march. From this
time forward they ventured only on isolated acts of
plunder, and soon afber Hannibal reached the summit
of the pass, on the ninth day afber he had commenced the
ascent.
Descent of It was now nearly the end of October, and the ground
^** was already covered with fresh fallen snow.* No wonder
that the men born under the burning sun of Africa, or in
the genial climate of Spain, felt their hearts sink within
them in those chill and dreary regions, when they mea-
sured the hardships that still awaited them with those
which they had endured.' Hannibal endeavoured to raise
present Bourget ; if it went by Les Echelles, it was Chambery ; whereas, if
Hannibal followed all along the Isere, it was Cularo, afterwards <»Ued
G-ratianopolis. now Grenoble.
* Polybius, iii. 63, { 6 : irepf tj XcvK^crpof hx^v. Whether this was a
vnihiU Tock^ the Roche Blanche, which is at the foot of the pass over the
Little St Bernard, or whether it is simply an ordinary bare rock, I dare not
decide.
■ Polybius, iii. 64, § 1.
' Polybius, loc. cit. : rit rkii$7i 9v<r$6ftMS 9uucttfi9va ical Si& i^y irpo7t7cin|fi^inf»
raXcuwmpituf kcU itik r^p In vpoo9oKWfi4imiy.
THE SECOND PUNIC WAE.
177
their courage by directing their eyes towards Italy, which
lay expanded at their feet like a promised land, the goal
of their hopes and the reward of their perseverance. Then,
after a rest of two days, the downward march began. This
was no further molested by any hostile attack ; but the
obstacles which nature presented were greater. The snow
covered dangerous places, and, breaking under the feet of
the men, hurled many into precipices. One portion of the
road had been made impassable, and was partly broken
away, by avalanches. In the attempt to pass by a side-way
over a glacier,* the tramp of the army soon reduced the
recent snow to a slush, and on the ice which was under the
snow the men slipped, whilst the horses broke through with
their hoofs and remained fixed in it. Hannibal was obliged
to halt, and to repair the broken part of the road.* The
whole army was set to work, and thus one day sufficed
to restore the road sufficiently for horses and beasts of
burden to pass. But three more days passed before the
Nuinidians succeeded in making the road broad and firm
enough for the elephants. When at length this last
obstacle was overcome, the army passed from the region
of snow into the lower and gentler slopes, and in three
more days it encamped at the foot of the Alps.
Thus, at length, Hannibal accomplished his task, but at
a cost which made it doubtful whether it would not have
been wiser never to have undertaken it. Of the 59,000
chosen warriors who had marched from Spain, not less
than 33,000 had been carried oflF by disease, fatigue, or
the sword of the enemy. Only 12,000 Libyan and 8,000
* What Polybius dcacribes (iii. 65) appears to have been nothing but a
glacier. Whether a glacier exists, or formerly existed, in the vicinity of the
pass, and in what locality, is a question to be decided by members of an
Alpine Club.
' On this occasion the rocks, according to Livy (xxi. 37), were softened by
fire and vinegar. What are we to think of such a story, which looks almost
like a joke ? The effect of vinegar on heated rocks may be tried by experiment ;
but even if it should turn out to be what Livy says, how are we to imagine
Hannibal in possession of such a quantity of vinegar? Nor can it have been
easy to obtain trunks of trees (arboribus circa immanibus deiectis detnm-
catisque) in the region of snow and ice.
VOL. II. N
CHAP.
vm.
First
Period,
218-216
B.C.
Condition
ofHan* .
nibal's
army.
178 ROMAIC HISTORY.
BOOK Spiwish foot and 6,000 horsemen had reached the spot
>, , ■ ' where the real struggle was not to end, but to begin.
And these men were in a condition that might have in-
spired even enemies with pity. Countless suflferings,
miseries, wounds, hunger, cold, disease had deprived them
almost of the appearance of human beings, and had bruta-
Used them in body and mind.^ With our admiration of
Hannibal's genius mingles an involuntary astonishment
that he thought the object which he had gained worthy
of such a price, and that, in spite of his losses, he was able
to justify the wisdom of his determination by the most
brilliant success. It is not easy to banish the suspicion
that Hannibal anticipated less difficulty in the passage of
the Alps than he encountered. Though the attacks of
the mountaineers were probably not so serious as they are
represented, yet they added materially to the losses of the
army.* No doubt Hannibal was justified in expecting
that these tribes would receive him as the friend and ally
of their countrymen on the Po, and we may suppose that
they had formally promised to assist instead of obstructing
the passage. We are at a loss to account for their hos-
tility. Perhaps their only object was plunder. The ob-
structions thus caused were the more serious as Hannibal
was too late in the season for crossing the mountains easily.
But it is impossible to determine the cause of this delay
— whether Hannibal's departure from New Carthage was
postponed unduly ; whether the campaign between the
Ebro and the Pyrenees, or the passage of these mountains,
or the march through Gaul, or the crossing of the Ehone
and the transactions with the Allobrogians detained him
longer than he had calculated; or whether, in spite of
all his inquiries, he had no correct knowledge of the
distances and the difficulties of the road. But there
can be no doubt that the cold, added to the fatigue of
' Polybius, ill. 60, { 6 : Of -yf fiV fru04n^f ited reus ^upw^iws itol Tp Aocv^
• Polybius, iii. 60, §{ 3, 4.
THE SECOND PUNIC WAR. 179
mountain-climbing among ice and snow, was more per- CHAP,
nicious to bis men tban anything else. A march of
fifteen days under the weight of arms and baggage, p^^^
oyer the highest and steepest mountains of Europe, and 218-216
on such roads as the tramp of men and animals alone, ^*^*
without any engineering skill, had made, and fifteen
nights' bivouac where even in October piercing cold winds
sweep down from the snow-fields and glaciers, were alone
sufficient to destroy an army. What must have been the
fate of those who fell down fi:om exhaustion, or were left
behind wounded or diseased ? Nothing is said in this nar-
rative (and very rarely at any other time in the accounts
of ancient warfare) of the sick and wounded. No doubt
every serious woand or illness caused death, especially on
a march where even vigorous men experience difficulty in
keeping pace with their comrades. Becent events have
shown that the care of the sick and wounded in war is a
very late and a very imperfect product of civilisation and
philanthrophy.
The army required a few days to recover from their Hannibal
fatigue before Hannibal could venture to begin the cam- 55^.*
paign, at a season when, under ordinary circumstances, nians.
the time for winter-quarters had arrived. He then turned
against the Taurinians, a Ligurian tribe which was hostile
to the Insubrians, and had rejected his proffered alliance.'
In three days their chief town was taken, their fighting
men cut down,^ and it was made evident t*o all their neigh-
bours that they had only to choose between destruction and
the Carthaginian alliance. In consequence of this, all the
tribes in the upper valley of the Po, Ligurians as
well as Gauls, joined Hannibal. The tribes living further
eastward still hesitated, from fear of the Soman armies
that occupied their country.' Hannibal, in order to
enable them to join him, found it necessary to march
' According to Appian, Tiii. 6 : robs cdxiiak^ovs iff^a^w is KoriMXri^iy rtis
* PolybioB, iii. 60, § 12 : rufh M koI (rwrrpar^of ^trayKdCorro rois *P»fudois,
N 2
180 ROMAX HISTORY.
BOOK immediatelj against the Bomans, and to force them to
^ / ^ accept a battle.
Alleged We may presume that it was hardly necessary for
Hannibal Hannibal to urge his soldiers to bravery. Their conduct
for the en- up to this time was a sufficient guarantee for the future.
mAt of'his Nevertheless, as we are told,* Hannibal placed before their
Boldieps. QjQQ ^ spectacle to show that death has no terrors for a
man if death or victory is the only chance of deliverance
from unendurable evils. Before the assembled army he
asked his Gallic prisoners if they were prepared to fight
with one another unto the death, provided that liberty and
splendid arms were the reward of victory. When with
one voice they all professed themselves ready to stake life
for freedom, Hannibal selected by lot several pairs of
combatants. These fought, fell or conquered like heroes,
and were envied by those of their companions who had not
been fortunate enough to be selected. Thus wretched
barbarian captives showed what can be expected of soldiers
fighting for the highest prize, and Hannibal's men were
not disposed to yield to them in military spirit.
March and It would almost appear that the issue of the first Punic
Scipio. war had produced among the Romans a feeling of supe-
riority over the Carthaginians. They had no conception
of the change that had taken place in the Carthaginian
• army, and that, instead of Gallic mercenaries, Libyan and
Spanish subjects and allies formed now the principal
strength of their old enemies. Of course they were still
more ignorant of the military genius of Hannibal. They
were consequently full of courage and confident of victory ;
and Scipio, as he had ventured in Gaul to advance against
Hannibal with an inferior force, did not hesitate now to
do the same. Prom Placentia he marched westward along
the left bank of the Po, crossed the Ticinus, and found
himself suddenly face to face with a considerable corps of
cavalry, which Hannibal, advancing on the same bank
down the river, had sent before the main body of his army
> PolybinB, iii. 62. Dion Cassias, fr. 67, 4. Li>7, zxi. 42.
THE SECOND PUNIC WAE. 181
to reconnoitre. Thus the first encounter on Italian soil CHAP,
took place between the Po and the Ticinns. It did not > — , *^
assume the dimensions of a battle. No Eoman infantry, p^^^
except the light-armed troops, were engaged ; but the 218-216
conflict was severe, and terminated, after a spirited resist* ^'^'
ance, in a decided repulse of the Romans. Scipio himself
set his men the example of bravery. Fighting in the
foremost ranks, he was wounded, and owed his life to the
heroism of his son, then a youth of seventeen years, but
destined to become the conqueror of Hannibal, and to
terminate the terrible war so inauspiciously opened at
the Ticinus.* After this check, Scipio- could not think of
venturing on a regular battle. The level country round
about was too favourable for the superior cavalry of the
Carthaginians. He made therefore a hasty and even pre*
cipitate retreat, sacrificing a detachment of 600 men, who
covered the bridge over the Po until it was destroyed by
the retreating army, and, less fortunate than Horatius
Codes in the good old time, were all made prisoners of
war.
In order to cross the Po, Hannibal was obliged to Passage of
ascend its bank for some distance, until he found a place
where the elephants and the cavalry could swim the stream,
and where it was easy to construct a bridge for the in-
fantry. Then he advanced towards Placentia, near which
city the consul Scipio had constructed a fortified camp.
He crossed, as it appears, the small river Trebia, which,
running down from the Apennines in a northerly direc-
tion, joins the Po not far to the west of Placentia. Thus
the two armies again confronted one another, and Han-
nibal was anxious to bring on a decisive engagement,
whilst Scipio, moderating his ardour after his recent
ill success, and moreover compelled to inactivity by his
wound, kept within his lines. It was most fortunate for
the Romans that they had completed the fortification of
Placentia and Cremona. Without these two strongholds
* Polybiug,x. 3. Livy, xxi. 46. According to the account of Coelius, preserved
by Liyy {loc. cit.), Scipio*8 life was saTed by a Ligorian slave.
182 BOMAN HISTORY.
BOOK they would, after Hannibal's appearance, have been un-
•<s — r^ — ' able to keep their footing in the valley of the Po, and the
Ganls would have been throughout the war much less
hampered in their offensive operations as Hannibal's allies,
if the Boman garrisons in those two fortresses had not
kept them in constant alarm for the safety of their own
country.
Attitude of ^g y^-^ ^j^g Q-a^ils had not unanimously declared them-
tribes. selves for Hannibal. Most of them were ready to abandon
the cause of Kome, others wavered in their fidelity, a few
remained steadfast and sent auxiliaries. But Scipio could
not rely on these men. In one night more than 2,000 of
them mutinied in the Eoman camp, overpowered the
sentinels at the gates, and rushed out to join Hannibal.
They were received kindly, praised for their conduct, and
dismissed to their homes with great promises if they
would persuade their countrymen to revolt from Rome.
Hannibal was now in hopes that all the Gallic tribes
would join his standard, and he eagerly wished for an
opportunity to deal the Soman army a decisive blow,
which might inspire the Gauls with confidence in his
strength.
Move- Scipio, on his side, sought to avoid a conflict. As he
the Roman did not feel safe enough on the level ground, in the im-
TeTbank of ^^^^^^^ viciuity of Placentia, he broke up his camp in
the Trebia. the night, and, using the utmost silence, marched higher
up the Trebia, in order to gain a more favourable locality
for a camp on the hills which form the last spurs of the
Apennines running northward towards the Po. As Han-
nibal's army was not far off, this movement was no doubt
hazardous, especially as Scipio's march went past the hostile
camp. In spite of the care employed to avoid noise, the
movement of the Romans was perceived. Hannibal's horse-
men were immediately at their heels, and had they not
been delayed by the plunder of the Boman camp, it would
have been difficult for Scipio to reach, without great loss,
the left, or western, bank of the Trebia, and there to fortify
a new camp. As it was, he succeeded in gaining a strong
THE. SECOND PUNIC WAR. 18S
position, where he was in perfect safety, and was able to CHAP,
await the arrival of his colleague Sempronius, who, with ^ . ^'_-
his army, was on his way from Sicily, i^"^
As we have seen above, Sempronius had, in the early 218-216
part of the summer, sailed with two legions to Sicily. ^'^'
Tn that province he had made preparations for a landing ^F^tions
n Africa, but had been detained by the energy with which nius in
he Carthaginians had begun hostilities in that quarter. ^^^^' .
Even before his arrival, a Carthaginian squadron of
twenty vessels of war had appeared in the Sicilian waters.
Three of them had been driven by a storm into the Straits
of Messana, and had been captured by the Syracusan
fleet with which the old king Hiero was in readiness to
join the Boman consul. From the prisoners, Hiero ascer-
tained that a Carthaginian fleet was on its way to surprise
Lilybseum and to promote a rising of the Boman subjects
in Sicily, many of whom regretted the change of masters,
and would fain have returned to their old allegianoe. This
important news was at once communicated to the preetor,
M. ^milius, who at that time commanded in Sicily;
the garrison of Lilybseum was warned, and the Boman
fleet kept in readiness, while all round the coast a strict
look-out was kept for the Carthaginians, and messengers
were dispatched into the several towns to enjoin vigilance.
Accordingly, when the Punic fleet, consisting of thirty-five
fsail, approached Lilybeeum, it found the Boman garrison
ready to receive it. There was no chance of taking the
town by surprise. The Carthaginians resolved, therefore, to
ofler battle to the Boman fleet, and drew up at the entrance
of the port. The number of the Boman ships is not given.
Livy ' only mentions the circumstance that they were
manned with better and more numerous troops than those
of the Carthaginians. The latter, therefore, tried to avoid
being boarded, and relied on their skill in using the
beaks (rostra) for disabling and sinking the hostile vessels.
But they succeeded only in a single instance, whereas
' Livy, xxi. 49.
184 ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK the Boraans boarded several of their vessels, and captured
. — rL^ them, with their crews, amounting to 1,700 men. The
rest of the Carthaginian ships escaped. Again it was
shown that the sea, their own peculiar element, had
become unfavourable to the Carthaginians; whilst, on
the other hand, the genius of Hannibal had the effect of
reversing the relative strength and confidence of the two
nations in their land forces, and of causing the superiority
of the Boman legions over the Carthaginian mercenaries
to be forgotten.
Zeal of Meanwhile, Tiberius Sempronius had arrived in Sicily
Hiero. with his fleet of one hundred and sixty sail and two
legions, and had been received by King Hiero with the
respect due to the representative of the majesty of Some.
Hiero placed his fleet at the disposal of the consul, offered
him his homage and his vows for the triumph of the
Boman people, and promised to show himself in his old
age as faithful and persevering in the service of the
Boman people as he had been in the former war, when
he was in the vigour of manhood. He promised to provide
the Boman legions and crews, at his own expense, with
clothing and provisions, and then reported on the con-
dition of the island and the plans of the Carthaginians.
The two fleets sailed in company to Lilybaeum. They
found there that the design of the Carthaginians on
Lilybseum had failed, and that the town was safe. Hiero
therefore returned with his fleet to Syracuse ; Sempronius
sailed to Malta, which the Carthaginian commander
Hamilcar, the son of Gisgo, surrendered with the garrison
of 2,000 men. These prisoners, as well as the men cap-
tured in the engagement off Lilybaeum, were sold as slaves,
with the exception of three noble Carthaginians. Sem-
pronius then sailed in search of the hostile fleet, which,
meanwhile, committed depredations in the Italian waters,
and which he thought to find among the Liparian Islands.
He was mistaken, and on his return to Sicily received infor-
mation that it was ravaging the coast of Italy near Vibo.
But his further action in the south was stopped by the
THE SECOND PUNIC WAR. 185
news, which arrived soon after, of Hannibal's march across CHAP.
'w-r VTTT
the Alps.' He prepared immediately to join his col- ^, , 1 .
league Scipio in Cisalpine Gaul. Placing twenty-five j^^^
ships under the command of his legate Sextus Pomponius 218-216
for the protection of the Italian coast, and reinforcing the ^'^'
squadron of the prsetor M. ^milius to fifty sail, he sent
the remainder of his fieet with his troops to Ariminum in
the Adriatic. Having regulated affairs in Sicily, he fol-
lowed the main body with ten ships. The rest of his
army which could not be taken on board the fleet he
ordered to proceed to Ariminum by land, leaving every
soldier free to find his way as best he could, and only
bindmg them bjr oath to appeor at Arimm^m on the
From Anminum Sempronius marched to the Trebia, Junction of
where he effected his junction with Scipio, apparently ^Z^^l),
without difficulty.* The Boman army now amounted to Scipio.
' Probably this news and the order of the senate to leave Sicily were
dispatched from Rome as soon as Scipio had reported his encounter with the
Carthaginian cavalry hear Hassilia. When Scipio resolved to send his own •
legions to Spain, it was natural that he should wish to have in their place the
Sicilian legions of Sempronius for joint operations against Hannibal on the
Po. If the news reached Sicily about the beginning of November, Sempronius
had just time to be in Ariminum about the middle of December.
* Polybius (iii. 61) and Livy (xxi. 61) give contradictory statementa concern-
ing the mode of transporting the army from Sicily to Cisalpine Gaul. The
former relates that the soldiers proceeded all the way by land ; the latter speaks
only of their conveyance on board the fleet. Both writers are most positive and
distinct in their statements, so that they must have spoken on authority, and
cannot be supposed to have indulged in unfounded conjectures. The authority
of Polybius is very high ; yet he is not free from errors and omissions. He
touches but slightly on the events in Sicily in the year 218. We owe our
knowledge of them to Livy, who must have followed a well-informed witness.
His statement is borne out by the reflection that we cannot understand why
Sempronius should not have made use of the ships, nearly one hundred in
number (Livy, xxi. 17) — which he did not leave in Sicily— for the purpose of
conveying his troops without fatigue to Ariminum. Perhaps his ships did not
suffice to carry all the men, and a portion of them were obliged to march on
foot through the whole length of Italy, as we have assumed in the t«xt.
' It is strange that he accomplished this without any opposition on the
part of Hannibal. The road from Ariminum to the Trebia traverses an
uninterrupted plain, and must, in the Ticinity of Placentia, have approached
very near the Carthaginian camp. This circumstance has given rise to the
conjecture, that Hannibal*8 camp was on tlie western side of the Trebia, and
186 ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK more than 40,000 men,* and was consequentlj more
/ ^ numerons tlian that of the invaders. But the position of
Hannibal was now very much improved. Bj the .treason
of a Latin officer from Brundusium, he had gained posses-
sion of the fortified place of Clastidium (now called
CasteggiOy near Montebello), where the Romans had col-
lected their supplies. Thus he had now abundance of
provisions, whilst the Soman army, swelled by the arrival
of Sempronius to double its original number, felt, no
doubt, most keenly the loss of the supplies which had
been destined for its use. Under these circumstances,
Sempronius naturally wished to bring on a battle. He
had not come all the way from Sicily to shut himself up
in a fortified camp on the Trebia, and to look on quietly,
whilst tribe after tribe in Cisalpine Graul joined Hannibal,
and swelled the hostile army. He might well ask for
what purpose two consular armies were sent out against
the enemy, except to attack and defeat him.^ He had
been successful in his own province of Sicily, and had
been crossed and thwarted in a direct attack on Carthage
by the order of the senate, which recalled him and trans-
ferred him to the north of Italy. If he should be so
fortunate as to destroy Hannibal's army, he would have
the glory of having quickly brought the war to a triumphant
conclusion. Nor would he share this glory with anybody,
as, while his colleague Scipio was disabled by his wound,
coneeqaently that of Scipio on the eastern, contrary to the statement of
Polybins (see below, p. IStl, note 2). Bat the difficulty is not removed by this
unjustified assumption. The Trebia offered no obstacle to the hostile cavalry.
Even when it was swollen high by sudden rain in the night before the battle,
which took place soon after, the Roman infantry were able to wade through it.
Supposing, therefore, that Hannibal had been stationed on the left bank of
that river, he would yet have been able, even there, to obtain information of the
march of Sempronius, and to advance to meet him before his junction with
Scipio. Our sources give no explanation of the unmolested junction of the
two Roman armies. Perhaps we may venture on the supposition that it waa
effected whilst Hannibal was engaged with the capture of Clastidium, several
miles westward of the Trebia.
> Polybius, iii. 72, { H* According to Livy (xxi. 65), 18,000 Romans,
20,000 allies, 4,000 horse, and, besides, Cenomanian auxiliaries,
' Compare Livy, xxi. 52 init
THE SECOND PUNIC WAR. 187
he had the undivided command of the two consular CHAP,
armies. Polybins, refusing to regard the resolution of ^^' ■
Sempronius as the result of rational calculation, or of the _^^^^
. ... . . Prriod,
necessity of his position^ charges him with recklessness 218-216
and vanity/ contrasting with his conduct the prudent ^'^'
caution of Scipio, who is said to have dissuaded him from
risking a battle. We can hardly decide whether Polybius is
right or wrong. It is possible that Sempronins, just like
Scipio at first, had no just estimation of the enemy with
whom he had to deal, and that, thinking victory certain, he
was over anxious to secure the glory for himself. At the
same time it is tolerably evident that Polybius, in his
partiality to Scipio, endeavours as much as possible to
throw upon the shoulders of Sempronius the blame of
the defeat on the Trebia. He was the friend of the
Cornelian house, and could not but imbibe in the family
circle of the Scipios all the views most in accordance with
the reputation of that family, views which he has done
his best to propagate and to back by his authority.
The two hostile armies were encamped at a short distance Prepan-
from one another; the Carthaginians nearer to Placentia, Jl^^^^J^^
on the right, or eastern, bank of the Trebia, the Romans of the
higher up the river, on the left bank. A cavalry engage-
ment took place, and, terminating apparently to the
advantage of the Romans, had increased the confidence
of Sempronius. This Hannibal had expected. He knew
that the Bomans would not defer the decision much
longer,* chose his battle-field with the unerring eye of a
consummate general, and made all the necessary prepara-
tions for the impending struggle.
Not far from the Roman camp, but on the opposite side Tactics of
of the Trebia, was a dried-up watercourse with high banks ^*°°^^*i-
overgrown with bushes, high enough to hide infantry and
even cavalry. Here Hannibal ordered his spirited young
brother Mago * to proceed before daybreak with one
' Polybius, iii. 70, { 7 : ^^ rris <pt\oio^las iXttvydfiwos koX icarairi<rrc^«y roh
wpdyfuuri xapa?ii6yws ItnrevSc Kpiycu 8<' aOrov t& t\a fc.r.X.
• Polybius, iii. 70, § 13.
' Polybius, iii. 71) § 6: 6rra viov ijl\p 6pfijjs 9^ vA^pi? ica2 watZofuiBri vrpl t&
W0\9fUKd,
188
ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK
IV.
Defeat of
the
Romans.
tlionsand chosen horsemen and as many foot soldiers, and
to lie in ambush until the signal should be given. Then
he sent the Numidian cavalr j across the river right against
the Boman camp to draw them out to battle. What he
had expected took place. As soon as the Bomans,
early in the morning, caught sight of the Numidians,
Sempronius, without even giving his men time to
strengthen themselves by the usual morning meal, ordered
the whole of his cavalry, four thousand strong, to advance
against them, and the foot to follow. The Numidians
retired back across the river, closely pursued by the
Roman cavalry and infantry. The day was raw, damp,
and cold. It was towards mid-winter, and sleet and snow
filled the air. In the previous night a copious rain had
fallen in the mountains, and the river Trebia had risen so
high that the soldiers in fording it stood breast high in
the icy water. Stiff with cold and faint with hunger they
arrived on the right bank, and immediately found them-
selves in front of Hannibal's army, which was drawn up in
a long line of batfcle, the infantry, 20,000 strong, in the
centre, 10,000 horsemen and the elephants on the wings*
Hannibal had taken care that his men should have a good
night's rest, and be prepared for the work of the day by
an ample breakfast.
The battle had hardly begun when the Romans lost
every chance of victory. The superior Carthaginian
cavalry drove in the Roman cavalry on both wings, and, in
combination with the elephants, attacked the legions on
the flanks whilst Hannibal's Libyan, Spanish, and Gaulish
infantry engaged them in front. Nevertheless, the
Romans kept their ground for a while with the utmost
courage, until Mago-, with his two thousand men, brokp
lorth from the ambush and seized them in rear. Terror
and disorder now spread among them. Only ten thousand
men in the centre of the Roman line kept their ranks
unbroken, and, cutting their way through the Gauls
opposed to them, made good their retreat to Placentia j the
THE SECOND PUNIC WAR.
189
remainder of the Boman infantry, in helpless confdsion,
tried to regain their camp on the western side of the
Trebia. But before they could cross the river the greater
porti<vi were cut down by the numerous cavalry of the
Carthaginians, or perished under the feet of the elephants.
Many found their death in the river, which with its
BwoUen and icy flood cut oflP their retreat. Some reached
the camp; others, especially the horse which had been
chased off the field on both flanks, joined the corps of ten
thousand which alone effected an orderly retreat to Pla-
centia. The pursuit lasted until showers of rain mixed
with snow compelled the conquerors to seek the shelter of
their tents. The weather was so bitterly cold and tem-
pestuous that Hannibal's army suffered severely, and
almost all^ the elephants perished.^
The tempest continued to rage all night. Under its
cover Scipio succeeded in crossing the river Trebia with
the remnants of the defeated army, and in reaching Pla-
centia unmolested by the victorious but exhausted Car-
thaginians.^ In this town and in Cremona, under the
* According to Polybius (iii. 74, § 11), only one elephant surviTed ; according
to Livy (xxi. 58), Hannibal had, at a subsequent period, more than seven left.
* It is slraage that doubts could arise whether the battle was fought on
the right or on the left bank of the Trebia. The narrative of Polybius points
distinctly to the right bank, and that of Livy is quite unintelligible under any
other supposition. (Compare especially Polybius, iii. 66, § 9 ; iii. 67, § 9 ; iii. 68,
§ 5 ; Livy, xxi. 65). Mommsen {Rom. Gesch. i. 599 ; English translation, ii. 117)
maintains that the battle took place on the left bank of the Trebia, but his argu-
ments are untenable, as shown by Peter {Siudien zur rom. Gesch. p. 35 ff.). The
piBsibility of a doubt is a proof of our remark above (p. 172), that the ancient
writers are deficient in accuracy in their geographical and topogi'aphical descrip-
tions. If modern writers (like Rospatt, Fddzuge des Hannibal^ p. 14) sim ply-
reject the statement of Polybius, because in their opinion it is inconsistent with
strategical laws, they are guilty of an unjustifiable disregard of authority.
We fully agree with a remark of Arnold {Hist, of Rome, iii. p. 96) : ' It is not
explained by any existing writer how Sempronius was able to effect his
Junction with his colleague without any opposition from Hannibal.' This
is the reason for the assumption that Scipio's camp must have been on the
right bank of the Trebia (see above, p. 1 85, note 3). ' But so much in war depends
upon trifling accident*, that it is vain to guess where we are without information.'
' This circumstance is mentioned by Livy (xxi. 56), and is in itself sufficient
to show that the Roman camp was not on the right side of the Trebia, on
which Placentia lay, but on the left.
CHAP.
VIU.
. '
FiBST
Pkbiod,
218-216
B.C.
Retreat of
Scipio to
Placentia.
190
ROMAN mSTORY.
BOOK
IV.
Success
and
ability of
Hannibal.
Effects of
Hannibal's
victory.
shelter of the recently constructed fortifications, the
' shattered remains of the four legions passed the rest of
the winter in safety. The supplies from the surrounding
country were cut ofif, as the Gauls had by this tim« risen
in mass against Borne, and as HannibaFs cavalry ranged
freely all over the vast plain about the Po. But the
navigation of this river, it seems, was still open. The
fishing boats of the natives coald not stop the armed
vessels of the Romans, and thus the Koman colonists and
soldiers received the necessary supplies, and were enabled
to hold their ground at this most critical period.
The great battle of the Trebia was the concluding and
crowning operation of Hannibal's campaign, the reward
for the innumerable labours and dangers which he and
his brave army had encountered. The march from New
Carthage to Placentia across the Ebro, the Pyrenees, the
Bhone, the Alps, and the Po, in great part through
hostile nations, and on wretched roads, with an army
composed of different races, and inspired by no feeling of
patriotic devotion, is not matched by any military exploit
in ancient or in modem history. But that which raises it
above the sphere of mere adventurous daring, and qualifies
it as an achievement worthy of a great general, is the
splendid victory with which it closed.
This victory produced the most importaht results. Even
the immediate and direct gain was great. The two con-
sular armies were shattered. The number of the slain
and the prisoners is not stated, but we can hardly suppose
it to have been less than half of the whole army engaged.
Still greater was the moral eflfect. From this time forward
the name of Hannibal was terrible to the Boman soldier,
just as the name of the Gauls had been of old. And these
two * most terrible enemies of Bome were now united,
flushed with victory and ready to turn their arms against
the devoted city. The dreadful calamity which came
upon the republic after the black day of the Allia might
now not only be repeated but surpassed. At that time
the Capitol at least had broken the onset of the barbarians^
THE SECOND PUMO WAR. 191
and had saved the Boman nation from extinction. But CHAP,
what chance was there now of resisting the man who, ^_ . '_■
with ' but small support from the Gallic tribes, had de- p^^^^
stroyed a superior Boman army, and was now leading all 218-216
the hereditary enemies of the Boman name against the ^'^'
city? To face such dangers, without despairing, the
Bomans required all the iron firmness of their character,
which never was more formidable than when veritable
terrors appeared on all sides.*
Such firmness was the more necessary as Hannibal, at Hannibars
this early period of the war, showed that it was his inten- o7hir^"
tion to undermine the Boman state within, whilst he was prisoners.
attacking it from without. After his victory on the Trebia,
he divided his prisoners into two classes. Those who
were Boman citizens he kept in rigorous captivity. The
Boman allies he dismissed without ransom, and assured
them that he had come into Italy in order to deliver
them from the Boman yoke. If they wished to recover
their independence, their lost lands and towns, they
should join him, and with united strength attack the
common enemy of them all.*
In spite of the advanced season, and the severity of the Winter
winter, Hannibal showed a restless activity. He was of Han- °^
busied in organising the alliance of the Gaulish tribes °'^^
against Bome. The Boians brought him, as a pledge of
their fidelity, the three Boman commissioners' whom
they had captured. He was joined also by the Ligurians,
who had year after year been hunted and harassed by the
Bomans like wild beasts, and who brought as hostages
some noble Bomans whom they had captured in their
country.* Still the Bomans held several fortified places
on the Po. One of these, called Victumvise, was stormed
' Polybius, iii. 75, § 8 : t<(tc 7^ (pofitp^an'oi "Pufuuoi Kcd Koivy jroi icar*
iSW, trav ohrobs yrepiffr^ tp6fios iiX,riBw6s.
• Polybius, iii. 77. The testimony of Polybiua suffices to prore that the
statement of Zonaras (viii. 24), that Hannibal caused the Boman prisoners to
be put to death, is a falsification of history due to the national hatred of
Roman patriots.
' See above, p, 167. * Livy, xxi. OS*
192 KOMAN HISTORY.
BOOK by Hannibal, and the defenders were treated witb all the
-_ ,• ^ severity of the laws of war ; ' the attempt to take another
fort bj surprise faUed. The two principal places, Placentia
and Cremona, could not be taken without a formal siege ;
for besides the remains of the beaten army, each of them
had a garrison of six thousand colonists, i.e. veteran
soldiers. For such an attempt Hannibal had neither time
nor means. He was hastening to carry the war into
Southern Italy. The Gauls began to feel the pressure of
the numbers which they had now to support, and they were
burning with impatience for the plunder of Italy. The
fundamental feature of their character was inconstancy.*
They had no idea of fidelity and perseverance. It was
nothing but their own advantage that united them with
Hannibal. Their attachment could easily be changed into
hostility. Hannibal's own life might be exposed to danger
if the- treacherous disposition of these barbarians were
stimulated by a prize oflPered for his head. His brother-
in-law, Hasdrubal, had fallen a victim to assassination.
Alexander of Epirus had been killed by a faithless Luca-
nian ally.' It was not impossible that a similar fate
awaited HannibaL If we can trust the report of Polybius,
such apprehensions induced Hannibal to avail himself of a
* Punic deceit,' * by assuming different disguises and wear-
ing false hair, so that his own friends could not recognise
him. Tet we can hardly think such a device worthy of
Hannibal, nor does it seem probable that a general who
was worshipped by his soldiers should have been com-
pelled to hide himself under a disguise in the midst of his
army, in order to protect his life from the dagger of an
assassin. We should be rather inclined to think that
Hannibal acted as his own spy, to sound the disposition of
his new allies.
Unsuocess- In his impatience to leave Cisalpine Gaul, Hannibal
iuUttempt ^^^^ ^j^ attempt to cross the Apennines before the end
* Livy, xxi. 67. • oafffio,— Polybius, iii. 78, § 2.
* See vol. i. p. 380.
* PolybiuB, iii. 78, § 1 : *Zxp^^a>'''0 W rivi ico) ^ivikik^ aTpaTnyfifieiTt.
THE SECOND PUNIC WAR. 193
of Winter.* But he was foiled in this undertaking. The CHAP,
army was overtaken in the mountains by so terrific a . ^^^' -
hurricane that it was unable to proceed. Men and horses * ^'*^
perished from the cold, and Hannibal was compelled to 218-216
return to his winter-quarters near Placentia. ^^'
Simultaneously with the stirring events which accom- ^( ^°'
panied Hannibars march, Spain also had been the theatre cro8« the
of serious conflicts. Publius Scipio, as we have seen, had -^P®^'^'"®*-
sent from Massilia his brother Cneius with two legions to Operations
Spain, whilst he himself had hastened to the Po. In spite ^^ ®P*'°'
of its great distance, Spain was still Hannibal's only base
of operations ; and, by its natural wealth and its warlike
population, it was a chief source of strength for Carthage.
The Eomans therefore could not leave Spain in the uniSs-
turbed possession of their enemies, though they were
attacked in Italy itself. Moreover, their own interest as
well as their honour bound them to send assistance to
those Spanish tribes, between the Ebro and the Pyrenees,
who had espoused their cause in the great struggle between
the two rival republics. Hannibal had overthrown them
when he passed through their country on his march to
Italy, but he had not had time to reduce them to perfect
submission and peaceful obedience. It was still possible
to gain their alliance for Rome. The dispatch of the
two legions to Spain was, therefore, perfectly justified;
and the senate showed its approval of it by continuing the
war in Spain at all costs throughout the greatest distress
caused by Hannibal's victories in Italy. Spain was for
Eome what Cisalpine Gaul was for Hannibal. Both
countries had been recently and imperfectly conquered
and were full of unwilling subjects, easily roused to rebel-
lion. As the overthrow of Boman dominion in the north
of Italy opened a way for an attack on the vital parts of
her empire, so the conquest of Spain promised to facilitate
• Livy, xxi. 58 : * Ad prima ac dubia sigua yens profectus ex hibemis in
Etrariam ducit/ Polybius passes this over entirely.
• It was on this occasion that, according to Livy {loo, cii.), Hannibal lost
seven of the elephants which were left after the battle of the Trebia.
VOL. !!• 0
194 BOKAN mSTOBY.
BOOK a transfer of the war into Africa, where alone it conld be
\' ^ brought to a yictorions conclnsion*
Defeat of ^ ^^^ events in Spain during the year 218 B.C. we hare
Hanpo by not much to report. Cneios Scipio succeeded, by persua-
sion or force, in gaining for the Boman alliance most of
the tribes between the Pyrenees and the Ebro ; he defeated
Hanno, whom Hannibal had intrusted with ten thousand
men for the defence of that country, and he took up his
winter-quarters in Tarraco.
Alarm in The first news which reached Borne of the battle of the
Bome^on Trcbia was contained in an official report of the consul
the tidiiigB Scmprouius, which bears a striking resemblance to other
nibai^s official reports of very recent times. It stated, for the
tii^T^? information of the senate and the Boman people, that a
battle had taken place, and that Sempronius would have
been victorious if he had not been prevented by inclement
weather.' But soon there came reports which were not
official, and stated the naked truth. The alarm in Borne
was so much the greater, and it rose to positive apprehen-
sion for the safety of the town.* Since the great disaster
in the Caudine passes, more than a century before this time,
no similar calamity had befallen the imited legions of both
consuls ; and on that memorable occasion the army had
been saved from destruction by the short-sighted con-
fidence which the Samnite general had placed in the faith
and honour of the Boman people. It was only the battle
of the Allia which could compare in disastrous results with
the recent overthrow, for on that fatal day the army which
was destined to cover Borne had been completely routed
and dispersed ; and the memory of the terrors of that evil
time was now recalled the more readily as the dreaded
Gauls marched in Hannibal's army upon the ciiy which
they had once already burned and sacked. To the terror
of the foreign enemy were added apprehensions from
internal discord. After a long peace the struggle between
the two opposite parties had, a few years before, broken
1 Polybins, iiL 75, | 1: 8ri fidxn' ytyofidrtis rV t'^tn*' oMtr 6 x«1ft^
THE SECOND PUNIC WAB,
195
out again. The comitia of centuries had in 241 B.C. been
remodelled on democratic principles. Whilst the nobility
was degenerating more and more into a narrow oligarchy,
a popular party had been formed, bent on invigorating and
renewing the middle class, and on checking the accumu-
lation of wealth in a few hands. The chief of this party
was Cains Flaminius. He had in his tribuneship encoun-
tered the violent opposition of the senate in passing a law
for the division of public land in Pieenum amongst Boman
citizens ; ^ he had connected that country with Bome by
the Flaminianroad, a work by which, like Appius Claudius
with his road and aqueduct, he had given employment to
a great number of the poorer citizens, and had gained a
considerable following. The construction of a new race-
course in Bome, the Circus Maminius, was another measure
designed to conciliate the favour of the people. At the
same time these considerable public works are an evidence
of a stricter and growing control over the public revenue,
for the money which they required could not be derived
from any private or extraordinary source.' By such at-
tention to the finances of the state, Flaminius necessarily,
incurred the hostility of the rich and influential men of
the nobility, who were in the habit of deriving profit from
renting public domains, saltworks^ mines, and the like, and
from farming the customs. These men, from the nature of
their occupation, considered it their privilege to rob the
public. It had become quite customary for the nobility to
violate the Licinian law, to occupy more land and to keep
more cattle on the common pasture than the law allowed.
Occasionally honest and fearless, tribunes or sediles ven-
tured to put down this abuse by prosecuting and fining
the offenders ; but no radical cure was effected, nor was it
easy to effect one. Since the passing of the Licinian laws
(in 366 B.C.) Bome had conquered Italy, Sicily, and
' See aboTe, p. 126.
' Plutarch {Qua$t. Roman. 66) eoi\iecturefl that perhaps fl^minitu gaT«
land to the state, from the pzodace of which the expense was defrayed. This
is impossible. Perhaps Plutarch had read something of the reTeoues of public
land being devoted to the oljeet in question.
o 3
CHAP.
vm.
FiBST
Pkriod,
21S-216
B.C.
196 ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK Sardinia, and had confiscated conqaered lands on a large
^ , ' -> scale. How was it possible to coerce the rapacity of the
great and powerful families by enforcing a law which was
passed when Borne was not even mistress of the whole of
Latium? The great increase in the number of slaves,
which was one of the results of the wars in Southern Italy,
Sicily, Corsica, Liguria, and Illyria, made it possible to
farm large estates, and to keep numerous flocks and herds
on the extensive public pastures. The increase of capital
which flowed to Some from the conquered districts en-
riched the noble families, which monopolised the govern-
ment. When the first province was acquired beyond the
confines of Italy, the besetting sin of the Boman aris-
tocracy, their ungovernable rapacity, coupled with cruelty
and violence, shot up like a flame which has reached a
store of new, rich fiiel. The great danger that threatened
the Boman commonwealth became more than ever evident.
The lingering fever became more violent and malignant,
and it was high time for a vigorous hand to interfere and
to stop, if possible, the progress of the disorder. Flami-
nius, it appears, was the man for it ; but unfortunately he
was almost isolated among the Boman aristocracy. His
own father, it is said, pulled him down from the public
platform, when he was speaking to the people to recom-
mend his agrarian law ; and when the tribune C. Claudius,
who was probably a plebeian client of the great Claudian
family, proposed a law to prevent senators and the sons of
senators from engaging in foreign trade and from possessing
any vessels beyond a certain moderate size,' Maminius was
the only man in the senate who spoke in favour of the pro-
posal. He was therefore opposed by the whole of that
powerful party which monopolised the government for their
own benefit. But he had the people on his side ; and as at
that time the Assembly of the Tribes was independent and
competent to legislate for the whole republic, he was in a
position to carry his reforms by the votes of the people,
» LiTy, xxi. 68 : * Ne quis senator, cuive senator pater fuisset niaritimam
navem quae plus quam trecentarum amphorarum esset, babereU*
THE SECOND PUNIC WAR. 197
and in direct opposition to the senate. Had he lived chap.
longer, it is possible that the economical condition of the ^^'
Eoman people would not have become so utterly wretched J^'^**^
and hopeless as the Gracchi found it a hundred years later. 218-216
Flaminius had been raised to the consulship as early as ^^'
223 B.C. — a time when the war with the Insubrians was pPPJ«H®»
to Flami •
raging with all its force. He had no great military abili- nius.
ties ; but as a general he was probably not inferior to the
average of Boman consuls. It was therefore, in all proba-
bility, not from any apprehension of his incapacity, nor from
superstition caused by threatening phenomena, but from
political animosity, that the senate sent a message to recall
him to Bome, pretending that his election was vitiated by
some defect in the auspices, and calling upon him to resign
his office.' Flaminius had got into difficulties, but he was
just on the point of inflicting a severe blow on the enemy,*
when the sealed letter of the senate was delivered to him.
Guessing the contents, he left it unopened until he had
gained the victory. Then he answered that, as the gods
themselves had clearly fought for him, they had sufficiently
ratified his election ; and, thus setting the authority of the
senate at defiance, he continued the war. On his return
to Bome the people voted him a triumph, in spite of the
opposition of the senate, and when Flaminius had cele-
brated this triumph he laid down his office. In one of the
succeeding years he was made master of the horse by the
dictator Minucius, but was obliged to resign this command
because at his nomination a mouse had been heard to
squeak.' The nobility, as it appears, carried on against
him a sort of holy war. They marshalled heavenly signs
and auspices on their side ; but these weapons were evi-
dently becoming antiquated, for they produced very little
effect, as was shown in the sequel.
' Zonaras, viii. 20 : 9id re yovy rh ripvra ravra kqHL Sri rtvks irapei96fU9S
Ixryoy rohs 6wdrovs o/pct^veu, iirrinwfif^eof ainoCs. Poljbiiis does not mention
this undignified mancenvre of the nobility. Being an enlightened man, he was
probably ashamed to report such a thing of his friends. He also passes orer
the miracles that happened in 217. See below, p. 206.
' See abore, p. 134. ' Plntarch, Marcell. ii.
198
ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK
IV.
' 1
EfibrtB to
proYent the
re-election
of Flami-
nios.
Flaminius
elected
conaul.
When, after the defeat on the Trebia, the consular
elections for the ensuing year were at hand, and the
confidence of the people seemed to be turning in favour
of the popular leader Flaminius, as the first Boman
that had signally beaten the Gauls in their own country
beyond the Po, the oligarchical party worked hard to
prevent his election. Universal fear had seized the minds
of men, and made them see in every direction images of
terror, and miraculous phenomena of evil foreboding.
Livy ' has preserved an interesting list of these * prodigies,'
which illustrates the peculiar mode of superstition do-
minant at that time among the vulgar : — In the vegetable
market a child of six months called out ' Triumph ; ' in
the cattle market a bull ran up into the third story of a
house, and leaped into the street ; fiery ships were seen in
the sky ; the Temple of Hope was struck by lightning ; in
Lanuvium the holy spear moved of its own accord; a
raven flew into the temple of Juno, and perched on the
pillow of the goddess ; near Amitemum there were seen, in
many places, human forms in white robes ; in Picenum it
rained stones ; in Csere the prophetic tablets* shrank ; in Gaul
a wolf snatched the sword of a sentinel from its sheath.
To propitiate the anger of the gods, manifested by these
numerous signs, the whole people were for several days
engaged in sacrifices, purifications, and prayers. Dedicatory
offerings of gold and bronze were placed in the temples; lec-
tisternia, or public feastings of the gods,* were ordered, and
solemn vows were made on the part of the Boman people.
If the priests intended, in the interest of the nobility,
to keep the people by religious terrors from electing
Elaminius,^ who, as a notorious free-thinker, scoffed at
the national superstition, their pains were lost, for
» LiTj, xxi. 62.
* Livy, loc, cit. : ' Caere sortes extennatas.* These ' sortes ' were tablets or
stavfs of wood or other materials, with prophetic signs, letters, or words
engraved on them. Compare Cicero, Be Divinatione, ii. 41, 85; Lirj, xxii. 1.
* See Tol. i. p. 386.
* That such was indeed their intention is evident from the comparison of
Iheir former measures in the year 223 b.c. Compare especially Zonaras*
viu. 20.
B.C.
THE SECOND PUNIC WAB, 199
Flaminius was elected to tlie consulship in spite of all ^^^'
opposition. It was customary tliat the newly-elected »— ^
consul, on the day of entering on his ofSce, should dress Pbriod,
himself in his house in his ofScial robe (the praetexta or ^^^"^^^
purple-bordered toga), ascend the Capitol in solemn pro-
cession, perform a sacrifice, convene a meeting of the
senate, in which the time was fixed for the Latin festival
(ferisB Latinse) on the Alban Mount by the temple of
Jupiter Latiaris, and that he should not start for his
province before the termination of this festival, which at
the period of the Hannibalian war lasted several days.^
In order to avoid the chicanery of his opponents, who
might have retained him in the city or compelled him to
resign, under some futile pretext of a bad omen * or of an
irregularity in the ceremonies, Flaminius disregarded
the usual formalities, and left Some abruptly, in order to
enter on his office in his camp at Ariminum. The senate,
greatly exasperated, resolved to recall him, and sent an
1 See Becker, Handbuch der rom, AlierthuTner, ii. 122 ; iy. 440.
* Livy, zxi. 63 : ' Flaminius ratus auspiciis ementiendis, Latinaramque
fenarum mora, et consularibus aliis impedimentis retenturos se in urbe,
simulato itinere privatus clam in proTinciam abiit.' Livy (xxii. 1) gives a
fonnidable list of these 'prodigia/ -which were eyidentlj intended to keep
Flaminius from taking the field :— 'In Sicily the spears of soldiers were seen
to be on fire ; in Sardinia the staff which a Soman knight carried burnt
away in his hand whilst he was on his round to inspect the sentinels on the
wall of a town ; frequent fires lighted up the sea-coast ; from two shields
blood exuded ; seTeral soldiers were struck by lightning ; the orb of the sun
appeared to grow smaller ; in Prseneste fiery stones fell from the sky ; at
Arpi shields were seen in the sky, and the sun appeared to be fighting with the
moon ; at Capena two moons were seen by day ; at Csere the water of a stream
was mixed with blood, and spots of blood even appeared on the water that
flowed from the fountain of Hercules ; at Antium bloody ears feU into the
baskets of reapers ; at Falerii the heavens seemed to be rent asunder, and from
the gap a bright light shone forth ; the prophetic tablets shrank, and one of
them fell on the ground, containing the words : " Mavors shakes his spear ; **
sweat appeared on the statue of Mars in the Appian road, and on those of the
sacred wolves ; at Capua the heavens seemed to be on fire, as also the moon,
which set amidst a shower of rain ; goats were bom covered with wool ; a
hen was changed into a cock, and a cock into a hen/ The list of expiatory
rites and sacrifices is equally interesting. In it are comprised the dedication to
Jupiter of a golden thunderbolt fifty pounds in weight, several other offerings,
lectistemia, and a public feast (convivium publicum).
200 ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK embassy to insist on his immediate return. Flaminins
%— y ' — ' paid no attention to the order of the senate, which he
knew to be of no legal force, and assumed the command
of the army at Ariminum without the observance of the
usual religious formalities. But signs of warning oc-
curred even now. At the sacrifice a calf, already struck,
but not killed by the axe, escaped from the hands of the
attendant, sprinkled many persons with its blood, and
disturbed the solemn proceedings by the terror which such
an evident sign of the divine displeasure produced. The
great calamity that was to befall Italy was hastened by
the wickedness of men like Flaminiua, who disregarded
the warnings of the gods.
Marches of The internal disputes did not prevent the Bomans from
the two
consuls. inaking their preparations for the ensuing campaign with
circumspection and care.* The military strength of Italy
was sufficient, not only once more to encounter the
principal enemy with perfect confidence, but amply to
provide for the safety of the distant parts of the Boman
dominion. Troops were sent to Sicily, Sardinia, Tarentum,
and other places. Sixty quinqueremes were added to the
fleet. The faithful Hiero of Syracuse, as indefatigable in
the service of Bome as ever, sent SOO Cretans and 1,000
light- armed infantry.* Four new legions were raised, and
magazines of provisions were established in the north of
Etruria and in Ariminum, by one of which two routes the
advance of the Carthaginians was expected. In the latter
place the remnants of the army beaten at the Trebia were
collected,' and hence Flaminius led his men by cross and
by-roads over the Apennines into northern Etruria,* to
' Polybius, lii. 75.
• The Cretans were probably archers ; they were as much in repute for their
skill in the use of the bow as the Balearians for their ezpertness in using
the sling. The Bomans used neither of these weapons.
» Probably, as Mommsen suggests, conveyed by water from Placentia and
Cremona.
* Livy, xxi. 62 : 'Per tramites Apennini.' Probably the cavalry of these four
legions remained at Ariminum ; for, in the first place, the mountain roads
would be very difficult to pass with cavalry ; secondly, the caraliy was of more
importance in the plain near Ariminum than in the hilly country of Etruria^
THE SECOND PUNIC WAR.
201
join them to the two new legions which had been directed
there straight from Some.^
The second consul, Cn. Servilius, proceeded to Ariminum
with the two other newly-levied legions.* His army
thirdly, the anny of Seryilins at Ariminum must have been uDnsually strong
in cavalry, as a detachment of 4,000 horse could be dispatched to intercept
Hannibal (see p. 204).
> Thus the divergent statements of Polybius (iii. 77) and Livy (xxi. 62) can
be made to agree.
' Polybius is not sufficiently explicit in his statements concerning the
armaments end the strength of the military force in 217 B.C. It seems almost
that he purposely avoids expressing himself clearly. He says (iii. 75) that
the Komans sent two armies {a-rparrSirtia) to Sardinia and Sicily, garrisons to
Tarentum and other places, that they fitted out sixty penteres, and that the
consuls raised new armies {arpon-Surt^a). It is especially important to under-
stand the latter expression, irvvrjyoy rohs avfifjidxovs Kcti KoriyfKupoy rh irap*
ainois (Trpar^cda. Mommsen, as it seems, infers that the consuls did not
raipe any new legions, but only completed those that had been defeated on the
Trebia. This cannot be right. The words of Polybius do not admit such an
interpretation. Moreover, it does not agree with the statements of the
strength of the army of Flaminius in the battle on Lake Thrasymenus, nor with
a report of Appian (vii. 8). In the battle on the Thrasymene the Komans lost,
according to Polybius, 30,000 men, i.e,, their whole army, the strength of
which Appian also gives at 30,000 men. This was in round numbers the two
new kgions (20,000 men), and 10,000 men more, i.e. the remnants of the
legions from Transalpine Gaul. Accordingly, of the 42,000 men who fought
at the Trebia, only 10,000 men were disposable for the campaign of 217 b.c., a
result which is in perfect accordance with all that we know of the disastrous
battle on the Trebia. The statement of Appian (vii. 8) is to this effect, that in
217 B.a the Romans had on foot thirteen legions. This number cannot be
made up, if we suppose that the consuls of 217 had not formed four new
legions, but simply replenished the legions of the preceding year. On the
other hand, the number of thirteen legions agrees with the assumption that in
217 B.C. four new legions were raised. There were in Spain two legions, in
Sicily and Sardinia one each, in Tarentum and the rest of Italy one, on the
Po the remnants of four legions, and, lastly, four new ones. Apart from the
objections which these positive statements cause against Mommsen's unsup-
ported assumption, the course of events seems to show that the Komans did
not confine themselves to supplementing the remnants of the defeated legions,
and thus expose themselves to the risk of another defeat by HannibaFs
victorious army, which was now considerably swelled by Gauls. This view is
hardly borne out by the expressions of Polybius (iii. 7^» § 4), 9ih iral irapaB6^ou
^wtivros aJurois rov xpdyfxaros vepl riis Xofwks wapoffKtviis iiuupfp6ifr«»s iyiyvovro :
1 7 : Tdtrra Z\ kcU irarrax<^c*' itftpy&s iirolfiufov. Polybius is silent on the circum-
stance related by Livy, that Flaminius entered on his office at Ariminum.
Following his narrative alone, we might fancy that Flaminius had proceeded
from Kome straight to Arretium in Etruria. This silence is perhaps inten-
tional. Polybius, as a free-thinker, was disgusted with the use which the
Koman aristocracy made of the popular superstition, but instead of reproving*
CHAP.
vni.
■ 1 -*
First
Period,
218-216
B.C.
202
BOMAN HISTORY.
BOOK
IV.
Misealcu-
Istion of
the
Bomans;
March of
the Car-
thaginiaDS.
coBsisted, according to Appian, of 40,000 men in all. If
this statement is to be trusted, ServiUas must have had,
besides the two new legions and the nsual number of
allies, a body of 20,000 auxiliaries, who were perhaps
Cenomanians. The cavalrj of his armj was verj strong
if, as Foljbius reports,^ Servilius dispatched 4,000 of them
into Etruria as soon as he was informed of Hannibal's
march in that direction.
The situation was, upon the whole, identical with that
of 225 B.C., eight years before, when the Romans expected
that the Gauls would advance either bj the eastern road
through Picenum, or on the western side of the Apennines
from the Upper Arno. Thej had then divided their armies
between Ariminum and Arretium, in order to cover both
roads to Borne. But as they were then deceived by the
Grauls, who crossed the Apennines, not near the Upper Arno,
but £ax westward near the sea-coast, and suddenly appeared
in Etruria without having encountered any opposition,
80 they were now a second time surprised by Hannibal.
On the first appearance of spring the Carthaginian
army broke up from the plain of the Po. It had been
considerably strengthened by Gauls. Crossing the Apen*
nines, probably by the pass which is now called that of
Pontremoli and leads from Parma to Lucca,' Hannibal
had reached the Arno, while Servilius was still expecting
him at Ariminum. The march to FsesulsB, through the
low ground along the Arno, was beset with great diffi*
culties. The country was flooded by the spring rains and
the melting of the snow on the mountains, and had in
several places assumed the aspect of vast lakes. Men and
beasts sank deep into the soft ground ; many of the horses
Ids frienda, he Demamed sUent. But this silance eannot inTalidate the positive
teatimony of Livj.
» Polybius, iii. 86.
' The locality where Hannibal crossed the Apennines cannot be fixed with
more certainty than his passage over the Alps, as Polybius mentions no names
and does not describe the country accurately. Nissrn (Rhein. MuMum,
xxii. 674) is in favour of the road from Modena or Bologna to Pistoja, and
thinks the inundated country was the valley of the Ombrone between Pistoja
and Fiesole.
THE SECOND PUNIC WAR. 203
lost their hoofs and perished. A portion of the army was CHAP,
obliged to wade through the water for three days, and to
pass the nights without being able to find dry spots on j^^^
which they might rest or sleep, except the bodies of fallen 218-216
animals, and heaps of the abandoned baggage. The damp
and variable weather, together with excessive fatigue,
and especially the want of sleep, caused sickness and
terrible havoc among the troops. Hannibal himself lost
one of his eyes by inflammation. The Gauls suffered
most. They formed the centre in the line of march, and
if Hannibal had not taken the precaution of causing the
cavalry, under hia brave brother Mago, to close the rear,
they woxdd have deserted in crowds, for they were near
home, and, as Gauls, they had no perseverance to bear up
against continued hardships.
Having reached the Upper Arno, Hannibal allowed his Move-
army to repose. Then he marched southwards, passing n^^iwi
by the camp of Flaminius near Arretium, in the direction of towards
Cortona. To attack the fortified camp of the consul would
have been hopeless. Even at the Trebia Hannibal had
left the defeated and wounded Scipio and his discouraged
army unmolested in his camp, and had preferred to engage
two united consular armies in the field rather than attack
one within its intrenchments. It was therefore natural
that he should now try to provoke Flaminius to leave his
camp and fight a battle.^ If he marched further south
towards Bome, it was impossible for Flaminius to remain
stationary at Arretium. Between Hannibal and Home
there was now no Koman army. Who would take the
responsibility of letting the enemy march unopposed upon
Bome ? Whether Hannibal would attack the city, and
whether an attack would succeed, nobody could tell. At
any rate the apprehensions in Rome were great. It was
the duty of the two consuls to beat the enemy in the field.^
* According to Polybius (iii. 82), Flaminius was aggrarated and offended
because Hannibal inarched past him as &om contempt. This is surely a mis-
representation, like many others, intended to cast a blemish on the character
of Flaminius, and it owes its origin probably to his political opponents.
' The same Tiew is expressed by Nissen {Bheinisches Museum^ xzii. 665).
204
EOMAN HISTORY.
BOOK
IV.
^ 1 "
Move-
ments of
Flaminiua.
On no account could they think of remaining in the north
of Italy whilst the capital was threatened.*
Flaminius accordingly hroke up from Arretium and
followed Hannibal closely. It is not at all probable that
he had any idea of oflfering or accepting battle before
his colleague, whom he had now every reason to expect
in Etruria, should arrive from Ariminum. Perhaps he
contemplated a repetition of the campaign in the late
Gallic war, which eight years before had led to such
brilliant results.* At that time a Gallic army, followed
by the army of one Boman consul, suddenly encountered
the other consul in front, and was cut to pieces by a
combined attack of the two colleagues. Now, if Servilius
marched rapidly by the Flaminian road from Umbria, and
succeeded in placing himself between Hannibal and Rome,
the two consuls could, as on the previous occasion, fall
upon the enemy from two sides. It appears that
Servilius acted upon such a plan as this. He dispatched
a body of 4,000 horse, under C. Centenius, in advance, and
followed with the infantry on the Flaminian road.' It
was therefore the duty of Flaminius to keep as close as
possible to the Carthaginians, in order to be near enough,
on the expected approach of the second Boman army, for
a combined action. He was strong enough for this, for he
had more than 30,000 men. This force sufficed to hamper
the movements of the invaders, and even to protect the
country to some extent fi^m devastation. In a few hours
Boman soldiers could make a fortified camp, in which they
would be safe from a surprise, and even from an attack in
due form. For this reason a Eoman general C/Oxdd venture
close to an enemy, without exposing himself to any extra-
ordinary risks.'* The plan of Flaminius cannot therefore
* Thus the Koman legions followed Pyrrhus when he marched upon Borne.
See vol. i. p. 623. • See above, p. 129.
' These marched on the Flaminian road (see Nissen, Shein, Miueum, xx.
228), and had probably left it at Mevonia to turn to the right towards
Perusia, when the battle on the Lake Thrasymenus forced them to return. On
this retreat they were overtaken and defeated by Maharbal. See below, p. 210.
* This was usual in the strategical operations of the Bomans. A weU-
THE SECOND PUNIC WAB. 205
be called rash. But he had in his calculation overlooked CBAP.
one item, or rated it at too low a figure. The enemy he . '^
had to deal with was not a horde of barbarian Gauls, but p^^^
a disciplined army of veteran soldiers, led by Hannibal. 21 8-21 6
The unfortunate are seldom treated with justice by ^'^'
their friends, never by their enemies. Flaminius was t^©\fo^e^
recognised leader of the popular party, and the history of jcensures
Eome was written by the adherents and clients of the Ij^^ yi&-
nobility. Thus Flaminius has experienced, even at the pnias.
hands of Polybius, an ungenerous, nay, unjust, treatment. /
But, in truth, if he committed faults in his command, if he
allowed himself to be outwitted and surprised in an
ambush by a superior antagonist, he is not more guilty
than many other Boman consuls before and after him,
whose faults were forgiven because they belonged to the
ruling party. And yet few of these have an equal claim to
consideration and forgiveness with Flaminius, who atoned
for his fault with his life.^ Nevertheless, party hatred
survived him, and delighted in making him responsible
for the whole misfortune which the genius of Hannibal
inflicted on his ill-fated army.
Polybius disdains repeating the silly charge brought Charges
against Flaminius, that he rushed into misfortune through j^^^^^
his contempt of the gods. Livy, however, is more Flaminius.
punctilious in preserving traits which are characteristic
of Boman manners and sentiment. He relates, therefore,
that, on starting from Arretium, he was thrown from his
horse, but disregarded not only this warning of the gods,
known illustration is the campaign of Fabius Mazimus in the following year.
Compare Livj, xxii. 12: 'Fabins per loca alta agmen ducebat modico ab
ho0t« intervallo, ut neque omitteret eum, neque congrederetur.'
' Arnold {History of Home, iii. 110) says most justly and eloquently:
* Flaminius died bravely, sword in hand, having committed no greater military
error than many an impetuous soldier whose death in his country's cause has
been felt to throw a veil over his rashness, and whose memory is pitied and
honoured. The party feelings which have so coloured the language of the
ancient writers respecting him need not be shared by a modem historian.
Flaminius was indeed an unequal antagonist to Hannibal ; but, in his previous
life, as consul and as censor, he had served his country well ; and if the
defile of Thrasymenus witnessed his rashness, it also contains his honourable
grave.*
206 ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK but another also which still more plainly bade him stay.
An ensign-bearer being unable with all his strength to
pull the ensign out of the ground, Flaminius ordered it to
be dug out.* On the other hand, Polybius' prefers a
graver charge against the unfortunate general. He says
that he was urged by political considerations — ^by the
fear of losing the popular favour; that he wished to
appropriate to himself the glory of defeating Hannibal
without sharing it with his colleague ; that he was puffed
up with vanity, and considered himself a great general ;
and that for these reasons he was anxious to hurry on an
engagement with Hannibal, and rushed heedlessly into
danger. We hold these charges to be unjust, and to be
refuted by the events themselves.' K Flaminius had been
foolishly eager to bring on an engagement, he would
surely not have waited till Hannibal had advanced as faf
as Arretium, still less would he have allowed him to pass
by his camp. He would have gone to meet him, and he
would have been able to attack the Punic army before it
had recovered from the fatigues and hardships of & long
march across the Apennines and through the lands inun-
dated by the Amo. He would, then, if he had been victo-
rious, have prevented the devastation of northern Etruria^
and have secured for himself the glory which he is said to
have so much coveted. Instead of doing this, he remained
quietly in his camp; and the &.tal battle on the Thrasymene
was not offered by him, but accepted, because he had no
chance of avoiding it. It is no less an invention of his
political enemies that, as Polybius says, Hannibal built
his plan on his knowledge of the inconsiderate ardour,
audacity, and vainglorious folly of Flaminius. His faults
were too much the general faults of most Boman consuls
to make it necessary for Hannibal to devise peculiar
stratagems against this particular leader.
' Livy, xxii. 3. • Polybius, iii. 81,
' The statement of Polybius (iii. 82, § 8), that the number of soldiers in
the army of Flaminius was less than that of the unarmed crowd attracted
by the hope of booty, is a self-eyident and unpardonable exaggeration.
THE SECOND PUNIC WAR. 207
When, on his march, Hannibal had passed Cortona, and CHAP
reached the Lake Thrasymenns (Lago di Perugia), he ^ — ,-L^
resolved to halt and to wait for the Romans, who were pg"*^
closely following him; and then, having chosen his 218-216
ground, he made his dispositions for the coming struggle.
On the northern side of the lake, where it is skirted by Disposi-
the road from Cortona to Perusia, a steep range of hiQs g^^nnfbal's
approaches near to the water's edge, so that the road (from forces.
Borghetto to Magione) passes through a defile, formed by
the lake on the right and the mountains on the left. In one
spot only (near the modem village of Tuoro) the hills recede
to some distance, and leave a small expanse of level ground,
bordered on the south by the lake, and everywhere else by
steep heights. On these heights Hannibal drewup his army.
With the best portion of his infantry, the Libyans and
Spaniards, he occupied a hill jutting out into the middle of
the plain. On his lefb or eastern side he placed the slingers
and other light troops ; on his right he drew up the Gauls,
and beyond them his cavalry, on the gentler slopes as far
as the point where the defile begins and where he expected
the advance of the Bomans. Probably the ground near
the lake waa marshy, and consequently the road wound
along the foot of the hills, where they receded from the
water.*
Late in the evening of the day on which these arrange- The battle
ments were made (it was still April), Flaminius arrived in ^^^
the neighbourhood, and encamped for the night not far meneiake..
from the lake. Early the next morning he continued his
march, anxious to keep close up to the enemy, and not
suspecting that the lion whose track he was following was
crouching close by and was prepared to leap upon him with
> This is the description of the battle-field given by Nissen {fiKein^ Museum,
zxiii. 580 ff.). But it is evident that Polybius (iii. 83) imagined it to be
different. He seems to have thought that the road on which Flaminius was
attacked ran right through, and not past, the vallej, the two sides of which
Hannibal had lined with his troops. But, as the road from Cortona to Perusia
passes through no such valley near the lake (see Arnold, Hist, of Home,
iii. 106), we have no alternative but to adapt to the locality, as well as we
can, the description of the battle given by Polybius.
208 ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK a sudden bound. A thick mist had risen from the lake
IV
< ^ — ^ and covered the road and the foot of the hills, while their
' summits were shining in the morning sun. Nothing
betrayed the presence of the enemy. With the feeling of
perfect security, in regular marching order, laden with their
baggage, the soldiers entered the fatal ground, and the
long line of the army wound along slowly between the
lake and the hills. The head of the column had already
passed the small plain on their left, and was marching
along that part of the road where the mountains came
close to the water's edge. The rear-guard had just entered
the defile^ when suddenly the stillness of the morning was
broken by the wild cry of battle, and the Eomans, as if
they were attacked by invisible enemies, were struck down
without being able to ward oflf or return a blow. Before
they could throw down their cumbersome baggage and
seize their arms, the enemy was among them. They
rushed in masses from all the hills at the same timOk
There was no time to form into order of battle. Every one
had to rely on the strength of his own arm and strike for
life as well as he could. In vain Flaminius tried to rally
and form his men. They rushed in all directions upon the
enemy or upon each other, wild with dismay and despair.
It was no battle, but a butchery. The office of the general
could no longer be to lead his men, and to superintend and
control the fight, but to set the example of individual
courage, and to discharge the duty of the meanest soldier.
This duty Plaminius performed, and he fell in the midst
of the brave men whom he had led to their death. The
Bomans were slain by thousands, showing in death that
unwavering spirit which so often led them to victory. A
few, pushed into the lake, tried to save their lives by
swimming, but the weight of their armour pressed them
down. Others waded into the water as far as they could,
but were mercilessly cut down by the hostile cavalry, or
died by their own hands. Only a body of 6,000 men, which
had formed the head of the line of march, cut their way
through the Carthaginians and reached the top of the hills.
B.C.
THE SECOND PUNIC WAR. 209
from which, after the mist was dispersed, they beheld CHAP,
the terrible carnage below, and saw at the same time that v.. — ,—1^
they were nnable to assist their perishing comrades. They p^^
therefore moved forward, and took up a position in 218-216
a neighbouring village. But they were soon overtaken by
Hannibal's indefatigable cavahy, under the command of
Maharbal, and were compelled to lay down their arms and
surrender.
In three short hours the work of destruction was
finished. Fifteen thousand Bomans covered the bloody
field. The prisoners were equally numerous. It appears,
from the account of Polybius, that none escaped.' The
Boman army was not only defeated but annihilated. The
loss of the Carthaginians, on the other hand, was small.
Fifteen hundred men, for the most part Gauls, had fallen.
Hannibal honoured thirty of the more distinguished of
them by a solemn frmeral. He searched also for the body
of the unfortunate Flaminius, to give him a burial worthy
of his rank. But among the heaps of the slain, the Boman
consul, stripped, no doubt, and despoiled of his insig^a,
could not be identified. A hostile fate, which exposed him
to the reviling tongue of his political opponents and
blackened his memory, deprived him also of the respect
which a generous enemy was ready to bestow. The
prisoners were treated by Hannibal as on the previous
occasion. Those of them who were Bomans were kept in
chains. The Boman allies obtained their freedom without
' In Liv^'s account we can perceive the intention to make the Roman loss
appear smaller than it was, and to exaggerate that of the Carthaginians,
^though be protests against such an intention, and, in tmth, does not on this
occasion indulge to an undue extent in that national sin of the Boman
historians (Livy, xxii. 7). He admits that 15,000 Eomans fell in the battle,
and that 6,000 were taken by Maharbal after the battle was over ; but he says
nothing of any prisoners made in the battle, which is an evident, if not an
intentional, omission. According to Polybius, the number of prisoners
amounted altogether to 15,000. He says nothing of Aigitives. But Livy
states that 10,000 Romans escaped, which, if true, would go far to modify the
character of the calamity. Livy, moreover, states the number of slain in the
Carthaginian army at 2,500 (1,000 more than Polybius), and he adds, evidently
for the purpose of soothing the soreness of Roman patriotism, that many
died afterwards of their wounds.
VOL. n. p
210
ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK
IV.
Dismay in
the city of
Rome on
the tidings
of the
battle.
Defeat of
Centeniufl.
ransom, and were assured that Hannibal waged war only
with Eome, and had come to free them from the Roman
yoke.
The news of the terrible slaughter at Lake Thrasymenus
reached Rome in the course of the following day.* This
time no attempt was made to hide or to colour the truth.
Already fugitives had hastened to Rome, and reported
what they had seen or what they apprehended. The Forum
was thronged with an anxious crowd that pressed round
the senate-house, impatient to know what had happened.
When at length, towards evening, the praetor Marcus
Pomponius ascended the public platform, and announced,
with a loud voice, * We are beaten in a great battle, our
army is destroyed, and Maminius, the constd, is slain,'
the people gave themselves up to their grief without re-
serve, and the scene was more affecting than even the
carnage of the battle.* The senate alone preserved its
dignity, and calmly consulted on the measures necessary
for the safety of the town.
Three days later fresh tidings of evil arrived. The 4,000
horse under the proprsetor Centenius, whom the consul Ser-
vilius had dispatched from Ariminum to retard the advance
of Hannibal until he could follow with the bulk of his
troops, had fallen in with the victorious army, and were
either cut to pieces or captured by Maharbal's cavalry and
light troops.* By this reverse the army of the second
* This may be inferred from Livy, xxii. 6, 7,
« PolybiuB, iii. 86, § 8.
' The spot where this happened is not mentioned by Polybius (iii. 86).
Zonaras names Spoletium, and Livy (xxii. 8) agrees with him in so far as he
refers it to Umbria. Appian (vii. 9) says the engagement took place near a
lake called Pleistine, which is otherwise quite unknown. Appian's account,
however, is very incorrect and confused. He makes the force of Centenius to
be 8,000 strong, and says he was sent from Rome. Kissen (Rhein, Museum,
XX.. 224) thinks that the Lake Pleistine, like several other lakes that existed
formerly in Central Italy, is now dried up, and that its bed is to be recognised
in the valley of Pistia, between Colfiorito, Serravalle, and Dignano, on the road
from Foligno to Camerino. This view is very plausible. It would prove, moreover,
that Servilius, with the second consular army, to which the 4,000 horse be-
longed, was marching southwards, on the Via Flaminia, evidently with the inten-
tion of placing himself between Hannibal and Borne, or of joining the army of
THE SECOND PUNIC WAR. 211
consul, being deprived of its cavalry, was disabled, and CHAP,
could no longer ofifer any resistance to Hannibal's advance. ^ . . ' ._
The Punic horsemen now rangred without control through J^^^^
° ^ Pebiod,
southern Etruria, and showed themselves actually at 218-216
Namia, scarcely two days' march from Rome.* ^^*
The most serious apprehensions for the safety of the Finnness
city appeared not unfounded. Between Hannibal and J^^®^
Eome there now intervened no army in the field. One army senate,
was destroyed and the other wa* fer away in Umbria,
crippled and unable to oppose the enemy. The boldest
resolutions could be expected of a general like Hannibal.
Nothing seemed to be able to stop or retard the progress
of the man who passed through Italy like a devastating
element, crushing all resistance and setting all obstacles at
nought. Nevertheless the men of Bome did not despair.
The senate remained united for several days in a perma-
nent consultation from morning xmtil evening, and, by
its gravity and firmness, gradually inspired the terri-
fied people with some degree of confidence and hope.
Measures were taken immediately for the defence of the
city. The bridges over the Tiber and other rivers were
destroyed,^ stones and projectiles accumulated, and the
walls put in a state of defence. The arms which were
hung up in the temples as trophies of war were taken
down and distributed to old soldiers.' Above all things,
a new head was given to the state. The times were
i*emembered when men like Ciucinnatus and Camillus,
invested with unlimited authority^ had saved the republic
from imminent danger. The ancient office of the dictator-
ship had almost fallen into oblivion. The living genera-
tion of younger men knew of it only from the tales of their
fathers. Thirty-two years had passed since, in the
darkest period of the first Punic war, after the great defeat
at Drepana, a dictator had been chosen. Now, in the
his colleague. This plan must, of course, have been concerted between the two
consuls as soon as Hannibal had appeared in Etruria, and in it lies a further
justification of Flaminius.
> Zonaras, viii. 26,
* Livj, zzii. 8. Zonaras, Till. 26. ' Appian, TiL 11.
F 2
212
ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK
IV.
Prodic-
tutorship
of a
Fabius
Mttximus.
overwlielming violence of the tempest, this often tested
sheet anchor was tried again. Bat it was not possible to
appoint a dictator according to the forms and rales of the
old law. A consul ought to nominate the dictator ; but
Flaminius was dead, and between Servilius and Borne
stood the hostile army. A mode of appointing a dictator
was therefore adopted which had never been resorted to
before, and waa never applied again. A pro-dictator and
a master of the horse * were elected by popular suffrage.
The man selected was Q. Fabius Maximus, who had served
the state honourably in many public functions, and who
belonged to a noble and at the same time moderate patri-
cian house, which from the earliest ages of the republic,
and especially in the Sanmite wars, had* proved its warlike
abilities. Q. Fabius was not a bold, enterprising general,
but a man of firmness and intrepidity ; and it was precisely
such a man that Bome required at a time when adversity
was threatening on all sides.
The first task of the dictator was to restore the shaken
faith in the national gods. There was no hope of salva-
tion from the present calamity, unless the gods were duly
propitiated. It was clear that, not the sword of the
enemy, but the contempt of the gods, which Flaminius had
been guilty of, was the cause of the great reverses. Now
the impious scoffers had been put to shame, and the
forfeited favour of the outraged deity could only be regained
by penitence and submission to the sacred rites of the
national religion. The Sibylline books were consulted.
On their advice the dictator vowed a temple to the Erycinian
Venus, and the praetor T. Otacilius promised a temple to
the goddess Beason (Mens). For the celebration of the
public games the sum of thirty-three thousand three
hundred and thirty-three and one-third pounds of copper
was voted ;^ white oxen were slaughtered as an atoning
> Polybius, iii. 87. Livy, xxii. 8. According to Plutarch {FiUt. Mas. 4), it
was Fabius himself Uiat nominated the magister eqnitum. There can be no
doabt that the statement of Polybius and Livy is correct.
■ Surely a most remarkable number, and one showing the sacredness of the
number three among the Bomans. It reminds us of the oldest political
THE SECOND PUNIC WAR. 213
sacrifice, and the whole popolatioiiy men, women, and CHAP,
children, put up their prayers and ofiFerings to the gods. s.
FlBST
For three continuous days the six principal pairs of deities ^^^
were publicly exhibited on couches and feasted.^ A 218-216
solemn vow was made by the community, if the Eoman
commonwealth of the Quirites should remain unimpaired
for five years, to sacrifice to Jupiter all the young of
swine, sheep, goats, and cattle that should be bom in this
year.* It was not necessary to devote also the children
of men ; they fell in fall hecatombs as victims to the god
of war on the field of battle.
Having scrupulously fulfilled the duties to the gods. Military
Fabius addressed himself to military measures. The first ^^f^^.
task was to fill up the gap which the fatal battle of Lake
Thrasymenus had made in the armed force. Two' new
legions were raised. The consul Servilius was ordered
to come to Borne with his two legions. He met the
dictator at Ocriculum on the Tiber, not far from Namia.^
Here the Boman soldiers who had never been commanded
by a dictator saw for the first time that his power in the
state was supreme. When the consul was drawing near
the dictator, the latter commanded him to dismiss his
lictors, and to appear alone before his superior, who was
preceded by twenty-four lictors.
Meanwhile more evil news had arrived. A fieet of Greatness
of the
institntioDB of Home, in which the number three and its mnltipleb frequently ^^ ^*
occur — the three tribes, the thirty curies, the three hundred knights, and the
original legion of three thousand men ; the three hundred senators, three
hundred colonists, and, in religion, the Capitoline trinity of Jupiter, Venus, and ^
Minerra. —
> Livy, zxii. 10: 'Sex pulvinaria in oonspectu fuerunt; IotI ac lunoni
unum, alternm Neptuno ac Minervs, tertium Marti et Veneri, qnartum
ApoUini ac Diane, quintum Vulcano ac Vestae, sextum Mercurio et Cereri/
' Livy, xxii. 9, 10. Polybius passes over the detail of all the superstitious
rites, which he detests, and says only (iii. 88, § 7), *dfiios . . • 6^0*01 rois
Otoit . . . i^(&pijaiff9,
' LiTy, xxii. 11. According to Polybius (iii. 88, § 7), four legions. Liv/s
statement is more precise and credible, especially as it is confirmed xxii. 27.
* This statement of Livy (xxii. 11) appears to be trustworthy, and b
preferable to that of Polybius (iii. 88, | 8), according to which Fabius and
Servilius effected their junction in northern Apulia.
214
ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK
IV.
Plans of
Hannibal.
transports, destined for the legions in Spain, had been sur-
prised and taken bj the Carthaginians near Cosa on the
coast of Etmria. Upon this news Servilins was sent to
Ostia, to arm and eqnip the Boman ships in that port.
Out of the lower class of people he enrolled seamen for
the fleet and a body of soldiers to serve as a garrison for the
citj. Already the pressure of war was felt, and was producing
alarming symptoms. In spite of the apparently inexhaus-
tible population of Italy, in spite of the vast superiority of
Bome over Carthage in men trained to war — the point in
which the preponderance of Borne chiefly lay — the Bomans
were obliged, in the second year of the war, to take soldiers
from a class of citizens which in the good old time was
looked upon as unworthy of the honourable service of war.
From among the freedmen, the descendants of manumitted
slaves, those were enrolled who were fathers of families,
and seemed to have given pledges to the state for their
fidelity in its service. The time was not yet come, but it
was approaching, when the proud city would be compelled
to arm the hands of slaves in her defence.
The apprehension that Hannibal, after his victory over
Flaminius, would march straight upon Bome, proved un-
founded. Hannibal knew perfectly well that, with his
reduced army, his few remaining Spanish and African
veterans, and with the unsteady Gauls, he could not lay
siege to such a town as Bome. His plan had been from
the very beginning to induce the Boman allies to revolt,
and in union with them to strike at the head of his foe.
He calculated above all on the Sabellian nations in the
heart of Italy. They had offered the longest and stoutest
resistance to the Boman supremacy. If he succeeded in
gaining their co-operation, his great plan was realised,
Carthage was avenged, and Bome annihilated or perma-
nently weakened. Hannibal therefore did not remain long
in Etruria, which was entirely in his power, and where he
would have found ample resources and l>ooty for his army.
It seems that he did not expect much help from the
Etruscans, who were too fond of peace and quiet, and looked
THE SECOND PUNIC WAE. 216
upon his allies, the Gauls, their old national enemies and CHAP,
despoilers, with unmitigated distrust. After an unsuccess- ^_ ^ '_^
ful attempt to surprise Spoletium, he marched westwards, jZ?"
through Umbria and Ficenum, to the coast of the Adria- 218-216
tic. These rich and well-cultivated districts now felt the ^'^'
scourge of war. The Eoman settlers, who, since the agra-
rian law of Flaminius, were very numerous in Picenum,
suffered most. No doubt Hannibal followed the same
rule which since his first victory he had observed with
regard to the Boman citizens and Eoman allies that feU
into his hands. The former he had treated, if not cruelly,
yet with harshness and severity, by keeping them as pri-
soners and loading them with chains. The latter he had
endeavoured to gain over by his generosity, and had dis-
missed them without ransom. There is something, there-
fore, perplexing in the statement of Poly bins,' that Hanni-
bal now put to death all the men capable of bearing arms
that fell into his hands. We have no hesitation in declaring
this to be a pure fiction or a gross exaggeration. By such
an act of cruelty, Hannibal, even if he had been capable of
it, would have interfered with the success of his own plan.
But we can hardly hold him capable of causing the murder
of inoffensive people, when the utmost severity he showed
to soldiers taken in battle was imprisonment. The Soman
reports were therefore either inspired by national hatred,
or caused by isolated acts of barbarity, such as occur even
in the best disciplined armies, not with the sanction,
but agaiust the explicit order of the commander-in-chief.
Yet, though in all probability the lives of the people of The Car-
Picenum were spared, their property was forfeited to the jJ^^J*^*"*
wants and the rapacity of the invading host. Hannibal's num.
* The language of Polybius (iii. 86, § 11) is not quite precise. Having
said that Hannibal killed iro\b irKriOos Mp^»y on his march, he adds,
vapdyy^KfAd ri Z^ofUvop ^y, <f^ovt{t€iy rovs iiroiriirroyrai rt$p iv reus riKiKlais,
Whether this order was ezecuti^, and whether those that were actually killed
were killed in compliance with it, or for other reasons, he does not say, but he
learee us to infer it. It is to be remarked, however, that Livy, who seldom
omits an opportunity for stigmatising what he calls Hannibars ' inhumana
CTudelitas,' is silent on this alleged act of barbarity, which he might have
brought in with effect (zzii. 9).
'ice-
216
ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK
IV.
Adoption
of the
Roman
arms.
Exultation
at Car-
thage.
soldiers had not yet recovered from the hardships of the
preceding winter and spring, and from their wounds re-
ceived in battle. A malignant skin disease was spread
among them.* The horses were overworked and in
wretched condition. Now, in the beantiftd mild spring
weather, Hannibal gave his army time to repose and to
recover. The country on the Adriatic produced wine, oil,
com, fruit in abundance. There was more than could be
consumed or carried away.* Now, at length, the army
was in the possession and enjoyment of the rich land
which on the snow-covered heights of the Alps had been
promised to them as the reward for their fidelity, courage,
and endurance.
But the time had not yet arrived for mere enjoyment
and repose, as if the hardships of war were all over.
Hannibal made use of the short interval of rest, the fruit
of his victory, to arm a portion of his army in the Roman
style. The quantities of arms taken in battle suflSced to
equip the African infantry with the short swords and the
large shields of the Boman legionary soldiers. We can-
not imagine a more striking proof of the superiority of
the Roman equipment, and consequently of the instinctive
aptitude of the Boman people for war, than the fact that
the greatest general of antiquity, in the heart of the hostile
country, exchanged the accustomed native armament of
his soldiers for that of the Romans.
A march of ten days had brought Hannibal from the
lake Thrasymenus across the Apennines to the shore of
the Adriatic. Having reached the sea coast, he renewed
the communication with Carthage which had long been
interrupted, and sent home the first direct and official
report of his victorious career. Of course the Carthagi-
nians were not ignorant of his proceedings. The sudden
withdrawal of the Roman legions, which had been sent to
Sicily for Jan expedition into Africa, was in itself a sufficient
> Polybius (iii. 87, § 2) calls it Xifi^pos.
' Polybius (iii. 88, § 1) tells us that Hannibal's soldiers had washed their
horses with old wine.
THE SECOND PUNIC WAR. 217
intimation that tlie Romans were attacked in Italy. CHAP.
Carthaginian cmisers hovered about the Italian coasts.
At Cosa, on the coast of Etruria, a fleet of Roman transports ^^^^
had been taken. The state of affairs in Italy was there- 218-216
fore, on the whole, perfectly well known in Carthage. ^'^'
Nevertheless, the first direct message from Hannibal, and
the authentic narrative of his immense success, produced
raptures of joy and enthusiasm, which showed that
Hannibal was supported by the consentient voice of his
countrymen. The Carthaginians resolved to continue
with all their strength the war in Italy and Spain, and to
reinforce in every possible manner, not only Hannibal, but
his brother Hasdrubal in Spain.'
Having completely restored and re-organised his army. The fidelity
Hannibal left the sea-board, and marched again into the Roman
midland parts of Italy, where the genuine Italians lived, allies.
who vied with the Romans and Latins for the prize of
courage. He passed through the country of the Marsians,
Marrucinians, and Pelignians into the northern part of
Apulia, called Daunia." Everywhere he offered his friend-
ship and alliance for a war with Rome, but everywhere he
met with refusals. Not a single town opened her gates
to him. All were as yet unshaken in their fidelity to Rome.
No doubt this fidelity was due in part to the character of
the Roman government, which was not unjust or oppressive,
and allowed to the subjects a full measure of self-govern-
' Polybins, iii. 87, J 6 : *E^' oh kHoivavrts fityaXtUos ^x^^om ol Kapxn-
Z6viot' iral ToW^y iirolowTo tnrovH^y koX wp6yoi(t» 6ir^p rod «caT& rdirra rp6wo¥
ivtKovptty ffol Tois iv 'IroA/f «cal rols iv *Wrip^9 irpdyficuri. Compared with this
evidence of Polybias, we cannot attribute the slightest weight to the statements
of Appian (vii. 16) and Zonaras (viii. 26 )» who say that, upon Hannibal's
report of his Yictories, the Carthaginians laughed at his demanding reinforce-
ments and assistance, saying that, if he were victorious, he ought to be able to
send money home, and not to ask for aid. Such silly language refutes itself.
The wonder is that any man pretending to the name of an historian could
attribute it to the government of a state like Carthage.
' This is the line of march given by Livy (zii. 9). Polybius (iii. 88, 3)
does not take Hannibal so far away from the coast, but straight from Picenum,
tbrongh the country of the Marrucinians and Frentanians, into Daunia.
Perhaps the main body of the army marched on the more direct road, and the
more inland districts were only visited by detached flying corps.
218
ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK
IV.
Romnn
finnndss.
ment ;* and partly it was prodiiced by fear of the revenge
which Borne would take if in the end she proved victorious.
But it is apparent that another motive operated at the
same time. A feeling of Italian nationality had grown up.
The Italians had been bound together with the Bomans by
the fear which they both entertained of the Grauls, the
worst enemies of their fertile country. As the numerous
tribes of Greeks learnt to feel and act as one nation in
their common war with the Persians, thus the Italians
first became conscious of being a kindred race in con-
sequence of the repeated invasions of the Grauls, and
they learnt to look for safety in a close union under the
leadership of Rome. These Gauls, the hereditary enemies
of all Italy, were now the most numerous combatants in
Hannibal's army. It was chiefly their co-operation that
made the present war so terrible, and threatened universal
devastation, ruin, and extermination. These feelings of
the Italians were the disturbing force which crossed Han-
nibal's expectations. Nevertheless, he did not yet despair
of the idtimate success of his plan. Perhaps his sword
could yet break the charm which bound up the Italians
with Bome. If they were acted upon mainly by fear, he
had only to show that he was more to be feared than the
Bomans, and that they risked more in remaining faithful
to their masters than in joining the invader.
The fidelity of the allies was justified by the firmness
which the Bomans displayed. Stunned for a moment by
the terrible blow of the late battle, the senate had speedily
recovered its composure, its confidence, and its genuine
Boman determination. There were no thoughts of yield-
ing, of compromise, or peace ; but the spirit of un-
wavering resistance animated the senate and every
individual Boman. Not a single soldier was withdrawn
from Spain, Sardinia, or Sicily. The spirit with which
Bome was determined to carry on the war was most
clearly expressed in the order issued to the different
> How the country flourished is seen from Folybius, iii. 90, § 7.
THE SECOND PUNIC WAR. 219
Italian districts threatened by the Punic army. It en- CHAP,
joined the people to take reftige in the nearest fortresses,
to set fire to the farm-honses and villages, to lay waste jZ™^
their fields, and to drive away the cattle.* Italy was to 21S-216
become a desert, rather than support the foreign invaders. ^'^'
It was in truth not advisable for a Boman army now to Koman
venture on an encounter in the open field with the irre- ^®^®®*
sistible conqueror. The losses of the Trebia and the
Thrasymenus could indeed be quickly replaced by new
levies, and Fabius ordered foiu: new legions to be raised.
But the impression produced by the repeated defeats
could not be so easily effaced. The self-confidence of the
Boman soldiers was gone. Before they again crossed swords
with the dreaded enemy, they had to learn to look him in
the face. Among the new levies there was, no doubt, a pro-
portion of old soldiers who had served in former campaigns,
but the majority were young recruits ; for the large levies,
recently made, could not have been effected unless the
younger men had been enlisted in considerable numbers.
The most difficult task, however, must have been that of
replacing the centurions and higher officers who had fallen
in battle; and the want of a sufficient number of ex-
perienced officers must have made the newly-raised
legions still more unfit to encounter Hannibal's formidable
veterans.
These circumstances necessarily imposed on Fabius the Tactics of
utmost caution, even though he had not been by nature Apulia/"
inclined to it. Before he could venture on a battle, he
was obliged to accustom his lirmy to war, and to revive
the courage and self-confidence which generally charac-
terised the Eoman soldier. He did this skilfully and per-
sistently, and thus he rendered the most essential service
that any general could at that time render to the state.
He marched (probably with four legions') through
Samiiium into northern Apulia, and encamped in the
neighbourhood of Hannibal near ^cso. In vain the latter
' Livy, zxii. 11. * Compare above^ p. 213, note 3.
220
ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK
IV.
Evpnts in
Campania.
tried to draw him out of his camp, and to force on an
engagement. Neither the haughty challenges of the
Punians, nor the sight of the devastations which they
committed round about, nor the impatience of Marcus
Minucius, his master of the horse, could induce the wary
old Fabius to change his cautious strategy. At length,
Hannibal marched past him into the mountains of
Samnium, and thus forced him to follow. But Fabius
followed more cautiously than Flaminius. He was naturally
the * cunctator,* and moreover he had before his eyes the
disaster that had befallen Flaminius. Hannibal had no
chance of coming upon him unawares. He passed through
the country of the Hirpinians and Caudinians without
impediment or resistance. For the third time in this one
year he crossed the Apennines, and suddenly appeared in
the Campanian plain. It was to be made clear to all the
Italians that the Punians were masters of Italy, and that
no Soman ventured to oppose them.
The plain of Campania was the garden of Italy. Its
fertility is proved by the many flourishing towns which,
in a wide circle, surrounded Capua, the largest and richest
of them all. Hannibal had already found partisans in
Capua, and he was in hopes that this city, which of old
was a rival of Bome, would join his cause. Among the
captives whom he had discharged after the battle on the
Thrasymene, there were three Capuan knights. These had
promised their services, and it was no doubt in order to
support and back their plans by the presence of his army
that he appeared now before the town. But the fruit was
not yet ripe. Capua remained faithful to Bome. Han-
nibal, therefore, did not remain longer in Campania than
was sufficient to plunder and lay waste the fertile Faler-
nian plain north of the Volturnus. The dictator Fabius
had followed in the track of the enemy across the
Apennines, and was encamped on the summit of the
mountain ridge of Massicus, which, from Casilinum, the
modem Capua, on the Volturnus, extends in a north-
westerly direction as far as the sea, and borders the
THE SECOND PUNIC WAR.
221
First
Period,
218-216
B.C.
Falemian plain on the north. From this high and safe CHAP,
position, the Romans could see. how the villages of the n.
plain were consumed by the flames, and how the culti-
vated fields were changed into wastes. But nothing could
induce Fabius to leave the heights and to offer battle in
the plain. Under these circumstances it appeared that
chance was offering him an opportunity of dealing the
enemy a decisive blow.
Hannibal had never had the intention of wintering in
Campania before a strong and large town was in his posses-
sion. He set himself therefore in motion to march back into
Apulia, with immense spoils and with long trains of captured
cattle. It seemed feasible to intercept an army thus encum-
bered somewhere in the mountainous region which lay be-
tween the plains of Campania and Apulia — a region with
which the Romans had become thoroughly familiar in the
Samnite wars, and which was inhabited by faithful allies.
The attempt was actually made. In a spot where the pass
over the mountains was contracted on one side by the
river Voltumus, and on the other by steep declivities, a
detachment of 4,000 Romans was posted to block up the
road, whilst Fabius, with the rest of his army, had taken
a strong position on the crest of a hill not far off. But
it was not so easy to catch Hannibal in a trap, nor was
the slow and pedantic Fabius the man to do it. No doubt
Hannibal, if he had found it necessary or desirable, might
have turned back and taken another road ; * but he pre-
ferred marching straight on. In order to clear the pass
in front of him, he caused, in the night, a number of oxen,
with bundles of lighted wood fastened to their horns, to
be driven against the crest of the range of hills. The
4,000 men in the pass, deceived by this sight, and think-
ing that the Carthaginian army intended to cross the
hills in that direction, left their post in the defile and
' Zonaras (viii. 26) and Appian (vii. 14) relate that Hannibal put to
death 5,000 prisoDurs of war, to rid himself of this encumbrance. As neither
Poljbius nor Liyy confirms this startling statement, we are justified in setting
it aside as false.
222
ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK
— — T-—
Dissatis-
f^tion
of the
Romans
■with
Fabins.
hastened to the spot on the heights which they believed to
be threatened. But they encountered here only a few light-
armed troops, whilst the bulk of the Punic army, with all
their plunder, marched unmolested through the pass,
which had been left without defence. During the dis-
order and the tumult of the night, Pabius had not ven-
tured out of his camp ; and when day broke, he could just
see his soldiers being driven from the heights with great
loss, and the hostile army winding through the defile and
beyond his reach.*
Again Hannibal marched through Samnium and crossed
the Apennines for the fourth time in the same year (217
B.C.), to take up his winter-quarters in the sunny plain
of Apulia. He occupied the town of Geronium between
the rivers Tifemus and Prento, and established his maga-
zines in it. Por his army he constructed a fortified camp
outside the town. Two-thirds of his troops he dispatched
in every direction to collect supplies, while with the remain-
ing third he kept Pabius in check, who had again followed
him, without however venturing so near as to risk a battle.
But during a temporary absence of the dictator, who had
been obliged to go to Rome for the performance of some
religious ceremonies, Minucius, the master of the horse,
being left in command of the Boman forces, made an
attempt to check the predatory excursions of the Cartha-
' The locality of this celebrated stratagem of Hannibal cannot be ascertained
'with accuracy from the reports either of Polybius (iii. 92) or of Livy (zxii. 16),
who differ considerably from one another. We may here remark again, what
we have observed several times, that the ancient authors are most defective in
their descriptions of places. Near Casilinum, where, according to lavy,
Hannibal found himself almost surrounded (' inclusus inde videri Hannibal via
ad Casilinum obsessa '), the mountains and the river form nothing like a defile.
Polybius mentions a range of hills called Eribanus, but we are unable to
identify it. On the whole, it is utterly impossible for us to ascertain accurately
the movements of Hannibal from Apulia to Campania and back again, owing
partly to the obscurity or the contradictions of the several historians, partly
to our ignorance of the ancient geography of Italy. Livy (xxii. 13) relates
that Hannibal intended to march from Apulia to Casinum in Latium, but, by a
mistake of his guides, was taken to Casilinum. This story is no doubt
without the least foundation. It looks like a camp anecdote, and is in every
respect improbable.
THE SECOND PUNIC WAE. 228
ginians, and, as he boasted in a report to the senate, he CHAP,
actually succeeded in gaining some advantages. Upon ^ ^^^' -
this news becoming known to the people, a storm of indig- ^^^
nation broke loose against Fabius. Had Bome fallen so 218-216
low, the people asked, that they must give up Italy as a ^^'
helpless prey to the haughty invader, that they must suffer
him to march unopposed wherever he listed through the
length and breadth of the peninsula, and to pillage and
waste it with his African, Spanish, and Gaulish hordes ?
Surely it was not the duty of a Roman army to follow the
enemy, to keep cautiously in a safe camp, and quietly to look
on whilst the whole country was being devastated. How
could it be expected that the allies would remain faith-
ful in their allegiance if they were left exposed to all
the horrors of war? Were not the Roman soldiers men of
the same race that had repeatedly struck down the Gauls,
and in a war of twenty years had wrested Sicily from these
Carthaginians ? But there was no doubt of the warlike
spirit of the soldiers ; the general only lacked resolution
and courage. Minucius had just shown that Hannibal
was not unconquerable, and if only the brave master of the
horse had freedom of action, perhaps the disastrous war
might now be ended with one blow.*
Such views found favour in Rome, especially with the The
multitude, which felt most keenly the pressure of war, and '"^^^^'^
was already impatient for peace. In the assembly of shared
the tribes, accordingly, the foolish proposal was made to t^tween
equalise Minucius and Fabius in the command of the *hedic-,
tator and
army ; that is to say, to destroy that unity of direction and the master
authority which gave its chief value to the dictatorship in ?^ ^^^
comparison with the divided command of the consuls. In
the old time, when the office of the dictator was better un-
derstood as an embodiment of the majesty and authority of
the whole state, it would have been impossible thus to curtail
the dictatorial power. Now, however, the terrible disasters
of the war had produced the effect which may be observed
in the case of sick persons who have tried several remedies
* LiTj, zxii. 25.
224
KOMAN HISTOKY.
BOOK
IV.
Defeftt of
Minudus.
Eflectsof
tbepolicy
of Fabiiis.
in vain, and are almost given up for lost. The ttBual and
regular treatment is abandoned, and the chance remedy of
some impudent quack is adopted in sheer despair. The
Boman people, generally so sober, composed, and self-col-
lected, so conservative and so full of confidence in their
ancient institutions, suddenly became reckless innovators
and undid their own work.
On his return into ApuUa. Fabins made aa arrangement
with Minucius to the effect that the legions should be
divided between them, and that each should act indepen-
dently of the other. Fabius continued in his old practice,
and, fortunately for Rome, kept near Minucius. The latter
was burning with impatience to show what he could do
now that he was no longer hampered by the old pedant's
timidity. Hannibal was delighted at the prospect of a
battle which he had been anxious to bring about with the
whole Boman army, and which was now offered by one-half
of it. He again chose the battle-field with his accustomed
skill, and concealed a body of 5,000 men in ambush.
The battle was quickly decided, and would have ended in
a rout of the Romans as complete as that of the Trebia,
if Fabius had not come up just in time to cover the retreat
of his rival. ^ Minucius felt so shamed and humbled that
he laid down his independent command, and voluntarily
resumed his position as master of the horse imder the
dictator, until, after the expiration of the six months of ex-
traordinary command, both abdicated and handed over the
legions to the consul of the year, Cn. Servilius, and his col-
league, M. Attilins Regulus, who had in the meantime been
elected in the place of I'laminius. The situation of affairs
in Apulia remained unaltered. Hannibal, in his camp
before Geronium, awaited the winter with well-filled maga-
zines. The Romans contented themselves with watching
his movements, and both parties made their preparations
for the campaign of the ensuing year (216 B.C.).
The skill, caution, and firmness of Fabius had given
Rome time to recover from the stunning blow of the
' Liv7» zzii. 28.
THE SECOND PUNIC WAR.
225
battle on tlie Thrasymenus, and to regain self-possession
and confidence. Much was profited by the mere fact that
the war came to a sort of standstill ; and the reputation
which the *cunctator* Fabius acquired, even among his
contemporaries, of having saved Rome from ruin * is not
quite undeserved, though it is clear that his mode of war-
fare was imperatively commanded by the circumstances in
which he found himself. After the annihilation of the army
of Flaminius, Bome was not in a position to meet the
conqueror again in the field, even if all the troops had
been recalled from Spain, Sicily, and Sardinia. It was
necessary to create a new army, to accustom it to war, and
to inspire it with courage. Only two new legions were
raised. These, added to the two legions of Servilius,
formed an army which in numbers may have equalled
that of Hannibal, but could not be compared with it in
experience, self-reliance, and general efficiency. It would
have been madness, with such an army as this, to risk a
battle, only a few months after the terrible disaster which
had befallen Flaminius. If, nevertheless, the Soman people
began to grow impatient and to clamour for a battle and
a victory, we must remember they were no wiser than
the populace generally is, and that they were already
suflfering grievously from the calamities and burdens of
war.
But the Eoman senate was far indeed from losing its
firmness and its wonted spirit of haughty defiance. Indeed,
the greatest danger that could threaten the safety of the
CHAP.
Vlll.
First
Period,
218-216
B.C.
Spirit
of the
Eoman
senate.
' The verse of Ennius (Cicero, Offio. i. 24) is well known : ' Unus homo
nobis cunctando restituit rem.' It was probably in this year of his pro-
dictatorship that the senate voted him a crown of grass (corona graminea),
the highest military distinction which was awarded to a general who had
saved a besieged town. Gellius says {N. A. v. 6) : ' Hanc coronam gramineani
senatus populusque Romanns Q. Fabio Maximo dedit bello Poenonim secundo
quod urbem Komanam obsidione hostium liberasset.' According to Pliny
{Hist, Nat. xxii. 6), the grass crown was decreed * Hannibale ex Italia pulw.'
But this seems hardly possible, if it be true, as Plutarch relates {Fab. Max. 27),
that Fabius fell sick and died irtfA hy xpoyoy *Ayylfias &in)pcy i^ *lra\las.
Livy also gives the year (203) of Hannibal's departure from Italy as that of
the death of Fabius.
VOL. II. Q
226 KOMAN HISTORY.
BOOK commonwealth had not yet shown itself. The Itoman
allies and subjects as yet exhibited no symptom of re-
bellion, and as long as these remained faithfal, the victories
of Hannibal produced only military advantages which
might at any time be counterbalanced by the fortune of
war. It was therefore of the first importance to keep
alive among the allies the old faith in the power of Bome,
and not to yield one inch of that proud position which
accepted faith and obedience as a natural duty, and not as
a benefit. In this spirit the senate met an ofier of some
Greek cities,* which sent golden vessels from their temples
to Rome as a voluntary contribution towards the expenses
of the war. The senate accepted the smallest of the
presents, in order to honour the intention of the allies, and
returned the remainder with thanks and with the assurance
that the Roman commonwealth did not require any aid.
The aged King Hiero of Syracuse, zealous as ever in his
■ political attachment to Rome, sent a golden image of the
Goddess of Victory, 300,000 bushels {modii) of wheat,
200,000 of barley, and 1 ,000 archers and slingers. This
gift was not refused. The golden Victory was placed for
a good omen in the temple of the Capitoline Jupiter.
The supplies of grain and the auxiliary troops were
accepted as a tribute due to the protecting state.* In. the
course of the year ambassadors were sent to the king of
Macedonia, to demand the surrender of Demetrius of
Pharos, who had taken refuge with him. The king of
the lUyrians was reminded to pay the tribute due to Rome,
and the Ligurians were warned to abstain from hostilities
again^it the Roman republic. At the same time the
Operations maritime war and the war in Spain were carried on with
Scip'M) vigour. In the latter country the campaign of 217 B.C.
in Spain, j^ad been opened successfully. Cn. Scipio sailed from
Tarraco southwards with a fleet of thirty-five vessels, in
which number there were a few fast-sailing galleys of
> Of Nea polls and Papstum CLivy, xxii. 32, 36).
* Livy, xxii. 37. Valerius Maximus, iv. 8, ext. 1. Zonaras, viii. 26.
THE SECOND PUNIC WAK.
227
CHAP.
VIII.
First
Period.
218-216
B.C.
MassUia,' tind defeated at the mouth of the Ebro a
superior Carthaginian fleet of forty ships of war, causing
them a loss of twenty-five ships.^ Afber this, when a
Carthaginian fleet of seventy sail cruised off Pisa, in the
expectation of falling in with Hannibal,' one hundred and
twenty Boman ships were sent from Ostia against them
imder the command of the consul Servilius. But the
Boman consul, not being able to find the Carthaginian
fleet in the Tyrrhenian Sea, sailed to LilybsBum, and
thence to the coast of Africa. In the smaller Syrtis he
landed on the island of Meninx, which he plundered, and
from the island of Cercina he exacted a contribution of
war amounting to 10,000 silver talents. He even ventured
to land on the coast of Africa, but was repulsed with great
loss.* Having, on his return voyage, taken possession of
the small island of Cossyra, he landed at Lilybseum, and
proceeded by the land route through Sicily and southern
Italy to Rome, in order, after the expiration of the dictator-
ship of Fabius, to assume the command of the army in
Apulia with his colleague Atilius Begulus.
Meanwhile Publius Scipio, the consul of the year 218, Dispatch
had been sent to Spain with a reinforcement of thirty fo^^gro^ntg
vessels and 8,000 men.* The senate considered the war in for Spain.
Spain to be so important that, even after the annihilation
of the Flaminian army, when Hannibal seemed to be
threatening Home and was laying waste central Italy
without opposition, this considerable force was with-
drawn from the protection of Italy and sent to that distant
country. The Romans thought that Hannibal would be
isolated and powerless in Italy, if they could but prevent
reinforcements being sent to him from Spain. The two
* The co-operation of Greek ressels is mentioned so rarely that it might
almost appear as an exception. But we refer to toI. i. pp. 275, 276, note 1.
* Polybius, iii. 95 ff. Livy, xxii. 19 ff.
* It was probably this fleet that capttired the Boman transports destined for
Spain. See above, p. 213»
* Liyy, xxii. 31.
* Livy, xxii. 22. Folybins does not mention the SjOOO men, and gives the
Bunber of ships as twenty.
q2
228
ROMAN mSTOBY.
BOOK
IV.
Ciril dis-
sennions
at Rome.
brothers Scipio carried on the war in that country not less
by the arts of persuasion than by the force of arms. They
endeavoured to gain the friendship of the numerous inde-
pendent tribes, and they skilfully availed themselves of
the discontent which the recently imposed dominion of
Carthage had called forth. "Sot did they disdain to make
use of treason. It is related that a Spanish chief, called
Abelux, in order to gain the favour of the Bomans, delivered
into their hands a number of Spanish hostages, which
were then detained by the Carthaginians in Saguntum.
These hostages the Scipios sent back to their friends, and
thus gained for themselves the reputation of generosity
without any cost or sacrifice. Their military enterprises
were confined to a few expeditions into the country south
of the Ebro, which, however, did not result in any serious
collision with the Carthaginians.
K ever there was a time when unity was necessary
among the citizens of Borne, to avert the threatened down-
fall of the republic, it was in the first few years of the
Hannibalian war. Even the unconditional abandonment
of party spirit and the most hearty and devoted patriotism
seemed hardly able to save the commonwealth. Nevertheless
it was precisely at this time that dissension showed itself
again, and that civil discord threatened to break out.
Flaminius had been raised to the consulship chiefly as
leader of the democratic party. If he had been able to
defeat Hannibal, the popular cause would at the same
time have triumphed over the privileged class. But the
liberal politician happened to be an unsuccessfol general.
Through his defeat and death the nobility gained the
upper hand, and Pabius was chosen to restore its full
supremacy and prestige. This called forth in Bome a
violent opposition. His apparent timidity, his slowness
and indifference to the sufierings of the ravaged country,
supplied his opponents with grounds for laying to the
charge of the nobility the intentional prolongation of
the war, and enabled them at last to limit his dictatorial
power by the decree which raised Minucius to an inde-
THE SECOND PUNIC WAK.
229
CHAP.
VIII.
FlKST
Period,
218-216
B.C.
pendent command. This last imprudent measure Lad
been carried chiefly through the influence of C. Terentius
Varro, a man who, in spite of his low birth, had been
raised successively to several of the high of&ces of the
republic, from the qusestorship upwards, and was now
actually a candidate for the consulship.* He evidently
enjoyed the fall confidence of the people, and he was
consequently elected for the year 216, in spite of the
opposition of the nobility, whilst of three patrician can-
didates none obtained a sufficient number of votes. Thus
Varro, being alone elected, held the comitia for the elec-
tion of a colleague, and used his influence in favour of
Lucius ^milius Paullus, a man of well-known military
capacity. Paullus had, three years before, commanded in
lUyria,' and had in a very short time brought that war to a
successful issue ; he had afterwards been suspected of dis-
honesty in the division of the spoil, but had escaped con-
demnation, and now enjoyed the confidence of the nobility
in fuller measure, as, in opposition to the plebeian Varro,
he represented the principles of the old families. The
annalists have accordingly shown him especial favour, and
have done their best to throw the blame for the great
misfortune that was about to befall Eome on the shoulders
of his colleague Varro, the butcher's son.^
It had become evident that Hannibal could not be Enrolment
conquered by a Roman army of equal strength. Pour J;foman^
legions opposed to him could do no more than watch and army.
' He was quaestor, plebeian and curule sedile, and pisetor. Whether he ever
was tribune of the people is doubtful.
' A law had been passed in 342 b.c., forbidding the re-election of a person
to the same magistracy within ten years (Livy, vii. 42, x. 13 ; see vol. i. p. 345) ;
but in times of danger this law was set aside, and a law moved by the consid
On. Servilius had suspended it for the period of the Hannibalian war. See «
Livy, xxvii. 6 : ' On. Servilio consule, ex auctoritate patrum ad plebem latum
plebemque scivisse, ut quoad helium in Italia eBset, ex iis qui consules fuissent,
quos et quotiens vellet reficiendi consules populo ius esset.'
' It is not at all probable that, as Mommsen says (Bom, Gesch. i. 610 ;
English translation, ii. 128), ' Varro was recommended by nothing but his low
birth and his coarse impudence.' Compare the just remarks of Arnold, Hist, of
Rome, iii. 129; Dion Cassius, fr. 49; Livy. xxiii. 25, 32; xxiv. 10, 11, 41 ;
XXV. 3, 6 ; xxvii. 24, 35; xxx. 26; xxxi. 11, 49.
230 ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK embarrass his movements, and limit his freedom of foraging
> ^ — and of plundering the country, even though they might,
under favourable circumstances, venture to attack detached
portions of the enemy. This had been the practice of
Fabius ; it had answered its purpose for the time, but it
was not calculated to bring the war to an end, and, by
exposing the Italians for an indefinite period to the
calamities of war, it tried their fidelity too long. The
Bomans now resolved to end this state of things before it
was too late, and before either the allies should revolt or
reinforcements reach Hannibal from Africa or Spain. The
senate resolved to add four new legions to those of the
preceding year, and to raise the strength of each legion
from 4,200 foot and 200 horse to 5,000 foot and 300 horse.
Thus the army opposed to Hannibal numbered, with the
allies, not less than 80,000 foot and 6,000 horse. It was a
force larger than any that Bome had ever sent against an
enemy. On the Trebia and the Thrasymenus the Roman
armies had reached only half that strength, and in the
earlier wars a single consular army of two legions had
generally been suf&cient. But now the object was to
crush Hannibal by an overwhelming force, and the new
consuls received positive orders from the senate to offer a
battle.*
aaestion This was, indeed, not only advisable but absolutely neces-
o 8upp OS. gg^jy^ j^ voiTLj o^ ucarly 90,000 men could only with
the greatest difficulty be fed in a country which, almost
for a whole year, had been made to support both the
Boman and the Carthaginian armies, and which was no
doubt thoroughly exhausted. Moreover, Hannibal had,
before the arrival of the new consuls, left his position
near Greronium, and had seized the citadel of Cannse,
not fiir from the sea, on the south of the river Aufidus,
where the Bomans had established a magazine for the
supply of their army.' The eight legions were therefore
> Polybius, iii. 107, § 7; 108, § 2.
' Polybius, iii. 107, § 2. The annalists, /who approved of the alleged plan of
^milius Faullus to avoid a battle, gave an entirely different coloaxing to
THE SECOND PUNIC WAR. 231
obliged to retire to another part of the country, or to CHAP,
risk a battle. wl^
According to the account of the Boman annalists, which ^^sr
Polybius adopted,* the two consuls could not agree on the 218-216
plan of battle to be adopted. Varro, carried away, it was ^'^'
said, with blind self-confidence,* hurried on a decision, as ^^^'"^^
soon as the hostile armies were in front of each other, Eoman
whilst the more cautious iBmilius, following in the foot- *'™^'
steps of Fabius, urged that they should avoid a battle in
the plains of JLpulia, where Hannibal's superior cavalry had
free scope to act. But the successfulness of a skirmish
among the outposts had the effect, perhaps intended by
Hannibal,' of raising the courage of the Bomans and in-
ducing them to move forward. They now established their
camp on the right bank of the Aufidus, not far from the
camp of Hannibal.
The two consuls had the chief command of the army in Defects
turn on alternate days. This arrangement, which seemed military
purposely devised to exclude uniformity and systematic ^^»^^
order from the strategic movements, may have been good
enough in a war with barbarians ; but in a contest with
Hannibal it went far towards neutralising all the advan-
tages which the innate courage of the Bomans and their
great superiority in numbers gave them. It is no doubt
an exaggeration that Yarro alone was responsible for the
these events, which altogether perrerted the tnith. AccoidiDg to them, the
Eomans had abundance of provisions, whilst Hannibal was short of them.
Livy (xxii. 43) goes so far as to say that great discontent prevailed in
Hannibal's army, and a disposition to mutiny and treason, and that Hannibal,
in despair, had formed the plan of returning with the cavaliy to Gaul. It
was the intention of the writers who reported these idle tales to cofndemn the
strategy of Varro, and to make him answerable for the great disaster.
> Polybius, iii. 116.
' Mommsen (Rom, Gesch, i. 611 ; English translation, ii« 129) improTee
upon the vituperative tone of the Roman annalists : ' It was necessaiy/ he
says, ' to allow the hero of the pavement to have his way/
' Livy, xxii. 41 : ' Hannibal id damnum baud eegerrime pati ; quin potius
credere velut inescatam temeritatem ferocioris consulis ac novomm maxime
militum esse.' Zonaras, ix. 1 : ^kvyifias kKiov 6ir«x(^/>^^(''» ^^^^ Ititivai yofua$«U
iwunrdureuro ftaXAoF wbrohs f is fopdra^iy^
232
EOMAN HISTORY.
BOOK
IV.
Move-
ments of
The coDsal
iGmilius.
advancing movement of the Boman army into the imme-
diate proximity of the enemy, and for the necessity of
accepting the battle which was the inevitable result. It
appears, on the contrary, that both Paullus and Varro, in
conformity with the orders of the senate and by the force
of circumstances, made no attempt to avoid a battle ; but
if the views of the two consuls did not agree in every
respect, if one of them hurried on the decision whilst the
other preferred to wait for ever so short a time, it is
possible that one of them could compel his colleague to
accept the very conditions of battle which he had from
the first disapproved.
The two armies were now so near each other that a
ba.ttle was inevitable; and this was clear to ^milius
Paullus himself. On the day, therefore, on which he had
the supreme command he divided fhe legions, and passed
with about one-third of his forces from the camp which
was on the right bank of the Aufidus, to the left bank,
where, a short distance lower down and nearer to the
enemy, he erected a second and smaller camp.^ This
* PolybiuB, iii. 110, § 8. Unfortunately the expreBsions of Polybius are
again vague (see above, p. 172), and leave it doubtful on which side of the
river the larger and Bmaller camps were respectively placed. He a&ya : Eir
9h r^v healpiov 6 At^Kios o&re fiix*^^ Kpivav^ olrre /iV kTciyeiv aff^aXSn t^y
arparikif frt ^vydftfuos rots fi^v 9va\ fi4p€<ri KarcoTparoircScvo'c v^aph rhv AC^iioy
myrafxSv . . . . r^ di rpirtp wtpav^ birh rrts ^tafidirtws irp6s r&r kyaroKdtt
ifidKfTO ;i^({f)aica, r^s fi^y Ulas Topc/i/SoA^s irepl diKa (TtqSIous iaroaxi&Vi t^$ ^^
T&y httevayriiav fuxp^ ir\(7oy. Further on he says of Hannibal (ch. Ill, § 11) :
iroio^ftCKOs r^K x^P<^^ ^<^P^ '''^^ fi^^'r^y x\€vp6.y rov xorafiov rp fi€l(oyi
arparowtHtlq, r&y tfrtyayriwy. It looks almost as if Polybius had inten-
tionally avoided the decisive words right and left His words leave the
position of the two camps, and consequently the locality of the battle, quite
undetermined. We must therefore try to fix it from other data. As we see
from Livy (xzii. 43), Hannibal was encamped near Canne, i.e. on the right
bank of the Aufidus. Nothing is said of his moving to the other side of the
river, until he crossed on the day of battle (Livy, xxii. 46 ; Polybius, iii.
113, § 6). This alone proves conclusively that the field of battle was on the
left bank. Moreover Polybius states that the Romans had their right wing
on the river, and the Carthaginians the left. If, with this position, the two
armies had been drawn up on the right bank, it would follow that the Romans
had actually marched past the Carthaginian army and were now standing
between it and the sea. Nothing is reported of such an extraordinary and
dangerous manoea^TO. Nevertheless Arnold (Hist of'Bomej iii. p. 185)
THE SECOND PUNIC WAR. 233
movement towards the Carthaginian army was evidently CHAP.
a challenge, and shows very clearly with what degree - , '
of security and self-confidence the Boman armies could p^?^
manoeuvre in the immediate neighbourhood of the enemy.* 218-216
Hannibal was highly delighted at the resolution of the **^
Komans. A whole year had passed since the battle on
the lake Thrasymenus, a year in which all his attempts
to bring on a battle had been vain. Now, at length,
his wish was gratified, and, confident of success, he looked
forward to the great passage of arms which was to
arbitrate between his own country and her deadly foe.
In Bome the collision between the two armies was State of
looked for day after day, and the town was in the most R^mef ^^
anxious suspense. After the repeated disasters of the last
two years, the confident expectation of victory was gone.
Like a desperate gambler, Bome had now doubled her
stake; and if fortune went against her once more, it
seemed that all must be irrecoverably lost. At such
times man feels keenly his dependence on higher powers.
The Bomans especially were liable to convulsions of
superstitious fear ; they were, as Polybius says, * powerful
in prayers ; when great dangers threatened, they implored
gods and men for help, and thought no practices unbe-
coming or unworthy of them that are usual under such
circumstances.* Accordingly the population was feverish
with religious excitement ; the temples were crowded, the
assumes it as certaio, as ho is obliged to do, because he places the battle on
the right bank. Now there appears to be no inducement for the selection of
this bank as the field of battle beyond the statement of Polybius and livy
that the Roman army, leaning with their right wing on the river, had their
faces turned to the south. But, though the general course of the Aufidus is
from S.W. to N.E, there is near Cannae a decided bend in tlie river to the
S. or S.E., so that, even on the left bank of the river, the Komans could front
towards the south, and yet rest on the river with their right wing.
' Compare above, p. 204.
' Polybius, iii. 112, § 9: itiyol yiip iy to7s v€ptordafffi 'P»fi€uot ica) 0coiw
i^i\dffK€(rBeu Koi^ kyBp^ovs ical fitfi^y &irp«ir^s /11178* iytkifh iv rots roiovrois
Kutpolt ffytTaOai r&v inpi ravra ffvrr€\ovfi4iftifv, Virgil (^n. iii. 260) makes
^neas say of his companions:
' Cecidere animi nee iam amplius armis
Sed Totis precibusque iubent exposcere pacem.'
234 ROMAN HISTORY.
^?v ^ gods besieged with prayers and sacrifices ; warnings and
^ r-^ — ' prophecies of old seers were in everybody's mouth, and
every honse and every heart was divided between hope
and fear.V
ThebatUe- The Aufidus (now called Ofanto) is the most con-
Cannae, siderable of the numerous coast-rivers which flow east-
ward from the Apennines into the Adriatic Sea ; but its
broad bed is filled only in winter and spring. It was now
the early part of summer, about the middle of June ; and
the river was so narrow and shallow that it could be
crossed everywhere without any serious difficulty. In the
neighbourhood of the smaller Boman camp the Aufidus
made a sudden sharp bend towards the south or south-
east, and after a short distance turned again to the north-
east, which is the general direction of its course. Here,
on the left or northern bank, was the battle-field selected
by Varro. In the larger camp on the right bank of the
river, and a little way higher up, he left only a garrison of
10,000 men, with orders to attack, during the battle, the
Carthaginian camp, which was on the same side of the
river, and thus to divide the attention and the forces of
the enemy. With the remainder of his infantry and 6,000
horse he crossed the Aufidus, and drew up his army in
the usual manner, having the legions in the middle and
the cavalry on the wings, with his front looking south-
ward and the river on his right. As the infantry con-
sisted of eight legions, the fix)nt ought to have had twice
the length of two usual consular armies. But instead of
doubling the breadth of front Varro doubled the depth,
probably for the purpose of asing the new levies, not for
the attack, but for increasing the pressure of the attacking
column. Thus it happened that, in spite of the great
numerical superiority of the Bomans, they did not present
a broader front than the Carthaginians. On the right
flank of the infantry, leaning on the river, stood the
Boman horse, which contained the sons of the noblest
' Compare Livy, zxii. 36, 57*
THE SECOND PUNIC WAE. 235
families, and formed the flower of the army. The much CHAV.
more numerous cavaby of the allies was stationed on the •_^
left wing. Before the front there were, as usual, the light p^^^,
troops, which always began the engagement, and retired 218-216
through the intervals of the heavy infantry behind the ^'^'
line after they had discharged their weapons. The
Boman cavalry on the right was commanded by Paullus,
and the cavalry of the allies on the left wing by Varro,
while Cn. Servilius, the consul of the preceding year, and
Minucius, the master of the horse under Fabius, led the
legions in the centre.
As soon as Hannibal saw that the Romans offered battle, Bisposi-
he also led his troops, 40,000 foot and 10,000 horse, carthL^^*
across the river, which he had now in his rear. In taking ginian
this position he risked no more than his situation at the
time warranted, for he knew that a defeat would, under
any circumstances, end in the total destruction of his army.
He drew up his infantry opposite the Roman legions ; but,
instead of forming them in a straight line, he advanced the
Spaniards and Gauls in a semicircle in the centre, placing
the Africans on their right and left, but at some distance
behind them. On his left wing, by the bank of the Aufid.us,
and opposed to the Roman cavalry, were the heavy Spanish
and Gaulish horse, under Hasdrubal ; on the right, under
Hanno, the light Numidians.' Hannibal, with his brave
brother Mago, took his position in the centre of his infan-
try, to be able to survey and to guide the battle in every
direction. Hir African infantry was armed in the Roman
fashion with the spoils of his previous victories; the
Spaniards wore white linen coats with red borders, and
carried short straight swords, fit for cut and thrust ; the
Gauls, naked down to the waist, brandished their long
sabres, suitable only for cutting. The aspect of these
huge barbarians, who had after the recent battles regained
the prestige of bravery and invincibility, could not fail to
make a deep impression upon the Roman soldiers, and to
* Polybius, iii. 114, § 7. Appian, yii. 20. Accoidmg to Livy (xxii. 46),
Maharbal commanded the Numidianf .
236 BOMAN HISTORY.
BOOK fill them with anxiety and misgivings for the result of the
w /. - impending conflict.
Defeat of The sun had been two hours risen when the battle began,
cavalry. When the light skirmishers had been scattered, the heavy
horsemen of the Carthaginians dashed, in close ranks and
with an irresistible shock, upon the Eoman cavalry. For
one moment these stood their ground, man against man,
and horse against horse, as if they were welded into one
compact mass. Then this mass began to waver and to be
broken up. The Gauls and Spaniards forced their way
amongthe disorganised squadrons of their antagonists, and
cut them down almost to a man. Pushing forward, they
soon found themselves in the rear of the Eoman infantry,
and fell upon the allied cavalry on the left wing of the
Eomans, which was at the same time attacked in front by
the Kumidians. Their appearance in this quarter soon
decided the contest here ; the allied horsemen were driven
off the field. Hsisdrubal intrusted their pursuit to the
Numidians, and fell with all his forces upon the rear of the
Eoman infantry, where the young inexperienced troops
were placed, of whom many had never yet met an enemy
in the field.
Destruc- Meanwhile the Boman infantry had driven in the
tion of the Spaniards and Gauls who formed the advanced centre of
infantry, the Carthaginian line. Pressing against them from the
right and the left, the Eomans contracted their front more
and more, and advanced like a wedge against the retiring
centre of the Carthaginian army. When they were on
the point of breaking through it, the African infantry on
the right and left fell upon the Koman flanks. At the
same time the heavy Spanish and Gaulish cavalry broke
upon them from behind, and the retiring hostile infantry
in front returned to the charge. Thus the huge unwieldy
masses of the Koman infantry were crowded upon one
another in helpless confusion and surrounded on all sides.
Whilst the outer ranks were falling fast, thousands stood
idle in the centre, pressed close against each other, unable
THE SECOND PUNIC WAR. 237
to strike a blow, penned in like sheep, and doomed to wait CHAP,
patiently until it should be their turn to be slaughtered.
Never before had Mars, the god of battle, gorged himself p,'^
so greedily with the blood of his children. It seems 218-216
beyond comprehension that in a close combat, man to man,
the conquerors could strike down with cold steel more than
their own number. The physical exertion alone must have
been almost superhuman. The carnage lasted nearly the
whole day. Two hours before the sun went down, the
Boman army was annihilated, and more than one-half of
it lay dead on the field of battle. The consul ^milius
Faullus had been wounded at the very beginning of the
conflict, when his horsemen were routed by the Cartha-
ginian horse. Then he had endeavoured, in spite of his
wound, to rally the infantry and to lead them to the
charge ; but he could not keep his seat in the saddle, and
fell, unknown, in the general slaughter. The same fate
overtook the proconsul Cn. Servilius, the late master of
the horse Minucius, two qusestors, twenty-one military
tribunes, and not less than eighty senators — an almost
incredible number, which shows that the Roman senate
consisted not only of talking but also of fighting men,
and was well qualified to be the head of a warlike people.
The consul Terentius Varro, who had commanded the
cavalry of the allies on the left wing, escaped with about
seventy horsemen to Venusia.
It was not Hannibal's custom to leave his work half- 9*P^ ^^
done. Immediately after the battle he took the larger camps.
Boman camp. The attack which its garrison of 1 0,000
men had made on the Carthaginian camp during the
battle had failed; and the Bomans, driven back behind
their ramparts, and despairing of being able to resist the
victorious army, were compelled to surrender. The same
fate befell the garrison and the fugitives who had sought
shelter in the smaller camp. Nevertheless, the number
of prisoners was very small in comparison with that of the
slain ; it amounted to about 10,000 men. In Canusium,
238
ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK
IV.
Effecte of
the battle
of Cannae.
Venusia, and other neighbouring towns, about 3,000
fugitives were rallied. Many more were dispersed in all
directions. This unparalleled victory, which surpassed his
boldest expectations, had cost Hannibal not quite 6,000
men, and among them only two hundred of the brave
horsemen to whom it was principally due.*
Great as was the material loss of the Bomans in this
most disastrous battle, it was less serious than the effect
produced by it upon the morale of the Boman people.
Throughout the whole course of the war they never
quite recovered from the shock which their courage and
self-confidence had sustained. From this time forward
Hannibal was invested in their eyes with supernatural
powers. They could no longer venture to face* him
like a common mortal enemy of flesh and blood. Their
knees trembled at the very mention of his name, and
the bravest man felt unnerved at the thought of his
presence. This dread stood Hannibal in the place of
a whole armv, and did battle for him when the war
had carried 'off his African and Spanish Teterans, and
when Italian recruits made up the bulk of his forces.
How stupified and bewildered the Romans felt by the
stunning blow at Cannae may be seen from one striking
' Then? are, as may be expected, consideraWo variations among our in-
formants as to the losses of the two armies in the battle. According to
Polybius (iii. 117), 72,000 Komans were killed, 20,000 taken, and no more
tlian 4,000 escaped, Livy (xxii. 49) makes the loss of the Komans to consist
of 45,000 infantry and 2,700 cavalry killed, 3,000 infantry and 1,500 cavalry
taken in the battle. 2,000 men taken in Cannae, and 16,400 in the two camps ;
the total loss, therefore, 48,200 killed and 22,900 prisoners, or 71,100 men.
According to him (xxii. 52, 54), about 14,000 escaped. This agrees with the
statement (xxii. 36) that the strength of the army was 87,200, for this leaves
only 2,100 men as * missing.' The statement of Livy has the appearance of
greater accuracy, and agrees better than that of Polybius, at least as far as
the fugitives are concerned, with what we are told in the course of the war of
the Megiones Cannenses,' which, as a punishment for their behaviour at
Cannae, were condemned to serve in Sicily without pay to the end of the war.
The stat4%ment8 of the loss of the Carthaginians vary only between 6,000
and 8,000.
' The Greeks called this with an expressive term hrro^tBaXfitiy. Still
stronger is the Shakesperian term * outstare.' See Merchant qf Venice, ii. 1 :
' I would outstare the sternest eyes that look.'
THE SECOND PUNIC WAR. 239
instance.* Several Eoman knights, young men of the chap.
first families, had so completely lost all hope of saving >, , '
their country from utter ruin, that in their despair p^^^
they conceived the wild plan of escaping to the sea- 218-216
coast, and seeking shelter in some foreign country. From "*^'
this dishonourable plan they were diverted only by the
energetic intervention of the youthful P. Cornelius Scipio,
who, forcing his way among- them, is said to have
drawn his sword, and threatened to run through any
one that refused to take an oath never to abandon his
country.
The patriotic annalists did all that they could to assign Causes
as the cause of the Eoman defeat the perfidious cunning of ^^^^^^p
the Punians. This intention becomes especially evident writers for
in Appian's description of the battle, and in his concluding defeat.™*"
remarks.^ It was related' that Hannibal placed a body
of men in an ambush, and that during the battle these
men attacked the Romans in the rear ; moreover, that five
hundred Numidians* or Celtiberians* approached the
Roman lines under the pretext of desertion, and being
received without suspicion, and left unguarded in the
heat of the battle, attacked the Romans and threw them
into confusion. Nature itself was made to favour the
Carthaginians and to help them to gain the victory, like
the cold weather on the Trebia and the mist at the lake
Thrasymenus. A violent south wind carried clouds of dust
into the faces of the Romans, without in the least in-
commoding the Carthaginians, whose front looked north-
ward.^ According to Zonaras,^ Hannibal had actually
calculated upon this fidendly wind, and to increase its
efficacy he had on the previous day caused the land which
lay to the south of the battle-field to be ploughed up. In
' Liry, xxii. 63. • Appian, vii. 26.
' Zonaras, ix. i. Poljbins knows nothing of thid.
* Liry, xxii. 48. ■ Appian, vii. 20.
* Plutarch, Fah, 16. It appears that Enniua, in his epic poem, bad dwelt
upon this circumstance, as may be gathered from the fragment (viii. 9,
edit. Vahlen). ' lamque fere pulyis ad coelum vasta videtur.*
' Zonaras, iz. 1.
240
ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK
IV.
The
Roman
allies.
Dispoei-
tion of
Hannibal
towards
the
Romans.
such silly stories some writers sought consolation for
' their wounded feelings; but on the whole it must be
confessed that the Boman people, though writhing and
suffering under the blows of Hannibal, and deeply wounded
in their national pride, admitted their defeat frankly, and
instead of falsifying it, or obliterating it from their
memory, were spurred on by it to new courage and to
a perseverance which could not fail to lead in the end
to victory.
The overthrow at Cannse was so complete that every
other nation but the Bomans would at once have given up
the idea of further resistance.* It seemed that the pride
of Bome must now at last be humbled, and that she was
as helplessly at the mercy of the invader as after the fatal
battle on the Allia. What chance was there now of
resisting this foe, whose victories became only the more
crushing as the ranks of the legions became more dense ?
Since he had appeared on the south side of the Alps, no
Boman had been able to resist him, and every successive
blow which he had dealt had been harder. It seemed
impossible that Italy could any longer bear within her
own limits such an enemy as the Punic army. If Bome
was unable to protect her allies, they had no alternative
but to perish or to join the foreign invader.
This was from the beginning Hannibal's calculation ;
and now it appeared that his boldest hopes were about to
be realised, and that the moment of revenge for the wrongs
of Carthage was approaching. Nevertheless this truly
great man was not swayed by the feeling that he might
now indulge in the pleasure of retaliation. More than this
pleasure he valued the safety and the welfare of his country,
and he was ready to sacrifice his personal feelings to
higher considerations. In spite of his victories, he had
learnt to appreciate the superior strength of Borne ; and
instead of still further trying the fortune of war, he resolved
now, in the full career of victory, to seize the first oppor-
' Livj (zxii. 51) does not exaggerate in sajing: * Nulla profecto alia gens
tanta mole cladis non obruta esset.'
THE SECOND PUNIC WAR. 241
tunity for concluding peace. His envoy, Carthalo, who CHAP,
went to Eome to negotiate about the ransom of the Boman s^ , '^
prisoners, was commissioned by him to show his readiness Y^i^n
for entertaining any proposals of peace which the Eomans 218-216
might be willing to make. But Hannibal did not know
the spirit of the Boman people, if he thought that it was
broken now ; and he, like Pyrrhus, was to discover that he
had undertaken to fight with the Hydra.
The feverish excitement which prevailed in Home during Danger
the time of the expected conflict did not last very long. ^^^^
Messengers of evil ride fast. Though no official report was «»ty.
sent * by the surviving consul, the news of the defeat
reached Eome, nobody knew how, and the first rumour
went even beyond the extent of the actual calamity. It
was said that the whole army was annihilated, and both
consuls dead. On this dreadful day Eome was saved only
by the circumstance that the whole breadth of Italy lay
between it and the conqueror. If, as in the first Gallic
war, the battle had been fought within sight of the Capitol,
nothing could have saved the town from a second destruc-
tion, and Hannibal would not have been bought off, like
Brennus, with a thousand pounds of gold.
The Eoman people gave themselves up to despair. They Pre-
thought the last hour of the republic was come, and ^f Bju^te^
many who had lost their nearest friends or relatives in
the slaughter of battle may have been almost indifferent
as to any further calamities which might be in store
for them. The city was almost in a state of actual anar-
chy. The consuls, and most of the other magistrates, were
absent or dead. A small remnant only of the senate was
left in Eome. In one battle eighty senators had shed
their blood, and many, no doubt, were absent with the
armies in Gaul, Spain, Sicily, or elsewhere on public
service. In this urgency the senators who happened to
be on the spot took the reins of government into their
hands, and strove by ttieir calm and dignified firmness to
counteract the effects of the general consternation,
* Dion Cassius, fr. 49. Livy. xxii. 54-56.
VOL. 11. B
242
ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK Q. Fabins Maximus was the soul of ilieir deliberations.
^ r^ ' On his proposition the measures were determined upon
which the urgency of the danger required. Guards
were placed at the gates to prevent a general rush from
the city ; for it seemed that, as after the rout of the Allia,
174 years before, the terrified citizens thought of seeking
shelter elsewhere, and were giving up Some for lost.
Horsemen were dispatched on the Appian and Latin roads
to gather whatever tidings they could from messengers or
fugitives. All men who could give information were
brought before the authorities. Strict orders were given
to prevent vague alarm, and the women who filled the
streets with their lamentations were made to retire into
the interior of the houses. All assemblies and gatherings
of the people were broken up, and silence restored in the
city. At length a messenger arrived with a letter from
Varro, which revealed the extent of the calamity. Though
it confirmed, on the whole, the evil tidings which had anti-
cipated it, yet it contained some consolation. One consul
at least, and a portion of the army, had escaped ; and (what
was the most welcome news for the present) Hannibal was
not on his march to Rome, but still far away in Apulia,
busy with his captives and his booty.
Military Thus at least a respite was gained. The old courage
forcam- returned by degrees. The time for mourning the dead
ingonthe ^as limited to thirty days. Measures were taken for
raising a new force. A fleet was lying ready at Ostia, to
sail under the command of M. Claudius Marcellus to Sicily,
whence disquieting news had arrived that the Cartha-
ginians had attacked the Syracusan territory and were
threatening LilybsBum.^ Under the present circumstances
the anxiety for the safety of Sicily had to give place to the
care for the defence of the capital. A body of 1,500 troops
was transferred from the fleet at Ostia to garrison Rome,
and a whole legion * from the same naval force was ordered
* Livy, xxii. 66.
' We meet here (Livy, xxii. 67) with a novelty, a * legio classics,* called
the 'third, which was no doubt intended to serve on the fleet in naval
war.
B.C.
THE SECOND PUNIC WAE. 243
to march through Campania to Apulia for the purpose of CHAP,
collecting the scattered remains of the defeated army. ~_ , ' ^
With this legion Marcellus proceeded to Canusium, only -^^^
three miles from the fatal field of Cannae, and, relieving 218-216
Varro from the command in Apulia, requested him to return
to !Rome. The Boman historians relate, with national pride,
that all civil discord was at once buried in the present
danger of the commonwealth, that the senators went out
to meet the defeated consul, and expressed their thanks to
him for not despairing of the republic. Such sentiments
were honourable and worthy of the best days of Rome ;
but if it were true that Varro had caused the disaster of
Cannse by his folly and incapacity — if indeed he had forced
on the battle against the instructions of the senate and
the advice of his colleague — in that case the acknowledg-
ment of his merits, and the generous and conciliatory spirit
exhibited by the senate, would have been a virtue all the
more questionable inasmuch as it could not fail to have the
effect of re-instating Varro in the confidence of the people
aud of again intrusting him with high office. But we
have already been constrained to doubt the report of Varro's
incapacity,* and the conduct of the senate after the battle
of CannsB justifies this doubt. In the course of the war
Varro rendered his country many important services, and
he was always esteemed a good soldier.* On the present
occasion it is reported ' that the dictatorship was offered
to him, but that he refused it because he considered his
defeat at Cannse as a bad omen. Having nominated
M. Junius Pera dictator, he returned at once to the theatre
of war, leaving to the dictator the management of the
government, the levying of new troops, and the duty of pre-
siding over the election of the consuls for the ensuing year.
expeditions, such as those of Sempronius in the first jear of the war. (See
above, pp. 167, 183 ff.; cf. Livy, xxiy. 11, § 3: *Legionem Valerio ad classem
zelinqni '). In the beginning of the year, two legions had been raised from
the population of the town of Home alone, as we are informed by Livy (xxiii.
14). How these two legions were employed wo do not know. Perhaps the
third ' legio classica ' was one of them.
> See above, pp. 229, 231. * See above, p. 229, note 3.
' YaleriiiB Mazimus, iii. 4, 4 ; iv. 5, 2. Frontinus, iv. 6, 6.
B 2
244 KOMAN HISTORY.
Second Period of the Hannibalian War,
FROM THE BATTLE OP CANN-ffl TO THE REVOLUTION IN
BTKAOUSE, 216-216 B.C.
BOOK Unvarying success had accompanied Hannibal from the
• ^ first moment of his setting foot in Italy, and had risen
Position of l^igtcr and higher until it culminated in the crowning vic-
Hannibal tory at Cannse. From this time the vigour of Hannibal's
attack relaxes ; its force seems spent. The war continues,
but it is changed in character ; it is spread over a greater
space ; its unity and dramatic interest are gone. For Han-
nibal those difficulties begin which are inseparable from a
campaign in a foreign country at a great distance from
the native resources. His subsequent career in Italy is not
marked by triumphs on the colossal scale of the victories
at the Trebia, the Thrasymenus, and CannsB. He remains
indeed the terror of the Eomans, and scatters or crushes
on every occasion the legions that venture to oppose him
in the field, but, in spite of the insurrection of many of the
Boman allies and of the undaunted spirit of the Cartha-
ginian government, it becomes now more and more appa-
rent that the resources of Rome are superior to those of
her enemies. Gradually she rises from her fall. Slowly she
recovers strength and confidence. Yielding on no point,
she keeps up vigorously the defensive against Hannibal,
whilst she passes to the oflfensive in the other theatres of
war, in Spain, Sicily, and finally in Africa ; and, having
thoroughly reduced and weakened the strength of her
adversary, she deals a last and decisive blow against
Hannibal himself.
Tiie Unfortunately we lose after the battle of Cannse the
histories of most Valuable witness, on whom we have chiefly relied
I'd villus*
for the earlier events of the war. Of the great historical
work of Polybius only the first five books are preserved
entire, while of the remaining thirty- five we have only
THE SECOND PUNIC WAK. . 245
detached fragments, valuable indeed, but calculated more CHAP.
TTTTT
to make us feel the greatness of the loss than to satisfy ^
B.C.
our curiosity. Polybius has almost the authority of a con- ^^^
temporary writer, though the Hannibalian war was ended 216-216
when he was still a child. He wrote when the memory of
these events was fresh, and information could easily be
obtained — when exaggerations and lies, such as are found
in later writers, had not yet ventm:^d into publicity or
found credence. He was conscientious in sifting evidence,
in consulting documents, and visiting the scenes of the
events which he narrates. As a Greek writing on Koman
affairs, he was free from that national vanity which in
Koman annalists is often very offensive. Though he
admires Bome and Koman institutions, he brings to bear
upon his judgment the enlightenment of a man trained
in all the knowledge of Greece, and of a statesman and a
soldier experienced in the management of public affairs.
He is indeed not free from errors and faults. His intimate
friendship with some of the houses of the Roman nobility
biassed his judgment in favour of the aristocratic govern-
ment, and his connexion with Scipio -ffirailianus made him,
willingly or imconsciously, the panegyrist of the members
of that family. He is guilty of occasional oversights,
omissions, or errors, some of which we have noticed ; but,
taking him for all in all, he is one of our truest guides in the
history of the ancient world, and we cannot sufficiently re-
gret the loss of the greater part of his work. Fortunately
the third decade of Livy, which gives a connected account of
the Hannibalian war, is preserved, and we find in the frag-
ments of Dion Cassius, Diodorus, and Appian, and in the
abridgment of Zonaras, as well as in some other later ex-
tracts, occasional opportunities for completing our know-
ledge. But it cannot be denied that, with some exceptions,
the history of the war flags after the battle of Cannse. The
figure of Hannibal, the most interesting of all the actors
in that great drama, retires more into the background.
We know for certain that he was as great in the years of
comparative, or apparent, inactivity as in the time which
246
EOMAN HISTORY.
BOOK
IV.
Religious
ceremonies
at Rome.
ended with the triumph at Cannae; but we cannot follow
him into the recesses of southern Italy, nor watch his
ceaseless labours in organising the means and laying
the plans for carrying on the war in Italy, Sicily, Spain,
Greece, Gaul, and in all the seas. We know that he was
ever at work, ready at all times to pounce upon any Eoman
army that ventured too near him, terrible as ever to his
enemies, full of resources, unyielding in the face of multi-
plied difficulties, and unconquered in battle, until the com-
mand of his country summoned him from Italy to Africa.
But of the details of these exploits we have a very inade-
quate knowledge, partly because no history of the war
written on the Carthaginian side has been preserved,* and
partly because the full narrative of Polybius is lost.
The disaster of Cannae, it appears, had long been fore-
told, but the warnings of the friendly deity had been cast
to the winds. More than that, the Eoman people had been
guilty of a great offence. The altar of Vesta had been
desecrated. Two of her virgins had broken the vow of
chastity. It is true they had grievously atoned for their
sin : one had died a voluntary death, the other had suffered
the severe punishment which the sacred law imposed.
She was entombed in her grave alive, and left there to
perish ; the wretch who had seduced her was scourged to
death in the public market by the chief pontiff.^ But the
conscience of the people was not at ease. A complete
purification and an act of atonement seemed required to
relieve the feeling of guilt and to regain the favour of the
outraged deity. Accordingly an embassy was sent to
Greece to consult the oracle of Apollo at Delphi. The
chief of this embassy was Fabius Pictor, the first writer
who composed a continuous history of Rome from the
foundation of the city to his own time. But even before
the reply of the Greek god could be received, something
* Sosilos* work, r& ircpl 'Avyf/Sor, is lost. Comp. Polybius, iii. 20.
' Livy xxii. 57: 'L. Cantilius, scriba pontificis, qui cum Floronia stuprum
fecerat, a pontifice maximo eo usque rirgis in comitio csesus erat, ut inter verben
expiraret.'
THE .SECOND PUNIC WAR. 247
had to be done to calm the apprehensions of the public, CHAP,
and to set at rest their religious terrors. The Bomans
had national prophecies, preserved like the Sibylline books, |^^^
with which they were often confounded.^ These books of 216-216
fate were now consulted, and they revealed the pleasure ^'^'
of a barbarous deity, which again claimed, as during the
last Gallic war nine years before, to be appeased by human
sacrifices, A Greek man and a Greek woman, a Gaul
and a Gaulish woman were again buried alive. By such
cruel practices the leading men atBome showed that they
were not prevented by the influence of Greek civilisation
and enlightenment from working on the abject superstition
of the multitude, and from adding to their material
strength and patriotic devotion by religious fanaticism.
The superiority of Eome over Carthage lay chiefly in ^^ain of
the vast mOitary population of Italy, which in one way or the popu-
another was subject to the republic and available for the ^?^j^
purposes of war. At the time of the last enumeration, which
took place in 225 B.C. on the occasion of the threatened
Gaulish attack, the number of men capable of bearing arms
is said to have amounted to nearly 800,000, and in all pro-
bability that statement fell short of the actual number.^
Here was a source of power that seemed inexhaustible.
Nevertheless the war had hardly lasted two years before a
difficulty was felt to fill up the gaps which bloody battles had
made in the Boman ranks. Since the engagement on the
Ticinus the Bomans must have lost in Italy alone 120,000
men, actually slain or taken prisoners, without reckoning
those who succumbed to disease and the fatigues and priva-
tions of the prolonged campaigns. This loss was felt most
severely by the Boman citizens ; for these were kept by
Hannibal in captivity whilst the prisoners of the allies were
discharged. Whether the latter were enrolled again, we
' The Sibylline books were of Greek origin, but similar in character to the
native ' libri fatales/ on which they were, in a manner, engrafted, and with
which they formed one body of prophetic writings, in the keeping of the
decemviri (afterwards quindecimviri) sacris faciundis. See vol. i. p. 80.
' See the Appendix on the population of Italy, at the end of this Tolume.
248 BOMAN HISTORY.
BOOK are not informed. At any rate a corresponding number
of men was spared for the necessary domestic labour, for
agriculture and the various trades ; and consequently the
allies who remained faithful to Borne could more easily
replace the dead, although they also had already reached
that point of exhaustion where war begins to undermine,
not only the public welfare, but society itself in the first
conditions of its existence. Men capable of bearing arms
are, in other words, men capable of working; and it is upon
work that civil society and every political community is
finally based. If, therefore, only one-tenth of the labour
strength of Italy was consumed in two years, and if an-
other tenth was needed for carrying on the war, we may
form an idea of the fearful disorganisation which was
rapidly spreading over Italy, of the check to every sort of
productive industry at a time when the state, deprived of
so many of its most valuable citizens, was obliged to raise
its demands in proportion, and to exact more and more
sacrifices from the survivors. The prevalence of slavery
alone explains how it was possible to take away every
fifth man from peaceful occupations and employ him in
military service. The institution of slavery, though in-
compatible by its very nature with the moral or even the
material progress of man, and though always a social and
political evil of the worst kind, has at certain times been
of great temporary advantage ; for, by relieving the free
citizens to a great extent from the labour necessary for
existence, it has set them free to devote themselves either
to intellectual pursuits, to the cultivation of science and
of art, or to war. We have no direct testimony of the
extent to which slave-labour was employed in Italy at the
time of the second Punic war ; but we have certain indi-
cations to show that, if not everywhere in Italy, at least
among the Romans, and in all the larger towns, the
number of slaves was very considerable.'
' The noble Eomans were, even in the field, accompanied by slaves, who
served as grooms, or carriers of baggage (calones). — Livy, xxii. 58. Paullus
Diaconus, s. v. calones, p. 62. Servius ad Virg. ^n, vi. 1.
THE SECOND PUNIO WAE. 249
These remarks are suggested by the statements of the CHAP,
measures which the dictator M. Junius took after the > .^^L .
battle of Cannee for the defence of the country. In ^^^^
^ Period,
order to raise four new legions and one thousand horse, 216-215
he was compelled to enrol young men who had only just ^'^'
entered on the military age ; nay, he went even further, ^^JJ^^®^^®*
and took, probably as volunteers, boj^s below the age of dictator
seventeen who had not yet exchanged their purple-bor- p^.^^*^'
dered toga (the toga prsetexta) the sign of childhood, for
the white toga of manhood (the toga virilis). Thus the
legions were completed.^ For the present Eome had
reached the end of her resources. But the man-devouring
war claimed more victims, and the pride of the Romans
stooped to the arming of slaves.* Eight thousand of the
most vigorous slaves, who professed their readiness to
serve, were selected. They were bought by the state from
their owners, were armed and formed into a separate body
destined to serve by the side of the legions of Eoman
citizens and allies. As a reward for brave conduct in the
field, they received the promise of freedom.' With these
slaves, six thousand criminals and debtors were set free,
and enrolled for military service.^
The full significance of this measure can be appreciated Refnsal of
only if we bear in mind how the Boman government Roroansto
treated those unhappy citizens whom the fortune of war ransom the
had delivered into captivity. In the first Punic war it uk^Tar
had been the practice of the belligerents to exchange or Canna.
ransom the prisoners. It seemed a matter of course that
the same practice should be observed now, provided that
* Livy, xxii. 57.
* Livy, xxii. 67 : *Et aliam formam novi delectus inopialiberorum capitum ac
necespitas dedit.*
■ Livy, xxiv. 14. According to Appian, vii. 27, the slaveB were set free at
once.
* Livy, xxiii. 14 : * Ad ultimum prope desperatas rei public® auxilium, cum
honesta utilibus cedunt, descendit.' This mentioning of prisoners for debt is
strange, as, according to Livy (viii. 28), imprisonment for debt was abolished.
Probably this abolition referred only to Koman citizens ; and the debtors
referred to by Livy as liberated from prison and enrolled were perhaps Italian
allies.
250 ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK Hannibal was ready to waive the strict right of war which
— , ' ,^ gave him permission to employ the prisoners or to sell
them as slaves. From his point of view the last was
evidently the most profitable, for it was his object to
weaken Bome as much as possible, and Eome possessed
nothing more precious than her citizens. But, as we have
already noticed, he was led by higher considerations and
by a wise policy to seek a favourable peace with a nation
which, even after CannsB, he despaired of crushing.* He
selected, therefore, from among the prisoners ten of the
foremost men, and sent them to Kome, accompanied by an
officer named Carthalo, with instructions not only to treat
with the senate for the ransom of the prisoners, but to
open at the same time negotiations for peace. But in
Bome the genuine Boman spirit of stubborn defiance had
so completely displaced the former fears that no man
thought of even mentioning the possibility of peace ; and
Hannibal's messenger was warned not to approach the
city. Thereupon the question was discussed in the senate,
whether the prisoners of war should be ransomed. The
mere possibility of treating this as an open question causes
astonishment. The men whose liberty and lives were at
the mercy of Hannibal were not purchased mercenaries
nor strangers. They were ihe sons and brothers of those
who had sent them forth to battle ; they had obeyed the
call of their country and of their duty, they had staked
their lives in the field, had fought valiantly, and were
guUty of no crime except this, that with arms in their
hands they had allowed themselves to be overpowered by
the enemy, as Boman soldiers had often done before. But
in this war Bome wanted men who rated their lives as
nothing, and were determined rather to die than to flee or
surrender. In order to impress this necessity upon all
Boman soldiers, the unfortunate prisoners of CannaB were
sacrificed. The senate refused to ransom them, and aban-
* OompAre Hannibars speech to the prisoners (Liry, xxii. 68) : * RomanoB
jMtifl miti sermone alloqnitur ; non interneciTum sibi esse cum Romania bellom ;
da dignit&te atque imperio certare/ &c
THE SECOND PUNIC WAE. 251
doned them to the mercy of the conqueror.' At the CHAP,
very time when Bome armed slaves in her defence, she -_ . ' -
handed over thousands of freebom citizens to be sold in the Skcoxd
Pebiod,
slave-markets of Utica and Carthage, and to be kept to 216-215
field labour under the burning sun of Africa. We may ^^'
admire the grandeur of the Koman spirit, and from ^ some
points of view it is worthy of admiration ; but we are
bound to express our horror and detestation of the idol of
national greatness to which the !Bomans sacrificed their
own children in cold blood.
As if they could excuse or palliate the inhuman severity Roman
of the Eoman senate by painting in a still more odious g^^ng"
light the character of the Punic general, some among the Hannibal.
Boman annalists related that Hannibal, from spite, vexa-
tion, and inveterate hatred of the Boman people, now
began to vent his rage on his unfortunate prisoners, and
to torment them with the most exquisite cruelty- Many
of them, they said, he killed, and from the heaped up
> Polybius (ri. 58) and Iavj (zxii. 68) gire an interesting account of the
sending of the ten deputies of the prisoners to Rome. According to them they
had sworn to return to Hannibal if the negotiations failed ; but one of their
number, after leaving the camp, returned immediately, under the pretext of
having forgotten something, thinking thus to comply with his promise, and he
remained in Home when the other nine returned into captivity, after the refusal
of the senate to ransom the prisoners. But the Bomans would not allow this sub-
terfuge, and sent him back to Hannibal in chains. There was, however, another
version of this story, which can be traced (see Cicero, De Offie. iii. 32, § lid) to
C. Acilius, one of the oldest Boman annalists, a contemporary of the elder Cato.
According to this version, all the ten deputies played the trick imputed in the
first version to one only, and, what is of more importance, all of them remained
at Rome after the breaking off of the negotiations, in consequence of a decree
of the senate which sanctioned this perfidious sophistry. They were, indeed,
afterwards degraded by the censors, and lived covered with infamy, so that
some of them destroyed themselves, and others retired altogether from public
life, but they were not compelled to return into captivity, as they had sworn
to do. It can hardly be doubted that, of the two versions, this is the one
more entitled to credence ; for we cannot see how it would ever have obtained
circulation if it had not been founded on truth, whereas the other version
seems invented from patriotic motives. Livy gives some details which
corroborate it: he mentions the names of three messengers dispatched by
Hannibal on account of the delay caused by the conduct of the first ten. He
alse assumes its truth in a later account (xxiv. 18). So does Valerius Maximus
(ii. 9, 8), whilst the story of Gellius {N, A. vii. 18) is an attempt to combine
both^ersiong.
252 ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK corpses lie made dams for crossing rivers ; some, who broke
>- — r^ — ' down imder the weight of the baggage which they had to
cany on the marches, he caused to be maimed by having
their tendons cut ; the noblest of them he compelled to
fight with one another like gladiators, for the amusement
of his soldiers, selecting, with genuine Punic inhumanity,
the nearest relations — fathers, sons, and brothers — to shed
each other's blood.' But, as Diodorus relates, neither
blows, nor goads, nor fire could compel the noble Bomans
to violate the laws of nature, and impiously to imbrue
their hands with the blood of those who were nearest and
dearest to them. According to Pliny,* the only survivor
in these horrid combats was made to fight with an
elephant, and when he had killed the brute, he received
indeed his freedom, which was the price that Hannibal
had promised for his victory, but shortly afber he had left
the Carthaginian camp, he was overtaken by Numidian
horsemen and cut down. K such detestable cruelties were
really within the range of possibility, we should have to
accuse, not only those who inflicted them, but those also
who, by refusing to ransom the prisoners, exposed them to
such a fate. But the sOence of Polybius,* and stiU more
the silence of Livy, who would have found in the suflFerings
of the Eoman prisoners a most welcome opportunity for
rhetorical declamations on Punic barbarity, are sufficient
to prove that the alleged acts of cruelty are altogether
without foundation, and that they were invented for the
purpose of representing Hannibal in an odious light, and
of raising the character of the I£omans at the expense
of that of the Carthaginians.^
' Appian, vii. 38; viii. 63. Diodoras, excerpt. i>e Vtrtut. 668, p. 101,
Tauchnitz. ZoDaras, ix. 2. Valerius Maximu8» ix. 2, ext. 2 : ' Hannibal cuius
maiore ex parte virtns seevitia constabat in flumine Vei^ello corporibus
Romania ponte facto exercitum traduxit. Idem captives nostros oneribiis et
itinere fessos infima pf^ium part-e snccisa relinquebat. Quos rero in castra per*
duxerat, paria fere fratrum et propinquorum iungens ferro deceraere cogebat'
» Pliny, Hist. Nat. viii. 7.
' Polybius had twice occasion to speak of the alleged cruelties of Hannibal :
tL 68 and ix. 24.
* This contrast of the tifa4fiHa of the Romans, with the d^/i^s of the Car-
THE SECOND PUNIC WAR. 258
When, on the evening of the bloody day of Cann®, CHAP.
Hannibal rode over the battle-field, he is reported by >^
Appian to have burst into tears, and to have exclaimed, Second
like Pyrrhus, that he did not hope for another victory 216-215
like this. It is possible that credulous Bomans may ^•^"
have found in this childish story some consolation for the ^0"^^° o^
•^ ^ ^ ^ Hannibal
soreness of their national feelings. But an impartial after the
observer cannot but feel convinced that Hannibal's heart caniue**
must have swelled with pride and hope when he surveyed
the whole extent of his unparalleled victory, and that he
considered it cheaply purchased by the loss of only 6,000
of his brave warriors. But he did not allow himself to
be carried away by the natural enthusiasm which caused
the impetuous Maharbal, the commander of his light
Numidian cavalry, to urge an immediate advance upon
Eome, and so to put an end to the war in one run. * If,'
said Maharbal, * you will let me lead the horse forthwith,
and follow quickly, you shall dine on the Capitol in five
days.' We may be sure that Hannibal, without waiting
for Maharbal's advice, had maturely considered the ques-
tion whether the hostile capital, the final goal of his
expedition, were within his reach at this moment. He
decided that it was not, and we« can scarcely presume to
accuse the first general of antiquity of an error of judg-
ment, and to maintain that he missed the favourable
moment for crowning all his preceding victories. All
thaginians is especially insisted upon by Diodorua {Joe. cit.). It was even
reported that Hannibal had trained his soldiers to feed on human flesh.
Polybius (ix. 24) explains how this idle story arose. One of HannibaVs sub-
ordinate generals, called Hannibal Monomachos, is said to have advised his
chief to accustom the soldiers to human flesh, so that they might, in case of
necessity, have this food to fall back upon, when all other supplies failed. But
Hannibal, it is said, rejected the odious idea. Upon such evidence as this
Hannibal was accused of cruelty ! Arnold (Hist, of Bome^ iii. 154), though
he says in a note that 'the remarks of Polybius should make us slow to
believe stories of Hannibal's cruelties, which so soon became a theme for the
invention of poets and rhetoricians,' nevertheless repeats in his text the
chaises brought against him. He says, * When Hannibal found that his
officer had not been allowed to enter the city, and that the Romans had
refused to ransom their prisoners, his disappointment betrayed him into acts
of the most inhuman cruelty.' If Ai'nold's note was an afterthought, it is a
pity that ho left his text unaltered.
254
ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK
IV.
Reasons
for Hanoi-
bars hesi-
tation to
march
upon
IU>ine.
Policy of
Hannibal.
that we can do is to endeavour to discover the motives
which may have kept him from an immediate advance
upon Borne.
After the battle of Cannse, Hannibal's army numbered
still about 44,000 men. It was surely possible with such
a force as this to penetrate straight through the mountains
of Samnium, and through Campania into Latium, without
encountering any formidable resistance. But this march
could not be accomplished in less than ten or eleven days,
even if the army were not delayed by any obstacles, and
marched ever so fast. The interval of time which must
thus elapse between the arrival of news from the battle-
field and the approach of the hostile army, would enable
the Homans to make preparations for defence, and ex-
cluded, accordingly, the possibility of a surprise- Bome
was not an open city, but strongly fortified by its situation
and by art. Every Boman citizen up to the age of sixty
was able to defend the walls, and thus, even if no reserve
was at hand (which Hannibal could not take for granted),
Bome was not helplessly at the mercy of an advancing
army.
Failing to take Bome by a surprise, Hannibal would
have been compelled to* besiege it in form. This was
an undertaking for which his strength was insufficient.
His army was not even numerous enough to blockade the
city and to cut off supplies and reinforcements from
without. What could, therefore, be the result of a mere
demonstration against Bome, even if it was practicable
and involved no risk ? * It was of far greater importance
to gather the certain fruits of victory — ^to obtain, by the
conquest of some fortified towns, a new basis of operations
in the south of Italy, such as he had not had since his
advance from Cisalpine Gaul. Now, at last, the moment
had come when Hannibal might expect to be joined by
* Vincke {JDer eweite punische Krieg, p. 851) considers the omission of a
march upon Borne an unpardonable error. He thinks that Hannibal ought to
hare marched so rapidly as to precede the news of the Koman defeat at
Gannse ; and insists that, even if the enterprise had failed, it would not have
entailed dangers or losses.
THE SECOND PUNIC WAB. 255
the Boman allies. The battle of Cannse had shaken their CHAP.
VIII
confidence in the power of Rome to protect them if faith- * ^-^
fill, or to punish their revolt; and thus were severed ^^^
the strongest bonds which had hitherto secured their 216-216
obedience. If Hannibal now succeeded in gaining them '
over to his side, his deep-laid plan would be brilliantly
realised, and Borne would be more completely and securely
overpowered than if he had stormed the Capitol.
Keeping this end steadily in view, Hannibal again Overtures
acted precisely as he had done after his previous victories, bal to°the
He set the captured allies of the Bomans fi-ee without Roman
ransom, and dismissed them to their respective homes,
with the assurance that he had come to Italy to wage
war, not with them, but with the Bomans, the common
enemies of Carthage and Italy. He promised them, if
they would join him, his assistance for the recovery of
their independence and their lost possessions, threatening
them at the same time with severe punishment if they
should still continue to show themselves hostile.
It causes just astonishment, and it is a convincing proof Fidelity of
of the political wisdom and the fitness of the Boman to Rome,
people to rule the world, that even now the great majority
of their Italian subjects remained faithful in their alle-
giance. Not only the citizens of the thirty-five tribes,
of whom many had received the Boman franchise not as
a boon, but as a punishment — not only all the colonies,
Boman as well as Latin — but also the whole of Etruria,
XJmbria, Picenum, the genuine SabeUian races of the
Sabines, Marsians, Pelignians, Yestinians, Frentanians,
and Marrucinians, the Pentrian Samnites, and the Cam-
panians, as well as all the Greek cities,^ remained faithful
to Bome. Only in Apulia, in southern Samnium, where
the Caudinians and Hirpinians lived, in Lucania and
Bnittium, and especially in the city of Capua, more or less
readiness was shown to revolt from Bome ; but even in
those places, where the greatest hostility against Bome
< »
' The latter, no doubt, partly out of fear of the Bruttians. — Livy. xxir. 1.
256 ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK prevailed, there was not a trace of attachment to Car-
- _ / _' thage, and everywhere there was found a zealous Boman
party which opposed the Carthaginian alliance. This
was, as we have hinted above, partly the consequence of
the national antipathy of Italians and Punians, between
natives and foreigners; partly it was the alliance of
Hannibal with the Gauls, which made the Italians averse
to join the invader ; partly that dread of Roman revenge,
of which, even after Cannse, they could not rid themselves.
But it was mainly the political unity under the supremacy
of Rome, which, in spite of isolated defections, bound the
various races of Italy into indissoluble union, and in the
end prevailed even over the genius of Hannibal.
B^Tti^ ^^ When the Apulian towns of Arpi,' Salapia,^ and Her-
and donea,' and the insignificant and all but unknown Uzentum
Hinpania. j^ ^j^^ extreme south of Calabria, had embraced the Car-
thaginian cause, Hannibal marched along the Aufidus
into Samnium, where the town of Compsa opened her
gates to him. A portion of his army he sent under Hanno
to Lucania for the purpose of organising a general in-
surrection among the restless population of that district ;
another portion, under the command of his brother Mago,
he dispatched to Bruttium with the same commission,*
whilst he himself marched with the bulk of his army into
Campania. The Lucanians* and Bruttians were ready to
rise against Rome. Doubtless they chafed impatiently
under a government which obliged them to keep the
peace ; they regretted their former licence of ravaging
and plundering the land of their Greek neighbours, and
they hoped, with Hannibal's sanction, to be able to resume
> Polybius, iii. 118, § 2.
' Liry, xxiv. 47. Appian, Tii. 45.
■ Liry, xxvii. 1. Both Polybius and Livy are inaccurate in their state-
ments which refer to the revolt of the allies. They omit to mention at the
proper place the defection of some, as of Salapia and Herdonea, referring but
casually to it on some other occasion ; and again they enumemte others as
having joined Hannibal after the battle of Cannse, who remained in their
allegiance for some time longer, as, for instance, Tarentum.
* Livy, xxiii. 11.
» But with some exceptions. See Livy, xxiv. 20; xxv. 16.
THE SECOND PUNIC WAR. 257
on a large scale those practices of brigandage to which CHAP,
they had been so long addicted.^ Only two insignificant
towns, Consentia and Petelia, remained faithful to Eome, Second
and were taken by force, after an obstinate resistance. 216-216
Prom a port on the Bmttian coast Mago no\t sailed to
Carthage, and conveyed to the government Hannibal's p^*"g**
report of his last and most glorious victory, as also his character
views and wishes with regard to the manner of conducting ^ ^ ^ ^"'
the war for the future. After the battle of Cannee the
character of the war in Italy was changed. Up to that
time the Eomans had defended themselves so vigorously
that they might almost be said to have acted on the
oflfensive. They had striven to beat Hannibal in the field,
opposing to him first an equal, then a double force. They
resolved now to confine themselves entirely to the defensive,
and indeed from this time to the end of the war they never
ventured on a decisive battle with Hannibal. The Car-
thaginians had military possession of a large portion of
southern Italy. Hannibal had no difficulty in maintaining
this possession, and needed for this purpose no great
reinforcements from home, especially since he reckoned on
the services of the Italians. But he was not able to aim
a decisive blow at Bome. To do this he needed assistance
on a large scale — nothing less, in fact, than another
Carthaginian army, which, considering the naval superiority
of the Eomans, could reach Italy only by land. A consider-
able portion of this army moreover must necessarily consist
of Spaniards, for Africa alone could not supply sufficient
materials. Spain, therefore, was, under present circum-
stances, of the greatest importance to Carthage. In that
country Hasdrubal, the brother of Hannibal, carried on the
war against the two Scipios. If in the year 216 he could
beat the Bomans, penetrate over the Pyrenees and the
Bhone, and then in the following spring cross the Alps, the
two brothers could march upon Bome from north and
south, and end the war by the conquest of the capital.
To carry out this plan, which Mago as Hannibal's con- Reeolution.
' Livy, xxiy. 2.
VOL. n. S
258 ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK fidential envoy laid before the Carthaginian government,
_ V ' it was resolved to send 4,000 Numidian horse and forty
of the Car- elephants to Italy, and to raise in Spain 20,000 foot and
thjiginians 4^000 horse. We hear much* of the opposition which
Hannibal, these measures encountered in the Carthaginian senate.
Hanno, the leader of the party hostile to the house of
Barcas, it is said, resisted Hannibal's propositions and the
prosecution of the war. But as the Barcide party had an
overwhelming majority, the opposition was powerless and
unable to thwart Hannibal's plans. We can therefore
easily believe that the Carthaginian senate voted all but
unanimously the supplies of men and materials of war
which Hannibal required.
The war As matters stood now, everything depended on the issue
in Spam, ^f ^j^^ ^g^ jj^ Spain. While the rapid course of events in
Italy was followed by a comparative rest, while the war was
there resolving itself into a number of smaller conflicts, and
turned chiefly on the taking and maintaining of fortified
places, the Bomans succeeded in dealing a decisive blow in
Spain, which delayed the Carthaginian plan of reinforcing
Hannibal from that quarter to a time when the Romans
had completely recovered from the effects of their first
three defeats on the Trebia, the Thrasymenus, and the
Aufidus.
Further But this event, which was in reality the turning-point
revolts jj^ ^Y^Q career of Carthaginian triumphs, did not take place
3?oii.an till later in the course of the year 216 B.o. Meanwhile the
* '®** prospects of Eome in Italy had become still more clouded.
The battle of Cannae began to produce its effects. One
after another of the allies in southern Italy joined the
enemy, and Eome in her trouble and distress was obliged
to leave to their fate those who, remaining faithful, only
asked for protection and help to enable them to hold their
ground.
Condition The richest and most powerful city in Italy next to
ofCupua. ;^mQ ^a^ Capua. She was able to send into the field
30,000 foot and an excellent cavalry of 4,000 men, unsui^
> Livj, xxiii. 13.
THE SECOND KJNIC WAR. 259
passed by any Italian state. No city not included in the CHAP.
Boman tribes appeared so intimately connected with
Eome as Capua. The Eomans and the Capnans had |«»n^
become one people more completely than the Eomans and 2 16-21 5
the Latins. The Capuan knights possessed the fuU Roman ^'^'
franchise, and the rest of the people of Capua enjoyed the
civil rights of Romans exclusive only of the political rights.
The Capuans fought in the Roman legions side by side
with the inhabitants of the thiriiy-five tribes. A great
number of Romans had settled in Capua, and the pro-
minent families of this town were connected by marriage
with the highest nobility of Rome. These Capuan nobles
had a double motive for remaining faithful to Rome. .
Through the decision of the Roman senate they had in the
great Latin war (338 B.C.') obtained political power in
Capua and the enjoyment of an annual revenue which the
people of Capua were made to pay to them. A Roman
prefect resided in Capua to decide civil disputes in which
Roman citizens were concerned ; but in every other respect
the Capuans were free from interference with their local
self-government. They had their own senate and their
national chief magistrate, called Meddix. Under the
dominion of Rome the town had probably lost little of her
former importance and prosperity, and she was considered
now, as she had been a century before, a worthy rival of
Rome.
But it was precisely this greatness and prosperity which T>isposi-
fostered in the people of Capua the feeling of jealousy and ^\Qbeian8*
impatience of Roman superiority. A position which of Capua
smaller towns might accept without feeling humbled could Hanuibal.
not fail to offend the pride of a people which looked upon
itself as not inferior even to the people of Rome. The
plebeians of Capua, in other words the vast majority of the
population, had been grievously wronged and exasperated
by the measure of the Roman senate which had deprived
Capua of her domain or public land, and had in consequence
imposed a tax for the support of the Capuan nobility. The
* See Tol. i. p. 373.
s 2
260 ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK natural opposition between the two classes of citizens,
s^ — ^ . which we find in every Italian community, had through this
measure been embittered by a peculiar feeling of injustice
on the popular side, and by the slavish attachment of the
nobles to their foreign friends and supporters. It was not
Hannibal's appearance in Italy that first produced this
division in Capua. But the discontent which had been
growing for years, had hitherto been kept down by the
irresistible power of Rome. Now, as it seemed, the hour
of deliverance was at hand. Soon after the battle of the
lake Thrasy menus iu the preceding year, when Hannibal
for the first time appeared in Campania, he had tried to
detach Capua from the Roman alliance. Some Capuan
prisoners of war whom he had set free, had promised to
bring about an insurrection in their native city ; but the
plan had failed.* Another decisive victory over the Romans
was wanted to inspire the national and popular party in
Capua with sufficient courage for so bold a step as the
throwing off of their allegiance. Such a victory had been
gained at Cannse ; and the revolution in Capua was one of
its first and most valuable fruits.*
Revolt of The Capuan nobility was neither strong enough to sup-
At^u*' press the popular movement in favour of Hannibal, nor
and * honest and firm enough to retire from the government and
to leave the town after the Carthaginian party had gained
the ascendency. Only a few men remained faithful to
Rome, foremost among whom was Decius Magius. The
majority of the senate of Capua allowed themselves to be
intimidated by Pacuvius Calavius,' one of their number,
and hoped by joining the Carthaginians to save their pre-
rogatives and their position. Soon after the battle of
Cannse they despatched an embassy to Hannibal and con-
cluded a treaty of friendship and alliance with Carthage,
which guaranteed their entire independence, and especially
an immunity from the obligation of military service and
other burthens.^ As the prize of their joint victory over
» See above, p. 220. • Livy, audii. 2-10. Zonaras, ix. 2.
■ Livy, zxiii. 2.
* Liyy, zxiii. 7 : ' Legati ad Hannibalem yenerant pacemque cum eo con
Galatia.
THE SECOND PUNIC WAE.
261
Borne they hoped that the dominion over Italy would fall
to their share. In order to cut off every chance of a
reconciliation with Eome, and to convince their new ally
of their unconditional attachment, the Capuan populace
seized the Boman citizens who happened to be residing
among them^ shut them up in one of the public baths, and
killed them with hot vapour. Three hundred Boman pri-
soners were delivered into the keeping of the Capuan s by
Hannibal as a security for the safety of an equal number
of Capuan horsemen who were serving with the Boman
army in Sicily. The example of Capua was followed
voluntarily or on compulsion by Atella and Calatia, two
neighbouring Italian cities. All the other numerous towns
of Campania, especially the Greek community of Neapolis
and the old city of Cumae (once, like Neapolis, a Greek
settlement, but now entirely Italian), remained faithfiilto
Bome. This was due to the influence of the nobility,
while the popular party evinced everywhere a strong desire
to join the Carthaginian cause.
Among the great events which convulsed Italy at this
time our attention is arrested by the fate of a comparatively
humble individual, because it permits us to catch a glimpse
of the civil struggles and vicissitudes which the great
war called forth in every Italian city, and because it throws
an interesting and a favourable light on the character of
Hannibal.* Decius Magius was the leader of the minority
in the Capuan senate, which, remaining faithful to Borne,
rejected all the offers of Hannibal, and even after the occu-
pation of their town by a Punic garrison entertained the
hope of recalling their countrymen to their allegiance, of
overpowering and murdering the foreign troops, and re-
storing Capua to the Bomans. He made no secret of his
sentiments and his plans. When Hannibal sent for him
into his camp, he refused to go, because, as a free citizen of
CHAP.
VIII.
Skci^nd
Pkruu),
2I6-2I0
B.C.
The
resistance
of Decius
Magius to
Hannibal.
dicionibus his fecerunt, ne quia imperator magistratiuiTe Fcenonim ius tilhim
in civem CampAnum haberet, neve civis Campanus in^itus militaret munusre
£iceret; ut sn^e leges, sui magibtratus Capus essent.'
* Livy, xxiii. 8-10.
262
ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK
IV.
Story of
PaciiTius
CalaTiuB.
Capua, he was not boond to obey the behests of a stranger.
Hannibal might have employed force ; but his object was
to gain oyer as a friend, not to punish, so influential a man
as Decius. When he made his public entry into Capua, the
whole population poured out to meet him, eager to see face
to face the man who had taken the Roman yoke from their
shoulders. But Decius Magius kept aloof from the gaping
crowd* He walked up and down on the market-place with
his son and a few clients as if he had no concern in the
general excitement. On the following day, when he was
brought before Hannibal, he exhibited the same spirit of
defiance^ and tried even to rouse the people against the in-
vaders. What would have been the fate of such a man, if
he had thus defied a Eoman general? Hannibal was
satisfied with removing him from the place where his pre-
sence was likely to cause difficcdties. He ordered him to be
sent to Carthage to be kept there as a prisoner of war. But
Decius Magius was spared the humiliation of living at the
mercy of his hated enemies. The ship that was to take him
to Carthage was driven by adverse winds to Cyrene. Hence
he was brought to Egypt; and KingPtolemy Philopator, who
was on friendly terms with Some, allowed him to return to
Italy. But where was he to go ? His native town was in
the hands of a hostile faction and of the national enemies,
while Bome was carrying on a war of extermination against
her. He remained an exile in a foreign land, and thus was
spared the misery of witnessing the barbarous punishment
which a few years later the ruthless hand of Bome inflicted
on Capua. No man would have been more justified in
deprecating this punishment, and more likely to mitigate
it, if Boman justice could ever be tempered with mercy,
than the man who had dared in the cause of Bome to defy
the victorious Hannibal.^
The two hostile parties which opposed each other in the
Campanian towns had caused even members of the same
families to be divided against each other.' Pacuvius CaJa-
> Livy, zxiii. 10.
' livj, zziii. 8.
THE SECOND PUNIC WAE.
263
CHAP.
vni.
Srcokd
Pbbioo,
216-216
B.C.
vius, the chief instigator of the revolt of Capua, had mar-
ried a daughter of a noble Roman, Appius Claudius, and
his son was a zealous adherent of the Roman cause. The
father tried in vain to convince the youth that the star of
Some had set, and that his na.tive town of Capua could re-
gain her ancient position and splendour only by a league
with Carthage. Not even the countenance and the kind
words of Hannibal himself, who at the father's request
pardoned the errors of the son, could conciliate the
sturdy young man. Invited with his father to dine in
company with Hannibal, he remained sullen through the
merriment of the banquet, and refused even to pledge
Hannibal in a cup of wine, under the pretext of not feel-
ing well. Towards evening, when Pacuvius left the dining
room for a time, his son followed him, and drawing him
aside into a garden at the back of the house, declared his
intention of presently killing Hannibal and thus obtaining
for his countrymen pardon for their great oflFence. In the
utmost dismay, Pacuvius besought his son to give up this
heinous scheme, and vowed to shield with his own body the
man to whom he had sworn to be faithful, who had in-
trusted himself to the hospitality of Capua, and whose
guests they were at this moment. In the struggle of con-
flicting duties filial piety prevailed. The youth cast away
the dagger with which he had armed himself, and returned
to the banquet to avert suspicion.
In Nola as in Capua the people were divided between Occupation
a Roman and a Carthaginian party.' The plebs was in the^°rotor
favour of joining Hannibal, and it was with difiiculty that Maicellus.
the nobles delayed the decision, and thus gained time to
inform the prsator Marcellus, who was then stationed at
Casilinum, of the danger of a revolt. Marcellus immedi-
ately hastened to Nola, occupied the town with a strong
garrison, and repulsed the Carthaginians, who, counting
on the friendly disposition of the people of Nola, had
come to take possession of the town. This lucky hit of
> loYj, zxiii. 14.
264 ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK Marcellus was magrnified by the Roman annalists into a
>- — r^ — ' complete victory over Hannibal. Livy * found in some of
the writers whom he consulted the statement that
2,800 Carthaginians were slain; but he is sensible and
honest enough to suspect that this is a great exaggeration.
The extent of the success of Marcellus was no doubt this,
that Hannibal's attempt to occupy Nola with the assistance
of the Carthaginian party failed; and considering the
importance of the place, this was indeed a great point
gained. But it was an empty boast if Roman writers
asserted in consequence that Marcellus had taught the
Romans to conquer Hannibal.^ Livy hits the truth by
saying that not to be conquered by Hannibal was more
difficult at that time than it was afterwards to conquer
him. It was the merit of Marcellus that he saved Nola
from being taken. This was effected not only by antici-
pating the arrival of the Carthaginians, and by securing
the town with a garrison, but by severely punishinj^ the
leaders of the popular party in Nola, who were guilty or
suspected of an understanding with Hannibal. When
seventy of them had been put to death, the fidelity of Nola
seemed sufficiently secured.'
Occupation The pretended victory of Marcellus at Nola appears the
and ^^^'"* more doubtful as Hannibal about the same time was able
Acerrflpby to take in the immediate neighbourhood the towns of
Nuceria and Acerrse,* and made several attempts to gain
' Livy, xxiii. 16.
* Compare Cicero, Brut. iii. 12 : * Post Cannensem illam calamitatfim primnm
Marcelli ad Nolam proelio populus se Eomanus erezit/ Valerius Maximus,
i. 6, 9.
* Livy, xxiii. 17.
* On this occasion the stories of Hannibal's treachery and cruelty are
repeated. According to Zonaras (ix 2: compare Dion Cassius, ff. 50, 54;
Appian, viii. 63), Hannibal caused the senators of Nuceria to be kiUed ; and
though he promised the other inhabitants to let them leave the town in safety,
he caused them to be cut dovn on the road by his horsemen. This story is
indirectly contradicted by Livy (xxiii. 16), who relates that the people of
ISuceria rejected the offer of Hannibal, who wished them to take sen'ice with
him, and took refuge all over Campania, but especially in Nola and
Neapolis; that thirty senators of Nuceria, on being refused admittance into
Capua, went to Cums. Livy either could not have found anything of the
THE SECOND PTJNIC WAE. 265
possession of Neapolis. Neapolis would have been a most CHAP,
valuable acquisition, as a secure landing-place and a sta- , yiu.
tion for the Carthaginian fleet. But the Neapolitans were Sboond
on their guard. All attempts to take the town by sur- 216-216
prise failed, and Hannibal had not the means of laying ^'^'
siege to it in a regular manner. His attempts to take
Cumse were equally futile, and even the petty town of
Casilinum, in the immediate vicinity of Capua, on the river
Volturnus, offered a stout resistance. But Casilinum was
too important on account of its position to be left in the
hands of the Romans. Hannibal therefore resolved to
lay regular siege to it.
The siege of Casilinum claims our special attention, as Sie^e of
it shows the spirit and the quality of the troops of whom the ^***""^^™*
Bomans disposed in their struggle with Carthage. When
the Roman legions in the spring of the year 216 b.o.
assembled in Apulia, the allied town of Prseneste was some-
what in arrear in preparing its contingent. This con-
tingent, consisting of five hundred and seventy men, was
therefore still on its march, and had just reached Campania,
when the news of the disaster of Cannse arrived. Instead of
marching further south, the troops took up their position
in the little town of Casilinum, and were there joined by
some Latins and Bomans, as well as by a cohort of four
hundred and sixty men from the Etruscan town of Perusia,
which, like the Prsenestine cohort, had been delayed in
taking the field. Shortly after this Capua revolted, and
everywhere in Campania the popular party showed a dis-
position to follow the example of Capua. To prevent the
people of Casilinum from betraying their Roman garrison
to the Carthaginians, the soldiers anticipated treason by
a treacherous and barbarous act. They fell upon the
inhabitants, put to death all fchat were suspected,' destroyed
alleged atrocities of Hannibal in the annals he consnlted, or he discredited the
Btatementi). Mommsen {Som. Hiat. i. p. 623 ; £ng. translation, ii. 142) accepts
them as true.
1 From lAyy zxiii. 17 it wonld appear that all the inhabitants were killed,
but this is contradicted by Liry himself in another place (xxiii. 19). This
heinous act of the Roman garrison closely resembles the doings of the garrison
266 EOMAN HISTORY.
BOOK that portion of the town which lay on the left bank of the
'_ / - river, and pnt the other half in a state of defence. The
Carthaginians summoned the town in vain, and then tried
to take it by storm ; but several assaults were repulsed by
the garrison with the greatest courage, and with perfect
success. Hannibal with his victorious army was unable to
take by force this insignificant place, with its garrison of
scarcely one thousand men — so utterly was he destitute
of the means and apparatus necessary for a regular siege ;
and perhaps he shrunk from sacrificing his valuable troops
in this kind of warfare. Yet he did not give up Casilinum.
He kept up a blockade, and in the course of the winter
hunger soon began its ravages among the defenders. A
Soman force under Gracchus, the master of the horse of
the dictator Junius Pera, was stationed at a short distance,
but made no attempt to throw supplies into the town, or
to raise the siege. Gradually all the horrors of a pro-
tracted siege broke out in the town ; the leather of the
shields was cooked for food, mice and roots were devoured,
many of the garrison threw themselves from the walls or
exposed themselves to the missiles of the enemies to end
the pangs of hunger by a voluntary death. The Roman
troops under Gracchus tried in vain to relieve the distress
of the besieged by floating down the river during the night
casks partly filled with grain. The Carthaginians soon dis-
covered the trick, and fished the casks out of the river
before they reached the town. When all hope of relief
was thus gone, and half of the defenders of Casilinum had
perished by hunger, the heroic Prsenestines and Perusians
at last consented to surrender the town on condition of
being allowed to ransom themselves for a stipulated sum.^
of Bona in Sicily, and those of the Campanian legion in Bhegium. — See
Tol. i. p. 518.
' Again some annalifits accused Hannibal of an act of cruel perfidy. They
said (Liry, zxiii. 19) that horsemen were sent after the men and killed them.
Liyy had no difficulty in rejecting this impudent lie. which is exposed by the
subsequent narrative of the honours publicly awarded to the Prssnestine
soldiers after their return. He says : ' Donee omne aurum persolutum est, in
viflculifl habit! ; turn remiss! aumnia cum fide'
THE SECOND PUNIC WAK, 267
They were justly proud of their performance. Marcus CHAP.
Anicius, the commander of the PrsBnestine cohort, who, as
Livy remarks, had formerly been a public clerk, caused a p^^^^
statue of himself to be erected on the market-place of 216-215
Prseneste, with an inscription to commemorate the defence
of Casilinum. The Boman senate granted the survivors
double pay and exemption from military service for five
years. It is added that the Boman franchise was also
offered to them, but declined. Probably the men of Perusia
were honoured like the Praenestines, but we have no
information on the subject.
The obstinate defence of Casilinum is instructive, as Prospects
showing the spirit by which the allies of Bome were ani- ^^ ^^^ ^*'*
mated. K after the battle of Cannse the citizens of two towns
which did not even possess the Boman franchise fought
for Bome with such firmness and heroism, the republic could
look with perfect composure and confidencse upon all the
vicissitudes of the war ; nor could Hannibal with a handful
of foreign mercenaries have much hope of subduing a
country defended by several hundred thousand men as
brave and obstinate as the garrison of Casilinum.
The blockade of Casilinum had lasted the whole winter, Hannibal's
and the surrender of the town did not take place before aiiieg.'*
the following spring. Meanwhile Hannibal had sent a
portion of his army * to take up their winter-quarters in
Capua. The results of the battle of Cannse were in truth
considerable, but we can hardly think that they answered
his expectations. The acquisition of Capua was the only
advantage worth mentioning; and the value of this
acquisition was considerably reduced by the continued
resistance which he had to encounter in all the other
important towns of Campania, especially in those on the
sea coast. Thus Capua was in constant danger, and
instead of vigorously supporting the movements of Hannibal
it compelled him to take measures for its protection. It
could not be left without a Carthaginian garrison, for the
> Two detachments of his army were in Lucania and Brattiom ; a third waa
blockading Casilinum.
268
ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK
IV.
Defeat of
Hasdnibal
at Ibera
in Spain.
Boman party in the town would, as tlie example of Nola
showed, have seized the first opportunity for betraying it
into the hands of the Bomans. The conditions on which
Capua had joined the Carthaginian alliance, viz. exemption
from military service and war taxes, show clearly that
Hannibal could not dispose freely of the resources of his
Italian allies. He could rely only on their voluntary aid ;
and it was his policy to show that their alliance with
Carthage was more profitable for them than their sub-
jection to Borne. It was evident, therefore, that he could
not raise a very considerable army in Italy ; and that if he
could have found the men, he would have had the greatest
difficulty in providing for their food and pay, and for the
materials of war.
Still, whatever difficulties Hannibal might encounter
by continuing the war in Italy, he might, after the
stupendous success that had hitherto accompanied him,
expect to overcome, provided he obtained from home
the reinforcements on which he had all along calculated.
His first expectations were directed to Spain. In this
country the Bomans had with a just appreciation of its
importance made great efforts during the first two years
of the war to occupy the land between the Ebro and the
Pyrenees, and they had thus blocked up the nearest road
by which a Punic army could march from Spain to Italy.
The two Scipios had even advanced beyond the Ebro to
attack the Carthaginian dominions in the southern part
of the peninsula, and, following the example of Hannibal
in Italy, they had adopted the policy of endeavouring to
gain over to their side the subjects and allies of Carthage.
In the third year of the war Hasdrubal had to turn his
arms against the Tartessii,' a powerful tribe in the valley
' There is aome doubt whether the revolted tribe was that of the Tartessii
or the Carpesii. (See Drakenbirch's note to Livy, xxiii. 26.) Our ignorance of
the ancient geography of Spain, and still more the ignorance of it which the
ancient historians betray, and which makes their narratires so vagne, is the
chief canse of the obscurity in which the events in Spain are hidden, and has
given ample scope to the inrentions and exaggerations with which the
narrative of the war in Spain is disfigured.
THE SECOND PUNIC WAR. 269
of the Baetis, which had revolted, and was reduced only [CHAP,
after an obstinate resistance. Then, after he had received ^_ , '_^
reinforcements for the defence of the Carthaginian posses- Second
^ ^ Period,
sions in Spain, he advanced towards the Ebro to carry out 216-215
the plan which was so essential for Hannibal's success in ^'^'
Italy. In the neighbourhood of this river, near the town
of Ibera,* the two Scipios awaited his arrival. A great
battle was fought; the Carthaginians were completely
beaten ; their army was partly destroyed, partly dispersed.
This great victory of the Bomans ranks in importance with
that on the Metaurus and that of Zama. It foiled the
plan of the Carthaginians of sending a second army into
Italy from Spain,* and left Hannibal without the necessary
reinforcements at a time when he was in the full career
of victory, and seemed to need only the co-operation of
another army to compel Rome to yield and to sue for
peace. The Romans now had leisure to recover from
their great material and moral overthrow, and after
surviving such a crisis as this they became invincible.
While the Roman arms in Spain not only opposed a State of
barrier to the advance of the Carthaginians, but laid the saidiSa
foundation for a permanent acquisition of new territory, and Sicily,
the two provinces of Sicily and Sardinia, lately wrested
from Carthage, showed alarming symptoms of dissatis-
faction. The dominion of Rome in these two islands had
not been felt to be a blessing. Under its weight the
government of Carthage was looked upon by a considerable
portion of the natives as a period of lost happiness, the
evils of the present being naturally felt more keenly than
those of the past. The battle of Cannee produced its effect
even in these distant parts of the Roman empire, and
revived the hopes of those who still felt attachment to
their former rulers, or thought to avail themselves of their
aid to cast off their present bondage. Carthaginian fleets
' This town of Ibora, which Liyy (zxiii. 28) calls ' urbem opulentissimam
ea tempestate regionis eius/ is never mentioned again by any other writer, and
its locality is entirely unknown to us.
' Liyy, xziii. 29 : ' £a pugna Hasdrubali non modo in Italiam tradncendi
ezercitus sed ne manendi qiiidem satis tuto in Hisponia spem reliqueraC
IV.
270 ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK cruised off the coasts of Sicily and kept the island in a
. continued state of excitement. The Eoman officers who
commanded in Sicily sent home reports calculated to
cause disquiet and alarm. The proprsetor T. Otalicius
complained that his troops were left without sufficient
supplies and pay. From Sardinia the propr»tor A,
Cornelius Mammula sent equally urgent demands.^ The
home goverument had no resources at its disposal, and
the senate replied by bidding the two propreetors do the
best they could for their fleets and troops. In Sardinia
consequently the Roman commander raised a forced loan
— a measure ill calculated to improve the loyalty of the
subject^.* In Sicily it was again the faithful Hiero who
volunteered his aid, and this was the last time that he
exerted himself in the cause of his allies. Although his
own kingdom of Syracuse was at this very time exposed to
the devastations of the Carthaginian fleet, he nevertheless
provided the Roman troops in Sicily with pay and pro-
visions for six months. The old man would have been
happy if before his death he could have seen the war
ended, or at least warded off from the coasts of Sicily.
He foresaw the danger to which its continuance exposed
his country and his house, and he conjured the Romans to
attack the Carthaginians in Africa as soon as possible.
But the year after the battle of Cannse was not the time
for such an enterprise, and before it came to be carried
out a great calamity had overwhelmed Sicily, had over-
thrown the dynasty and exterminated the whole family of
Hiero, and had reduced Syracuse to a state of desolation
from which it never rose again*
' LiTy, xxiii. 21.
* Livy says (xxiii. 21): ' Cornelio in Sardinia civitates 80ci» benigne con-
tulerunt.' This expression is apt to mislead. What the effect of the measora
of Cornelius was, we learn from Livy, xxiii. 32, where the people of Sardinia
are spoken of as complaining that they had had to submit to harsh and
extortionate demands, and that they were oppressed by being made to pay
heavy contributions and to furnish supplies. The loans of the Sardinians
appear from this to hare been not unlike those which English kings used to
raise in the city of London, and which were euphemistically called ' bene-
volences.'
THE SECOND PUNIC WAR. 271
Altbong^li since the battle of the Trebia the seat of war CHAP.
VIII
had been shifbed from Cisalpine Gaul to central and
southern Italy, and although Borne itself was now more ^^^
directly exposed to the victorious arms of Hannibal, yet the 216-216
Bomans had neither given up Cremona and Placentia,
their fortresses on the Po, nor relaxed their efforts for
continuing the war with the Ghiuls in their own country.
They hoped thereby to draw off the Gkillic auxiliaries from
Hannibal's army,' and moreover to prevent any Punic
army which might succeed in crossing the Pyrenees and
Alps from advancing further into Italy. For this reason in
the spring of 216 two legions and a strong contingent of
auxiliaries, amounting altogether to 25,000 men, were sent
northward, under the command of the prsetor L. Postumius
Albinus, at the time when Terentius Yarro and iEhnilius
Paul! us set out on their ill-fated expedition to Apulia.
The disaster of Cannee naturally rendered the task of
Postumius very difficult by increasing the courage of the
tribes hostile to Rome, and by damping that of their
friends. Nevertheless the prsetor kept his ground in the
country about the Po during the whole of the year 216,
and so far gained the confidence of his fellow-citizens that
he was elected for the consulship of the ensuing year.
But before he could enter on his new office he was over-
taken by an overwhelming catastrophe,^ second only to the Defeat of
great disaster of Cannse. He fell into an ambush, and AibinS^n
was cut to pieces with his whole army. It is related* Cisalpine
that the Gauls cut off his head, set the skull in gold, and
used it on solemn occasions as a goblet, according to a
barbarous custom which continued long among the later
Gauls and Germans.
Borne was in a stat€ of frantic excitement. The worst Further
calamities of the disastrous year that had just passed away ^Ji^an*^
seemed about to be repeated at the very time when the «iiiio8 in
Bruttium.
» Polybiiw. iii. 106, § 6.
' This WHS early in the year 215 B.C., more than seren months after the
battle of Cannae. Polybias (iii. 118, § 0) is careless in stating that it
happened ' a few days after.*
' Livy, xziii. 24. Zonaras, ix. 3.
272 ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK brave garrison of Casilinum had been forced to capitulate,
, ^_1— ' and when by this conquest Hannibal had opened for him-
self the road to Latium. A short time before the faith-
ful towns of Petelia and Consentia in Bruttium had been
taken by storm. The others were in the greatest danger
of suflFering the same fate. Locri soon after joined the Car-
thaginians under favourable conditions : ^ and thus a mari-
time town of great importance was gained by the enemy.
In Croton the nobility tried in vain to keep the town for
the Romans, and to shut out the Bruttian allies of
Hannibal. The people admitted them within the walls,
and the aristocratic party had no choice but to yield to the
storm and to purchase for themselves permission to leave
the town by giving up possession of the citadel.^ Thus
the whole of Bruttium was lost to the Romans, with the
single exception of Rhegium. The legions were stationed
in Campania, and did not venture beyond their fortified
camps. Everywhere the sky was overhung with black
clouds. In Spain alone the victory of the Scipios at Ibera
opened a brighter prospect. By it the danger of another
invasion of Italy by Hannibal's brother was for the pre-
sent averted. Had the battle near the Ebro ended like
the battles hitherto fought on Italian soil, it would seem
that even the hearts of the bravest Romans must have
despaired of the republic.
Sojourn of Hannibal passed the winter of 216-215 B.C. in Capua.
Hannibal These winter-quarters became among the Roman writers
a favourite topic of declamation. Capua, they said, be-
came Hannibal's Cannse.' In the luxurious life of this
opulent city, to which Hannibal's victorious soldiers gave
themselves up for the* first time after long hardships and
privations, their military qualities perished, and from this
time victory deserted their standards. This statement, if
not altogether false, is at any rate a vast exaggeration.
* The date of the loss of Locri and Croton cannot be ascertained with
perfect accuracy. Livy reports it twice: xxiii. 30, and zziv. 1.
* Livy, xxiv. 2, 3.
* Florus, ii. 6 : ' Capnam Hannibali Cannas fuisse.' Liyy, xxiii. 18. Valerias
Maximus, ix. 1, ext. 1.
THE. SECOND PUNIC WAB.
278
As we have seen, only a portion of Hannibal's, army passed
the winter in Capua, whilst the rest was in Bruttium,
Lucania, and before Casilinum. But apart from this, it is
manifest that the people of Capua could not at that time
have been sunk in luxury and sensual pleasures. If their
wealth had been little affected by the calamities of the
war, surely the necessity of feeding some thousand soldiers
would soon have sobered them down and taught them
the need of economy. Hannibal knew how to husband
his resources, and he would not have allowed his men to
drain his most valuable allies. We c^ scarcely suppose
that voluntary extravagance and excessive hospitality
marked the conduct of a people which had, at the very
outset, stipulated for immunity from contributions. Lastly,
it is not true that the Punic army had in Capua the first
opportunity of recovering from the hardships of the war,
and of enjoying ease and comfort. The soldiers had had
pleasant quarters in Apulia after the battle on the lake
Thrasymenus,* and had already passed one winter comfort-
ably. But whatever may have been the pleasures and
indulgences of Hannibal's troops in Capua, their military
qualities cannot have suffered by them, as the subsequent
kistory of the war Sufficiently demonstrates.
That Hannibal's offensive tactics were relaxed after the
battle of Cannae is particularly evident from the events
of 215 B.C. The year passed without any serious en-
counters between the two belligerents. The Bomans had
resolved to avoid a battle, and applied their whole strength
to prevent the spread of revolt among their allies, and to
punish or re-conquer the towns that had revolted. The
war was confined almost entirely to Campania. In this
country Hannibal did not succeed, after the surrender of
Casilinum, in making any further conquests. An attempt
to surprise Cumse failed, and on this occasion the Capuans
suffered a serious reverse.* IN'eapolis remained steadfast
> Seealx)ve, p. 216.
• Livy's account (xxiii. 35), divested of the specific colouring which a patriotic
Boman would naturally give it, comes to this, that the Eoman consul^
VOL. 11. T
CHAP.
VIII.
Second
Pbbiod,
216-215
B.C.
Operations
in Cam-
pania,
215 B.C
274 EOMAN HISTORY.
BOOK and faithfal to Borne; Nola was guarded by a Boman
IV.
garrison, and the Boman partisans among the citizens ;
and a renewed attempt of Hannibal to take this town is
said to have been thwarted, like the first attack, the year
before, by a sally of the Bomans under Marcellus, and to
have resulted in a defeat of the Carthaginian army.' On
the other hand the Bomans took several towns in Cam-
pania* and Samnium,' punished their revolted subjects with
merciless severity, and so devastated the country of the
Hirpinians and Caudinians that they piteously implored
the help of Hannibal. But Hannibal had not sufficient
forces to protect the Italians who had joined his cause
and who now felt the fatal consequences of their step.
Hanno, one of Hannibal's subordinate officers, being
beaten at Grumentum in Lucania by Tiberius Sempronius
Longus, an officer of the prsetor M. Valerius LsBvinus,
who commanded in Apulia, was obliged to retreat into
Bruttium. A reinforcement of 12,000 foot, 1,500 horse,
20 elephants, and 1,000 talents of silver, which Mago
Sempronius Gracchus, in conjunction with the people of CiimsB, laid a trap for
the Cupuans. The various towns of Campania, it appears, celebmted a common
festival at Hanue (as the Latins celebrated theirs on the Mons Albanua).
During onA of these festivals, the Roman consul Sempronius Gracchus and the
Cumanians surprised and killed the unarmed and unresisting Capuaus. They
afterwards justified this act of treachery by saying that the Capuans hod
intended to surprise them, and were caught in their own snare. But, as
Arnold remarks (Hist, of Borne, iii. 184), this could only be a suspicion,
whilst the overt act of violence was their own.
* According to all appearance, this alleged victoiy is but another version of
that of the preceding year. In all essential parts the same circumstances are
related, only on a larger scale. Instead of 2,800 Carthaginians, 6,000 are slain
in the second fight, together with four elephants. Plutarch (MarcelL 11) relates
only one victory of Marcellus ; but we cannot appeal to his authority, as his
account seems to be the result of a confusion. Livy relates (xxiv. 17)
actually a third victory of Marcellus over Hannibal at Nola, in which 2,000
Carthaginians are killed. It is precisely the same story over again. The
plebeians at Nola send for Hannibal, the nobility for Marcellus ; the march of
Marcellus is identical with that related xxiii. 17. The panegyrists of the
house of Marcellus, it seems, had great faith in the credulity of the public ;
nor did they see any improbability in a story which makes the people of Nola
call in the aid of Hannibal a second time, shortly after a first attempt had
been punished by the execution of seventy of the conspirators.
^ Compulteria, Trebula, and Saticula. — Livy, xxiii. 39.
• Livy, xxiii. 37.
THE SECOND PUNIO WAR. 275
was to hare brought to his brother in Italy, had been CHAP,
directed to Spain after the victory of the Scipios at ._ . _-
Ibera ; and Hannibal had accordingly, in the year 215 b.o., Second
not only calculated in vain on being joined by his brother 216-215
Hasdrubal and the Spanish army, but he was also de- ^'°'
prived of the reinforcements which ought to have been
sent to him straight from Africa. As at the same time
the revolt of the Boman allies did not spread further, and
as the Bomans gradually recovered from the effects of the
defeat at Cannse, the fact that Hannibal was not able
to accomplish much is easily explained.
As in Italy, so in the other theatres of war, the Cartha- Defeat of
the Cap-
ginian arms were not very successful during this year, 216 thaginiann
B.C. In Spain, the victory of the Scipios at Ibera was fol- at illiturgi
lowed by a decided preponderance of Boman influence* intibili
The native tribes became more and more disinclined to ^° ^P*^"»
216 B.C.
submit to Carthaginian dominion, thinking that the
Bomans would help them to regain their independence.
It seems that the battle of Ibera was lost chiefly by
the defection of the Spanish troops. Hasdrubal had
thereupon tried to reduce some of the revolted tribes, but
was prevented by the Scipios, and driven back with
great loss. According to the reports which the Scipios
sent home, they had gained victories which almost counter-
balanced the disaster of CannsB. With only 16,000 men
they had totally routed at Illiturgi a Carthaginian army of
60,000 men, had killed more of the enemy than they them-
selves numbered combatants, had taken 3,000 prisoners,
nearly 1,000 horses, and seven elephants, had captured
fifby-nine standards, and stormed three hostile camps.
Soon after, when the Carthaginians were besieging In-
tibili, they were again defeated and suffered almost as
heavily.' Most of the Spanish tribes now joined Bome.
' Liry, xziii. 49. It is a great pitj that we have no more detailed report of
these two splendid yictories than the dry narrative which Livy gives in half a
chapter. But the meagreness of the report might he excused if its truth
were heyond suspicion. We shall find in the sequel that all the statements
that have reference to the affairs of Spain, and especially to the exploits of
the Scipios in that * country, are tainted with laudato y exaggeration on aa
T 2
276 . ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK These victories threw into the shade all the military
events which took place in Italy this year.
Success of Equal success attended the Boman arms in Sardinia.
^^ In the preceding year the propraetor Aulus Cornelius
Sardinia. Mammula had been left in that island without supplies
for his troops, and had exacted the necessary sums and
contributions by a species of forced loans from the natives.^
The discontent engendered by this measure, in connexion
with the news of the battle of Cannse, had the effect of
inflaming the national spirit of the Sardinians, who, from
the time of their subjection to Bome, had hardly allowed
a year to pass without an attempt to shake off the galling
yoke. The Carthaginians had contributed to fan this
flame,' and now dispatched a force to Sardinia to support
the insurgents. Unfortunately the fleet which had the
troops on board was overtaken by a storm arid compelled
to take refuge in the Balearic Islands, where the ships
had to be laid up for repair^' Meanwhile, the son of the
Sardinian chief Hampsicoras, impatient of delay, had
attacked the Romans in the absence of his father, and
had been defeated with great loss. When the Cartha-
ginians appeared in the island, the force of the insur-
rection was already spent. The praetor Titus Man-
lius Torquatus had arrived from Rome with a new
legion, which raised the Soman army in the island to
22,000 foot and 1,200 horse. He defeated the united
forces of the Carthaginians and revolted Sardinians in a
decisive battle, whereupon Hampsicoras put an end to his
life, and the insurrection in the island was eventually
suppressed.
Alliance of While thus the sky was clearing in the west, a new
nnusoally lai^e scale. Arnold {History of SoTMf iii. 260) says : ' The Roman
annalists, whom lAvj has copied here, seem to have outdone their nsnal
exaggerations in describing the exploits of the two Scipios, and what amount
of truth may be oonceoled beneath this mass of fiction we are wholly unable
to discover.* ' See above, p. 270.
' Livy, xziii. 41 : * Hanno, auctor rebellionis Sardis, bellique eius haud
dubie concibor.'
» Livy, xxiii. 84*
THE SECOND PUNIC WAR. 277
storm seemed to be ffatherine: in the east. Since the CHAP.
. . VIII
Komans had obtained a footing in lUyria, they had ceased ..-. ^_L^
to be uninterested spectators of the disputes which agitated p^^^^
the eastern peninsula,' and they had assumed the character 216-210
of patrons of Greek liberty and independence. By this
policy, and by their conquests in Illyria, they had become ^eefio^nia
the natural opponents of Macedonia, whose kings had withHan-
steadily aimed at the sovereignty over the whole of Greece.
The jealousy between Macedonia and Rome favoured the
ambitious plans of Demetrius of Pharos, the Ulyrian
adventurer whom the Romans had at first favoured and
then expelled, 219 b.c* Demetrius took refuge at the
court of King Philip of Macedonia, and did all in his power
to urge him to a war with Rome. Hannibal also had
hoped for the co-operation of the Macedonian king. But
the so-called Social War which Philip and the Achaian
league carried on since 220 B.C. against the piratical
-Sltolians occupied him so much that he had no leisure for
another enterprise. Then the news reached him of the
invasion of Italy by Hannibal. The gigantic struggle
between the two most powerful nations of their time
attracted specially the attention of the Greeks. In the
year 217 B.C. Philip was in the Peloponnesus. It hap-
pened to be the time of the Nemean games, with which,
as with the other great festivals of the Greek nation, not
even war was allowed to interfere. The king, surrounded
by his courtiers and favourites, was looking on at the games,
when a messenger arrived straight from Macedonia and
brought the first news of Hannibal's great victory at the
lake Thrasymenus. Demetrius of Pharos, the king's con-
fidential friend, was by his side. Philip immediately
imparted the news to him and asked his advice. Demetrius
eagerly seized the opportunity to urge the king to a war
with Rome, in which he hoped to regain his lost possessions
' This vas the real beginning of that revolution which Polybius (v. 1 05) places
in the year 217 B.C., and traces to the peace of Kuupactos. See p. 278,
note 1.
« See above, p. 138 ff.
278
ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK
IV.
Mistaken
policy of
PliUip.
in Ulyria. At Ids snggestion Philip resolved to end the
war in Greece as soon as possible, and to prepare for a
war with Borne. He hastened to conclude peace at
Nanpactos ' with the ^tolians, and forthwith began
hostilities bj land and sea against the allies and depen-
dents of Borne in Ulyria. But he displayed neither
promptness, energy, nor courage. He took a few insignifi-
cant places from fche Ulyrian prince Skerdilaidas, an ally
of the Bomans ; but when he had reached the Ionian Sea
with his fleet of one hundred small undecked galleys of
Ulyrian construction {lembi)y in the hope of being able to
take ApoUonia by surprise, he was so frightened by a false
report of the approach of a Boman fleet, that he made a
precipitate and ignominious retreat. Perhaps he was
already disheartened, and beginning to repent the step
which he had taken, when in 21 6 B.C. the news of the
battle of CannfB and of the revolt of Capua and other
Boman allies inspired him with new hope, and induced
him to conclude with Hannibal a formal alliance, by which
he promised his active co-operation in the war in Italy, on
condition that Hannibal, afber the overthrow of the Boman
power, should assist him to establish the Macedonian
supremacy in the eastern peninsula and islands.' Thus
the calculations and expectations with which Hannibal had
began the war seemed on the point of being realised, and
the fruits of his great victories to be gradually maturing.
The Bomans had watched the movements of Philip with
increasing anxiety. As long as he was implicated in the
Greek Social War, he was unable to do any mischief.
But when he brought this war to a hasty conclusion to
have his hands free against Ulyria and Bome, the senate
made an attempt to frighten him by demanding the ex-
tradition of Demetrius of Pharos.' When Philip refused
' PolybiuB {v, 105) dates from this peace the complication of the politics of
the eastern and western states of the Mediterranean, which had formerly been
independent of each other, but were henceforward determined by Rome. Tclt
roiro rh StafioiXiop ffwhrXt^t Tp&roVj k.t.X,
' Folybius, vii. 9. JAvj, xziii. 33. 2ionaras, iz. 4. * See above, p. 22d*
B.C.
THE SECOND PUNIC WAE. 279
this demand and followed up his refusal by an attack upon CHAP.
Ulyricum, Borne was de facto at war with Macedonia; but ^^ — ,— L^
the condition of the republic was such that the senate -^^^
was compelled to ignore the hostility of the Macedonian 216-216
king as long as he made no direct attack upon Italy. But
when, in the year 215 B.C., an embassy which Philip had
sent to Hannibal fell into their hands, they learnt with
terror that, in addition to the war which they had to carry
on in Italy, Spain, and Sardinia, they would have to
undertake another in the east of the Adriatic. They did
not, however, shrink from the new danger, and, in fact, they
had no choice. They strengthened their fleet at Tarentum
and the army which the prsetor M. Valerius Leevinus com-
manded in Apulia, and made all the necessary preparations
for anticipating an attack of Philip in Italy by an invasion
of his own dominions.' But it seems that Philip never
earnestly contemplated the idea of carrying the war into
Italy. He was bent only on profiting by the embarrass-
ment of the Komans to pursue his plans of aggrandisement
in Greece. It was, therefore, easy for the Romans to keep
him occupied at home by promising their support to all
who were threatened by Philip's ambitious projects; and
the military resources of Macedonia, which, if they had
been employed in Italy in conjunction with and under the
direction of Hannibal, might have turned the scale against
Bome, were wasted in Greece in a succession of unprofitable
petty encounters.
* On this occasion they sect to Valerius a sttm of money, which was
originally destined to repay Hiero of Syracuse for his loan of the preceding
year. At the same time Hiero again supplied 200,000 modii of wheat (Livy,
xxiii. 38). This proves sufficiently that Hiero did not die before 2\b B.C., as
has been supposed. — See Mommsen, Bom, Gesch, i. 615; English translation,
ii. 133.
280
ROMAN HISTORY.
Third Period of the Hanntbalian War.
BOOK
IV.
Death of
Hiero,
k\n^ of
SjracQBe.
THE WAR IN SICILY, 216-212 B.C.
Sicily, the principal theatre of the first war between
Borne and Carthage, had hitherto been almost exempt
from the ravages of the second. While Italy, Spain, and
Sardinia were visited and suffering by it, Sicily had only
been threatened now and then by the Carthaginian fleets,
but had never been seriously attacked. But now, in the
fourth year of the war, an event took place destined to
bring over the island all the worst calamities of an inter-
necine struggle, and to give the final blow to the declining
prosperity of the Greek cities. In the year 215 B.C. King
Hiero of Syracuse died, at the advanced age of mofe than
ninety years, and aflber a prosperous reign of fifty-four.
He was among the last of that class of men produced
by the Greek world with wonderful exuberance, who
were called ^ tyrants ' in more ancient times, and who
afterwards, when that name lost its original and inoffen-
sive signification, preferred to call themselves * kings.'
The best, and also the worst, of these rulers had sprung up
in Syracuse, a city which had tried in rapid succession all
forms of government, and had never long been able to
abide by any. Syracuse had seen the arbitrary, but in
their way honourable, tyrants G«lon and the elder Hiero ;
then the blood-stained first Dionysius, and his son, the
consummate ideal of a man of terror ; afterwards Agatho-
kles, great and brave as a soldier, but detestable as a man;
and, lastly, the wise and moderate Hiero 11., under whose
mild sceptre she once more revived, after a period of anar-
chy and depression, and enjoyed a long peace, security,
and well-being in the midst of the most devastating wars.
Polybius* bestows on Hiero ftill and well-deserved praise,
* Folybiua, xii. 8,
THE SECOND PUNIC WAE. 281
and his honourable testimony deserves to be recorded. CHAP.
VIII
* Hiero,' he says, * obtained the government of Syracuse by %- — ,^-L-
his own personal merit; fortune had given him neither j^^^
wealth, nor glory, nor anything else. And what is of all 216-212
things the most wonderful, he made himself the king of
Syracuse without kiUing, driving into exile, or harming a
single citizen, and he exercised his power in the same
manner in which he had acquired it. For fifty-four
years he preserved peace in his native city, and the govern-
ment for himself, without danger of conspiracy, escaping
that jealousy which generally fastens itself on greatness.
Often he proposed to lay down his power, but was pre-
vented by the universal wish of his fellow-citizens. He
became the benefactor of the Greeks, and strove to win
their approval. Thus he gained great glory for himself,
and won from all people great good-will for the men
of Syracuse. Though he lived surrounded by magnifi-
cence and luxury, he reached the great age of more than
ninety years, retaining possession of all his senses with
unimpaired health of body, which seems to me to be a
most convincing proof of a rational life.'
Such a ruler was the best constitution for Syracuse, Character
where republican freedom never failed to produce civil reign?"**
war, anarchy, and all imaginable horrors. Hiero re-
newed the laws which, about a century and a ha.lf before
his time, had been enacted in Syracuse by Diokles, and,
what was of far more importance, he took care that they
should be inforced. He seems to have bestowed his
especial care on the improvement of agriculture, industrial
pursuits, and commerce, and on healing the wounds which
the long wars had inflicted on*his country. Thus it is
explained how he was always able to supply money, com,
and other necessaries of war when his allies needed his
aid. But he was at the same time a patron of art, and
animated by the desire of gaining the approbation of the
whole Hellenic race — a desire which had been strong in
his predecessors Gelon and Hiero, and even in the blood-
stained tyrant Dionysius. He embellished the city of
282
ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK Syracuse with splendid and useful buildings, contested in
> ^ — . the great national games of the Greeks the prizes which
were the highest peaceful honours that a Greek could
aspire to ; he erected statues at Olympia,* and patronised
poets like Theokritos, and practical philosophers like
Archimedes. Of his Greek national spirit, and at the
same time of his humane sentiments and of his wealth, he
gave a striking proof when, in 227 B.C., the city of Rhodes
was visited by a terrible earthquake, which destroyed the
walls, dockyards, a great part of the town, and also the
far-famed colossus. It was not the universal custom in
antiquity, as it is at present in the civilised world, to
relieve extraordinary calamities like this by charitable
contributions from all parts. But Hiero's proper feelings
supplied the force of custom. He readily and liberally
succoured the distressed Ehodians, giving them more
than one hundred talents of silver and fifby catapults, and
exempting their ships from tolls and dues in the port of
Syracuse. For this liberality, which was entirely his
own doing, he gracefully and modestly disclaimed any
personal merit, by putting up in Rhodes a group of statues
representing the city of Syracuse in the act of crowning
her sister city.^
Relations How Hiero assisted Rome with never-failing zeal and
wiS^Rome ^^l^^l ^® have noticed on several occasions. It was by
this steadfast and honest policy that he succeeded in
keeping unscathed the independence of Syracuse during the
contest of his two powerful neighbours. When peace was
concluded after the first Punic war, this independence was
formally recognised, and Hiero had now good reason to
persevere in his attachment to Rome, which had proved
her superiority over Carthage, and was now mistress of the
greater part of SicUy, exercising that influence over him
which a patron has over his client. Nevertheless he did
not hesitate to render, in the Mercenary War, that essen-
tial service to Carthage which seemed to him called for.
and Car-
thage.
' FauBanias, Ti. 15, 3.
Polybiufl, V. 88.
THE SECOND PUNIC WAE. 288
He wished to preserve a balance of power, and the Bomans CHAP,
had no just eanse or pretext to interfere with him, >^ , ' __-
though, from their ungenerous policy with regard to Car- ^^
thage at this time, they must have been annoyed at any 216-212
support being given to their rivals. In the year 237 B.C. *'^"
Hiero paid a visit to Borne, was present at the public
games, and distributed 200,000 modii of com among the
people. Perhaps the journey was not undertaken merely
for pleasure. It was not customary at that time for
princes to travel for their amusement. Hiero went to
Bome soon after the disgraceful stroke of policy by which
the Bomans had acquired possession of Sardinia ; ' and it
is not at all unlikely that, even at that early period, four
years after the termination of the first Punic war, a
desire was manifested in Bome to annex the Syracusan
dominions to the Boman province of Sicily, and thus to
prevent the possibility of Carthage finding in some future
war friends or allies in Syracuse. If, indeed, such dangers
were then threatening his independence, Hiero succeeded
in removing them, and, by renewed proofs of sincere
attachment, was able to maintain himself in the favour of
his too powerful friends. The Gallic war (225 B.C.) gave
him again an opportunity for it ; * and soon after the break-
ing out of the second Punic war, he showed his unaltered
zeal and att8<;hment by sending auxiliaries and supplies,
in 217 and 216 B.C.' It seemed that, of all parts of the
Boman dominions, Sicily was most exposed to the attacks
of the Carthaginians, and the most serious danger arose
from the existence of a strong Carthaginian party within
the island. Sicily had been so long under Carthaginian
dominion or influence that here, as well as in Sardinia,
such a party could not fail to exist. It was of course
made up chiefly of the large number of men who had
sufiFered by the change of masters, and were hoping for
better things from a return of the Carthaginians. The
whole of Sicily, as the succeeding events prove, was in a
^ > See aboTe, p. 120. * See above, p. 132, n. 2. 'See aboye, pp. 200, 226.
284
ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK
IV.
Effects (rf
Roman
supremacy
in Sicily.
state of fermentation, and it required but a slight impulse
to rouse a great part of the population to take up arms
against Borne. This impulse was given in 215 B.C. by
the death of Hiero, which produced an eflfect so much the
more fatal as his son Gelon, who seems to have shared
his sentiments and policy, had died shortly before him,
leaving only a son, called Hieronymus, a boy of fifteen
years.i
Of the condition of Sicily since its acquisition * by Rome
in 241 B.C., we can form only an imperfect notion. We
may suppose that, upon the whole, the material prosperity
of the island was gradually increasing, after the ending of
the destructive internal wars ; but we should not wonder
if the compulsory peace which the different communities
of Sicily were now enjoying had been felt by many to be
a mark of their subjection. The towns which during the
war with Carthage had joined the Roman side — such as
Segesta, Panormus, Centuripa, Alsesa, Halicyse — occupied
a privileged position and were free from all taxes and ser-
vices. The Mamertines of Messana were regarded as
allies of Rome, and supplied their contingent of ships like
the Greek towns in Italy. All the other towns were
tributary, and paid the tenth part of the produce of their
land. This liability implied no oppression, for most of the
Sicilians had in former times paid the same tax to the
Carthaginians, or to the government of Syracuse. But
the Romans placed on the free intercourse between the
different communities restrictions which must have been
felt as highly injurious and annoying. No Sicilian was
allowed to acquire landed property beyond the limits of
his native community, and the right of intermarriage and
* According to Livy (xxiii. 30), the disposition of Gelon was hostile to
Home, and his sudden death caused the suspicion tliat Hiero was the cause of
it. But this statement is refuted by Polybius, from whose account-s (t. 88,
Tii. 8, § 9) it appears that Gelon, down to the very last years of his father's life,
was associated with him in the government, and conformed in all respects to
his father's wishes.
' It is of course understood that we speak only of the Boman portion of
Sicily, i.e, of Sicily apart from tlie kingdom of Syracuse.
THE. SECOND PUNIC WAE.
285.
ihlieritance was probably confined within the same narrow
bounds, Boman citizens and the people of the few favoured
towns being alone exempt from this restriction. Thus
every town in Sicily was, to a great extent, isolated, and
the limited competition placed the privileged few at a great
advantage both in the acquisition of land and in every kind
of trade and commerce. Under such circumstances the
freedom from military service was probably not felt to be
a great boon, especially as at that time the prospect of
booty and military pay was no doubt attractive to many of
the impoverished population. Since 227 b.o. Sicily was
placed under a prsetor, who conducted the whole civil and
military administration, including that of justice. This
was the beginning of those annual viceroyalties with un-
limited power which, in course of time, became the terrible
scourge of the Boman provinces, and almost neutralized
the advantages which, by the inforcement of internal peace,
Bome was able to bestow on the countries round the
Mediterranean. The Eoman nobles could not resist the
temptation of abusing, for their own profit, the public
authority which was intrusted to them for the govern-
ment of the provinces ; and as long as the Boman republic
lasted, it never succeeded, in spite of many attempts, in
putting down this great evil.
The consequences of the discontent in Sicily, and of the
revolution which followed the death of Hiero, did not
assume a threatening aspect till the following year. In
the meantime the attention of the Boman senate was
absorbed by other things nearer home. Since the censor-
ship of C. Flaminius and L. ^milius in the year 220, the
senate had not been formally reconstituted. The public
magistrates, from the quaestors upwards, enjoyed, it is true,
the right, after the termination of their office, of joining
in the deliberations of the senate, and of voting ; but their
number was not sufficient, even under ordinary circum-
stances, to keep the senate at its normal strength of three
hundred members, and the censors were therefore obliged,
every five years, on the revision of the. list of senators, to
CHAP.
vni.
— — . — ^
Third
Pkbiod,
216-212
B.C.
Re-consti-
tution of
the Roman
senate.
286 EOMAN mSTORY.
BOOK admit into the senate a number of men from the general
^ • - body of the citizens, who had not yet discharged any
public office. But now the circumstances were most extra-
ordinary. Many senators had fallen in battle; eighty
were said to have perished at Cannes alone. Many were
absent on the public service in various parts of Italy, in
Spain, Sardinia, and Sicily. The senate therefore was re-
duced in numbers as it never had been since the establish-
ment of the republic. Accordingly, when, in 216 B.C., the
government had first taken measures for raising new
armies, for providing the means of defence, and for prose-
cuting the war vigorously in every direction, it occupied
itself with the task of filling up the numerous vacancies
in the senate.^ It was found necessary to make a whole-
sale addition of new senators, such as had been made,
according to tradition, by Brutus after the expulsion of
the kings. For this extraordinary measure the official
authority of a regular censor seemed to be insufficient.
Becourse was had therefore to the dictatorship, an office
which in times of special difficulties had always rendered
excellent service to the state. The disastrous year of the
battle of Cannse, 216 e.g., had not yet come to an end, and
the dictator M. Junius Pera ' was still in office, occupied
with organizing the means of defence. As it seemed un-
advisable to divert his attention from his more immediate
duties, a proposal was made and adopted to elect a second
dictator for the special purpose of raising the senate to its
normal number— an innovation which shows that, under
extraordinary circumstances, the Romans were not entirely
the slaves of custom, but could adapt their institutions to
the requirements of the time. C. Terentius Varro was
called upon to nominate to the dictatorship the oldest of
those who had discharged the office of censors before.
This was M. Fabius Buteo, who had been consul in 245 3.0.^
five years before the close of the first Punic war, and
censor in 241 at the time when that war was concluded.
> Liry, xxiii. 22. * See above, p. 243.
fi.C.
THE SECOND PUNIC WAB. 287
In the debate which now took place in the senate with CHAP.
VIII
respect to the nomination of new members, Spurius -_ , _-
Carvilius proposed to admit two men from every Latin ^^^^
town. Never was a wiser proposal made than this, and 216-212
no season was more suitable than the present ' for rein-
vigorating the Roman people with new blood, and for
spreading the feeling and the right of citizenship over
Italy. The Latins were in every respect worthy to be
admitted to a share in the Boman franchise, and without
their fidelity and courage Rome would undoubtedly have
lost her preponderance in Italy and perhaps her independ-
ence. If now the best men from the several Latin towns
had been received as representatives of those towns into the
Boman senate, a step would have been taken leading to a
sort of representative constitution, and tending to diminish
the monopoly of legislative power enjoyed by the urban
population of Rome, a monopoly which became more and
more injurious and unnatural with the territorial exten-
sion of the republic. As yet no Latin town had exhibited
the least system of discontent or disloyalty, and a generous
and conciliatory policy on the part of Rome could not
have been looked upon as a result of fear or of intimida-
tion. But the Roman pride revolted now, as it had done
more than a century before, and as it did again more than
a century later,' at the idea of admitting strangers to an
equality with Romans ; and Spurius CarvUius was silenced
almost as if he had been a traitor to the majesty of Rome.
His proposal was treated as if it had not been made, and
the senators were bound not to divulge it,^ lest the Latins
should venture to hope that hereafter they might possibly
gain admission into the sanctuary of the Roman senate.
* The Boman sentiment is expressed in the words which Livy puts into the
mouth of Q. Fabius (xxiii. 22) : ' Kunquam rei iillius alieniore tempore men-
tionem factam in senatUi quam inter tarn snspensos sociohim animos incer-
tamqne fidem id tactnm, qnod insuper soUicitaret eoe/
' In 340 and 90 b.c.
' Livy, xxiii. 22 : 'Si qnid unquam aicani sanctire ad silendnm in cnria
f^ierit, id omnium maxime tegendum occulendum obliviscendom, pro non dicto
habendum esse. Ita eius rei oppressa mentio est.'
Financial
difficulties.
288 ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK A list of one hundred and seventy-seven new senators was
IV . .
^ — - drawn np, consisting of men who had discharged public
oflSces, or proved themselves to be valiant soldiers. As soon
as Fabius had performed this formal duty, he abdicated
the dictatorship.
The most difficult task which the reorganised senate had
to perform was to restore order in the finances, or rather
to provide means for continuing the war. The public
treasury was empty, the demands made upon the state for
the maintenance of the fleets and armies became greater
from year to year, and in the same proportion the resources
of the state were diminished.* The revenues of Sicily and
Sardinia were not even sufficient for the support of the
forces necessary for the defence of these islands, and could
not therefore be applied to other purposes. A large portion
of Italy was in possession of the enemy, and all its produce
was lost to Bome. The tithes and rents of the state
domains, the pastures, woods, mines, and saltworks in
Campania, Samnium, Apulia, Lucania, and Bruttium were
no longer paid, or not paid with regularity. Even where
the enemy was not in actual possession, the war had
reduced the public income. Many thousand citizens and
tax-payers had fallen in battle or were in captivity ; the
scarcity of hands began to tell on the cultivation of the
land ; the families whose heads or supporters were serving
in the army fell into poverty and debt, and the republic
had already contracted loans in Sicily and Sardinia which
it was unable to repay .^ The senate now adopted the
plan of doubling the taxes,^ a most unsafe expedient^ by
which the extreme limit of the tax-paying power of the
community could not fail soon to be reached or passed,
and which accordingly paralysed this power for the future.
But even this measure was not sufficient. Large sums of
ready money .were wanted to purchase supplies of pro-
visions, clothing, and materials of war for the armies. The
senate appealed to the patriotism of the rich, and the con-
' Livj, xxiii. 48. * See above, p. 279, note 2.
. • Livy, xxiii. 31.
THK SECOND PUNIC WAR, 289
sequence was the formation of three companies of army CHAP,
purveyors, who undertook to supply all that was needed w , '^^
and to give the public credit till the end of the war. They ^^^^^^
only stipulated for freedom from military service for them- 216-212
selves, and required that the state should undertake the
sea and war risks ^ of the cargoes afloat. This offer
seemed noble and generous; but experience showed that the
most sordid motives had more share in it than patriotism
or public spirit.
To obtain a supply of rowers for the fleet, the wealthier Financial
class of citizens were called upon to furnish, in proportion °i^^^^®-
to their property, from one to eight men, and food for a
period of from six to twelve months.* In proposing this
measure, the senate gave a proof of its devotion to the
common cause ; for the senators, as belonging to the richest
class in the state, had to contribute most. But the middle
class would not be surpassed by the senatorial order.
Horsemen and officers refused to take pay,* and the
owners of the slaves who had been drafted for military
service waived their right to compensation for their loss.
The undertakers of public works and of repairs of temples
and public buildings promised to wait till the conclusion
of peace before claiming payment; trust moneys were
applied to the use of the state :* a universal enthusiasm had
seized the whole nation. Every individual citizen looked for
his own safety only in the safety of the commonwealth, and
to save the commonwealth no sacrifice was held too dear.*
One of the financial measures of this time, dating from Commis-
the year 216 B.C., was the appointment of a commission,^ y°i" °
similar, as we may suppose, to that which in the year '-^i^ bc
S52 B.o.^ relieved the debts of a great mass of the people
by loans on sufficient security. But no satisfactory account
' Livy, xziii. 48. • Iii^Ji xxiv. 11.
■ Livy, i^iv. 18. * Livy, xxiv. 18.
* This conviction is beautifully e^xpressed in the words which Livy (xxvi. 36)
puts into the mouth of the consul Lsevinus : 'Bee publica incolumis et privataa
res facile salvas pitestat ; publica prodendo tua nequicquam serves.'
• * Triumviri mensarii.' — liyy^ xriii. 20i.
» See vol. i. p. 343.
VOL. !!• V
290 EOMAN HISTOKY.
BOOK is given of tlie proceedings of this commission, and we may
A — ' reasonably doubt whether it effected much. It is one of
the most difficult, and as yet unsolved, problems of finan-
cial skill to procure money where there is none. Paper
has been a great temporary resource to modem financiers.
But the Romans were innocent of this contrivance, and it
is not likely, therefore, that they effected more than the
alchemists of the middle ages, who vainly sought the secret
of changing base metal into gold.^
Sumptiiaiy In times of extreme danger, when the commonwealth
is suffering from an insufficiency of means, it seems un->
natural and unjustifiable that private citizens should
indulge in an unnecessary display of riches. On the con-
trary it seems just that private wealth should be made to
minister to the necessities of the state. This, at any rate,
was the feeling of the Bomans when they strained every
nerve \jo make head against Carthage. They hit upon
the idea of limiting private extravagance. On the motion
of the tribune C. Oppius, a law was passed forbidding the
women to apply more than half an ounce of gold for their
personal ornaments, to dress in coloured (i.e. purple) robes,
and to drive within the town in carriages.* This law was
enforced ; but the Boman ladies found it a great hardship,
and submitted to it with a heavy heart as long as the war
lasted, but not longer, as we shall see in the sequel.
Amonnt of The extraordinary measures adopted for replenishing:
the Koman „ , ,. , , „ ^ .^ .
levies. the public treasury were not superfluous. For the commg
year Rome maintained not less than twenty-one legions
and a fleet of one hundred and fifty vessels.' The war
assumed larger proportions from year to year, and baffied
all the calculations which had been made at its commence-
' If, as was afterwards related, one thousand ponnds of gold, being the
ransom of Rome which Camillus took from the Gauls, had been kept at that
time in the temple of the Capitoline Jupiter, it seems that even the priests
would have consented to take this sum at present for the service of the state,
at least on loan. See vol. i. p. 273.
• Livy, xxiv. 1.
• Livy (xxiv. 11), it is true, mentions only eighteen legions, but he neglects
to speak cf the threo which were in Snain.
THE SECOND PUNIC WAB. 291
ment, when one consular army in Spain and one in Africa CHAP,
were supposed to be sufficient to resist the power of Car- ., . '_^
thage. Eight legions alone were required to keep Hannibal ^™^
in check; three were employed in the north of Italy 216-212
against the Gauls ; one was kept ready near Brundusium ^'^'
to meet the expected attack of the king of Macedonia ;
two formed the garrison of Rome ; two held Sicily, and
two Sardinia. Including the army engaged in Spain, the
Eoman land and sea forces cannot have amounted to less
than 200,000 men, that is, one-fourth of the population of
Italy capable of bearing arms.
The i-esults accomplished were not what might have Reeoveiy
been expected from this prodigious display of strength, '^^I'^^l
although Fabius and Marcellus, the two ablest generals repulse of
that Rome possessed, were elected consuls for the year at Nola.
214. The events of this year are of trifling importance,
and can be summed up in a few words. Hannibal was
prevented from gaining more ground in Italy; his attempts
to get possession of Neapolis, Tarentum, and Puteoli were
thwarted ; his lieutenant Hanno, with an army consisting
chiefly of Bruttians and Lucanians, was defeated near
Beneventum by Gracchus, who commanded the corps of
6,000 slaves raised after the battle of Cannae, and now
rewarded their courage by giving them their freedom.*
Hannibal, it is alleged,' was repulsed a third time by
Marcellus at Nola, and (what was for him the greatest loss)
Casilinum was retaken by the Romans, owing to the treason
and cowardice of 2,000 Campanian soldiers of the garrison,
who, by betraying the town and seven hundred men of
Hannibal's troops, sought to purchase their own safety.*
* Is it mere chance that it was a Gracchus who erected a temple of * Liberty *
(Lxvy, zxiv. 16), and again a Gracchus who was the first to enfhinchise a great
number of slaves ?
• LiTy, xxiv. 17.
■ Livjr's narrative (xxiy. 19") is somewhat obscure. It appears that the
2,000 Campanians surrendered to the consul Fabius on condition of being
allowed to leave the town unmolested and to retire to Capua. But when they
were in the act of evacuating Casilinum, the consul Marcellus broke the
capitulation, penetrated into the town, and ordered an attack upon the retiring
garrison. Only 500 Campanians, who had already gained the open oountry^
17 2
293 ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK Meanwhile tlie king of Macedonia did not make tlid ex-
IV.
. pected attack on Italy. The Gauls, after their great
ictory over Postumius early in the year 215/ remained
quiet; several Samnite communities that had revolted
were again subdued by the Romans and severely punished.
It seemed that Hannibal must soon be crushed by the
overwhelming power of his enemies, whilst the reinforce-
ments for which he looked were delayed, and his friends
and allies became either lukewarm or weak. Yet the
terror of his name was undiminished. He was a power in
himself, independent of aU co-operation from without, and
no Roman general ventured as yet to attack him, even
with the greatest superiority of numbers.
Revolution Meanwhile a revolution had taken place in Sicily which
in an unexpected manner revived the hopes of Carthage.
Hiero's grandson and successor, Hieronymus, a boy of
fifteen, was entirely guided by a few ambitious men and
women, who deluded themselves with the hope of being
able to make use of the war between Rome and Carthage
for the aggrandisement of the power of Syracuse and of
the royal house.* Andranodoros and Zoippos, the sons-in-
law of Hiero, and Themistos, the husband of a daughter of
Gelon, having put aside, soon after Hiero's death, the
council of regency of fifteen members which had been
were safely conducted to Capua by order of Fabius. The rest of the Gam-
panians, and the 700 men of Hannibal's army, were either cut down or sent as
prisoners to Rome, The pretext for this action of Marcellus, which looks
very much like treachery, was, according to Livy, that * Casilinum was taken by
a sudden assault, whilst the garrison was negotiating for a capitulation and
hesitating/ "We feel here the want of an independent historian. No doubt a
Carthaginian would represent as an act of outrageous perfidy what, even under
the skilful colouring of a Koman patriot, appears as a very doubtful transaction.
The inhabitants of Casilinum were sent to the neighbouring towns to be kept
as prisoners. Here the question arises who these inhabitants were. Of the
original inhabitants of Casilinum, those whose loyalty to Rome was suspected
had been put to death by the Roman garrison during the first siege (see above,
p. 265). The remainder, we may suppose, were faithful to Rome, unless
after the takiil^ of Casilinum by Hannibal these were expelled, and new
settlers introduced of the Carthaginian party in and about Capua.
* See above, p. 271.
» Folybius, vii. 6, § 4,
THE SECOND PUNIC WAE. 293
established by Hiero for the guidance of his youthful sue- CHAP,
cesser, persuaded the boy that he was old enough to be ^_ ^ ^ ^
independent of guardians and counciUors, and thus they ^»
practically seized the government themselves. In vain 216-212
the dying Hiero had conjured his family to continue his ^'^'
policy of a close alliance with Eome, which had so far
proved eminently successful. They were not satisfied with
simply preserving the government of Syracuse and the
small part of Sicily which the Bomans had allowed Hiero
to retain. Seeing no chance of enlarging the Syracusan
dominion by free concessions on the part of the Romans,
they directed their hopes towards Cai*thage, which after
the battle of Cannae seemed to them to have gained a
decided superiority.
Hiero had scarcely closed his eyes when Hieronymus Negotia-
opened communications with Carthage. Hannibal, who between
in the midst of his military operations watched and guided Hannibal
the policy of the Carthaginian government, sent to Syra- Hierony-
cuse two men who were eminently fitted by their descent ^^'
and abilities to act as negotiators between the two states.
These were two brothers, Hippokrates and Epikydes,
Carthaginians by birth and Syracusan s by descent, their
grandfather having been expelled from his native country
by the tyrant Agathokles, and having settled in Carthage
ODd married a Carthaginian wife.^ They had long served in
Hannibal's army, and were equally distinguished as soldiers
and as politicians. As soon as they arrived in Syracuse,
they exercised unboimded influence as the advisers of
Hieronymus. They promised him at first the possession of
half the island, and when they found that his wishes went
further, they at once agreed that he should be king of all
Sicily after the expulsion of the Romans. It was not
worth while, the Carthaginians thought, to haggle about
the price to be paid to so valuable an ally, especially as
the payment was to be made at the expense of the common
enemy. These transactions between Hieronymus and
V PolybkiSi vii. 2.
294 ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK Carthage could not be carried on in secret. They became
^■■■,' known to Appius Claudius, who, commanding as prsetor
in Sicily in 215, repeatedly sent messengers to Syracuse,
warning the king of any steps which might endanger his
friendly relations with Eome.^ In truth Bome ought to
have at once declared war; but she was little inclined,
and not at all prepared, in the year after Canme to meet
a new enemy, and Claudius probably entertained hopes of
gaining his end without a rupture, either by intimidation
or by an internal revolution in Syracuse.
Kepub- Such hopes were not unfounded ; for, immediately after
reaction in the death of Hiero, a republican party had been formed at
Syracuse, gyracuse, headed by the wealthiest and most influential citi-
zens. The turbulent Syracusans had now quietly submitted
for an unusually long time to a stable and orderly govern-
ment. As during Hiero's lifetime all opposition would
have been nipped in the bud by the king's popularity, not
less than by his prudence and caution, the republicans had
not stirred; but Hieronymus inspired contempt by his
folly and arrogance, and he provoked the enemies of
despotism by showing that he possessed the qualities, not
of his grandfather, but of the worst tyrants that had pre-
ceded him. Whilst Hiero, in his dress and mode of
living, had made no distinction between himself and the
simple citizens, Syracuse now, as in the days of the tyrant
Dionysius, saw her ruler surrounded by royal pomp, wear-
ing a diadem and purple robes, and followed by armed
body-guards. His authority was no longer based on the
willing submission of the people, but on foreign mer-
cenaries and on the lowest popidace, who had always
hailed the advent of tyrants, and hoped from them a share
in the spoils of the rich. The better class of citizens
desired the overthrow of despotic government and an
alliance with the Bomans, the natural friends and patrons
of the aristocratic party.
Death of The fermentation continued during the remainder of the
Hierony-
mu8.
> Polybiufl, Yii. 3. Liyy, xxiv. 6.
THE SECOND PUNIC WAR. 295
year 215. One of the conspirators was discovered and CHAP.
crueUy tortured, but died without naming his accomplices. sJ^HL.
Many innocent persons were put to death, and Hieronymus, ^^^
thinking himself safe, was prosecuting his schemes for the 210-212
enlargement of his kingdom in 214, when he was betrayed
by one of his own body-guard into the hands of the con-
spirators, who killed him as he was passing through a
narrow lane in the city of Leontini. This deed was the
signal for one of those sanguinary civil wars which so
often convulsed the unhappy city of Syracuse. Whilst the
body of Hieronymus lay neglected in the street at Leontini,
the conspirators rushed back to Syracuse, to call the
people to arms and to liberty. A rumour of what had
happened had preceded them, and when they arrived in
the evening, bearing the blood-stained cloak and the
diadem of the tyrant, the whole town was in a fever of
excitement. When the death of Hieronymus became
known for certain, the people rushed into the temples and
tore from the walls the Gallic arms which Hiero had
received from the Eomans as his share of the booty after
the victory at Telamon. Sentinels were placed in different
parts of the town, and all important posts were secured.
In the course of the night the whole of Syracuse was in
the power of the insurgents, with the exception of the
island Ortygia.
This small island was the place where the first Greek Sarrmder
colonists had settled. As the town increased in population, ^y Andm*
the inhabitants removed to the adjoining mainland, and nodoros.
the island Ortygia became the fortress of Syracuse. A
narrow strip of land connected it with the mainland, but
the access was defended by strong lines of wall. Behind
these walls the masters of Syracuse had frequently defied
their insurgent subjects, and from this stronghold they had
issued to regain their authority. For a moment this was
now attempted by Andranodoros, who after the death of
Hieronymus was the head of the royal family, and was
stimulated by his ambitious wife Damarate, the daughter
of Hiero, to resist the insurgents and to uphold the cause
296
EOMAN HISTORY.
BOOK
IV.
Massacre
of the
frtmily of
Hiero.
of monarcliy. But he found that a part of the garrison of
Ortygia was inclined to side with the conspirators, and
there was, consequently, nothing left to him but to declare
his adhesion to the popular cause and to deliver up to the
republicans the keys of the fortress. He even affected zeal
in joining the revolutionary party, and was elected as one
of the magistrates to govern the new republic. The cause
of liberty triumphed, and with it the policy of those sensible
and moderate men who wished to remain faithful to the
Roman alliance. Hippokrates and Epikydes, the agents
of Hannibal, found that their mission had failed, and that
they could no longer safely remain in Syracuse. They
requested a safe-conduct to return to Italy into HannibaFs
camp.
But Andranodoros had not given up the hope of preserv-
ing the dominion over Syracuse for himself and the family
of Hiero. He was suspected, justly or unjustly, of a plan
for overthrowing the republican government and for assas-
sinating its chiefs. Impartial inquiry and fair trial were
never thought of in the civil broils of Syracuse. The party
that brought forward an accusation acted at the same
time as judge and executioner, and resorted to violence and
treachery without the least scruple. Accordingly, when
Andranodoros one day entered the senate with his kinsman
Themistos, the husband of Gelon's daughter, they were
both seized and put to death. Nor did their death seem a
sufficient guarantee for the safety of the republic against
a restoration of the monarchy. It was resolved to root
out the whole family of Hiero. Murderers were dispatched
to the palace, which now became a scene of the most
atrocious carnage. Damarate, the daughter, and Harmonia,
the grand-daughter, of Hiero, were murdered first. Hera-
kleia, another daughter of Hiero, and wife of Zoippos, who
was at that time absent in Egypt, fled with her two youth-
ful daughters into a domestic sanctuary, and in vain
implored mercy for herself and her innocent children.
She was dragged away from the altar and butchered.
Her daughters, besprinkled with their mother's blood, only
THE. SECOND PUNIC WAU. 297
prolonged their sufferings by trying to escape, and fell at CHAP,
last Tinder the blows of their pursuers^ Thns was JEj^
destroyed the house of a prince who had ruled over p^^J^D
Syracuse for half a century, and had been universally 216-212
admired and envied as one of the wisest, happiest, and
best of men.
This deed of horror bore evil finits to the authors. It Cduntor
could not fail to bring about a reaction in public opinion, jn sypa-
and consequently when, soon affcer, two new magistrates ^^^*
were elected in the place of Andranodoros and Themistos,
the choice of the people fell on Hippokrates and Epikydes,
who, in the hope of some such chance, had prolonged their
stay in Syracuse, and had, no doubt, in doing so risked their
lives. Their election was evidently to be attributed to
the populace and the army, which began to exercise more
and more influence in the civil affairs of Syracuse, and a
considerable part of which consisted of Eoman deserters,
who wished at all hazards to bring about a rupture with
Home.* From this moment began the counter-revolution,
which was soon followed by the most deplorable anarchy*
When the magistrates showed their desire to renew the
Roman alliance, and for this purpose sent messengers to
^he prsetor and received Eoman messengers in return, the
people and the army began to be agitated. The agitation
increased when a Carthaginian fleet showed itself in the
neighbourhood of Pachynus, inspiring the enemies of
Eome with confidence and courage. When, therefore,
Appius Claudius, to coimteract this movement, appeared
with a Boman fleet at the mouth of the harbour, the
Carthaginian party thought themselves betrayed, and the
crowd rushed tumultuously into the port to resist a landing
of the Eomans, if they should attempt it.'
> Livy, mv. 26. • Liry, xxiv. 23, 10.
• Livy, xxiv. 27. We are here involuntarily reminded of the events which
in 282 led to the war with Tarentnm. In both cases, the Roman fleet came to
the support of a Koman party. But in Tarentum it appears that the govern-
ment was in the hands of the democrats hostile to Borne, while in Syracuse*
with the exception of Hippokrates and Epikydes, the magistrates belonged to
the Koman party. The Bomans might therefore claim a formal right to entei^
298 EOMAN HISTORY.
BOOK Thus the unhappy town was torn by two hostile parties;
IV.
. nor was the form of government the only object of conten-
Triumph *^^^' The independence and the very existence of Syracuse
of the were involved in the struggle. For a time it seemed that
ginian the government, and with it the friends of Eome, would
party at prevail. The greatest obstacles in the way of an arrange-
ment with Eome were the two Carthaginian brothers, who,
from being the agents and messengers of Hannibal, had
been elected among the Syracusan magistrates. K these
two men coidd be got rid of, the government, it was thought,
was strong enough to carry out its policy of reconciliation
with Rome. Force could not be employed against men
who enjoyed the favour of a great mass of the people and
were the idols of the soldiers. But a decent pretext was
not wanting. The town of Leontini asked for military
protection. Hippokrates was sent thither with a body of
4,000 men. But no sooner did he find himself in pos-
session of an independent command than he began to act
in direct opposition to the government. He incited the
people of Leontini to assert their independence of Syracuse,
and, to precipitate matters, he surprised and cut to pieces
a military post of the Bomans on the frontier, and thus de
facto commenced the war with Borne. As yet, however,
the government of Syracuse was not compromised by this
act of hostility. They disavowed all participation in this
violation of the still existing alliance, and offered to put
down the rebellion of Hippokrates and the Leontinians in
conjunction with a Boman force. The Boman prsetor
Marcellus, however, did not wait for the co-operation of
the Syracusan force, which, 8,000 strong, left Syracuse
under the command of their *strategoi.* Before they
arrived Marcellus had taken Leontini by force, and had
inflicted severe punishment on the rebels and mutineers.
Two thousand Boman deserters who had been taken in
the town were scourged and beheaded. Hippokrates and
his brother escaped with difSculty to the neighbouring
the harbour of Syracuse, as the allies of the goTemment ; but even this plea
was wanting in the case of Tarentum. — See toL i. p. 489 ft.
THE SECOND PUNIC WAR. 299
fort of Herbessos. Again the Carthaginian party seemed chap.
annihilated, but again the cruelty shown by their oppo- -_ ; \ -
nents brought about a reaction. When the Sj^racusan ^^^^
troops, on their march to Leontini, heard of the storming 216-212
of the town by the Eomans, and of the terrible punishment ^'^
inflicted on the citizens, and especially on the captive
soldiers, they feared that their government would deliver
up all the deserters among them to the vengeance of the
Bomans. They not only refused, therefore, to attack
Hippokrates and Epikydes in Herbessos, but, fraternising
with them,^ drove away their officers and marched back to
Syracuse under the command of the very men whom they
had been sent to capture. In Syracuse an exaggerated
report had been spread of the brutality of the Eomans in
Leontini, and had revived the ill-feeling of the populace
towards the Komans. In spite of the resistance of the
strategoi the soldiers were admitted into the town, and
this was the signal for all the worst horrors of anarchy.
The slaves were set free, the prisons broken open and the
inmates let loose, the strategoi murdered or expelled, their
houses ransacked. Syracuse was now at the mercy of the
populace, the soldiers, deserters, slaves, and condemned
ofibnders ; the only men enjoying anything like authority
and obedience were Hippokrates and Epikydes. The Car-
thaginian party was completely triumphant, and the
Bomans, in addition to their numerous difficulties, had
now a new and most arduous task imposed on them — ^the
reduction by force of the principal town of Sicily, v^hich
in the hands of the Carthaginians made the whole island
an unsafe possession, and cut off all prospect of ending the
war by a descent on the African coast.
Sosls, one of the expelled strategoi, and a leader of the Mmh of
republican movement from the very beginning, brought to Marcellw
' On this occasion, a corps of 600 Cretans is mentionedi whom Hiero had sent
as an aoxiliaiy force to the Eomans in 217. These men had been taken
prisoners in the battle of the lake Thrasymenus, dismissed by Hannibal, and
sent back to Syracuse. They were the first to fraternise with Hippokrates and
Epikydes, having served under them, and feeling themselves to be under an
obligation to Hannibal. — Livy, zziv. 30.
800
ROMAN HISTORY.
book:
IV.
to Syra-
cuse.
Military
resourced
of Syra-
cuse.
Marcellus the news of what had happened. The Roman
general at once marched upon Syracuse, and took up a
position on the south side of the town, near the temple of
the Olympian Zeus and not far from the great harbour,
while Appius Claudius anchored with the fleet in front of
the town. The oldest part of Syracuse was in the small
island Ortygia, which separates the large harbour in the
south from a much smaller one on the north. On this
island was the famous fountain of Arethousa, which seemed
to gush forth, even from the sea, at a place where, according
to a myth, the nymph — who, as she fled from the river-god
Alpheios, had thrown herself into the sea from the shores
of Elis — ^had re-appeared above the waters. Such islands,
near to the mainland, easy of defence and containing good
anchoring-ground, were on all the coasts of the Mediter-
ranean the favourite spots where the Phoenicians used to
settle in the primeval period long before the wanderings
of the Greeks.
On this island accordingly, as in many similar places, a
Phoenician settlement had preceded the Greeks ; but when
here, as on the whole eastern half of Sicily, the Semitic
traders retired before the warlike Greeks, the latter soon
became too numerous for the islet of Ortygia. They
extended their settlement to the mainland of Sicily, and
buUt anew town, called Achradina, along the sea-coast, on
the north side of the original town on the islet. Achradina
became now the principal part of Syracuse, whilst Ortygia,
more and more cleared of private dwellings, became a
fortress, containing the palaces of the successive tyrants,
the magazines, the treasure-houses, and the barracks for
the mercenaries. It was strongly fortified all round, but
especially on the northern side, where a narrow artificial
neck of land connected it with the nearer portions of
Syracuse. It thus formed a formidable stronghold, and
its possession was indispensable for those who wished to
control the town. During the memorable siege of Syra-
cuse in the Peloponnesian war by the Athenian armament,
•
the town consisted only of the two parts — the inland of
THE. SECOND PUNIC WAB. 801
Ortygia and Achradina ; but at a subsequent period there CHAP.
^iTOse on the western side of the latter two suburbs, called ^, , ',#
Tyche and Neapolis, each of which was, like Achradina and -^^^^
Oitygia, surrounded with walls and separately fortified. 216-212
Dionysius the elder considerably enlarged the circum- ^'^'
ference of the town by fortifying the northern and south-
western side of the whole slope called Epipolse, which, in
the form of a triangle, rose with a gradual incline to a point
called Euryalus, in the west of Achradina, Tyche, and
Neapolis. Thus a large space was included in the fortifi-
cations of Syracuse ; but this space was never quite covered
with buildings, and the population was not large enough,
even in the most flourishing period, to man efiFectually the
whole extent of wall, amounting to eighteen miles ; but the
natural strength of the town made the defence more easy.
The walls, which from the northern and southern extre-
inities of the older town ran westward and converged at the
fort Euryalus, stood on precipitous rocks, and were there-
fore easily defended, even by a comparatively small number
of troops. Moreover Hiero had in his long reign accu-
mulated in abundance all possible means of defence.^ The
ingenious Archimedes, liberally supported by his royal
friend, was in possession of all material and scientific
resources for the construction of the most perfect engines
of war that the world had hitherto seen. If we recollect
Jiow often Hiero in the first Punic war supplied the
Bomans with munitions of war, and that he gave fifty
ballistce to the Bhodians after the earthquake, we may
form an idea of the extensive scale on which machinery
of this kind must have been manufactured in Syracuse,
and how large a stock must have been there ready for use.
The attempts of Marcellus to take Syracuse by storm Failure of
failed, accordingly, in the most signal manner. On the atumptaof
^ Livy, zxiy. 84, 13 : ' Sed ea quoque pan eodem omni apparatu tormentorum
instnicta erat, Hieronis impensis curaque per multos annos, Archimedis tmica
arte. Natura etiam adiuyabat loci, quod saxnm cui imposita muri fimdamenta
8unt ma^a parte ita proclive est, ut non solum missa tormento, sed etiam qusD
pondere suo provoluta essent, graviter in hostem inciderent ; eadem causa ad
subeundum arduum aditum instabilemque ingressum prsebebaC
302
ROMAN mSTOBY.
BOOK
IV.
* , '
Marcellus
to storm
Syracuse.
Cartha-
ginian OpO'
rations m
Sicily.
land side the wall-crested rocks defied all tlie usual modes
of attack with ladders, movable towers, or battering-rams.
On the sea-front of Achradina sixty Boman vessels,
venturing to approach the walls, lashed two-and-two to-
gether, and carrying wooden towers and battering-rams,
were driven back by an overwhelming shower of great and
small missiles from the bastions and from behind the loop-
holed walls; some ships, caught by iron hooks, were
raised partly out of the water, and then dashed back,
to the dismay of the crews, so that at length they appre-
hended danger when they only saw a beam or a rope on
the wall, which might turn out to be a new instrument of
destruction invented by the dreaded Archimedes.' Mar-
cellus saw that it was of no use to persist in his attacks.
Syracuse, which had repeatedly resisted the power of Car^
thage and the Athenian armada, was indeed not likely to
be taken by force.' He therefore gave up the siege, but
remained in the neighbourhood in a strong position for
the purpose of watching the town and cutting oflF sup-
plies and reinforcements. It was impossible to blockade
Syracuse by a regular circumvallation, on account of the
vast extent of her walls ; and this would have been useless,
even if it had been possible, so long as the harbour was
open to the Carthaginian fleet.
From the moment when Syracuse passed over from the
Boman to the Carthaginian alliance, the chief momentum
of the war seemed shifted from Italy to Sicily. The
attention of both the belligerent nations was again turned
to the scene of their first great struggle, and thither both
now sent new fleets and armies. It was Hannibal himself
who advised the Carthaginian government to send rein-
forcements to Sicily instead of Italy.* The Bomans had
already a considerable force on the island, and now sent a
new legion, which, as Hannibal blocked the land road
* Polybius and Livy say nothing of the wonderful reflecting mirrors with
which Archimedes is said to have fired the Koman vessels at a distance. The
oldest historian to whom this story can be traced is Dion Cassius (Zonaras,
ix. 4). It may therefore be considered a fable.
• Livy, xxiv. 34; xxv. 23. • Livy, xxiv. 36.
THE SECOND PUNIC WAR. 808
throngh Lucania ami Bruttium, was conveyed by sea from CHAP.
Ostia to Panormus. Of the exact strength of the Roman .^ , ' .^
armies in Sicily we are not informed. The garrisons of ^^^
the numerous towns must have absorbed a great number 216-212
of troops, apart from the force engaged before Syracuse.
A considerable portion of Sicily was inclined to rebellion,
and in several places rebellion had already broken out.
The towns of Helorus, Herbessus, and Megara, which had
revolted, were retaken by Marcellus and destroyed, as a
warning to all those that were wavering in their fidelity.
Nevertheless, as at this very time Himilco had landed with
15,000 Carthaginians and twelve elephants at Heraclea in
the west of the island, the insurrection against Rome
spread, under the protection and encouragement of the
Carthaginian arms. Agrigentum, though destroyed in the
first Punic war, was still of great importance, from the
strength of its position. Marcellus marched upon it in all
haste from Syracuse, to prevent its being occupied by the
Carthaginians; but he came too late. Himilco had
already seized Agrigentum, and made it the base of his
operations. At the same time a fleet of fifty-five Car-
thaginian vessels entered the harbour of Syracuse, and
thereupon Himilco, advancing with his army, established
his camp under the southern walls of Syracuse, near the
river Anapus.
The situation of the Romans, close before the hostile Masgacre
town, and in the immediate vicinity of a hostile army, was LbitoSs
by no means satisfactory. But it became still worse when o^Ennaby
the town of Murgantia (probably in the vicinity of Syracuse) riiw.
where they had large magazines, was betrayed to the
Punians by the inhabitants.* The Romans now felt that
they were nowhere safe ; but, although their suspicions
justified not only precaution but even severity, we cannot,
even at this distance of time, read without indignation and
disgust the report of the way in which the Roman garri-
son of Enna treated a defenceless population on a mere
suspicion of treason. The town of Enna (Castro Giovanni),
* Livy, xxiv. 36.
804
ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK
IV.
Besults
of the
massacre.
situated in the central part of the island on an isolated
rock difficult of access, was of great importance on account
of the natural strength of its position. Ancient myths
called it the place where Persephonfi (Proserpina) the
daughter of Demeter, was seized by Hades, the god of the
regions beneath the earth. A temple of the goddess was
a national sanctuary for all the inhabitants of Sicily, and
conferred on Enna the character of a sacred city. In the
j&rst Punic war it had suffered much and had been re-
peatedly taken by one or the other belligerent. It had now
a strong Boman garrison, commanded by L. Pinarius. The
inhabitants, it appears, felt little attachment to Eome, and
probably L. Pinarius had good reason to be on his guard
day and night. But fear urged him to commit an act of
atrocity which rendered his own name infamous and
sullied the honour of his country. He called upon the
inhabitants of Enna to lay their requests before him in a
general assembly of the people. Meanwhile he gave secret
instructions to his men, posted sentinels all round the
public theatre where the popular assembly was held, and
upon a given signal the Roman soldiers rushed upon the
defenceless people, killed them indiscriminately, and then
sacked the town, as if it had been taken by storm,* The
consul Marcellus not only approved of this iniquitous deed
but rewarded the perpetrators, and allowed them to keep
the plunder of the unhappy town,* hoping, no doubt, thus
to terrify the vacillating Sicilians into obedience to Bome.
The carnage of Enna reminds us of similar acts of atro-
city committed by Italian warriors in Messana, Hhegium,
and more recently in Casilinum. But the crime had
never been so openly approved and rewarded by the first
' Iav/b description (xxiv. 39) of this carnage is a masterpiece : ' Milites
intonti dudum ac parati, alii supeme in aversam concionem clamore sublato
decnrrunt, alii ad exitus theatri conferti obsistunt. Cseduntur Ennenses cavea
inclusi coacervanturque non csede solum sed etiam fiiga, cum alii super aliorum
capita ruerent, atque integri sauciis, vivi mortuis incidentes, cumularentur.
Inde passim discurritur, et urbis captse modo fugaque et csedes omnia tenet,
nihilo remissiore militum ira, quod turbam inermem csedebant, quam si periculum
par et ardor certaminis eos irritaret.'
> Of course the plunder included the women and children.
THE SECOND PUNIC WAR.
305
representative of the Boman community. The defenders
of Casilinum had acted not only as murderers, but also as
brave soldiers; but L. Pinarius and his men were rewarded
with the spoils of their victims without showing that they
were as brave as they were treacherous, bloodthirsty, and
greedy. It seemed that the war rendered more ferocious
the minds of the men who were destined to receive and to
spread the civilisation of antiquity and to defend it from
the barbarians of the north and of the south.
The cruel punishment of Enna failed to produce the eflfect
which the Romans had expected. Hatred and aversion
acted even more powerfully than fear. The towns which had
as yet been only wavering in their allegiance joined the Car-
thaginian side all over Sicily. Himilco left his position
before Syracuse, and made expeditions in every direction
to organise and support the insurrection against Borne.
Thus passed the year 213 B.C. Towards its close, Marcellus,
with a part of his army, took up his vrinter-quarters in a
fortified camp five miles to the west of Syracuse, without
abandoning, however, the camp previously established
near the temple of the Olympian Zeus in the south of the
town.* Lacking the means of blockading the town, he
remained in the neighbourhood only in the hope of obtain-
ing possession of it by some stratagem, or by treason.
The result showed that his calculations were just. The
republican party in Syracuse was indeed vanquished and
broken up by the soldiers and the populace; and its chiefs,
• The chronological order of the events in Sicily cannot be fixed satis-
factorily. It is probable that Msircellus reached Sicily late in the year 214, as
in the earlier part of that year ho was occupied in Campania (Liry, xxir. 13 ff.),
and afterwards was ill (ibid. 20). As he did not advance immediately upon
Syracuse, the siege possibly began either quite at the end of 214, or, us seems
more likely, in 213. At any rate, the events which followed the fruitless
attempts at storming the town belong to the latter year. From Livy's account
it would appear that all this took place in 214. This, howevpr, must be an
error. See Weissenbom's note to Livy xxiv. 39. According to Polybius
(viii. 9, § 6), the siege of Syracuse lasted eight months longer after the plan
of taking it by storm was given up. But the town was not taken before, the
autumn of 212 (Livy, xxv. 26), in the third year after the commencement of
the siege (Livy, xxv. 31). The account of Polybius does not agree with this
•tatument ; probably the numbers in his text are corrupt
VOL. II. X
CHAP.
VIII.
Third
Period,
216-212
B.C.
Siege of
Syracuse
by Mar-
cellus.
806 ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK the murderers of Hieronymns and of the family of Hiero,
^ / , were in exile, mostly in the Eoman camp. All power was
in the hands x)f the foreign mercenaries and deserters,
and Syracuse was de facto a Carthaginian fortress under
the command of Hippokrates and Epikydes. Nevertheless
the republican party found the means of keeping up with
the Bomans a regular correspondence, the object of which
was to deliver up the town into their hands. In fishing
boats, hidden under nets, messengers were secretly de-
spatched from the harbour of Syracuse into the Roman
camp, and found their way back in the same manner.
Thus were discussed and settled the conditions under
which the town was to be betrayed. Marcellus promised
that the Syracusans should be restored to the same position
which they had occupied as Eoman allies imder King
Hiero; they were to retain their liberty and their own
laws. All the preparations were already made for carrying
out the proposed plan, when it became known to Epikydes,
and eighty of the conspirators were put to death. Thus
baffled, Marcellus nevertheless persevered in his scheme.
By his partisans he was informed of everything that took
place within the town. He knew that a great festival was
about to be celebrated to Artemis, which was to last for
three days. He justly expected that on this occasion
great laxity would be shown in guarding the walls. Mar-
cellus had observed that in one part of the fortifications,
on the northern side, the wall was so low that it could be
easily scaled with ladders. To this place he sent, on one
of the festive nights, a party of soldiers, who succeeded in
reaching the top of the wall, and, under the guidance of the
Syracusan Sosis, one of the conspirators, proceeded to the
gate called Hexapylon. Here the drunken guardsmen
were found sleeping and quickly dispatched, the gate was
opened, and the signal given to a body of Boman troops
outside to advance and enter the town. When the morn-
ing dawned, Epipolse, the upper part of the town, was in
the hands of the Eomans. The suburbs Tyche and
Neapolis, which in former times had been protected by
Third
Pebiod,
THE SECOND PUNIC WAR. 807
"walls on the side of Epipolse, were now probably open on CHAP,
the west, since Dionysius had constructed the wall which
inclosed the whole space of Epipoto. They could not,
therefore, be held for any longtime after theBomans were 2i5-2ri
inside the common wall. But on the extreme west point ^^'
of Epipoke, the strong detached fort Euryalus defied all
attacks. Marcellus was therefore still very far from being
master of Syracuse. Not only Euryalus and the island of
Ortygia, but Achradina, the largest and most important
part of Syracuse, had still to be taken; and these had lost
nothing of their strength by the fact that the suburbs
were now in the power of the Bomans. In truth the
siege of Syracuse lasted for some months longer, and the
difBculties of the Bomans were now doubled rather than
diminished. It is, therefore, a silly anecdote which
relates that when, on the morning after the taking of
Epipolse, Marcellus saw the rich town spread out before
his feet and now within his grasp, he shed tears of joy and
emotion.' He summoned the garrisons of Euryalus and
Achradina. The deserters who kept guard on the walls
of Achradina woidd not even allow the Soman heralds to
approach or to speak. On the other hand the commander
of Euryalus, a Greek mercenary from Argos called Philo-
demos, showed himself ready after a while to listen to the
proposals of the Syracusau Sosis, and evacuated the place.
Marcellus was now safe in his rear and had no longer to
apprehend a simultaneous attack from the garrison of the
town in front and from an army approaching by land in
his rear.* He encamped on the ground between the two
suburbs Tyche and Neapolis, and gave these up to be
plundered by his soldiers as a foretaste of the booty of
Syracuse. Soon after, a Carthaginian army, under Hippo-
krates and Himilco, marched upon Syracuse, and attacked
the Roman camp near the temple of Zeus Olympios, whilst,
simultaneously, Epikydes made a sally from Achradina
upon the other Boman camp between the suburbs. These
• IdTy, XXV. U, « Liv>*, xxr. 26.
z 2
308 ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK attacks failed. On every point the Bomans kept their
. ,1^ ground ; and thus the hostile forces within and before Syra-
cuse remained for some time in \he same relative position,
without being able to make an impression either one way
or the other. Meanwhile summer advanced, and a malig-
nant disease broke out in the Carthaginian camp, which
was pitched on the low ground by the river Anapus. In
times past the deadly climate of Syracuse had more than
once delivered the town from her enemies. Under the very
walls of the town a Carthaginian army had perished in
the reign of the elder Dionysius. Now the climate proved
as disastrous to the defenders as it had formerly done
to the besiegers of Syracuse. The Carthaginians were
struck down by the disease in masses. When a great
part of the men and of the officers, and among them
JBippokrates and Himilco themselves, had been carried oflF,
the remainder of the troops, consisting for the most part
of Sicilians, dispersed in different directions. The Bomans
also suffered from the disease ; but the higher parts of
Syracuse, where they were stationed, were more cool and
airy than the low ground on the banks of the Anapus ; and
moreover the houses of the suburbs Tyche and Neapolis
afforded shelter from the deadly rays of the sun, so that
the Roman loss was comparatively small. Nevertheless
Marcellus had, as yet, no prospect of taking by storm a
town so vigorously defended, nor could he reduce it by
famine, as the port was open to the Carthaginian vessels.
At this very time Carthage made renewed efforts to supply
Syracuse with provisions. Seven hundred transports, laden
with supplies, were dispatched to Sicily under the convoy
of one hundred and thirty ships of war. This fleet had
already reached Agrigentum when it was detained by
contrary winds. Epikydes, impatient of delay, left Syra-
cuse and proceeded to Agrigentum, for the purpose of
urging Bomilcar, the Carthaginian admiral, to make an
attack upon the B-oman fleet which lay at anchor near the
promontory of Pachynus. Bomilcar advanced with his
ships of war ; but, when the Bomans sailed to meet him,
THE SECOND PUNIC WAR. 809
he avoided them, and steered to Tarentnm, after having CHAP,
dispatched an order to the transports to return to Africa. '_-
The cause of this extraordinary proceeding does not appear Third
in the account handed down to us. If it be true, as Livy 215-212
reports,^ that Bomilcar's fleet was stronger than that of • ^'^'
the Bomans, it cannot have been fear which prevented him
from accepting battle. Perhaps he thought that his pre-
sence at Tarentum was more necessary than at Syracuse ;
perhaps he quarrelled with Epikydes. At any rate he left
to its own resources the town which he was sent to relieve,
and thus spread discouragement among its defenders and
hastened its fall.
From this moment the fate of Syracuse was sealed. Anarchy in
Epikydes himself probably lost all hope, as he did not Syracuse.
return, but remained in Agrigentum. Again the repub-
lican party took courage. The leaders of this party re-
newed negotiations with the Bomans, and again Marcellus
guaranteed the liberty and independence of Syracuse as
the price for surrendering the town. But the friends of
Bome were not able to fulfil the promises they had made.
The unhappy town was torn by a desperate straggle be-
tween the citizens and the soldiers. At first the citizens
had the advantage. They succeeded in killing the chief
officers appointed by Epikydes, and in electing republican
magistrates in their place, who were ready to hand the
town over to the Bomans. The lawless soldiery seemed
overpowered for a moment. But, after a short time, that
faction among the troops got the upper hand again who
had a just apprehension that their lives were in jeopardy
if they fell into the hands of the Bomans. The foreign
mercenaries were persuaded to resist to the last. Another
revolution followed. The republican magistrates were
murdered, and a general massacre and pillage si$;nalised
the final triumph of the enemies of Bome and of Syracuse.
The unhappy town resembled a helpless wreck, drifting
fast towards a reef whilst the crew, instead of battling with
> Idvy, xxT. 27.
310
ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK
IV.
Treachery
of Mtri-
cus.
Fall and
Back of
Syracuse.
the elements, spends its last strength in bloody internecine
strife.
Even now MareeUus did not make a direct attempt to
take Syracuse by force until he had secured the co-opera-
tion of a party in the town. The troops had chosen six
captains, each of whom was to defend a certain part of
the walls. Among these captains was a Spanish officer of
the name of Mericus, who commanded on the southern
side of Ortygia. Seeing that the town could not possibly
be held much longer, and that therefore it was high time
to make his peace if he wished to obtain favourable terms,
at least for those soldiers who were not deserters, he
entered secretly into negotiations with Marcellus. An
agreement was soon made. A barge approached at night
the southern extremity of Ortygia, and landed a party
of Roman soldiers, who were admitted through a postern-
gate into the fortification. On the following day Mar-
cellus ordered a general attack upon the walls of Achradina,
and whilst the garrison rushed from all parts, and also
from Ortygia to the threatened spot, Roman soldiers landed
in several ships unopposed on Ortygia and occupied the
place with a sufficient force. Having made sure of the
fact that Ortygia was in his power, Marcellus at once de-
sisted from any farther attack on Achradina, well knowing
that, after the fall of Ortygia, the defence of Achradina
would not be continued. His calculation proved correct.
During the following night the deserters found means of
escaping, and in the morning the gates were opened to
admit the victorious army.
Thus, at length, after a siege that had lasted more than
two years, the Romans reaped the fruit of their dogged
perseverance. If any town that had ever succumbed to
the Roman arms was justified in expecting a lenient, or
even a generous treatment, this town assuredly was Syra-
cuse.^ The invaluable services which Hiero had rendered
in the course of more than half a century, could not in
> Compare the just remarks of Livy, xxvi. 82.
B.C.
THE SECOND PUNIC WAR. 811
justice be considered as balanced by the follies of a child, CHAP,
and by the hostility of a political party with which the — ..-1
better class of Syracusan citizens had never sympathized, p^^^
From the very beginning of the sad complications and 215-212
revolutions at Syracuse, the true republican party, which
was attached to order and freedom, inclined to Rome and
wished to continue the foreign policy of Hiero. It was
they who conspired to put down the tyrant Hieronymus
and his anti-Roman relations and councillors. They had
attempted to rid themselves of the emissaries of Hannibal
and of their adherents in the army ; they were overpowered
without renouncing their plans ; they had made every
effort, in conjunction with their exiled friends who had
taken refuge in the camp of Marcellus, to deliver Syracuse
into the hands of the Romans; they had resisted the
reign of terror exercised by the foreign mercenaries and
the Roman deserters, and many of them lost their lives in
the attempt to deliver their native town from the tyranny
of an armed mob of mutineers and traitors, and to renew
the old alliance with Rome. Syracuse had not rebelled
against Rome, but had implored assistance from Rome
against its worst oppressors. Not only clemency and
magnanimity, but even justice, should have prompted the
conquerors to look upon the sufferings of Syracuse in this
light ; and it would have been the undying glory of Mar-
ceUus— brighter than the most splendid triumph— if, on
obtaining possession, he had shielded the wretched town
from further miseries. He would indeed have acted
right in punishing with Roman severity the soldiers who
had violated the military oath and deserted their colours,
and who were the chief cause of the pertinacity of the
struggle. But he ought to have spared the citizens of the
town, the deplorable victims of hostile factions. He did
the very opposite. He allowed the deserters to escape,
perhaps with the object of being able to plunder so much
the more leisurely, and he treated the town as if it had
been taken by storm, handing it over to the rapaciiy of sol-
diers maddened to fury by the long resistance and by the
IV.
312 . EOMAN HISTORY.
BOOK prospect of plunder and revenge. The noble Syracuse,
which had ranked in the foremost line of the fairest cities
that bore the Hellenic name, fell never to rise again from
that time to the present. Marcellus had indeed promised
that the lives of the people should be spared ; ^ but how
such a promise was kept we may infer from the savage
murder of the best man in Syracuse, whose grey hair
and venerable, thought-furrowed forehead ought to have
shielded him from the steel even of a barbarian. Where
Archimedes was slain, because, absorbed in his studies, he
did not readily understand the demand of a plundering
soldier, there, we may be sure, ignoble blood was shed
without stint.* Marcellus was intent only on obtaining
possession of the royal treasures, which he hoped to find in
the island of Ortygia ; but it is hardly likely that much of
them had been left by the successive masters of Syracuse
during the time of anarchy. On the other hand, the works
of art which had been accumulated in Syracuse during the
periods of prosperity were still extant. These were all,
without exception, taken, to be sent to Rome.' Syracuse waa
not the first town where the Bomans learnt and practised
this kind of public spoliation.* Tarentum and Volsinii
had already experienced the rapacity rather than the
taste of the Romans for works of art. But* the art
' Probably an order was issued to the Koman soldiers forbidding that
indiscriminate butchery of all the inhabitants which usually followed the
storming of a hostile town, according to the detailed and graphic account of
Polybius, X. 39.
« Livy, XXV. 31 : * Cum multa irse, miilta avaritise foeda exempla ederentur/
etc. Zonaras, ix. 5: *EyKpar€is 8i rovrtty ol 'Pwfiaioi y9v6/A9woi 6.KKovs re
iroWohs Kot rhv *Apx^'h^y i,w4Kreivaw.
■ Polybius, ix. 10 : "EKplOri fiky oly 8i3l rovro ro7s *P»/Aa(ois ri r&v ^vpcucowr&w
froKvTfKiarara KaraaKfvAirfiaTa irdpra fierh r^v SXvffiv fiCTcuco/xf^cxy €is r^v
iavr&v irarplSa Ka\ firi^ku iiroXircIy. Cicero indeed says {Verr. ii. 2, 2)
that Marcellus 'spared the conquered enemies,' and not only preserved
Syracuse uninjured, but left it so adorned that it wiu a monument of his
victory and, at the same time, of his clemency. This is not historical evidence,
but a rhetorical artifice by which the orator pressed history into his service
and shaped it according to his wants. Cicero used Marcellus only as a foil
for Verres. His assertion is of no force to contradict Polybius.
* See voL I p. 563.
THE SECOND PUNIC WAR. 318
treasures of Syracuse were so numerous and so splendid CHAP,
that they threw into the shade everything of the sort that ^ , ' ,^
had been transported to Rome before. It came therefore S^f™
to be a received tradition that Marcellus was the first who 212-211
set the example of enriching Bome, at the expense of her
conquered enemies, with the triumphs of Greek art J
Fourth Period of the Hannihalian War.
FBOM THE TAKING OP STEACUSE TO THE CAPTURE OP
CAPUA, 212-211 B.C.
By the taking of Syracuse the war in Sicily was decided Sarrender
in favour of the Eomans, but not by any means finished. LntSiiby
Agrigentum was still held by the Carthaginians, and a Mutines,
great number of Sicilian towns were on their side. A piete sub-
Libyan cavalry general, named Mutines, sent to Sicily by j^S**^^" ^^
Hannibal, and operating in conjunction with Hanno and
Epikydes, gave the Eomans a great deal of trouble. But
when Mutines had quarrelled with the other Carthaginian
generals, and had gone over to the Romans in conse-
quence, the fortune of war inclined more and more to the
side of the latter. At length, two years after the fall of
Syracuse, Mutines betrayed Agrigentum to the Bomans.
The consul, M. Valerius Lsevinus, who then commanded
in Sicily, ordered the leading inhabitants of Agrigentum
to be scourged and beheaded, the rest to be sold as slaves,
and the town to be sacked. This severe punishment had
the eflPect of terrifying the other towns. Forty of them
submitted voluntarily, twenty were betrayed, and only six
had to be taken by force.' All resistance to the Roman
arms in Sicily was now broken, and the island returned to
the peace and slavery of a Roman province. Its principal
task was henceforth to grow corn for feeding the sovereign
' Liyy, xxr. 40 : ' Ceterum inde primum initium mirandi Gnecarum artium
opera, licentiteque huic sacra profanaque omnia Tulgo spoliandi fitctum est.'—
Compare Plntarch (Marcell, 21).
■ LiTy, xxvi. 40.
314
ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK
IV.
Events in
Spain and
Africa.
populace of the capital, and to allow itself to be plundered
systematically by farmers of the revenue, traders, usurers,
and, above all, by the annual governors.
It was most fortunate for Borne that, by the fall of
Syracuse in 212, the Sicilian war had taken a favourable
turn. For the same year was so disastrous to them in
other parts, that the prospect for the future became more
and more gloomy. In Spain the two brothers Scipio had,
after the successful campaign of 215,' continued the war
in the following year with the same happy results.
Several battles are reported for this year, in which they
are said invariably to have beaten the Carthaginians.^
We may safely pass over the detailed accounts of these
events, which are of no historical value, from their evident
air of exaggeration, and on account of our ignorance of
the ancient geography of Spain. Yet, through all mis-
representations, it appeaxs certain that the war was con-
tinued in Spain, and that the Carthaginians were not able
to carry out Hannibal's plan of sending an army across
the Pyrenees and Alps to co-operate with the army already
in Italy. How much of this result is due to the genius of
the Boman generals and to the bravery of the Boman
legions it is impossible to ascertain from the partial
accounts of the annalists, who probably derived their in-
formation chiefly from the traditions of the Scipionic
» See p. 268.
* We cannot read Livy*8 report withont the conviction that a great portion
of it rests on fiction or exaggeration. (See p. 275, note 1 ; and Arnold, IRat,
of Bome, vi. 260-263). The first alleged victory at Illitnrgi (Livy, xxiv. 49)
is evidently a repetition of the victory related before (Livy, xxiii. 18), and
placed in the preceding year : the circumstances are precisely the same ; the
difference lies only in the number of the slain, of prisoners and military
finsigns taken. In the battle of Munda which now follows, Cn. Scipio is
wounded, and thus the Carthaginians are saved from a defeat, but lose, never-
theless, 12,000 dead, 3,000 prisoners, and 57 military ensigns. In a third
battle, at Auringis, they lose about half as many, ' because,' as Livy (ibid. 42)
adds in explanation, 'there were fewer left to fight' Thereupon they are
beaten a fourth time, with a loss of 8,000 dead, 1,000 prisoners, 58 ensigns, and
XI elephants. If we add up tlia numbers given by Livy, the OarthaginiAns
lost in the two years 215 and 214, in Spain, not less than 80,000 men. The
magnificence of such boasting is apt to inspire admiration.
THE SECOND PUNIC WAR.
815
family. One cause of tlie failure of the Carthaginians
lay no doubt in the frequent rebellions among the Spanish
tribes, which the Romans instigated and turned to their
own advantage. But the principal cause was a war in Africa
with Syphax, a Numidian chief or king, which seems to
have been very serious, and which compelled them to with-
draw Hasdrubal and a part of their army from Spain for
the defence of their home territory.* This circumstance
operated most powerfully in favour of the Roman arms in
Spain, leaving the Scipios almost unopposed, and enabKng
them to overrun the Cai'thaginian possessions, and to
obtain a footing south of the river Ebro.^ In the year
214, the Romans took Saguntum, and restored it as au
independent allied town five years after its capture by
Hannibal.' They also entered into relations with Kin«j
Syphax. Every enemy of Carthage was of course an ally
of Rome, and valuable in proportion as he was troublesome
or dangerous to Carthage. Roman officers were dispatched,
into Africa to train the undisciplined soldiers of the
Numidian prince, and especially to form an infantry, after
the Roman model, which might be capable of resisting
the Carthaginians in the field. Such a task as this, how-
ever, would have required more time than the Roman
officers coidd devote to it. It seems that Syphax derived
no benefit from the attempt to turn his irregular horsemen
into legionary soldiers. He was soon after in gr^at diffi-
culties. The Carthaginians secured the alliance of another
Numidian chief, called Gula, whose son Masinissa, a youth
seventeen years old, gave now the first evidence of a
* Appian, vi, 15: Kai imh rouSt (the year 217) ol Zio JiKiitiwifts rhp iy
*lBiilpi<f. 'k6K9iio¥ 9t4<f>tpoy, *A(r9pov$ou tr^laiv hfrurrparrfyovvros fn^XP^ KapxiiZ^yiot
li\v bTch ^Z6i^QKos rov r&v Nofui8»y Zwdtrrov woXtftoifiepot rhy *AirZpo^^ay Kal
IJL4pos rris ovtov ffrpartas fiertviixi^airro. r&y 8i &wof>jol-ruy ol SfCivfcwef ^hi^ap&s
iKpdrow, (Livj, zxiv. 48). Appi&n altogether passes orer the battle of
Ibera. See p. 268.
* LiTy, xxiv. 48.
* Livy (xxiv. 42) states erroneously that Sagnntum was seven years in the
hands of the Carthaginians. The capture and the restoration of the town to
the old inhabitants indirectly shows that it could not have been totally
destroyed by Hannibal in 219, as LiTy*8 description would lead us to believe.
CHAP.
VIII.
1 — "
TOUBTH
Period,
212-211
B.O.
316
ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK
JV.
"Employ-
ment of
mercena-
ries in
Spain.
Defeat and
death of
the SeipioB.
militarj ability and an ambition destined in the sequel
to become most fataFto the Carthaginians. Syphax was
completely defpated and expelled from his dominions. He
came to the Bomans as a fugitive about the same time
that Hasdmbal, after the victorious termination of the
African war, returned to Spain with considerable reinforce-
ments.
The fortune of war now changed rapidly and deci-
dedly. The Scipios, having long been left without a supply
of new troops from home, had been obliged to enrol a
great number of Spanish mercenaries. Bome now learnt to
know the diflFerence between mercenaries and an army of
citizens.^ It was not indeed the first time that such
troops had been employed. In the first Punic war a body
of Gallic deserters had been taken into Roman pay.' The
Cenomanians and other tribes of Cisalpine Gaul, mentioned
as serving on the Roman side in the beginning of the
Hannibalian war, were no doubt regularly paid, and were,
in fact, mercenaries. So were of course the Cretans and
other Greek troops whom Hiero had sent as auxiliary
contingents on several occasions.' But it appears that
the first employment of mercenaries on a large scale, after
the model of the Carthaginians, took place in Spain on
the present occasion. Where the Scipios obtained the
means for paying these troops we cannot tell. Perhaps
they were not able to pay them punctually, and this
fact would alone sufiice to explain their faitUessness and
desertion.
It was in 21 2 B.C. that Hasdrubal, the son of Barcas,
after the defeat of Syphax, returned to Spain. He found
that the Roman generals had divided their forces, and
were operating separately in diflFerent parts of the country.
Their Celtiberian mercenaries had deserted and gone
> The defeat of On. Scipio BUggeeta to Livy (xxr. 33) the following remark :
' Id quidem cavendnm semper Romanis ducibas erit, exemplaque hsec rer^ pro
docamentie habenda, ne ita extemis credant auxiliie, nt non pins sui loboris
tfuarumque proprie ririum in castris habeant.'
* See aboTe, p. 102. ' See above, pp. 200, 226.
THE SECOND PUNIC WAR.
817
home, tempted, it is said, by their countrymen who served
in the Carthaginian army. Thus, weakened by desertion
and by the division of their strength, the two Scipios were
one after another attacked by Hasdrubal, and so thoroughly
routed that hardly a remnant of their army escaped.*
Publius Cornelius Scipio and his brother Cneius both fell
at the head of their troops. A poor remnant was saved,
and made good its retreat under the command of a brave
officer of equestrian rank, called L. Marcius.^ But almost
CHAP.
VIII.
FOUBTH
Pkbiud,
212-211
B.C.
* It 1*8 difficult to decide whether the defeat of the Scipios took place in 212
or iu 211, as Livy contradicts himself. The argumeots in favour of the year
211 are stAied by U. Becker, Vorarbeiten zur Geschichte des zweiten punischen
Krieffes, p. 1 ? 3.
' Livy, XXV. 82-40. The exploits of this Marcius were the subject of the
most impudent and barefaced exaggerations. It was, as we know from
numerous examples, a practice of the Koman annalists to make it appear that
every Roman defeat was compensated in a signal manner by some glorious
victory. This disingenuous vanity is nowhere more apparent than in the
boastful report of the doings of L. Marcius. Whilst Appian (vi. 17) says
that Marcius (whom he erroneously calls Marcellus) accomplished so little
tbit the Romans were expelled from almost the whole of Spain and shut up
in a small district among the Pyrenees, the annalist Piso — according to Livy
(xxv. 39) — reported that Marcius turned round upon the pursuing army under
Mugo, and killed 5,000 of the enemy. Valerius Antias was not satisfied with
this result. According to him, Marcius attacked and took Mago's camp, killed
7,000 Carthaginians, then fought a battle with Hasdrubal, killed 10,000, and
took 4,730 prisoners. But the lies of Valerius Antias are modest iu com-
parison with those of another annalist, called Acilius, whose report contained
the raw materials for Livy's elaborate description. The number of slain
Carthaginians, which was at first 5,000, then 7,000 and 10,000, is swelled
here to 37,000 (in the account of Valerius Maximus (i. 6, 2) even to 38,000,
but what is a trifie of 1,000 men more or less ?) and two Carthaginian camps
are stormed in succession. Such victories, gained by the flying remnants of a
routed army, belong seemingly to the regions of the miraculous; but we
actually meet also with a genuine miracle, for, according to Valerius Antias —
quoted by Pliny (Hut. Nat. ii. Ill) and Livy (xxv. 39) — the head of Marcius,
when he addressed his soldiers, was surrounded by a halo. Reading such
reports as these, we can fancy that we are still in the time of the Samnite
wars. But distance of locality lends almost as much freedom to the story-
teller as distance of time. Spain, as we have already noticed (p. 314, note 2),
was a fruitful soil for fiction. After this, we bcH^ome very sceptical about the
genuineness of a silver shield of 137 pounds weight, containing a portrait of
Hasdrubal, which is said to have been preserved in the Capitol till the great
cojiflagration, 84 b.c. (Livy, loc. cit. Pliny, Hist. Nat. xxxv. 4). If such a
shield existed, could it have come from Spain on the occasion of the imaginaiy
victories of Marcius ?
318 R03IAN HISTORY.
BOOK the whole of Spain was lost to the Romans at one blow.
IV
^ — * The war which they had vigorously and saccessfully
carried on for so many yearcf, for the purpose of pre-
venting a second invasion of Italy from Spain, had ended
now with the annihilation of almost all their forces, and
nothing seemed henceforth able to check the Carthaginian
general, if he intended to carry out the plan of his
brother.
Opprations The disastrous issue of the war in Spain was the more
bai in ' alarming as in the year 212 Hannibal again displayed in
southeni Italy an energy which vras calculated to remind the
Romans of his first three campaigns after he had crossed
the Alps in 218. The year 213 had passed almost as
quietly as if a truce had been concluded. Hannibal had
spent the summer in the country of the Sallentinians, not
far from Tarentum, in the hope of taking by surprise or
by treason that city, which was of the greatest importance
to him from the facilities which it aflForded for direct
communication with Macedonia. He obtained possession
of several small towns in the neighbotu*hood ; but, on the
other hand, he lost again Consentia and Taurianum in
Bruttium, while a few insignificant places in Lucania were
taken by the consul Tiberius Sempronius Gracchus.* On
this occasion we learn incidentally that Borne allowed at
that time, or rather encouraged, a kind of guerilla warfare
of volunteers, not unlike privateering in naval wars, which
must have contributed largely to brutalize the population.
A certain Roman knight and contractor, called T. Pom-
ponius Veientanus, commanded a body of irregulars in
Bruttium, pillaging and devastating those communities
which had joined the Carthaginian side. He was joined
by a lai^e number of runaway slaves, herdsmen, and
peasants, and he had formed something like an army,
which, without costing the republic anything, did good
service in damaging and harassing her enemies. But this
mob was not fit to encounter a Carthaginian army, and it
' Livy, xxy. 1.
THE SECOND PUNIC WAR. 819
was accordingly an easy task for Hanno, who commanded CHAP,
in these parts, to capture or cut to pieces the whole band. -_ , '.-
Pomponius was taken prisoner, and it was perhaps |«^^™
fortunate for him that he thus escaped the vengeance of 212-211
his countrymen, whose curses he had richly deserved, not **^'
only by his incompetence as an officer, but much more
by the rascality with which he, in conjunction with other
contractors, had robbed the public and jeopardized the
safety of the state.
It now became evident that the apparently self-denying Dishonesty
patriotism of which, two years before, several large capital- coiSw-*°
ists had made an ostentatious display, was nothing but a ton.
cover for the meanest rapacity, selfishness, and dishonesty.
The ungovernable craving for wealth which at all times
possessed the great men of Rome, joined with their utter
contempt of right — the two great evils which the Gracchi
in vain endeavoured to check — show themselves for the
first time with great distinctness in the trial of the con-
tractor M. Postumius Pyrgensis and his fellow-conspirators
in the beginning of the year 212 b.o.
This Postumius, like the just-mentioned Pomponius, Trial of M.
was a member of a joint-stock company, which in 215 had pm^^^
oflFered to furnish, on credit, the materials of war necessary
for the army in Spain, on condition that the government
should insure them against sea risks.' Since then the
pretended patriots had been discovered to be common
rogues and villains. They had laden old vessels with
worthless articles, had scuttled and abandoned them at
sea, and then claimed compensation for the alleged full
value. This act was not merely an ordinary fraud on the
public purse, but a crime of the gravest nature, inasmuch
as it endangered the safeiy of the army in Spain. In-
formation of it had been given as early as the year 213;
but, as Livy* assures us, the senate did not venture at
once to proceed against the men whose wealth gave them
> See p. 288.
• Livy, XXV, 8 : * quia patres oidinem publicanorum in tali tempore offensum
nolebant/
320
BOMAN HISTOEY.
BOOK an overpowering influence in the state. Pomponius
*- r^ — ' accordingly remained not only unpunished, but was even
appointed to a sort of military command, and allowed to
carry on a predatory war on his own account and for his
own profit. We can easily understand that men of such,
reckless audacity and so unprincipled as Pomponius, who
commanded bands of armed ruffians, could not easily be
punished like common oflFenders. Yet after Pomponius
had fallen into captivity, and his band was annihilated,
the government plucked up courage to call his accomplices
to account for their misdeeds. Two tribunes of the people,
Spurius Carvilius and Lucius Carvilius, impeached Pos-
tumius before the assembly of tribes. The people were
highly incensed. Nobody ventured to plead in favour of
the accused ; even the tribune C. Servilius Casca, a relative
of Postumius, was kept by fear and shame from interceding.
The accused now ventured upon an act which seems
almost incredible, and which shows to what an extent, even
at the best time of the republic, the internal order and
the public peace were at the mercy of any band of de-
sperate villains who ventured to set the law at defiance.
The Capitol, where the tribes were just about to give their
votes, was invaded by a mob, which created such an uproar
that acts of violence would have been committed if the
tribunes, yielding to the storm, had not broken up the
assembly.
Condem- This triumph of lawlessness over the established order
Postumius ^f *^® state was a temporary success which carried the
and his anarchical party beyond their real strength. Bome was
plices. not yet so degenerate that a permanent terrorism could
be established by the audacity of some rich and influential
malefactors. It was rather an outbreak of madness than
a deliberate act which prompted Postumius and his ac-
complices to resist the authority of the Roman people and
its lawful magistrates. They were far from forming a
political party, or from finding men in the senate or in
the popular assembly who would venture to defend or even
to excuse them. Their vile frauds were now a small
THE SECOND PUNIC WAR. 321
offence compared with their attempt to outrage the chap.
majesty of the Eoman people. The tribunes dropped the - ^' .-
minor charge, and, instead of asking the people to inflict a ^o^^™
fine, insisted upon a capital punishment. Fostumius for* 212-211
feited his baU, and escaped from Itome. The punishment "'^*
of exile was formally pronounced against him, and all
his property was confiscated. All participators in the
outrage were punished with the same severity, and thus
the offended majesty of the Boman people was fiilly and
promptly vindicated.^
The villany of the Soman publicani, who abused the Roman
necessities of the state to enrich themselves, and whose ®*^'°v^
^ moralitj.
criminal rapacity endangered the safety of the troops in
Spain, is not without parallels in history, and has been
equalled or surpassed in modem Europe, as well as in
America during the late civil war. We must not, there-
fore, be too harsh in our judgment, or too sweeping in our
condemnation of the Soman people among whom such
swindlers could prosper. But we shall do well to remem-
ber infamous acts like these, when we hear the fulsome
praise often lavished on the civic virtue, the self-denial,
and the devotion of the Itoman people in the service of
the state. The moral and religious elements of the com-
munity must have been deeply tainted if, in the very midst
of the HannibaUan war, in the agonizing struggle for exis-
tence, a great number of men could be found among the
influential classes so utterly void of patriotic feeling and
conscientiousness, so hardened against public indignation,
so careless of just retribution.
Not only public morality, but also the religion of the Growth of
Romans, felt the injurious effect of the protracted war. superaii-
It seemed that men gradually lost confldence in their Rome,
native gods. All the prayers, vows, processions, sacrifices,
and offerings, all the festivals and sacred games which
had been celebrated on the direct injunction of the priests,
had proved to be of no avail. Either the ancestral gods
* liyy, XXV. 4.
VOL. II. T
322 ' KOMAN HISTORY.
BOOK had forsaken the town, or they were powerless against
^ — r^ — ' the decrees of fate. In their despair the people turned
towards strange gods. The number of the superstitious
was swelled by a mass of impoverished peasants, who had
left their wasted fields and burnt homesteads to find
support and protection in the capital.^ The streets
swarmed with foreign priests, soothsayers, and religious
impostors, who no longer secretly, but openly, carried on
their trade, and profited by the fear and ignorance of the
multitude. Such a neglect of the national religion was,
in the eyes of every community in the ancient world, a
kind of treason, which, if tolerated, would have brought
about the most fatal consequences. No nation of antiquity
rose to the conception of a God common to the human
race. Every people, every political society, had its own
special protecting deity, distinct from the deity of the
next neighbour and hostile to the gods of the national
enemy. It was of the utmost importance that all citizens
should combine in duly worshipping those powers who, in
consideration of uninterrupted worship, vouchsafed to grant
their protection, and who were jealous of the admission
of foreign rivals- It was therefore a sure sign of national
decay if a people began to lose confidence in their own
paternal religion, and turned hopefuUy to the gods of their
neighbours. The Roman government began to be alarmed.
The senate commissioned the magistrates to interfere.
Not the priests or pontifices, who might be expected to be
more directly concerned in upholding the purity of religion,
but a civil magistrate — the prsetor — caused the town to be
cleared of all the foreign rituals, prayers, and oracles*; and
it appears that the people submitted to this interference
as to a legitimate exercise of civil authority, just as they
submitted to the burdens of the war.
Levying of The condemnation of Postumius took place in the
beginning of the year 212, about the time of the consular
elections, which placed Quintus Tulvius Flaccus and
' Livj, XXV. 1.
new
legions.
THE SECOND PUNIC WAR. 823
Appius Claudius Pulcher at the head of the goyenunent. CHAP.
Great difficulties had now been regularly experienced for v- — , -^
some time past in the conscription of recruits for the army, f!^^^™
The number of twenty-three legions was, however, completed 21 2-21 1
for the impending campaign,^ and even this enormous force
proved by no means too large. In spite of the taking of
Syracuse, the year 212 was destined to be one of the most
disastrous for the Romans in the whole course of the war.
The first calamity was the loss of Tarentum, which took Snnender
place even before the opening of the campaign. The t^^**'
Itomans had been themselves the cause of it through their HanniUl.
short-sighted cruelty. A number of hostages of Tarentum
and Thurii, detained at Bome, had made an attempt to
escape, but were seized at Terracina, brought back to
Bome, and tortured to death as traitors. By this act the
Bomans had themselves cut the bonds which had thus far
held the Tarentines in their allegiance. It was a pro-
ceeding intended to inspire terror, like the massacre of
Enna ; but, like this, it produced the opposite effect, by en-
gendering only a feeling of revenge and implacable hatred.
A conspiracy was immediately formed at Tarentum for
betrajring the town to Hannibal. Nikon and Philodemos, the
chiefs of the conspirators, under the pretence of going out
on hunting expeditions, found means of seeing Hannibal,
who still tarried in the neighbourhood of Tarentum ;
they concluded a formal treaty with him, stipulated that
their town should be free and independent, and that the
house of no Tarentine citizen should be plundered by the
Carthaginian troops. The situation of Tarentum is known
from the history of the first war with Rome.* On the
eastern side of the town, where the narrow peninsula on
which it lay was joined to the mainland, a large open
space within the walls formed the public burial-ground.
In this lonely place Nikon and some of his fellow-con-
spirators hid themselves on a night previously fixed upon,
and waited for a fire signal, which Hannibal had promised
» Livy, xanr. 3, 6. * See toI. 1. p. 486.
T 2
324 ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK to give as soon as he had readied the neighbourhood. When
they saw the signal they fell upon the guards at a gate, cut
down the Roman soldiers, and admitted a troop of Gauls
and Numidians into the town. At the same moment Philo-
demos, pretending to return from hunting, presented him-
self before the postern of another gate, whose guards had
been accustomed, for some time past, to open when they
heard his whistle. Two men who were with him carried a
huge boar. The guard, whilst admiring and feeling the
animal, was instantly pierced by the spear of Philodemos.
About thirty men were ready outside. They entered by the
postern-gate, killed the other guards, opened the main
gates, and admitted a whole column of Libyans, who
advanced in regular order, under the guidance of the
conspirators, towards the market-place. On both points
the enterprise had succeeded, and the empty space be-
tween the walls and the town was soon filled with Han-
nibal's soldiers. The Roman garrison had not received
the slightest warning. The commanding officer, M. Livius
Macatus, an indolent, self-indulgent man, had been
spending the evening in revelry, and was in his bed,
overpowered with wine and sleep, when the stillness
of the night was broken by the noise of arms and by a
strange sound of Roman trumpets. The conspirators had
procured some of these trumpets, and, although they blew
them very unskilfully, they yet succeeded in drawing the
Roman soldiers, who were quartered in all parts of the
town, into the streets just as Hannibal was advancing in
three columns. Thus a great number of Romans were cut
down in the first confusion and disorder, without being
able to make any resistance, and almost without knowing
what the tumult was all about. A few reached the
citadel, and among them was the commander Livius, who
at the first alarm had rushed to the harbour and succeeded
in jumping into a boat.
Proclama- When the morning dawned, the whole of Tarentum,
Hainfbal ^^^^ ^^® exception of the citadel, was in Hannibal's hands.
to the He caused the Tarentines to be called to an assembly, and
Tarentines. ^
^m
THE SECOND PUNIC WAR. 325
made known to them that they had nothingr to fear for CHAP.
VIII
themselves and their families ; on the contrary, that he -_ , ' ^
had come to deliver them from the Eoman yoke. Only p°^fj^
the houses and the property of the Bomans were given np 212-211
to plimder. Every house marked as the property of a
citizen of Tarentum was to be spared; but those who
made a false statement were threatened with capital
punishment Probably the Eomans were quartered in
houses of their own, or in houses of men who were
partisans of Bome. The latter were now made to suffer
for their attachment to Eome, which was a crime in the
eyes of their political opponents.
The citadel of Tarentum being situated on a hill Siege o^
of small elevation at the western extremity of the of Taren^
tongue of land occupied by the town, could only be ^™-
taken by a regular siege, and such a siege was hopeless
without the co-operation of the fleet. In order, therefore,
to secure the town in the meantime from any attacks of
the Eoman garrison, Hannibal caused a line of defences,
consisting of a ditch, mound, and wall, to be made
between the citadel and the town. The Eomans attempted
to inteiTupt the work. Hannibal encouraged them by a
simulated flight of his men, and when he had drawn them
far enough into the town, attacked them from all sides,
and drove them back into the citadel with great slaughter.
The Eoman garrison was now so much reduced that
Hannibal hoped to be able to take the citadel by force,
and he prepared a regular assault by erecting the necessary
machines. But the Eomans, reinforced by the garrison
of Metapontum, sallied forth in the night, and destroying
Hannibal's siege-works, compelled him to desist from his
enterprise. Thus the citadel of Tarentum remained in
the possession of the Eomans ; and as it commanded the
entrance to the harbour, the ships of the Tarentines
would have been locked up, if Hannibal had not contrived
to drag them across the tongue of land on which the town
lay, right through the streets running from the inner
harbour to the open sea. The Tarentine fleet was now
326 EOMAN HISTORY.
BOOK able to blockade the citadel, whilst a wall and ditch closed
IV
^, , '_^ up the land side. The possession of the citadel was
of the greatest importance to both belligerents. The
Bomans therefore made strenuoius efforts to defend it.
They dispatched the prsetor P. Cornelius with a few
ships laden with com for the supply of the garrison, and
Cornelius, evading the vigilance of the blockading squadron,
succeeded in reaching his destination. Thus Hannibal's
hope of reducing the fortress by famine was deferred, and
the Tarentines could do no more than watch the Itoman
garrison and keep it in check.
Alliance of The example of Tarentum was soon followed by
Greek Metapontum — ^from which the Boman garrison had been
CTties with withdrawn — by Thurii— out of revenge for the murdered
hostages — and by Heraclea.' Thus the Bomans lost by
their own fault these Greek towns, which had remained
faithful to them for so many years after the battle of
Cannse. The only towns that stood out against Carthage
were Bhegium and Elea (Velia), with Posidonia or
Psestum — ^which in 268 had become a Boman colonv — and
Neapolis in Campania.^ Hannibal had reason to be
satisfied with the first results of the campaign of 212.
Leaving a small garrison in Tarentum, he now turned
northwards.
Roman Three years had passed since Capua had revolted to the
designs ,
against Carthaginians. Bome had succeeded in preventing the
Capua, other larger towns of Campania from following her ex-
ample. Nola, Neapolis, Cumse, Puteoli had remained faith-
ful and were safe ; Casilinum had been retaken ; and Capua
was hemmed in on all sides, partly by these towns, partly
by fortified Boman camps. The time was approaching
when the attempt could be made to retake Capua. This
was now the principal aim of the Bomans in Italy, and
the defection of the Greek towns, so far from inducing
them to give up this plan, contributed rather to confirm
them in it. If Capua could be re-conquered and severely
* Appian, vii. 36. * Livy, xxri. 39.
THE SECOND PUNIC WAR. 827
punished, they might hope to put an end to all further CHAP,
attempts at revolt on the part of their allies, and they >_..,„-l^
would have destroyed the prestige of Hannibal and the |'ou»™
confidence which the Italians might be tempted to place 212-211
in the power and protection of Carthage. ^'^'
Since their defection the Capuans had had little cause Condition
to approve the bold step which they had taken and to <>^^*P^-
rejoice over the results. K at any time they had really
entertained the hope of obtaining the dominion over Italy
in the place of Borne, they were soon disabused of so vain
a notion. They had not been able even to subject the
towns of Campania, or to induce them to enter into the
alliance of Carthage, and as, in consequence of their own
defection, Campania had become the principal theatre of
war, they saw themselves exposed to the unremitting
attacks of the Romans. Whenever Hannibal left Cam-
pania, the Boman armies approached the town from all
sides, returning immediately into their strong positions
as soon as Hannibal drew near. Such a war as this, while
it drained the resources of the country, and interfered with
the regular tillage of the land and the commercial inter-
course with her neighbours, could not fail soon to reduce
to distress a tov^n whose wealth consisted chiefly in the
produce of her fruitful soil. People began to repent the
step which they had taken. There had always been a
Boman party at Capua. With the continued pressure of
the war, which this party had endeavoured to prevent, the
split among the Capuan citizens became wider every day.
As early as the year 213 we hear of a body of one hundred
and twelve Capuan horsemen deserting to the Bomans
with all their arms and accoutrements.^ Moreover the
three hundred horsemen who had been serving in Sicily
at the time of the revolt of their native town, and who
were looked upon in the light of hostages, abjured tjieir
allegiance to the revolutionary government of Capua, and
were admitted as Boman citizens to the ftdl franchise.
* Idvy, xxiv. 47.
328 ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK Even if the Carthaginian garrison was not found irksome
IV.
and onerous to the people of Capua, it was natural that a
revulsion of feeling should take place among them.
Request of j^ the beginning of the year 212 the Capuans perceived
puans to that the Romans were about to draw the net round them.
for°u^-*^ As the populous town was not supplied with provisions to
plies. resist a long siege, they sent in all haste to Hannibal, who
was at that time in the neighbourhood of Tarentum, and
conjured him to come to their aid. In truth Hannibal's
task was not easy. Being stationed at one extremity of
the hostile country, and fuUy occupied in the enterprise
against a strong and important city ; having to bestow his
constant attention to the feeding and recruiting of his army;
called upon to defend a number of allies, more trouble-
some than useful to him ; obliged, moreover, to survey and
conduct the whole war in Italy, Spain, and Sicily, to advise
the home government, to urge on the tardy resolutions
of his ally the king of Macedonia — he was now required
to provide for the victualling of Capua. The supplies
with which this could be eflfected he was not able to send
for from Africa, and to direct by a safe and easy road to
the threatened town. They had to be collected in Italy
by violence, or by the good services of exhausted allies ;
and, being collected, they had to be conveyed by land, on
bad and difficult roads, past hostile armies and fortresses.
Capture of In Spite of all these difficulties, if Hannibal had been
voys^op ^^^® personally to undertake this task, it would have suc-
Capua by ceeded without any doubt, for wherever he appeared the
Bomans slunk back into their hiding-places. But he was
not able to leave Tarentum, and therefore intrusted the
victualling of Capua to Hanno, who commanded in Brut-
tium« Hanno too was an able general. He collected the
supplies in the neighbourhood of Beneventum, and if the
Capuans had equalled him in energy and dispatch, and
had furnished means of transport in sufficient quantity
and in proper time, the hard problem would have been
solved before any Roman force would have had time to
interfere. But, owing to the remissness of the Capuans,
the Ro-
mans.
THE SECOND PUNIC WAR. 829
a delay took place. The Roman colonists of Beneventum CHAP,
informed the consul Q. Fulvius Flaccus, at Bovianum, that . ^™' .
large supplies were being brought together near their town. Fourth
Fulvius hastened to the spot, and, during the temporary 212-211
absence of Hanno, attacked the camp, filled and encum- ®•^■
bered with 2,000 waggons, an immense train of cattle and
a great number of drivers and other non-combatants. The
whole convoy was taken.' We are not informed if Han-
nibal succeeded afterwards in repairing this loss and in
sending the necessary supplies to Capua. But this seems
highly probable, as otherwise we could hardly explain the
long duration of the siege. Moreover Hannibal himself
appeared soon after in Campania, and entered Capua ; so
that if he brought a new supply of provisions, the Romans
at any rate were not able to intercept it a second time.
He had sent a body of 2,000 horse in advance, who fell
upon and routed the Romans with great loss as they
were engaged in ravaging, according to their custom, the
neighbourhood of Capua.^ When Hannibal appeared him-
self and offered battle,' the two consuls, Fulvius Flaccus
and Appius Claudius, instead of proceeding with the siege
of Capua, retired hastily, the one to Cumse, the other
into Lucania. Capua this time was delivered, and Han-
nibal was at leisure to turn southwards once more.
Since the campaign of 215 B.C., Tiberius Sempronius Defeat and
Gracchus had, with his army of liberated slaves, commanded g^^^j^
in Lucania, and had been on the whole successful. A nius .«
portion of the Lucanians had remained faithful to Rome.
These and the slave legions carried on a kind of civil war
against the revolted Lucanians. The Roman general was
now doomed to experience the faithlessness of the Luca-
nian national character, to which King Alexander of
' Livy, XXV. 14.
* Livy (xxT. 18) confesses a loss of 1,500 men.
^ Liyy (xxy. 19) relates that the two armies were actually engaged, but that
the battle was soon after broken o£f on both sides, because during the engage-
ment a body of Boman cavalry appeared in the distance, and was mistaken by
Hannibal, as well as by the Romans, for a reinforcement of the enemy. If this
report is true, it seems strange that the Romans did not accept battle afterwards,
when they found out their error.
Gracchus.
330
ROMAN mSTORY.
BOOK
IV.
Total
defeat of
Fulvius in
Apulia.
Relative
position of
Hannibal
and the
Romana.
Epirus had fallen a victim.^ He was drawn into an am-
bush bj a Lucanian of the Roman party, and cut down.
His army was dissolved at his death. The slaves, liberated
by him, did not consider themselves bound to obey any-
other leader, and dispersed immediately. The cavalry-
alone remained, under the qusestor Cn. Cornelius. It
seems, however, that some slaves were collected again by
the centurion M. Centenius, whom the senate had sent
into Lucania with 8,000 men, in order to carry on a war
of rapine against the revolted Lucanians, as Pomponius
had done in Bruttium. This Centenius had almost
doubled his army by collecting volunteers, when — ^unfor-
tunately for him — he encountered Hannibal, and was so
utterly defeated in this unequal contest that hardly one
thousand of his men escaped.
Afber this easy victory, Hannibal hastened into Apulia,
where the praetor Cneius Fulvius, the consul's brother,
commanded two legions. At Herdonea Fulvius ventured,
or was compelled, to offer battle to the dreaded Punian,
and paid for his rashness by the loss of his army and
camp. Livy reports that no more than 2,000 men escaped
out of 18,000.* It was a victory which resembled the
days of the Trebia, the Thrasymenus, and the Aufidus, and
Bome witnessed again such scenes of consternation and
terror as had followed those great national disasters.
Thus had Hannibal in the course of the year 212 made
himself again terrible to the Bomans, in a manner which
could hardly be expected after his comparative inactivity
during the last three years. He had taken Tarentum,
destroyed two Boman armies, and dispersed a third. Apulia
and Lucania were cleared of Boman troops; the Greek
cities south of Naples, with the exception of Bhegium and
Velia, were held by the Carthaginians. The weight of
these disasters was increased by the defeat and death of
the two Scipios in Spain, and the loss of all the terri-
tory and the advantages which had been gained in five
1 See Tol. i. p. 380.
• Livy, XXV. 21.
THE SECOND PUNIC WAR. 831
campaigns. In Sicily tlie war continued, even after the fall CHAP,
of Syracuse ; and the Carthaginians, or their allies, were
in possession of a great portion of the island. Borne was f ^^^
nearly exhaiusted, and yet the demands made upon the 212-211
people went on increasing year after year. The govern- ^'^'
ment found it more and more difficult to raise money for
the public treasury and men for the legions. Nor was it
the material resources alone that began to fail. Ah*eady
many thousands of citizens of the military age had evaded
the service, and it had become necessary to proceed
against them with the utmost severity and to press them
into the legions. The villany of the army purveyors
exposed the troops to want and privations. One hope after
another seemed to vanish ; every resource appeared to fail
at last ; and not a single great man had as yet appeared,
whom the struggling republic might oppose as a worthy
antagonist to Hannibal. The Roman generals rose nowhere
above mediocrity, and not one of them had been inspired
by genius to venture beyond the beaten paths of routine.
Nevertheless the Eoman people did not despair. They Resolution
continued the struggle without a thought of yielding, of ^^^
reconciliation, or of peace. Every sentiment was repressed people,
which was not a spur to perseverance and which did not
intensify the power of resistance. All the pleasures of
life, and aU possessiona, to which Soman hearts clung so
tenaciously, were cheerfully sacrificed for the public weal.
The bonds of family, of friendship, of social circles were
severed at the call of duty. All thoughts, wishes, and
actions of the nation tended to one common end — the
overthrow of the national enemy ; and it was this unani-
mity, this perseverance, which secured a final triumph.
No sooner had Hannibal left Campania, and marched Siege of
southwards, than the Roman armies returned to their
former position before Capua. The two consuls, Appius
Claudius Pulcher and Q. Fulvius Tlaccus, each with two
legions, and the prsetor C. Claudius Nero, with an equal
force, advanced from three different points towards the
doomed town, and began to surround it with a double line
332 ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK of circumvallation, consistincr each of a continuous ditch
IV ...
— . ' ' and mound. The inner and smaller circle was intended
to keep the besieged within their walls ; the outer line
was a defence against any army that might come to the
relief of the town. In the space between the two concen-
tric circles, camps were erected for an army of 60,000
men. It was not the intention of the Eomans to take the
town by storm. They relied on the slow but sure effects
of hunger, which, in spite of any amotmt of collected pro-
visions, could not fail to make itself soon felt in a populous
town completely cut off from without. The wants of the
besieging army were amply provided for. The chief
magazine was established in the important town of Casi-
linum on the Voltumus. At the mouth of this river a
fort had been erected, and to this place, as well as to the
neighbouring town of Puteoli, provisions were sent by
sea from Etruria and Sardinia, to be forwarded on the
Voltumus to Casilinum. The several towns of Campania
in the possession of the Eomans served as outposts and
defences to the besieging army, while the communication
with Rome was open by the Appian as well as by the
Latin road.
Resistance Tor a time the Capuans endeavoured to interrupt the
Capuans. work of circumvallation by desperate sallies. The narrow
space of a few thousand paces between the walls of the
town and the Roman lines became the theatre of numerous
engagements, in which, above all, the excellent Gapuan
cavalry maintained its reputation. But the girdle around
the town became from day to day firmer, and the besieged
began anxiously to look out upon the heights of the hill of
Tifata, where Hannibal had repeatedly pitched his camp,
and whence he had but recently pounced upon the
Romans, to scatter them in aU directions. But Hannibal
did not come. After the destruction of the army of M.
Centenius in Lucania, and of On. Fulvius in Apulia, he
had quickly marched upon Tarentum in the hope of sur-
prising the citadel, and, baffled in this enterprise, he had
turned, in the same hope, to Brundusium. Here also he
THE SECOND PUNIC WAR. 333
found the Boman garrison warned and prepared, and he CHAP,
now led his overworked troops into winter- quarters. To
the Capuans lie sent word not to lose courage, promising f^^h
that he would come to their rescue in the right season, 212-211
and put an end to the siege as he had done once before.* ^'^'
But this time the danger was more serious, and the Internal
Romans felt sure of final success. The lines of circum- Qf°capua.
yallation were drawn nearly all round Capua. Before
they were quite complete the Eoman senate made a last
oflfer to the besieged, promising personal freedom and the
preservation of all their property to those who should
leave the town before the Ides of March (at that period
about mid-winter). The Capuans rejected this offer con-
temptuously. They were confident of the help that
Hannibal had promised ; their strength was sufficient to
withstand any attack, and the town was apparently well
supplied with provisions. There were of course friends of
peace and friends of the Romans in Capua, but we can
easily understand that they could hardly venture, under
the present circumstances, to make tiieir wishes known,
and thus to incur the suspicion of cowardice or treason.
The government was in the hands of the democratic party,
hostile to Rome, and it was supported in its policy of
unwavering resistance by the Carthaginian garrison. A
man of low birth, called Seppius Lcesius, discharged the
chief office of Meddix Tuticus,* and it is probable that
the condition of Capua was much like that of Syracuse
during the Roman siege. The men in possession of the
government were too much compromised to hope for
safety from any reconciliation with Rome ; they had
staked their lives on the great game, and were determined
to persevere to the last.
Meanwhile the consuls of the year 211, Cn. Fulvius Attempts
Centumalus and P. Sulpicius Galba,' had entered on their ^1^°^!.'
office. They were apparently men of no great considera- Heve
tion, and the consuls of the previous year were left as *^^^'
* Livy, xxr. 22. • Litj, xxvi. 6,
» See Arnold, Hist, of R<me, iii. 239.
334 ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK proconsuls in command of the army before Capua, with
_ ^' ^ instructions not to withdraw from the siege until they had
taken the place. After the fall of Syracuse, the Bomans
justly looked upon the reduction of Capua as the most im-
portant object to be attained in Italy. The period when
Capua would fall could be calculated with tolerable ac-
curacy. It was determined by the quantity of provisions
which the besieged had had time to accumulate before
they were entirely cut off from external suppKes. Yet
there was one hope left. An agile Numidian succeeded
in making his way through both Boman lines, and in in-
forming Hannibal of the serious danger in which the town
was now placed. Hannibal immediately broke up from the
extreme south, with a body of light troops and thirty-three
elephants, and advanced by forced marches into Campania.'
Having stormed at Galatia * one of the outer posts which
the Bomans had erected all round Capua, he encamped
behind the ridge of Mount Tifata, and immediately
directed a brisk attack against the outer Boman lines,
whilst simultaneously the Capuans made a sally and tried
to force the inner circumvaUation. A Spanish cohort had
already scaled the mound, some elephants had been killed,
their bodies filled up the ditch and formed a bridge over
it, others had penetrated into one of the Boman camps,
and had spread terror and confusion,' But the Boman
forces were so numerous that they were able to keep their
ground, and to repel the enemy on both sides. Hanni-
bal was obliged to give up the plan of raising the blockade
of Capua by a direct attack on the Boman lines. He at
once changed his plan. Whilst the Bomans were prepar-
ing to meet a second attack, he left his camp at nightfall,
gave information to the Capuans of his intention, en-
couraged them to persevere, and set himself in motion
towards Bome.
* liivy, xrvi. 6.
' The sitoation of GiJatia, which is called a cattellum (Livy, zxvi. 5), is not
known.
' Livy, zzvi. 5, § 9. This is a second version mentioned hy IAyj,
THE SECOND PUNIC WAE. 835
No event in all the wars since the Gallic conflagration CHAP.
. VIII.
produced a deeper impression on the excitable masses of — r-^
the capital than the appearance of the dreaded Car- p^^,
thaginian before its walls. The most disastrous defeats and 212-21 1
the most glorious victories at a distance from Bome could
not work upon fear and hope in a manner so direct and H^il»l
powerful as the sight of a hostile camp before their eyes, towarde
The terrible words * Hannibal at the gates ! ' never vanished
from the memory of the Romans ; and the fear and anguish
with which these words were first heard enhanced the satis-
faction which was felt when, by the firmness of the senate
and the Roman people, the danger was overcome. For this
reason the imagination of narrators was particularly fertile
in adorning the stoiy of Hannibal's march to Some in a
manner flattering to the national pride. There arose a
nxmiber of stories, some altogether fictitious, others sug-
gested by mistakes ; and it is consequently impossible for
us to harmonise into a consistent narrative the statements
of the two principal witnesses, Polybius and Livy, which
di£Per in some essential points. We are compelled to
make a selection ; and as it appears that the report of
Livy, though not free from errors, is, on the whole, more in
harmony with the general course of events than that of
Polybius, we give the preference to it on this occasion.*
> According to Polybius, (ix. 3 ff.), Hannibal left his camp before Capua so
secretly, and marched so rapidly that he appeared before Rome before the news
of his march had arrived. The Romans therefore believed that their whole
army in Campania must have been annihilated, like the legions of Varro and
^milius Paullus at Cannae ; and if by a mere chance two newly raised legions
had not been in the town, there would have been no means of defending the
walls, except by the citizens themselves. If we bear in mind that Hannibal
could not march from Capua to Rome by the straight road (the Via Appia)
which was open to the Romans, but that he was obliged to take a circuitous
way, we shall think it hardly likely that he could proceed faster with the bulk
of his army, through a hostile and mountainous district, than a messenger
could ride on the direct way. Hence we may rather follow the account of Livy
(xxvi. 7 ff.), according to which the news of Hannibal's march preceded him
to Rome, and Hannibal did not use the utmost speed, but purposely delayed
his approach several days by laying waste the country. As his object was not
to surprise and take Rome, but to draw away the blockading army from.
Capua, this strategy is perfectly intelligible. In preferring this account to that
of Polybius, we agree with Rospatt (Feldsuffe des Hannibal^ p. 80), and differ
336
ROMAN mSTORY.
BOOK
i)ismay of
the Ro-
mans.
For five days Hannibal had lingered before Capua,* trying
in vain to raise the siege. In the night following the fifth
day he crossed the Voltumus in boats, and marched past
the Soman colony of Gales by Teanum on the Latin
road to the valley of the Liris, in the direction of Inter-
amna and Fregell^.^ All these towns were held by Roman
garrisons, and Hannibal conld not think of laying siege to
them. Nevertheless he felt so safe in the midst of the
hostile fortresses, with an army of 60,000 men in his rear
and Bome itself before him, that he leisurely plundered
the districts through which he marched, tarried a whole
day near Teanum, remained two days at Oasilinum and
then at Fregellae, and thus gave time to the Boman army
before Capua either to overtake him or to precede him to
Bome by the direct road. The former alternative he would
probably have preferred, for he sought above all things
to bring on a battle, and it was for this reason that he
devastated the country without mercy. But the Bomans
steadily adhered to their plan of avoiding a battle, and
allowed him to advance unmolested. From Fregelke
Hannibal marched further north, through the country of
the Hemicans, by Frusino, Ferentinum, and Anagnia, and
between Tibur and Tusculum reached the river Anio, which
he crossed in order to pitch his camp in sight of Bome,
and to announce his arrival by the conflagration of the
surrounding farms and villages.
Terror and dismay had preceded him. The fugitives,
who had with difiBlculty escaped the fast Numidian horse-
men, and had poured into Bome in vast crowds to jSnd
shelter for themselves, their property, and their cattle,
spread heart-rending reports of the cruelties committed by
the savage Punians. The rich, well-tilled country about
from Vincke {Der zweiU pun, Kriefff p. 282), Mommsen {Ram. Gesch. i. 649;
English translation, ii. 169), Peter {Cresch, Romst i* 336)> ai^d Arnold {Hist, of
Rvnie, iii. 242).
* Polybius, ix. 6, § 7.
' The road, as Livj (xzvi. 9) describes it, is unintelligible ; it goes right and
left, forwards and again backwards. Either the names of places are written
wrong, or Livy had an erroneous notion of the situation of the several places
between Capua and Bome. See above, p. 172.
THE SECOND PUNIC WAR 837
Eome, which since the days of King Pyrrhus had seen no CHAP,
enemy, was now the prey of war. He had arrived at last,
this dreaded Hannibal, before whose sword the sons of ^^^^^^h
Eome had fallen fast and thick as the ears of com before 212-211
the mower's scythe. The irresistible conqueror, whom no ^'^'
Soman general ventured to encounter, who but a very
short time before had annihilated two Soman armies, had
now arrived to accomplish his work, to raze the city of
Eome to the ground, to murder the men, and to carry
away the women and children into slavery far beyond the
sea. The city was filled with a tumult and a confusion
that were uncontrollable. Seeing a troop of Numidian
deserters pass down from the Aventine, the people, de-
mented with fright, thought the enemy was already in the
city. Maddened with despair, they thought of nothing
but flight, and would have rushed out of the gates if the
dread of encountering the hostile cavalry had not kept
them back. The women filled all the sanctuaries, poured
out their prayers and lamentations, and on their knees
swept the ground with their dishevelled hair.*
Yet Eome was not unprepared. Hannibal's intention Measures
of marching upon Eome had been made known by deserters senate,
even before he broke up from Capua,' and even without
such indirect or casual information his march could not
long remain a secret. When the news arrived, the first
thought of the senate was, as Hannibal had anticipated,
to withdraw the whole army forthwith from Capua for
the protection of the capital. But on the advice of the
cautious T. Valerius Placcus, it was resolved to order only
a portion of the legions linder Pulvius to come to Eome,
and to continue the blockade of Capua with the rest.
Fulvius therefore broke up with only 16,000 men, and
hastened to Eome by the Appian road, arriving either
simultaneously with Hannibal or a very short time after
him. As proconsul he could not have a military command
* Polybins. ix. 6. Livy, xxvi. 9.
* It seems not unlikely that Hannibal himself spread this news, as his object
vms to draw away the blockading army from Capua.
VOL. II. Z
338
ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK
IV.
Retreat of
HaDuib&l
from
Rome.
in the city of Borne. A decree of the senate, therefore,
conferred upon him a command equal to that of the
consnls of the year, and provided for the defence of the city.
The senate remained assembled on the Foram ; all those
who had in former years discharged the office of dictator,
consul, or censor were invested with the imperium for the
duration of the present crisis. A garrison, under the com-
mand of the prsetor C. Calpumius, occupied the Capitol, and
the consuls encamped outside the town towards the north-
east, between the Colline and the Esquiline gates. The
two newly raised legions, which happened to be in Borne,
joined to the army of the proconsul, were strong enough to
bafiELe any attempt of Hannibal to take the town by storm.
Accordingly Hannibal never ventured to make an attack.
He approached the city with a few thousand Numidians,
and leisurely rode along the walls, eagerly watched, but
undisturbed by the awe-struck garrison.* It was a trium-
phal procession, and Hannibal may have felt legitimate
pride in the thought that he had so far humbled his
enemies. But when he reflected that Bome, though hum-
bled, was still unconquered, all premature exultation must
have been suppressed, while his eye was fixed anxiously
on the dark future. So far he had realised his own and
his country's ardent wishes. With the devastation of
Italy and the blood of her sons, Bome had atoned for
the wrong which she had done to Carthage; but the
spirit of the Boman people was unsubdued, and it stood
even this severe test without despairing or even doubting
of ultimate success.
No battle was fought before Bome, as the Bomans did
not accept Hannibal's challenge*' It could not be un-
> According to Plinj {Hist. Not. zzziv. 16), he threw his spear across
the wall. This theatrical performance seems hardly worthy of Hannibal, and
the testimony of Pliny does not suffice to make it credible.
' According to livy (zxvi. 11), Flaccas, on two successive days, drew up fats
army in battle array in front of the army of Hannibal ; but each time a terrible
storm compelled both armies to seek shelter in their respective camps, where-
upon the weather immediately cleared up. This is evidently a legend, invented
for the purpose of clearing the Bomans of the reproach of cowardice. Not
THE SECOND PUNIC WAR.
339
known to Hannibal that a part at least of the blockading
army of Capua had been withdrawn, and was now opposed
to him. Perhaps he hoped that his plan had succeeded.
If he could draw the Bomans from their fortified position
under the walls of Borne, and beat them, and then return
to Capua, it was possible that the Capuans, if they had not
yet broken through the Boman lines, would now, in con-
junction with his army, repeat a combined attack upon the
Boman forces left to continue the blockade, and it was not
likely that this time such an attack would fail. In a few
days, therefore, he left the immediate neighbourhood
of Borne, marching in a north-easterly direction into the
country of the Sabines, then to the south-east through
the land of the Marsians and Felignians, to return to
Campania by a circuitous route. ^ He marked his road
with flames and devastation. The Boman consuls, as
he had expected, followed him, trying in Tain to protect
the land of their most faithful allies. After a march of
five days, Hannibal was informed that the Bomans had
not relinquished the blockade of Ca.pua^ and that only a
CHAP.
VIII.
FoTJBTH
Pebiod,
212-211
B.C.
more authenticated than this legend is the statement that^ whilst Hannibal was
before the gates of Rome, a reinforcement was sent (Livy, xzri. 11)» or was to
be sent (Zonaras, ix. 6), to Spain ; and the anecdote that the field where the
hostile army whs encamped waa sold for its fuU value. If it was added that
Hannibal, on hearing this, was so vexed that, out of bravado> he caused the
booths of the money-changers in the Roman forum to be put up to auction in
his camp, we can only express our surprise and regret that any Boman writer
could think Hannibal capable of such childish and impotent spite. The story
of the dispatch of auxiliaries for Spain, which is undoubtedly fictitious, sliows
how proud the Romans were of the alleged fact, that, in spke of Hannibal's
advance, they needed no great military force for the defence of the capital.
This circumstance throws some doubts on the statement that FUlvius marched
with only 16,000 men from Capua for the relief of Roate. No other writer
besides Livy mentions it, and we are consequently without the means of testing
his trustworthiness by other, independent evidence. But it is not at all impro-
bable that the number was made to appear so small to bring out more forcibly
the self-reliance of the Romans. Livy himself gives expression to this senti-
ment of pride in the words which he attributes to Fabius Maximus (c. 8), for
the purpose of dissuading the dispatch of any troops from Capua. If we are
entitled to infer that a larger portion of the blockading army really marched
from Capua to Rome, we should come to the conclusion that Hannibars calcu-
lation was less faulty than it seems to have been.
' Livy, xxvi. 11.
z 2
340 ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK portion of their army had left Campania. Suddenly he
' r^ — ' turned round upon the pursuing Romans, attacked them
in the night, stormed their camp, and routed them com-
pletely. But his plan was nevertheless thwarted. He found
out, like Pyrrhus, that he was fighting with the Hydra ;
the Boman lines round Capua were sufficiently defended ;
and seeing that there was no prospect of success if he
attempted to storm them, he turned aside and left Capua to
her fate. By forced marches he hastened through southern
Italy, and appeared unexpectedly before Bhegium. But
he was foiled in the attempt to surprise this town, and the
only result gained was an abundance of booty and prisoners,
which rewarded his soldiers for the unusual fatigues they
had undergone.
Fall of The fate of Capua was now sealed.^ The besieged
Capua. made one more attempt to call Hannibal to their rescue ;
but the Numidian who had undertaken to deliver the
dangerous message was discovered in the Boman camp,
and driven back into the town with his hands cut off.
The leaders of the revolt now foresaw what they would
have to expect. After the Capuan senate had formally
resolved to surrender the town, about thirty of the noblest
senators assembled in the house of Yibius Yirrius for
a last solemn banquet, and took farewell of one another,
resolved not to survive the ruin of their country. They
all swallowed poison and lay down to die. When the
gates were thrown open to admit the victorious army,
they were beyond the reach of Boman revenge. The
other senators of Capua relied on the generosity of Borne.
It is probable that all who were conscious of guilt had
sought death, and that the survivors were not directly
implicated in causing the defection of Capua. In all
such revolutions there is a wide difference between leaders
^ LiVy (xxvi. 12) rel&tes th&t the Roman senate once more offered par-
don to the people of Capua if thej would now surrender. This statement,
unless it is simply a repetition of a previous one, was invented by the annalists
to set forth the magnanimity of the Bomans and the perversity of the Capuans.
Nobody can credit it who knows the true character of the Koman people and
government.
THE SECOND PUNIC WAR.
341
and followers. No doubt many of the latter had no choice chap.
but to swim with the stream, and among them there > ^^^^' -
must have been many parents or relatives of the young ^ourth
Capuan knights who had either taken no part at all in the 212-211
revolt, or had gone over to the Eomans in the course of **°*
the war. Such men were justified in hoping for mercy.
But Q. Pulvius thirsted for blood, and Eoman policy
demanded a terrific example. The Capuan senators were
therefore sent in chains partly to Cales, partly to Teanum.
In the course of the night, Fulvius broke up with a
detachment of cavalry and reached Teanum before dawn.
He caused twenty-eight prisoners to be scourged and
beheaded before his eyes. Without delay he hastened to
Cales, and ordered twenty-five more to be put to death.
The awful rapidity with which he went through the work
of the executioner, without even the shadow of discrimina-
tion or trial, shows that his heart was in it. It is said
that, before he had done, he received a sealed letter from
Borne, which contained an order from the senate to
postpone the punishment of the guilty, and to allow
the senate to pronounce their sentence. Guessing the
contents of the letter, Pulvius left it unopened until all
his victims were dead. If this report is true, and if the
Eoman senate really intended to act with clemency, they
still had ample opportunity, even after the hot haste with
which Pulvius had slaked his thirst for revenge. But as
the Eoman senate, far from exhibiting a spirit of clemency,
continued to treat prostrate Capua with exquisite harshness
and cruelty, we feel it difficult to credit the report.
That Placcus had carried out the intention of the Treatment
Eoman government is clear from the treatment of the by the Ro-'*
two small Campanian towns, Atella and Calatia, which °**°^-
had revolted, and were now reduced at the same time as
Capua. The leading men of these two places were put to
death.* Three hundred of the chief citizens of Capua,
* Concerning their number, see Weissenbom's note to Livy zxtI. K
342 EOMAN HISTORY.
BOOK Calatia, and Atella * were dragged to Home, cast into
s — r^ — ' prison, and left to die of starvation; others were dis-
tributed as prisoners over the Latin towns, where they all
perished in a similar manner. The rest of the guilty, i.e.
those who had themselves borne arms against Borne, or
whose relations had so done, or who had discharged any
public office since the breaking out of the revolt,* were
sold as slaves, with their wives and childreut Those
who were not guilty, i.e. those who at the time of the
revolt had not been in Campania, or who had gone over
to the Romans, or who had taken no active part in the
insurrection, lost only their land and part of their movable
property, but were left in the enjoyment of personal free-
dom, and received permission to settle within certain
limits away from Campania. The towns of Capua, Atella,
and Calatia, and the whole district belonging to them,
became the property of the Bom an people. The right of
municipal self-government was withdrawn, and a prefect,
annually sent from Bome, was intrusted with the ad-
ministration of the district, which, instead of a free
community, contained henceforth only a motley population
of workmen, farmers of the public land and of the revenue,
tradesmen, and other adventurers — a population destitute
of all those hallowed associations and feelings of attach-
ment to the soil which to the people of antiquity were
the basis of patriotism and all civic virtues. The flourish-
ing city of Capua, once the rival of Bome, was blotted out
fi'om among the list of Italian towns, and was henceforth
let out by the Boman people *like to a tenement or
pelting farm.' We cannot, of course, expect to find among
the men that fought against Hannibal that chivalrous
spirit and generosity which in general characterise modern
warfare. To what extent they acted in the spirit of
their contemporaries we can judge most clearly from the
manner in which the tender-hearted, humane Livy, two
> According to Zonaras (is. 6), the people of Atella left their town in a bodj
{rraif^yL^X) and joined Hannibal.
* Livy, xxvi. 34.
THE SECOND PUNIC WAE. 343
centuries later, spoke of their proceedings. He calls them CHAP,
in every respect laudable. * Severely and quickly/ he
says, ' the most guilty were punished ; the lower classes of p^^J
the people were dispersed without the hope of return ; the 212-211
innocent buildings and walls were preserved from fire and **^'
destruction; and, by the preservation of the most beautiful
town of Campania, the feelings of the neighbouring
peoples were spared, whilst at the same time the interests
of the Soman people were consulted.'^
The final decision of the fate of Capua, which we have Execution
here related, did not follow immediately after the hurried ^[ -r^^^
punishment of those who were principally guilty. It was
postponed to the year following, and by a decision of the
popular assembly intrusted to the senate. Meanwhile
Capua was occupied by a Boman garrison and strictly
guarded. No one was allowed to leave the town without
permission. Yet there were some Campanians at Bome ;
perhaps the three hundred who at the time of the revolt
were serving as horsemen with the Boman legions in
Sicily, and who, as a reward for their fidelity, had been
received as Boman citizens. These unfortunate men also
were now doomed to experience the adverse fate which
' lAry, xxvi. 16: ' Ita ad Capuam res eompositaB consilio ab omni parte
laudabili: severe et celeriter in maxime noxios animadrersnm ; multitudo
civium dissipata in nollam spem reditus ; non Btevitum incendiis minisque in
tecta innoxia murosque, et cum emolumento qusesita etiam apud socios lenitatis
species, incolnmitate urbis nobilissimte opxdentissimflequef cuius minis omnis
Campania, omnes qui Campaniam circa accolunt popnli ingemuissent/ Compare
Valerius Maximus, iii. 8, 1. These sentiments scarcely come home to our
feelings. What is the value of the ' incolumitas urbis/ which consists in the
preservation of stones and timber, whilst the inhabitants were expelled, sold
into slavery, or killed ? Is it not a mockery of right, if Livy finds it meritorious
and laudable that the houses and walls were spared, to the advantage of the
Boman state ? There is perhaps no greater contrast anywhere between anti-
quity and modem times than in the range of human sympathies and love. As
eveiy nation, and even eveiy city, had formerly its own god and its own reli-
gion, there existed no moral and no religious obligation with regard to the
members of other communities. It was only when mankind gradually rose to
the conception of one God of the universe, and when Christianity taught us to
lore our enemies as ourselves, that men ceased to look with pleasure or indif-
ference at the Bufferings of men differing from them in race, language, or even
geographical locality alone.
844 ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK seemed inexorably bent on destroying the people of
> Capua.* It happened that a conflagration broke out in
Borne, which raged for a whole night and day, destroyed a
number of shops and other buildings — among them the
ancient palace of Numa, the official residence of the cbief
pontiff — and which even threatened the adjoining temple
of Vesta. The style of building then prevalent at Eome,
the narrow streets, and the absence of fire-police and
engines, rendered such a calamity no matter for surprise.
But the imminent danger which had threatened one of
the principal sanctuaries of Rome — a sanctuary on whose
preservation the safety of the city depended — spread
general consternation, and suggested the idea that the
fire was not accidental, but caused by some bitter enemy
of the commonwealth. By order of the senate, the consul
accordingly issued a proclamation, promising a public
reward to any one who would point out the men guilty of
the supposed crime. By this proclamation a premium was
offered to any villain who might succeed in concocting
the story of a plot plausible enough to be credited by the
excited populace. An informer was soon found. A slave
of some 3'oung Campanians, the sons of Pacuvius Calavius,*
declared that his masters and five other young Capuans,
whose fathers had been put to death by Q. Fulvius, had
conspired, out of revenge, to set Bome on fire. The
unfortunate young men were seized. Their slaves were
tortured to confess that they had caused the fire by order
of their masters. This confession under torture, the
eternal disgrace of the Boman law procedure, established
the guilt of the Capuans to the satisfaction of their judges,
and the men were all executed, whilst the informer received
his freedom as a reward.
' Livy, xxvi. 27.
' See above, p. 260. These young men belonged, in aU probability, to the
Gampanian knights who served in Sicily at the time of the revolt. If this
coi^ectnre is true, we can understand why some of the victims of Fulvius
hoped for mercy. They expected, as has been suggested in the text (p. 340 f.),
that the faithful services of their sons would atone for any transgressions of
their own, and at least secure them from capital punishment
THE SECOND PUNIC WAR. 345
It is not absolutely necessary to assume that this revolt- CHAP,
ing sentence of death was inspired by hatred of the con- ^^^' -
quered Capuans. The Bomans, in their savage ignorance, Foubth
raged not less fiercely against themselves, and had given 212-211
a proof of this as late as 331 B.C., by the execution of one ^'^*
hundred and seventy innocent matrons.^ But the pre- ^P^*?*-
•^ * tion of
vailing hatred of Capua caused the story of the wretched Roman
informer to be received with ready credulity, just as the P^"^*
English nation, besotted with terror at the time of the
Popish plot, greedily swallowed auy lies which villains like
Oates and Dangerfield were pleased to concoct. The cruel
sentence pronounced on the young Capuans in Borne was
a worthy introduction to the decrees of the senate which
blotted out the old rival for ever. It was a consequence
of the municipal constitution of the republic that Bome
could not brook another great town besides herself. This
was the reason why, even in the legendary period, Alba
Longa was crushed, and at a subsequent period Yeii was
doomed to destruction. It was now the turn of Capua to
sink into the dust; and no long period elapsed before
that other rival city followed which was now struggling
desperately with Bome, under the thorough conviction that
she must either conquer or perish. Wherever the republican
armies planted their iron foot, they stamped out the life of
all towns which might enter into competition with Bome.
It was not before Bome itself had bowed her proud head
under an imperial master that municipal prosperity
returned to the great centres of art, learning, and com-
merce in the subjected countries.
* See vol. i. p. 667.
346 EOMAK HISTORY.
Fifth Period of the Hanmbalian War*
FBOM THE FALL OF CAPUA TO THE BATTLE OK THE
METAUBUSy 211-207 B.C.
BOOR The re-conquest of Capua marks the turning-point in
— J — ' the second Punic war. From the time when Hannibal had
ChftDffe in crossed the AJps to the battle of Caome the destructive
the charac- waves which had inundated Italy had risen li%her and
^yar. higher, had borne down one obstacle afber another, and had
threatened to engulf the whole fabric of Boman dominion.
After the day of Cannae the waters spread far and wide over
Italy; but they rose no higher. Most of the Boman aUies,
and these the most valuable, resisted the impulse to revolt
which carried along the Capuans to their own destruction.
The colonies and Bome herself remained firm; and now at
length, after a seven years' struggle, a decided turn of the
tide took place. Bome had passed through the worst ;
her safety was secured, and even her dominion over Italy
seemed no longer exposed to any serious danger. Hence-
forth she could continue the war with full confidence in a
final triumph.
Dispatch The firstfruit of the victory in Campania was the re-
winfo^ storation of Boman superiority in Spain, which had been
mente to lost by the reverses and the death of the two Scipios. Spain
^"°* was justly looked upon as an outlying fortress of Carthage,
whence a second attack on Italy might at any time be
expected. To prevent such an attack had hitherto been
the principal object of the Boman generals in Spain. In
the gloomy period after the battle of Cannie the two
Scipios had succeeded in accomplishing this task by the
victory over Hasdrubal at Ibera; and it is perhaps no
exaggeration to say that by it they had saved Bome from
destruction.* When the Carthaginians had recovered
> See above, p. 268.
THE SECOND PUNIC WAR.
347
from their defeat at Ibera, and had victoriouslj ended the
war with the Numidians in Africa, thej had resumed the
war in Spain with new vigour, and the consequence was
the almost total destruction of the Boman armies in Spain*^
It was, for Home, a most lucky coincidence that at this
critical season a part of the forces that had besieged
Capua became disposable for other purposes. C. Claudius
Nero was accordingly summoned from Campania, and in
the course of the same summer (211 B.C.) sent, with about
two legions,' to Spain, to rally the remnants of the Scipionic
army, and to incorporate them with his own. Nero suc-
ceeded not only in efiFectually defending the country
between the Pyrenees and the Ebro, but he is said even to
have undertaken an expedition far into the Carthaginian
possessions, and to have so far out-manceuvred Hasdrubal
that he might have made him prisoner with his whole
army if he had not been duped by the wily Carthaginian.'
This statement appears to deserve no more credit than
the pretended exploits of Marcius.^ The situation of the
Romans in Spain, even in the following year (210 b.o.),
was very critical, and it was resolved in Eome to send
thither an additional force of 11,000 men. The command
of this reinforcement was intrusted to Publius Cornelius
Scipio, a young man only twenty-seven years of age,
who had as yet discharged but one public office, viz.
that of eedile, and had never before had any independent
military command, but who was destined to rise suddenly
into distinction, and finally to triumph over Hannibal
himself.
Publius Cornelius Scipio was the son of Lucius Cornelius
Scipio, and nephew of Publius Cornelius Scipio, the two
brothers who had fought and fallen in Spain. His first
appearance on the stage of history is marked by a series
of events which are startling and somewhat mysterious in
their character, and calculated to chaUenge serious doubts.
CHAP.
VIII.
Fifth
Pbriod,
211-207
B.C.
Early life
of PubliuB
Cornelius
Scipio.
> In the 7ear212 or 211. See above, p. 317» note I.
' He had 12,000 foot and 1,000 horse. Livy, zxri. 17.
• Li7y,3am. 17. * See p. 317, note 2.
348 ROMAN mSTOKY.
BOOK It does not at all appear that, as r^ards external attesta-
IV.
. tion, the history of Scipio's exploits stands on a higher
level than that of the preceding events. And yet we
know that Polybius — the most intelligent, sober, and con-
scientions investigator of facts in the history of Borne — had
close and intimate relations with the honse of the Scipios,
and that he drew his information directly from C. Leelins,
the friend and associate of Scipio himself.^ Bnt we find,
both in Polybius and Liyy, statements regarding Scipio
which remind ns of the time when the Roman annals were
full of random assertions, errors, exaggerations, and impu-
dent fictions. We are therefore obliged to sift with par-
ticular care all those accounts which refer to Scipio's
character, to his military exploits, and the political trans*
actions in which he took a part.
Family in- for some generations the family of the Scipios had
the belonged to the most prominent of the republic. Since
Sdpios in ^Q ^jj^Q ^yf ii^Q Samnite wars they were almost regularly
in possession of one or other of the great offices of state.
Their family pride was intense, and has left lasting
monuments in the epitaphs which have come down to us.^
It is evident that their influence among the noble families
of Rome was very considerable. Cneius Scipio Asina, who,
in the fifth year of the Sicilian war, had, by his want of
judgment, caused the loss of a Roman squadron, and had
himself been made prisoner of war,* was, in the course of
the same war, again appointed to high office. In the
Hannibalian war, the influence of this family had risen so
greatly that the conduct of the war in Spain was, year after
year, confided to the two brothers Publius and Cneius
Scipio, in a manner altogether at variance with the regular
practice of the republic. The Scipios disposed, in Spain,
of the armies and the resources of the Roman people as
if they were the uncontrolled masters, and not the servants,
of the state ; and they conducted the administration of the
province, and the diplomatic relations with the Spanish
* Polybius, z. 3. ' See vol. i. p. 459 ; Tol. ii. p. 63.
' Sea above, p. 55.
B.C.
THE SECOND PUNIC WAR. 349
tribes, as they thought proper. It seemed that the senate chap.
had intrusted the management of the Spanish war entirely ^ . y_^
to the family of the Scipios, as in the legendary period ^^^
the war with the Veientines was made over as a family 211-207
war * to the Fabii. Their command was cut short only by
their death, and it was now transferred to the son of one
of them, as if it was hereditary in the family. The manner,
too, in which this was done was strange in itself, and
had on no occasion been known before. Such men as
Pomponius and Centenius, it is true, had in the course of
the war been intrusted with the command of detachments
of troops, without having ever previously discharged any of
the offices to which the * imperium ' was attached.^ But
the troops of these officers were wholly, or for the most
part, volunteers and irregulars, and they were bent more
on plundering and harassing the revolted allies of Bome
than on fighting the Carthaginians. On the other hand,
the supreme command of the Boman legions in Spain was
a matter of the greatest importance. The senate had not
allowed the brave L. Marcius to retain the command of
the remnants of the Spanish army, though it was due to
him that any portion of it was saved. Nor was it the want
of able generals, such as the Bomans could boast of, that
made it absolutely necessary to place at the post of danger
an inexperienced young man, who had not yet given proofs
of his ability. C. Claudius Nero, who had rendered good
service during the siege of Capua, and who afterwards
proved himself a master of strategy in the campaign against
Hasdrubal, had already been sent to Spain. There was no
reason why he should not be left there, and if there had
been an objection to him, there were other tried officers
in abundance, fit to take the command. The eulogists of
Scipio related a silly story, viz., that nobody came forward
to volunteer his services for the dangerous post in Spain,'
> A * familiare bellum/ as it is called by Livy (ii. 48).
• See above, pp. 318-330.
■ Livy, XX vi. 18: 'Primo expectaverant, ut qui se tanto imperio dignos
crederent, nomina profiterentur. Quae ut destituta expectatio est, redintegratos
350
ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK
IV.
Character
of Scipio.
and that Scipio, by boldly declaring his readiness to onder-
take the command, inspired the people with admiration
and confidence, and in a manner compelled them to give
the appointment to him. The Boman republic wonld
indeed have been in a deplorable condition, if cowardice
had restrained even one man capable of command from
dedicating his services to the state in a post of danger.
It was not so. The appointment of Scipio was dne to the
position and influence of his family.* It was one of the
irregularities caused by the war, and a long time elapsed
before proconsular command was again conferred on a man
who had not previously been consul.
Scipio was, however, a man far above the average of his
contemporaries, and there was in him greatness of mind,
which could not fail to rivet general attention.* His
character was not altogether of the ancient Boman type.
There was in it an element which displeased men of the
old school, and which, on the other hand, gained for him
the admiration and esteem of the people. His bearing was
proud, his manners reserved. From his youth his mind
was open to poetical and religious impressions. He believed,
or pretended, that he was inspired ; but his keen under-
standing kept this germ of fanaticism within the bounds
of practical usefulness to his political purposes. Whether
the piety that he displayed ostentatiously, his visions and
communions with the deity, were the results of honest
conviction, as his contemporaries believed, or whether
they were merely political manoeuvres, as Polybius thought,'
luctus accepts dadis desideriumque imperatorum amissomm/ etc
' fremuuty adeo perditas res desperatumqne de republica esse, ut nemo audeat in
Hispaniam imperium accipere ; cum sabito P. Cornelius . . . professius se pet^re
in superiore unde conspici posset loco coDstitit,' etc.
' This is apparent in his election to the sedileship (Livy, xxv. 2). As sedile
he made himself popular by his liberality. Livy, ibid : ' Ludi Homani pro tern-
poris illius copiis magnifice facti et diem unimi instaurati et congii olei in ricos
fiingulos dati.' In this passage it s^ems that before the word * congii/ a num-
ber has dropped out of the text. Compare Weissenbom's note.
' Polybius, X. 2, § 2 : Ty yap ffx^Hhv lwupw4<rrafrop ainhy ytyoviwat r&v vfA
rov, Crrrovct fiiy irdrrcs •iSei'oi, rls iror* ^if ic.t.A.
* Polybius, X. 2, § 12 : U6ir\iQS ivtpya(6tJL€vo5 &cl Srf^av toIs iroAAoi^, &s ner^
J
THE SECOND PUNIC WAR. 351
intended to deceive the populace and to serve his political chap.
ends, we can hardlj decide with any degree of certainty.
as no genuine speeches or writings of his are preserved, ^"h
which might have revealed the true nature of his mind. 211-207
But whatever we maj think of the genuineness of his ^'^'
enthusiasm, it appears un-Boman in any light. His
imaginative mind was powerfully affected by the creations
of Greek poetry. It is not incredible that he may himself
have believed stories like that of his descent from a god.'
If he did, he will stand higher in our esteem than if we
look upon him as a clever impostor.
In the autumn of the year 210,' Scipio sailed fr^m the Departure
Tiber under a convoy of thirty ships of war, with fo, s^^^.
10,000 foot and 1,000 horse. The second in command
under him was the proprsetor, M. Junius Silanus;
the fleet was under the orders of C. Leelius, Scipio's inti-
mate friend and admirer. As usual the fleet sailed along
the coast of Etruria, Liguria,and Gaul, instead of striking
straight across the Tyrrhenian Sea. In Emporiee, a
trading settlement of the Massilians, the troops were
disembarked. Thence Scipio marched by land to Tarraco,
the chief town of the Roman province, where he spent the
winter in preparation for the coming campaign.
The plan of this campaign was made by Scipio with the Plans of
utmost secrecy, and was communicated to his friend ***°*
Lselius alone. He had received information that the three
r^s Bttof hcofoUtt woioiiiwos rhi iirifio\J^ §if$afKrt<rr4povs ica2 irpo9vfAOT4pavf
KartirK€6a(t robs fmaru/rroyAvovs irphs rk Scu^ rmv tftr^w, Li^y* zzvi. 19 : Fuit
eoim Scipio non yeris tantum virtutibas mirabilis, Bed arte quoque qnad&m ab
iuventa in ostentationem eamm eompositos, pleraque apud moltitadinem ant
per noctumas visa species ant Telut divinitns mente monita agens, sive et ipse
capti quadam snperstitione animi, sive ut imperia oonsiltaqne velut sorte oracnli
missa sine cnnctatione ezaequerentur. Ad hoc iam inde ab initio pneparans
animos ex qno togam Tirilem snmpsit, nnllo die prina ullam publicum priva-
tamqne rem egit qnam in Capitolinm iret ingressuaque edem consideret et
pleromqne solns in secreto ibi tempns tereret/ etc. * His miraculis ntinqnam ab
ipso elasa fides est, qnin potins ancta arte quadam nee abnuendi tale qnidquam
nee palam afflrmandi.
' Ckllius, Noctes Attieat vii. 1.
' The time cannot be fixed accurately. See Becker, Vorarbeiten t. zweUen
puniseh, Krieg, p. 118 £E1, and WeiMenborn*s note to LiTj, xxviiL 16.
352
ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK
IV.
Siege and
capture
of r*ew
Carthage.
CarUiaginian armies, commanded by Mago and the two
Hasdrabals, were stationed at great distances from one
another and from New Carthago. This important place
was intrusted to the insufficient protection of a garrison
of only one thousand men. Thus an opportunity was
offered of seizing by a bold stroke the military capital of
the Pnnians in Spain, whose excellent harbour was indis-
pensable to their fleet, and where they had their magazines,
arsenal, storehouses, dockyards, their military chest, and
the hostages of many Spanish tribes. The preparations
for this expedition were made with the greatest secrecy.
The very unlikelihood of an attack had lulled the Cartha-
ginian generals into a criminal security, and compromised
the safety of the town. If New Carthage were able to hold
out only a few days, or if Hasdrubal, who was at a distance
of ten days' march, had the least suspicion of Scipio's plan,
it had no chance of success. It was bold and ingenious,
and is so much more creditable to its author as the sad
fate of his father and uncle might have been expected to
make him lean rather to the side of caution and timidity
than of daring enterprise.
In the first days of spring (209 B.C.) Scipio broke up
with his land army of 26,000 infantry and 2,500 horse,
and marched from Tarraco along the coast southward,
whilst Lfielius, with a fleet of thirty-five vessels, kept
constantly in sight. Arriving unexpectedly before New
Carthage,' the united force immediately laid siege to
the town by land and sea. New Carthage lay at the
northern extremity of a spacious bay, which opened
southwards, and whose mouth was protected by an island
as by a natural breakwater, so that inside of it ships could
ride in perfect safety. Tinder the walls of the town on
iU ,e..L ride, s Lro- ri^p of I»d w» coW b,
shallow water, a continuation of the bay ; and this sheet of
water extended some way northwards, leaving only a sort
of isthmus, of inconsiderable width, which connected the
* According to PolybiuB (x. 9, § 7), in only seyen days. This is impos-
fsible. The distance from Tarraco to New Carthage is too great ; ev^n from
the £bro an army would take longer to march to Carthagena.
B.C.
THE SECOND PUNIC WAE. 353^
town with the mainland and was fortified by high walls CHAP.
VIII
and towers. New Carthage had therefore almost an in- ..» ^1^
sular position, and was very well fortified by nature and ^^^
art. But it had a weak side, and this had been betrayed 211-207
by fishermen to the Eoman general. During ebb tide the
water of the shallow pool west of the town fell so much
that it was fordable, and the bottom was firm. On this
information Scipio laid his plan, and, in the expectation
that he would be able to reach from the water an un-
defended part of the wall, he promised to his soldiers the
co-operation of Neptune. But first he drew off the atten-
tion of the garrison to the northern side of the town. He
began by making a double ditch and mound from the sea to
the bay, in order to be covered in the rear against attacks
&om the Punic army in case the siege should be postponed
and Hasdrubal should advance to relieve the town. Then
having easily beaten off the garrison, which had made a
foolhardy attempt to dislodge him, he immediately attacked
the walls. Having an immense superiority of numbers,
the Eomans might hope by relieving one another to tire
out the garrison. They tried to scale the walls with
ladders, but met with so stout a resistance that after a
few hours Scipio gave the signal to desist. The Cartha-
ginians thought the assault was given up, and hoped to
be able to repose from their exertions. But towards even-
ing, when the ebb tide had set in, the attack was renewed
with double violence. Again the Bomans assailed the
walls and applied their ladders on all parts. Whilst the
attention of the besieged was thus turned to the northern
side, which they thought was exclusively endangered by
the second attack, as by the first, a detachment of five
hundred Romans forded the shallow water on the west,
and reached the wall without being perceived. They
quickly scaled it, and opened the nearest gate from the
inside. Neptune had led the Ilomans through his own ele-
ment to victory. New Carthage, the key of Spain, the
basis of the operations against Italy, was taken, and the
issue of the Spanish war was determined.
VOL. II. A A
854 ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK On the occasion of the taking of New Carthage, Polybius
- / ^ relates the Eoman custom observed in the plundering of
Roman ^ town taken by storm.* He tells us that for a time the
regulations soldiers used to cut down every living creature they met,
Back of not men only, but even brute animals. When this
towns. butchery had lasted as long as the commander thought
proper, a signal was given to call the soldiers back from
it, and then the plundering began. Only a portion of the
army, never more than one-half, was allowed to plunder,
lest during the inevitable disorder the safety of the whole
might be compromised. But the men selected for plunder-
ing a town were not allowed to keep anything for them-
selves. They were obliged to give up what they had
taken, and the booty was equally distributed among all
the troops, including even the sick and wounded.
Disposal The commanding general had a right of disposing of
booty. the whole of the booty as he deemed proper. He could, if
he liked, reserve the whole, or a part of it, for the public
treasury. If he did so, he made himself of course ob-
noxious, like Camillus in the old legend, to the soldiers ;
and it seems that, in the time of the Punic wars, it was
the general practice to leave the booty to the troops. Only
a portion of it — more especially the military chest, maga-
zines, materials of war, works of art, and captives — was
taken possession of by the quaestor for the benefit of the
state. The rest was given to the soldiers, and served as
a compensation and reward for the dangers and hardships
of the service, which were very inadequately rewarded by
the military pay.
Plunder of The booty made at New Carthage was very considerable.
^Tatv Car* I
thage. This town had been the principal military storehouse of
the Carthaginians in Spain, and contained hundreds of
baUistse, catapults, and other engines of war with pro-
jectiles, large sums of money, and quantities of gold and
silver, eighteen ships, besides materials for building and
> Polybius, X. 15, § 4: 'O 9> n6ir\ios ivtl roi)i tlfftXiiXvd^as it^to^pw
iwtXdfi^t elKoi, rohs fi^y wAeiVroi/s i<l>riKt Korh rh itap* ovroti Wof M roits iw
Tp irrfXei irapayyei\as Krfii/§iv rhy Traparvx^yra Kal firiifyhs
B.C.
THE SECOND Pl^IC WAR. 365
equipping sliips.^ The prisoners were of especial value, chap.
The garrison, it is true, was not numerous, and had no *- — ^-1-^
doubt been reduced by the fight;* but among the prisoners ;^^^^
was Hanno, the commander, two members of the smaller 211-207
Carthaginian council or executive board, and fifteen of
the senate, who represented the Carthaginian government
in the field. All these were sent to Borne. The inhabi-
tants of the town who had escaped the massacre, 10,000
in number, as it is stated, might have been sold as slaves,
according to the ancient right of war, but were allowed
by Scipio to retain their liberty ; ' several thousand skilled
workmen, who had been employed in the dockyards and
arsenals, as ship-carpenters, armourers, or othenvise, were
kept in the same capacity, and were promised their free-
dom if they served the republic faithfully and effectually.
The strongest of the prisoners Scipio mixed up with
the crews of his fleet, and was thus enabled to man the
eighteen captured vessels. These men also received
the promise that, if they conducted themselves well,
they should receive their freedom at the end of the war.
But the most precious part of the booty consisted of
the hostages of several Spanish tribes, who had been kept
in custody in New Carthage.* Scipio hoped by their
means to gain the friendship of those subjects or allies of
Carthage for whose fidelity they were to be a pledge. He
treated them therefore with the greatest kindness^ and
told them that their fate depended entirely on the conduct
' As usual there is a great dirergenco in the numbers given by the different
writers. According to Silenus, the Bomans took sixty scorpions (a kind of
balUsta). Valerius Antias raises this number to 19,000. No wonder that
Livy, who could digest a good deal of exaggeration, exclaims (xxvi. 49) :
* Adeo nullus mentiendi modus est ! ' — Compare Livy, xxvi. 47 ; Polybius,
X. 17.
^ The same uncertainty as to numbers meets us here again. Polybius
states the number to have been 1 ,000, others 2,000, 7,000, and even as many as
10,000.— Livy, xxvi. 49.
' Polybius, X. 17, § 8 : oJhoi iily oZy &fia Baucp^omfs Koi x^P^^^^^ ^'"^ "^V
ir(tpa86^<p rrjs fformpiat irpoCKvirfiiTayrti rhy arparTiyhy iif\(t$ii(ray,
* Polybius, X. 18. According to Livy (xxvi. 49), the number of these
hostages varies in different authors between 300 and 3,724 ! No wonder that
Livy says, * Quantus numerus fuerit piget scribere.'
A A 2
356
ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK
IV.
Personal
anecdotes
of Scipio.
of their countrymen, and that he would send them all
home if he could be assured of the good disposition of the
Spanish peoples.*
The narrative of the conquest of New Carthage is
adorned with some anecdotes, the object of which is to extol
the generosity, the delicacy of feeling, and the self-control
of the great Scipio. According to one of these stories,'
there was among the hostages a venerable matron, the
vrife of the Spanish chief Mandonius, the brother of
Indibilis, king of the Hergetes, and several of the youthful
daughters of the latter. These ladies had been treated
with indignity by the Carthaginians, but the sense of
female modesty at first kept the noble matron from ex-
pressing in distinct words her wish that the Romans would
treat them more as became their rank, age, and sex. Scipio,
with fine discrimination, guessed what she hardly ventured
to pray for, and granted the request.
Again, when his soldiers, bringing to him a Spanish lady,
remarkable for her dazzling beauty, desired him to take ber
as a prize worthy of himself alone, he caused the damsel
to be restored to her father, subduing a passion which had
often triumphed over the greatest heroes, and from which he
himself was by no means exempt. This story, related in
its credible simplicity by Polybius, was further enlarged
and adorned by Livy, who speaks of the lady as the be-
trothed of a powerful Spanish prince, to whom Scipio, like
the hero in a play, restores her unharmed, with aU the
pathos of conscious virtue and youthful enthusiasm. The
rich presents which her parents had brought for her ransom
Scipio gives to the happy bridegroom, as an addition to her
dowry. The Spaniard reveres Scipio like a god, and finaUy
' Livy (xzvi. 49) makes Scipio address the hostages in the following words :
' Vcnisse eos in populi Eomani potestatem qui beneficio quam metu obligare
homines malit extersisque gentes fide ac societate rinctas habere quam tristi
siibiectas senritio.* How could any Eoman, who knew and composed the
history of his country, write these words I Had lAvy forgotten, what he
himself so often relates, that the Romans were in the habit of taking hostages,
not only from recently conquered barbarians, but from their old Italian allies ?
(Compare Livy, rxv. 7 ; xxix. 3) ; and what else was it but a * triste
servitium ' that drove the subjected people of Sicily and Sardinia to rebellion?
* Polybius, X. 18. Livy, xxvi. 49.
THE SECOND PUNIC WAR. 857
joins tlie Boman army as a faithful ally, at the head of a CHAP.
VTTT
picked body of 1,400 horse. If we compare the simple story •_^
of Polybius with the little novel into which it is worked j^'^"^
up by Livy, we may in some measure understand how 211-207
many stories were expanded by a natural process of gradual "'^'
growth and development. The characteristics of fiction
are often unmistakable, but it is not often possible to
lay them bare by documentary evidence. If our sources
could be traced even beyond Polybius, we should perhaps
find that the whole story of Scipio's generosity towards
captured ladies emanates from the desire of comparing
him with Alexander the Great, who in a similar manner
treated the family of Darius after the battle of Issos.^
In the narrative of the great Hannibalian war, which was Effects of
carried on simultaneously in so many different parts, we New Car-
cannot sometimes avoid shifting the scenes suddenly, and thage.
turning our attention away from events before they have
reached a sort of natural conclusion. The taking of New
Carthage determined the fate of the Carthaginian dominion
in Spain, which now rested on the distant town of Gades
* That thiB comparison is at the bottom of the whole story seems to result
from a passage of Gellius (vi. 8, 3) : ' Lepida qasestio agitari potest, utrum
videri continentiorem par sit, Publiumne Africanum Superiorem, qui Cartha-
giue, ampla civitate in Hispania, ezpugnata, virginem tempestivam forma
egregia, nobilis viri Hispani iiliam, captam perductamque ad se, patri in-
violatam reddidit; an regem Alexandrum, qui Darii regis uzorem, eandemque
eiasdem sororem, proelio magno captam, q\iam esse audiebat exsuperanti
forma, ndere noluit, producique ad se prohibuit.' That the alleged occurrence
is not a historical fact, but a mere fiction, follows from the freedom with which
Valerius Antias (not a very trustworthy author, it is true) relates (according to
Gellius, loc, cit.) the very opposite, viz. : ' Earn puellam non redditam patri,
sed retentam a Scipione atque in deliciis amoribusque ab eo usurpatam/ It
appears that Scipio's virtue was, even in his own lifetime, not in good odour.
If his friends tried to give vouchers for it, by such stories as the one in
question, his enemies gave them a wrong turn, which made them prove the
very opposite ; and they could refer as to an admitted fact, ^lAcryvi^y cimi
rhy U6ir\toy (Polybius, z. 19, § 3 ; compare Gellius, vi. 8), a circumstance
without which the whole story would be without a point. In conclusion, let
us remark that it is difficult to see where and how the ' Eoman youths ' got
possession of the noble Spanish lady. If she was one of the hostages, as we
may infer, she oould not, as a chance captive, fall into the hands of some
chance captors, but was, by her position, secured from the brutal treatment to
which Scipio's yonng friends destined her.
358
ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK
IV.
Disposi-
tion of the
Italian
towns.
Difficulties
of Hanni-
bal's posi-
tion.
Betrayal of
Salapia to
Harcellus.
alone ; but before we can trace the sequel of events which
led to the total expulsion of the Carthaginians, we must
watch the progress of the war in Italy, where, as long as
Hannibal commanded an unconquered Punic army, the
Bomans had still most to fear and the Carthaginians to
hope.
The re-conquest of Capua in 211 B.C. was by far the
most decisive success which the Roman arms had gained
in the whole course of the war. With Capua Hannibal
lost the most beautifnl fruit of his greatest victory. He
had now no longer any stronghold in Campania, and was
in consequence obliged to retire into the southern parts of
the peninsula. It became more and more difficult for him
to maintain the Italian towns that had joined him. The
Italians had lost confidence in his star. Everywhere the
adherents of Rome gained ground, and the temptation
became greater to purchase her forgiveness by a timely
return to obedience, coupled, if possible, with a betrayal
of the Punic garrisons.
Thus Hannibal's ingenious plan of overpowering Borne
with the aid of her allies had failed. How could he now
hope, after the fall and dreadful punishment of Capua, to
win over the smaller Italian towns which had hitherto
remained faithful to Rome? Those who had previously
rebelled he could protect only by strong detachments of
his army from internal treason and from the attacks of
enemies without. But he could not spare the men
necessary for such a service, and he did not like to
expose his best troops to the danger of being betrayed
and cut off in detail. It seemed, therefore, advisable
rather to give up untenable towns voluntarily than to risk
the safety of valuable troops in their defence.
The necessity of such measures became apparent by the
treason which in the year 210 delivered Salapia into the
hands of the Romans. Salapia, one of the larger towns of
Apulia, had joined the cause of Hannibal soon after the
battle of Cannse. It contained a garrison of five hundred
picked Numidians. After the fall of Capua, tlie Roman
THE SECOND PUNIC WAR. 359
party in Salapia regained confidence and strength, and CHAP.
succeeded in betraying the town to the consul Marcellus, > ,-L^
on which occasion the brave Numidians were cut down to p^^„
the last man.^ Marcellus, who was consul for the fourth 211-207
time,* had the conduct of the war in Italy, whilst his
colleague, M. Valerius Lsevinus, brought the war in Sicily
to a close by the conquest of Agrigentum.' After gaining
possession of Salapia, he marched to Samnium, where he
took a few insignificant places, and the Carthaginian
magazines which they contained/
Whilst he was here occupied with operations of little Defeat of
Cn Ful
moment, and apparently paid little attention to Hannibal's ^^^ Cen-
movements, and to acting in concert with the prsetor tuiimlus
Cn. Fulvius Centumalus, who commanded two legions nea.
in Apulia, the latter officer and his army paid dearly for
the negligence and unskilful strategy which again marked
the divided command of the Boman generals. He lay
encamped near Herdonea, a town of Apulia, which, like
Salapia, had joined the Punians after the battle of Cannse.
By the co-operation of the Roman party in the place, he
hoped to gain possession of it. But Hannibal, far away
in Bruttium, had been informed of the peril in which the
town was placed. After a rapid march he appeared
unexpectedly before the Roman camp. By what stratagem
he succeeded in drawing Fulvius from his safe position,
or in forcing him from it, we are not informed. It is not
at all likely that, as Livy relates, the Roman prsetor
voluntarily accepted battle, confident in his own strength.*
By a most extraordinary coincidence, it happened that,
in the same place where, two years before, Hannibal had
* Livy, xxri. 38.
* This is correct, if the consulship of 215 is reckoned, wliich Marcellus
was obliged to lay down immediately after his election, as ' vitio creatus.*
* See above, p. 313.
^ These places — Marmorea and Moles (Livy, zzvii. 1) — are not mentioned
anywhere else.
* Livy, zxvii. 1 : ' Pari audacia Homanus copiis raptim eductis confiixit.'
The reason why Fulvius could not avoid a battle may perhaps be looked for
in the circumstance mentioned by Livy {too, ciL), that the Koman camp was
' nee loco satis tuto posita nee prsesidiis firmata.'
360 ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK defeated the proprsetor Fulvius Placcus, he was now
^ . • / again opposed to a Fulvius. The happy omen which lay
■ in this casual identity of name and place was improved
by Hannibal's genius to lead to a second equally brilliant
victory. The Boman army was utterly routed, the camp
taken, 7,000 men, or, according to another report, 13,000
men, were slain, among them eleven military tribunes
and the prsetor Cn. Fulvius Centumalus himself. It
was a victory worthy to be compared with the great
triumphs of the first three glorious years of the war.
Again it was shown that Hannibal was irresistible in the
field, and again Bome was plunged into mourning, and
people looked anxiously into the future when they re-
flected that not even the loss of Capua had broken
Hannibal's courage or strength, and that he was more
terrible now and in the possession of a larger part of Italy
than after the day of Cannse.
Destpuc- Yet Hannibal was far from overrating his success. He
Heritea ^^^ «»**' ^^ ^pi^ of his victory, he was unable to hold
by Hanni- Herdonca for any long time. Accordingly he punished
with death the leaders of the Soman faction in the town,
who had carried on negotiations with Fulvius. He then
set the town on fire, and removed the inhabitants to
Thurii and Metapontum.* This done, he went in search
of the second Roman army in Samnium, under the com-
mand of the consul M. Claudius Marcellus.
Operations Whether Marcellus might have prevented the defeat of
cdSw '^' Fulvius is a question which we do not venture to decide.
But it is quite evident, even from the scanty and falsified
reports of his alleged heroic exploits, that, after the
disaster, he did not venture, with his consular army of two
legions, to oppose Hannibal. The boastful language with
which Livy introduces these reports seems to indicate that
they were taken from the laudatory speeches preserved in
the family archives. Marcellus, it is said, sent a letter to
Bome, requesting the senate to dismiss all fear, for that
' Livy, xxvii. 1.
THE SECOND PUNIC WAR. 361
he was still the same who after the battle of Cannae had so CHAP,
roughly handled Hannibal; he would at once march against
him, and take care that his joy should be short-lived.* The J^^^
hostile armies met indeed at Numistro, an utterly unknown 211-207
place — perhaps in Lucania^ — and a fierce battle ensued, ^'^'
which, according to Livy, lasted without a decision into the
night. On the following day, it is further reported, Hannibal
did not venture to renew the struggle, so that the Eomans
remained in possession of the field and were able to bum
their dead, whilst Hannibal, under cover of the subsequent
night, withdrew to Apulia, pursued by the Bomans. He
was overtaken near Yenusia, and here several engagements
took place, which were of no great importance, but on the
whole ended favourably for the Eomans.
It is much to be regretted that the account of these
events by Polybius is lost. Yet we are not altogether
deprived of the means of rectifying the palpable boastings
of the annalists whom Livy followed. Frontinus, a military
writer of the first century after Christ, has by chance
preserved an account of the battle of Numistro, from which
we learn that it ended, not with a victory, but with a
defeat of Marcellus.® So barefaced were the lies of the
family panegyrists even at this time, and so greedily and
blindly did the majority of historians, in their national
vanity, adopt every report which tended to glorify the
Eoman arms! The whole success of which, in truth,
Marcellus could boast was, in all likelihood, this — that his
army was spared such a calamity as had befallen Flaccus
and Centamalus. The year passed away without further
military events in Italy. But at sea the Eomans sustained Defeat of
Art 1 'xi- • • J j_» J j» ii • the Roman
fleet with provisions, destined for the garrison flp^t by the
of the citadel of Tarentum, and convoyed by thirty ships Taren-
tines.
> Livy, xxvii. 2 : ' Enndem se, qui post CannenBem pugnam ferocem yictoria
Hannibalem contudisset, ire adversus euro, brevem illi Iseiitiam qua exult et
fiituram.*
• Pliny, Eist Nat, iii. 15.
' Frontinus, Strategem, ii. 2, 6 : ' Hannibal apud Numistroni^m contra Mar-
cellum pugnaturus caras et prseruptas vias obiccit a latere ipsaque loci natura
pro munimento usus clarissimum ducom vicit/
862 ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK of war, was attacked by a Tarentine squadron nnder Demo-
IV.
' krates, and completely defeated.' Yet this event had no
essential influence on the state of things in Tarentum.
The Eoman garrison of the citadel, though pressed very
hard, held out manfully, and by occasional sallies inflicted
considerable loss on the besiegers. We must presume that
provisions were from time to time thrown into the place.
Under these circumstances the Bomans could calmly
maintain their position, whilst the populous town of
Tarentum, whose trade, industry, and agriculture were
paralysed, felt the garrison of the citadel like a thorn in
the flesh.
Pressure of The year 210, as we have seen, had produced no material
the Ro- °" change in the situation of affairs in Italy. The re-conquest
mans. of Salapia and a few insignificant places in Samnium was
amply compensated by the defeats which the Romans sus-
tained by land and sea. Hannibal, though driven out of
Campania, was still master of southern Italy. The Romans
had indeed put two legions less into the field — twenty-one
instead of twenty-three — but a permanent reduction of
the burdens of war was out of the question as long as
Hannibal held his ground in Italy unconquered and
threatening as before. The war had now lasted for eight
years. The exhaustion of Italy became visibly greater.
All available measures had already been taken to procure
money and men. The foremost senators now set the
example of contributing their gold and silver as a voluntary
loan for the purpose of equipping and manning a new
fleet.^ At length the government appropriated a reserve
fund of 4,000 pounds of gold, which had in better times
been laid by for the last necessities of the state.'
' Livy, xxTiii. 39. * Iiivy* xxvi. 35.
* Livy, xxvrii. 10. The 'aarum Ticesimarum * consisted of the proceeds of a
tax of five per cent, of the value of manumitted slaves, which had been
imposed 357 B.C., in an eltraordinarj manner, bj a popular vote, according to
tribes in the camp before Sutrium. That the proceeds of this tax vrere
intended to be used for the formation of a reserve fund was not mentioned
previously, but comes out casually on the present occasion. There is some*
thing strange, not to say mysterious, about the whole story. Again, there ia
THE SECOND PUNIC WAE. 868
Ab long as the undaunted spirit of Boman pride and CHAP,
determination animated the state, there was hope that all
the great sacrifices had not been made in vain. Up to ]^'™
the present moment this spirit had stood all tests. The 211-207
defection of several of the allies seemed only to have the ^'^'
effect of uniting the others more firmly to Eome, espe- J^^"^ ^^
cially the Roman citizens themselves and the Latins, who Latin colo-
on all occasions had shown themselves as brave and "onti^ute
patriotic as the genuine Romans. But now, in the year men and
209, when the consuls called upon the Latins to furnish tho"war°'
more troops and money, the delegates of twelve Latin
colonies formally declared that their resources were com-
pletely exhausted, and that they were unable to comply
with the request. This declaration was no less unexpected
than alarming. When the consuls made their report to
the senate of the refusal of the twelve colonies, and added
that no arguments and exhortations had the least effect
upon the delegates, then the boldest men in that stubborn
assembly began to tremble, and those who had not de-
spaired after the battle of Oannse almost resigned them-
selves to the inevitable downfall of the commonwealth.
How was it possible that Rome should be saved if the
remaining colonies and allies should follow the example
of the twelve, and if all Italy should conspire to abandon
Rome in this hour of need ?*
The fate of Rome was trembling in the balance. Serions-
Hannibal's calculations had so far proved correct that ^essofthe
^ , crisis.
now even the Roman senate feared that his plan must be
realised. The fabric of Roman power had not, it is true,
yielded to one blow, nor even to repeated blows ; but the
miseries of a war protracted through so many years had
graduaUy undermined the foundations on which it rested,
and the moment seemed approaching when it would
collapse with a sudden crash.
Everything depended on the attitude which the '
no mention of the Gaulish ransom, which Camilliis is reported to have re-
captured and deposited on the Capitol — a certain proof that no such sum
existed. See vol. i. p. 273. ' Li^y. zxvii. 9.
364 ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK remaining eighteen Latin colonies would assume. ' If
they followed the example of the twelve, it was clear that
Fidelity of ^^ further reliance could be placed on the other allies, and
the re- Eome would be compelled to sue for peace. But forfcim-
eighteen ately this humiliation was not in store for her. Marcus
^lonies Sextilius of PregellsB declared, in the name of the other
colonies, that thej were ready to furnish not only their
customary and legal contingent of soldiers, but even a
greater number, if necessary ; and that at the same time
they were not wanting in means, and still less in the will,
to execute any other order of the Soman people.* The
deputies of the eighteen colonies were introduced into the
senate by the consuls, and received the thanks of that
venerable assembly. The Soman people formally ratified
the decree of the senate and added its own thanks ; and
indeed never had any people more cause for gratitude, and
never was the expression of public thanks more amply
deserved than by the eighteen faithful colonies. Their
firmness saved Rome, if not from utter destruction (for no
doubt Hannibal would now, as after the battle of Cannse,
have been ready to grant peace on equitable terms),
at any rate from the loss of her commanding position in
Italy and in the world. The names of the eighteen
colonies deserved to be engraved in golden letters on the
Capitol. They were Signia, Norba, and Saticula, three of
the original cities of old Latium; Pregellse, on the river
Liris, the apple of discord in the second Samnite war;
Luceria and Venusia, in Apulia; Brundusium, Hadria,
Firmum, and Ariminum, on the east coast; Pontise, Psestum,
and Cosa, on the western sea ; Beneventum, ^semia, and
Spoletium, in the mountainous district of the interior; and,
lastly, Placentia and Cremona on the Po, the most recent
colonial foundations, which since Hannibal's appearance in
Italy had been in constant danger, and had bravely and suc-
cessfully resisted all attacks. What caused the division
among the thirty Latin colonies is not reported by our
' Li\7, zxyii. 10.
THE SECOND PUNIC WAR.
365
informants, nor are we able to guess. We find that, on
the whole, it was the older colonies, lying nearer to Borne,
which refused further service. These were Ardea, Nepete,
Sutrium, Alba, Carseoli, Sora, Suessa, Circeii, Setia, Cales,
Namia, and Interamna. Is it possible that, because thej
were nearer to the capital, more services had been required
of them during the war? or did they feel more keenly than
the more distant colonies their exclusion from the full
Boman franchise ? We remember that, in the third year
of the war, Spurius Carvilius proposed in the senate to
admit members to that body from the Latin colonies*
This wise proposal had been rejected with Boman
haughtiness and even indignation. It is not improbable
that Spurius Carvilius, before he recommended the admis-
sion of Latins into the Boman senate, had convinced
himself that the colonists also felt themselves entitled to
a privilege which they regarded as their right. Perhaps
if his counsel had been taken, the Bomans would never
have heard of a refusal of their allies to bear their share
of the burdens of the war. But, in the total absence of
direct evidence, we cannot be sure that any such dis-
content caused the disobedience of the twelve colonies.
The reason which Livy assigns seems inadequate. He
relates' that the remnants of the routed legions of Cannse
and Herdonea were punished for their bad behaviour by
being sent to Sicily and condemned to serv.e to the end of
the war without pay, under conditions that were onerous
and degrading. The majority of these troops, says Livy,
consisted of Latins; and as Borne called for new efforts
and sacrifices year after year, for more soldiers and more
money, whilst she kept the veterans in Sicily, the dis-
content of the colonists swelled to positive resistance.
The severity, or rather the cruelty, of Borne towards the
unfortunate survivors of the defeated armies may well
have called forth bitter feelings ; yet, as Borne treated her
own citizens with the same severity as the Latins, and, as
CHAP.
vni.
— — « — '
Fifth
Period,
21 1-207
B.C.
' Liry, zzyii. 9.
866 KOMAN mSTORY.
BOOK far as we know, made no difference among the varions
^ — r^ — ' Latin contingents, we fail to discover why twelve colonies
out of thirty considered themselves more especially ill-
treated and called npon to remonstrate.
The thanks of the senate and the Roman people awarded
to the staunch and faithful eighteen colonies was the only
reproof which at present was addressed to the remon-
strances of the others. With wise moderation Borne
refirained from punishing them. The negotiations with
them were broken off. Their delegates received no answer
of any kind, and left Borne with the painful feeling that
they had indeed carried their point, but that they had done
so at the risk of a severe retaliation at some future time,
which could be averted only by speedy repentance and
redoubled zeal in the service of Bome.
Roman The fiTcat obicct of the campaimi in Italy was now the
prepara- " "^ , .
tioDs for re-conquest of Tarentum. Not less than six legions were
conquest of ^^®°^®^ nccessary to accomplish this end, viz., the armies
Tarentum. of the two consuls of 209 — Q. Fabius Maximus and Q. Ful-
vius Flaccus — and a third army of equal strength under
Marcellus. Besides these forces there was in Bruttium a
body of 8,000 men, mostly irregular troops, a motley band
of Bruttian deserters, discharged soldiers, and marauders,
who, after the ending of the war in Sicily, had been col-
lected there by tJie consul Valerius Lsevinus and sent into
Italy to be let loose upon the allies of Hannibal. There
were, therefore, altogether not less than 70,000 men in the
south of Italy, a force sufi&cient to crush by its mere weight
any other enemy of the numerical strength of the Cartha-
ginian army. But, even with this vast superiority of
strength, the Boman generals were far from trying to
bring on a decisive battle. The events of the past year
had too much revived the memory of Cannse, and no
Boman as yet ventured to run the risk of a like disaster.
The plan of the consuls accordingly was to avoid pitched
battles, and to retake one by one the fortified places which
had been lost — a process by which Hannibal would be con-
fined more and more within a contracted territory. This
THE SECOND PUNIC WAE. 367
was the plan which had been snccessfdlly adopted after CHAP.
Cann83. Every deviation from it had proved dangerous. ^_ , '^
It was a slow process ; but, owing to the preponderance JF*™
of the Romans in material resources and te their 211-207
dogged perseverance, it was sure in the end to lead to ^'^'
victory.
Whilst the consul Q. Fabius Maximus was watching Opemtiong
Tarentum, his colleague Fulvius and the pro-consul Mar- ^^J Mm*
cellus had orders to occupy Hannibal elsewhere. Fulvius cellus.
marched through the country of the Hirpinians, and took
a number of fortified places, the inhabitants of which
made their peace with Borne by delivering up the Punic
garrisons. Marcellus, exhibiting more courage than dis-
cretion, ventured to advance against Hannibal from
Yenusia ; but he was so badly handled in a series of small
engagements that he was obliged to take refuge in
Yenusia, and so crippled that he was unable to undertake
anything for the remainder of the year."
Whilst Hannibal was confronting Marcellus in Apulia, Capture of
a Boman force of 8,000 men had issued from Bhegium to ^ ^
man army
^ This is the bare truth, which all the rhetorical skill of Livy (xxrii. 12-14)
and Plutarch {Marcdl. 25) cannot hide. According to the narrative of the
annalists, Marcellus fought three times with Hannibal. The first battle waa
undecided ; in the second he was defeated ; on the day following he was
Tictorious, but sustained such a heavy loss in killed and wounded that he
could not pursue Hannibal, but returned to Yenusia. A victory on the day
after a defeat — ^surely the most difficult and the most glorious feat of arms,
especially in a war with Hannibal — would have been an event in the military
annals of Rome which would have secured for Marcellus not only the grateful
acknowledgment of his countrymen, but immortal fame. But, instead of this,
we find (Livy, xxvii. 20) that Marcellus was forthwith accused in Home, by the
tribune C. Publicius Bibulus, of incompetency in the management of the war,
and that he found it necessary to hasten from Venusia to Borne, in order to
justify himself, and to prevent the passing of a vote of censure, by which he
was to be deprived of his command. Bibulus asserted (c. 21) that his army
was twice defeated, and was now passing the summer in inactivity at Yenusia.
Marcellus had so much influence in- Eome that he succeeded in clearing
himself of the charge, and even secured his election for the consulship of the
ensuing year (208) ; nevertheless it is clear that the charge would not have
been preferred if he had been victorious against Hannibal. We shall again
have occasion to point to the impurity of the sources from which the reports
of the exploits of Marcellus have been drawn.
Romans.
868 ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK attack the city of Caulonia in Bruttium.* As Frederick the
' r^ — ' Great, in the eventful year 1 756, turned with the rapidity of
before lightning from one defeated enemy to defeat another, so
Caiiionia Hannibal suddenly appeared before Caulonia, and, after a
bai. ^ short resistance, captured the whole of the besieging army.
This done, he immediately hastened towards Tarentum,
which he hoped would hold out against Fabius Maximus
until he had repulsed the other hostile forces.
Taren^mn ^ Marching night and day, he reached Metapontum, where
to the he received the mournful intelligence that Tarentum had
been betrayed into the hands of the Eomans, Fabius had
attacked Tarentum on the land side with great vehemence,
but without success. The Tarentines, knowing full well
what they had to expect from Eome if their town should
be retaken, defended it with desperate courage. A Panic
garrison under Carthalo, strengthened by a detachment of
Bruttians, shared the defence with the citizens. There
was no prospect of taking the town by force, and any day
a Punic fleet or Hannibal's army might be expected before
the town to raise the siege. Under these circumstances
the cautious old Fabius fcried the same arts by which two
years before Hannibal had gained Tarentum, The oflicer
in command of the Bruttians was bribed to let the Bomans
secretly into the town. Fabius ordered a general night-
attack on Tarentum from the citadel, the inner harbour,
and the open sea, whilst on the land side, in the east of
the town, where the Bruttians were stationed, he waited for
the signal agreed upon. While the attention of the
besieged was directed to the three parts of the town
which were apparently most in danger, the Bruttians
> One half of this army consisted of the criminalp, marauders, and robbers
-whom Leevinus had in the preceding year collected in Sicily, and sent over to
Bruttium. See Livy, zzvi. 40: 'Quatuor milia hominum erant, mizti ex
omni cullavione exules, obsrati, capitalia ausi plerique . . . per latrocinia et
rapinam tole'^ntes vitam. Hos ueque relinquere LseTinus in insula tarn
primum nova pace coalescente velut materiam novandis rebus satis tutum mtus
est, ot Kheginis usui futuri erant ad populandum Bruttium agrum, adsuetam
latrociniis quscrentibus manum.' Compare Pulybius, ix. 27. This highly
characteristic passage shows how extensively and systematically the banditti
war was carried on.
THE SECOND PUNIC WAR.
869
opened a gate ; the Eomans nislied in, and now, after a
short and ineffectual resistance of the Tarentines, followed
the promiscuous massacre which usually accompanied the
taking of a hostile town by Eoman troops.* The victors
put to the sword not only those who still resisted,
like Niko, the leader of the treason by which Tarentum
had fallen into the hands of Hannibal two years before,
and Demokrates, the brave commander of the Tarentine
fleet, so recently victorious over that of the Bomans,
but also Carthalo, the commander of the Punic garrison,
who had laid down his arms and asked for quarter. In
fact they slew all whom they met, even the Bruttians who
had let them into the town, either, as Livy observes, by
mistake, or from old national hatred, or in order to make
it appear that Tarentum was taken by force, and not by
treason.^ The captured town was then given up to be
plundered. Thirty thousand Tarentines were sold as slaves
for the benefit of the Eoman treasury.' The quantity of
statues, pictures, and other works of art almost equalled the
booty of Syracuse. All was sent to Rome ; only a colossal
statue of Jupiter, the removal and transport of which
proved too difficult, was left by the generous Fabius. He
would not, he said, deprive the Tarentines of their patron
deities, whose wrath they had experienced.*
Thus Tarentum, which was, after Oapua, the most im-
portant of the Italian cities that had joined Carthage,
was again reduced to subjection. The limits were contract-
ing more and more within which Hannibal could range
freely. The whole of Campania, Samnium, and Lucania,
almost all Apulia, were lost. Even the Bruttians, the only
* See above, p. 354.
' Compare Plutarch, Fabius, 22.
* Possibly the slaves found in Tarentum are included in this number.
* According to Livy*s description (xxvii. 16), Pabius took only smaller
statues and pictures, but no colossus. But Plutarch (FalnuSf 22) tells us that
he caused a colossal statue of Hercules to be transported to Home, and to be
put up on the Capitol. This statement is confirmed by Pliny (HUt, Ik'at.
zzxiv. 7), who adds that he left untouched a colossus of Jupiter, the vork of
Lysippus, on account of its size and the difficulty of moving it. Compare
vol. i. p. 5G3, note 3.
VOL. IX. B B
CHAP.
VUI.
t — -*
Fifth
Pebiod,
211-207
B.C.
Position of
HanniVMl
after the
fall of
Tarentum.
870 ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK one of the Italian races that had not yet made their peace
<- / ^. with Rome, began to waver in their fidelity to him.
Tarentum had been betrayed to the Eomans by the Bruttian
corps of the garrison ; and the tempting offers of rulvius,
who promised pardon for the revolt, were readily listened
to by several chiefs of this half-barbarons people.* Rhe-
gium, the important maritime town which kept open
the communication with Sicily, and, in conjunction with
Messana, closed the straits to the Carthaginian ships, had
always remained in the possession of the Romans. The
impoverished Greek towns and the narrow strip of land
from Lucania to Sicily were all that was left to Hannibal
of the promising acquisitions made after the first few
brilliant campaigns. Pushed back into this comer, like
the Duke of Wellington behind the lines of Torres Vedras,
the unconquered and undaunted Hannibal waited for the
moment when, in conjunction with his brother, whom he
expected from Spain, he could with renewed vigour assail
Rome and force her to make peace.
Fifth The taking of Tarentum at the same time with the fiaJl
of MftTCci- ^^ ^^^ Carthage was a compensation for the efforts and
lu»- . losses of the year 209. The remainder of this year passed
^without any further military events, and for the succeeding
year, as has been already stated, MarceUus was for the
fifth time raised to the consulship. His colleague was T.
Quinctius Crispinus, one of the many Roman nobles whose
names call forth no distinct pictures in our imagination,
because they mark nothing but the average mediocrity of
their class. The campaign of this year had for its object,
as it appears, the re-conquest of Locri, the most important
of the towns still in Hannibal's possession. The Romans
steadily adhered to their plan of avoiding battles as much
as possible, and of depriving the enemy of his means for
continuing the war in Italy by taking from him the sup-
port of fortified places. Seven legions and a fleet were
destined to operate for this end in the south of Italy.
* Livy, xxvii. 15.
THE SECOND PUNIC WAR. 871
Whilst the two consuls, with two consular armies, covered CHAP,
in the rear by a legion in Campania, occupied Hannibal, ^ _ } ^
Q. Claudius, who commanded two legions in Tarentum, was ^'"'h
ordered to advance on Locri by land, and L. Cincius was 211-207
to sail from Sicily with a fleet and attack Locri from the ^^*
sea side. Hannibal, who was opposing the combined armies
of the consuls, was informed of the march of the Boman
army along the coast from Tarentum to Locri. He sur-
prised it in the neighbourhood of Petelia and inflicted a
severe defeat, killing several thousands and driving the
remainder in a disorderly flight back to Tarentum.*
Thus, for the present, Locri was out of danger, and Dw^th of
Hannibal was at leisure to turn against the two consuls, "^
whom he hoped to force to accept a decisive battle. But
MarceUus and Crispinus were resolved to be cautious.
They were not going to allow Hannibal to try one of his
stratagems and to catch them in a trap, as he had so
often done with less experienced or less carefdl opponents.
The sexagenarian MarceUus himself headed a recon-
naissance, accompanied by his colleague, his son, a number
of officers, and a few hundred horsemen, to explore the
country between the Boman and the Carthaginian camps.
On this expedition the brave old soldier met his death.
From the wooded recesses of the hills in front and in the
flank, Numidian horsemen rushed suddenly forward. In
a moment the consuls' escort were cut down or scattered ;
Crispinus and the young MarceUus escaped, severely
wounded, and MarceUus feU fighting like a brave trooper,
closing his long life in a manner which, though it might
befit a common soldier, was hardly worthy of a statesman
and a general. His magnanimous enemy honoured his
body with a decent funeral, and sent the ashes to his son.
If we calmly examine what is reported of the virtues of Chaniot«T
MarceUus, we shaU come to the conclusion that he is one of Marcel^
of those men who are praised far beyond their merits. ^^•
This is caused partly by the circumstance that, owing to
* Livy, xxvii. 26.
» 11 2
372 RO:VIAN HISTORY.
BOOK the scarcity of men of eminent abilities, the Soman
^^ historians were almost driven to speak in high praise of
men scarcely raised above mediocrity, because otherwise
they would have had nobody to compare with the great
heroes and statesmen of Greece, by whose greatness thej
loved to measure their own. If it happened that a Eoman
possessed a little more than the average amount of national
virtues — if by family connexions, noble birth, and wealth
he was marked out for the high offices of state, and if he
was fortunate enough to find on the occasion of his funeral
a sufiiciently skilful and not too bashful panegyrist, his
fame was secured for ever. All these favourable circum-
stances were combined in the case of Marcellus. He was
a brave soldier, a firm intrepid patriot, and an unflinchiug
enemy of the enemies of Some. But to extol him as an
eminent general, or even as a worthy opponent of Hannibal,
argues want of judgment and personal or national par-
tiality. He was not much better than most of the other
Boman generals of his time. The reports of his victories
over Hannibal are one and all fictitious. Thus much is
evident from what has been said before, for the tissue
of falsehood is after all so thin that it covers the truth
but imperfectly ; but it can also be proved from the state-
ment of Polybius. This historian says, evidently for the
purpose of refuting assertions current in his own time,
that Marcellus never once conquered Hannibal.^ After
such emphatic evidence as this, we are allowing a great
deal if we admit that, perhaps once, or even on several
occasions, Marcellus succeeded in thwarting the plaus of
Hannibal, by beating oflF attacks or withdrawing from a
conflict without the total rout of his army. Something of
this sort must have supplied the materials for exaggera-
tions for which there may have been some pretext or
excuse. Accordingly, if Cicero calls Marcellus fiery and
' Plutarch (compare Pelopid. et Marcdl. 1): Ayvi$eaf 9h MdpKtWos, &t ol
fiiy X€p4 UoK^fiiop Xiyova-ij ov9k fijraj Mmia'fy. Compare Cornelias Nepos,
Hannib. 6 : ' Quamdia in Italia fuit (Hannibal) nemo ei in acie restitit, nemo
adversus eum post Cannensem pugnam in campo castra posuit.*
B.C.
THE SECOND PUNIC WAR. 373
dashing,^ he no doubt speaks the truth ; but if he extols CHAP,
his clemency towards the conquered Sjracusans, it is clear ^,_ ^ •_ ^
that he only employs him as a foil for the purpose of ^""
placing in a more glaring light the horrible Tillauy of 211-207
Verres.* How Marcellus treated the Sicilians we learn
from the events which followed the capture of Syracuse.
He waS; in truth, a merciless destroyer and insatiably
greedy. When the Sicilians heard that, in the year 210,
he was again to take the command in their island, they
were distracted with terror and despair, and declared, in
Borne, that it would be better for them if the sea were to
swallow them up, or if the fiery lava of Mount ^tna were
to cover the land ; they assured the senate that they would
much rather leave their native country than dwell in it
for anytime under the tyranny of Marcellus.* So vigorous
and so just was the protest of the Sicilians that Marcellus
was obliged to exchange provinces with his colleague
Valerius Lsevinus, and to take the command in Italy
instead of Sicily, which had been awarded to him by lot.
That he exceeded the limits of Boman severity is evident
from the decree of the senate, which, though it does not
exactly censure his proceedings in Syracuse, or annul the
arrangements which he had made, yet enjoined his
successor Lsevinus to provide for the welfare of Syracuse,
as far as the interest of the republic allowed.^ The old
Fabius Maximus was surely a genuine Eoman, but he
a<;ted very differently from Marcellus. He warmly
' Cicero, De Repuh. y. 8 : * acer et pngnax/
* Cicero, Verr, ii. 2, 2. Compare aboTe, p. 312, note 3.
■ Liyy, xxtI. 29.
' * Livy, zxtI. 32 : ' Ut quod sine iactnra rei publicse 6eri posset, fortunis
eins civitatis consoleret.' It appears, hoirever, that the wretched people of
Syracuse did not gain much by this humane injunction. For when Scipio
came to Syracuse in 205 b.c., he was assiduous in protecting them from the
continued rapacity of indiridual Romans, to which they had been exposed.
LiTy, zzix. 1 : *■ Orseci res a quibnsdnm Italici generis eadom ri, qua per belluni
cfperant, retinentibus concessas sibi a senatu repetebant. Scipio omnium
primum ratus tueri publicam fidem, partim edicto partim iudiciis etiam in
pertinaces ad obtinendam iniuriam redditis suas res Syracusanis restituit/ We
may perhaps doubt if this put an end to the oppression of Syracusans l>y
Italians.
374 BOMAN HISTORY.
BOOK pleaded in the senate in favour of the Tarentiiies whom
^^ — r^ — f he had reduced, and he shielded them from the rapacitj
and revenge of men who, like Marcellus, delighted in
venting their evil passions on helpless foes.* We can see
clearly that public opinion no longer declared it to be a
Boman virtue to treat conquered enemies with excessive
severiiy, that feelings of humanity began to influence the
more refined minds, and that the panegyrists (those, for
example, of the Scipios) found it necessary to throw over
their heroes the colour of kindliness and clemency.'
Source of It would be interesting to know from what source the
geratioM "^^^ exaggerations and fictions are derived which have
in the the praises of Marcellus for their object. Perhaps we
Haicellus. shall not go wrong in supposing that their fountain-head
was the funeral speech delivered, according to Livy, by the
son of Marcellus.' This document seems, however, not to
have met with unconditional credence at first, as may be
inferred from the quoted declaration of Polybius, and ftt)m
Livy himself.^ But when the Emperor Augustus had
selected M. Claudius Marcellus, the descendant of the con-
queror of Syracuse, for the husband of his daughter Julia,
a new period of glorification began for the family of the
Marcelli. A careful search was now made fyr^ everything
that redounded to the ppi^ise of the ancestors of the young
man in the glorious times of the older republic. Augustus
himself composed an historical work on this subject,^ and
we cannot fail to perceive that Livy wrote under the in-
fluence of the Augustan court. He treats Marcellus as a
favourite hero, and even in Plutarch we can trace this
preference accorded to Marcellus. If we deduct all that
family conceit and national pride have invented about
' Livy, xxvii. 25. Compare also the proceedings of Cornelius Cethegns in
Sicily, who supported the accusations directed against Marcellus.
' Mommsen (Bim, Gesch, i. 621 ; English translation, ii. 140) has a much
higher opinion of Marcellus than we can subscribe to.
■ LiTy, xxvii. 27.
* According to Livy (xxvii. 27), Coelius rejected the evidence of young
Marcellus.
* Plutarch, Marcdl, 30. Id. comparatio Velojp. ei MarceU, 1.
THE SECOND PUNIC WAR. 375
Marcellus, there remains^ indeed^ the image of a genuine CHAP.
Eoman of the old type, of an intrepid soldier, and an ' -
energetic officer ; bnt the parallel between Marcellus and ^^™,
Felopidas seems inappropriate, and all comparison between 211-207
him and Hannibal is absnrd.
The death of Marcellus and that of his colleague Oris- Raising of
pinus, who very soon after died of his wounds, appears to. l^jS!^^ ^
have paralysed the action of the two consular armies for
the whole of the campaign, though they had remained
intact when their leaders were cut oflPl It is very strange
that the Eoman people, which year after year found new
commanders-in-chief, now allowed four legions to remain
inactive for at least half a year because both consuls had
by chance fallen in the field. If it be indeed true, as is
related, that the armies suffered no further losses — m other
words, that after the death of Marcellus they were not
attacked and beaten by Hannibal — the strategy of the
Bomans appears in a sorry light. One of the two armies
retired to Yenusia, the other even as far as Campania, and
they left the Carthaginian general at liberty to put an end
to the siege of Locri, which had been again undertaken.
The pr»tor Lucius Cincius had obtained from Sicily a
great quantity of engines necessary for a siege, and had
attacked Locri vigorously, both by land and sea. Already
the Punic garrison was much reduced, and despaired of
being able to hold the town much longer, when Hannibal's
Numidians showed themselves in the neighbourhood and
encouraged the garrison to make a sally. Attacked in
front and rear, the Bomans soon gave way, left all their
siege engines behind, and took refuge on board their
ships. Locri was saved by the mere arrival of Hannibal.^
Through the failure of the attack on Locri, the campaign Brospecu
of 208 proved entirely fruitless to the Eoznans, and all tts..
further military proceedings were suspended. For the
first time since the establishment of the republic both
consuls had fallen in battle. The commonwealth was
' Livv, xxrii. 28,
376 ROMAN HISTORr.
BOOK bereaved, and religiotis fears and scruples no doubt con-
V- — ^ — ' tributed to paralyse military action for the time. It was
most fortunate for Bome that, in consequence of her in-
defatigable perseverance and gigantic efforts, SLannibal 1
had been pushed into the defensive, and was no longer
able to carry on the war on a large scale. For at this very
time the signs of discontent and disobedience multiplied
among the subjects of Bome in Italy, whilst the news that
arrived from Spain, Massilia, Africa, and Sicily left little
doubt that the time had come at last when the long pre-
pared expedition of Hasdrubal from Spain into Italy
might be looked for as imminent. It seemed as if the
war, which had now lasted ten years, instead of gradually
flagging and drawing to a close was to begin afresh with
renewed vigour.
piFcontent Ti^g refusal of the twelve Latin colonies to bear any
longer the burdens of the war could not fail to produce an
effect on the other allies of Bome. Soon after there
appeared most alarming signs of growing discontent in
Etruria. This country had hitherto been almost exempt
from the immediate calamities of war. Hannibal, it is
true, had in his first campaign touched a part of Etruria,
and had on Etruscan soil fought the battle of Thrasymenus.
But, as he wished to conciliate the allies of Bome and to
appear as their friend, he had probably spared the country
as much as possible. In the succeeding years the theatre
of war had been shifted to the south of Italy, and whilst
Apulia, Lucania, Campania, and, above all, Bruttium were
exposed to all the horrors of war, and whilst the African,
Spanish, and Gaulish barbarians in Hannibal's army pene-
trated with fire and sword into the interior of Samnium and
Latium, nay even to the very gates of Bome, Etruria had
heard the storm rage at a distance, and had, almost without
interruption, enjoyed practically the blessings of peace. The
countryman had securely tilled his field, the shepherd had
tended his flock, the artisan and the tradesman had each
plied his craft. In its fidelity to Bome, Etruria had hitherto
remained unshaken. It was an Etruscan cohort from
.^\
THE SECOND PUNIC WAE.
377
Perusia, which, side by side witii one from Pneneste, had
heroically resisted the Carthaginians in the protracted
siege of Casilinnm,^ Without any donbt the Etruscans had
supplied their full contingents to all the armies and fleets of
the Bomans, and nothing but the customary injustice of
the Boman annalists has ignored this co-operation of their
allies.^ Financially, too, the rich towns of Etruria had
helped to bear the burdens of the war. Of especial im-
portance were the supplies of grain that came from this
country. We cannot suppose that the Eoman treasury
was in a condition to pay for this grain in cash, and
probably the price was fixed very low, in the interest of
the state. Thus it was that Etruria also began to feel the
pressure of the war ; and the desire for peace showed itself
naturally in an unwillingness to comply with farther
demands on the part of Eome. As early as 212 b.o. the
first symptoms of discontent had become apparent. On
that occasion a Boman army was sent to Etruria to keep
the country in check.' Three years later the agitation
became much more critical. It showed itself especially in
Arretium, a town which at one time was reputed as one
of the foremost of the Etruscan people,^ and which, as an
old friend and ally of Bome,^ might consider itself entitled
to be treated with some degree of preference and indul-
gence. Marcellus, who, immediately after his election to the
consulship of 208 B.C., was sent to Arretium, succeeded for
the moment in quieting the people ; but when he had set out
on his campaign in the south of the peninsula, where he
was soon afterwards killed in ambush, the Etruscans again
became troublesome, and the senate now dispatched 0.
Terentius Varro, the consul of 216, with military authority,
to Arretium. Varro occupied the town with a Boman
legion, and required hostages from the Arretine senate.
Finding that the senators hesitated to comply with his
CHAP,
vin.
Fifth
PXBIGD,
211-207
' See above, p. 265.
■ LJTy, xxT. 3.
• LiTy, IX 82.
» See vol. i. p. 276.
* Livy, ix. 37 ; x. 37.
878
ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK
IV.
Events in
Spain.
order^ he placed sentinels at the gates and along the
walls^ to prevent anybody leaving the place. Nevertheless
seven of the most eminent men escaped with tlxeir
fitmilies. The property of the fiigitives was forthwith
confiscated, and one hundred and twenty hostages, taken
from the families of the remaining senators, were sent
to Borne. The unsatisfactory state of Etruria seemed,
however, to require a better guarantee than a few hostages
from a single town. The senate therefore dispatched a
legion to back the measures which were everywhere taken
for keeping the country in subjection and for crushing in
the bud every attempt at revolution.^
This growing discontent among a considerable portion
of the most faithful and valuable allies caused the more
anxiety in Bome as about the same time disquieting news
arrived of the movements of Hasdrubal. As early as
two years before (in 210 b.o.) the admiral M. Valerius
Messala had sailed from Sicily with fifty vessels to Africa,
to obtain accurate information about the plans and pre-
parations of the Carthaginians. He returned after an
absence of thiirteen days to Lilybeeum, and reported that
the CarthagiBians were making armaments on a large
scale to increase Hasdrubal's army in Spain and to carry
out at last the plan of sending him with a strong force
across the Alps to Italy .^ This news was confirmed by the
Carthaginian senators taken prisoners by Scipio at New
Carthage,' who, as commissioners of the Carthaginian
government, were necessarily well informed of the plan of
war and of the progress of the armaments in Carthage.^
It was now of the utmost importance, just as in the
beginning of the war, to detain Hasdrubal in Spain ;' and
after the decided progress which the Boman arms had
made in Spain during the last year, after the conquest of
' lavy, zzvii. 21. ' Livy, zzvii. 6.
• See p. 366. * Livy, xxrii. 7.
* This was probably the order of the senate which Leelius conveyed to
Scipio (Polybius, x. 37i § 6). Compare Vincke, Ikr zvmte funische Krieg
p. 312.
THE SECOND PUNIC WAK.
379
CHAP.
vin.
" ■ »
Fifth
Pbriod
211-207
B.C.
New Carthage and the revolt of numerous Spanish peoples
from the Carthagmians, this appeared a comparatiTely
easy task for so enterprising a general as Scipio, He had
been enabled, bj means of the hostages found in New
Carthage^ to gain the friendship of many Spanish chiefs,
among whom Indibilis and Mandonius are especiallj
mentioned as the most powerftil and hitherto most faith-
ful allies of Carthage.^ After such results it seems strange
that Scipio remained inactive for almost a whole year
before he thought of moving southwards from Tarraco.
Where the three Carthaginian generals were during all
this time, and what they did, we do not know.* All the
events that took place in Spain during the whole war are
hidden in such obscurity that, by comparison with them,
the campaigns in Italy and Sicily appear as in the clear
light of historical truth. The Bomans were so ignorant
of the geography of Spain, the distance of that country
from Eome was so great, and the intercourse so limited,
that fancy ranged freely in all the narratives of Spanish
affairs.
We have already seen, on a former occasion,* how the Battle of
annalists made use of this circumstance, and we have now much of
again an opportunity for noticing the same thing. They HaadmbaL
reported that Scipio encountered Hasdrubal at Bsecula,
a place situated probably between the Beetis (Guadalquivir)
and the Anas (Guadiana), and defeated him with a loss of
20,000 men.* One might suppose that such a decisive
victory as this would have led to the most important
results, and would at any rate have paralysed all frirther
enterprises of Hasdrubal; but we find that Hasdrubal was
able immediately after this battle to carry into execution
the plan which had been delayed by adverse circumstances
' Liry, zzvii. 17.
' What is related of their want of agreement (Polybins, x. Z7, § 2) seems
to be a vagne and unfounded report, and is contradicted by the narrative of
the arrangements which, according to Liry (zzrii. 20), they concerted among
themselves for the continuation of the war upon a common plan.
* See above, pp. 314, 817.
* Livy, zxvii. 18, 19. Polybius, x. 39.
380 ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK for eight years. From the battle-field he inarched unpnr-
/ . sued, witii his defeated and crippled army (if Eoman ac-
counts are to be trusted), through the centre of the penin-
sula, crossed the Pyrenees by one of the western passes,'
and had actually reached Gaul, while Scipio, in total igno-
rance of his movements, was in hopes that he could stop
his march somewhere between the Ebro and the Pyrenees,
on the road which Hannibal had taken ten years before.
It is hard to understand how, under such circumstances,
the battle at Bsecula can hare resulted in a Eoman
victory. Perhaps it was only an insignificant encounter
of the Carthaginian rear-guard with the Eoman legions,
which, afber their usual fashion, the Eoman annalists mag-
nified into a great battle and glorious victory.* Anyhow
the strategic success was entirely on the side of the
Carthaginians, and Scipio had to confess that he was not
equal to the task which he had undertaken ; it was his
fault that Italy was exposed to a new invasion, and that
on Italian soil a struggle was renewed on whose doubtful
issue depended not only the supremacy but the very
existence of Eome.'
' Appian, vi. 28.
• According to Polybius (x. 39, § 7), Hasdrubal broke ofF the fight (t^
^vX'^y^X*^^ M^XP^ "^^^ ^ffX^"^^ ^Xir/8o5 &irc8oic(fia<rf ), sent forward his elephants
and bis military chest, and marched northwards. According to Livy (xxvii. 19),
Hasdrubal had sent on the elephants and the money before the battle, and
was therefore already on his march, in which he was not interrupted by the
Romans. We can hardly help being reminded of the encounter between the
Roman and the Carthaginian cavalry on the Rhone in 218 b.c. It appears
that on both occasions the Carthaginian generals avoided a serious engage-
ment, which would have interrupted their march. The two victories of the
father and the son have a striking family likeness.
■ The panegyrists of Scipio explained this in the following manner (Livy,
xx\di. 20): The Carthaginians despaired of successfully encountering Scipio
in Spain on account of the influence he exercised over the minds of the
Spaniards ; they saw that it was absolutely necessary to shift the scene of the
war either to the uttermost parts, near the ocean, which yet knew not the
Romans ('ignaram adhuc Romanorum'), or else to Italy, in order that Hasdi-ubul
might be able to withdraw his soldiers from beyond the magic circle of
Scipio's name {* ut Hispanos omnes procul ob nomine Scipionis ex Hispania
abduceret '). Thus the expedition to Italy, which was part of the original
plan of the Carthaginians, and which the Romans had so long tried to baffle,
is represented as a csisual expedient, adopted by Hasdrubal Wcause Scipio's
THE SECOND PUNIC VfAIL 881
In IkaJy the approaching danger called forth the most CHAP,
serious apprehensions.^ The combined assault of the two /^^'^
sons of Hamilcar on Italian soil, which the senate had Fifth
been so anxious to elude, was now imminent. The 211-207
military history of the preceding year was not calculated ®*^*
to inspire much confidence- The siege of Locri had failed. ^"^^^ ^^
The consuls with their combined armies had not been able
to keep Hannibal in check, and both had actually fallen.
Their legions had retired to the shelter of fortified places,
and Hannibal was undisputed master of Bruttium and
Apulia. The twelve remonstrating colonies still refused
to furnish troops. Etruria was discontented, almost in
open rebellion ; the Glauls and Ligurians were ready to
make another inroad into Italy. The news from Spain,
even if it was coloured as favourably as it appears in Livy's
narrative (a circumstance much to be doubted), could
not deceive the senate on the subject of Scipio's real suc-
cess. There was not the slightest doubt that Italy would
ag^in have to bear the brunt of war, and that now, after
ten years of exhausting warfare, she would scarcely be able
to resist a double assault. The Romans might well ask,
what gods would watch over their town in such perilous
times,^ when, in spite of all their prayers and all their
vows and sacrifices, the paternal deities had shown them-
selves inexorable or else powerless to ward o£F the devas-
tation of Italy and disasters like those of Thrasymenus and
Oannse. Again — as always happens in days of extreme
danger — the popular mind, tortured by religious terrors,
saw everywhere signs of the divine anger ; and, in the eflFort
to avert this anger, it gave itself up to horrid delusions,
ascendancy oyer the Spaniards left him no other choice. We are really at a
loss to decide which is more extraordinary, the boldness of this conceit or its
utter stupidity. Heeren {Ideen, ii. 1, p. 291) observes very justly: * If
Hasdrubal had not succumbed to the Roman arms in Umbrin, the deified
Scipio would have been deprived of his glory.' Mommson implies the same
(Rom. Gtich. i. 643) when he says : ' The gods covered the faults of their
favourite with laurels.' We see from Livy (xxviii. 42) that Scipio's proceed-
ings in Spain were sharply criticised in Rome.
* Livy, xzvii. 35 : * Periculosissimus annus iraminere videbatur.'
' Livy, xxvji. 40 : * Quos tam propitios urbi atque imperio f jre deos, ut
eodem tempore utrobique res publica prospere gorcrotur.'
382 ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK and to the cruelty of superstition.' Again it rained
% — ^L^^ stones, rivers ran with blood, temples, walls, and gates
of towns were struck by lightning. But more than usual
terror was caused by the birth of a child of uncertain sex,
and so large that it seemed to be four years old.' Soothsayers
were specially sent for from Etruria, and at their suggestion
the wretched creature was placed in a box and cast into
the sea far from the coast. Then the pontifices ordained
the celebration of a grand national festival of atonement.
From the temple of Apollo before the town, a procession
marched through the Porta Carmentalis, along the Yicus
Jugarius to the Forum. At the head of the proces-
sion walked two white cows, led by sacrificial servants ;
behind them were carried two statues of the royal Juno,
made of cypress wood; then followed three times nine
virgins in long flowing garments, walking in a single line
and holding on to a rope, singing to the measured time
of their footsteps, in honour of the goddess, a hjmn, which
Livius Andronicus, the oldest Boman poet, had composed
for this special occasion, and which later generations —
justly, no doubt — considered a specimen of ancestral
rudeness. At the end of the procession came the ten
ofiScers who presided over sacrificial rites (decemviri sacris
faciundis), crowned with laurel and clothed in purple-
bordered togas. From the Forum the procession went,
after a short pause, through the Vicus Tuscus, the Vela-
brum, and the Forum Boarium, up the Clivus Publicius, to
the temple of Juno on the Aventine. Here the two cows
were sacrificed by the ten sacrificial priests, and the statues
were put up in the temple of the goddess. This simple
and dignified solemnity is interesting, not only because,
being taken from the priestly archives, the narrative is no
doubt authentic and trustworthy, but because it shows, in
a very clear and unmistakable manner, to what extent
the Boman mind was at that period already penetrated by
* liivy* xxvii. 87.
' Liyy, /oc. ciir, 'Liberatas religioDO* mentes tnrbavit rorsus xmntiAtmn
FntfliDODe natnn in&Dtem esse qnadrimo parem, nee magnitudine torn mimn-
dum, qiiam quod incertUB, mas on femioa esset, natus erat.*
THE SECOND PUNIC WAR.
383
CHAP.
VIU.
Fifth
PSBIOD,
211-207
B.C.
Greek ideas. The Soman pontifices arrange a festival in
honour of a Boman deity, Juno the Queen. The religious
procession, with rhythmical walking and singing, is like-
wise Eoman, but the procession starts from the temple of
the Greek Apollo; the ten officers, the keepers of the
Sibylline oracles of the same god, perform the sacrifice,
while a poet of Greek extraction, Andronikos, who sixty-
four years before had been dragged into slavery from
conquered Tarentum, composed the solemn hymn, which,
in spite of its hard and uncultivated lang^ge, marked, no
doubt, an immense progress when compared with the old
and scarcely intelligible litanies of the Bomulean ' fratres
arvales.' In the very midst of a war which threatened
Eome and Italian culture with ruin, we can watch the
signs of the increasing ascendancy of the Hellenic mind.
Amidst their prayers for divine protection, the Romans HiUtsry
did not forget to take measures for confronting the im- ^*5ie'**
pending danger. The number of the legions was in- Bomans.
creased fix>m twenty-one to twenty- three. The conscrip-
tion was enforced with the greatest severity; even the
maritime colonies, which had hitherto been exempt from
service, were compelled to furnish troops. Ostia and
Antium alone remained exempt, but were ordered to keep
their contingents in constant readiness.' From the Spanish
legions 2,000 foot and 1,000 horse were detached and sent
to Italy, besides 8,000 Spanish and Gaulish mercenaries ;
from Sicily came 2,000 slingers and archers. The two
legions of liberated slaves, which, since the death of
Gracchus, had been neglected, were re-organised and com-
pleted, and thus a military force was set on foot large
enough to take the field as well against Hannibal as
Hasdrubal.
The consuls selected for the momentous year 207 were ^5^?*"^"
Caius Claudius Nero and Marcus Livius Salinator. The ciHudina
former — the great grandson of the celebrated censor Appius S® l*°^
Claudius the Blind — had, immediately after the taking of Saliimtur.
Capua in 211 B.C., been sent as propreetor with an army to
* LiTy, xxTii. 37.
38-4 ROM.iN HISTORY.
BOOK Spain, to retrieve the fortunes of war in that country after
IV . *
the destruction of the Soman armies under the two
Scipios. His alleged successes over Hasdrubal are either
entirely fictitious or greatly exaggerated. It was said
that he had outmanoeuvred the Punic general, and might
have made him prisoner with his army, but allowed him-
self to be delayed by negotiations about an armistice
until the whole hostile force had had time gradually to
escape from its critical position. In his command in
Spain he was superseded, in 210, by the younger Scipio.
In what manner he so gained the confidence of the people
as to be intrusted with the consulship in 207, we are not
told. His colleague, Livius Salinator, was a tried old
soldier, who twelve years before had conducted the Illyrian
war successfully, and ended it with the last triumph that
Bome had witnessed. But from that time he had been
lost to his country. He had been accused and condemned
for an unjust distribution of the Illyrian booty,' and had
felt so hurt at this indignity that he had retired into the
country, had allowed his beard and hair to grow, and had
refused for eight years to take part in the affairs of state,
until in the year 210 the consuls Marcellus and Valerius in-
duced him to return into the town. The censors of the
same year Yeturius and Licinius re-introduced him into
the senate, fr^m which he had probably been expelled in
consequence of his public condemnation ; still his wrath
was not appeased. He never took part in the discussions,
but sat moodily listening in silence, until at last the
accusation of one of his relations, M. Livius Macafcus, who
by his negligence had caused the loss of Tarentum,
induced him to speak. Now, when the people needed a
good general, they bethought themselves of the tried old
soldier, and, in spite of his remonstrances, elected him as
the colleague of Claudius Nero. But a difficulty had still
to be overcome before the intention of the people could
be realised. Nero and Livius were personal enemies.
How was it possible to intrust the welfare of the state in
' Frontinus, Straieg, iv. 1 ,45.
THE SECOND PUNIC WAR. 385
such a critical period to men who hated one another? CHAP.
It was not enough to separate the consuls in their com- * ^1^
mand, by sending one southward against Hannibal, and p^^
the other against Hasdrubal into the north of the penin- 211-207
sula. The division of the supreme command among two ^'^*
men, which had so often been the source of weakness in
the wars of the Soman republic, was surely ruinous if
such an enemy as Hannibal were opposed by men who
hated one another. It was absolutely necessary not only
to reconcile the two consuls, but to unite them by
cordial friendship. This arduous task was accomplished
by the senate. Both Nero and Livius overcame their
personal feelings of resentment, and this triumph of
patriotism over personal passion was a happy augury
and almost a guarantee of the final triumph over the
foreign enemy.
The Bomans were far from having finished their pre- Has-
parations for the ensuing campaign when the allied Mas- <iriibai'8
silians brought the news of Hasdrubal's march through through
Gaul, and made it evident that he would cross the Alps in ^^^^'
the early part of the spring. He had marched from the
western Pyrenees right across southern Graul to the Bhone,
had been hospitably received by the Arvemi and other
tribes, had enlarged his army by newly enlisted merce-
naries, and, after passing the winter in Gaul, was preparing
to cross the Alps by the same road which his brother had
taken eleven years before. It was evident that neither
the difficulties of the Alpine passes nor the hostilities of
the mountaineers would deter him. The passes offered
no insurmountable difficulties in the good season, and the
inhabitants of the Alps had learnt by experience that the
Carthaginian armies had not come to make war on them,
but only to march through their country. If the Eomans
wished to avoid the mistake of 218, and to meet the Car-
thaginians at the foot of the Alps, the utmost dispatch in
the movement of their armies was imperatively demanded.
Every step that Hasdrubal made in a southerly direction,
after crossing the Alps, brought him nearer to his brother
VOL. II. c 0
386 ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK and increased the danger which the union of the two
IV.
brothers threatened to bring upon Borne.
Movements Hannibal had probably wintered in Apulia^^ and at the
baL °°'' beginning of spring marched into Bruttium to collect and
organise the troops in that country. Thereupon he. started
northwards, and encountered the consul, Claudius Nero,
who, with an army of 40,000 foot and 2,600 horse, was
posted near Grumentum, in Lucania, to stop his advance.
An engagement took place, in which Nero claimed the
victory, and Hannibal is reported to have lost 8,000 dead
and 700 prisoners.^ But this seems not to agree with the
statement that Hannibal continued his march and soon
after halted near Yenusia. Here he paused, hardly, as it
would appear, because he was afraid of the Boman army
which followed him, and which, at the worst, was able only
to annoy, but not to harm, him ; he was probably waiting
for news from his brother, in order to be sure on which
road and at what time he should march northwards to
meet him. On receiving no news of any sort, he turned
back again to Metapontum, to join another reinforcement
which his lieutenant Hanno had in the meantime collected
in Bruttium. Whether it was his intention to induce the
Boman consul to follow him southwards, or to draw him
into an ambush, we cannot tell. Nero followed him
closely, and when Hannibal soon afber turned again north-
wards and encamped at Canusium, in the neighbourhood
of the glorious battle-field of Cannae, Nero had again
* This may bo inferred from the circumstance that, according to Livy
(zxYii. 40), Hannibal, qaite in the beginning of the campaign, marched through
the district of Larinnm, into the country of the Sallentinians, i.e. from north to
south. The remark of Arnold (HisL of Borne, iii. 363) is very much to the
point: *At no part of the history of this war do we more feel the want of a
good military historian than at the opening of this memorable campaign.
What we have in Livy is absolutely worthless ; it is so vague as well as so
falsified that the truth f^m which it has been corrupted can scarcely be
discovered.*
*, Summing up all the killed and prisoners which Hannibal is said to ha^'e
lost in these marches, we get a total of about 15,000 men. Very properly,
Arnold (loc» cU,) calls these statements 'absurdities in which we cannot
but recognise the perversions of Valerius Antias, or some annalist equally
nntruBtwortliy.'
THE SECOND PUNIC WAR. 387
taken up his position close to him, and from the mounds chap.
of their respective camps the Eoman and the Carthaginian >_Z^^*
sentinels were idly watching each other whilst, at a dis- ^ifth
tance of a few days' march further northwards, the fate of 211-207
Borne and Carthage was decided. "•^*
Haying crossed the Alps, Hasdrubal had met with no Capture of
Eoman army in Cisalpine Gaul. The prsetor L. Porcius ^^^^^^f
Licinus, who commanded two legions, either came too Hafldrudal.
late or did not venture to penetrate far beyond the Po.
Eeinforced by Gauls and Ligurians, Hasdrubal tried to
take Placentia by storm, but was soon compelled to give
up this enterprise, for which he had neither means nor
time ; and he now advanced southwards on the Flaminian
road by Ariminum. It was his intention to meet Hannibal
in TJmbria, and then to march with the combined armies
upon Namia and Eome.^ He communicated this plan to
Hannibal in a letter, which he dispatched by the hands of
four Gaulish and two Numidian horsemen through the
whole length of Italy, across a thickly-peopled hostile
country, where at every step they ran the risk of being
discovered and hunted down. The undaunted horsemen
made their way as far as Apulia, but could not find Han-
nibal, and, roaming about in search of him in the neigh-
bourhood of Tarentum, were at last discovered and made
prisoners. Thus Nero was apprised of Hasdrubal's march
and of his plans, whilst Hannibal was waiting in vain for
news from his. brother. Now was the time for forming a
quick and bold resolution — such a resolution as, under
ordinary circumstances, was quite beyond the conception
of a Soman general.' It was necessary to deviate from
the ordinary routine and from the prescribed order.
Apulia and Bruttium had been assigned as the provinces
* Livy, xxvii. 43.
* * Claudius non id tempus esse rei publics ratus quo consiliis ordinariis
provincise sue quisque finibus per exercitus buos cum hoste destinato a eeuatu
bellum gereret ; audendum aliquid improvisum, inopinatum, quod cceptum non
minorem apud cives quam liostes terrorem faceret, perpetratum in magnam
Isetitiam ex magno metu verteret.'— Livy, xxTii. 43.
c c 2
388
ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK
IV.
March of
Nero.
of Nero; it was his task to keep Hannibal in check,
whilst his colleague, Livius Salinator, confronted Has-
drubal in the north. Shonld he take upon himself to
leave the province assigned to him, to encroach upon the
province of his colleague, and to o£Per an uncalled-for
aid ? If the haughty Livius, who had only just subdued
his old animosity at the call of his country, should reject
the proffered aid — if he should come too late — if Hannibal
should discover his march, pursue and overtake him — ^if
from any other cause the enterprise should fail, Claudius
Nero was doomed to be for ever branded as the author of the
greatest calamity that could befall his country, and Borne
would be given up to the mercy of the conquerors. By
silencing all scruples and taking upon himself the weighty
responsibility, Nero showed a moral firmness and strategic
ability which far surpassed the average qualifications of
which Soman generals could boast. Even the failure of
his plan would not have sufficed to condemn him before
the impartial tribunal of history; but, fortunately for
Bome, his just calculations and his bold resolve were
destined to be crowned with complete and overwhelming
success.^
Nero informed the senate of Hasdrubal's plans, and of
what he himself was resolved to do. He recommended
the government to send two legions which were stationed
at Rome up the Tiber to Namia, for the purpose of block-
ing up that road in case of necessity, and at the same
time to replace them in the capital by one legion, which
was stationed in Campania under the command of Fulvius.
He then selected out of his army 7,000 of the best foot
' According to the narrative, as transmitted to us, Nero formed his resolution
of marching to the assistance of Livins on the strength of the information
which he casually obtained respecting Hannibal's march from the six inter-
cepted messengers. But we can hardly suppose that Nero had no direct news
from Livius of the direction of Hasdrubal's march. There was nothing to
prevent the two Roman generals from keeping up a continuous correspondence
with one another, for they were not separated by any hostile fj»rces. It would
surely have been an unpardonable negligence if Nero had heard of his
colleague's dangerous position only by a despatch of the enemy, which a mere
accident had thrown into his han^.
THE SECOND PUNIC WAR. 389
soldiers and 1,000 horse,' and left his camp 30 quietly that CHAP.
Hannibal did not perceive his march. The inhabitants of , 1^
the country through which he passed, the Larinatians, p^^^
Frentanians, Marrucinians, and Praetutians' — had been 211-207
informed of his approach, and called upon to furnish pro- "'^'
visions for his troops as well as horses, draft cattle, and
vehicles for the transport of the baggage and of the men
that might break down on the road. The sentiments of
the population of Italy now became unmistakably apparent
in a genuine outburst of enthusiasm and of devotion for
the cause of Eome, which was the cause of all Italy.
Every man was eager to help, to contribute something
towards putting down the common enemy. Old and young,
rich and poor, hurried to the places where Nero's soldiers
were expected to pass, supplied them with food and driok,
warmed them by their sympathies, followed them with
the most ardent wishes for victory, while thousands of
,«.ng „,« ^ «t«« «,Hier,Ved the ».., «
volunteers.*
The march was pressed on without delay. The soldiers Bftttle of
would scarcely indulge in so much rest as nature impera- Metaurus.
tively required; they were inspired by their enthusiasm
with superhuman strength. In the neighbourhood of the
colony of Sena, to the south of the river Metaurus, Nero
found his colleague Livius, and not far from him the
* According to Frontinus {Strateg, i. 1, 9) he took with him a force of
10,000 men.
* The order in which Livy mentions these peoples (xxrii. 43) is not correct,
and famishes another proof of his ignorance of the geography even of Italy. —
Compare above, p. 172, and p. 336, note 2.
' It is worth while to read the description of Livy (xxyii. 45), one
of the best in his whole work: 'Per instructa omnia ordinibns vironim
muliemmque nndiqne ex agris efiiisoram inter vota et preces et landes ibant :
illos pnesidia rei pnblicse, rindices urbis Bomane imperiique appellabant ; in
illorum armis doxtrisque suam liberoramqne suorum salntem ac libertatem
repositam esse. Beos omnes deasqne precabantnr, nt illis faustum iter
felixque pugna ac matura ex hostibns victoria esset, damnarenturque ipsi
votonim, quse pro iis snscepissent, ut quemadmodum nunc soUiciti prose-
querentnr eos, ita paucos post dies Iseti ovantibns victoria obviam irent.
Invitare inde pro se quisqne et offerre et fatigare precibns, ut quse ipsis iumen-
tisquc Usui esscnt, ab se potissimum sumcrent ; benigne omnia cumulata dare.'
390 ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK prBBtor L. Porcius Licinus^ each encamped with two legions
opposite Hasdrubal. In the stilhiess of the night Nero
and his troops were received into the consular camp, and
distributed into the tents of their comrades, so that the
area of the camp was not enlarged. It was the intention
of the Eoman consuls to withhold from Hasdrubal the
knowledge of the arrival of reinforcements, in order to
induce him the more readily to accept battle. At any rate
a battle must be fought before Hannibal should become
aware of Nero's march and hasten to support his brother.
On this depended the success of the whole campaign. In
case of need the consuls would have been compelled to
attack the Carthaginian camp. Hasdrubal, however, was
not long ignorant that both consuls were confronting him.
The double signals which he heard from the Eoman camp
since Nero's arrival left no doubt of the fact, and the
troops which had just arrived exhibited manifest signs
of a long and fatiguing march. Hasdrubal could explain
the arrival of the second consul only by supposing that
Hannibal's army was defeated and annihilated, and he
resolved accordingly to return into the country of the
Grauls, and there to wait for accurate information. In
the same night he gave orders to retire beyond the
Metaurus. But, by the faithlessness of his guides, he
missed the way, wandered long up and down the river
without finding a ford, and when morning dawned, saw
his disordered and exhausted troops pursued and attacked
by the Bomans. He had no longer time to cover himself
by throwing up fortifications for a camp. In the most
disadvantageous position, with a deep river in his rear, he
was obliged to accept battle, and, from the very first, he
felt the necessity of either conquering or dying.* The
battle lasted from morning till noon. The Spaniards on
Hasdrubal's right wing fought with the inborn bravery of
their race against the legions of Livius. The Glauls on
* Poly bios, xi. 1, § 3 : irpoBitiKri^s Bri Bu Karh, rhv TopSrra Kiy^woy yuc§if 4^
BifilfrKMiy,
THE SECOND PUNIC WAR. 391
the left wing occupied an unassailable position. Nero, on CHAP,
the right wing of the Soman line, saw that he had no ^ ^™'_
chance of producing an impression on them ; he therefore ^^fth
shifted his position, marched with his men behind the rear 211-207
of the Soman line to the left, and attacked the Spaniards ^'^'
in flank and rear. This manoeuvre decided the battle.
The Grauls on Hasdrubal's left wing appear to have
behaved very badly. They did not avail themselves of
Nero's retreat for the purpose of pushing forward, but
gave themselves up to sloth and rioting, and were after-
wards found lying for the most part drunk and helpless on
the ground, so that they could be slaughtered without
offering resistance. When Hasdrubal saw his best troops
falling under the overwhelming attack of the Somans and
that all was lost, he rushed into the thickest throng of
battle and was slain. Nothing was wanting to make the
Soman victory complete. Ten thousand of the enemy, for
the most part Spaniards, fell in the battle.^ The Gauls and
Ligurians fled in the utmost disorder, and tried to gain
their respective homes. Of ten elephants six were killed,
four taken. The Carthaginian army was destroyed ; and,
for the first time in the course of the war, the Somans
could boast that they had on Italian soil revenged the
fatal day of Cannse.
Nero's plan of marching northward had become known ^^ect of
in Some ; the town had not ceased to be agitated with oiTtle ^
feverish excitement. Everybody felt that a decisive ^™a°«-
moment was approaching, and there were many who were
far from approving Nero's bold resolution.^ The senate
* According to Polybius (xi. 8), the Carthaginians lost 10,000, the Romans
2,000. It is impossible to reconcile with this statement that of Liry, who
(xxrii. 49) speaks of 66,000 Carthaginians killed and 5,400 taken, and
estimates the loss of the Romans at 8,000. These numbers are probably too
high. It was the intention of some Roman annalists to contrast the battle of
the Metanms with that of Cannie (Liyy, loe, eit, : ' reddita sequa Cannensi
clades videbatur '), and thej were therefore prone to exaggerate rather freely.
The numbers of Polybius seem to deserve more credit, though we must not
forget that his partiality for the Scipios may hare induced him somewhat to
depreciate the Tictory of Nero and Livius. Compare Appian, vii. 32.
' Livy, xxrii. 44,
392 ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK remained assembled^ day after day, from early mom until
/ ^ evening, supporting and counseUing the civic magistrates;
the people thronged the streets and especially the Forum ;
all the temples resounded with the prayers of the women.
Suddenly an uncertain rumour ran through the crowd
that a battle had been fought and a victory gained. But
the hopes of the people had been deceived so often that
they refused to believe what they wished for with agonising
eagerness. Even a written despatch of Lucius Manlius,
sent from Namia, met with but partial credit. At last the
news spread that three men of senatorial rank, delegated
by the consuls, were approaching the city. The excite-
ment of impatience now reached its highest point, and
masses of the population rushed out of the gates to meet
the messengers. Every man was anxious to be the first
to hear certain news, and as the crowd picked up scraps of
information from the messengers or their attendants, the
joyful tidings travelled fast from lip to lip. Still no formal
announcement was made, and slowly the messengers
rode onwards through the swelling throng to the Forum.
It was with difficulty that they could penetrate to the
senate-house. The crowd pressed after them into the
building, and could scarcely be kept from invading the
sacred precincts where the senate was assembled. The
official report of the consuls was at length read in the
senate, and then Lucius Veturius stepped out into the
Forum and communicated to the people the ftiU tidings of
victory — that the two consuls and the Soman legions were
safe, the Punic army destroyed, and Hasdrubal, its leader,
slain. Now all doubts were removed, and the people gave
themselves up to boundless joy. The first feeling was that
of gratitude to the gods. At last they had heard the
prayers of their people, had overthrown the national
enemy and saved Italy. The senate decreed the celebra-
tion of a public thanksgiving, which was to last three days.
The Eoman people, tired and sick of war, fondly nourished
the fairest hopes of peace, and seemed almost to forget
THE SECOND PUNIO WAE. 398
that Hannibal still occupied Italian soil, nnconqiiered CHAP,
and terrible as ever.* ., . '.*
Prom the field of battle on the Metaurus Nero marched, ^^^
with the same rapiditj with which he had come, back into 211-207
his camp near Cannsium,' where Hannibal was still waiting ^*^*
for news from his brother. This news was now brought ^^j^^
in an unlooked-for manner. Hasdrubal's head was cast by
the Romans before the feet of his outposts, and two Car-
thaginian captives, set free for this purpose by Nero, gave
him an account of the disastrous battle which had wrecked
all his hopes. When Hannibal recognised the bloody head
of his brother he foresaw the fate of Carthage.* He im-
mediately broke up with his army, and marched southward
into Bruttium, whither his victorious opponent did not
venture to follow him. The war in Italy was now to all
appearances decided. It was in the highest degree un-
likely that Carthage would repeat the enterprise of another
invasion of Italy, which had just signally failed. After
the loss of Sardinia and Sicily, soon to be followed by that
of Spain, it seemed to be of little use, in a military point of
view, to retain any longer a comer of Italy, especially as an
attack upon the Carthaginian possessions in Africa might
now be expected. Nevertheless Hannibal could not make
up his mind to leave of his own accord a country which
had been the theatre of his great deeds, and where alone,
as he was convinced, a mortal blow could be dealt at Some.
For four years longer he clung with astounding tenacity
to the hostile soil, and for all this time his name and his im-
conquered arms continued to strike terror throughout Italy.
At the close of the year which determined the successful Triumph
issue of the war, Rome had, for the first time after a long ^ng^,
interval, days of national rejoicing, and the consuls cele-
brated a well-deserved triumph. After the fall of Syracuse
* Livy, xxvii. 60, 61.
* According to Livj (zxrii. 51), Nero took no more than six days for this
march of about 260 miles, -which seems utterly impossible.
■ Livy, xxvii. 61 : * Hannibal tanto simul publico familiarique ictus luctu
agnoscere se fortonam Carthaginis fertnr dixisse.'
394
ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK
IV.
the senate had refused to accord to Marcellus the triumph
which he eagerly coveted, and an ovation on the Alban
mount was but a poor substitute for the usual display of
triumphal pomp within the walls of Bome. Fabius indeed
had triumphed when he had been fortunate enough to get
possession of Tarentum by the treachery of the Bruttian
garrison. Bufc, in spite of the great show of treasures and
works of art which he displayed before the gazing mul-
titude, nobody was deceived as to his real merits in a
military point of view. Now at length Boman generals
had fought a pitched battle and had overcome an enemy
second in reputation only to Hannibal. The senate decreed
that both consuls, as they had fought side by side, should
be united in their triumph. They met at Prseneste, Livius
at the head of his army, Nero alone, as his legions had been
ordered to remain in the field to keep Hannibal in check.
Livius entered the city on the triumphal car, drawn by four
horses, as the real conqueror, because on the day of battle
he had had the aiispices, and the victory had been gained in
his province. Nero accompanied him on horseback ; but,
though the formal honours accorded to him were inferior,
the eyes of the crowd were chiefly directed on him, and he
was greeted by the loudest applause, as the man to whose
bold resolution the victory was principaUy due.»
Sixth Period of the Hannibalian War,
FROM THE BATTLE ON THE METATTRUS TO THE TAKING OP
LOCRI, 207-206 B.C.
Character From the beginning of the war to the great victory at
ffinfwTand ^^^°^® ^® ^^ ^^ Carthage had been in the ascendant.
Roman The defection of Capua, Syracuse, Tarentum, and numerous
other allies of the Eomans was the fruit of this rapid
conquests
in Spain.
^ L\yj, xzviii. 9 : ' Itaqne iret alter consul snblimis cnrm multiiugis, tn
Tellet, equis : uno equo per nrbem yerum triumphiun rehi, Neronemqne etiam
si pedes incedat, rel parta eo bello rel spreta eo triumpho gloria memorabilem
fore . . . Notatum eo die plnra carmina militaribus iocis in C. Clandinm
qnam in eonsnlem sunm iactata.'
B.C.
THE SECOND PUNIC WAR. 395
succession of victories. But the fortunes of Carthage did CHAP,
not rise higher, and soon the re-conquest of Syracuse, of >, , L.^
Capua, and of Tarentum marked the steps by which Borne ^,™
gradually rose to her ancient superiority over her rival. 207-205
The annihilation of Hasdrubal's army was the severest
blow which she had yet inflicted, and it proved the more
disastrous to the cause of Carthage as Hasdrubal's expe-
dition into Italy had been effected only at the price of the
virtual abandonment of Spain. Whatever may have been
the tactical result of the battle of Bsecula,' in which
Scipio claimed the victory, its results were, as far as he
alone and the campaign in the Spanish peninsula were
concerned, those of a great military success ; for the best
and largest portion of the Carthaginian forces in Spain
withdrew immediately after and left him almost undisputed
master of all the land from the Pyrenees to the Straits of
Calpe (Gibraltar). An additional advantage for Scipio
was, that on the withdrawal of the Punic army more and
more of the Spanish tribes embraced the cause of the
Somans, whose dominion had not yet had time to press
heavily on them, and through whose help they hoped, in
their simple-mindedness, to recover their independence.^
This vacillation of the Spanish character explains to some
extent the sudden and wholesale vicissitudes of the war in
that country. Nothing appeared easier than to conquer
Spain ; but nothing was, in reality, more difficult than to
keep permanent possession of it. Thus the first Car-
thaginian conquests in Spain, under Hamilcar Barcas and
his son-in-law Hasdrubal, had been effected with wonder-
ful rapidity, owing to internal divisions among the Spanish
tribes. Hannibal had, on his march to Italy, subdued, as
he thought permanently, all the country between the
IberuB and the Pyrenees; but the mere appearance of
the Soman legions under the Scipios had swept away this
acquisition, and in their very first campaigns the two
1 See above, p. 379.
* Livy, zxvii. 17 : ' Velnt fortnita inclinatio animorum Hispaniam omnem
arejterat ad Romnnum a Punico imporio.'
396 ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK Boman generals penetrated far to the south, into the heart
V, / -^ of the Carthaginian possessions. When the Carfchaginians
were entirely expelled from Spain, it took the Bomans
two hundred years of hard fighting before they could say
that the whole of Spain was in their possession and
pacified.^ In the first ten years of the Hannibalian war
they persistently reinforced their armies in Spain at the
greatest cost, and their perseverance was not without its
effect ; for the hold that the Carthaginians had on Spain
was materially weakened, and they could no longer draw
from it the large supplies of soldiers and treasure which
they had received from that country in the beginning of
the war. It lost accordingly much of the importance
which it had had in their eyes. Yet it was not entirely
given up by them, even after Hasdrubal had evacuated it
with the best part of the Carthaginian forces. Another
Hasdrubal, the son of Gisgo, a very able general, and
Hannibal's youngest brother Mago remained still at the
head of respectable armies in Spain, and were receiving
reinforcements from Africa. Nevertheless, it is not diffi-
cult to perceive that the power of Carthage was now on the
wane. Not a single vigorous effort was made to regain
what had been lost. The theatre of war was transferred
more and more southward, into the neighbourhood of
Gades, the last town of any importance which had re-
mained of the whole of the Punic possessions in the
peninsula. It seemed that the Carthaginians placed all
their hopes of final success on the issue of the war in
Italy, and that firom the victory of the two sons of Barcas
in Italy they expected the recovery of Spain as a natural
consequence.
Alleged Under such circumstances the task of Scipio was
exploits of comparatively easy; and however much his panegyrists
' No terms can be more to the point than those by which JAvy (zxir. 42)
characterises the Spaniards as a ' gens nata instanrandis reparandisque bellis.'
This was felt not onlj bj the Romans, but in modem times by the French.
Equally appropriate is Livy*s expression at another place (xxviii. 12): * His-
pania non quam Italia modo, sed quam uUa pars terramm bello reparando
aptior erat locorum hominumque ingeniis.'
THE SECOND PUNIC WAR. 397
endeavoured to extol his exploits in Spain and to represent CHAP,
him as a consummate hero, they have not succeeded in
convincing us that, in a military point of view, he had p^^™
an opportunity of accomplishing great things. We see 207-206
clearly that the glory of Scipio is the engrossing topic of ^'^'
the writers who record the progress of affairs in Spain. ^V}^ "^
His individual action is everywhere conspicuous. We can
almost fancy that we are reading an epic poem in his
honour, and some of the scenes described unmistakably
betray their origin in the poetical imagination of the
original narrator or in an actual poem.^ It is not difficult
to discover these traces of poetry. But as we possess no
strictly sober and authentic report of events by the side
of the poetically coloured narrative, we are unable to
separate fiction from truth by any but internal criteria,
and in many instances this separation must be left to the
tact and individual judgment of the critical reader.
On his first appearance in Spain, Scipio had won the Popularity
hearts of the people. When, after the capture of New ^^^^^1,°
Carthage, they had seen his magnanimity and wisdom,
their admiration for the youthful hero rose to such a
height that they began to call him their king. At first
Scipio took no notice of this. But when, after the battle
of Bsecula, he liberated the prisoners without ransom, and
the Spanish nobles, seized with enthusiasm, solemnly pro-
claimed him their king>* Scipio met them with the decla-
ration that he claimed indeed to possess a royal spirit,
but that, as a Boman citizen, he could not assume the
royal title, but was satisfied with that of Imperator.
Polybius makes this the opportunity for extolling Scipio's
moderation and republican sentiments, and he expresses
* Such a passage is that where the meeting of Scipio and Masinissii is
described (Livy, xxviii. 35): 'Goeperat iam ante Numidam ex fuma rerum
gestarum admiratio riri substitueratque animo speciem quoque corporis amplam
ac magnificam : ceterum maior pnesentis veneratio cepit ; et praeteiquam quod
suapte natura multa maiestas inerat, omabat promissa csesaries habitusque
corporis non cultus munditiis sed virilis rere ac militaris et setas in medio
virium robore/ etc.
* Polybius, X, 40. Livy, xxvii. 19.
393 KOMAN HISTORY.
BOOK surprise khat he stretched out his hand to seize a crown
neither on this occasion nor at a later period when, after
the overthrow of Carthage and Syria, he had reached
the height of glory, and * had free scope to obtain royal
power in whatever part of the earth he wished.' * This
opinion, so unhesitatingly expressed by Polybius, is in the
highest degree strange and startling. It proves beyond
dispute that in his time, i.e. in the first half of the second
century before our era, the establishment of monarchical
government was a contingency which the imagination of
the Romans did not place beyond the reach of possibility ;
that at any rate distinguished members of the nobility
were reputed capable of aspiring to a position above the
republican equality which befitted the majority of citizens.
It is true we find this idea expressed by a Greek, who
perhaps had no conception of the deep-seated horror with
which a genuine Roman looked upon the power and the
very name of a king, and whom the history of his own
nation since the time of Alexander the Great had made
familiar with the assumption of royal dignity by successful
generals. Moreover, Polybius intimates that, in his
' The passage of Polybius (z. 40) is of great significancei and deserres to be
quoted at full length: Aih Ktd avvaBpoiaas nrohs '^Ifimpas /ScuriAuc^s yukv 1^
fiouKtoBcu Ktd KeytcBai xapb. Tourty Ktd reus itkriBeiais infApx^i^f fiwriXtis ye
fi^v olrrc i$€Ktiy tlvai olfTc KiytaBai irap' ovScvt. Tavra 8^ ciV^v Tap^yywiXe
arfwrriyhy avrhy xpoa^yw, "Itrvs fi^p oZv koX rArt Zucalvs &y ris hr^ffti/iitifaro
rijv fieyaKo^vx^ riufJiphSf f KOfuSp y4os &y Ktd rris r^xi|S cfirrf trvv^K^pa^^ns
M roaovToVf &<rr€ ir(£vras rovs &KOTarrofA4vous 4^ airr&v hri t€ toOtiiv Karwy^'
X^v'w 'Hjv tidXiir^iv ical r^v hpoiMarUw^ tyMS iv 4avT^ ii4ft€iy€ icai iretpipTetro r^r
Toimnnv ipfA^p Ktd ^tamturiay, TLoKv 5c fiakKoy &tf ru $auf»dtrtu rj^y brtpfioX^
rrjs vcpl rhy &v5pa fieydKot^vxica fi\4^tu tls robs itrx^fovs rov fitov Ktupobs^
ilvUca vpibs ro7s Kork r^v *lfii:ipitiy fpyois irarccnrp^ifwro fiku Kapx>fioylovs Koi
rh TKturra Ktd KdWurra ii4pfi\ r^s litfi6fis iath r&y ^lAofrov $»fi&y €ots 'HpeucAcfcvr
trniKvy &Kh T^y rijs waTpiSos ilovcrlay ffycryc, KaT€trTp4^ro 8^ tV *Anlay Ktd
roifs riis Svpfeis fiaatXtis Ktd rh KdJiXitrrtty Ktd fx4yurroy fi4pos rvs olKOi^4nis
\nt4iKoo¥ ivoiiitrt 'PwfialoUf fXajSc 8i Katpols els rb T«piiroy^tratr$ai
Zvvatrrflav 0atri\iKiiv iv oJs &v 4Ti$d\oiTo Ka\ /SovAijOcfif rSvois
rris olKovfi4viij5, With these startling words we may compare Dion Cassius
(frgm. Ivii. 36): trt {'XKixUity) fieiCwy rris Kotyrjs iur^>d\ias 4yfy6yei ....
throes [x^ lavrois ritpaywov tt^txlperoy 4natrKiiirwriy ('P«/icub<), and Zonaras
(ix. 11) : o{ 5i iy r^ P^f*V • • • • ^6fitp /i^ tntfp^poviitTas rvptxyyitrp iiyeKts\4tTttyro
wr6y.
THE SECOND PUNIC WAR.
399
opinion, Scipio might haye made use of his influence and
of circumstances to obtain royal authority, not in Bome,
but in Spain, Asia, or elsewhere. Perhaps he thought such
a regal or yice-regal position not incompatible with the
duties of a Boman citizen and general, much, perhaps, as
the men of the house of Barcas had been defdcto kings in
Spain, and had yet continued to serve the Carthaginian
state as dutiful subjects ; but, in spite of aU these conside-
rations, the judgment of Polybius, with regard to Scipio's
refusal of the royal title, must be looked upon as a sign of
the times. It is the first faint shadow which coming events
cast before them. The dominion of Bome over the pro-
Tinces made it necessary to confer upon individuals from
time to time monarchical powers; and these temporary
powers were the steps to the throne of the Boman em-
perors. Spain was the first country that witnessed the
autocratic power of Boman nobles; and it was in the
family of the Scipios that this became first apparent. It
grew from generation to generation, and under its weight
the republic was crashed. There had been a time in
Bome, and it was not far back, when not even the thought
of the possibility of monarchical power could have been
entertained by any one. In the Samnite wars, in the wax
with Pyrrhus, and in the first war with Carthage, the soul
of every Boman was filled by the republican spirit alone.
Another form of government than that of the free republic
was inconceivable in Bome, just as it is inconceivable at
the present day in Switzerland and in the United States
of America. All the accusations brought by the Boman
annalists against Spurius Cassius, Spurius Meelius, and
Marcus Manlius, for alleged attempts to seize monarchical
power, are nothing but inventions of a later period. But
this period begins, as we now see, after the Hannibalian
war, when a writer like Polybius could find reason to
praise Scipio for refusing the royal title and for abstain-
ing from the assumption of royal authority.
In spite of the republican sentiments and the modera-
tion which Scipio displayed wii h regard to the offer of the
CHAP.
VIII.
w
Sixth
Pkkiod,
207-205
B.C.
Magnifi-
cence and
power of
Scipio.
400
KO^LVN HISTORY.
BOOK
IV.
Capture of
Oringis
by the
Komans.
royal title, his conduct and demeanour showed a kind of
royal bearing and of conscious superiority over his felloiwr-
citizens. He was surrounded by something like a court
on a small scale. His first confidential adviser and most
trusty servant was Caius Leelius/ who was employed
especially to execute delicate commissions and deliver
messages in Bome, to sound Scipio's praise and to
keep together his friends in the senate. Besides this
diplomatic agency he was also intrusted with military
duties, like Scipio's elder brother Lucius, and like Caius
Marcius, the brave tribune who in the year 212 had
saved the remnants of the Boman army from utter de-
struction. Even the propnetor Marcus Junius Silanus
received orders from him as if he were an imperial legate,*
whilst the commander-in-chief directed the movements of
his inferiors from his head-quarters at Tarraco.
The year 207 B.C., which was so decisive for the war in
Italy, seems not to have been marked by any noteworthy
events in Spain. Afber Hasdrubal had marched with his
army across the Pyrenees and Alps, it appears that the
Carthaginians did not feel strong enough for any offensive
operations, and Scipio too was weakened, as he had sent
a part of his forces for the protection of Italy •• He re-
mained stationary in Tarraco, where he had wintered, and
we hear only of a march of Lselius to Bsetica in the ex-
treme south of the peninsula, where he encountered and
worsted Hannibal's brother Mago, and captured a Punic
general named Hanno. The only other event assigned to
this year is the taking of a place called Oringis,* by Scipio's
brother Lucius, on which occasion 2,000 enemies and not
more than ninety Bomans are said to have fallen.^
^
' Polybius, X. 3, § 2 : Fcfeoj Aai\tos iiri y4ov fterttrxnif^t «*Tf iravrhs Hpyov
' Livy (xzvi. 19) calls him Scipio^s ' adiutor ad res gerendas.'
* See above, p. 383. Nevertheless Livy says (zxriii. 1) that in Spain
* renatum snbito par priori bello,* which is merely an empty phrase.
* Whether this place is identical with Auringis, mentioned before by Liry
(xxiv. 42), and "where it was situated, we do not know.
* Livj*, xxriii. 3.
THE SECOND PUNIC WAR. 401
The succeeding year, 206 b.c., witnessed the total ex- CHAP,
tinction of Punic dominion in Spain. Scipio had probably ,— , \^
again reinforced his army after the battle on the Metaurus. p^™^
The news of that victory produced a great effect in Spain, 207-205
and gained new allies for the Bomans. Scipio marched *'^'
again southwards, and met a second time at Baecula a ^^^^^f
large Carthaginian army under Hasdrubal, the son of Beecula.
Gisgo, which, after a severe struggle, he compelled to
retreat into its camp, and drove further and further south
shortly after.' Hereupon he returned by slow marches to
Tarraco, leaving Silanus behind to pursue the broken
hostile army. This army, it appears, dwindled away fast.
The Spanish troops deserted and went to their respective
homes, while the Punians retreated to the island town of
Gades. Thus the war was brought to an end on the con-
tinent of Spain. Here, as well as in Sicily and Sardinia,
the superior strength and perseverance of Bome had pre-
vailed over the Carthaginian armies, which were apparently
better led, but composed of worse materials.
The contagion of defection, which in great part had OreTtures
caused the loss of Spain, now began to attack the native ni^«^
African troops, which, more than any other portion of the Scipio.
* This second victoiy of Bsecula is exposed to as serious historical douhts
as the first. Even the name of the locality is uncertain ; for Livy (xzviii. 12)
mentions the name Silipa, besides Bsecula ; the manuscripts of Polybius have
Elinga, which has been corrected into Ilipa ; and Appian calls the place by
the strange name of Karmon. Great victories make even insignificant places,
such as Cannse, celebrated ; and it seems, therefore, to be rather a questionable
triumph of which not even the locality is fixed and known. It can further
be shown that Scipio*s firiends were guilty of great exaggerations. Livy, who
is not generally inclined to understate the results of Roman feats of arms
says that the army of Hasdrubal was 64,000 strong, but that some writers
made it 20,000 more. He does not mention Polybius; but, by chance, a
fragment of this historian has been preserved (xi. 20 if.) in which the battle
is very fully related, and from which it appears that he is the authority for
the greater number. This statement, accordingly, may be considered to be
based on family traditions of the Scipios. Lastly, the reported issue of the
battle is such that it betrays the false colouring to anyone slightly accustomed
to judge such reports. The numbers of the killed and captured Carthaginians
are not given ; the battle is said to have been interrupted by a sudden thunder-
storm, and the Carthaginians, as well as the Eomans, retire into their neigh-
bouring camp. After this, what remains of the alleged victory?
VOL. II. D I>
402
ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK
IV.
Relations
of Scipio
with
Syphax.
Carthaginian armies, had hitherto been the terror of the
legions. Masinissa, the brave Numidian prince, who a
few years before had fought against the rebellious Syphax,
and had since then rendered the most important services
in Spain with his excellent cavalry, was beginning to find
out, with the native shrewdness of a barbarian, that the
cause of his friends and patrons was lost, and he was
anxious, before it should be too late, to secure for himself a
safe retreat into the catnp of the conquerors. He was shut
up in Gades with the remnant of the Carthaginian army,
but found an opportunity of treating with Silanus,* and
is even related to have had a secret interview with Scipio
himself, in which the terms of an alliance between him and
Eome were discussed, and his co-operation was promised
in case the war should be carried into Africa.* Thus the
first preparations were made for the execution of the plan
which Scipio Was already maturing in his mind, viz., of
bringing the war to a conclusion in that country, where
the most deadly blows could be inflicted on Carthage.
But before Masinissa's help was quite secured, Scipio
endeavoured to restore and to strengthen the amicable
relations which for several years had existed between Rome
and Syphax, the most powerful prince of the western
Numidians or Masssesylians. In the year 215 Syphax had,
in the hope of aid from Bome, taken up arms against
Carthage. But he seems to have been left to his own
resources, and the few Roman officers whom the two
Scipios had sent to him from Spain * had proved unable to
convert his unruly Numidians into anything like a regular
and steady infantry. He was accordingly worsted and
expelled from his kingdom by the Carthaginians and their
allies, the Numidians, under King Gula and his son
Masinissa. Under what conditions the Carthaginians
* Livy, zzviii. 16.
* Livy, xxviii. 35. It seems hardly probable that Scipio, merely for the
purpose of conferring secretly with Masinissa, went from one end of Spain
(Tarraco) to the other (Gades). The meeting of Scipio and Masinissa is
probably only a poetical pendant to the meeting with S} phaz, which is equally
fictitious. ' See above, p. 315.
THE SECOND PUNIC WAJft, 403
afterwards made peace with him and allowed him to return CIIAP.
into his country, we are not informed. We hear only that,
with the subtle treachery of a barbarian, he sent an p **^^
embassy to Bome in 210, to assure the senate of his 207-205
friendship, whilst he was in amicable relations with ^'^'
Carthage. The secret intrigues carried on with him and
with Masinissa are not known to us. It may be that
Scipio wished to gain the friendship and alliance of both.
But it was in the nature of things that neither Borne nor
Carthage could be on good terms with one of the two rivals
without making an enemy of the other. The two
Numidian chiefs could not be on the same side, for each of
them aimed at obtaining exclusive possession of the whole
of Numidia. As long as Masinissa was faithful in the
service of the C^haginians, Syphax tried to keep on good
terms with Bome \ but as soon as he heard that Masinissa
had betrayed his friends and gone over to the Bomans, it
was no longer possible for him to remain in a neutral or
even hostile position to Carthage. If one of the two
Numidian chiefs turned to the rightj it was necessary for
the other to turn to the left. It was therefore a vain
attempt on the part of Scipio to secure the co-operation of
Syphax in the war with the Carthaginians after he had
detached Masinissa from their side.
Livy gives a long and graphic description of a dangerous Alleged
voyage of Scipio to a Numidian port ; of his meeting, by an ^^g^jpf^,
extraordinary coincidence, with Hasdrubal, the son of with
Gisgo, in the yery house and at the table of Syphax ; of '^^^
negotiations there conducted, on which occasion Scipio's
personal qualities again drew forth the admiration of his
enemies, and lastly of an alliance concluded with Syphax.^
The whole of this narrative belongs, in all probability, to the
domain of fiction. It looks like a rhapsody in the epic poem
of the great Scipio. The facts related are nothing but
the personal adventures of a few heroes ; they have not the
slightest influence on the course of eyents, and cannot even
* Livy, xzriii. 18.
D D 2
404 KOMAN HISTORY.
BOOK be made to liarmonise with it. The alleged treaty with
TV
^ , Syphax * turns out to be a fable, and the Quixotic voyage
to Africa cannot be fitted chronologically into the year
206.* If therefore negotiations really took place between
Scipio and Syphax, it is probable that Lselius, or some other
confidential agent, was the negotiator, and not the com-
mander-in-chief himself.'
Story of Not a whit more authentic, and not a whit more in-
fl»m«8°at*^ teresting as bearing on the course of events, is the detailed
New Car- narrative given by Livy * of the magnificent funeral games
^^^' which Scipio celebrated in New Carthage in honour of his
father and his uncle. The gladiatorial combats on this
occasion were not of the kind usually exhibited in Rome
at the funerals of great men. Instead of hired gladiators,
free and noble Spaniards, who had offered themselves
voluntarily and with a chivalrous zeal, fought with one
another to do honour to the great Scipio. Nay, the mortal
combat was turned into an ordeal. Two kinsmen, rival
claimants of a disputed crown, resolved to decide their
quarrel by an appeal to arms, and at the same time to
enhance the brilliancy of Scipio's funeral games by their
* Livy(xxriii. 18): • foedusictum/
* Compare Weis8enbom*8 note toLivyxxviii. 16. The faotis, too many erents
are crowded into the year 206 ; first, the march of Scipio fromTarraco into the
valley of the Beetis (Andalusia) and the battle of BaBcnla ; this alone takes,
according to Livy {loc. cit. § 10), at least five months ; secondly, the voyage to
Numidia (Livy, xxviii. 17); thirdly, the taking of Illiturgi, Castulo, and
Astapa (ch. 1 9 ff.) which presupposes a second expedition from the north of
Spain into Andalusia ; fourthly, the funeral games (ch. 21); fifthly, Scipio's
illness and the mutiny of the army (ch. 24-29) ; sixthly, the campaign across
the Ebro against Mandonius and Indibilis (ch. 31 ff.); seventhly, Scipio*s
journey to Masinissa, being the third expedition into Andalusia (ch. 35) ;
eighthly, Scipio's journey to Rome before the end of the year, for the purpose
of securing his election to the consulship of 205. Weissenborn proposes to
apportion some of these events to the year 207 ; but even if this were done,
there would still remain a good deal to be apportioned to the limbo of fiction.
' An analogous case of misrepresentation occurs at a later period of the
war. In the year 203 B.C., negotiations again took place between Scipio and
Syphax (Livy, xxx. 3), which, according to the general account of the annalist8,
were conducted by messengers. But here again one writer — Valerius Antias,
not notorious for his veracity— preferred a more striking account, and related a
personal interview in Scipio's camp, for which, of course, he had to draw on
his imagination. * Liry, xxviii. 21.
THE SECOND PUNIC WAR. 405
personal encounter. Scipio's refined hnmanity was of ClfAP.
. . . VIII
course revolted at this singular and atrocious suggestion ; ^-^
lie sought to persuade the rivals to desist from their inten- j^j™
tion, but, being unable to do so, he consented at last to this 207-206
singular trial by battle, which was at the same time a show
for his troops, and in which one of the two princes was
killed after a severe, and no doubt interesting, fight. What
are we to think of historians who gravely accept such wild
flights of imagination as actual facts, to be recorded in
sober historical prose, and who dwell upon them with
visible satisfaction ? A single chapter of such history as
this is sufficient to cast doubt on other stories connected
with Scipio's doings, even though they should not in them-
selves be fantastic or ridiculous.
When the Carthaginians had evacuated all Spain with storming
the smgle exception of Gades, there remained nothing for °^™*^^-
Scipio to do but to make war upon those of the former
Carthaginian allies who might not be found willing to
exchange the dominion of one foreign and alien power for
that of another, or upon those tribes which had distin-
guished themselves by their hostility to Home. To the
latter belonged the town of lUiturgi on the river Bsetis.
The inhabitants of this place, formerly subject to Carthage,
had joined the Bomans in the beginning of the war, but
after the defeat of the two Scipios they had made their
peace with Carthage, by killing the Boman fugitives who
had fled into their town from the battle-field.* This cruel
treachery now called for vengeance. lUiturgi was taken
by storm. All the men, women, and children were killed
indiscriminately, and the town was levelled with the
ground.*
' Livy, xxviii. 19.
^ Li^'y, xzyiii. 20 : * Turn vero apparuit ab ira et ab odio urbem expugnatam
esse : nemo capiendi vivos, nemo, patentibus ad direptionem omnibus, prsedse
memor est: trucidant inermes iuxta atque armatos, feminas pariter ac viros,
usque ad infantiam csedem ira crudelis pervenit. Ignem deinde tectis iniiciunt
ac diruunt quae incendio absumi nequeunt.' The evident satisfaction \7ith
vrhich Livy paints this scene, and which is hardly disguised by the qualification
of ira as crudelis^ shows that the barbaric practices of ancient warfare caused
little compunction even to the humanity and refinement of the Augustan age.
406 ' ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK The neighbouring town of Castulo was treated less
severely, because, terrified by the fate of lUiturgi, it had
IV.
Destruc- Surrendered to Marcius and delivered up a Punic garrison,'
tion of Marcius then inarched upon Astapa (the modem Estepa,
south of Astigi). This unfortunate town became the scene
of one of those horrible outbreaks of frenzied patriotism
and despair of which the natives of Spain in ancient and
modem times have given several examples. The men of
Astapa raised in their town a huge funeral pile, cast all
their treasures on it, killed their wives and children, and
let the fiames consume all, whilst they themselves rushed
against the enemy and fell in battle to the last man.'
They had had no choice left between this terrible end and
the still more terrible one of Illiturgi, and they thought
that the bitterness of death would be less at the hands
of sacrificers than of butchers.
lUnesBof Hitherto Scipio had met with uninterrupted success.
Scipioand The Oarthaffinians were driven out of Spain; all the
mutiny of *^ i i . .
troope. native peoples were subdued or had voluntarily joined the
I&oman cause ; negotiations had been entered into with the
two most powerful Numidian chiefs, who promised their
assistance in the further prosecution of the war in Africa,
when suddenly the promising result was jeopardised — for
Scipio, the man on whom everything depended, was
suddenly taken ill. Even the bare rumour of this cala-
mity, exaggerating his illness the further it spread,
caused disquietude in the whole province ; and not only the
fickle Spanish allies, but even the Boman legionary soldiers,
unexpectedly evinced a spirit of insubordination and even
mutiny.' A body of eight thousand Eoman soldiers,
stationed near Sucro, had even before this time been
animated by a bad spirit; they had complained that
their pay was withheld, that they had been forbidden to
despoil the Spaniards, and that they were kept too long
* This was probably the remnant of the broken-up Carthaginhin army.
' On a similar deed of the Saguntines, see Livy, zxi. 14.
* Livy, xxviii. 21:' Apparuitque qnantam ezcitatura molcm vem faiaset
dades cum ranus rumor tantas prccellas cxcivisset'
THE SECOND PUNIC "WAR.
407
on foreign service. Now, when the news of Scipio's illness
had reached them, their discontent broke out into open
resistance to the orders of the legionary tribunes ; they
elected two private soldiers as their leaders,* plundered the
surrounding country, and seemed to be about to imitate
the example of the Campanian legion in the war with
Pyrrhus, in renouncing the authority of Borne, and in esta-
blishing somewhere an independent dominion of their own.
As yet, however, they had not been guilty of any open act
of violence and bloodshed, and had ventured on no outrage
against the majesty of Rome beyond the violation of
military discipline and subordination, when the news
arrived that Scipio was not dead, nor hopelessly ill, but
that he had recovered, and that he ordered them to march
to New Carthage, for the purpose of receiving the pay
that was due to then^. They obeyed, and were soon
brought to their senses. Scipio caused them to be sur-
rounded and disarmed by faithful troops, the ringleaders
to be seized and executed, and order and discipline to be
restored without further difficulty. The danger dis-
appeared as if by magic, and it was shown again what a
power Scipio possessed over the n^inds of his soldiers.*
The mutiny of the army being suppressed, the re-
bellious Spaniards were soon punished. Scipio crossed
the Ebro, penetrated into the land of the llergetes and
Laretani, on th^ north side of this river, defeated the
brothers Mandonius and Jndibilis, and forced them to
submission and to the paynuent of a sum of money.
Before the year closed, Gades fell into the hands of the
EomQiUS. For a regular siiBge of this strong island town,
Scipio would have needed not only a considerable army
but also a large fleet. But he could not avail himself of
his ship99 as he had taken the rowers from them to employ
CHAP.
vui.
— — « — — '
Sixth
Period,
207-205
B.C.
Defeat of
Mandouias
and Indi-
bilifl.
Fall of
Gadea.
> The oames of these n^en were C. Atriiu and C. Albius, i.e, John Blaek
and John White (Livyt zxYiii. 21), and they seem hardly historical.
' The story of the mutiny at Sacro contains nothing that is improbable in
itself; bat the intention is evident to glorify Scipio as the apholder of Boman
discipline. M ^QJ T^t^ too much has been made of the affair*
'408 ROMAN niSTOKY.
BOOK on land service. He songht, therefore, to gain the
*- r^ — ' town by treason, a plan which had succeeded in so many
instances, and which promised an easier and speedier
result. Negotiations were begun. In Grades, as well as
in all places occupied by the Carthaginians, it was easy
to find traitors who declared their readiness to deliver the
town, as well as the Punic garrison, into the hands oi
the Bomans.* But the plot was discovered, and the ring-
leaders were seized and sent to Carthage, to await their
punishment. Nevertheless, the Carthaginians seem to
have despaired of holding Gades permanently. The inha-
bitants were Punians, but not Carthaginians. They were
in the condition of subject allies, a condition which was,
no doubt, felt to be burthensome and unsatisfactory. They
took very little interest in the struggle for supremacy
between Bome and Carthage, for neither the one state
nor the other allowed them an independent position.
Perhaps the commercial rivalry of Carthage was con-
sidered to interfere with the prosperity of Gades,* whilst
nothing was to be apprehended from Bome on this score ;
and the whole trade in the western seas was, after the
humiliation of Carthage, sure to fall into the hands of
Gades, under the protection of the Bomans. Such dispo-
sitions as these, on the part of the population of Gades,
would explain the severity with which Mago was ordered
by the home government to treat the town — a severity
which could aim not at maintaining possession of Gudes,
but at exacting from it mercilessly the means for con-
tinuing the war with Bome, and then giving it up. Ma^
plundered not only the public treasury and the temples,'
but even private citizens, and then left the port of Gades
with the whole fleet and all the forces. In this undignified
way the Carthaginians abandoned the last hold they still
* Livy, zxviii. 23.
' With shortsighted selfishness the Carthaginians had sacrificed the interest
and prosperity of the provincial towns for the benefit of the capital (see
aboTe, p. 11), just as the maritime powers of modem Europe formerly did with
regard to their colonial possessions.
■ Livy, zxviii. 36.
THE SECOND PUNIC WAR. 409
had on Spanish soil. Gades, of course, opened its gates to CHAP.
the Bomans, and obtained favourable conditions of peace, ^—1^
under which it continued for a long time to flourish, as p^^,^
an allied city, subject indeed to Borne, but enjoying 207-206
perfect freedom in the management of its own local
affairs.'
Thus Spain was lost, not in consequence of a great Signifl-
decisive battle, but by the gradual retreat and exhaustion the battle
of the Carthaginians. The last effort for the defence of 9j^}*®
Spain had been made when Hasdrubal Barcas appeared
with the Spanish army on Italian soil. It was on the
Metaurus that the Bomans conquered Spain, and Scipio
had nothing to do but to follow the traces of the wounded
lion to the last recesses, and to scare him away. Before
the year closed, he could look upon this task as done.
He intrusted the chief command to his legate, M. Junius
Silanus,^ and returned to Bome, accompanied by La^lius,
to secure his election for the consulship of the ensuing
year, and to mature his plans for carrying the war into
Africa.
The hopes which Hannibal had entertained from the Policy of
alliance and co-operation of King Philip of Macedon had jj^^J^on.
not been realised. Instead of taking an active part in the
operations in Italy, where his excellent Macedonian troops
would infallibly have decided the war in favour of the
allied powers soon after the battle of Cannae, Philip at-
tacked those countries on the east of the Adriatic for which
he had stipulated as his share of the booty after the defeat
of Bome,' taking it apparently for granted that, even
v^ithout his help, Hannibal would be able to accomplish
the conquest of Italy. He succeeded in gaining consider-
able advantages in Illyria, and, regarding himself as already
undisputed master of the countries north of the Ambracian
Gulf, he seemed to be bent on changing the influence
which he enjoyed, as the protector of some of the Greek
states, into a real dominion over all. He laid aside more
« Liry, xxYiiL 37 ; nxii. 2. Cicero, Pro Balho, 16, 34 ; 18, 41.
» Pol^bius, xi. 33, § 8. 'See above, p. 230.
410
ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK
IV.
Condition
of the
Greek
statog*
and more the qualities of a leader of the Greeks, and
assumed those of an Asiatic despot. The amiable cha-
racter which he had exhibited in his youth gave way to
low Yoluptuousness, falsity, and cruelty when he had
become a man* He fior&ited the confidence and attach-
ment of his best friends, the Achseans, when he endea-
voured, by cunning and cruelty, to keep possession of
Messenia. The royal debauchee was not ashamed, whilst
he was a guest in the house of his old friend Aratos, to
dishonour the wife of his son, and, when Aratos reproached
him, to cauge his death by poison. The old jealousy and
all the passione and internal disputes of the Greeks, which
were to have been buried for ever by the peace of Nau-
paktos, in 217,* revived at once, and it was not difficult
for the Eomans to kindle again the flames of war, and
then to leave the king of Macedonia so much to do in his
own country that he was obliged to give up the attempt
of a landing in Italy.
There is little use in attepipting i^ determine who was
guilty of having caused the interference of Rome in the
internal affairs of Greece. Owing to the preyaleniee of
small independent states, the spirit of nationality could
not embrace all the Greek peoples, and bind them durably
together for common action against any enemies what-
ever. No abstract considerations of public moralitj or
national duty ever prevented any Greek community from,
seeking the alliance of a foreign power ; they accepted it
without the least scruple, if it promised immediate mate-
rial advantages. Few Greeks ever felt patriotic scruples
in availing themselves of Persian money or Macedonian
troops to strike down their own immediate neighbours
and Hellenic compatriots. Even the great national
sti-uggle against Asiatic barbarism, under Miltiades and
Themistokles, had not united all the Greeks in their
common cause, and since that time no equally grand
national enthusiasm had raised them above the petty
* See above, p. 278.
THE SECOND PUNIC WAR. 411
jealousies of local interests. A short time before the inter- chap.
ference of the Komans, the Achaean league had appealed
to the Macedonians, and made them the arbitrators ^ixth
, ^ Pkkiod,
in the internal affairs of Hellas. If, therefore, on the 207-205
present occasion, the ^tolians called in the Romans, we ^'^'
can only condemn them of having committed a sin against
their own nation which none of the other Greeks would
have scrupled to commit, a sin which is the inevitable
curse of internal division in every nation of ancient or
modem times.
Nevertheless we must acknowledge that the league Lengu**
which the -Sitolians now concluded with the Bomans !f*^^i?"
. tho^to-
was distinguished by peculiar turpitude. It waa an en- lians and
gagement by which the whole j^tolian people became Romans
Boman mercenaries, and stipulated that their hire should
be the plunder of the neighbouring (Jreek cities. They
agreed to make common cause with the Bomans, like a
band of robbers. The Bomans were to furnish ships, the
j^tolians troops ; the conquered countries and towns were
to become the spoil of the ^tolians^ the movable booty
that of the Bomans. If w<e recoUect that this ' movable
booty ' included the inhabitants who might fall into the
hands of the conquerors, and who would consequently be
sold into slavery, we ghall duly appreciate the sense of
national dignity that could animate the j^tolians and induce
them to conclude so disgraceful an alliance with foreign
barbarians for the enslaving of their countrymen. And even
this conduct might perhaps have been excused or palliated
to some extent if extreme danger, or the necessity of self-
defence, had urged the ^toUans, as a last resource, to
secure foreign help on these terms. But it was, in truth,
nothing but their native robber instinct that induced
them, instead of honestly cultivating their fields, to plough
with the spear and to reap with the sword. They suc-
ceeded by their league with the Bomans once more in
setting Greece in a blaze of war, in filling the whole
length and breadth of the land with untold misery, and
in preparing for subjection to a foreign yoke the nation
412
ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK
IV.
Effects of
the league
with the
iEtolians.
War be-
tween the
which would not submit to the discipline of a national
state. Our indignation at their conduct is mingled with
a feeling of satisfaction when we remember that they
were the first to feel the weight of this yoke, and that they
were almost driven to despair and madness when they felt
how galling it was.
After the fall of Syracuse and Capua, M. Valerius
Lsevinus crossed over to Greece with a fleet of fifty ships
and one legion,* and made his appearance in the popular
assembly of the -Sltolians, the leading men of which had
been previously persuaded to favour the Koman proposals.
He found no difficulty in prevailing upon them to renew
the war with Philip, as he held out the prospect of con-
quering the Acarnanian country, which they had coveted
for a long time, and' of regaining the numerous towns
taken from them by the Macedonians. It was supposed
that all would join the alliance who, from their own in-
terest, or from old hostility, were the natural enemies of
Macedonia, such as the Thracian barbarians in the north,
the chiefs Pleuratus and Skerdilaidas in lUyria, the Mes-
senians, Eleans, and Lacedaemonians in Peloponnesus ;
lastly, in Asia, King Attains of Pergamum, who, feeling
unsafe in his precarious position between the two great
monarchies of Macedonia and Syria, welcomed the Romans
as his patrons, and thus made an opening for their diplo-
macy to interfere in the political afTairs of the distant
East. Valerius promised to assist the ^tolians with a
fleet of at least twenty-five ships, and both parties en-
gaged not to conclude a separate peace with Macedonia.
Thus the Eomans had let loose upon Philip a pack of
hounds, numerous enough to keep him at bay in his own
country and to prevent him from thinking of an invasion
of Italy. They were relieved from all anxiety on this score,
and were not even obliged to make great efforts for the
defence of their eastern coast.
It is not necessary for us to follow in detail the course of
* Livy, xxvi. 1, 24.
THE SECOND PUNIC WAR. 413
the war in Greece. It was marked, not by ffreat decisive CHAP.
. VIII
actions, but by a number of petty conflicts and bar- . ^L^
barous atrocities, by which the strength of the nation was p^™
sapped and wasted. The source of the greatest calamities 2u7-20d
* B C
was this, that the hostile territories were not compact
masses, separated from one another by a single line of fnd PMHp
frontier, but detached pieces, scattered about irregularly, of Mace-
and intermingled in the Peloponnesus, in central Greece, ° **
and on the islands. Thus the war was not confined to one
locality, but raged simultaneously in every quarter. In
the Peloponnesus the Achseans were harassed continuously
by the ^tolians and the Lacedaemonians, who, in this
last period of their independence, had exchanged their
venerable hereditary monarchy and their aristocratic con-
stitution for the government of a tyrant. The proud
Spartans, formerly the sworn enemies and opponents of
tyranny in all parts of Greece, had at last succumbed to a
tyrant themselves. Machanidas, a brave soldier, had
made himself their master, and exercised a military de-
spotism in a state which at one time appeared to the
wisest of the Greeks the model of political institutions.
The coasts of the Corinthian Gulf and the ^gsean Sea
were visited by Roman, ^tolian, and Pergamenian fleets,
that plundered and devastated the towns and carried
away the inhabitants into slavery. From the north,
hordes of barbarians broke in upon Macedonia. Philip
was compelled to hasten from one place to another. When
he was confronting the Thracians, he was called away by
messengers to protect his Peloponnesian allies; and scarcely
had he marched southwards, when his hereditary dominions
were invaded by Illyrians and Dardanians. He conducted
this difficult war not without vigour and ability, and suc-
ceeded, by his restless activity and quickness, in showing
himself superior to his enemies in every part, in driving
back Pleuratus and Skerdilaidas in Illyria, in beating the
^tolians (210 b.o.) near Lamia, and chasing them into
their own country. Attains of Pergamum was surprised by
Philip, near the town of Opus, which he had taken and
414
ROMAN HISTORY.
JJOOK
IV.
Return of
Si'ipio to
Rome.
was just in the act of plundering. Barely managing to
escape captivity, he returned into Asia, and, being occupied
in disputes with his neighbour, King Prusias of Bithynia,
paid no more attention to the affairs of Greece. The
Bomans took very little part in the war. Under these
circumstances, some of the neutral powers, the Khodians
and the king of Egypt, almost succeeded, as early as
208 B.C., in bringing about the restoration of peace be-
tween King Philip and the ^tolians. But the Romans
made the negotiations abortive by now resuming the war
with increased vigour on their part.* After a short armis-
tice, hostilities were continued; and if Philip had possessed
a respectable fleet,^ he would have had no difficulty in
reducing the exhausted iBtolians to submission. In 206
B.C. he penetrated a second time to Thermon, the capital
of their country. His allies, the Achseans, under the
command dF the able general PhilopcBmen, gained a de-
cisive victory over the Spartans, in which the tyrant
Machanidas was killed ; and as the Eomans neglected
more and more to render the services to which they had
bound themselves in the treaty, the -SJtolians were com-
pelled at last, in 205 B.C., to conclude a separate peace
with Macedonia, in formal violation of their engagements
with Rome.
On his return from Spain in the year 206, Scipio enter-
tained not unfounded hopes that, at an age when other
men began to prepare themselves for the higher military
commands and oflBces of state, he would be rewarded with
a triumph, the greatest distinction to which a Soman citi-
zen could aspire, as the crowning honour of a life devoted
to the public service. He had not indeed been invested
with a regular magistracy. Without having been praetor
he had been sent to Spain, with an extraordinary command
as propnetor ; nor had any but the regular magistrates
ever celebrated a triumph. But the Hannibalian war
' Livy, xxTiii. 30.
* Hf! resolved in the year 208 to build a hundred ships of war ; but we do
not know if this plan was ever carried into osecution. — Livy, xxviii. 8.
THE SECOND PUNIC WAR.
41.
CHAP.
VIII.
Sixth
Pkriod,
207-205
B.C.
had made people familiar with many innovatioDS, and
among these innovations, Scipio's extraordinary command
was so prominent that the concession of a triumph, as
a natural consequence of it, seemed hardly likely to
meet with any serious opposition. In the temple of
BeUona' accordingly, before the walls of the city, Scipio
enumerated before the assembled senate all his exploits in
Spain ; he told them how many battles he had fought, how
many towns he had taken, what nations he had brought
under the dominion of the Boman people, and, though he
did not distinctly ask for a triumph, he expected that the
senate would of its own accord decree the honour he so
much coveted. But he was disappointed. His opponents
insisted that there was no valid reason for departing from
the old custom, and Scipio had to content himself with
displaying as much pomp and show as he could when he
made his entry into Bome as a private citizen, without the
solemn formalities of a triumph.* Hereupon the consular
elections for the next year took place amidst unusual acti-
vity on the part of the people. From all parts the Boman
citizens came in great numbers, not only to vote, but
simply to see the great Scipio. They thronged round his
house, followed him to the Capitol, where, in fulfilment of
a vow made in Spain, he offered a sacrifice of a hundred
oxen. He was unanimously elected consul by all the
centuries, and in their imagination the people saw him
already carrying the war into Africa and ending it with
the destruction of Carthage.
But the senate was far from exhibiting the enthusiasm l^ebntos on
and unanimity of the people. The friends and adherents tioVto^*^^^*
of Scipio found themselves opposed by independent men -A.frica
who did not possess unbounded confidence in him, and who
thought there was too much risk in an attack upon Africa
so long as Hannibal had not evacuated Italy. At the
head of these men was the aged Q. Pabius Maximus.
' Livy, xxviit. 38,
' Appian (vi. 38) inaccurately calls ihia entry into Bome a triumph : Kol
416 ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK His system of a pertinacious defensive warfare and of a
slow and cautious advance to the offensive had so far
proved eminently successful. By it Hannibal had gra-
dually been compelled to give up central Italy and to fall
back upon the narrow peninsula of Bruttium. Tabius
could see no cause why this system should now be aban-
doned. It was to be expected that, if it was persisted in
for some time longer, Hannibal would lose Thurii, Locri,
and Croton, the last strongholds in his power, and would
thus be compelled to retire from Italy. But if, in order
to carry the war into Africa, Italy were drained of troops,
it might be apprehended that Hannibal would again sally
forth from Bruttium and threaten Samnium, Campania,
or Latium. The plan of Scipio and his party was, without
any doubt, grander and more worthy of the Boman people.
It was reasonable to expect that a vigorous attack on the
Carthaginians in Africa would at' once lead to the recall of
Hannibal from Italy. Moreover it had ever been the custom
of the Bomans to attack their enemies in their own coun-
try. It was thus that they had warred in ancient times with
the Etruscans, the Latins, and the Samnites. They had
gone as far as Heraclea and Beneventum to meet Pyrrhus.
In the first Punic war they had made Sicily the battle-field,
and in the second they had sent out their armies and fleets
to Spain and across the Adriatic. It is true they had not
forgotten the Caudine passes, nor the rout of Regulus in
Africa ; but, after all, the greatest calamities had broken
upon Home when her enemies had been allowed to ap-
proach her too near, on the Allia, near the Thrasymenus,
and at Cannse. The time had come at last when they
could attempt that expedition to Africa which had been
part of the original plan of the Bomans, and which the con-
sul Sempronius had actually been commissioned to under-
take in the first year of the war. At that time Hannibal's
invasion of Italy had thwarted this well-considered plan.
But now Hannibal was so enfeebled that two consular
armies were sufficient to keep him in check ; he barely
maintained himself in Bruttium ; the remainder of Italy
THE SECOND PUNIC WAR. 417
was free from danger ; in Sicily, Sardinia, and Spain the CHAP,
war was practically at an end ; in Macedonia, where it had s... , L>
never been serious, it could at any time be ended by the p^^
conclusion of peace. It was therefore most assuredly the 207-205
time now to abandon the Fabian principle of cautious ^'^'
defence, which was calculated to prolong indelSnitely the
excitement, the disquiet, and the sufferings of the war, and
to gather up the whole energy of the nation for a bold de-
cisive blow, as the previous generation had done with
glorious success in the Sicilian war.
It cannot be doubted that the most weighty arguments Position of
brought forward against this plan were based on the
presence of Hannibal in Italy, who, though terribly ex-
hausted and lefb almost without resources, still shielded his
country by the mere terror of his name. If personal satis-
faction and his own glory, so distinctly acknowledged by
his enemies, could have been a compensation to him for
.the wreck of his hopes, he must surely have been consoled
and even gratified in watching this involuntary tribute to
his greatness. But it was his ambition to establish the
greatness of his country, and he knew no personal glory
apart from the prosperity and independence of Carthage.
The majority in the senate were not favourable to Scipio's Compro-
plans. He had foreseen this, and he was prepared to ^t^g^u
carry out his project Avithout the consent, and, if necessary, Scipio and
against the will, of the senate. It was rumoured that he ^^^ ^'
intended to avail himself of the favourable disposition of
the masses, and to obtain, without the authority of the
senate, a decision of the popular assembly by which he
would be commissioned to carry the war into Africa and
to raise the necessary forces. Such a procedure would
not have been unconstitutional, but it would have been
contrary to the usual practice, which had almost the
power of law, and by which the chief direction of the war,
and especially the distribution of the provinces, was lefb
entirely to the discretion of the senate. This body was
therefore thrown into great consternation when Scipio
showed himself resolved, as a last resource, to set their
VOL. II. £ £
418
ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK
IV.
Voluntary
coDtribu-
tioDs for
the fleet
and anny
of Scipio.
authoiitjr at naught, and to appeal to the decision of the
people. Violent debates took place, and at last the ple-
beian tribunes effected a compromise by which Scipio
abandoned the idea of provoking a decision of the people,
and promised to be guided by a decree of the senate, on
the understanding, however, that the senate would not
oppose his plan in principle. Hereupon the senate re-
solved to give permission to Scipio for crossing over from
Sicily into Africa;' but they voted means so inadequate for
carrying out this plan that Scipio was obliged first to
create for himself an army and a fleet before he could hope
to carry out his design with any chance of success. By
this decision, the obstructive party in the senate had, at
any rate, postponed his expedition, and they might hope
that in the meanwhile events would happen to make a
landing in Afidca unnecessary.
Scipio's colleague in the consulship was Publius Licinius
Crassus, who, being at the same time pontifex maximus,
was not permitted to leave Italy. He was therefore
commissioned, in conjunction with a prsetor, and at the
head of four legions, to operate in Bruttium, where he had
to watch and keep Hannibal in check, but where, during
the whole course of the year, nothing of importance took
place. Scipio had assigned to him only thirty ships of
war and the two legions composed of the fugitive troops
of Cannae and Herdonea.* No conscription was ordered
for new troops to serve under Scipio ; but he was allowed
to enlisb volunteers, and to call upon the towns of Etruria
to contribute materials for the fitting out of a fleet.' Thus
a force of about 7,000 men was collected, especially in
Umbria, the country of the Sabines,* Marsians, and Pelig-
m
' Livy, xxviii. 45 : * pemiissum, nt in Africam, 81 id e re publica esse
censeret, traiiceret. • See al)ove, p. 365.
■ No measure was so much calculated to raise the Roman nobles to a
position above that of private citizens, and to prepare the advent of monarchy,
as the permission given them to collect armies of volunteers, and to use their
private means and their credit for equipping ships of war. Men like Wallen-
Btein cannot permanently n*main subjects.
* Livy (xxviii. 45) enumerates particularly th"; to'.vns of Xarsia, Rciie, ani
B.C.
Roman
troops.
THE SECOND PUNIC WAR. 419
nions. The town of Camerintim, in TTmbria,^ alone sent CHAP.
a cohort of 600 men. Other towns contributed arms, pro- . ^^
visions, and various articles for the fleet ; Caere gave com, p^™
Populonia iron, Tarquinii sail-cloth, VolaterrsB timber* 207-205
and com. Arretinm, witti a liberality and zeal prompted
perhaps by the desire of proving its doubted fidelity, sup-
plied thousands of helmets, shields, lances, various utensils,
and provisions ; Perusia, Clusium, and KuseUse gave com
and timber. It is an agreeable surprise for us to find
these towns, some of which appeared to have fallen into
decay or oblivion, taking an active part in the war ; and
the inference is justified that Etruria had, in comparative
obscurity, enjoyed some of the blessings of peace.
By their contributions Scipio was enabled to order the state of the
building of thirty new ships,' and he went to Sicily, there
to complete his preparations. Besides the two legions from
Cannse and Herdonea, he found in Sicily a great number
of the old soldiers of Marcellus,* who after their discharge
had apparently remained in Sicily of their own accord,
Amiternum, and besides them he names SSabinus omnis ager.* This ex-
pressioD is very strange, as the three towns just named were precisely the
principal places of this very 'Ager Sabinus.' From the most ancient times
there prevailed great ragueness with regard to the geographical limitation of
the Sabine country. (See vol. i. p. 103). The Subines, who, on the termina-
tion of the third Samnite war, were received into the second class of Roman
citizens (see vol. i. p. 474), appear not to have been the people of Nursia,
Keate, Amiternum, and ' Sabinus omnis ager,' for Livy in oar present passage
(xxviii. 45) evidently refers only to those volunteers who were not Roman
citizens. Where in all the world those Sabines had their local habitation is a
mystery that I cannot solve. I am inclined to think thatLivy's {Epit. xi.) state-
ment, according to which the Sabines were reduced by Curius Bentatus in the
same year as the Samnites, is one of the frequent duplications of the same fact
which the compiling historians are so fond of, and that it was caused by the
circumstance that some annalists called the people conquered by Curius
Dentatus the Samnites, others the Sabinites, Saunites, or Sabines. This would
explain, or rather get rid of, the strange fact, that the Sabines, who were not
mentioned in the history of Rome for a century and a half, suddenly reappear
on the stage by the side of the Samnites as conquered enemies.
* Livy, ix. 30. See Weissenbom's note.
' ' Interamenta.' See Weissenborn's note to Livy xxviii. 46.
' On this occasion the ships were again built, as in the first Punic war (see
above, p. 53, note 4) with almost miraculous rapidity, being finished in forty-five
days. — Livy, xxviii. 45. * Li^'y, xxix. 1,
H K 2
420 ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK liad squandered the booty made in war, and, disdaining to
^ ^' . return to a life of honest toil and civil order, were ready
to try again the fortune of battle. The long war could
not fail to create a kind of professional soldiery, consisting
of men who had become unfit for agriculture and other
peaceful pursuits and who began to look upon war as their
trade. The licentiousness and savagery into which some
portions of the Boman armies had by that time fallen had
been shown by the mutiny of Scipio's soldiers in Spain ;
but the doings of these mutineers were soon thrown into the
shade by atrocities of a far more hideous and alarming
character, which betrayed the existence of the most dan-
gerous elements in the ranks. The incidents in Locri
formed only, as it were, an intermezzo in the grand drama
of the war, and did not essentially influence the course of
events and the final issue ; but they are too highly charac-
teristic of the public morals of the time to be passed over
in silence, especially as it is of far more importance for us
to form a picture of the moral and intellectual status of
the Roman people than to follow the details of battles, to
which, for the most part, little credit is to be given.
Snrprise Jq gpite of the attempts to take Locri which the Romans
aQu cap- ,
ture of had made since 208, it was still in Hannibal's possession,
^'^^^ and was now his principal base of operations in Bruttium.
The Roman partisans among the Locrians had fled from
the town when it revolted to the Carthaginians, and had
betaken themselves chiefly to the neiglibouring town of
Rhegium. Prom that place they opened communications
with some of their countrymen at home, and the latter
promised to admit Roman troops by means of ladders into
the citadel. The treason was carried into eflfect in the
usual way. As soon as the citadel was in the power of
the Romans, the town joined their cause ; the Punic
garrison retu'ed into a second citadel in another part of
the town, where it was at last compelled to surrender.
This successful surprise was planned and executed not by
the consul Licinius, who commanded in Bruttium, but by
Scipio, who was at that time commanding in Sicily,
THE SECOND PljNIC WAR. 421
because Hannibal and his army, standing between Locri CHAP.
and the four legions in Bruttium, prevented Licinius from . , '■.
penetrating into the neighbourhood, whilst the nearness of -p^™
Rhegium and Messana favoured the plan of making an 207-205
attack upon Locri from Sicily. ^'^'
Thus it happened that Scipio had the good fortune and Atrocities
the merit of gaining an important advantage beyond the Roman
limits of his own province. With this step, however, he «oidieps
also took upon himself the responsibility of the further capture of
proceedings at Locri, and these were of such a nature that ^^"•
they offered an occasion to his enemies for questioning
his ability as a general in one essential point. He caused
the chiefs of the Carthaginian party in Locri to be put to
death, and their property to be distributed among their
political opponents. If he had stopped here, nobody
would have blamed him, for, according to the prevailing
principle of justice, he had not been guilty of undue seve-
rity. But such a measure of punishment did not satisfy
the rapacity of his troops. These troops, treating Locri
like a town taken by assault, not only plundered it, but
indulged against the wretched inhabitants of both sexes
their beastly lusts and their sanguinary ferocity.' At last
they broke open the temples and ransacked even the sanc-
tuary of Proserpina, which, though lying unprotected
before the town, had hitherto been respected by enemies
and even by vulgar robbers.* The legate Pleminius, who
had been intrusted by Scipio with the command in Locri,
not only permitted all these atrocities, but took his share
in the plunder and protected the plunderers. Two legionary
tribunes, called Sergius and Matienus, who were under
his orders, strove to check the violence of the soldiers.'
' Lirj, xxix. 8 : ' In corpora ipsorum {i.e. the Locrians), in liberos, in coningeg
infandtt contumeliae editee.'
* According to a tradition, Pyrrhus had despoiled it; but the ships in
Tfhich the treasures were laden, were wrecked on the neighbouring coast ; and
Pyrrhus, under the impulse of religious scruples, caust^d all the treasures to
be restored. — Valerius Maximus, i. 1, ext. 1. Appian, iii. 12.
' This is Livy's report (xziz. 9). Diodorus, on the other hand, says (fragm.
libr. 27, p. 108, Tauchnitz) that they acted not from a feeling of indignation
422
ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK
IV.
MeflflorM
of the
Roman
senate and
people on
the com*
plaints of
the
Locrians.
A fight took place between the soldiers of the two tribunes
and the rest. Pleminius openly took the part of the licen-
tious plunderers, ordered Sergius and Matienus to be
seized, and was on the point of causing them to be exe-
cuted by his lictors when their soldiers arrived in larger
numbers, rescued the tribunes, ill-treated the lictors, seized
Pleminius, slit up his lips, and cut off his nose and ears. All
bonds of military discipline were cast aside, and the Roman
soldiers had become a riotous rabble.
Upon the news of these disgraceful and alarming pro-
ceedings, Scipio hastened from Messana to Locri, re-esta-
blished order, and, acquitting Pleminius of all guilt, left him
in command at Locri, whilst he ordered the tribunes Sergius
and Matienus to be seized as ringleaders of the mutiny and
to be sent to Rome for trial. This done he immediiitely re-
turned to Sicily. He was scarcely gone when Pleminius gave
full vent to his revenge, and, instead of sending the two tri-
bunes to Borne, caused them to be scourged and put to death,
after exquisite tortures. Then he turned with the same bar-
barous fury against the most distinguished citizens of Locri,
who, as he was informed, had accused him before Scipio.
Some of these unfortunate men escaped to Borne. They
threw themselves in the dust before the tribunal of the
consuls in the Forum, imploring protection for their lives
and property, and mercy for their native town. The
senate was greatly moved by proceedings so dishonourable
to the Boman name. It seemed that Scipio himself could
not be free from guilt. He was certainly responsible for
the discipline of his soldiers, and he seemed tacitly to
approve of the atrocities of Pleminius, which he had not
punished. It was not the first time that such disorders
had broken out among troops under his command, though
the insubordination of his soldiers in Spain was tiifiing
compared with what had happened now. His political
at the wrong committed, but because they found that they did not g^t their
proper share of the fipoils. Tovro d* iirpeerro¥ wk M rotn ytuofiipois 0^0-
voicToDrrci i^X* M r^ rh iiipot fi^i €t\itiip4ptu r&9 tr^wKufiiiftiP xpVh^f^^
iyKaKnwrts rh ir\rififi4\iifia. On this supposition we can explain S.'ipio's
aoTerity against the tribunes, which otherwise would be nnjnntifinble.
THE SECOND PUNIC WAR.
423
enemies, numerous and influential in the senate, charged
him with corrupting the spirit of the army, and insisted
that he should be recalled from his command. The lamen-
tations of the wretched Locrians called forth general sym-
pathy, and their undeserved sufferings demanded redress
and satisfaction. After a long and angry discussion,
Scipio's friends at last were so far successful that he was
not condemned without a previous investigation. The
praetor Marcus Pomponius was dispatched to Locri with a
commission of ten senators to send Pleminius and the
associates of his guilt for trial to Rome, to restore to the
people of Locri the plunder which the soldiers had taken,
more especially to set free the women and children, who
had been treated as slaves, to replace doubly the treasures
taken from the temples, and to appease the anger of Pro-
serpina by sacrifices ; moreover to inquire if the lawless
actions of the troops in Locri had been committed with
the knowledge and consent of Scipio, and if this should be
pr4)ved, to bring back Scipio from Sicily, and even from
Africa, to Rome. For this purpose two tribunes of the
people and an sedile were added to the commission, who,
by virtue of their sacred office, should, in case of necessity,
seize the general, even in the midst of his troops, and con-
vey him away. When the commission had reached Locri,
and, after discharging the first part of their duty, had ex-
pressed to the Locrians the regret and sympathy of the
Roman senate and people, as well as the assurance of their
friendship, the Locrians did not further insist on their
charges against Scipio, and thus saved the commission a
delicate and perhaps difficult task. It is not stated, but
we may perhaps be justified in supposing, that this gene-
rous resignation on the part of the Locrians was the result
of an expressed or implied wish on the part of the com-
missioners, and could be obtained by a very gentle pressure,
even if the Locrians did not see how desirable it was to
avoid the hostility of a powerful Roman noble like Scipio,
and of his party. The commission therefore came to the
conclusion that Scipio had no share in the crimes com-
CHAP.
vni.
Sixth
Pjbiod,
207-205
B.C.
424
ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK
IV.
Prepara-
tions of
Scipio for
the descent
on Africa.
mitted at Locri, and Pleminius only wafi brought to Eome,
with about thirty of his accomplices. The trial was con-
ducted with great laxity, and Scipio's friends hoped that
the excitement of the public would gradually cool down,
and that by delaying the decision as much as possible
they would in the end secure impunity for the accused.
But this intention was foiled by PlemiDius himself, who, in
his audacious recklessness, went so far as to cause some
ruffians to set fire to Borne in several places during a
public festivity, in the hope of escaping in the general
confusion. * The conspiracy miscarried, and Pleminius was
thrown into the dismal TuUianum, the prison vault under
the Capitol, from which he never came forth again. He
was dead before his trial in the popular assembly came on.
Whether he died of hunger, or by the hands of the
executioner, and what became of his accomphces, is not
known.
The senatorial commission proceeded from Locri to
Sicily, to be convinced by their own eyes of the condition
of Scipio's army. Here they found everything in good
order, and they were able to report to Eome that nothing
was omitted to secure the success of the African expedi-
tion. Scipio had done all in his power to organise and to
increase his army, and to furnish it with all the materials
of war. For this purpose he disposed of the resources of
Sicily without the least limitation,* but, owing to the
obstructive economy of the Boman senate, and its evident
disapproval of the African expedition, he was prevented
from making his preparations as fast as he wished.' The
whole of the year 205 passed away before he was ready.
In the course of it Lselius had sailed with thirty ships to
* This wfts the account given, according to Livy (xxix. 22), by an annalist,
called ClodiiiB Licinius.
' Liv}', xxix. 1 : ' frumentum Siciilomm civitatibns imperat.'
' For this reason the great hurry in the building of the new ships of urar is
hardly intelligible (see abore, p. 419). If these ships reached Sicily so early,
they were useless for a long time. Perhaps the statement of the forty-five
days belongs to the poetical fancies with which the story of Scipio's exploits
was decorated.
B.C.
THE SECOND PUNIC WAR. 425
the African coast, probably for the purpose of concerting CHAP,
measures with Sjphax and Masinissa for the impending — ^ ',..
combined attack on Carthage. But the two Numidian p^^^^
chiefs, as was to be expected,* had ranged themselves on 207-206
two opposite sides. As soon as Masinissa had openly
declared himself in favour of Borne, Syphax was not only
reconciled with Carthage, but closely allied with it ;* and
the first use he made of this accession of strength was to
make war upon his troublesome rival Masinissa, and to
expel him from his country. Accordingly, when Lselius
landed at Hippo, he found Masinissa, not as he had hoped,
in the position of a powerful ally, but of a helpless exile,
wandering about at the head of a few horsemen, and so
far from being able to render active help, that he implored
the Bomans to hasten their expedition into Africa, in order
to rescue him from his position. We do not know what
impression this alteration in the state of things produced
on Lselius and Scipio. By it the hope of Numidian
support was considerably reduced ; especially when
Syphax soon afterwards formally announced his alliance
with Carthage, and warned Scipio against an undertaking
* See aboTo, p. 402 f.
* These vicissitudes in the relations of Sypbax and Masinissa to Carthage
furnished the materials for the romances of the beautiful Carthaginian lady,
Sophonisbe, the daughter of Hasdrubal Gisgo. It is hardly necessary to say
that all these stories are part, not of history, but of those poetical fictions
"with vhich the exploits of Scipio Africanus have been adorned. As before, in
the story of the fair Spanish captive (see p. 356), so we find here also a
gradual growth and development of the fiction from a simple narrative to one
more complicated and elaborate. According to a version, which spems to be
the older one, Sophonisbe was given in marriage to Syphax, in order that he
might be gained for the Carthaginian cause. This is in itself not improbable.
The Carthaginian lady was an honorary present for the royal harem, whereby
the barbarian must have felt flattered. It was then added (Appian, viii. 10)
that Sophonisbe had been previously betrothed to Masinissa, that Masinissa
loved her passionately, and, to revenge himself on Carthage for her loss,
became the ally of Scipio. At a later period of the war, it was said,
Masinissa's love for Sophonisbe revived ; after the defeat of Syphax he took
her to wife, and when Scipio, fearing the influence of her Carthaginian
patriotism on the mind of her husband, demanded that she should be given
up to him, Masinissa made her drink poison. The whole of the story is a fit
subject for a tragedy, and has frequently been dramatised.
426 R03kUN HISTORY.
BOOK in which he would have to encounter not only the Cartha-
IV.
ginians, but also the whole power of Nuinidia.^
Expedition These incidents were in themselves calculated to show
of Mago the difficulties and dangers of an African expedition, and
Minorca, to justify the hesitation of those cautious men of the
Fabian school who shrunk from the bold plan of Scipio.
At the same time the Carthaginians made another de-
sperate effort to keep the Koman forces at home for the
defence of Italy. It does not indeed appear from our
sources that they sent direct reinforcements to Hannibal,
but they would attain the same object if they repeated the
attempt of penetrating with an army into the north of
Italy, and thus threatening Home from two sides. For
this purpose Mago, Hannibal's youngest brother, after the
evacuation of Spain, spent the winter from 206 to 205 in
the island of Minorca, occupied in raising a new army ; and
in the summer of 205, whilst Scipio was busy in Sicily with
the preparations for his African expedition, he sailed with
14,000 men to the coast of Liguria, took Genoa, called upon
the Ligurians and Gauls to renew the war with Rome,
swelled his army with volunteers from their ranks, and
marched into Cisalpine Gaul, in order to advance from
thence southwards as from his base of operations. In
Rome nothing less was apprehended than a repetition of
the danger from which the unexpected victory on the
Metaurus had saved the republic. Again were two sons
of Hamilcar Barcas in Italy, determined, with united
strength, to accomplish the object which they had set
before themselves as the chief task of their lives. Carthage,
far from pursuing the suicidal policy, as has since been
asserted, of leaving Hannibal without support, strained
every nerve to carry out his plans, and even at this
moment, when Africa was threatened with invasion, de-
spatched to Mago a reinforcement of 6,000 foot and eight
hundred horse. From the Roman point of view it was
therefore not an unreasonable wish to keep together as
' Livy, xxix. 23.
THE SECOND PUNIC WAR, 427
mucli as possible the military strength of exhausted liaXjy CHAP,
so that at all risks Rome might be covered before a >, , ,.
decisive attack should be directed against Carthage. PjImod
The decision and firmness of character which Scipio 207-206
exhibited in his opposition to all hindrances and difficulties **^*
mark him as a man of unusual power. He was capable of ^^^J ^''"
bold conceptions, and without heeding secondary considera- Scipio at
tions, he went on straight to the object he had proposed to ^ ^ *""^'
himself. By this concentration of his will he accomplished
great things, though in other respects he did not rise far
above the average level of the military capacity displayed
by Roman generals. The African expedition was due to
him and to him alone. He had planned it when he was
in Spain, and he carried it out in spite of the determined
resistance of a powerful opposition in the senate. Half a
year had been taken up with preparations. Now, in the
spriijg of 204 B.C., the army and the fleet were collected at
Lilybeeum. Pour hundred transports and forty ships of
war crowded the port. The statements of the strength of
the army vary from 12,500 to 35,000 men.* According to
the annalist Coelins, quoted by Livy, the number of men
who went on board the transports was so great that it
seemed that Sicily and Italy must be drained of their
population, and that, from the cheering of so many thou-
sands, the birds dropped from the air on the ground.^ It
can hardly be doubted that such bombastic phrases were
taken from some poetical narrative of the embarkation.
The same poetical colouring can be traced in other features
of Livy's account. When all the ships were ready to sail,
Scipio caused a herald to command silence, and pronounced
a solemn prayer to all the gods and goddesses,^ wherein
* Livy, xxix. 25. • Compare Valerias Maxirous, iv. 8, 6.
' Livy, xxix. 27 : 'Turn Scipio silentio per prseconem facto, ** Divi divjeque,"
inquit, " qui maria terrasque colitis, vos precor qua^soque, uti quae in meo imperio
gpsta sunt, genintur, postque gerentur ea mihi populo plcbique Komanie, Sociis
nominique Latino, qui popnJi Komani quique meam sectam imperium auspicium-
que terra, mari, amnibusquc sequuntur, bene verruncent, eaque vos omnia bene
iuvetis, bonis auctibus auxitis ; salvos incolumesque, victis perduellibusvictores,
spoliis decoratos, prseda onustos triumphantcsque mecam domos reduces sis-
428
ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK
IV.
L&ndinff
of Scipio
in Africa.
he implored them to grant him protection, victory, spoils^
and a happy and triumphant return, after inflicting on the
Carthaginian people all those evils with wliich they had
threatened the commonwealth of Bome. Then he cast the
crude entrails of the sacrificial animal into the sea, and
ordered the trumpets to give the signal for departure.
The walls of Lilybseum and the whole coast on the right
and on the left were lined with spectators, who had
assembled from all parts of Sicily, Qnd followed the fleet
with their hopes and forebodings until it vanished on the
horizon. Many squadrons had lefb Libybseum in the
course of the war, but never such an armada, which carried
with it the vows of all Italy for the speedy termination of
the struggle. Yet, compared with the colossal fleets of the
first Punic war, the fleet of Scipio was almost insignificant.
When the two consuls Marcus Begulus and Lucius Manlius
sailed with their combined armies to Africa in 256 B.C., the
ships of war alone equalled in number the total of Scipio's
fleet, and the army was then twice or three times as large
as now. But in the year 256 Italy had not been wasted,
as in 204, by a war of fourteen yeaTS, and no Boman army
had then perished in Africa. Now it was known what
dangers the legions might have to encounter, and their
fears were consequently intensified for the much smaller
force which had undertaken to revenge Begulus and
Bome.
In spite of the long preparations for the African expedi-
tion, which were well known in Carthage, in spite of the
certainty that it would sail from Lilybseum, and in spite of
the apparent ease with which from the port of Carthage a
fleet might have sailed to intercept the passage of the
tails ; inimicoruni hostiamque ulciscendorum copiam faxitis ; quseque popolus
Carthaginiensis in dvitatem nostram facero molitus est, ea ut mihi populoque
Romano in civitatem Carthaginiensium exempla edendi facnltatem detis.'' '
This characteristic prayer, if not literally spoken by Scipio, is no doubt
such as might have been spoken. It exhibits a language as careful and
precise as that of a lawyer s contract, quite in the spirit of the Roman
religion, which regulated the intercourse between the gods and their people on
the legal footing of stipulations, services, and obligations binding both parties.
THE SECOND PUNIC WAR. 429 '
namerouB transports and to overpower the forty ships of CHAP.
war, Scipio met no resistance on the part of the Cartha- . , '.^
ginians, and landed undisturbed, on the third day, near the ^^«^^th
Fair Promontory, close to Utica.* 204-201
B.C.
Seventh Period of the Hannibalian War.
THE WAB IN AFBICA TO THE CONCLUSION OF PEACE,
204-201 B.C.
The details of the short war in Africa would, if faithfully Character
recorded, be amongst the most attractive and the most {q Africa,
interesting of the whole struggle. We should leam from
them more of the conduct of the Carthaginian people than
from all the campaigns in Italy, Sicily, Sardinia, and Spain.
A veil would be lifted, so that we could look into the interior
of that great city, where the nerves of the widely extended
state met as in a central point. We should see how nobles
and people, senate, officials, and citizens thought, felt, and
acted at the near approach of the final decision of the war.
We should become acquainted with the spirit which moved
the Carthaginian people, and should be able in some measure
to judge what the fate of the old world would have been if
Carthage, instead of Borne, had been victorious. But in
place of a history of the African war, we have only reports
and descriptions of the victorious career of Scipio, drawn
up by one-sided Boman patriotism. Only the great and
' The poetical Darratire of CcbHus (Livy, xxix. 27) dwelt on the dangers of
the Bea, told of storms and shipwrecks, and related that at last the crews
abandoned the sinking vessels and gained the land in boats. Livy's account
also is clearly incorrect. He says that Scipio intended to land on the const of
the Emporiae, i.e. in the Lesser Syrtis, and that ho lost his course, owing to
fogs and contrary winds. We cannot imagine it possible that Scipio intended
to begin his campaign at so great a distance from Carthage as the coast of the
Emporise. Bat if he did, then he would surely not have given up his plan,
and have begun his operations from a place to which mere chance had brought
him. It seems certain that it was Scipio*s intention to begin with taking
Utica, and thus to gain a commodious port for his commimication with Sicily,
and a basis of operations for his advance upon Carthage. It was for this
purpose that he took a complete siege train with him (Livy, xxix. 35, 8), which
would have been of no uso to him in the Syrtis.
430
ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK
IV.
Plans of
Scipio.
iSiege of
Utica.
leading events are ascertainable with any degree of cer-
tainty. The details, which might have enabled us to judge
of the manner in which the war was . conducted, of the
plans, exertions, sacrifices, and losses of both belligerents,
are either entirely lost, or are disguised by party spirit.
At no period of the war do we more keenly feel the want
of a Carthaginian historian.^
Scipio's object, in the first instance, was the gaining* a
strong position on the coast, where, by means of a secure
communication with Sicily, he could establish a firm basis
for his operations in Africa. For this purpose he selected
Utica, the ancient Phoenician colony allied with Carthage,
and situated on the western side of the wide Carthaginian
gulf. During the war with the mercenaries Utica had fallen
into the hands of the enemies of Carthage, but after the
suppression of the rebellion she was again most intimately
connected with Carthage. In spite of the burdens which
the campaigns of Hannibal imposed on the Carthaginians,
as also upon their allies and subjects, we hear of no revolt
or discontent on their part, such as broke out in Italy
among the Capuans and among many others. Up to the
time of the landing of Scipio, it is true, the Bomans had
only appeared on the African coast now and then, to ravage
and plunder rather than to make war. No Roman
Hannibal had established himself in the interior of the
country, or challenged the allies to revolt from Carthage.
For this reason Scipio might entertain the hope that, after
the great exhaustion and the innumerable troubles of the
war, the subjects of Carthage would be ready to revolt
now, as they had been during the invasions of Agathokles
and Regulus. Perhaps he thought thus to obtain easy
possession of Utica.
But it appears that the state of things in Africa was
this time different. The reason is unknown to us; but
the fact is certain that Scipio found among the Cartha-
ginian subjects no readiness for revolt or ti'eachery.
* Arnold {Hiit. of Borne, iii. 449) says justly, • Wherever the fiimily of
Scipio is concerned, the impartiality of Polj'bius becomes doubtful.'
THE SECOND PUNIC WAR.
481
TJtica had to be besieged in due form, and it offered such
determined resistance that the siege — which lasted, with
occasional pauses, almost to the conclusion of peace,
that is, nearly two years — remained without result. If
Scipio had been so fortunate as to take TJtica, many par-
ticulars of this remarkable siege would no doubt have
been preserved. But the Eoman chroniclers passed briefly
over an undertaking which contributed in no way to swell
their national renown, and the Carthaginian writings,
which would have exhibited in a proper light the bravery
of the Uticans, are unfortunately lost. We know there-
fore but little of an event which was of the very greatest
importance to the war in Africa, and what has been pre-
served cannot be considered authentic in detail, because it
comes from Soman sources.
After Scipio had landed his army, he took up a stroug
position on a hill near the sea, and repulsed the attack of
a troop of cavalry, which had been sent out from Carthage
to reconnoitre, on the news of a hostile landing.^ He then
sent his transport ships, laden with the spoils of the sur-
rounding open country, back to Sicily, and advanced to
TJtica, where, at the distance of about a mile from the town,
he established his camp.^ After a short time the transport
ships returned from Sicily, bringing the remainder of the
siege train, which Scipio, from want of room, had not been
able to take with him before. The siege wa^ now begun,*
and it appears to have lasted the whole summer without
* Some writers made of this single eDgagement two battles, in each of
which a Carthaginian general of the name of Hanno was taken. On this
occtision Livy (xxix. 86, 2) remarks : *Duo8 eodem nomine Carthaginiensium
duces duobns equestribus proeliis interfectos non omnes anctores siint, veriti,
credo, ne falleret bis relata eadem res.* Ccelius and Valerius knew how to get
over this difficulty. They related that one of these Hannos was not killed,
but made prisoner, and afterwards exchanged for Masinissa's mother. This
old lady had to play her part in the fables of the African war. She was a
prophetess, and helped to discover a conspiracy against Scipio. — Zonaras,
ix. 12.
■^ Livy, xxix. 34, 3.
'• Livy, xxix. 35, 6 : * Ad oppugnandam Uticam omnes belli vires convertit,
cam deinde si cepisset sedem ad cetera exser)netida habiturus.' Compare
Appian, viii. IG.
CHAP.
VIII.
Sbvrntii
Fbriod,
204-201
B.C.
Vigorous
resistance
of the
Uticans.
432 ROMAN HISTORY.
any considerable interruption.^ Scipio took up his
position on a hill close to the walls of the town, and
attacked them with all the appliances of the ancient art
of siege. The trenches were filled up by mounds of earth ;
battering-rams were pushed forward under protecting
roofs to open breaches, and at the same time ships were
coupled together and towers for attacking the sea walls
were erected on them. But the defence was still more
vigorous than the attack. The Uticans undermined the
mounds, so that the wooden structures on them were
thrown down; by letting down beams from the walls
they weakened the blows of the battering-rams, and made
saUies to set the works of the besiegers on fire. The
whole of the citizens were inspired by the spirit which,
half a century before, had rendered Lilybeeum impregnable.
When towards the end of the summer, as it appears, the
Carthaginian army under Hasdrubal^ advanced, united
with a Numidian army under Syphax, Scipio found him-
self obliged to raise the siege. He confined himself now,
as Marcellus had done before Syracuse, to occupying a
fortified camp in the neighbourhood, from whence he
could observe Utica, and at any time begin a fresh attack.
This camp, known even in Caesar's time as the ^ Cornelian
* Livy's statement, that it lasted forty days, is probably to be understood of
the period of actual assault, and does not include the time required for the
preliminary -works.
» This was Hasdrubal (Gisgo*s son), who distinguished himself in tho
Spanish campaign, and was, after Hannibal and his brothers, the most eminent
of all the Carthaginian generals. It is highly characteristic of the sources
from which the account of the war in Africa is taken, that Appian (viii. 9)
seriously reports that the Carthaginians, upon the news of Scipio's armaments
in Sicily, dispatched this Hasdrubal to hunt elephants {M Oripw ike4>dirr»w
i^hnfATTuy). Mommsen accepts this statement as simple truth (Bom. Gesck.
i. 662 ; English translation, ii. 182) as if the Carthaginians had had no better
employment for their principal general than to go out on a hunting expedition.
To judge of the probability of the fact, we should bear in mind that elephants
are found wild only in that part of Africa which is south of the great desert
of Sahara. The Carthaginians obtained their supply probably from the
Senegal, by ship. In spite of the statements of JElian {Nat, Animal, x. 1 ) and
of Pliny {Hist. Nat. yiii. 11), we cannot believe that elephants were ever found
in a wild state in Mauritania. The climate and vegetation of the country
make it impossible.
THE SECOND PUNIC WAR. 483
camp,' was on the peninsula which runs eastward from chap.
Utica towards the sea. Scipio here drew his ships ashore ^^*
to protect them, and so he passed the winter nncomfort- ^^^jwth
ably enough, enjoying only this advantage, that, being 204-201
in communication with Sicily and Italy, he was preserved "•^*
from want by the continual conveyance of supplies, arms,
and clothing, and was enabled to collect together means
for the next campaign* Hasdrubal and Syphaz en-
camped in the neighbourhood, and it appears that during
the winter (204 to 208) nothing of importance was under-
taken on either side.*
On Scipio's landing in Africa, Masinissa immediately Alliance of
joined him, at the head of only two hundred horsemen.' ^•^"*'**
He was, as has been already mentioned, expelled from his Sdpio.
kingdom by Syphax and the Carthaginians. His adven-
tures, which Livy relates in detail,* correspond exactly to
the circumstances under which the Berber races lived for
centuries, and live stiU. Some chief holds hereditary
authority over a tribe. A dispute with a neighbour drives
him, after a short struggle, to take flight into the desert.
He returns with a few horsemen, collects a troop of
followers around him, and lives for a time on plunder.
TTiH band grows, and with it grows his courage. The men
of his tribe, and the old subjects of his family, flock around
him. The struggle with his rival begins anew. Cunning,
dissimulation, treachery, courage, fortune decide who shall
keep the mastery, and who shall suffer imprisonment, flight,
or death. Such a struggle is never decided until one of
the two combatants is killed ; for no dominion is established
on a flrm basis, and the personal superiority of the one
who is to-day vanquished may, without any material cause,
become to-morrow dangerous to the conqueror. Thus
Masinissa, although a dethroned prince, was nevertheless
a welcome ally to the Bomans. In addition to this,
he was not a mere barbarian. To the cunning and
* Livj, xxiz. 29. According to some statements he had 2,000 men with
him. This dirergence is a sample of the nnsatisfactoiy character of the souxces
for the narrative. • Livy, x ix. 29, 33.
VOL. 11. F P
434
ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK
IV.
Destrac-
tion of the
African
camps.
cruelty, to the perseverance and the wild audacity of the
barbarian, he added a knowledge and experience of the
arts of war which gaye him an immeasurable superiority
over others of his class. He had been brought np in
Carthage, had served for several years under the best
generals in Spain ; he knew the military organisation and
politics of the Carthaginians, their strength and their
weakness, and he had long foreboded their inevitable
downfall. For this reason, and not, as has been said, ont
of chagrin at the loss of a Carthaginian lady-love, he
espoused the cause of the Eomans. He knew that only
from them he could obtain the secure possession of his
paternal heritage, and an extension of his power over the
Numidians ; and he never doubted the realisation of his
plan, even when, as related, he lay defeated and wounded
in a cavern of the desert, and when his life was saved only
by the devoted attentions of a few faithful followers.
The value of the advice and assistance of Masinissa was
soon made evident to the Romans. He alone could have
originated the scheme of setting fire in the night to
the enemy's camp. Masinissa knew the style of building
adopted in the Numidian and Carthaginian camps, which
consisted of wooden huts covered with rushes and branches,
and he, as a Numidian, knew best how to surprise and attack
the Numidians. Hasdrubal and Syphax were encamped,
during the winter, at a short distance from each other and
from Utica, and awaited, as it appears, the opening of the
campaign by Scipio, whose fortified camp they dared not
attack. The strength of the Carthaginian army is reported
to have been 33,000 men, that of the Numidians 60,000,
among whom were 10,000 horsemen. Scipio pretended
that he wished to enter into negotiations for peace, and
sent during the truce his most skilful officers as
messengers to the camp of Syphax, who had undertaken
to act as mediator between the Bomans and Carthaginians.*
* According t» Valerius Antias, quoted by Livy (xxx. 3), Syphax came
himself into the camp of Scipio. The stories of such personal interviews
were in great favour with a certain class of writers. They afforded exceUent
THE SECOND PUNIC WAE. 435
But the negotiations were a mere pretence. Scipio wished CHAP,
to get accurate information as to the position and arrange-
ments of the enemy's camp. He now gave notice of a ^''^**
renewal of hostilities^ and acted as if he were going to 204-201
renew the attack upon Utica. Seeing the enemy in *'°'
perfect security, he made a night attack^ first on the
NumidiaiL and then on the Carthaginian camp. He suc-
ceeded in setting fire to both, in penetrating to the interior,
and causing a terrible slaughter, killing, according to
Livy's report, 40,000 men, and capturing 5,000. Polybius^
represents the success of the Bomans as still greater,
saying that of the 93,000 Carthaginians and Numidians
only 2,500 escaped, and calling this the grandest and
boldest exploit that Scipio ever carried out.^
If th^ losses of the Carthaginians had been anything like Defeat of
the numbers reported by the Scipionic accounts, we should ^^^^^^
expect that Utica must have surrendered immediately. Syphax.
But Utica remained firm, and in the course of thirty
days, a new Numido-Carthaginian army of 30,000 men,
under Hasdrubal and Syphax, stood in the field.' Among
these there were 4,000 Spanish mercenaries, who had only
just arrived in AMca. Scipio was obliged once more to
interrupt the siege of Utica and to march against this
army. He gained a complete victory on the so-called
* Large Plains,'* after which Sjrphax, with his Numidians,
opportunities for composing speeches and displaying rhetorical skill. They
calminate in the interview of Scipio and Hannibal before the final battle of
Zama. Compare above, p. 403. ' Polybins, ziv. 5.
' This opinion is rather strange, as it seems to place the surprise near
TJtica above the great victory of Scipio over Hannibal at Zama. The night
attack was, after all, not an honest open fight, but a stratagem worthy of a
barbarian like Masinissa; and the losses of the Carthaginians are palpably
exaggerated. Unless we suppose that they were not only struck deaf and
blind, but at the same time paralysed and unable to run away, we cannot
understand how 40,000 (not to speak of the 90,000 of Polybius) could be
killed like sheep in a pen. There were, however, several divergent reports of
the whole affair. According to Appian (viii. 19-23) Scipio attacked only the
camp of Hasdrubal ; while Syphax, who was encamped at a short distance,
hearing of Hasdrubal's disaster, retreated on the following day without loss.
Compare also Zonaras, ix. 12. ' I^ivy, xxx. 7.
* Polybius, xiv. 8,2: MeydJ^a ircSta. Livy, xxx. 8 : * Magni campi.' The
locality is unknown.
F F 2
436 ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK separated himself from the Carthaginians, and returned
^^ ,' - to his own dominions.
Capture of ^^ ^^^ ^^ ^o^ come when Masinissa could prove
gyphax by j^ yalue as an ally. Strengthened by a Roman detach-
ment under Lselius, he followed Syphax to Numidia. The
eastern part of this country, the land of the Massylians,
which was contiguous to the Carthaginian frontier, was
Masinissa's paternal kingdom. Here he was welcomed
with enthusiasm by his former subjects and companions-
in-arms. IVom an exUe he became, all at once, again a
powerful sovereign. His power grew daily. He had the
good fortune not only to conquer Syphax,* but (what was of
much more importance) to take him prisoner, and thus
with one blow to put an end to the war in Numidia.* The
importance of this event can hardly be rated too high. Up
to this time Scipio's success, in spite of the two victories,
had been far from decisive. Now, however, the power of
Numidia was no longer arrayed against him, but ranged
on his side, and Carthage was obliged to carry on the war
against two allies, each of which alone was a match for her.
Defeat of Notwithstanding this unfortunate turn of affairs, the
flee?*bythe ^^ Continued with unabated vigour, and only a few
Cartha- yoices in Carthage were heard wishing for peace. Han-
nibal, the invincible, was still in Italy with his armj,
and his brave brother Mago was in Gkiul, ready to co-
> According to Appian, Masinissa and Syphax met in single combat. Com-
pare what has been said p. 434, note.
' Cirta, the capital of Nnmidia (the modem town of Constantine) snrren-
dered when Syphax was exhibited before the walls in chains. In Cirta, the
royal treasures feU into the hands of the conqueror, as well as Sophonisbe,
the Carthaginian consort of Syphax. The tragical story of this second
Helen went on to relate 'that Masinissa, upon seeing her, felt his old love
reTive, and took her to wife forthwith ; that Scipio feared that her influence
on Masinissa would estrange him from the cause of Bome, just as she had
convert«d Syphax from an enemy to be a friend of Carthage ; that Scipio
accordingly demanded her surrender, and that, to prevent it, Masinissa offered
her the poisoned cup, which she drank with dignity and courage. It is
much to be regretted that the ancient historians dwelt with particular pre-
dilection and at full length on such Tagaries of fancy, whilst they relate the
most important events superficially and negligently. Compare above, p. 425,
note 2.
B.C.
THE SECOND PUNIC WAR. 437
operate with him. Dxuing the long time since his landing CHAP.
Scipio had not even been able to conquer Utica. How w , ' ^
could he think of attacking the mighty Carthage? It is ^^
true, a detachment of the Eoman army had advanced into 204-201
the neighbourhood of Carthage and had taken possession of
Tunes, which the Carthaginians had voluntarily evacuated ;
but this march upon the capital of the empire made no
more impression on it than Hannibal's appearance before
Bome had made upon the Eomans. While Scipio lay in
Tunes, a fleet of a hundred ships^ left the harbour of
Carthage, to attack the Boman fleet before Utica, and
Scipio was obliged to return thither with all haste. As he
had applied his ships of war to carry the machines employed
in the siege, and had thus made them useless for a naval
battle,^ he could not go to meet the Carthaginian fleet, but
had to keep on the defensive. He. lashed his ships of
burden together in a line four deep, and manned them,
like a sort of camp rampart, with his land troops. Of the
result of the battle that ensued we have but a garbled
report, made for the purpose of representing the losses of
the Eomans as slight as possible. Livy says that about six
Boman ships of burden were detached and carried away ;
according to Appian one ship of war and six ships of
burden were lost.' The losses of the Bomans must, how-
ever, have been much more considerable, as Scipio found it
advisable to relinquish entirely the siege of Utica.* Having
made an attempt to take Hippo, and meeting with no
' Appian, ylii. 24. This fleet carried also a detachmeDt of land troops.
* Liyy, zxx. 10 : ' Qui enim restitissent agili et nautico instrumeato apt»
et armatie dassi naves, tormenta machinasqneportantes, et aut in onerariarum
nifum Terste aut ita appulsa ad muros at pro aggere ac pontibus prsebere ascensus
possent ? '
* It is clear that Appian*s statement (viii. 30) has reference to the fight in
question. There existed, however, another report still less unfavourable to
the Romans, of which Appian has also availed himself (viii. 25). According
to this report^ the Carthaginians suffered great losses and retired, towards
evening, in total exhaustion, whereupon the Romans issued from the port, and
towed away as prize an abandoned Carthaginian vessel. Zonaras (ix. 12) makes
the battle last two dayR, which enables him to utilise both reports ; on the
first day, he says the Romans beat off the attack of the Carthaginians, but on
the second they were considerably worsted (wo\b ^XAam^0-«y).
* It is only Appian that relates this (viii. 40). The omission, by Livy, of
438
ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK
IV.
Negotia-
tions for
peace.
better success, he set fire to all his siege-works and engines^
and occupied himself for the remainder of the year in
marching through the Carthaginian territory, and enrich-
ing his soldiers with the spoils.
In spite of the late success against the Roman fleet, the
conviction, since the defeat and capture of Syphax, became
more and more general in Carthage, that the resistance
against Roman invasion could no longer be continued
with the existing forces.* The democratic war party was
obliged to retire from the government, and to leave to the
opposition the task of negotiating with Borne for peace.
The successes of Scipio had not up to this time been such
as to enable him to oppose the conclusion of a peace on fa.ir
terms. He possessed the natural and just ambition not to
leave to his successor the glory of bringing the long war to
a close, and he therefore agreed with the Carthaginian
ambassadors on preliminaries of peace, which were to be
presented for approval to the senate and people of Rome as
well as of Carthage. It was agreed that the Carthaginians
should give up all prisoners of war and deserters, should
recall their armies from Italy and Gaul, resign Spain and
all the islands between Africa and Italy, deliver all their
ships of war but twenty, and pay 5,000 talents as a con-
tribution of war, and moreover a sum equal to double
the annual pay of the Roman army in Africa.*
It is plain that, in this preliminary treaty, the conditions
this most significant circumstance suffices to give a wrong colouring to the
whole narratiTe.
' Liyy, zzx. 16: ' Carthaginienses non brevi solum, sed prope vano gaudio
ab satis prospera in pnesens oppugnatione classis perfusi, post famam capti
Sjphacis, in quo plus prope quam in Hasdrubale atque exercitu suo spei
reposuerant, perculsi .... oratores &d pacem petendam mittunt.*
' There is some difference in the statements of the terms proposed, with
regard to the sum of money. Appian gives it as 1,600 talents. Livy says
(xxx. 16): 'Pecunis summam quantam imperaverit, parum convenit: alibi
quinque millia talentum, alibi quinque millia pondo aigenti, alibi duplex
stipendium roilitibus imperatum invenio.' Whereas 6,000 talents would be
more than a million pounds, 6,000 pounds of silver would be about 16,000/.
What the double pay for the troops amounted to is doubtful, especially as the
length of time for which the pay was to be given by the Carthaginians is not
staled. From the analogy of other instances, we may guess that a year's pay
THE SECOND PUNIC WAR. 439
of a peace and those of an armiBtice have been mixed np CHAP.
together. The demand of pay for the Boman troops for ^ ,-L-*
the duration of a truce had long been customary. This ^^^"
money was paid immediately by the Carthaginians.^ In 204-201
the same manner the evacuation of Italy by the Cartha-
ginian army was certainly a condition preliminary to the ^^J^e °^"
negotiations for peace, i.e. a condition of the armistice. It armiatice.
could not possibly be the intention of the Eomans that,
while the armies were at rest in Africa, the war should
still be carried on in Italy. We know very well that the
greatest desire of the Boman people was the withdrawal of
Hannibal from Italy.' We also know that the senate, on
principle, negotiated with no enemy for peace so long as
hostile troops were in Italy.' It is therefore certain that
the recall of Hannibal and Mago, which in a treaty of
peace was a matter of course, belonged not to the con-
ditions of peace but to those of an armistice, and this
supposition is absolutely necessary if we wish to under-
stand the conduct of the Carthaginians on the renewal of
hostilities, which took place soon after.
When the Carthaginian ambassadors reached Bome, seceptiou
Lcelius had just been there with the captive Syphax and an ®/ ^^® p^^'
embassy from Masinissa, and both senate and people had ambassa-
convinced themselves, by personal observation, that Car- ^J^*'
thage, deprived of her most powerful ally, would not be in a
position to carry on the war much longer. This accounts
for the contemptuous treatment which the Carthaginians
met with in the senate. Although the Boman prisoners had
been abeady released, in the expectation that the conditions
vas demanded. Such a payment was the UBiial condidon of an annistice.— ^
See LiTj, viii. 2 ; Tiii. 86 ; iz. 41.
' Appian, Tiii. 31.
' When Hannibal did leare Italy, a thank-offering of 120 laige* animals
was made, and a festival of fiye days celebrated (Livy, xzz. 21), and the
senate and people yoted to the old Fabius a crown of grass. — Pliny, SRst. Nat,
zxii. 6, 10.
' According to Zonaras (iz. 13) the senate refased to admit the Cartha-
ginian ambassadors until this condition should be complied with. — Compare
Dion Cassius, figm. ix. 153.
440 BOMAN HISTORY.
BOOK of peaxse would be accepted,' the ambaflsadors were not
— ,'„> admitted before the senate till after the departure of
Hannibal and Mago from Italj.^ Then new difiBlculties
were raised. According to the report of Livy the peace
was not ratified, and the Carthaginian ambassadors
returned home almost without an answer.* Polybius says
that the senate and people in Bome approved the conditions
of peace/ J£ this last report be true, some alterations in.
the treaty must have been proposed in Bome, on the
acceptance of which by Carthage the peace depended.
On this supposition only can we understand how in Bome
and in the Scipionic camp the peace could be considered to
be concluded, while in point of fact the war continued up
to the time when Carthage would have consented to the
proposed alterations.
Eec^ and i^ Carthage there had been for some time past a grow-
Mago. ing opinion that Hannibal ought to be recalled from Italy,'
but before entering into negotiations for peace with Scipio
the senate had adhered strictly to its old plan of keeping
the enemy occupied in his own country. When the
Boman expedition to Africa was in contemplation, Mago
had received a considerable reinforcement,^ had marched
from Genoa over the Apennines, and had again roused the
Gauls to renew the war against Bome. He met in the
country of the Insubrians a Boman army of four legions,
under the prsetor P. Quintilius Varus and the proconsul
M. Cornelius Cethegus; and in the battle which ensued the
Bomans could hardly have been victorious, as they own to
heavy losses and do not boast of having taken any
prisoners. Mago, however, was severely wounded, and this
mishap was sufficient to cripple his movements. Under
these circumstances the order reached him from Carthage
to leave Italy. He returned to Genoa and embarked his
' According to Liv7(xxx. 16) the Carthaginians restored only 200 prisoners ;
according to Dion Gassins (frgm. Id3) they sent them all back.
' This is particularly evident from the narrative uf Dion Cassius (frgm. 153)
' Livy, Z2Z. 23 : ' Legati pace infecta ac prope sine responso dimissi.'
* PolybiuSi XV. 1, 4, 8.
• Livy, XXX. 9. ■ See above, p. 426.
THE SECOND PUNIC WAR. 441
Rrmy, but died, in consequence of his wounds, before he CHAP.
reached Africa.' His army, however, arrived, without s. . ^
hindrance or loss, clearly under the protection of the plJ^J^
armistice. 204>20i
The time had now come when Hannibal was at last ^'^
obliged to renounce his long-cherished hopes of over- l^^ons
throwing the Eoman power on Italian soil. The last balwith
three years brought him one bitter disappointment after '5 Ma»S
another. Aft^er the defeat and death of Hasdrubal and the donia.
loss of Spain, one faint hope still remained — a vigorous
participation in the war on the part of Macedonia. But
this hope also disappeared. King Philip did nothing to
carry the war into Italy, and confined himself to keeping
the chief power in Greece and conquering a part of Illyria.
The Eomans had since 207 devoted but little attention to
aiEa^irs on the east of the Adriatic Sea, and when, in the
year 205, they could not prevent the hard-pressed -SJtolians
from concluding a peace with Philip,' they did the same,
and in order to satisfy the Macedonian king, they resigned
to him a part of their possessions in Illyria.' Afber this,
a new prospect opened for Hannibal. The march of Mago
to the north of Gaul was the last attempt which Carthage
made to carry out Hannibal's original plan. It was under-
taken with great energy, and seemed to promise success,
when the negotiations for peace put an end to it. As
for Hannibal's strategy in the last years of the war, it
' Whoerer is tolerably funiliar with the character of Boman descriptionfl of
hatUee cannot fail to see that Mago was Tictorious in his last engagement
with the Boman legions. Livy (xzz. 18) finishes with the remark ' that the
battle would have lasted longer if, by the wound of the Carthaginian leader,
Tictory had not been acknowledged to be on the Boman side.' No lost battle
ends like this. If the severely wounded Mago had been defeated, it is quite
evident that the four legions must have pursued and overtaken him on the
long march from the Milanese to Genoa. But the Oarthaginians were not
even harassed on their march. This can be explained only by the circum-
stance that their march was undertaken in consequence of an order horn home,
and not of a defeat. According to Livy's narrative, it happened by the merest
chance that the order to return reached Mago, when he had already deter-
mined to return, and was actually engaged in embarking his troops. Such a
coincidence is possible, but hardly probable.
* See above, p. 414. ' Livy, zxiz. 12.
442 ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK was confined to defending that comer of Italy which he
IV.
* still occapied, and the area of which was growing less from
year to year. How Locri was lost has already been re-
lated. Hannibal's last stronghold was Croton. From that
place he still defied the Boman legions, and sacceeded,
when hard pressed, in inflicting serious losses.^ At no
period does the generalship of Hannibal appear in a more
brilliant light.* How he succeeded, with the scanty rem-
nants of his victorious army, with the pressed Italian
recruits, emancipated slaves and fugitives, without any
other resources than those which the small exhausted land
of the Bruttians afforded, in keeping together an armed
force, animated with warlike spirit, severely trained to
discipline and obedience, supplied with arms and other
necessaries of war — ^an army which was capable not only of
steady resistance, but which repeatedly inflicted on the
enemy bloody repulses — ^this the Boman annalists have not
related. If they had been honest enough to represent in
true colours the greatness of their most formidable enemy
in his adversity, they would have been obliged also to paint
the incompetence of their own consuls and praetors, and to
confess with shame that they had not one single man able
to cope with the great Punian.
The bronze Hannibal, as if he had had a foreboding of his enemies'
Haimfbal. 1^^® ^^ detraction, made use of the leisure which their fear
granted him to record his exploits in Italy. Like all
great men, he was not indifferent to the judgment of
posterity, and he foresaw that this judgment must be
unfavourable to him if it rested on Boman reports alone.
' LiTy, zzix. 36, 4. *The Roman writers have recorded victories over
Hannibal too mendadons for themselves to believe * (Arnold, Hiti, of Rome^
iii. 443). A sample of snch lies is found in Livy xxx. 19, where the author is
honest enough to remark : * Obscura eius pugnse famn est. Valerius Antias
quinque millia hostium csesa nit, qusB tanta res est, ut aut impudenter ficta sit,
aut negligenter preetermissa/ In the spirit of the oldest annals, the same
event is related several times ; for instance, the taking of Consentia three
times (Livy, xxv. 1 j xxix. 38 ; xxx. 19) ; that of Clampetia twice (Livy,
zxix. 38 ; xxx. 19).
Livy does not say a word too much in the beautiful passage (xxviii. 12) in
which he expresses this opinion.
THE SECOND PUNIC WAK.
443
CHAP.
VIII.
Skventh
Pbbiod,
204-201
B.C.
He therefore caused to be engraved on bronze tablets in
the temple of Juno on the Lacinian promontory, near
Croton, an account of the principal events of the war, in
the Greek and Punic languages. These bronze tablets
Poljbius saw and made use of, and we may be sure that
the most trustworthy accounts of the second Punic war
were taken from this source. Unfortunately the history of
Polybius is completely preserved only for the period ending
with the battle at Cannse. Of the latter books of
Polybius we have mere fragments, the only complete and
connected account of the Hannibalian war being that of
Livy, who unhesitatingly made use of the most mendacious
Eoman annalists, such, for instance, as the impudent
Valerius of Antium. Thus the memoirs of Hannibal are
for the most part lost to us, owing to the same cruel fate
which persecuted him to his death and even after his
death ; and Bome not only prevailed over her most formid-
able enemy in the field, but her historians were enabled to
obtain for themselves alone the ear of posterity, and thus
to perpetuate to their liking the national triumph.
Thus alone can it be explained that historians, even up slanderous
to the present day, have recorded, as Hannibal's last act in ^^^H
Italy, a crime, which, if it deserved credit, would place Hannibal.
him among the most execrable monsters of all times. It
is affirmed that he ordered those Italian soldiers^ who
declined to follow him into Africa to be murdered in the
sanctuary of the Lacinian Juno, and that he thus violated
with equal scorn all human feelings and the sanctity of the
temple.* We have had already an opportxmity of refuting
charges such as these,' and we do not hesitate to call this
accusation a gross calumny. The act cannot be recon-
ciled with Hannibal's character. He was not capable of
> According to Dicdoms (xxrii. p. Ill, Tauchnitz) tbeir number was 2,000.
Livy (xxx. 20) says they were * many.'
' Appian (rii. 58) adds that Hannibal caused those Italian towns which
were still in his possession to be plundered, for the purpose of satisfying his
army, and that this gave occasion to murders, violation of women, the capture
of men, and all the horrors to which towns taken by storm are exposed.
* See above, p. 252.
444 BOMAN HISTORY.
BOOK gratoitous cruelty, and it would have been nothing but gra-
IV.
^ tuitous cruelty^ to massacre the poor Italians, who could
have been of no use to him in Africa, and could do him no
harm if left; in Italy. We cannot believe that Hannibal,
who before his march over the Pyrenees dismissed many
thousand Spaniards to their homes because they showed
unwillingness to accompany him, would now have acted
so differently in Italy. If Italian soldiers met their death
in the sanctuary of Juno, it was much more likely that they
were men who, like the noble Capuans before the taking
of the town, preferred to die a voluntary death rather
than allow themselves to be tortured by the Romans in
punishment of their rebellion.*
^cai? o^ Hamilcar Barcas, obeying the call of his country, had,
from Italy, forty years before, left the theatre of his heroic deeds, un-
conquered. If, with heavy heart, he discharged a motimfol
duty, he had at least hopes of a better future for his
people. He devoted his life to bring this better future about.
Now his son, greater and mightier than he, had sought^ in
a fifteen years' stru^^le, to solve the father's problem, and
the end of his effoS L,d of his glorions 5ctories was
that he also had to bow his head before an inexorable fate.
The anguish of his soul can be imagined only by those
unhappy men who have seen before them the down&ll of
their fatherland, and who loved it and lived for it like
Hannibal. He obeyed the order which recalled him, and
was ready now, as ever, again to try the fortune of battle ;
but when he surveyed the progress of the war, and con-
templated the continually increasing preponderance of
' According to Appian (vii. 59) indeed he butchered these men, lest they
should ever become useful to the Bomans.
' The speech which Livj (xxx. 20) makes Hannibal deliver on his departure
from Italy, is too absurd to deserve serious criticism. Nevertheless it has
found a place in almost all histories of the war, and it may therefore be
worth while to refer to it at least in a foot-note. In it Hannibal laments that
the Carthaginian government, from jealousy and envy, left him without
suppprt, and had not shrunk from risking even the safety of Carthage
itself, so that they might overthrow him. The whole course of the war is an
uninterrupted refutation of these views, which have been sufficiently discussed
bove, p. 161, note 1.
THE SEC0N1> PUNIC WAR. 445
power on the side of Eome, he could scarcely entertain chap.
any other hope than that of mitigating to some extent ^ r-^
the fate which was inevitable. PmoD^
With the best men of his army Hannibal sailed from 204-201
Croton in the antmnn of the year 203. He held his
course, not direct to Carthage, but, probably in consequence Hannibal
of a tbrmal stipulation in the armistice, to Leptis, ahnost at Leptis.
on the extreme southern boundary of the Carthaginian
territory, where he was as far as possible removed from
the Boman and Numidian armies and frt)m the capital.
To the same place, as it seems, came the army of Mago
from Genoa, and Hannibal spent the winter there in com-
pleting his army and providing it with horses, elephants,
arms, and all necessaries, so that, in case of a failure of the
peace negotiation, he could renew the war in the follow-
ing year.
The peace was not concluded. We have aheady seen Fsilnre of
that the Eoman senate delayed the Carthaginian embassy ^1^^
until the hostile armies had left Italy, and then ratified tions.
the treaty of peace only afber introducing certain altera-
tions. This intelligence reached Carthage before the
embassy itself had returned.' All hopes of peace at once
vanished, and instead of complete reconciliation the
greatest animosity was felt. The democratic party had
been in favour of war fr^m the beginning, had conducted
it vigorously in spite of the opposition of an aristocratic
minority, and had reluctantiy submitted to the necessity
of accepting conditions of peace. Now this party again
had the upper hand, after the more moderate men and
the friends of peace had been foiled in their attempt to
make peace with Bome on equitable terms. It has often
happened that in a supreme crisis, when foreign enemies
have threatened the existence of a state, an internal
revolution has suddenly broken out, and that a nation,
believing itself betrayed, has fallen a victim to ungovem-
' This follows from a comparison of events in their internal connexion of
canse and effect.
446
ROMAN HISTORy.
BOOK
IV.
Shipwreck
of a
able fury and blind passion.* It was tbus in Carthage.
The advocates of peace were now persecuted as traitors
and foes of their country, and the government fell again
entirely into the hands of the fanatical enemies of Borne.
Hasdrubal, the son of Gisgo, according to all appearance
a moderate man and by no means on principle an opponent
of the family of Barcas, had till now conducted the war.
After Hannibal he was the most distinguished general
that Carthage possessed, and it was necessary that the
negotiations for peace with Scipio should be conducted by
him. The people, disappointed in their hope of peace, now
turned their rage against this man.^ He was recalled from
the command and condemned to death, on the charge of
having mismanaged the war and of having had treacherous
dealings with the enemy. The high-minded patriot suf-
fered the iniquitous sentence to be passed, and continued,
although condemned and outlawed, to serve his country.
He collected an army of volunteers, and carried on the
war on his own account. But after all he fell a victim to
the unreasonable hatred of the populace. He ventured
to show himself in the town, was recognised, pursued, and
fled to the mausoleum of his own family, where he eluded
his pursuers by taking poison. His body was dragged out
into the street by the populace, and his head carried about
in triumph on the top of a pole.
After such an outbreak of fury against supposed in-
* An illustration in point is the murder of the brothers De Witt in
Holland in 1672 ; and whilst these lines are written (September 8, 1870) we
can witness the action of the same force in Paris : the defeat of Napoleon is
followed by an internal revolution.
' This combination, it must be confessed, rests on coi^jecture alone. Accord-
ing to Appian (viii. 24) Hasdrubars trial took place earlier, viz., after the
catastrophe which befell him in conjunction with Syphax, when his camp was
burnt (p. 434 f.). But this statement is evidently false, for Polybius and Livy
speak of Hasdrubal as commanding the Carthaginian army in the battle on the
' Laige Plains ' (p. 435, note 4), a battle wliich Appian does not refer to. Neither
Polybius nor Livy relate the accusation and death of Hasdrubal, but their
silence would not justify us in condemning the detailed narrative of Appian as
entirely fictitious. Livy has passed over many interesting details, and the
narrative of Polybius may be among the lost chapters.
THE SECOND PUNIC WAR. 447
temal enemies^ it may easily be imagined that the populace CHAP.
of Carthage were not very conscientions in the observance > , \^
of the law of nations towards the Eomans. The truce, as ^J^J^"
the Soman historians report, had not yet expired when 204-201
a large Boman fleet, with provisions for Scipio's army, ^'^'
was driven ag^ainst the coast in the Carthasfinian bay, and ^™*° .
^ ° . convoy in
wrecked before the eyes of the people. The town was in the bay of
a state of the greatest excitement. The senate consulted ^^'
as to what was to be done. The people pressed in among
the senators and insisted on plundering the wrecked
vessels. The government determined, either voluntarily
or tinder compulsion, to send out ships to tow the stranded
vessels to Carthage. Whether and how this resolution was
carried out may be doubtful ; but thus much is certain, that
the Boman ships were plundered, perhaps by the licentious
populace, without the authority or approval of the govern-
ment. Scipio sent three ambassadors to Carthage,
demanding satisfaction and compensation. The embassy
received a negative answer, and the attempt was even made
on the part of Carthage to detain them as hostages for the
safety of the Carthaginian ambassadors who were still in
Bome.' This attempt failed. The three Bomans escaped,
with much difficulty. Scipio, instead of retaliating,
allowed the Carthaginian ambassadors, who shortly after-
wards fell into his hands on their return from Italy, to
leave his camp unmolested. After all hopes of an imme-
diate peace had vanished, he prepared for a renewal of
the war, which now, since Hannibal was opposed to him,
had assumed a far more serious character.^
' Appian, viii. 34.
' No event in the war has been so thoroughly misrepresented as the so-
called breach of the truce by the Carthaginians. Some Eoman writers were
anxious to show, by a striking example, that the charge of faithlessness, so
universally brought against the Punians, was well founded, and in their
patriotic seal they Tied with each other in making the most atrocious charges.
Though Folybius (xy. 2, § 15) and Livy (xxx. 25, 8) admit that the Roman
ambassadors returned safe to Scipio, Appian (viii. 34) relates that some of them
were killed (kcI r&y irpdirfitdy rtytt ix To|«vfuiTwy i,w40atny). As there were
only three ambassadors, the expression * some of the ambassadors ' can hardly
be justified, and the reading is probably corrupt. Perhaps irp^(r/3€«y has to be
448 ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK What has been said already with regard to our imper-
^ , ' ,^ feet knowledge of the war in Africa applies especially to
Operations ^^^ period between the landing of Hannibal and the battle
of Hanni- ^bt Zama.' Livy and Polybins say nothing at all about it,
MiuiiDissa. SO that we cannot understand how the hostile armies, at
the distance of a five days' march, encounter each other to
the west of Carthage* Fortunately we find some indicar-
tions in Appian and Zonaras, derived from an independent
source, which enable us to form a proximate notion of the
course of the campaign. It appears from these indica-
tions that the war was brought to a close through the
Numidians and in Numidia. From Leptis Hannibal had
marched to Hadrumetum, where he spent the winter.
But instead of marching from this place to Carthage, and
against Scipio, he turned in a southerly direction, towards
Numidia. He considered it his first duty to restore
Carthaginian influence in this territory, to weaken Masi-
nissa, and to draw off its forces to the Carthaginian side.
Hannibal secured the support of some Numidian chiefs,
especially of Yermina, the son of Syphax ; he succeeded
in defeating Masinissa, in taking several towns, and
in laying waste the country. Hereupon Scipio marched
from Tunes, where he had taken up his position for
the second time, and came to relieve his ally, threaten-
ing Hannibal on the east, whilst the Numidians were
changed into iwifiar&w. It would take too long to point out all the contra-
dictions in the several statements. They strike even the superficial reader.
If we had the Carthaginian version, we should probably learn that the
Bomans were not so innocent as the lamb in the fable, and that the Cartha-
ginians were not so demented as to give their overpowering enemies a pretext
for renewing a war the termination of which they were prepared to poichase
with great sacrifices. We surmise that the Carthaginians did not provoke
hostilities until they knew the resolution of the Bomans to continue the war ;
and we have no reason to doubt that a state like the Carthaginian respected
the law of nations at least as much as the Bomans, and that accordingly the
alleged violation of it by the populace of Carthage was justified by acts on the
part of the Bomans. If we recollect the story of the Caudine Passes, we
shall feel persuaded that Borne did not scruple to accept the benefits of an
armistice without performing the conditions stipulated in it.
> Compare TJ. Becker, Vorarheiten eu einer GescMchte des rweiten pwiiscken
KriegeSt p. 186 ff.
i
THE SECONIX FUNIC WAR. 449
advancing against him from the west. Hannibal was CHAP,
worsted in a cavalry engagement near Zama, one of his
commissariat trains was cut off by the Bom'ans nnder the ^^?*™
legate Thermus, and, after fruitless negotiations for peace, 204-201
the decisive battle at last was fought.^ "'^
The uncertainty of the history of this last year's cam-^ The so-
paign is strikingly characterised by the fact that neither the ^^^ .
time nor the place of this battle is exactly known* One Zama.
thing is certain^ that the battle of Zama, as it is called in
history, was fought, not at Zama, but several days' march
to the west of it, on the river Bagradas, at a place the
name of which is given di£Ferently by different authors, and
which was perhaps called Naraggara. The date of the
battle is also uncertain. Not one of the extant historians
names even the season of the year. On the authority of a
statement in Zonaras' that the Carthaginians were ticrrified
by an eclipse of the sUn, the 19th of October has been fixed
upon as the day of the battle, as, according to astrono-^
mical calculations, an eclipse of the sun, visible in North
Africa, took place on that day in the year 202 b.c.^
This calculation agrees perfectly with the course of events
as it appears probable from the narratives of Appian
and Zonaras ; for the campaign in the wide deserts of
Numidia may very well have lasted through the whole
summer of that year.
The battle of Naraggara, which, in order to avoid a
^ The story of an Interview of the two leaders is probabljr nothing but ond
of the idle inventions in Which the history of the Funic war abounds, from
the time that Scipio took a leading part in it. It is not taken from the con-
temporary annals, but &om one of the poetical or rhetorical works on the
subject. If more was preserved of the poems of Ennius than the few scanty
fragments which were noted down by the later grammarians for the curious
or antiquated words they contained, we should probably be able to traoa-
back to him a great number of these fictions. They originated, for the most
part, in the family circle and among the clients of the Scipios, and had already
gained consistency when Polybius obtained in this quarter his materials for
the history of the Hannibalian waf.
' Zonaras, ix. 14.
' This date agrees with the statement of Livy (xxx. 30), according to which
the Kumidian chief Vermina attacked the Bomans qfier the battle, on the
first day of the Saturnalia, t.s. in the month of October*
VOL* II. o a
450 EOMAN mSTOEY.
BOOK misunderstanding, we must call the battle of Zama, is
% — ,1^ described in detail by Polybius and by Livy, After
what we have said above, of the inaccuracy of these authors
as to the war in Africa, it would hardly be worth while to
copy their battle-pieces here, however much we may | desire
to have a true picture of this battle, which, though it
did not decide the issue of the seventeen years* war —
for this had been long decided — ^yet brought the long
struggle to a close. But the battles of the ancients,
compared with those of modem times, were so easy to
survey; their battle-fields, even when the greatest forces
fought, were so small, and the battle array and tactics of
their troops so xmiform and simple, that it was not impos-
sible to obtain a clear conception of the course of a battle ;
and where there was no intention to deceive, the accounts of
eye-witnesses maybe received as, on the whole, trustworthy.
Disposi- According to Appian' Hannibal brought into the field
t^^^"" 60,000 men and eighty elephants, Scipio 84,500, without
forces. counting the Numidians whom Masinissa and Dacamas, an-
other Numidian chief, had brought to his aid. According to
the account of Polybius,* both armies were equally strong in
infantry. HannibaPs army consisted of three different corps,
drawn up one behind the other in a treble line of battle. In
the first rank were placed the mercenaries, the Moors, the
Gauls, the Ligurians, the Balearic contingent, and the
Spaniards ; then, in the second line, the Libyans and the
Carthaginian militia; and in the third line the Italian
veterans, mostly Bruttians. The eighty elephants, drawn
up before the front, opened the attack on the Eomans. In
cavalry the Eomans were superior to Hannibal, by the aid
of their Numidian auxiliaries.' It appears that Hannibal's
Numidian ally Vermina had not arrived with his troops on
the day of the battle.^ He did not attempt an attack on
■ Appian, Tiii. 41. * Polybius, xv. 14, § 6.
* Besides his Italian cavalry, Scipio had 4,000 Numidian hone, under
Masinissa. — ^Xivy, xzx. 29.
^ The nntrustworthiness of the Kumidians, as of their aUies in general, and
of their mercenaries, was the principal element of the weakness of the Cartha-
ginians. What strong reasons Hannibal had for mistrusting the Numidiana
THK SECOND PUNIC WAR. 461
the Bomans until after the battle, and was then defeated CHAP,
with a loss of 16,000 men.* - ^™- -
The Boman legions were generally drawn np in three ®"""*"
lines, in manipnli or companies of 120 men each, in such a 204>20i
manner that the manipuli of the second line, the principes, ^^'
came to stand behind the intervals left by the manipuli ^Vf ^**
of the first line, the hastati, and that on advancing Boman
they could form one unbroken line with them. The ^^°^'
manipuli of the third line, the triarii, were half as strong as
those of the two first — sixty men each ; but they were formed
of veterans, the most trusty soldiers in the legion. They
were again disposed so that in advancing they filled up
the intervals in the second line* The different manipuli
were therefore drawn up like the black squares of a chess-
board. The light troops, armed with spears and intended to
open the battle, skirmished before the first line and retired
into the intervals between the maniptdi, as soon as more
serious fighting began. The cavalry stood on both wings*
This battle array was almost as invariable as the order of the
camp, and the Boman generals had but little opportunity
for tiie development of individual tactics. Still Scipio is
said to have deviated from the usual rules at Zama. Instead
of drawing up his manipuli like the black squares of a
chess-board, he placed them one behind the other, like the
rounds of ladders. This was intended to leaVe straight
openings, through which the elephants might pass with-
out trampling down or tearing asunder the infantry
battalions. Hie elephants seem to have been of little use
to the Carthaginians; but we do not know whether on
account of this manoeuvre, or for some other reason, a
number of them, driven aside by the Boman skirmishers,
18 eYident from the Btatement of Appian (riiu 38), that he caused 4,000
Numidiana, who had joined him aa deserters from Kastnissa, to be pnt to
death. May we not presume that, even after such a harsh and wholesale
punishment, there were stiU traitors in his army? Bnriog the battle, 300
Spaniards and 800 Numidians deserted to the enemy (Appian, viii. 48). Such
a treason during ihM batUe^ is alone sufficient to account for the defeat of
Hannibal. We hear also that in the battle the foreign mercenaries turned
upon the Carthaginians.— Folybius, xv. 13, § 4. Liry, zzz. 34.
' Livy, zzz. 36.
o o 2
452 BOMAK mSTOBY.
BOOK threw the CartJiftginiaTi cayalrr into such disorder that
IV
_ ' ^ thej were unable to resist the attack of the Boman and
Nmnidian horse. After a long and obstinate conflict, the
first Boman line, the hastati^ threw the Carthaginian
mercenaries back npon their resenres, the Libyan and
Punic troops. It is even said that the latter came to
blows with the fugitiTes, either in consequence of mutual
distrust, or treason, or because bj Hannibal's orders the
national troops tried to drive the venal and cowardly mer«
cenaries back into the fight. At any rate the confusion
which thus ensued was most fortunate for the Romans.
8cipio advanced with his second and third lines, and
attacked Hannibal's veterans, who alone preserved good
order and were able to offer further resistance. The
combat raged long and fiercely and without approaching
a decision, until the Boman and Numidian cavalry, re-
turning from the pursuit of the Carthaginians, fell upon
the enemy's rear and thus decided the battle.
Complete The defeat of the Carthaginians was complete. Their
theOtftha- ^^-""^y ^^^ ^^* ^^7 routed but destroyed. Those who
giniftoi. escaped from the horrible slaughter were for the most part
surrounded and taken prisoners by the victorious cavalry.
The battle was in many respects a parallel to that of
Cannffi, and it was especially by the bravery of the legions
of CanncD that this victory was gained, and that the
military honour of the Boman soldiers was retrieved.^
For Scipio the battle of Zama was a double success.
It put an end to the war, and it secured for him the glory
and the triumph. If the decision had come only a short
time later, Scipio would have been obliged to share the
> Not more probable than the personal interview of Hannibal and Scipio
hrfor$ the battle is their meeting hand to hand during the battle, and the single
combat of Hannibal and Maeiniasa, both of which are serionelj related
(Appian, Tiii. 45, 46; Zonarae, ix. 14). We can see that the writen of
historical romance omitted no opportunity for disoovering and painting poetical
situations. The statements of the losses on both sides vsry as nsnal, and are
not to be tmsted. According to Polybius (zr. 14, | 0), the Romans lost more
than 1.600 killed, the Carthaginians more than 20,000, and almost as many
prisoners. According to Appian (viii. 48), the Romans lost 2,600 men, Masi-
nissa somewhat more ; the Carthaginians 26,000 killed, 8,600 prisoners, and
1,100 deserters.
THE. SECOND PUNIC WAR. 459
command-in-chief in Africa with his snccesson Tiberius CHAP.
Claudius Nero, one of the consuls for the year 202, was
Sbtbntk
already on his way with a consular army, . and only bad ^^^^
weather had delayed his passaged Hence it appears 204-201
certain that, even if the battle of Zama had ended dif-
ferently, the war might indeed have been prolonged, but the
final result would have been the same. The Carthaginians
had indeed long been overcome, and in all their battles
and exertions of thelast few years, especially since the battle
at the Metaurus, th^y were prompted more by the reck-
lessness of despair than by wellrfounded hope of victory.
Hannibal had not seen his native town since ha had Hetumof
gone to Spain with lii3 father as a boy nine years old. S*5«.^
He was not destined, after an absence of siz-and-thirty ^''fi^*
years, when he had filled the world with his glory, to come
back as a triumphant victor.^ He returned, after the
destruction pf the last Carthaginian army, to tell his
feUow-citizens that not only tha battle hrA the war was
lost. His t^sk was now to secure the nu>st fitvourable
conditions ip, the unavoidable peace* His return, and the
continuance of his authority and influence in Carthage,
sufficiently prove that he had always acted by the orders
andhad entered into the views of ttie Carthaginian govern-
ment. If it had been true that he had begun and carried
on the war out of personal motives, or even against the wish
of his fellow-citizens, he would hardly have dared now to
appear in a eity wherie .unisucceq^ful generals, even when not
guilty of criminal contumacy, were in danger of crucifixion.
From Zama, Scipio had marched directly upon Car-r Policy of
thage, whilst a fleet of fifty ships which had just arrived ^P'®»
under Lentulus tluHsatened the town from the sea* But
the siege of so welL-fortified a town 0.S Carthage could not
be extemporised, and Scipio's attacks on Utica and Hippo
could hardly have given hiqi hopes of rapidly ending the
» Livy, XXX. 89.
' This is the more general statement, with which, howeyer, a passage in
Livy (xxi. 3) does not agree, according to which Hannibal spent his youth in
Carthage, nntil his brother-in-law* Hasdmbal, after the death of Hamilcv
Barcas, sent for him to come to Spain. . '
454
ROMAN mSTOBY.
BOOK
IV.
State of
parties in
Carthage.
war by the capture of Carthage. The importance of a
fortified capital was much greater in ancient than in
modem times* How often, for instance, had the wave of
an invading army been broken by the walls of Syracuse,
after the Syracusan armies had been routed, and the
whole of their territory overran. Thus even Carthage,
trusting in the strength of her position, could now enter
into negotiations with Borne as a power not yet subdued^
Scipio was prepared, more than any other Soman could
be, to grant favourable conditions ; for he knew that
a hostile party in the Boman aristocracy was endeavour-
in g to bring about his recall before the conclusion of the
treaiy, in order to deprive him of the honour of ending*
the long war' by a glorious peace. This party was sup-
ported, not by the people of Bome, but by the senate, and
could easily now, .as on a former occasion, retard the
negotiations and finally make them abortive. In the be-
ginning of the year a vote of the people had intrusted
Scipio with the command-in-chief in Africa, but never-
theless the senate had, on its own authority, dispatched
the consul Tiberius Claudius Nero with a fleet, and
had co-ordinated him with Scipio in the command.*
Nero had been detained by contrary winds, and had not
reached Africa. The same opposition against peace
and against Scipio was again exhibited after the battle of
Zama. The newly elected consul Cn. Lentulus was impa-
tient to undertake the command in Afirica,* and whilst
Scipio ?ras conducting the peace negotiations, violent dis-
cussions and dissensions took place in Bome, which at last
led to the decision that Lentulus should be intrusted with
the command of the fleet, and that, if peace was not con-
cluded with Carthage, he should sail to Africa and there
undertake the command'-in*chief of the fleet, whilst Scipio
should retain the command of the land forces.
In Carthage also there were, even after the battle of
* For Bome the war had lasted sixteen jears (218-202 b.c.), for Carthage
one year longer, if the siege of Saguntnm is reckoned.
» Livy, jox. 27. • Livy. xzx. 40.
TH£ SECX)ND FUNIC WAS. 455:
Zama, some fanatics who would still have continued the CHAP.
war with Borne. We are told that Hannibal with his own * -
hands palled down from the platform one of these dema- |^^**
gogues that was attempting to inflame the populace, and 204-201
that the people forgave its deified hero this militaiy con- ''^'
tempt of civil order. It is equally creditable to Hannibal
and the democratic party in office during the whole of the
war and to their political opponents, the aristocratic peace
party, which had now to conduct the negotiations with
Bome, that they arrived at a friendly understanding, and
joined in common measures for the public weal.
We hear of no revolution in Carthage, not even of out- Tems of
breaks of rage and despair directed against the supposed ^^*^'
authors of the national calamity- The senate sent a de-
putation to Scipio, and it seems that the negotiations were
resumed without any difficulty on the basis of the con-*
ditions which had once already been accepted. In some
points, certainly, they were made more severe. Scipio
required of Carthage the surrender of all elephants, of all
ships of war but ten, the payment of 10,000 talents iu
ten years, a hundred hostages between fourteen pjid Ijxirty
years of age, and (what was most serious of all) the engage-
ment that she would wage no war either in Africa or else-
where without the permission of the Bopoan people. By the
acceptance of this condition Carthage evidently renounced
her claim to be an independent state, and admitted that her
safety and her v^^ existence were at the pleasure of Bome.
Still the chance of battles had decided, and after the Trnoa for
preliminaries of peace had beisn accepted, Scipio granted ^^"^^tt^
a truce for three months, which Carthage had to purchase
with a sum of 25,000 pounds of silver, ostensibly as a com-
pensation for the Boman ships that had been plundered
during a former truce. In addition to this the Cartha-
ginians had to pay and provision the Boman troops during
the truce, while the latter in return refrained from plunder-
ing the Carthaginian territory.^ Hereupon a Carthaginian
> On Una, as ou a former occasion (compare above, p. 430), the oonditions
of peace are not kept snfficientlj distinct from the terms of the armistioerr
JAvy, zzz. 37.
45^ HOMAN HISTORY.
BOOK embaa^ was sent to Borne for the purpose of obtaining^ fbzr
/ - this peace the sanction of the senate and of the Bomaxi
people.
Joy in The news of Scipio's yictorj at Zamahad been receiTedL
the tidiDgB ^ Bome with boundless enthusiasm. When the legate Ij.
of Scipio's Veturius Philo had delivered his message to the senate,
victory,
he was obliged to repeat it on the Forum before the*
assembled people, as on a former occasion the messengers
had twice to proclaim the news (^ the yictorj on the
Metauros. All the temples of the town were opened for
a festive rejoicing of three days. The crowd had long^.
desired peace in vain, and now came peace accompanied by
victory. The new consul Cn. Lentulus and his party in
the senate vainly attempted once more to delay the con-
clusion of peace.* The pressure exerted by the popular
party and by Scipio's adherents was too great. The people
did not wish to be cheated out of their hopes of peace, nor
would they allow their favourite Scipio to be deprived of
the credit of victory. They resolved, on the motion of two
tribunes of the people, that the senate should conclude the
peace with Carthage through P. Scipio, and that none other
than he should bring back the victorious army to Bome.
A commission of ten senators was a^ once sent to Africa
to communicate this decision, and to give to Scipio their
counsel and assistance. As «. proof that with the con-i
elusion of peace all hatred and dissension were to be put
aside, the Carthaginian ambassadors were allowed to.
choose two hundred of their countrymen who were in
Bome as prisoners and to take them home without any
ransom.
^*^<^- • In Carthage the news of peace was not received with
Cartha- equal joy, however desira})le it might appear to the people,
gmmn rj]jQ surrender of the Boman prisoners to the number of
4,000 was no act of free generosity, but a confession of
defeat that had been extorted from them. The pecuniary
sacrifices which they had to make were felt still mora
' Livy, szx. 43 : ' Inclinatis omniom ad pacem animiB, Cn. Lentulus codbuI
^ • . senatas coosulto intefcesait,*
THE. SECOND PUNIC WAB. 457
painfallj. But Trhen the Carthag^ian fleet was towed CHAP,
out of the harbour and fired within sight of the town, -. , ' /,
such a lamentation arose as if, with these wooden walls ^^^
of the mistress of the seas, the town itself were delivered 204-201
to the flames.* ""^
For Scipio nothing remained to be done in Africa but Rewanils
to diBpenfle reward and pumshmant. Directly after the JrC^
yictory over Syphax he had, before the ji»ssembled armj, lussa.
decorated Masinissa with the crown, sceptre, and throne,
with the embroidered toga and tunic, as ally and friend of
the Roman people*^ The senate approved of this dis-?
tinction bj a regular resolution.' Scipio now added
the most valuable gift to these dplendid and glittering
decorations, bj bestowing on Masinissa a part of the king-
dom of Sjphax, which they had conquered together, and
its capital, Cirta. But the cautious Boman politicians
conld not plaee full confidence in the barbarian. Thej
found it advisable to leave a rival by his «ide, and there-
fore they restored to Yermina^p the son of Syphax, a part of
his father's kingdom, in spil^ of his hostility during the
late war. Tbe punishment of the deserters delivered
np by Carthage fonned the bloody epilogue to this
war. The Latins amongst them were beheaded, and the
Boman citizens, deemed deserving of a severer penalty,
were crucified.*
Scipio's journey to Sopxe was an uninterrupted triumphal Triumph
procession. IVom IMjbesum he sent a considerable part of ®^ ^^^P^^*-
his army by sea io Ostia ; he himself travelled by land
through Sicily aud somthem Italy^ Everywhere the people
of the towns and fillages came out to meet him, and wel-
comed him as victor and deliverer. His entry into Bome
was celebrated by thousands of Boman soldiers whom he
had delivered from Carthaginian captivity, and who loudly
extolled him as their saviour. It must remain doubtful
> Livy, XXX. 43. • Li?y, xxx. 16. * Livy, xxx. 17.
* Livy, XXX. 43. Yaleriiu Maximns, ii. 7, 12. It is possible that the
Bomans borrowed from the CarthaginiauB the Onental pauishment of cruci-
fixion.
458 ROMAK HI8T0BY.
BOOK whether the Nomidian king Syphax walked before his
tw. .,' f triumphal car; for« though Polybins affirms this, Livy states
distinctly that he had previously died at Tibur.^ On the
other hand we may take for granted, even without any
particular testimony, that the legions of CannsB, which
had been so undeserredly punished, more for their
misfortune than their fault*, pow brilliantly established
themselves in the esteem of their fellow-citizens, as they
marched as conquerors behind the triumphal chariot
of the general who by their arms had obliterated the
disgrace of Cann9,
GENERAL BEMABES ON THE HANNIBALUK WAB, ETC. 459
CHAPTER IX*
GEKEBAIi BEMABES ON TEE HANNIBALIAN WAB AND THE
COBBESPONDINO PEBIOD.
The second Punic or Hannibalian war has always justly chap.
attracted the special attention of historians. Apart from
the thrilling events, the grand military operations and Kealngni-
efforts both of the Romans and of the Caxthagmians, and ficance of
the surprising vicissitudes of this great war— apart from ^^JT""
the personal sympathy which Hannibal's deeds and suf- ^"'
ferings inspire, and the dramatic interest which is thus
imparted to the narrative, we cannot fail to see that this
struggle has been of the greatest importance in the
history of human civilization, and therefore deserves the
most careful study. Not only did this war, the second of
the three waged between Rome and Carthage, bring about
the irrevocable decision, but by this decision the question
was settled whether the states of the ancient world were
to continue to exist separately, in continual rivalry, in
local independence and jealousy, or whether they should
be welded into one great empire, and whether this empire
should be founded by the Grseco-Italic or by the Semitic-
Oriental race. It cannot be doubted that, if Rome instead
of Carthage had been completely humiliated, the Punic
empire and Punic civilization would have spread to Sicily,
to Sardinia, and probably even to Italy,' and that for cen-
turies it would have determined the history of Europe.
What would have been the result of this consummation,
whether the development of the human race would have
> Polybins, xr. 9, } 5 : Ob yup rnr Aifi^s aMjtt o&5l riis Zhp^mnis ifuXXow
iofpu^iw oi rf fJxf (as Zama) ttpcniffamts iMJk luX rSh $\Xmw fitpihf r^t
olKOV|Un|t, tea yur ir^tMctr dv6 r\w yroptar.
460 BOMAK HISTORY.
BOOK been impeded or advanced, we cannot attempt to decide.
Oar imperfect knowledge of the national mind and char-
racter of the Carthaginians prevents ns from giving an
opinion. Historians are generallj satisfied with the
supposition that the victory of Rome was equivalent to the
deliverance of the Grseco-Italic mind from Oriental
stagnation and intellectmal oppression, and this conviction,
which at any rate is consoling, may make onr sympathy
with a great and glorious nation less painful ; but it can
in no way diminish the importance which we justly
ascribe to the Hapnibalian war. We miast pronounce Livy '^
right in his opinion, that, of all wars that had ever been
waged, this was the most noteworthy; and, as Heerea
justly remarks, the nineteen centuries that have passed
since Livy wrote bave not deprived it of it? interest.'
Th,B«». ThiB interest i8 owing in g^atpaxt to the fortnmatecir-
Li^ cumstance that for the Hannibalian war the continuous.
PoWbius, I narrative of Liyy gjid the val^iable fragments pf Polybiua
^ftoriau. enable us, more than hitherto in Bon^n history, to examine
the inner working of the powers which this war put in
^notion. Having parted witb Livy before the close of the
third Samnite war, at the end of his tenth book? we have
missed his not always trustworthy, but still useful, guidance
during the war with Pyrrhus, and .ajso during the first
Punic and the Gallic and Illyrian wai:$, where we found a
piost valuable substitute in the short sketches of Folybius*
Then with the siege of Saguntum, we take up again the
narrative of Livy in the twentj-first book of his volumi-
lious work, ten books of which relate the events of every
year to th,e conclusion of peace, someti^ies with unneces-
sary breadth and with rhetorical verbosity, afid not with*
out omissions and errors, but i^till with conscientious use
of such historical evid^^oe as be had at his command, and
in language the beauty of which is unsurpassed in the histo-
rical literature of Kome. For the first two years of the war
we have, in addition to Livy's narrative, that of Poly bins,
' JAvjt iLjfi. I ; ' Bfillwm maxime omninm mirabile qm uaqjtam gegta sunt.'
* Soo Heeren, Staaten dc$ AlUrthumBg p. 396*
GENERAL REMAKES ON THE HANNIBALUN WAR, ETC. 461
wHich leaves hardly anjtiiing to be desired as regards CHAP,
clearness, credibility, and sound judgment, but of which, _ / -
unfortunately, for the remainder of the war, only a few de-
tached fragments are preserved. There are also many par-
ticulars to be gleaned from the fragments of Dion Cassius
and the abridgment of his work by Zonaras. Even Appian's
narrative, though based on false views and full of the gross-
est exaggeration, is not useless when critically considered.
In addition to these, Diodorus, Frontinus, and others occa- *
sioually help us; but, in spite of this comparative abundance
of authorities, we are conscious that in the Hannibalian war
there remain many unsolved problems and difficulties with
respect to numbers, places, and secondary events, and also
that we are in the dark as to many of the conditions of
success, and as to the intentions and plans which determined
on a large scale the action of both the belligerent powers.
The main cause of the superiority of Borne over Car- Re<il
ihage' we have found in the firm geographical and ethno- Koman^
graphical unity of the Boman state as compared with the ■???"
chequered character of the nationalities ruled over by
Carthage, and in the disjointed configuration of its terri-
tory, scattered over long lines of coast and islands; The
history of the war shows us clearly how these fundamental
conditions acted. Whilst Carthage, by the genius of
her general and by the boldness of her attack, thwarted
the Boman plans and destroyed one army after another,
the fountain of the Boman power, the warlike population
of Italy, remained unexhausted, and flowed more freely in
proportion as Carthage found it more and more difficult
to replenish her armies. Thus the war was in reality
decided, not on the field of battle, as the Persian war was
decided at Salamis and at Platsea, nor through the genius
of a general and the enthusiastic bravery of the troops, by
which small nations have often triumphed over far supe-
rior foes. It was decided long before the battle of Zama
by the inherent momentum of these two states, which
entered the lists and continued to fight, not with a part of
* See abore, p. 6.
462 BOMAN HISTORY.
BOOK their forces only, but with their whole strength. As,
.^ , ' ,^ often, between two equally matched pugilists, the victory is
decided not by one blow or by a succession of blows — ^the
question being who can keep his breath longest and
remain longest on his legs — so, in the conflict between
Bome and Carthage, not skill and courage, but nerve and
sinew, won the victory.
The The advantage involved in the geographical conforma*
fortrewes. ^on of Italy was increased by the surprising number of
strong places, and by the circumstance that the capital of
the country, the heart of the Boman power, was situated,
not at one extremity, but in the centre of the long penin-
sula. The difficulties which the Italian fortresses opposed
to Hannibal's progress appear on every page of the history
of the war. These difficulties were the more serious as
the art of siege was comparatively unknown in antiquity,
and particularly in Carthage. Thus we see how, even in
Guul, the cities of Placentia, Cremona, and Mutina,
though hardly fortified) defied the enemy during the whole
course of the war, and formed a barrier towards the north.
Of the many Etruscan cities, not one fell into Hannibal's
power. After the battle at the lake Thrasymenus even
the small colony at Spoletium could resist him. In
Apulia, in Samnium, Lucania, and Bruttium we hear of a
great number of fortified places, otherwise unknown, bat
which in this war, if they did not fall by treason, were
able to disturb the march of the victorious enemy. We
know more of the Greek towns, and of the fortresses in
Campania ; and if we remember how Hannibal's attacks on
Naples, on Cumse, Nola, and Puteoli failed, and how the
little place of Casilinum could for months oppose a despe-
rate resistance to the besieging army, we can easily un*
derstand that the conquest of Italy was a very different
undertaking from that of the Carthaginian territory,
where, with the exception of a few seaports, there were only
open towns, a rich and easy spoil for any aggressor.
The importance of the central position of Borne is self-
evident. That position prevented Hannibal from cutting off
GENERAL BEMARES ON THE HANNIBALIAN WAR, ETC. 468
the whole of Italy at once from Borne, and at the same time CHAP,
nniting all the peoples against Bome. He had to choose - ^' -
either the northern or the sonthem part of the peninsnla
as a basis of operations ; and when he took up a position in
Apnlia and Brattinm he lost his commnnication with Ganl.
The maintenance of this commnnication was rendered ex-
tremely difficnlt by the narrowness of the peninsnla ; and
thns we see why the transport of Grallic anxiliaries for
Hannibal's army ceased after the first years of the war,
and how Hannibal had then to rely npon the resources of
the sonth of Italy alone. We need hardly remark how
nsefnl this central position of Bome was in the decisiye
moment of the war, during Hasdmbars invasion, nor
how it facilitated the yictory on the Metanrus. The same
circumstances were repeated after Mago's landing at
Genoa, and it may well be doubted whether, even under
the most favourable conditions, Mago would have been
able to effect a junction with Hannibal for the purpose of
making a combined attack on Bome.
If we can hardly suppose that the Carthaginians were Reasons
ignorant of these circumstances, which were all in febvour ^J^.
of Bome, the undeviating persistency with which they ginjan in-
continued to attack Bome frt)m the north of Italy is itaiy from
the more surprising. That it was impossible, or even the north,
dangerous, to transport an army by sea to the south
of Italy we cannot suppose. The landing of Mago on the
coast of Liguria would completely invalidate such a sup*
position, and still more the landing of Scipio's army in
the immediate neighbourhood of Utica. The ships of the
ancients drew so little water that they could approach
almost any part of the coast, and it was by no means
necessary to be in possession of a fortified harbour before
they could venture to disembark troops. The ships could
be drawn on shore and protected from attacks of the
enemy ; and, indeed, the Boman fleet had, during the three
years' war in Africa, no other protection but that which
was afforded by such a fortified camp of ships. We can
think^ of no other reason for the attacks of Hannibal^
464
ROMAN mSTORY.
BOOK
IV.
Naval
inactivity
of the
Cartha-
ginians.
Hasdmbal, and Mago from tlie north of Italy but the
hope of gaining Grallic auxiliaries, and this very circam-
stance betrays the scantiness of the resources upon which
Carthage drew for the recruiting of her armies.
It is more difficult to understand why she almost
entirely abstained from vigorously carrying on the war at
sea. In the first war several great naval battles were
fought, and the decision was brought about by the victory
of Catulus near the ^gatian Ishmds ; but in the second
Punic war the importance of the fleet appears surprisingly
diminished, both on the Boman and on the Carthaginian
side. Not one great battle was fought at sea. Even the
number of ships which Bome employed on the wide battle*
field on the coasts of Spain, Gaul| Liguria, Italy, Sicily,
Corsica, Sardinia, and in the East^ was in no year equal
to the number of those that fought at Ecnomus alone.
Further, whilst in the Sicilian war the quinqueremes had
almost entirely taken the place of the triremes, we now
again find triremes frequently mentioned. Sepeatedly we
hear of the ships being ^thdrawn from service, and the
troops that manned them being employed for the war on
land. If we are surprised to hear this of the Homans,
who owed so much to their former success at sea, and
who were so justly proud of it, it is stiU more surprising
with regard to Carthage. The Bomans had been attacked
and could not determine whether land or sea should be
the theatre of the war. They were obliged to meet
Hannibal on land, and as long as they remained on the
defensive they could not pay much attention to the naval
war ; but why Carthage neglected her fleet, and did not
make better use of her superiority as mistress of the seas,
the absence of Carthaginian historians makes it impossible
for us to explain. It must have been possible, we might
suppose, to intercept the Boman transports of troops and
materials of war that were sent from Italy to Sardinia
iftnd to Spain, and particularly those that were destined
for Africa, or at any rate to make this conveyance very
difficult. Yet we hear but little of the capture of Boman
GENERAL REMARKS ON THE HANNIBALIAN WAR, ETC. 465
convoys by Carthaginian ships.' The Roman fleets sailed CHAP,
in every direction ahnost unmolested. In the decisive - _ / ^
operations of the war, the Carthaginian navy made no
attempt to take an active part. In fact during the siege
of Syracuse their fleet actually declined a battle with
the Romans, and thus brought about the loss of that im-
portant town. Further, we flnd Scipio landing unopposed
almost within sight of Carthage, and if the Roman trans-
ports sometimes suffered from storms, they were never
attacked by Carthaginian cruisers. They sailed with the
greatest regularity, almost as in times of peace, and during
the first winter provided the Roman army with all neces-
saries at a time when it must have perished without such
supplies. The minute description of unimportant naval
conflicts, as for instance that of one Carthaginian quinque-
reme and eight triremes against one Roman quinquereme
and seven triremes, is an indirect proof of the decay of
both navies.' Nor is this an exceptional case. In the
Greek states the old naval superiority had long disappeared.
The Achseans and the royal successors of Alexander could
launch no fleet that would bear comparison with those of
the Hellenic republics when at the height of their power.
It produces a melancholy impression when we read how
the Achaean league sent out a fleet of ten ships against the
pirates of Ulyria, and that King Philip, having borrowed
five war ships of them,' at length determined to build a
fleet of a hundred ships.^ Whilst the old rulers of the
sea retired exhausted, the barbarian pirates became
bolder and bolder, and their armed/ boats swept the seas
and the coasts where once the proud triremes of the free
Greeks had reigned supreme.
In the absence of all information which might enable Prubabie
us to account for the diminished importance of the Car- Jhe*d©«iv '
thaginian fleet, this neglect of their naval force may of the
perhaps be explained partly by the &ct that Hannibal and ginian '
navy.
' Compare p. 213. • Livy, xxviii. 36.
• Livy, xxvii. 30. • Livy, xxviii. 8.
VOL. II. H H
466
BOMAN HISTORY.
BOOK
IV.
Boman
military
organisa-
tion.
Length-
ened
term of
military
service.
his brothers, and eyen, before them, Hamilear Barcas,
the chief moyers and leaders of the war, had deyoted
themselves by preference to the war by land, and excelled
in this branch of military science. They were persuaded
that Borne must be attacked and subdued in Italy.
They therefore naturally advocated the application of all
the national resources to the army, and their advice was
always followed in Carthage. No doubt they were right
in this, and Carthage would probably have been exhausted
much sooner if she had divided her strength between the
army and the fleet more than she actually did.
The military system and organisation of the Bomans
underwent no important changes during the Hannibalian
war ; but a war which put so great a strain on the national
resources could not fail to bring about some innovations.
We see more clearly than before the first signs of a stand-
ing and of a mercenary army, and the gradual formation
of a class of professional soldiers distinct from the civil
population ; and, in connexion with this, we find serious
symptoms of moral decay. In the first Punic war it was
still the rule to disband and dismiss the legions at the
end of the summer campaign. This system, rendered
inconvenient by the great distance of the theatre of the
war in Sicily, could not be universally carried out without
abandoning the island during the winter to the Cartha-
ginian armies and garrisons. But still the Boman
military system, which required every citizen to serve in
turn, made it necessary periodically to reconstitute the
legions; and, in the absence of higher considerations,
the peasants and artisans were not veithdravni fix)m their
families for more than one or two campaigns.
The carrying out of this arrangement became more and
more difficult during the Hannibalian war, first because the
exhausting levies made it impossible regularly to relieve
the troops, then because the peril of the republic whilst
Hannibal was in Italy called for a standing army, and
lastly because the regular renewal of the legions in distant
GENERAL REMAEKS ON THE HANNIBALIAN WAR. ETC, 467
Spain would have caused too mnch expense. In addition CHAP,
to this, the legions defeated at Cannse and at Herdonea
were sent to Sicily with the intention of punishing them
for their conduct, bj retaining them under arms until the
end of the war. Whilst the legions stationed in Italj
were less frequentlj relieved than formerly, the armies
of Spain and Sicily consisted chiefly of veterans, of whom
many had served as much as fourteen years. These
soldiers were, evidently, very different from the old militia.
They had become estranged from civil life; war had
become their profession, and from war alone they de-
rived their support and boped for gain. The Soman pay
was not, as with a mercenary army, a remuneration in-
tended to induce men to enlist and to reward them for
their services. It was only a compensation, and a very in-
sufBcient compensation, paid by the state to the citizen
who was taken from his calling and burdened with a
public duty. Even the troops levied only for a short
time reckoned more upon the booiy than on their pay,
and as a rule the movable booty was appropriated by a
victorious army.
Though the Soman soldiery were thus accustomed from Reoogni-
the very beginning to rely on plunder, the demoralisation plunder as
which necessarily resulted from this practice remained a»opple-
ment for
within narrow limits so long as the soldiers did not make inndequate
the service a profession, and so long as they fought only i^J^^"^ ^^
a^ainat foreign enemies, and not against rebellions snb-
jeots or allies. All this was changed in the Hanni-
balian war. The Soman soldiers, now serving for years
together, became naturally more and more estranged from
a life of labour, and adopted the habits of soldiers,
which naturally lead to the destruction and violent seizure
of properiy. For the indulgence of such propensities Italy
during the Hannibalian war offered the most favourable
terms. A great number of Soman subjects had joined the
invader. All these revolted towns and villages were gra-
dually reoccupied by the Somans, and the soldiers could
H H 2
468 BOMAN HISTORY.
BOOK at the same time indulge in their desire for pillage and
.^ / ■ ^ inflict chastisement on a rebellions population.
Ferocity ^ what manner this was done we learn from the dis-
consequent graceful sccnes that took place in Locri — scenes which
licence of Were certainly no isolated instances of such ferocity, but
pillage. which probably owe their notoriety to the mutiny to
which the pillage gave rise. At that time the prosperity
of whole districts of Italy was destroyed for many years—
a prelude to that desolation which continued down to the
imperial epoch. That the havoc made by the Boman
soldiery in Sicily was even greater, the horrors of Leon-
tini, of Enna, and of Syracuse are sufficient evidence*
In Spain the same rapacity led to insubordination
and mutiny. What Appian relates of the conquest of
the town of Locha in Africa shows that the Boman
soldiers ventured to satisfy their thirst for blood and love
of plunder in utter defiance of military discipline, and
under the eyes of the commander himself.' If this
could happen with troops levied from the population of
Bome and of the Latin and allied towns, and serving
in the Boman legions, how much more reckless must
have been the conduct of the irregular troops to whom
Bome had recourse under the pressure of her disasters ?
When, after the fall of Syracuse, the prsetor Yalerins
Lsevinus endeavoured to restore Sicily to order and to the
occupations of peace, he collected all the bands of marau-
ders that were devastating Sicily, and sent them over to
Italy, in order to molest the Bruttiaus as much as pos-
sible.^ In like manner, the two notorious publicans and
swindlers Pomponius and Postumius waged war on their
own account, but with the sanction of the senate. Then^
^ Appian viii. 15 : UoXtopKoviri 8* o^rotir^Xiy fuydXtfi^f f Spofta fp A^x^ *^
iroAX^ Btiph irdcrxov<rtf ol fi^p Aoxtuoi lepoartB^iiipvp tStP KXifidKvp iwtiaffnMctiopro
iicKtii^tP r^p T6\iy ^ir6<nrop9ot. Kal 6 ^nrlmp &yc«dAct rp aaknyyi t^f
<rrf>aridp' ^ 8* oix Mikovw ^h 6py^s Sp iT9w6p9€ffaPy ^X* hrtfidrrn roTs
rfix^fft Kol y6pcua ictd Tcu^la icartar^rrop' 6 8^ robs /jAp IPri Sktos Attx^lm^
&4>^Kcv &ira0€7r, r^p 8i arrfyariiip riiP Xtlav i^c^Xfro* ical robs XoxoTobt, Bmn
avpt^'flfioprop ixK^pwrfp ip rf iiitrtp koJl rpus rohs Xax^pras MXxurt Owir^,
• Livj, xxvi. 40.
GENERAL REMARKS ON THE HANNIBALIAN WAR, ETC. 469
again, the slaves who Iiad been enlisted as soldiers, and CHAP.
IX.
dispersed after the death of Gracchns, can have lived only .
hj plunder, and musi have contributed to the misery and
wretchedness into which years of war had plunged the
whole population of Italy.
That the mercenaries and foreign troops, employed in inflnence
great numbers by the Romans, exercised a pernicious in- ^^j^^^^
fluence on the discipline and bearing of the Boman soldiers, the regniar
is a &uit which cannot be doubted. The first traces i of Bome.
foreign mercenaries in the Boman armies we have noticed
already in the first Punic war.^ In the second war the
instances are very numerous. These troops were partly
Greek mercenaries sent by Hiero, partly deserters firom
the Punic armies, partly Gallic, Spanish, and Numidian
auxiliaries, and partly genuine mercenaries enlisted by
Boman agents. All these troops were animated, not by
patriotism or a sense of duty, but by the hope of gain ; and
if we are justified in assuming that the Boman, Latia, and
Sabellic soldiers were originally inspired by higher motives,
still they could not fail to be affected by the character of
their mercenary comrades.
But it was by no means the common soldiers alone who Character
became more and more habituated to plunder. It seems jtoman
that even the superior ofBlcers set the example to their military
officers.
men. In Locri, Pleminius conducted himself as a bare-
faced robber, and his quarrel with the two military tribunes
arose only from their having disputed the booiy with the
commander-in-chief. When Scipio had taken New Car-
thage, his friends, as we are told, brought him the most
beautiful maiden they could find as a choice article of
booty, and his refusal of this present was deemed an act
of exceeding magnanimity and self-denial. How Marcellus
acted in Syracuse we can judge from the complaints of
the Syracusans.* In fact it was an inveterate vice of the
Boman aristocracy, that they always surpassed the populace
in greed, and in skiU in plundering. Hence, in the old
> See above, p. 102. * See above, p. 873.
470 KOMAN HISTORY.
BOOK times, the charge that Camillus illegallj appropriated the
>- Z.,^ Bpoil of Yeii, whilst the exceptional praise bestowed upon
Fabricius for his abstinence only proves the general rule.
But the most striking proof of the systematic robbery of
the Boman nobility is their wealth. This wealth was
gained, not by labonr and economy, not by commerce and
enterprise, but by plunder. It grew with every new con-
quest ; and since Eome had possessions out of Italy, the
wealth accumulated in certain hands attained princely
dimensions, and raised its possessors higher and higher
above republican equality and above the laws. Whilst
the commanders of armies openly and by force seized
upon whatever they chose, another class of men carried
on the same crafb with quite as much skill under the
protection of legal forms. These were the contractors
and merchants who followed in the wake, of the armies,
as the jackal follows the lion, to gather up the fragments
left by the haste or satiety of those who had gone before
them. The soldiers could seldom make use of the booty that
fell into their hands, and they sought to convert it into
ready money as quickly as possible. For this purpose
they had recourse to the traders, who, it seems, regularly
accompanied them, and knew how to take advantage of
the ignorance or impatience of the troops. These men
bought valuables and all kinds of plunder, but particularly
the prisoners, and for what they had purchased at a low
figure in the camp they found a good market in Bome
and elsewhere. Their business was of course most
lucrative, as they were obliged to share danger and hard-
ships with the soldiers. That they should be, as a rule,
consummate rascals is natural, and this circumstance
contributed to brand the merchants of Bome as a set of
unprincipled impostors and as a species of thieves.
The Another class of traders were the usurers and speca-
andl!pecu- ^*^^^> '^^^ settled everywhere in the conquered countries,
lAtois. and brought down the curse of the provinces on the name
of Italians. The worst of these were the fiEirmers of the
customs and revenues i but their practices belong more to
OENERAL RE3LiRKS ON THE HANNIBALIAN WAB, ETC. 471
the long years of peace^ and their system of oppression chap.
could not be fully developed during the continuation * — 4-^—^
of the war. On the other hand it was precisely during
the war that the army contractors flourished. These
speculators formed joint-^tock companies and carried
on a most lucrative trade. There may have been honest
people among them who became rich without stealing;
but when we think of the in&mous acts of which a
Postumius could be guilty,^ we cannot doubt that the
practice of robbing the state was then as general with
these people as it has been with the same class in
modem times in all cases where they have not been
subjected to strict control
The consequence of every war is an increased inequality Influence
,_ of \FHP on
in the distribution of property. Whilst war greatly en- the distp*-
riches a few, it impoverishes the mass of the people. The ^^*'"° ^^
' * . property,
two principal conditions of peace — productive labour and
legal order — are, in every war, more or less set aside by
destruction and violence. The former reduces the total
amount of capital, and the latter brings about an unequal
and unfair distribution of it. This is the case particu-
larly in a predatory war; and in a certain sense all
the wars of antiquity, and particularly the wars waged
by the Eomans, were predatory. A war so great as
that which Hannibal waged against the Bomans, and
which, after long suffering and privation, bestowed upon
the victors so immense a booty, could not but exercise
a momentous influence upon Boman society and the Boman
state. On the one hand pauperism, and thereby the de-
mocratic element, were increased ; on the other hand, the
power and wealth of the reigning families grew more and
more ; and we already see the predecessors of those men
whose personal ambition and love of power could no
longer be kept within bounds by the laws of the republic.
We can form only an approximate idea of the devasta- General
tion of Italy at the close of the Hannibalian war, as we do tkmof^"
Italy.
> See above, p. 319.
472 ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK not know the thousandth part of the detail. Surely
>.- — ^ — the dream had come to pass which^ according* to
the narrative of Livy,* Hannibal had dreamt before liis
departure from Spain. On his march fix)m the nortli of
the peninsula to its southern extremity he had been fol-
lowed by the dreadful serpent which crushed plantations
and fields in its coils, and which was called the * desolation
of Italy/ The southern portion in particular had been
visited most dreadfully by the scourge of war. In Sajn-
nium, in Apulia, Campania, Lucania, and Bruttium there
was hardly a village that had not been burnt down or
plundered, hardly a town that had not been besieged or
stormed. Those fared worst that fell alternately into the
hands of the Bomans and of the Carthaginians. The
most flourishing cities, and especially almost all the
Greek towns, were in this position, on which the fate of
Capua is a memorable commentary. But the great suf-
ferings of this town must not divert our attention fix>ni
the misfortunes that befell other less prominent communi-
ties. Great tracts of land were entirely deserted, whole
populations of certain towns were transplanted to other
abodes. Forfeitures and executions followed upon the
reconquest of every rebellious township. A great part of
Italy was for the second time confiscated by the conquerors,
and considerable tracts of land became the property of the
Boman people. Tet it was by no means the rebellious
Italians alone that felt the scourge of war. The trusty
allies, the Latins, and the Boman citizens themselves
suffered as they had never suffered before. Whilst the
lands remained untilled, and the hand of the husband-
man grasped the sword instead of the plough, whilst the
workshops stood empty, the families were necessarily
exposed to want, even if they had not had to suffer under
the pressure of an increased taxation. The decrease of the
population is the surest sign of the effect of the war on the
citizens of Bome. Whilst in the year 220 the number of
* Livy, xri. 22.
GENERAL REMARKS ON THE HANNIBALIAN WAR, ETC. 475
citizens on the census lists amounted to 270,213, it had CHAP,
fallen in 204 to 214,000. We may certainly assnme that _ ^^' -
the Hannibalian war cost Italy a million of lives.
It seems strange, at first sight, that the great sufferings Hultipli-
of the Eoman people should have been the cause of new ^^an*
festivities and popular rejoicings. But festivals and feetivala.
games were religious ceremonies, designed to pacify the
gods. The plague of the year 364 had been the cause of
the introduction of scenic games,^ and thus, in the course
of the Hannibalian war, the number of public festivals in-
creased, in apparent contradiction to the public distress.
To the ancient ^ Eoman ' or ^ great games,' which had
originated in the regal period, and to the ^ plebeian games '
introduced at the commencement of the republic, there
were added in the year 212 the ^ ApoUinarian games '
celebrated every year from 208 downwards; and in the
year 204 the ^Megalesian games' were introduced, in
honour of the great mother of the gods. Besides these
the celebration of games of Ceres is mentioned in the
year 202,* and very frequently the several games were
renewed and extended for longer periods.'
Naturally such festivals, even if at first they bore a Character
religious character, could not fail to encourage the love ®^ ^"^^^
of pleasure. The numerous processions, the gorgeous ments.
funerals, and the funeral games arranged by private persons
at their own expense hnd the same tendency. Eor this
latter purpose the inhuman combats of gladiators, which
seemed destined to root out all the nobler and tenderer
sympathies of man and to extinguish all respect for the
dignity of the human race, had been imported from Etruria
as early as the year 261, the first year of the war in
Sicily. This element of demoralisation was introduced
simultaneously with the humanising art and poetry of
Greece, as if it had been intended to counteract its in-
fluence ; and thus grew the taste for the most abomin*
able and disgusting sights by which men have ever
> Vol. i. p. 669. • Livy, xxx. 39.
* Livy, xxiii. 30; uyii. 6, 21, 36; zzyiii. 10; zxiz. 11, 38; zxx. 26, 39«
471
ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK
IV.
'^- * — ^
Character
of Roman
art and
litpratoze.
corrapted and killed within themselTes all ihe higher
instinctB of humanity.
A people that revelled in the dying agonies of a man,
mnrdered for their brutal pleasure before their eyes, could
not really feel the ennobling influence of pure art We
cannot therefore wonder that Greek poetry never took
deep root in the Soman mind, but only covered its coarse-
ness with outward ornament, just as the Greek mythology
was patched on to the unimaginative religion of Italy as
an external addition. It is eminently characteristic of the
literature now developed among the Bomans, that it was
transplanted and never fully acclimatised on the foreign
soil. Instead of passing through a natural growth, as in
Greece, and advancing gradually from epic to lyric poetry,
and from lyric poetry to the drama, poetry was imported
into Italy complete, and all its branches were cultivated
at the same time. We may consider Liyius Ajidronicus,
from Tarentum, of whom we have already mentioned a
lyric composition, as the oldest poet of Bome.' His chief
strength lay in the drama, and at the same time he also
made the Bomans acquainted with the epic poetry of
Greece by a translation of the Odyssey. It is surprising
that the Bomans, from the very beginning, received with
such favour those Greek subjects which their poets treated
in the Latin tongue. They were certainly not acquainted
with the overflowing wealth of Greek myths and fables
which formed the subject of the poems now transplanted
to Italy ; yet they listened with breathless attention not
only to the adventures and sufferings of Ulysses, which in
their simplicity are easy to understand, but also to the
tragic fieite of the sons of Atreus and of Laios, and to the
mmes of Thyestes, Aig^thos, and Tereus, which, in their
dramatic form, roused the deepest emotion of the Greeks
simply because they were so generally known. We see here
most clearly how the marvellous influence of Greek fancy
prevailed even over barbarians, and took by storm an intel-
* See aboTo, p. 388.
GENERAL REMARKS ON THE HANNIBAUAN WAR, ETC. 475
lectual field hitherto uncultivated. Almost from the first
moment that the Bomans were touched with the ma^c
wand of Greek poetry, they had lost their taste and affection
for the first rude beginnings of their own poetic literature.
The Satumian and Fescennine verses and the Atellanian
plays were cast aside and despised by the educated. The
Latin language was forced into Greek rhythms, and the
whole Greek apparatus of poetical conceptions, phrases,
and rules T^as BlaviBhly adopted. A confusion of ideaa
was the consequence. The simple Bomans were often
unable folly to understand what filled them with wonder
and astonishment. It was not possible for them to absorb
and assimilate at once the varied products of a foreign
civilization, which had been the growth of centuries, and
to master at once the different philosophical systems j&om
the old simple mythology down to Epicurism and Eu6-
merism. It waa long before they found then* way in this
flowery maze ; but firom the beginning their delight was
great, and the victory of the Hellenic mind over the Italian
was decided.
The successor of the Greek Livius Andronicus was Livitts
Neevius, most likely a native of Campania. He also pur- ^^^ ^'
sued the same path, but he seems to have given to his ^^^ buc-
poems a more national colouring. Like his predecessor,
he wrote tragedies and comedies according to the Greek
pattern and filled with Greek subjects; but he also
selected materials from the national history, and chose the
first Punic war as the subject of an epic poem. In thus
entering upon the domain of real life and leaving that of
mythology, he acted in accordance with the tendency of
the Italian mind,' which had based the oldest dramatic
poetry on experience, and retained this principle in the
satires, the only branch of poetic literature which is native
on Italian soil. Naevius was also a satirist ; he persecuted
with venomous irony the powerful nobles destined by &te
to become consuls in Rome, and paid for his audacity by
> Vol. i. p. 670.
47fi
ROMAN HISTORY,
BOOK
IV.
Greek
influence
exile. The third and most eminent of those men wlxo
endeavoured to acclimatize Greek poetry in Borne was tlie
half-Greek Ennius, bom at Budisa in Calabria, a district
which, from its nearness to Tarentum, had become partly
Greek. Like his predecessors, Ennins was versed in several
kinds of poetry. He wrote tragedies, comedies, and heroic
poems, and it was he who first introduced the Greek heiot-
meter for the latter, and thus finally banished the old
Satumian verse from Boman poetry. His ^ Annals,' in
which he treats of the history of Bome from the found-
ation of the town down to his own time, in eighteen
books, have been of great importance to the historians.
As in England many, even educated, people derive their
views of English history in the middle ages from Shake-
speare's ^ Histories,' so the Bomans, who read the ^ Annals
of Ennius ' much more diligently than those of the ponti-
fices, often derived their first impressions of the old times
and heroes from his poetical descriptions ; and even the
annalists, who undertook to write the history of the Boman
people in the period intervening between the Punic wars
and the time of Livy, could not free themselves from the
influence which a popular poet like Ennius exercised upon
them. This is most striking in those parts of the second
Punic war in which Scipio plays a prominent part. Evi-
dently a considerable portion of this so-called history
belongs to the domain of fiction. Unfortunately, however,
we are unable to ascertain from the scanty fragments of
the poems of Ennius whether the chief source of these
poetic ingredients was his Annals or a separate heroic
poem which he composed to the glory of Scipio.^
Like literature, religion also felt the influence of Greece
during the Punic wars. The direct evidence of this is
> The histoiy of Roman literature concerns us only in so far as it can be
shown that the political and social condition of the Roman people was in*
fluenced by it. A detailed examination of the various literary productiotts
belongs to the history of literatnre, not to the political history (tf Rome. We
avoid therefore aU purely linguistici esthetic, and literary disquisitions, jost
as we avoid on principle everything which properly belongs to a handbook of
antiquities, archseology, chronology, &c.
GENERAL REMARKS ON THE HANNIBAL! AN WAR, ETC. 477
fotind in tlie adoption of Greek deities, as for instance the CHAP.
great mother of the gods, in the increasing importance of
the worship of Apollo, of the Sibylline books, and of the on the re-
Delphic oracle, and in the decline of ancient superstitions [js^ioii of
nnder the influence of free-thought. It is true the old RomanB.
auguries and the yoke of ceremonial law, with its thousand
restrictionB and annoyances, were not yet cast off, but
they ceased to trouble the cons«iences of the Bomans.
Scepticism had reached a considerable height when a
Boman consul could venture to say that ^ if the sacred
fowls refused to feed, they should be cast into the water,
that they might drink.' What Livy relates about C.
Valerius Flaccus is also very significant.^ This man had
in his youth quarrelled with his brothers and other kins-
folk, owing to his own irregular and dissolute mode of life,
and was considered altogether a man lost to decent society.
But in order to save him from utter perdition, the chief
pontifez, P. lacinius, ordained him, against his wish, to the
o£Gice of priest of Jupiter (flamen dialis), and under the in-
fluence of the sacred office this rake became not only
a respectable but even an exemplary man, and succeeded
in regaining the official seat in the senate which his pre-
decessors in office had lost through their unworthiness.
Nothing can be more characteristic of the spirit of the
Boman religion, and of the total absence of a morally
sanctifying element, than this appointment of a notorious
profligate as priest of the supreme god. It was a fabric
of formulae without meaning, a dish without meat. The
religious cravings were not satisfied, and men were carried
either to the schools of Greek philosophy or to the grossest
' Liyy, zxrii. 8 : *!Flaininem dialem iii?itaiii inangoniri coegit P. lAdnmB,
pontifex maximiis, C. Valerinm Flaocnm .... Ob adolescentiani negligentem
Inznriosamqiie C. Flaccns flamen eaptns a P. Lieinio pontifice maximo erat,
L. Flaeoo iiratri germano cognatisque aliis ob eade m vitia inrisiiB. Is, ut animum
eiva cuia Bacronim et oeremoniaram cepit, ita repente ezait antiqnos mores, ut
nemo totaioTeDtote haberetnr prior necprobatior primoribus patmm, sms pariter
alienisqnei esset Huins fam» consensn elatns ad instam fiduciam sui, rem
intermissam per multoa annoB ob indigDitatem flaminum priomm repetiyit, in
senatam nt introiret, etc/ — Compare Valerius Maximus, vi. 9, 3.
478
ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK
IV.
Increasing
poverty of
the lower
classes of
Roman
citizens.
and meanest superstition. Hence it ceases to be a matter
of wonder that in times of danger, as in the Gallic (225 b.c.)
and in the Hannibalian war (216 b.o.), the Roman people
should return to the barbarous rite of human sacrifices, thart
the town should be fiUed with magicians and prophets, thart
every form of superstition should be readily received by*
the common people, and that religion and morals should
cease to make an effectual stand against selfishness and
vice.
The increasing love of pleasure in Rome, and the grow-
ing splendour of the public festivaLs and games, cannot be
considered as a proof of a general increase of wealth in
the capital, and still less in the whole empire. The trea-
sures collected in Some had not been earned by labour,
but captured by force of arms. The peaceful exchange
of goods, which is the result of productive labour and
legitimate commerce, enriches the buyer and the seller,
and encourages both to renewed exertion. But when
brute force takes the place of a free exchange, both the
robbed and the robber become enervated. The curse of
barrenness cleaves to stolen goods. Who would gladly
toil in the field or in the workshop, and earn a scanty
livelihood in the sweat of his brow, if he has once revelled
in the spoils of a conquered foe 9 The Roman soldiers
lost in the long war the virtues of citizens. What they
had gained, they rapidly squandered, and they returned
home to swell the impoverished crowd that daily increased
in the capital, attracted by the amusements and still more
by the hope of sharing the profits of the sovereign people
through the exercise of their sovereignty. Whilst, on the
one hand, the love of sightnseeing was nourished, we hear
already of those demoralising distributions of com which
destroyed, more than anything else, the spirit of honourable
independence and of self-help. Already, in the year 203,^
a quantity of com, that had been sent from Spain, was
distributed at a low price by the curule eediles. This was
' Livy, XXX. 26.
GENERAL REMAKKS ON THE HANNIBALTAN WAB, ETC. 479
the most convenient way of keeping the populace in good chap.
humour^ and opposing those reformers who advocated the %, , ' , >
restoration of a free peasantry by means of assignments of
land on a large scale. At the close of the Hannibalian war
there was the best opportunity, and at the same time the
most urgent necessity, for a radical agrarian reform.
Great tracts of land in Italy were deserted, while thou-
sands of people were impoverished and without employ-
ment. It was possible and even easy to remedy both
evils at once, and to spread over Italy a free and vigorous
population, such bs had existed at the beginning of the
war. If this was now neglected, a future revolution and
the fall of the republic became inevitable.
That it was neglected was the fault of the nobility. A Lawless
few colonies, it is true, were founded, and a certain number ment of
of veterans received grants of land. But these measures ^
were not carried out in the spirit of the Flaminian distri- nobility,
bution of lands in Picenum.' The estates of the nobility
grew larger, and slaves took the place of a free peasantry.
The Licinian law, restricting the right of inclosure and of
using the common pasture — a law which had always been
infringed more or less — ^now became gradually obsolete.
By degrees these various causes brought about that state
of things which two generations later converted the Gracchi
into demagogues, and which, after the failure of reform, led
to the establishment of the monarchy. The course which
the development of the Boman state thus took, can be
ascribed neither to particular men nor to a particular class.
It was the necessary consequence of the frmdamentaJ form
of the political and social institutions of Bome. The
growth of the repubUc involved the emancipation of the
ruling class fix)m all public control.
The periodical admission of all citizens to the public Fnpon-
offices, which constitutes the real essence of republican thTiienate.
freedom and equality, was naturally checked by the supre-
macy of one city over great districts; while the in-
equality in the division of wealth, which impoverished and
' Sec above, p. 126.
480 ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK cowed the mass of the sovereign people, raised the ruling'
^.^ — r^~^^ classes above the authority of the laws. At the time of
the Hannibalian war this process was completed, and the
theory of the constitution no longer agreed with the
practice. The senate had ceased to be merely a delibera-
tive body, and the people had only a nominal control of
the legislative and executive power. The senate reigned
exactly as a sovereign reigns in a state which has only a
sham constitution. The officers of the state were its sub-
missive servants, and the people were used as a tool to give
the stamp of legality to the edicts of the senate. The
ruling nobiUty was fuUy developed. The government was in
the hands of a small number of noble families, to which it
m« aJl but impossible to gain admission. During the
whole course of the Hannibalian war we find no instance of
a *new man' having been chosen for any high republican
office. The names of the Comelii, Valerii, Tabii, Sem-
pronii, Servilii, Atilii, ^milii, Claudii, Fulvii, Sulpicii,
Livii, Gsecihi, Licinii fiU the consular fasti of the period.
Even the most brilliant personal merit no longer sufficed
to admit a man who was not a member of the nobility to
the higher offices of state. The knight L. Marcius, who
afber the fall of Cn. and Publius Scipio, had saved the
remainder of the Boman army in Spain, and had after-
wards been employed by the younger Scipio in the most
important operations of the war, was shut out, in spite of
his merits, from all high office, because he was not of noble
descent,* and this was at a time when military ability was
more important than any other. Even Lselius, Scipio's
staunch friend and confidant, obtained admittance to the
high offices of state with great difficulty, afber he had
failed in his first candidature for the consulship, in spite
of the intercession of his powerful friends (192 B.C.). This
jealousy of the nobility with regard to interlopers was by
no means due only to ambition and to a desire to serve the
> Livy, xxviii. 42 : ' Dux tnmnltuarius ille L. Marcius militari snfiragio ad
tempus lectus, ceterum si nobilitas ac jusii hofiorcs adomarent daiid impeia-
* toribus qualibet arte belli par.*
GENERAL REMARKS ON THE HANNIBALIAN WAR, ETC. 481
state. The extension of the Roman republic had rendered chap.
T Y
the honorary public offices sources of profit to their , _^_x
holders to an extent which the old patricians had never
anticipated when they consented to share them with their
plebeian rivals. There can be no doubt that it was even
then chiefly the prospect of pecuniary profit that increased
the obstinacy of the conflict for the possession of office.
But in the olden time religious conservatism, and the fear
of the profanation of the auspices by the plebeians, had also
exercised a considerable influence. Now there was no longer
any pretext for religious scruples, and the families that
were once in office excluded all outsiders chiefly because
they did not feel inclined to share the booty with them.
One of the most effectual means of excluding new Modes of
candidates was the burden laid on the sediles, who were now courting
required to fiurnish in part the cost of the public games.
At first the state had borne the expenses, and these had
remained within reasonable limits. But when the passion
for public amusements increased, whilst at the same time
the conduct of the wars and the administration of the
provinces brought immense wealth to the noble houses, the
younger members of the nobility used this wealth to win
popularity for themselves, by increasing the splendour and
prolonging the duration of the games at their own expense,
and thus acquiring a claim to the consulship and procon-
sulship, and the means of enriching themselves.' There
is no economy more pernicious or more costly than
that of paying the public servants badly or not at all. The
consequence is that they indemnify themselves, and that
they cease to consider fraud, theft, and robbery as serious
crimes. Thus the political life of Some moved continually
in a narrowing and destructive circle, and approached more
* Polybins (z. 5) says of Scipio Airicanus: ^dpxonf thtpy^riKhs Koi
fi€yak69c»pos KoUt trpoo-^iX^s (cctr^ riiif &ir(ivrY)<rtv awtKoylcaro r^v tov
irA'fiOovs vphs avrhy tUvoicty, lavy (xxv. 2) says of his sedileship : * JGdilicia
largitio haec fait : ludi Romani pro temporis illios copiis magnifice fucti, et
diem unum ioRtaarati et cong^i olei in vicos siDgulos dati.' — Compare Weissen*
bom's note.
VOL. II. I I
482 ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK and more to the fatal catastrophe. Corruption led to office
« — r-^ — ' and to wealth, and this wealth again made corraption
possible.
Growing The calculating avarice of the great, and the venality of
anceofthe ^^^ impoverished mass, were both engaged in bring-ing
nobility, about the ruin of the state, at first timidly and on a small
scale, but with constantly increasing boldness and reck-
lessness. Even in the Hannibalian war we find traces of
that cynical spirit which a dominant party does not ex-
hibit until it has lost both the fear of rivalry and the
fear of disgrace. It was even then not customary to
measure by the same standard the crimes of the nobility
and those of the common people. Whilst the soldiers who
fied at Cannae were punished with the greatest severity and
condemned to serve in Sicily without pay, the young nobles,
who had certainly not behaved with exceptional gallantty,
had risen step by step to the highest offices of the republic.
Cn. Cornelius Lentulus had been military tribune in the
battle, and had escaped through the fieetness of his horse :
he became queestor in the year 212, then curule sedile^ and
at last even consul in 201. P. Sempronius Tuditanus^ who
had also been military tribune at Cannse, became curole
sedile in 214, prsetor in 211, censor in 209, proconsul in
205, and consul in 204. Q. Fabius Maximus, the son of
the celebrated Cunctator, was in a similar position; he
became successively curule sedile, praetor, and consul.
Even L. Csecilius Metellus, who was said to have formed
the plan of leaving Italy after the battle of Cann®, and
was therefore the object of violent attacks from those
who, like Scipio and Tuditanus, claimed for themselves
the credit of greater bravery, became, after his return,
quaestor and tribune of the people. But, above aU others,
P. Cornelius Scipio himself, the conqueror of Zama, was,
in spite of his flight at Cannse, loaded with honours and
distinctions. It would surely have been natural if the really
ill-treated soldiers of Cannse had, in the prayer for justice
which they addressed to Marcellus, made use of the
words put into their mouth by Livy : * We have heard
GENERAL REMARKS ON THE HANNIBALIAN WAR, ETC. 483
that our comrades in iniBfortune in that defeat, who were CHAP,
then our legignary tribunes, are now candidates for honours, , * ^
and gain them. Will you then pardon yourselves and
your sons, Conscript Fathers, and only vent your rage
against men of lower station 9 Is it no disgrace for the
consul and the other members of the nolHlity to take to
flight when no other hope is left ? and have you sent ua
alone into battle for certain death ? ' ^
If this contemptuous and overbearing spirit of the nobi-
lity had been general at that time, the Boman people would
certainly not have borne the struggle with Carthage as
bravely and as successfully as they did. But these instances
of political degeneracy were as yet isolated. In the year
212, for instance, the nobility did not dare to protect the
incapable praetor Cn. Fulvius Flaccus, who had lost the
second battle of Herdonea, from an accusation and from
condemnation,' after the fugitive troops had been punished
by being sent to serve in Sicily. In spite of the inter-
cession of his brother Quintus, who had already been three
times consul, and who was at that moment besieging
Capua as proconsul, a capital charge was brought against
him, and he escaped the sentence only by going, as a
voluntary exile, to Tarquinii.
In spite therefore of some marks of decay already Hapid
visible in the political and social life of Home, the period of ^man
the Hannibalian war was still the zenith of the republican V^wtr,
constitution and the heroic age of the Boman people.
From this time conquest followed upon conquest with
surprising rapidity. Within two generations Bome had
attained an undisputed sovereignty over all countries
' Livy, xxri. 2. In a similar manner, the tribune of the people C. Sem-
proniufl BUestus expresses himself in the impeachment of Cn. Fulvius Flaocus,
who had been disgracefully beaten by Hannibal, and whose men were treated
just like the fugitive legions of Cannae. ' Cn. Fulvio fugam ex proelio ipsius te-
meritate commisso impunitam esse, et eum in ganea lustrisque, ubi iuventam
egerit, senectutem acturum ; milites qui nihil aliud peccaverint, quam quod
imperatoris similes fuprint, relegatos prope in exilium ignominiosam pati
militiiim : adeo impanm lihtrtaiem UoitktB diti ac pauperis honorcUo atque
inhonorato esse* * Liyy, xxvi. 2-4.
I I U
481 BOMAN HISTORY.
BOOK bordering on the Mediterranean. But the increase of
>, / ^. wealth and the decay of the old republican ^virtnes kept
pace with the extension of the Boman power. We turn
now to the consideration of the easy yictories over the
degenerate Hellenic states, before describing the great
straggles that preceded the transition of the republic into
the monarchy.
APPENDIX.
THE POPULATION OP ITALY IN THE THIED
CENTUEY B.C.
The nninbers as given by PoljbiuB (ii. 24) are tlie following : —
I. The field army, 156,800 men, namely —
a, Roman citizens :
lonr
Four legions of 5,200 foot and 800 horse
each = 22,000
h. The auxiliaries of the said fonr legions —
30,000 foot, 2,000 horse . . , = 32,000
c. Two legions of which we are not told
whether they were Romans or con-
federate&--8,400 foot and 400 horse . = 8,800
d. Allies:
1. Etmscans and Sabines — 50,000 foot,
4,000 horse = 54,000
2. Umbrians and Sarsinates (no divi-
sion of foot and horse) . =s 20,000
8. Genomanians and Venetians (no
division of foot and horse) . =s 20,000
n. Reserves 58,500 men, namely —
a. Romans— 20,000 foot, 1,500 horse . . = 21,500
h. Anxiliaries— 80,000 foot, 2,000 horse . = 32,000
210,800
486 ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK "^
IV. Brought forward 210,300
in. Besides these, the muster-rolls name 558,000
men, namely —
a, Romans and Campanians — 250,000 foot,
23,000 horse = 273,000
h. Allies, namely —
1. Latins— 80,000 foot, 6,000
horse .... =85,000
2. Samnites— 70,000 foot,
7,000 horse . . . = 77,000
3. lapygians and Messapians
—50,000 foot, 16,000
horse .... = 66,000 > =285,000
4. Lucanians — 30,000 foot,
3,000 horse. . . =33,000
5. Marsians, Marrucinians,
Frentanians, Vestinians
— 20,000 foot, 4,000
horse .... = 24,000j
The whole armed force 768,300
These statements are no doubt based on an official enumeration,
but leave much to be desired as regards accuracy and clearness.
Three distinct divisions are made : Homans, auxiliaries, and
allies. But only in the first two classes are given, besides the
numbers of the troops in the field, the muster-rolls of those liable to
mihtaiy service. Thence it appears that the states allied with
Home as equals kept no muster-rolls, and levied their auxiliary
forces, not ex formula^ but according to special agreement. With
the Cenomanians and Venetians this is self-evident ; but it must
also have been the case with the Umbrians and Etruscans. How the
Sabines come to be named in this class is inexplicable, as already
in the year 290 B.C. they were made Roman citizens sme suffragio.
It may perhaps be supposed that a part of them remained tree
and became a dvitas fcedernia, Now, if of the Etruscans and
the Umbrians we are informed that they furnished a field force
of 74,000 men, we are not justified in supposing that these com-
prised the whole population capable of bearing arms. If we
could assume that here the field force bore the same proportion
to the number of those still liable to service as in Rome and in
the auxiliary or confederate states (socii), namely, 116,300 :
* See above, p. 418, note 4.
APPENDIX. 48'
558,000 or about 1 : 5, we shonld find for Etmria and TJmbria the APP.
number of 370,000 liable to service, in addition to the 74,000 in "^ *
the field, and we shonld arrive at a snm total of 444,000 men
capable of bearing arms. If we allow five children, old men, and
women to each man liable to serve, i,e. to each man between seven-
teen and forty-five years of age, we shall have to estimate the free
population of these coxmtries at 2,664,000, a number which seems
not too great if compared with the population of the remainder
of Italy.
2. In Polybius' enumeration of the peoples of Italy, we miss
the Bruttians. Now it is possible that they may have been a
civitas foBderata^ and we may perhaps explain this omission in
the list by the &ct that they were thus not obliged to keep
muster-rolls, nor to frimish a contingent for the Gbllic war,
because of their southerly position. We are therefore left to
conjectures as to the population of this tract of country.
3. The same is the case with regard to the free confederate
towns, such as Tibur, Prseneste, Nola^ Nuceria, Camerinum,
Iguvium, and all Ghreek towns from Naples to Tarentum. We
can only guess at their population.
4. The numbers in Polybius are exact only for the troops
actually placed in the field. For the remainder he gives only
round numbers. We do not know whether, for the sake of
simplification, these numbers have been rounded off by the
historian who took them frx)m official lists, or whether they are
the result of approximate estimates, in which case they would
deserve little credit. With two peoples, the Umbrians and the
Cenomauians, the proportion of the infantry to the horse is not
stated. It would certainly be a mistake to suppose' that the
20,000 Cenomauians were all foot soldiers.
5. As the Cenomauians and the Venetians dwelt beyond the then
acknowledged boundaries of Italy, they must be omitted in an
estimate of the military forces of that country. We cannot even
consider them as permanent allies of the Romans, for their
alliance with Rome accidentally resulted from their feud with
the Insubrians.
6. On the other hand, in an estimate of the Roman forces,
Sicily ought to be taken into consideration. Here the Romans
had, besides their province, two allies — ^the Mamertines and Hiero
of Syracuse.
7. Polybius does not state whether the two legions stationed
in Sicily and in Tarentum were made up of Roman citizens or of
auxiliaries ; and this is an important defect in the whole statement.
* As Wietenheim dops {GeschichU der Volkerwanderungf i. 193).
488 ROMAN HISTORY.
BOOK It thus becomes impossible to determine the proportion* which
^^' . the contingents of the Romans and their confederates (socii) bore
to their respective populations. The remaining Eoman troops
amount to 48,500, and those of the confederates to 64,000.
Now, if we add the 8,800 men of the two legions in question to
the Roman forces, we find 51,000 Romans in the field, with 64,000
confederates. If, on the other hand, we add them to the latter,
we find 43,500 Romans and 72,800 confederates. It is evident
that this makes a very considerable difierence, for the muster-
rolls of both show an almost equal number — 273,000 Romans and
285,000 confederates. Lange ^ supposes that 64,000 auxiliaries in
the Roman armies were furnished entirely by the Latins, and
calculates (85,000 + 64,000, or 149,000 : 64,000 = 100 : 42^)
that the Latins therefore had to furnish nearly 44 (or
rather nearly 43) per cent, of their population capable of bearing
arms, whilst the Romans furnished only 16 per cent., t.e. four
legions at 22,000, four legions at 21,500, and the two legions in
Sicily and Tarentum, which Lange therefore supposes to have been
Roman; therefore altogether 52,300 Roman soldiers drafted
out of 273,000 + 52,300, or 325,300 on the muster-rolls.
How is it possible to believe that 43 per cent, of the men
qualified for military service could be drafted off to the war at
ttie same time P
8. It may appear doubtful wbether the lower classes of the
census — ^the proletarians and the capite censi, who were free &om
the duties of military service — were included in the number of
men capable of bearing arms. Our estimate of the population
will vary very much according to the result we arrive at respect-
ing this question. If the proletarians and the capite censi were
not counted, we should have to add a considerable number to the
sum total of the population, for the class of the poorest citizens
was very numerous. Still it is most probable that the proleta-
rians and the capite censi were counted, as already in the first
Punic war they were regularly drafted as rowers for the fleet,
and therefore belonged to the effective population ; further,
because, in the dangers of the Ghkllic war, they would, in case of
necessity, have been armed, and their numbers must therefore
have been known.
9. Other defects in the list are of less importance ; e.g, it is
uncertain whether those exempt from military service are passed
over, and,' further, those unfit for military service on account of
bodily infirmities. Wietersheim is certainly wrong in estimating
these at 25 per cent, of the population. Though in Prussia
' Romiache Altertkumer^ ii. § 103, p. 137. * Wietersheim, loc. cit, p. 196.
APPENDIX, 489
one-half of the conscripts are found unfit to serve, and in other APP.
countries two-thirds or three-fourths, that proves nothing for
ancient Borne. Sickly children were exposed by the nations of
antiquity. In the rural population of Italy, which formed by far
the greater part of the army, there were few weakly persons to
be found, and the ancients knew nothing of our parade exigencies
or of our medical examinations.
10. In the calculation of Polybius, those troops that were
already levied and formed inio legions (the field army of 62,800
Bomans and auxiliaries, and the 53,500 reserves, altogether
116,300 men) are added to the number of Romans and allies
contained in the muster-rolls (558,000 men). Thus Polybius
arrives at the sum of 674,300 men fit to bear arms, which, with
the addition of the 94,000 men of the Umbrians, Etruscans, and
Cenomanians would make 768,300, or, in round numbers,
770,000 men.
We may well ask whether this manner of calculation be
correct ; that is to say, whether the number of soldiers in the
field ought to be added to the number of those liable to serve,
contained in the muster-rolls, in order to obtain the sum total of
all persons capable of bearing arms ; and whether it is not more
likely that the number of troops already levied is contained in
the number of those liable to serve. In other words we must
consider whether these muster-rolls were only supplementary lists,
prepared after a part of the army had been already levied, or
whether they were intended to furnish a statistical basis for ^hia
enrolment. The latter plan would seem to be the only rational
one, especially as the Bomans had no standing army, but one
which was recruited every year out of the mass of tiie citizens
capable of serving, and which was merged again in the mass of
the people. If this view of the matter be correct, the number of
fighting men of the Bomans and their allies amounted not to
674,300, but only to 558,000 ; to which must be added the forces
of the allies (Etruscans and Umbrians) consisting of 74,000 men
in the field, or 5 x 74,000 = 370,000 fighting men. Thus the
sum total of the armies of Italy (with the exception of the
Cenomanians and Venetians) would be 928,000. Now if we add
72,000 — certainly not too high an estimate — for the contingents
of the free towns and of the Bruttians, we shall find in round
numbers amillion of fighting men for Italy proper, from the Sicilian
straits to Liguria and Cisalpine (}aul ; and if for each fighting man
between seventeen and forty-five, we allow five as the proportion
for old or sickly men, and for women and children, we shall arrive
at a free population of 6,000,000. How many aliens and slaves
there were, in addition to the free population, we cannot calculate ;
490 EOMAN HISTORY.
BOOK but taking 50 per cent, of the free population, the total popula-
_ ^y* ^ tion of Italy would amount to 9,000,000. According to Kalb*s
' Statistics ' (1865), the popxdatioii in Naples, the territories then
reckoned as the States of the Church, the Marches, Umbria, and
Tuscany, was 10,694,252.
It may further be asked, how many out of a given number of
fighting men can actually be summoned to do military service.
This depends upon the state of civilisation in the country. The
more a people has advanced on the path of civilisation, the fewer of
its members it can afford to place in the only class which destroys
instead of producing. In a barbarous people eveiy grown-up
man is a warrior. The field labour, the tending of the cattle,
and all indoor work, are left to women, children, and old men.
According to Caesar's account every fourth individual of the
Helvetii was a fighting man.^ The Gaelic clan of Glencoe
numbered, before its extermination under William III., three
hundred members and fifty fighting men, i,e, one for every six
individuals. Where slavery prevails, even in a more advanced
stage of civilisation, a large proportion of the free men are
available for war. This was the case in antiquity, and in the
Southern States during the American Civil War. It seems that in
Home it was a great exertion to send one- tenth of the eligible
population into the field, and the same proportion to the reserve
forces. This would be about the proportion given in the list of
Polybius : 62,800 in the field, 53,000 in the reserves drawn out of
674,800, or, according to our opinion, 558,000. The same is seen
in the course of the war, e.g. in the year 216, when about
100,000 men were serving in the field, i.e. 10 per cent, of the
said million of fighting men, and probably not much less in the
reserve force.
These were the forces of a people whom Hannibal ventured to
attack in the year 218 B.C.
» Bell. Gall. i. 29.
END OF THE SECOND VOLUME.
OCT
1915
LOKDOir: PUVTBD BT
RPOTTISWOODB AlfO CO.. nBW>STEBXT 5QUilBB
AMD PABLIAMBaT BTBBBT